Jewish Blood Libel
The Anti-Gentile hoax about Southerners publicly terrorizing the Mary Phagan murder trial jury to the defendant Leo Frank's detriment was Invented in 1956 by two Jewish Supremacists, Charles, and Louise Samuels in their anti-Gentile false history book "Night Fell on Georgia", and then this same hoax was later pushed into mainstream academia by quack-professor and Jewish activist Leonard Dinnerstein in 1968. Keep in mind the trial determining Leo Frank's fate was in 1913, and no reports of mobs shouting anti-Semitic death threats at the judge, jury, and audience at the Mary Phagan murder trial exists between 1913 and 1956, but because the defendant Leo Frank was found guilty, once enough time had passed Jews started their efforts to falsify history as they always do in their favor.
Source of the Anti-Gentile 1968 Leonard Dinnerstein Hoax.
Now over half a century of scholarly fraud (1956, 1968 - 2019 and beyond?).
This hideous anti-Gentilic and racist hate crime hoax about the Leo Frank trial keeps on being featured in the mainstream, even the ADL pushes it on their website, in several different articles. Now well over 60 years old and running strong, who knows how long it will live on in the Jewish-Gentile ethnic warfare regarding the Frank-Phagan affair (1913-1915, 1986). Abraham Foxman of ADL fame, their national director from 1987 to 2015, pushed the hoax on the ADL website, now Jonathan Greenblatt pushes the same hoax on the ADL website as well. So do other members of ADL.
Attorney Roy Barnes JD
The most recent person to promote the anti-Gentile hoax as of 2019 is a former governor of Georgia, Roy Barnes. He did so at Mercer Law School in Georgia, and on TV, filmed by 11Alive.
On April 26, 2019, Fulton County District Attorney in the capital of Georgia has at the inspiration of Barnes, the ADL, and the Leo Frank case, created the "Conviction Integrity Unity CIU" with the unwritten purpose of overturning the 1913 conviction of the Mary Phagan sex-strangler, known infamously as Leo Frank the toilet strangler. Leo Frank strangled Mary Phagan to death after raping her in the men's toilet on the second floor in an area of the building called the metal room.
Roy Barnes is regularly featured in media reports as a CIU leading adviser for Atlanta D.A. Paul Howard.
In a number of news images concerning the CIU, one can see members of ADL, Rabbi Lebow, Shelley Rose, and other members of Jewish supremacist advocacy groups glibly cooing and giggle together in photo ops.
Article: "Leo M. Frank and the American Jewish Community" by Leonard Dinnerstein, American Jewish Archive Journal, Volume 20, Number 2, November 1968.
American Jewish Archive's 1968 Leonard Dinnerstein Hoax:
This item is the source of Leonard Dinnerstein's November-68 disingenuous anti-Gentile chicanery, mischief, bamboozle, and blood libel, about mobs of Southerners, directly terrorizing all the people at Leo Frank's trial, while the courtroom events were underway during the day time in late July through August until Frank was convicted.
Dinnerstein claims loud screaming of murder threats were made to the jury that if they didn't hang Leo Frank, then the 12-men sworn to decide the case would be hanged themselves. Dinnerstein's anti-Gentile blood libel is widely repeated by Jewish activists who advocate for Leo Frank's innocence and his eventual exoneration. This is an anti-Gentile blood libel.
The Leo Frank Case (1968) is the first book version of Leonard Dinnerstein’s 1966 dissertation on the same subject. Leonard Dinnerstein (retired and now deceased) was Emeritus professor and director of Judaic Studies at the University of Arizona. In 1965, he was a recipient of the Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Fund for Doctoral Dissertation Fellowships in Jewish Studies. What does this say about Jewish scholarship and academic research in terms of Jewish activism?
Here is the quote from Leonard Dinnerstein, page 110, American Jewish Archives Journal, November 1968:
Beyond the main testimony, the jurors had little more on which to base their decision than hearsay, rumors, and unsubstantiated accusations. Yet most members of the public were thoroughly convinced of the defendant’s guilt and made their voices heard, The intense summer heat necessitated that the courtroom windows be left open, and remarks from the crowds could be heard easily by those inside. “Crack the Jew’s neck!” – “Lynch him!” – were some of the epithets emerging from the more boisterous. Threats were also made “against the jury that they would be lynched if they did not hang that ‘damned sheeny.’ “
A pure example of anti-Gentile blood libel.
Leonard Dinnerstein's claim was something he fabricated from "whole cloth", it is a tissue of lies and he based his entire career on exaggerating anti-Semitism. This is what Jewish scholarship is all about, falsifying history and fake news.
+ + +
Audio-Book: The Frank Case, part 2
Posted on 23rd day of April in 2020 by Ann Hendon
Image: A photograph of Leo Frank, as published in The Frank Case.
THE AMERICAN MERCURY now presents the second part (of three parts) of our audio version of what is probably the most hard-to-find book on the murder of Mary Phagan and the trial of Leo Frank — 1913’s anonymously published The Frank Case — read by Vanessa Neubauer.
Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.
The Leo Frank Case: Inside Story of Atlanta Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery, now continues as we get into the detailed story of the trial itself.
One very interesting thing strikes me about this section of the book. Even though the book, I find, is moderately pro-Frank, what it reveals about the atmosphere surrounding the trial tends to strongly disprove the modern “Frank was railroaded by anti-Semitic Southern Whites” theory.
The book states that, after Mrs. Frank attacked the prosecutor, Hugh Dorsey, in an open letter during the proceedings, the phrase “Dorsey is prejudiced [against Jews]” could be heard “on the lips of men all over the city.” That doesn’t fit with the idea that Atlantans were strongly anti-Semitic. And they weren’t: Numerous Jews have said that the South then, as now, was the most pro-Jewish area in the country.
The book goes on to say that “many on the street sympathized with Mrs. Frank’s letter denouncing Dorsey,” which reinforces the previous point.
Even though the crowds surrounding and eager to get into the courtroom are described in the book — and remember, This Frank Case book was published in the city where the trial took place, just weeks after it ended — nowhere are the supposed “anti-Jewish mobs” surrounding the courthouse, screaming “hang the Jew or we’ll hang you” mentioned. They were not mentioned because they did not exist.
The “screaming mobs” are the product of the well-oiled and heavily-funded pro-Frank propaganda machine. That propaganda machine was begun in 1913 by cynical advertising mogul Albert Lasker (who was paid hundreds of thousands for supporting Frank even though in private he suspected Frank was a sexual pervert) and continues today under the aegis of the “mainstream” media and pressure groups like the ADL. (The ADL was founded by the B’nai B’rith, of which Leo Frank was an official at the time of his crime and conviction.)
We at the Mercury are offering this audio-book in three parts in April of the year 2020, in commemoration of the life of young Mary Phagan, who died at the hands of Leo Frank on 26th day of April in 1913 — 107 years ago this month.
To hear part 2 of The Frank Case, simply press the play button on your screen.
https://theamericanmercury.org/2020/...k-case-part-2/
All the parts of this audiobook are published here:
https://theamericanmercury.org/tag/the-frank-case-book/