Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > Our Culture > Vanguard Broadcasting
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old July 3rd, 2005 #1
lawrence dennis
Anti-anti-antisemite
 
lawrence dennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,265
Default Found: The pro-'gay' indoctrination book David Parker was jailed for objecting to

Here is the book that David Parker objected to (mentioned in part 3 of Goyfire #3 titled 'Father Jailed for Homo-Ed')



Who's in a Family? (Paperback)
by Robert Skutch, Laura Nienhaus (Illustrator) "A family can be made up in many different ways..."


Quote:
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Beginning with a traditional nuclear family and ending with blank spaces in which the child reader is instructed to "draw a picture of your family," this slight book catalogues multicultural contemporary family units, including those with single parents, lesbian and gay parents, mixed-race couples, grandparents and divorced parents. Kevin and his brother like their kimono-clad grandmother to help them with their jigsaw puzzles, while Ricky lives with two families. "Aunt Amanda and Uncle Stan," pictured riding in a blue convertible with their pets, "don't have any children at all" but are "still a family," says the narrator, because "they say Mouser and Fred are their 'babies.'" Because "animals have families, too," the text describes elephant, lion, chimpanzee and dog families as well as human families. (A human family headed by a mother is "like the chimpanzee family. [LOL] Mama chimp raises the babies by herself, with the help of any older children she may have.") Nienhaus's lackluster illustrations, the schoolmarmish tone of the text and the comparisons with wild animals all tend to undercut the final definition of a family as "the people who love you the most!" Ages 3-7.

From School Library Journal
Kindergarten-Grade 2--Simple declarative statements move readers from one family configuration to the next, from single children to single parents to same-sex couples. Here and there animal families are juxtaposed with the human, presumably to show that certain situations are natural. For instance, one double-page spread shows a grandmother caring for her two grandsons while their mother is at work. The following page explains that the eldest female is also in charge in elephant families. While this may reassure some youngsters, it could also very well produce more questions than answers. Richly colored although somewhat two-dimensional pencil illustrations show loving families of a variety of races and colors in action. A serviceable, albeit surface, title.--Martha Topol, Northwestern Michigan College, Traverse City, MI
Here are some reader reviews:
Quote:
(*----) what a family should NOT be, May 2, 2005
Glorifying a strange blending of people living together and labeling them a family smacks of brainwashing our young. I ask writers and ther publishers to refrain from using our children as puppets and victims of bizarre adult behavior. Let's maintain the traditional time-honored thousands of years old family structure, - a structure that has served our civilization the best: Daddy, Mommy, and kids.

(*----) A traditional family is not even acknowledged in this book!, April 30, 2005
I can't imagine any normal person giving this book rave reviews. It highlights every dysfunctional family imaginable and suggests it's "normal". It has nearly every "family" configuration EXCEPT a normal, heterosexual male, female, married with children. This book is everything normal people reject and discourage their kids from seeking. It belongs in the circular file near your desk or better yet, a shreader would serve it well. It deserves -5 *****
__________________

How is the faithful city become an harlot! It was full of judgment: righteousness lodged in it, but now murderers. Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water. Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards.

Xian WN!

"The Jew can only be understood if it is known what he strives for: ... the destruction of the world.... [it is] the tragedy of Lucifer."

Holy-Hoax Exposed, Hollow-Cost Examined, How Low Cost? (toons)
 
Old July 4th, 2005 #2
lawrence dennis
Anti-anti-antisemite
 
lawrence dennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,265
Default David Parker's protest in a larger context

The title of the article refers to 'Govt. has taken control [of children] away from parents' and hence parents have 'lost' control and thus are 'out' of control.

Out of Control Parents
by Nedd Kareiva
Quote:
Today's American parents are out of control. No, I don't mean they are wreaking havoc on society by an almost anything goes lifestyle, though there certainly are some that exist in our day and age. I do not believe those are a majority of your apple pie Americans.
Quote:

What I do mean by America's parents being out of control is that due to governmental forces, abuses, unconstitutional laws and power hungry officials, mothers and fathers are being stifled in their ability to raise their children as they see fit. Parental roles are increasingly undermined by governments and government sanctioned agencies. They are losing control of their children. As such, governments have by fiat assumed control of our kids in various parts of the country. Two of governments' chief underlings are public schools and so-called state's Child Protective Services, often under a different label, depending on the state you live.

Let's paint a picture of our decaying public school system. In much of America, this is not your father's or mother's public schools where the 3 R's were once faithfully and rigidly taught. It is no longer a system where you worked darn hard to make sure you advanced a grade or you would be kept back. It is no longer a system where if you got out of hand, your teacher would call your parents to tell them. If you were really bad, your teacher might just take the trusty old school ruler and crack you on the wrist or hand until you got in line. Parents were kings and queens and were extensions of the school's moral order. They worked closely with school officials. They defended school officials instead of their children when children misbehaved. And you didn't very often have the likes of the American Civil Liberties Union meddling.

But no more. If today's good teachers and other school officials try administering discipline to out of order children, the ACLU will be in like a swarm of bees waiting to litigate. And whereas teachers in the past determined to educate our children, many of today's teachers are actively undermining the role of parents with an agenda. A couple examples of that is the National Education Association's support of Planned Parenthood and the teaching of homosexuality.

