Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 22nd, 2009 #21
Jon Brozek
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Default

I will download it and suffer through it this weekend just so that I can give it a scene by scene review. A review from OUR side.
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #22
albion
Senior Member
 
albion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,499
Blog Entries: 2
Default

 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #23
vladmir
Why are JEWS at my table?
 
vladmir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 1,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albion View Post
Tarantino is very Jooish looking IMHO,...this snuff film confirms what I have thought for a very long time.
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #24
albion
Senior Member
 
albion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,499
Blog Entries: 2
Default


Tarantino at the Scream Awards, October 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quentin...ino#Early_life

Tarantino was born in Knoxville, Tennessee, the son of Connie Zastoupil (née McHugh), a health care executive and nurse, and Tony Tarantino, an actor and amateur musician born in Queens, New York. Tarantino's father is Italian American and his mother is of Irish and Cherokee Native American ancestry. Dropping out of Narbonne High School in Harbor City, California at the age of 15, he went on to learn acting at the James Best Theatre Company. At the age of 22, he landed a job at the Manhattan Beach Video Archives, a now defunct video rental store in Manhattan Beach,
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #25
vladmir
Why are JEWS at my table?
 
vladmir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 1,526
Default

You Know something Alnion,...Act like a kike, look like a kike,= KIKE,... simple formula,... not rocket science pal.
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #26
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gott View Post
Isn't the movie the typical Tarantino rip off/remake of a sleazy exploitation movie from the 70s? An Italian film, I think? Anybody know for sure?
Do you mean the disgusting jew 'films' 'SS Experiment Love Camp' and 'Ilse: She-Wolf of the SS' per chance?
__________________
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #27
Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Do you mean the disgusting jew 'films' 'SS Experiment Love Camp' and 'Ilse: She-Wolf of the SS' per chance?
No, an Italian film with exactly the same plot as the Tarantino film, the same way Reservoir Dogs has the same plot (failed jewelry store heist) as the Hong Kong action picture City on Fire by Ringo Lam. His films are often literal copies of other people's films with sometimes clever touches around the edges. He was once a pretty clever fellow. So, in the same sleazy semi porn, semi snuff 'genre' as Ilse and such, but a more literal copy of one in particular (which, I think even has the same title as the Tarantino movie, only in Italian). Stefan would know the name, probably. How bout it Stef?
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #28
Stefan Francis
Blue Eyed Dissenter
 
Stefan Francis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Leftist New England.
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gott View Post
Stefan would know the name, probably. How bout it Stef?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076584/

The_Inglorious_Bastards The_Inglorious_Bastards

There you go. The name is the same (except the obvious spelling errors) but the content is different I believe. I am not sure.
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #29
Duke Mitchell
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 236
Default

Tarantino boasted in an interview how he didn't do any research about WWII for the film and that he knows very little about WWII outside of what he has seen in other movies and on TV, (even though he is making a million dollar nation wide film about it).

He was actually bragging that he doesn't know anything about real WWII history.

Yet people will watch his movie and believe it is straight out of the history books.

(He also gave the required "I'm white, but not white" line about he himself being of partial Cherokee ancestry -- Yeah, right. A regular Geronimo you are, buddy. )
 
Old August 22nd, 2009 #30
Rick Wright
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 107
Thumbs down

This is reportedly the #1 movie this weekend that proves Red State Americans are still eating up the WWII obsession by the plateful.
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #31
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
Default

[quote=A.S.;1040067]
Quote:
Yeah that's only if you're talking about doing it under the Jew's terms (using mainstream media)

I think he was referring to an indie/underground flick, and it's a great idea. Go balls out, don't disguise it in the least. Make the movie about exacting revenge on these jewish rats - 10,000 eyes for an eye.
Yes, that's correct. Fuck "cleverly" trying to tippy-toe around the Shmuel the Gatekeeper; the cunt never sleeps. Reach for Prince Albert in a can 'n' roll yer own.

And there could be a few shabbos goy jugulars opened in such a film as well: anti-racist turds; open borders-advocating money-grubbers, leftist foundation heads, etc.

