The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #3
Listen Here The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #3 (mp3 | 00:10:32)
Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
December 9, 2005
Welcome to the broadcast.
Did you hear about the murder of Robert Osborn? On, November 20th, in Kansas City, Missouri, Osborn was bicycling home when two blacks, out of boredom we’re told, shot him for sport. In fact, Osborn was hunted. The blacks after stalking Osborn in their car fired two blasts from a shotgun, missing him. Frustrated they drove ahead of Osborn and waited behind a tree, as Osborn bicycled past the black murderer leapt from his lair and shot Osborn in the head, killing him.
The local media described the killing as “random,” despite the fact that Osborn was white and the killers were black; despite the fact the blacks are 7 times more likely to kill
than whites; despite, for example, that blacks are only 12% of the US population but have killed 839 whites while, comparatively, whites were only responsible for the deaths of 362 blacks in 1998. Despite all these facts the murder of Robert Osborn was deemed “random.”
Now when I went to school I was taught the word random had certain connotations, such a thing without structure or organization or even something unknown or unexplainable. But there is an explanation for the murder of Robert Osborn. The cause of Robert Osborn's murder lies in the innate biological differences between blacks and whites. Biological differences that have been well investigated, though largely ignored and with tragic consequences. Blacks, for instance, have higher levels of testosterone, a hormone associated with aggression, and lower IQs. There are many more significant biological differences between blacks and whites, and for a deeper explanation of these differences I strongly encourage all curious listeners to acquire Phillipe Rushton's book entitled "Race, Evolution and Behavior
You know the use of adjectives like "random" or "unexplainable" to describe crimes great and small is quite common today. Some years ago I recall seeing Eli Wiesel - the Jewish holocaust activist - on the PBS news program the News Hour. In a rather lengthy segment Wiesel was asked to explain the holocaust: why did it happen, he was asked? Despite considerable rambling Mr. Wiesel failed to explain adequately, I felt, the phenomenon of National Socialism and the "holocaust" incident. Such evil defied explanation, he said. ‘How, how’, Wiesel rhetorically asked, as he shrugged his shoulders, ‘could a modern and progressive state like Germany succumb to such evil.’ How indeed, Mr. Wiesel!
Well, you know, I'm not one to believe in evil spirits, magic, or divine intervention. I think there are rational explanations for way things are. There is a very good explanation for the rise of National Socialism in Germany, and that regime's hostility towards Jews. The events of the twentieth century are hardly unexplainable as Mr. Wiesel would like you to believe. Just as the murder of Robert Osborn is hardly a random.
There’s also been a great deal left unexplained about the Russian Revolution in 1917. The first serious book I read about the Russian Revolution was written by a Polish Jew living in America, name Richard Pipes. Pipe's emphasizes the role of the Intelligentsia, the coterie of intellectuals which he sees as largely responsible for the tragic events of 1917. Pipes weaves a long thread, extending backward centuries, to explain the formation of ideas which propelled Russia into a catastrophe. Though, I’ve reduced Pipes’ arguments greatly, I felt his explanation left much unexplained: how could a nation destroy everything it had known for a millennium? How could a people slaughter their rulers, destroy ancient churches, starve millions, and plunge themselves into civil war. Pipes' explanation just didn't add up in my mind.
Back in the 1970s there was a popular quip, "only Nixon could go to China." By this it was meant that only a supposed staunch anti-communist like Nixon could negotiate with red China. Similarly, I suppose, it takes a Jew to name a Jew. This Jew, though, is not Richard Pipes, but Yuri Slezkine. What Pipes omits in his history of Russia, Slezkine reveals. In his newly released book the "The Jewish Century" Slezkine ‘spills the beans’ about the role Jews played in overthrowing the Russian government, Slezkine tellingly describes Jews as "Stalin's willing executioners." I invite listeners to read Kevin MacDonald’s
review of Slezkine’s book, which will be linked to in this program’s broadcast transcript posted on VNN Forum.
But really the "beans" were spilled long ago. Even before the revolution had settled down warnings flags were being raised, Winston Churchill wrote in Sunday Herald, 8th February, 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky, Bela Kuhn, Rosa Luxembourg and Emma Goldman, this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing."
"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one. It probably outweighs all others. With the possible exception of Lenin, the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders."
Churchill was not alone in warning the world. But, the warnings went unheeded. With the arrival of Slezkine’s book there seems to be a willingness, within certain narrow corridors, to grudgingly admit the Jew's role in subverting Russia.
If crucial facts can be ignored from titanic historical events think what little lies can be inserted into local news stories, like the murder of Robert Osborn? When researching the case of Robert Osborn I discovered the employees at the grocery store where he worked held a memorial in his name. This murder and the grief it has caused ought never to have happened. If someone had only said "hey, did you read what Jefferson and Lincoln said, those blacks aren't like us and we can't share the same government”. I wonder too if anyone ever asked "hey, did you hear what Churchill said? Look at what they did to Russia. Let’s not let the Jews into our country. They're dangerous and not like us."
If such advice was given it was ignored.
You know, I bet decades in the future some Jew will publish a book explaining that blacks and whites evolved in different circumstances, and it biology and evolution which explain the differences between blacks and whites; perhaps a book a lot like Philippe Rushton's "Race, Evolution and Behavior," published in 1995.
I’d like to close this broadcast with a reading from the Robert Osborn’s memorial page
1962 - 2005
Robert had a solid set of core values that were derived from a traditional family structure. He had a robust personality that was sheathed in an equally impressive six-foot, two hundred-pound frame with soft blue eyes and raffish blond hair. He and his three brothers enjoyed family vacations, camping in the outdoors and boating at Table Rock Lake.
He earned numerous medals and honors, including Eagle Scout and the "God and Life Award". He took pride in hiking twenty miles on many historic scout trails in the Midwest and was a member of Troop 421, which met at St. Bernadette's Church.
Robert was a standout performer on the water polo and swim teams. After his junior year, Robert was selected for a special two-month, scientific research program that was sponsored by the National Science Foundation. As an honor roll student, he was consistently ranked in the top ten percent of the class.
Robert earned a pilot's license and was a member of the Civil Air Patrol. After graduating from Raytown High School in 1980, he attended Purdue University. He majored in engineering, but demonstrated advanced abilities in mathematics, culminating in graduate-level coursework.
Robert made people feel special with creative gifts and cards. He would usually bring home-brewed beer, based on distinctive Belgian or German formulas, to family gatherings. He just wanted to make everyone happy.
Thanks for listening.