Quote:
So VNN, Stormfront, et all. All I'm asking is for you to hold a consistent line on something that should be such a common denominator for you if you all hate jews so much. What is the sense in defending the German nazis from accusations of a deed that you only want to emulate anyway?
|
The WN position on the Hollow Hoax is consistent. It may be encapsulated in bumper-sticker form:
"It didn't happen, but it should have."
Our position is Hitler was too nice. He didn't understand the full nature and danger of jews. Read David Irving's
Hitler's War. Though Irving is not a "Holocaust denier," the fact is that his work proves that if there was a concrete extermination effort (which is doubtful, to say the least), Hitler did not instigate it and it was uncoordinated; that's the absolute best that can be said in favor of the Hollow Hoax tale.
Jews were always afraid someone would exterminate them, for good reason. They made the same claim of "six million jews killed" during World War
ONE as well as in World War Two.
The idea comes from the jews themselves. It's a paranoid fantasy that became a shake-down tactic and Aryan-culture-destroying tactic. It is not our fault if it is also a superb idea.
If those very simple nuances are too abstract for you to graph, perhaps you should consider the very real possibility that you are not intelligent enough to be posting in this thread.