Quote:
On another note, Brad Pitt has got to be one of the lowest forms of life on the planet. Yeah "fuck Nazis" right Brad? "Kill Nazis" right Brad? Really cool theme there Brad. Stupid acting too. You look and sound like an idiot with that forced accent and stupid mustache, it's fucking pathetic. Those evil Nazis, how dare they be civilized and not want to be ruled by kikes. Better to kiss fat jew ass (Weinsten brothers), marry a bony skank, become submissive toward her, and wallow in filth with mud kids, right Brad?

What a fuckin douche.
Throw a character very much like him onto the cinematic morgue slab, too....
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #32
Bassanio
Hath not a Goy eyes?
 
Bassanio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Venice
Posts: 4,287
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
On another note, Brad Pitt has got to be one of the lowest forms of life on the planet. Yeah "fuck Nazis" right Brad? "Kill Nazis" right Brad? Really cool theme there Brad. Stupid acting too. You look and sound like an idiot with that forced accent and stupid mustache, it's fucking pathetic. Those evil Nazis, how dare they be civilized and not want to be ruled by kikes. Better to kiss fat jew ass (Weinsten brothers), marry a bony skank, become submissive toward her, and wallow in filth with mud kids, right Brad?

What a fuckin douche.
Brad Pitt is a functioning retard. I understood this after I watched a few unscripted interviews with him.
__________________
The Goy cries out in ecstasy as the Jew strikes him.
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #33
Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Wright View Post
This is reportedly the #1 movie this weekend that proves Red State Americans are still eating up the WWII obsession by the plateful.
Opening big movies are usually the #1 over the first weekend. I don't follow this much anymore, but were there any other big openings in competition with the Tarantino? I don't think there were, off hand. This is also pretty late for a potential summer blockbuster - which usually means something is wrong. In other words, it was intentionally slotted to open after potentially dangerous competition had already opened.

I get some cable stations and they have been incessantly showing the trailer (which is expensive to do) and somewhere, I heard an interview with the kike producer (Weinstein?) - heavy saturation publicity right before the opening.

A movie I like a lot is Showgirls. Showgirls also had a big opening week - and then died. Whether or not a movie has legs determines whether it is going to be a commercial success or not. If attendance falls off substantially by the second weekend - it is a certified flop. We will see.

Tarantino brags about not knowing anything about the war? Tarantino doesn't know anything about anything else either, and brags about that too. All he knows is the LA scene and what is necessary to be cool. Take a look at the pictures posted in this thread (of the director). He is a good example of the typical movie director today - no real life because he is so lacking in what it takes to have one. Thusly, he desperately needs a fantasy life to compensate. In order to have the need and the drive to do this for a living and keep on doing it, there usually has to be a real void in one's life. This goes for the best - Hitchcock and Hawks for instance had very active fantasy lives but they also had a lot going on in phsysical reality too - for one thing, they worked all the time, while movie makers today hardly work at all (one picture ever 4 or 5 years). Looking at stupid jerks like Spielberg and Tarantino what do you see? Well, first off, just listen to them - they are indeed very stupid. Obviously they have no inner resources. And, most of the time, they sit around striking poses because they actually make movies very rarely. They were both anathamatized class nerds in high school, and while kids can be cruel just for the sake of being cruel, sometimes there are reasons. Both these guys are genuine creeps, as contemporary movie makers rather remarkably tend to be. Spielberg still blubbers about how he was picked on in school. Of course, Tarantino never even made it through high school, that's how big a loser this guy really is. Oh yeah, also, they are very ugly indeed. If they were not rich and famous for their very cool (LOL) movies they would have nothing, because, actually, they are nothing. Cool movies, that is and by the way, to an audience of 14 year old, pimply faced nerds who, when not looking at their pictures and others like them, play video games. Ever see or hear Peter Jackson? I mean, really, these guys are pretty frightening and at a party I would think any halfway normal person would give all of them a very wide berth.

