Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 31st, 2014 #1
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
Default The Revolutionary Power Of The Race Struggle

Quote:
The European Revolutions of 1848, known in some countries as the Spring of Nations, Springtime of the Peoples[3] or the Year of Revolution, were a series of political upheavals throughout Europe in 1848. It remains the most widespread revolutionary wave in European history, but within a year, reactionary forces had regained control, and the revolutions collapsed.

The revolutionary wave began in France in February, and immediately spread to most of Europe and parts of Latin America. Over 50 countries were affected, but with no coordination or cooperation among the revolutionaries in different countries. Five factors were involved: widespread dissatisfaction with political leadership; demands for more participation in government and democracy; the demands of the working classes; the upsurge of nationalism; and finally, the regrouping of the reactionary forces based on the royalty, the aristocracy, the army, and the peasants.
Revolutions_of_1848 Revolutions_of_1848

Moses Hess was a friend and collaborator of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Hess converted Engels to Communism, and introduced Marx to social and economic problems. Hess was probably responsible for several "Marxian" slogans and ideas, including religion as the "opiate of the people."

Hess became reluctant to base all history on economic causes and class struggle, and he came to see the struggle of races, or nationalities, as the prime factor of history. Hess published Rome and Jerusalem in 1862, where he interprets history as a circle of race and national struggles.

Quote:
Social life-tendencies are, like spiritual life-views, typical and primal race creations. The entire past history of humanity originally moved only in the circle of race and class struggle. The race struggle is the primal one, and the class struggle secondary.

The Last National Question by Moses Hess - Epilogue
Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and other Jewish communist theorists downplayed the race struggle. To them gender and race struggle have their own material bases in society distinct from class, but exist within the class structure.

For Judeo-Communism to survive in Europe it needs equality between workers of all races and genders.

The struggle of gender and race are critical political and social issues, because with these struggles there can be no real unity between Jewish workers and European workers. That is why anti-semitism was punished with death penalty in Soviet Russia.

Marxists considered unity as imperative for workers to free all humanity from exploitation, so long as workers are divided, they will continue to be conquered by Capitalism.

But the race struggle continued mostly in Western Europe where Judeo-Communism was defeated by Fascism in Italy and by National Socialism in Germany. This is where the racial question reached its zenith and where the alien races living in Europe were more thoroughly exposed.

Of course the Judeo-Communists didn't liked it as you can see in the Leon Trotsky article about National-Socialism.

Quote:
The theory of race, specially created, it seems, for some pretentious self-educated individual seeking a universal key to all the secrets of life, appears particularly melancholy in the light of the history of ideas. In order to create the religion of pure German blood, Hitler was obliged to borrow at second hand the ideas of racism from a Frenchman, Count Gobineau [4], a diplomat and a literary dilettante. Hitler found the political methodology ready-made in Italy, where Mussolini had borrowed largely from the Marxist theory of the class struggle. Marxism itself is the fruit of union among German philosophy, French history, and British economics. To investigate retrospectively the genealogy of ideas, even those most reactionary and muddleheaded, is to leave not a trace of racism standing.

The immense poverty of National Socialist philosophy did not, of course, hinder the academic sciences from entering Hitler’s wake with all sails unfurled, once his victory was sufficiently plain. For the majority of the professorial rabble, the years of the Weimar regime were periods of riot and alarm. Historians, economists, jurists, and philosophers were lost in guesswork as to which of the contending criteria of truth was right that is, which of the camps would turn out in the end the master of the situation. The fascist dictatorship eliminates the doubts of the Fausts and the vacillations of the Hamlets of the university rostrums. Coming out of the twilight of parliamentary relativity, knowledge once again enters into the kingdom of absolutes. Einstein has been obliged to pitch his tent outside the boundaries of Germany.

On the plane of politics, racism is a vapid and bombastic variety of chauvinism in alliance with phrenology. As the ruined nobility sought solace in the gentility of its blood, so the pauperized petty bourgeoisie befuddles itself with fairy tales concerning the special superiorities of its race. Worthy of attention is the fact that the leaders of National Socialism are not native Germans but interlopers from Austria, like Hitler himself, from the former Baltic provinces of the Czar’s empire, like Rosenberg; and from colonial countries, like Hess, who is Hitler’s present alternate for the party leadership. [5] A barbarous din of nationalisms on the frontiers of civilization was required in order to instill into its “leaders” those ideas which later found response in the hearts of the most barbarous classes in Germany.

