#1 Charlottesville Thread

[Wednesday Owens]

4Chan. It is a seriously effective tool.
Great update Tremley14.

If you can't get it there, you can't get it anywhere.

[Tremley14]

To write Chris Cantwell who was denied bail and is looking up to 60 years

Christopher Cantwell #631424
160 Peregory Lane
Charlottesville, VA. 22902

Does anyone have info about how to write to the other 3 guys that were also arrested? Or how I can get it?

18-year-old Daniel Borden of Mason, Ohio, and Richard Preston, 52, of Maryland, and Alex Michael Ramos

Edit
Just found this for Daniel Borden



MAIL AND MONEY ORDERS
All mail and money orders should be addressed to:
INMATE’S NAME AND ID NUMBER
Hamilton County Justice Center
900 Sycamore St., Cincinnati, OH 45202
The inmate’s ID Number must be on all money orders. No checks accepted. All incoming mail will be inspected for contraband.
Money can now be deposited to an inmate’s account using a credit card via the Internet (a processing fee applies). Deposits post immediately to the inmate’s account. https://www.commissarydeposit.com/De...7-6270c4fe17f9

[Emily Henderson]

Originally Posted by Tremley14

To write Chris Cantwell who was denied bail and is looking up to 60 years

Christopher Cantwell #631424
160 Peregory Lane
Charlottesville, VA. 22902

Does anyone have info about how to write to the other 3 guys that were also arrested? Or how I can get it?

18-year-old Daniel Borden of Mason, Ohio, and Richard Preston, 52, of Maryland, and Alex Michael Ramos

Edit
Just found this for Daniel Borden



MAIL AND MONEY ORDERS
All mail and money orders should be addressed to:
INMATE’S NAME AND ID NUMBER
Hamilton County Justice Center
900 Sycamore St., Cincinnati, OH 45202
The inmate’s ID Number must be on all money orders. No checks accepted. All incoming mail will be inspected for contraband.
Money can now be deposited to an inmate’s account using a credit card via the Internet (a processing fee applies). Deposits post immediately to the inmate’s account. https://www.commissarydeposit.com/De...7-6270c4fe17f9

If Daniel is still in Hamilton than Preston might still be in Baltimore County Jail.

He's from Indiana, and there is no Baltimore Co jail in IN or VA, only MD, but don't know if that's where he is, you'd need more research:

"..720 Bosley Ave, Towson, MD 21204.."

http://www.baltimorecountymd.gov/agencies/corrections/

Don't know on Ramos. He's beaner but still wrongfully accused beaner me thinks.

[Alex Linder]

confirmed fatty died of heart attack - see her obese parents
https://www.nbcnews.com/video/heathe...-1028340803735

apparently fatties are difficult to revive...another reason not to be obese

[Emily Henderson]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

confirmed fatty died of heart attack - see her obese parents
https://www.nbcnews.com/video/heathe...-1028340803735

apparently fatties are difficult to revive...another reason not to be obese

They'll still say car whack 'set in motion' events that caused heart to go into heart attack mode...


...Won't say Antifa attack on car 'set in motion' event that caused car to whack girl whose heart went into heart attack mode. Unless court appointed crum-bum Atty points it out.

Also, these large parents could sue Antifa groups and their funders, as well as City who told police to stand down and enable violence, for death of daughter.

Would rather give 'Karma to Nazis'.

Standing in road to do that was bizarre--if your child just died you wouldn't want to be looked at if you're normal-just my personal opinion. You could visit that spot alone anytime, no cameras or mikes.

[N.B. Forrest]

Mebbe karma slaughtered your shitlib sow of a daughter, eh?

There ought to be a law that prohibits the grossly obese from exposing their repulsive flesh in public: no arm exposure above the elbows, at least. UGH....

Also, these large parents could sue Antifa groups and their funders, as well as City who told police to stand down and enable violence, for death of daughter.

That would be the logical thing to do - since of course those are the scum directly responsible - but it will never happen: they're shitlibs themselves, basking in the fake loving embrace of the commies who're lying that Heifer is a martyr.

[Ironguard1940]

A malfunction caused the chopper crash.

http://www.richmond.com/news/virgini...8c938c205.html

I thought the White nationalists shot it down with a SAM but alas, no.

http://www.wbir.com/news/local/ntsb-...ject/471180927

Oh, and do not forget this rather important piece of information-that chopper had crashed in 2010, receiving very heavy damage.

http://www.richmond.com/news/local/c...b785c44a0.html

[Ironguard1940]

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/pro...cid=spartandhp

The Charlottesville SSR's politburo has done everything in its power, and in some cases illegally, to appease the communists there and still the commies disrupt every meeting there. I can easily believe that the Berkeley of the East voted 78% for Hil LIE ary.

