View Single Post
Old July 1st, 2006 #13
Shirt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreenMan
English 'Experts' have a habit of often being wrong.

English history expert Trevor-Roper's first pronouncement of the faked Hitler Diaries as 'genuine' may turn out as misplaced as the Exeter University expert claiming that the pyramid has no archaeological significance.

Osmanagic ought to keep digging to uncover more of the 'slabs', blocks, tunnels that he has noted - if the evidence is there, the truth will come out.
The problem being that he can't keep excavating the site without permission. And he cannot publish his findings without permission. He can only publisize his "theories". Which get debunked. By the so-called "experts". If the "experts" determine that he has no grounds for his theories, he is through. And the experts are vehemenently denying any grounds for his theories. While at the same time, the experts have not proven that what he has found in the way of tunnels, etc. is untrue. In fact, the "experts" are not saying anything about his findings other than writing the blocks, etc. off. He has found what he said he found, and the experts are saying that what he found is "poppycock". The "experts" always hustle these findings into the realms of "poppycock theories" when in truth they are not. Do you know that the astronomical significance of the great pyramids is still considered to be "poppycock" by the "experts"?