View Single Post
Old September 29th, 2007 #59
HighPlainsDrifter...
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richyrichard View Post
One reason whites don't unite is because by nature we tend to be individualistically oriented. The politics that seems to appeal to whites the most is one that is based on the concept that freedom means an absence of government. States' rights and local government are just other forms of government and therefore are not sufficient to spark a unity. The key word here is destruction.

Whites seem more inclinded to unite only if the purpose of the unity is to restore their dis-unity. Separatism and the desire to just be left alone has much appeal to whites. Suffice it to say, government needs to be reduced to delivering the mail and keeping the patent office open if you want popular support from whites. National Socialism is not what white American believe in. Perhaps if it is repackaged and offered under a new name it might fly, but America is unique in that we like to be independent...from everyone including our own.

(copied from RealRome yahoo group messageboard)


Help Wanted

Job description: King of England

Qualifications: see any history book (this job is not necessarily hereditary)

Salary: enough


I don't advocate breaking any laws or inciting or conspiring to break any laws. Nonetheless, I have a right to discuss the question:

Who is the rightful King of England?

Many Americans are descended mostly from English. Many of us are descended from supporters of Bonnie Prince Charlie. So, we can ask the above question.

If you think that you are the rightful King of England, please say so. If you are indeed the rightful King of England, you don't need any more instructions from me; you know what to do. To educate my fellow commoners, I make these three points:

1. English ethnicity is important.

2. So are the will and skill to rescue the English race from extinction.

3. Since the present royals seem already to have abdicated in everything but name (allowing the overthrow of the true hereditary House of Lords, and now the extermination of the entire English people) a genealogical relationship to the present royals would not seem to be a plus. Many people are descended from historical English royals; if documented, this would be a practical plus, though less important than #1 & #2.


Almost a year has passed, since Rome (realrome Yahoo group) called for Elizabeth and Charles to abdicate in favor of William or Harry. There has been no response whatsoever from any of the royals.

Meanwhile the extermination of the English race continues, through compulsory tax-funded mass importation of anyone and everyone, the more dissimilar from the English, the better, the government seems to think. What have the royals done about this treason? Whatever they've done, it's too small to see. Therefore the royals are accessories to treason.

Will the English get a real king, or not? That is to say, will the English be exterminated like the dodo, or not? A WWII veteran remarked that the English are slow to anger, but when angered, are the most ferocious fighters in the world. We might soon see that put to the test, when the sarcastically named "greatest generation" which tragically exterminated our Fascist brothers in Germany, is gone, and their grandsons face the task of defeating the millions of Arabs, Gurkhas, Bantus, etc., which the Jewish "Lords" (super-rich Jewish "Life Peers" who expelled the real English Blood Peers from the House of Lords) have imported to wipe out the English.