Gay/Straight Alliances (GSAs), probably the most widely known element of the homosexual agenda, have sprouted heavily in schools all across America over the past decade. School officials refusing to allow them faced legal threats and coercion from the ACLU to comply. One such district was in Boyd County, Kentucky in 2004. Despite widespread opposition from parents and ministers, the ACLU and a court forced Boyd County High School to allow a GSA on its campus. The litigation director of the ACLU's Gay & Lesbian Rights Project, Jim Esseks, was quoted as saying "Parents don't get to say I don't want you to teach evolution or this, that or whatever else. If parents don't like it, they can homeschool, they can go to a private school, they can go to a religious school.".

Mr. Esseks' idea sounds like an excellent one to me because in the end, the school did not allow students to opt out of the pro-homosexual training that the ACLU foisted on them, though a third of the high school students stayed home on the first ever day of training.


Another example of how parents are helpless against schools on this agenda was a recent case of a Massachusetts dad whose son brought home a storybook containing pictures of homosexual characters. He requested school officials notify him when anything homosexual is taught in the schools. When the school refused to grant David Parker's wishes, he went to the school and demanded action. When he would not leave school property without a YES answer, he was arrested. Such a case is a logical progression in the first state where homosexual marriage was foisted by the Massachusetts Supreme Court.

In California, pro-homosexual curricula is taught in schools throughout the state, often without parental knowledge or consent. And similar to Kentucky, thanks to litigation from the ACLU, one school district was forced to have students to take "anti-gay harassment" training. On top of that, all school personnel, regardless of status and job title, were mandated to take a pro-homosexual sensitivity class.

... the homosexual agenda is ... is by no means the only issue. School officials in some districts won't hesitate to give a girl a birth control pill or take her for an abortion if she is pregnant. And the parents will likely never know that their roles as parents were undermined unless their daughters tell them. This is quite common in states like New York, Massachusetts, California, Oregon and Washington state.

The newest area where parents, like me, may be subject to losing control of our children is in Illinois. A program known as the Illinois Children's Mental Health Partnership (ICMHP), signed into law in 2003, is scheduled for implementation at the end of June. The program, in which Illinois was the first in America to sign on, was introduced under an initiative known as President Bush's New Freedom Report. It has received attention from all over America, Canada and overseas and is frightening parents who are concerned as to what may happen to their children who end up in it.

Schools will be instructed to look for students who may appear to be depressed, disoriented or with perceived negative mental traits and subject to so-called screenings and developmental corrections. Schools will not be the only institutions implementing this program which will cover children from birth to 18. Hospitals and mental health centers will be looking for mothers who recently gave birth to participate in this program to test for depression and possibly other things. Such programs appear to be muscled in by the pharmaceutical industry and are ominous in nature because of the subversive nature of the program.

----- SNIP -----

Is it not disturbing to think that if you don't want your kids to be taught sexuality, especially homosexuality, outside the home, you might be subject to action from school districts which have been given an indirect law enforcement powers by state legislatures?

Is it not troubling to think that a school official could take your daughter, without your permission, to a Planned Parenthood clinic and obtain birth control pills or if pregnant, an abortion, and you may never find out?

Is it not frightening to think that your children can be forced to be vaccinated against your will and if you don't comply, you can be in trouble with the law?

Is it not appalling that you can be fined an outrageous amount of money or be arrested if you don't force your children to wear a seat belt, even if they cannot comfortably buckle up?

Is it not terrifying that if you don't obey a doctor's wishes to get a certain medical treatment for your child, that CPS or the police might come in and dictate what to do? And if you don't follow thru after their lectures, you could lose custody or your own blood son or daughter.

Is it not horrifying to think that you and your children may be subject to mental health initiatives by so-called experts in the mental health field. Can you say Auschwitz? ["Oy! Improper use of HolyCo$t comparison, case Number 4,503,227."--L.D.]

If there is ever a time parents must take authority of their children, it is now. Absent clear cut physical abuse or neglect of a child, schools, states and governments have absolutely no business interfering in family matters. Whether a child goes thru certain medical procedures, absent clear cut life and death matters, such are parental decisions, not the government's. Governments may feel free to offer their views on items like safety and health but no right is more sacred than for parents right to raise our children as we see fit and are taught.

----- SNIP -----



__________________

How is the faithful city become an harlot! It was full of judgment: righteousness lodged in it, but now murderers. Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water. Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards.

Xian WN!

"The Jew can only be understood if it is known what he strives for: ... the destruction of the world.... [it is] the tragedy of Lucifer."

Holy-Hoax Exposed, Hollow-Cost Examined, How Low Cost? (toons)
 
Old July 5th, 2005 #3
zodiac17603
Junior Member
 
zodiac17603's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA USA
Posts: 38
Default Grand Ma Was Correct!!!!

Yep, Grand Ma knew what she was talking about .... Years ago ... When they started a program called KINDERGARDEN.

It's moved forward now they have state run daycare and PK.

It's out lined very well in the book "The Naked Communist"!!!!
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.
Page generated in 0.18241 seconds.