View Single Post
Old February 21st, 2014 #9
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Emerson View Post
We need a plan to defend ourselves from enemy action and eventually to attack. Not with guns, with the same kind of weapons the enemy uses on us, media weapons.

Most of what the enemy (Jews and anti-white whites) does depends on public opinion and that is shaped by the media. When a white nationalist needs help or is in trouble he can count on the police, courts, juries, academics, businesses, and the man on the street to be biased against him. That bias is constantly reinforced by the controlled media.

To fight back white nationalists need to produce their own media and begin shaping public opinion. This is a long term plan, though maybe not as long term as we'd expect. The Jews were fighting an uphill battle turning whites against themselves. Our message is much easier to sell if we can reach whites with it.
Jews control tv. They and their government are not going to allow unimpeded white racial access to FCC-regulated airwaves.

The best we can do for now is use the internet. This is what Golden Dawn does in Greece. It's good enough to get them 20% of the vote, by some polls. They complain daily, though, about extreme hatred toward and bias against their party in the medai. Even when they're an established, successful party with at least ten percent of the nation behind them, they are either treated unfairly in or frozen out of the televised media.

Quote:
To accomplish this whites have to control their own media from production to distribution. Behind the scenes we need writers, camera men, directors, lighting and sound technicians. In front of the cameras we need spokesmen and spokeswomen, pundits and experts, comedians, talk show hosts and eventually actors and actresses for pro-white scripted programming. Way behind the scenes we need administrators and programmers to keep the video and audio streaming servers online.
Where is this talent going to come from? It's certainly not in evidence at the moment. The people with the professional-level talent needed to begin thinking about competing with the jews almost always choose to go the conservative route. This is a pereniall problem for a truly radical cause like white nationalism - the stuff that seems sort of like it that's safe will exert a suck-back on it. People who know WN is the right way to go nevertheless for safety/money will revert to conservatism.

It's fine to say we should control distribution, but that's only possible on the internet. There's not even any conceivable way to get into cable tv, and that's where the big numbers are.

Quote:
The Fox Network programs just nineteen hours a week. They have distribution that we never will (until we win) with broadcast stations in every big market. But our media can reach most whites in the US with internet streaming. Nineteen hours of programming every week can be achieved by starting with one day and expanding over time. That's how Fox did it.
That might be possible. It can't be overemphasized how important DAILINESS is. THAT is what builds an audience - doing something every single day. That was how the original VNN built up - daily satire.

The circumstances in my view dictate that a ju-jitsu approach is best. We use the opponent's weight against him. He has his agenda, but we can take his stories - the stuff most people are talking about, because it's what they see - and give them our spin. And then add side dishes that are purely our own stuff.

What's effective with smart, driven people is the jew Jon Stewart approach at COMEDY Central - mocking. White nationalists are perfectly position to do that, given what the mainstream controlled media are hiding. But do we have the talent and the perseverance, let alone the funding?

Quote:
Applying Saban's ideas to this recruiting the right people and holding them to high standards is the key. Everyone involved above an intern must be a loyal, honest, intelligent, hard working white man or woman. And even interns have to behave themselves.
We need loyalty and professionalism. Vetting and, yes, micromanagement are necessary because of the enemy and his actions. Essentially, WN must rise "up from Southernism." We require a combination of fanaticism, loyalty and technical competence. That's a tall order. Anything less won't work.

Quote:
Quality television (in the technical sense) doesn't happen by chance. Influential programming requires even more planning and craftsmanship. This doesn't require the army of people employed in Hollywood film production or big four network news broadcast, but it does require the essential technical personnel and propaganda writers to know what they're doing.

One element of quality television is the man or woman in front of the camera. Are they well dressed? Are they the correct type of person for their intended role? Are they playing the part of a Jay Leno, Dan Rather, Rush Limbaugh or Angelina Jolie? Are they dressed appropriately for that role?

You can be sure that when you watch a network newscast, talk show or news magazine program all of these things have been carefully considered, and if they've been overlooked (in the case of elderly, unattractive Jewish reporters who won't retire, yes, 60 Minutes, I'm looking at you) the production people are well aware of the problem.

Another element of quality television is basic, sound and vision. Is the sound clear? Is there background noise? Is it mixed so you can easily hear and understand everyone? Is the image in focus? Are camera movements fluid? Is the editing smooth, always showing what needs to be seen and hiding what needs to be hidden? Are flesh tones natural? Does the set's color scheme clash with the performers wardrobe? Does some of this seem petty, like something a real he-man shouldn't concern himself with? The Jews don't think so. They were meticulous in crafting the media weapons that have brought us to the brink of extinction.

Pay attention to how they did it. Thanks to the media equivalent of Moore's Law now we can do it too.
A few competent loyal people could do something that might catch on in a big way. Finding and funding those people is a challenge. I also question the need for a straight broadcast in light of the huge success of the Daily Show at Comedy Central. We need a revolution, and that means young people with energy even more than old people with money.