View Single Post
Old November 22nd, 2010 #18
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor Dermott View Post
New words and coinages are necessary to fight the jewish tyranny - and these words must sound right too!
Just as important as continually coming up with new and tighter word skins to cover reality are using the ones we already have, without prejudice to source/creator, the sole determinant being they are the most effective in pursuing a particular purpose.

What the PhDs don't grasp is that the best way to build a mindset, a virtual culture, is to develop your own jargon. It is not so weird the mainstream can't get it, but it is attractive and unique so people are drawn to its humor, radicalism, freshness - its betterness than what's out there. Next to segregated physical colonies, this is the best that is done. But what most WN of any caliber beyond the average do is ape the models in the media. Which might work on a personal level, if their main goal is to sell a book or make themselves semi-famous, but in terms of radically changing our racial prospects is useless. The calling card of this type is that it uses exactly the same words the junkmedia do. Here's the takeaway, since these guys can't figure it out:

It doesn't matter if you're arguing against the 'mainstream' ie jew-communist position if you use their terms to discuss it.

The mere fact that you use 'racism' and 'anti-semitism' without prejudice (without holding these diseased-beetles in tweezers) is the verbal equivalent of passing under the yoke, as the Romans used to make the defeated tribesmen do.

The terms designed by professional loxists are weapons, not neutral vessels for facilitating communication. The fight is over before it has begun if you use their terms. Our side does not get this, never has. The most it will do is giggle and play around with a White term here and there, but in the end it 'knows' that serious, respectable, responsible people use the same terms everyone else does. Well, if you keep using the same preloaded anti-White lexicon called mainstream discourse you always have used, and you expect to get a different result from White defeat, then you are insane.

Whites want to win battles, yet 99% of them cannot even make out a battlefield.

Our cause amounts to separating ourselves, our race, from the enemy. We can't even do this verbally. It's even worse. We can't even perceive the need to separate ourselves verbally. 99% of us are, described objectively, conservatives who aren't willing to ignore nigger crime.

Most of what I'm saying is something known to those who know not so much by analysis as by feel. It is perhaps odd or not odd that the higher-IQ among us, especially those who have been to grad school and beyond, who have the most trouble grasping it, thanks to the professional deformation their minds have undergone.

What is that phrase the leftists use?

"The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House"

The concept is applies to WN and our fight. The System is designed to oppress us. The successful middle class risers who have become lawyers or professors or other wordsmiths may intellectually grasp the White case and support the White cause, but instinctively, because they have been able to rise, even so, within the System, cannot overcome their in-built respectability default, which, in the case of the words, always finds them instinctively deferring to known formulations, and eschewing White neologisms, no matter how anti-White the former and helpful-useful the latter.

The radical change we need will never come from any professor, it will come from an outsider. Someone with the internal genetic freedom to make the world anew, first in his head, second through his terms and virtual reality, finally through the medium of atomic rearrangement in the 'real' world.

Let me repeat this bit of insight, which the 'elite' among us have never grasped, and may not be able to grasp, for reasons of congenital deficiency combined with professional deformation. I use one term, 'anti-semitism,' but of course I could use many others. The insight applies to the entire class...

It doesn't matter if you are against anti-semitism (or racism, or homophobia, or x/y/z), simply using the term, even in the context of opposing it, amounts to the same thing as supporting it. If you use the term, you have not merely lost to the enemy, you have joined the enemy, helped the enemy, aided the enemy, in a very real sense been turncoated by the enemy, regardless of your volition and quite impersonally.

There is not a single high-profile, high-IQ WN or conservative who understands the bolded paragraph. Not one. The thinking of most 'elite' WN is female, rather than male. It is oriented not to creating or doing what is needed, but toward the reception its words will receive. The splash its words dress will make at the online media ball. When Kevin Macdonald writes, he thinks not about what will help our race, but what will improve his status in the eyes of the race-mixing neocon Derbyshire. When the grinning trimmer writes, he thinks not about what is good for his race, but whether his words will impress nigger-Veep-selecting Pat Buchanan. It's not that these men are selling out, they truly do mean to help our race. It's that they are congenitally incapable of grasping the way to go about it. The best they can think to do is emulate conservatives. But no real change will ever come from that direction. This is one of those things that you have to grasp genetically or intuitively. It can't really be taught. If your heart and interests lie within the System, no head-conclusion will ever tear you away from it, people just aren't built like that. If the System itself is the problem, then tinkering within its reform module won't accomplish anything. Discarding and replacing is the only option. Starting with terms. Every term we use with remotest bearing on the struggle must undergo White inspection before being approved for use. A lot of people tip their hat to this point, but they go no farther than repeating the platitude that we ought to consider what terms we use. What is needed, though, is much more comprehensive and wider scoped than that. What would be required is not merely technical but teampower. Technicians review every term out there for intent and purpose. They review what terms we have, what we don't have, what gaps have to be filled, what used terms could be improved; they figure where the new and better terms could come from. That's at the top. The team power comes in having a semi-trained body of amateurs and supporters who will use the terms correctly. Then only then do we have the beginnings of regular verbal warfare, as opposed to random retreat skirmishes.

There are plenty of White men who are inventive, clever, creative - men who can come up with terms that will create an alternative world to the judenpresse. But WN don't really believe their own claims. The fact that a jew says something on tv outweighs everything else. WN is primarily entertainment. Real opposition to the jew-System would be far more scientific, rigorous, and persistent.