Looked at objective, Tarantino is hopelessly uncool, a really cosmic scaled geek, nerd and spastic jerk who, in exchange for being the required negative role model (stupid, with no education, painfully nerdy and ugly) he is, and who has the necessary filmmaking skills to turn out the simpleminded crap he makes, has been suitably rewarded by the jews. Now, he can grant Weinstein an interview at 'his pool in Beverly Hills,' he can wear shiny, bad taste (for whites, good taste for jews and niggers) suits and designer sunglasses and he has people listening to rather than laughing at him. His coke snorting entourage (at Tartantino's expense - his treat always and frequently) of ass kissers hastens to remind him frequently that he is a 'genius,' (the 'critic quoted somewhere in this thread, for instance). These are the whores and pimps. It's the men who manage and control, who are 'the critics,' who do the logistics - IE 'the entertainment industry' - who are spot lit by Verhoeven in Showgirls, not the strippers. It's a hermetically sealed club where everyone tells everyone else how wonderful, what geniuses, they are. Verhoeven looked at the whole rotten mess fairly and objectively (without the designer sunglasses) and that is why the racket will never forgive him.

Tarantino is just another weird whore serving his masters. Anyway, whether this piece of shit has legs will determine it's box office fate, and that of the director. I wonder how Grind House did the first weekend. Anybody know?

Oh - somebody mentioned he is heavy on the hooch as well as the coke. Usually they are mutually exclusive in the Hollywood crowd, but from looking at that slack, bloated mug of his, and from looking at his last, really crazy (and not in any intentional ways but in how it reveals the ruin that is the director), I can easily believe it. Traditionally, the big drug guys in Hollywood wind up losing absolutely everything. That too, we can all hope the future holds for Mr. Tarantino.

Last edited by Gott; August 23rd, 2009 at 10:45 AM.
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #34
Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Brozek View Post
I will download it and suffer through it this weekend just so that I can give it a scene by scene review. A review from OUR side.
When you do see it and post, please give the running time.
Best to you,
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #35
Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassanio View Post
Brad Pitt is a functioning retard. I understood this after I watched a few unscripted interviews with him.
Years ago I got dragged to see Themla and Louise (my God, what a piece of shit) by a woman. After it was over she squealed and squeaked endlessly about how hot and sexy, etc. etc, Brad Pitt was. Visceral disgust is what I had felt in watching him in the film, and I had a hard time at first believing she meant what she was saying. But she did. And after the stupid women fell for his supposed charms, I then in later years (IE Fight Club) saw that Pitt was sort of a role model for young guys too.

This is why the kikes put the money they do into all of this shit. Jews are tight with money, they don't throw it away, ever. Propaganda, in this case, negative role models, works. Positive ones work better, they are easier to sell, that's why the kikes do everything they can to see that none make it through to the public. That's why I have the little hope (as opposed to none) I have Bassanio. If people are given even half a chance, they will go for the good rather than the bad. The jews agree, that's why they are so desperate than absolutely nothing good ever makes it through. As Stefan mentioned recently, it is very rare to see anyone moving from the right (the real right) to the left, but not at all uncommon to see people moving from the left to the right.
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #36
Stefan Francis
Blue Eyed Dissenter
 
Stefan Francis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Leftist New England.
Posts: 85
Default

Current US theater running time: 149 min!

Wasn't 'Dogs' somewhat shorter? I remember it moving along at a decent pace as well. His recent films are clunky and bizarre...it is as if he mistakes those 70's grindhouse films as 'art' and shamelessly mimics them in an attempt to prove his 'coolness' . It is nowhere more apparent than in 'Basterds' from what I can ascertain.
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #37
Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan Francis View Post
Current US theater running time: 149 min!

Wasn't 'Dogs' somewhat shorter? I remember it moving along at a decent pace as well. His recent films are clunky and bizarre...it is as if he mistakes those 70's grindhouse films as 'art' and shamelessly mimics them in an attempt to prove his 'coolness' . It is nowhere more apparent than in 'Basterds' from what I can ascertain.
100 minutes (around there, anyway). His shortest film, by far. Both Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown are 157 (if I remember right), with Kill Bill so long it was in 2 parts and Grind House (or is it Grindhouse?) around 180. He wasn't famous enough to insist on gargantuan running times when he made Dogs.