God DAMN if only Custer had burned that city down. The city leaders pussed out and surrendered to keep that from happening. Like they are doing now.

[Tremley14]

Originally Posted by Tremley14

To write Chris Cantwell who was denied bail and is looking up to 60 years

Christopher Cantwell #631424
160 Peregory Lane
Charlottesville, VA. 22902

Does anyone have info about how to write to the other 3 guys that were also arrested? Or how I can get it?

18-year-old Daniel Borden of Mason, Ohio, and Richard Preston, 52, of Maryland, and Alex Michael Ramos

Edit
Just found this for Daniel Borden



MAIL AND MONEY ORDERS
All mail and money orders should be addressed to:
INMATE’S NAME AND ID NUMBER
Hamilton County Justice Center
900 Sycamore St., Cincinnati, OH 45202
The inmate’s ID Number must be on all money orders. No checks accepted. All incoming mail will be inspected for contraband.
Money can now be deposited to an inmate’s account using a credit card via the Internet (a processing fee applies). Deposits post immediately to the inmate’s account. https://www.commissarydeposit.com/De...7-6270c4fe17f9

I just wrote the kid a letter and sent him $25.
I spent only 72 hours in Jail when I was younger, and it sucked!

[Tremley14]

Originally Posted by Wednesday Owens

4Chan. It is a seriously effective tool.
Great update Tremley14.

If you can't get it there, you can't get it anywhere.

Yes. They are doing a awesome job doxing these queers. Check this thread out on Twitter
https://twitter.com/polreport/status/905787911571771392

[Wednesday Owens]

Originally Posted by Tremley14

Yes. They are doing a awesome job doxing these queers. Check this thread out on Twitter
https://twitter.com/polreport/status/905787911571771392

Freaking beautiful. I love my people, especially when they are royally PO'ed.

[Alex Linder]

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...or-assistance/

[littlefieldjohn]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...or-assistance/

For sure ; "judgement calls" to use the term loosely , from dumb cowards.

[LeoFrank]

Is there anything that can be done to bring a class action lawsuit against the Government of Virginia and police for kettling the two sides together, one side was there legally and for peaceful get together, the other side was there with siege weapons looking to initiate violence.

[LeoFrank]

http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/...sville-fiasco/

http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/...y-of-virginia/

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=82788

http://cosmicconvergence.org/?p=21787

http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/...s-ages-matter/

http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/...-of-the-c-i-a/

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=82141

http://cosmicconvergence.org/?p=21716

[littlefieldjohn]

Originally Posted by LeoFrank

Is there anything that can be done to bring a class action lawsuit against the Government of Virginia and police for kettling the two sides together, one side was there legally and for peaceful get together, the other side was there with siege weapons looking to initiate violence.

Don't expect very much with ,in LInder's words, "low IQ coons" in power positions.

[littlefieldjohn]

Originally Posted by Wednesday Owens

Freaking beautiful. I love my people, especially when they are royally PO'ed.

Retain solidarity & ignore any establishment -directed dissension. We are in a better position with a strong foothold .

[LeoFrank]

No matter if the outcome is "it was all a waste of time" there should be efforts to take the government and police to court, even if nothing comes of it, the nation would see that the rallygoers did not give up and it would show the whole world how corrupt the government is in fact.

[littlefieldjohn]

Originally Posted by LeoFrank

No matter if the outcome is "it was all a waste of time" there should be efforts to take the government and police to court, even if nothing comes of it, the nation would see that the rallygoers did not give up and it would show the whole world how corrupt the government is in fact.

For sure, although the "defense" will be prolonged since we are not on equal footing with the jewdicial system.

[Emily Henderson]

Originally Posted by LeoFrank

No matter if the outcome is "it was all a waste of time" there should be efforts to take the government and police to court, even if nothing comes of it, the nation would see that the rallygoers did not give up and it would show the whole world how corrupt the government is in fact.

http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/guard/ch5.htm

^^What that lays out is how to sue a police department for abuses, since they usually are granted immunity.

What the article doesn't touch on is that successful suit against a City or PD for systemic abuses will also result in no cap on damages for civil liability, regardless of tort reform laws in that State.

Meaning that if a cap on damages is $250,000, you can get an amount exceeding that if you win suit and meet the requirements under the Statute.

The 'training' thing is referring to proof that the Dept. has 'systemic' issues, and has acted in the same manner, without making changes no matter what probs have been caused, over and over. You have to prove they (the Chief) were aware of the problem (particular employees who did not follow protocol, incorrect protocol being endorsed by superior officers, etc.) and did not correct it.
The standard can also be met when you catch them (blue nigs) lying. There was a case of an unlawful arrest where they manhandled a man at Wal-Mart in Austin--all the cops lied, as was made available from dash cam vids and store vids from multiple angles.