Personality and class – liberalism and Marxism – are evil. The nation – is good. But at the threshold of private property this philosophy is turned inside out. Salvation lies only in personal private property. The idea of national property is the spawn of Bolshevism. Deifying the nation, the petty bourgeois does not want to give it anything. On the contrary, he expects the nation to endow him with property and to safeguard him from the worker and the process-server. Unfortunately, the Third Reich will bestow nothing upon the petty bourgeois except new taxes.

In the sphere of modern economy, international in its ties and anonymous in its methods, the principle of race seems unearthed from a medieval graveyard. The Nazis set out with concessions beforehand; the purity of race, which must be certified in the kingdom of the spirit by a passport must be demonstrated in the sphere of economy chiefly by efficiency. Under contemporary conditions this means competitive capacity. Through the back door, racism returns to economic liberalism, freed from political liberties.

Nationalism in economy comes down in practice to impotent though savage outbursts of anti-Semitism. The Nazis abstract the usurious or banking capital from the modern economic system because it is of the spirit of evil; and, as is well known, it is precisely in this sphere that the Jewish bourgeoisie occupies an important position. Bowing down before capitalism as a whole, the petty bourgeois declares war against the evil spirit of gain in the guise of the Polish Jew in a long-skirted caftan and usually without a cent in his pocket. The pogrom becomes the supreme evidence of racial superiority.


What Is National Socialism? - by Leon Trotsky
This might be one of the articles that scared the most Trotsky the Jew and why his modern successors always want to fight "racism".

Quote:

There is open discussion about all questions in Germany, and every German claims the right to decide this way or that on all issues. One is Catholic, another Protestant; one is a job-seeker, another an employer; the capitalist, the socialist; the democrat, the aristocrat.

A commitment to this side or that has nothing inherently dishonorable for the man of our era. It happens in all openness, and where the opposites still appear unclear and muddled, one clarifies them through discussions into argument and counter-argument. Only one issue is barred from public consideration, and it is provocative even to say it: the Jewish Question. It is taboo in the Republic.

Against all insults the Jew is immunized: words like rogue, parasite, deceiver, profiteer [Schieber], affect him like water on a duck's back. Call him Jew, and you will ascertain with astonishment how he is startled, how he is struck, how he suddenly shrinks into himself completely small: "I am recognized."

It is pointless to defend oneself against the Jew. He will proceed lightning-fast from his assuredness to the attack and with his cabalistics [mit seiner Kabalistik] will crush all means of defense in his opponent.

Quickly he makes his opponent into what the opponent wanted to attack in him: the liar, the dusturber of the peace, the terrorist. Nothing would be more wrong than to try to defend oneself against that. Indeed the Jew would like that.

Then he invents new lies daily, against which his opponent must constantly be on the defensive, and the result is that in the midst of loudly defending himself he never gets around to what the Jew really fears: to attack him. The accused has now become the accuser, and with a great shriek he forces the accuser into the dock.

Thus it always went until now, whenever a man or a movement saw the need to combat the Jew. So also would it go for us, if we were not familiar with his nature to the last detail, and if we did not have the courage to derive our radical conclusions from this awareness. And they are:

1. One cannot combat the Jew positively. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the German equation, or it will always spoil the equation.

2. One cannot discuss the Jewish Question with the Jew. Indeed one cannot prove to anybody that one has the right and the duty to render him harmless.

3. One ought not to afford to the Jew in the struggle the means that one affords to every honest opponent; for he is not an honest opponent; he will merely exploit magnanimity and chivalry to place his enemy at a disadvantage.

4. The Jew has no say in German questions. He is a foreigner, an alien to our folk, who enjoys only the right of a guest, and indeed without exception abuses that.

5. The so-called religious morality of the Jew is not a morality but a guide to deception. Therefore it has no claim to the defense and protection of the law.

6. The Jew is not more intelligent than we, but only more sophisticated and cunning. His system cannot be broken economically -- for indeed he fights economically under completely different moral laws than we -- but only politically.

7. A Jew cannot attack the reputation of a German. Jewish smears are only badges of honor for a German who opposes the Jews.

8. The value of a German man or of a German movement rises with the opposition of the Jew. If anyone is fought by the Jew, it absolutely vouches for him. Whoever is not persecuted by the Jew or indeed is praised by him is useless and harmful.

9. The Jew assesses German issues always from the Jewish perspective. Usually therefore the opposite of whatever he says is correct.

10. One must say yes or no to anti-Semitism. Whoever aids the Jew sins against his own people. One can be either a servant of the Jew or an opponent of the Jew. Opposition to the Jew is a matter of personal cleanliness.