This is odd: I just got an email from a guy who is also into movies the way we are, Stef, and this is what he has to say -

I just saw Tarantino's latest film, Inglorious Basterds. It was a lot of
fun, made with a lot of style, as most of his movies are. Nothing like the
art of Resevior Dogs, so I dont know if you'd like it, but as always you
can see his love of film and how cool he wants to be. Think you might see
it?

This guy doesn't know about my ah...secret life(?) as a NS, and he doesn't have any discrimination (but he is potentially smart as he has a good mind). I find it very interesting that he uses 'cool' as in 'how cool he wants to be.' He doesn't realize that 'made with a lot of style,' actually means empty effects. And Tarantino does love film (with no discrimination at all). Even if the author of the email can't (hopefully yet) connect the dots, he does go to the heart of what Tarantino is about. Notice no mention of the subject matter as there isn't any. Tarantino makes movies about nothing.

Last edited by Gott; August 23rd, 2009 at 11:21 AM.
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #38
Stefan Francis
Blue Eyed Dissenter
 
Stefan Francis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Leftist New England.
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gott View Post
As Stefan mentioned recently, it is very rare to see anyone moving from the right (the real right) to the left, but not at all uncommon to see people moving from the left to the right.
And to give credit where it is due...I paraphrased Alex, but I forget the original wording and/or context. Honesty is still a virtue...right? Although I doubt any kikes would agree...
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #39
Stefan Francis
Blue Eyed Dissenter
 
Stefan Francis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Leftist New England.
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gott View Post
100 minutes (around there, anyway). His shortest film, by far. Both Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown are 157 (if I remember right), with Kill Bill so long it was in 2 parts and Grind House (or is it Grindhouse?) around 180. He wasn't famous enough to insist on gargantuan running times when he made Dogs.
I didn't mind 'Dogs' because I don't recall it pushing a particular agenda. The same cannot be said about his later films... Jackie Brown is an excellent example of his 'style over substance' motif. It was too damn quirky for its own good...although I can't say that I didn't mind when Bridget Fonda was shot in the parking lot. Muahah!
 
Old August 23rd, 2009 #40
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gott View Post
This is why the kikes put the money they do into all of this shit. Jews are tight with money, they don't throw it away, ever.
Jews are tight with money, but they will happily spend it if the payoff for them personally, not for all jews, is worth it (i.e. their level of personal benefit thought of in both material and non-material terms). If you've noticed the stratification of jewish dominated sections of industry and society, historically and currently, are heavily linked to opinion-making and exercising personal control by getting your audience to repeat your ideas and positions as if they were their own (and they don't always get paid for it).

Quote:
Propaganda, in this case, negative role models, works. Positive ones work better, they are easier to sell, that's why the kikes do everything they can to see that none make it through to the public.
Ever read Jacques Ellul's 'Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes'? I ask because you just summarised something he discusses at the end of his first chapter. Although personally I'd make a few qualifications it is immaterial to thread's topic really.

Quote:
The jews agree, that's why they are so desperate than absolutely nothing good ever makes it through.
I'd suggest that's more a collective and individual ego trip of 'you must listen to us', because 'we are the Chosen (of Hashem)', than anything more deliberate (the latter is an intellectualisation without factoring in race). The effect is to bounce people between sets of jews all championing their ideas as personal ego-trips (the 'marketplace of ideas' might as well be called the 'marketplace of the jews') and I haven't seen any cogent evidence that this is a conscious strategy, but rather an effect of having jews loose in a society.

Quote:
As Stefan mentioned recently, it is very rare to see anyone moving from the right (the real right) to the left, but not at all uncommon to see people moving from the left to the right.
I wouldn't say it is quite so rare, but only among what you'd call the intellectual elite among your average member of the radical right it is very rare. Since the radical right by nature shares some of the basic concerns the far left does and there are certainly some major intellectual groups on the radical right that purport leftist ideas (such as Groupement de recherche et d'études pour la civilisation européenne [GRECE: one of Benoist's outfits] for example).
__________________
 
Reply

Tags
anti-german film, fiction, hollywood, hymewood, jewish snuff film, tarantino

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.
Page generated in 0.50236 seconds.