What 99% of the elite who imagine they're defending our race are congenitally incapable of understanding is that when you're using the enemy's terms, you've already lost.

The only way to go about things that CAN work is to create a fictional, virtual world, in which things are set at their correct value, and described in accurate terms. And if this virtual world is to attract people, it must be funnier and more attractive than what the controlled media diffuse through their Propasphere.

Must show the world in a radically different way than what people see on tv, hence use different words and have different heroes and villains.

Quote:
Yep. Are they even worth trying to save? Vast swaths of whites have sunk and will sink into the jewish melting pot of diversity, idiocy, and KFC double-down induced fatassery that is AmeriKwa. The whites who recognize this degeneracy and seek a better way will be what remains - Whites.
I agree, with the proviso that many fall into System ways simply because they follow patterns. Pattern-following is the way of most folks at all times, so I would not be overly harsh on these people. We can show people a better way, and work toward its realization, and welcome to any who join us. That's the way to look at it. There's no need to make decisions about who is and isn't salvageable as the cost of reaching them online is the same.

Quote:
The jews are not as smart or all-powerful as many claim, but they are very dangerous. A WN leader who gains any amount of traction faces the very real possibility of death from them or their lackeys. At bare minimum, false charges from the jews' lackeys in the government can be expected.
Yes. This is true. What is just as bad is that WN have shown a tendency to blame their own. Of course people should be blamed for what they in fact are responsible for. But when the general failure of WN to take off as a movement is discussed, generally even WN themselves blame the movement rather than those trying to defeat it. This is wrong. It is not our beliefs or actions that are the problem. It is enemy activity that is the prime cause of our remaining a limited, virtual movement even though what we say echoes positively in the minds of a majority of whites. To the end of encouraging WN to blame themselves, and draw attention away from the real enemy, the jews and the politicians/police/bureacracies/media they wield against us the jews set up fake WN leaders like Jared Taylor who tell us it is all our fault. Our fault and our grandparents' fault. So we should blame ourselves and blame our grandparents, but never, ever blame the jews who are actually responsible. This sort of lying and self-blame is enedemic in our WN world, and it always signifies one of two things: that the liar is trying to coopt us (Jared Taylor model), or that the spouter of the advice is kibitzer, usually from the conservative ranks until he figured out race. Most people, even WN, have absolutely no idea about the kind of oppression and lies and personal difficulties that are heaped on anyone trying to even merely run a couple websites honestly discussing the problems Whites face. These are the ignoramuses who are just sure it's a simple matter of dressing, speaking or writing they way they say in order to achieve the right results. It doesn't work that way at all. And if you can't figure that out from myriad stories about those who criticize jews, you are worthless to the cause, as these people in fact are. They are here for the strudel-amusement. If there's any actual pain, they will run away at first hint of thunder.

Quote:
Yes, phrases and words that define new concepts should roll off the tongue with staccato punch, particularly when fighting the verbal war against jews. The words used to describe something must contain the argument itself, just as words and phrases that jews coin have the lies already built into them ("homophobe", "diversity..greatest strength").
The key to jew political terms is they exclude the middle. Their terms create a binary world: you are either a good, normal, moral guy who supports the jew-commie side, or you are the bad guy, which is indicated by the specific label they have for opponents on any particular 'issue.' Never does their rhetoric, the terms they use, the discussion frames they create, allow for anyone who disagrees with their policy to retain his humanity. He is morally dirty, politically dangerous, medically ill, socially stigmatized, fit only for jail or living under a rock with other nasty creepy-crawlies. Jews don't ever discuss. Nor do jews ever argue. Jews, rather, use words as weapons, to kill the character and reputation of their opponents. If these don't work, they resort to physical means. Never can you oppose a jew and keep your reputation intact. Thus, those concerned with their reputation never make effective jew opponents, or System opponents. If one side fights only by the rules of honor duels, and the other fights by whichever means seem likeliest to succeed, which side will win? Well, obviously, the side that always does win.

Quote:
"Loxism" definitely has a sound to it, with the strong vowel in the beginning. It's just... when are we going to hear it used by a talking head like David Duke the next time he goes on Wolf Blitzer? Perhaps it'll catch on.
Duke belongs to the fairness, justice and stay-positive school of thought. So he will not use any coinage referring to anti-White hate, he will talk about reasons anti-semitism exists, which is, as I've indicated above, the wrong way to go, as the meta-message is anti-semitism exists and is a huge problem. The farthest Duke has gone in the correct direction is to come up with 'jewish supremacism.' However, it's a somewhat clumsy attempt to turn the tables. Duke is not really a wordsmith, nor is he a particularly effective speaker. I mean by that no particular disrespect, merely an objective description: certainly David Duke is good enough with words to win a fair democratic election - but that's precisely the problem I'm talking about. As his campaigns have shown: the System is not going to allow you to win. The supposedly competing parties and free press will unite as one to stomp out any White flower that bursts through the jew-commie shitsoil. So the goal should be to operate with an eye toward shutting down the system and replacing it with a better one, rather than sustaining the silly pretense that our future lies as a growing small party within a functional democratic system covered by a free and independent press. No, we exist under a dictatorship that barely tolerates our existence, and that only until such time as we are bred out, and because it needs us to feed its larvae on.

WN in 2010 is online entertainment. Smarties write essays to impress other smarties. From time to time, a smartie is jugged for no reason. The others carry on while pretending nothing happened. No blow is ever struck back at the enemy. Just more essays repeating truths known 2000 years ago.