They further proved the PD had several of these officers behave in the same manner with other cases, and the situation was not corrected, including other times when they were caught lying. Because of all this, the Wal-Mart guy won a large settlement.

The key concept is 'causation'.

In order to sue the whole municipality/PD, you have to prove that their practices as an entity are the cause of the civil rights violation.

Considering how many times Antifa have been enabled to attack rally-goers, I think it would be do-able.

Excerpt:

"..Remedies and Legal Developments

In Who Is Guarding the Guardians? the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights detailed the remedies available for victims of police misconduct. Since Guardians’ publication, only minor changes have occurred in the use of civil lawsuits by individuals against police officers at the state or federal level. Twenty years ago, case law provided that the government did not have authority to seek injunctive relief for police misconduct.[1] In Guardians, the Commission recommended that Congress enact legislation that would give the Attorney General the authority denied to the government by controlling case law, namely, the authority to enjoin proven patterns or practices of misconduct in a given law enforcement department. In 1994, such legislation was finally passed, adding an additional federal civil remedy.[2]
This chapter reviews the pattern or practice authority as well as other remedies and legal developments over the past 20 years. Additionally, it highlights state legislation and proposed federal bills that mandate collection of statistics relating to race, age, and gender of those who come into contact with law enforcement officers.
CIVIL ACTIONS BY VICTIMS OF POLICE MISCONDUCT
The Commission has concluded in various reports that civil lawsuits against individual police officers may help deter police misconduct.[3] While there are several avenues one may pursue when using civil lawsuits as a remedy, state and federal law limit the effectiveness of this remedy.[4]
Civil Remedies under State Law
The most common avenue of redress available to victims of police abuse is initiating a civil action for damages under state law.[5] Police misconduct may constitute a tort for which a victim may sue for damages. In general, these lawsuits involve allegations of false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, assault, battery, or wrongful death.[6] As pointed out in Guardians, there are advantages and disadvantages to the victim when filing a state civil lawsuit. Advantages include a lower burden of proof than required in a criminal case, the fact that the victim may personally initiate the action, and the possibility of direct compensation to the victim.[7] Disadvantages include costly and time-consuming litigation and the fact that police officers ultimately may be judgment-proof and protected by sovereign immunity.[8] Even in cases where the victims of police misconduct are successful in their lawsuits, they rarely work to hold police departments or individual officers accountable for their actions.[9]
Civil Remedies under Federal Law
Most civil actions against police officers for misconduct are filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.[10] However, it is difficult to succeed in § 1983 claims against police officers, and the successes in § 1983 claims do not necessarily result in changes in police practices.[11] Further, judicially imposed barriers limit the value of remedies under § 1983. One barrier is the doctrine of immunity that protects individual police officers from lawsuits.[12] As Robert Louden and Hubert Williams discussed at the Commission’s June 2000 briefing on national police practices and civil rights, defendant officers are usually indemnified by the municipalities or unions if an alleged misconduct is within the line of duty.[13] Therefore, there is no real incentive for police officers to change their practices to ensure that individual rights are protected. In Guardians, the Commission argued that § 1983 claims have not been effective in deterring police misconduct[14] and without much change in police practices, § 1983 continues to be ineffective in deterring police misconduct.
One measure for deterrence of police misconduct is the implementation of overall changes in departmental and agency policy. And one way to bring changes in policy is to impose liability on the department or the agency itself for misconduct of its officers. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York[15] made it possible for victims of police misconduct to sue police departments and impose liability on the municipalities themselves for the actions of their employees.[16] The Monell Court held that civil rights violations committed by public employees might impose liability on the government if it is shown the violation is the result of poor training or poor supervision.[17] James Fyfe believes that the legal standard first articulated in Monell was a catalyst in changing policing by encouraging police administrations to develop a police standard of care in dealing with the public.[18] He opined that suits against municipalities have resulted in policy changes that have made a great difference in deterring police misconduct.[19] Dr. Fyfe, however, cited two problems with municipal liability. First, many police chiefs see liability as a cost of doing business and the effect of losing a $10- or $12-million lawsuit does not have an impact on police operations.[20] Second, no one in the police department is made aware of the results of the lawsuit, and none of the policy implications of the lawsuits are acted upon.[21]
As articulated by the Monell Court, “municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a tortfeaser—or, in other words, a municipality cannot be held liable under § 1983 on a respondeat superior theory.”[22] The presiding judge, therefore, can only impose liability if the municipality caused the injury.[23] The question of a direct causal link between a municipal policy or custom and the alleged misconduct is a difficult inquiry, leaving the U.S. Supreme Court deeply divided.[24] Further, the Court and Congress have not clearly defined what constitutes municipal policy, and this adds to the difficulty in winning claims under § 1983.[25]
Since Monell, the Supreme Court has re-examined the issue of municipal liability in various cases.."