Originally Posted by Alex Linder
The upper middle class doesn't need a proxy, its elitism is satisfied by the safe, Correct sort of stuff Lander writes about in "Stuff White People Like."
The fascist ideology of this website is essentially selective recycling of antiquated ruling class ideology, since genetic determinism was once very popular in ruling class circles in order to justify colonialism, slavery, and genocide, though subtler forms of eurocentrism
are now in vogue.
Of course, your genetic determinism and ethnic bigotry isn't particularly consistent; it's selective. The doctrine of inferiority of non-euros
is a standard tenet of classical colonialist ideology, but the only intra-euro
"racialism" you adopt is against Jews, frequently typing of "Judeocommunism." While the association of ethnic Ashkenazim-Sephardim with socialism is many decades old, the association of other euro
immigrants and ethnic minorities with the same or other ideologies regarded as a threat to the ruling class is also.
Yet you do not write of the threat of Catholics, as with Samuel Morse's nineteenth century warnings of the Papist threat, nor adopt the antipathy to southern and eastern euro
migrants historically prevalent in the U.S. and still championed by the fascist movement's "Nordicist" tendency, or associate other ethnic groups that have genomic similarities to Ashkenazim-Sephardim with socialism, as with the association of Slavs with anarchism after Czolgosz assassinated McKinley (that eventually culminated in the First Red Scare and the Palmer Raids), or of Italians with the same after Sacco and Vanzetti were prosecuted and convicted. Maybe the people who espoused these classical prejudices were onto something that the "multiculturalism" behind modern white
supremacism has blinded you to?
Originally Posted by Zeth O. Grady
Your world view is based on Karl Marx's nonsensical idea that all human activity originates from "class struggle".
None of your conclusions has any validity, because they are founded on a false idea.
Are you not even clever enough to avoid an instant repetition of the genetic fallacy?
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest
That's reason enough to allow it to continue its Sterno-induced "euro"-hating war-hootings: let the fence-sitters see what the salivating, antennae-rubbing cucarachas can't wait to do to them when they're calling the shots in just a few more years.
Why do you find my agenda distasteful, Whorest? Isn't it in favor of the "white homeland" that the membership here crows on about, and geographic isolation from the ostensibly inferior non-white
Originally Posted by Alex Linder
The hardest thing I ever did physically was a spur-of-the-moment 12-13 miles hike down and back up the Grand Canyon
It's actually called Bidááʼ Haʼaztʼiʼ Tsékooh
The remainder of your tedious rambling illustrates two facts that I was already aware of.
The first is that your deluded worldview is influenced and shaped by your subjective anecdotal perceptions. While this is an inevitable condition of everyone's worldview, to some extent, the fact that your worldview is in fact so deluded is that it's dominated
by anecdotal experiences that you perceive as negative. When empirical evidence based on large data sets contradicts your worldview, as I have repeatedly demonstrated that it does, you dismiss it in favor of your anecdotes, the standard behavior of the religious fundamentalist who favors his preconceived ideological dogma and confirmation bias to reality.
The second is that the bilagaana
know in their hearts that they are markedly physically inferior because of the sedentary lifestyle that the majority of them have chosen to adopt, and feel the psychological need to perform essentially theatrical acts that they believe represent physical prowess to convince themselves otherwise. Though Southwestern Indians historically and presently accomplished and continue to accomplish arduous physical routines of much greater intensity, this little jaunt is symbolic of the sad remains of euros'
attempts to reconnect to the outdoors. One of the reasons that Germans, including Hitler himself, were so enthralled by Karl May novels, is that the heroic frontier adventures of Old Shatterhand and Winnetou represented virtues of the rugged outdoorsman and warrior that the majority of them were personally unfamiliar with.
A related point is that the essential "conquest" of the "Grand Canyon" symbolically represents the victory of man over nature and your psychological need to conquer a powerful foe and assure yourself of your own rugged masculinity.