With these principles the movement to oppose the Jew has a prospect of success. And therefore such a movement for the first time is taken seriously and feared by the Jew.

That he makes a lot of noise and objects to it, is only a proof that it is correct. We are happy to find the appropriate certification immediately in these lines in the Jewish gazettes. Let them scream terror there. To that we answer with the famous utterance of Mussolini: "Terror? Never! It is social hygiene. We are taking these individuals out of circulation, as a physician takes a bacillus out of the body's circulation."

The Jew - by Joseph Goebbels
"Call him Jew, and you will ascertain with astonishment how he is startled, how he is struck, how he suddenly shrinks into himself completely small: "I am recognized.""

This formula so brilliantly explained by Joseph Goebbels can be used against any other racial enemy.

- Call him a kike
- Call him a nigger
- Call him subhuman

Matt Hale debating non-whites in the radio (Arquimedis Interview).

http://www.resist.com/war_network/ra...sInterview.mp3

This is why the marxists try to approve "hate-speech" laws to prevent the revolutionary power of "racism".

You immediately break the egalitarian racial harmony and draw a line in the sand a frontier between racial enemies.

When you tell a racist joke, when you say a racial slur you say it from a position of superiority and your "target" is on a position of inferiority.

Because you are the attacker, you are striking first and your opponent have to defend itself by reacting to your attack while dealing with emotions like surprise, injured pride and disbelief.

So the "haters" are the revolutionaries and the "non-haters" the reactionaries.

Compare this with the losing proposition of debating with your racial enemies and at same time trying to not hurt their feelings. Saying you don't hate anyone and deny you are a racist or assuming publicly that you respect them because they have positively contributed to our society.



The colored races after the WW2 have been using the Jew formula in the race struggle against white people around the world (independence of European colonies in Africa and Asia, Civil Rights in the US, Apartheid, etc ...).

The Judeo-Communists have been wagering a race war against White people in all these events outside European continent because they didn't saw at the time any potential for communist overthrow in Europe.

Bolshevik Revolution succeeded because a large chunk of the population was very poor and illiterate like in the third world countries today. Communism feeds itself from the hate against the rich minority the dominant classes. Who were the rich dominant classes in Rhodesia? The White folk that settled there.

Judeo-Communists are seeing an opportunity now to make a revolution in Europe with the third world mass immigration. The army of the poor proletarian masses will be made by these millions of subhumans that immigrated to Europe and the bourgeoisie that they want to destroy will the white native europeans that preserved some of Wealth.

But with a different spin because there aren't masses of peasants/proletarians anymore in Europe so the class struggle would be ineffective. This will be literately a race struggle because the biggest division between the population will be made by skin color. The oppressing minority will be the "white privelege" class (a cultural marxist term for white racists) and the oppressed majority will be the so called discriminated minorities (a cultural marxist term for non-white illegal and legal invaders).
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Old April 17th, 2014 #2
Wednesday Owens
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 337
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Against all insults the Jew is immunized: words like rogue, parasite, deceiver, profiteer [Schieber], affect him like water on a duck's back. Call him Jew, and you will ascertain with astonishment how he is startled, how he is struck, how he suddenly shrinks into himself completely small: "I am recognized."

It is pointless to defend oneself against the Jew. He will proceed lightning-fast from his assuredness to the attack and with his cabalistics [mit seiner Kabalistik] will crush all means of defense in his opponent.

Quickly he makes his opponent into what the opponent wanted to attack in him: the liar, the dusturber of the peace, the terrorist. Nothing would be more wrong than to try to defend oneself against that. Indeed the Jew would like that.

Then he invents new lies daily, against which his opponent must constantly be on the defensive, and the result is that in the midst of loudly defending himself he never gets around to what the Jew really fears: to attack him. The accused has now become the accuser, and with a great shriek he forces the accuser into the dock.

This is so true in just the latest reactions to the shooting in KC last Sunday. There are two different WN camps, one is following what Joseph Goebbels suggests (or the Matt Hale person) and the other is doing just the opposite.

The last article by the Heidi woman (can't remember last name) on Mr. Don Black looks just like this point right here:


Then he invents new lies daily, against which his opponent must constantly be on the defensive, and the result is that in the midst of loudly defending himself he never gets around to what the Jew really fears: to attack him. The accused has now become the accuser, and with a great shriek he forces the accuser into the dock.

Thanks for posting this RickHolland, I hope the visitors coming here see this thread.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.
Page generated in 0.06996 seconds.