|
May 6th, 2015 | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
Needs a better name. Blood is off-putting.
|
May 6th, 2015 | #42 |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Why have 300,000,000 dumbshits trying to lead a movement instead of subservience to the best of them?
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
May 6th, 2015 | #43 |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Menstrual Nationalism
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
May 6th, 2015 | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Quote:
To lead a movement, you have to first define the movement, define what constitutes success or failure. Otherwise it's just a muddle.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
|
May 6th, 2015 | #45 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Does it preach "conservatism"? Well, what exactly do you mean in this context (I think you mean "Jew-denial", but if something else please elaborate)?
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
||||||
May 6th, 2015 | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Can also call it true nationalism (and the competing ideologies are pseudo-nationalism).
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
May 6th, 2015 | #47 |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
May 6th, 2015 | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,093
|
That's the verbal equivalent of penile injecting Kay Y jelly into another man's rectal cavity - or gay as hell. And at no point in time is everyone going to agree to accept semen slurping homos like you into society. Your ideas are nothing more than a queer's wet dream.
|
May 6th, 2015 | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
HIV+ blood nationalism?
|
May 6th, 2015 | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,093
|
|
May 6th, 2015 | #51 |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
You guys need to be more positive ~Witzgall
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
May 6th, 2015 | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Dunno why it's gay for a people to commit to defending the blood of their forebears.
Also note that it's fairly nonsensical to talk about values/morals outside the context of a particular nation. When it comes to homosexuality, different nations will obviously come to different conclusions about how to deal with it. (E.g. in Iran they encourage folks to have sex changes, performing more sex change operations than anywhere else in the world besides Thailand.) What blood nationalism (or "racial nationalism", using a very restricted definition of "race") implies is that homosexuality would be dealt with in light of the first duty of the nation, namely protecting the genetic heritage of the people. A competing ideology would say that it's equally important (or more important) to oppose homosex. But this isn't true racial nationalism, since it doesn't oppose homosex for the sake of the upholding the blood/"race", but as an end unto itself.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan Last edited by George Witzgall; May 7th, 2015 at 12:41 AM. |
May 7th, 2015 | #53 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
Quote:
I guarantee you in the USA, fags wouldn't get approval if it wasn't for the media and the jewdicial system shoving their values down everyone's throat. These people around here where I live would just assume string them up the same way the Iranians do. Quote:
Last edited by Crowe; May 7th, 2015 at 07:20 AM. |
|||
May 8th, 2015 | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
OK, I think requiring that people be born into the nation (and an outsider can only join a nation in very limited, restricted circumstances) is a better way to define a blood-nation, rather than in terms of an explicit "duty" to protect the genetic heritage of the people, since folks who have kids with outsiders will be genetically excluded from the nation anyway (since the kids won't be part of the nation). It's also much more straightforward. So this is a better definition of a blood nation.
A blood-nation is one which (for all intents and purposes) requires people be born into it. Once the European blood-nations (and corresponding homelands) are hashed out, THEN they will be in a good position to deal with homosexuality and other moral issues. But the first necessary step is defining the nations (and homelands).
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan Last edited by George Witzgall; May 8th, 2015 at 01:24 PM. |
May 8th, 2015 | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,093
|
|
May 8th, 2015 | #56 |
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
What do you mean by this, specifically?
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
May 8th, 2015 | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
So for example blood-Germans will have to decide who is and who isn't a blood German. Clearly Turks who became German citizens after WWII aren't; and clearly anyone belonging to another blood nation, like Jews, aren't (you can't belong to two different blood nations).
For Germans, this is made easier since folks who have an Ahnenpass indicating sufficient Aryan heritage, and are currently citizens of Germany or Austria, are blood-Germans. Probably also non-citizens who are entirely descended from blood-Germans (i.e. diaspora blood-Germans) are blood-German, unless they specifically renounce it by joining another blood-nation, or by failing to join the German nation within a specific time period, I don't know what the rule should be. Also the German nation will have to create a homeland, which is a nation-state dedicated to upholding the German nation. A similar process will happen to define the French nation and homeland, and so on. My point is that the particulars of morals/values will be best dealt with in the context of a blood-nation (e.g. they can decide whether to include or exclude homosexuals).
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
May 8th, 2015 | #58 | ||||
Ole' Cyber Crusher
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The issue with this particular form of escapism is that you somehow predict that these virtually untenable blood nationalist groups will spring up all over Europe, in some kind of "one size fits all" category. I think this stems from the fact that you're American, and everything to demucracy to XXXL pants is apparently "one size fits all." There is a reason why Fascism propped up in Italy, NS in Germany, and various subsets, not "similar" really beyond revolutionary spirit and national perspectives on what was race and how important it is. You're sort of describing nationalism at its most basic level, groups of like-speaking populations forming states based upon this. The inclusion/exclusion paradigm unworkable due to the fact that you guys (all American WN and even armchair NS) are too big of pussies to contemplate dictatorship and the necessity of it. Like Marx demanding a dictatorship of the proletariat during transition we must demand a dictatorship of the blood to even get the ball rolling. Democracy that isn't hyper-rigged (like America's) or libertarianism fail and lead to Maidans and Arab Springs. They must have some kind of shadowy group moving the players in a pre-determined direction or they'll just fail on their own accord (like that historical joke and miserable failure Athens).
__________________
http://tinychat.com/finalposition2 |
||||
May 9th, 2015 | #59 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Any rate, the particulars of how the German nation is hashed out isn't something non-blood-Germans arguing on the internet can decide, but if I knew you were a blood-German I would definitely listen to what you have to say.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan Last edited by George Witzgall; May 9th, 2015 at 03:16 AM. |
||||
May 9th, 2015 | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Indigenous peoples have a right to their own homelands, especially the indigenous peoples of Europe. They have as much a right as Jews, if not more, since they've been living on the same goddamn land continuously, they aren't coming in from half-way around the world.
If indigenous peoples aren't successful in taking back their homelands, they will die out as distinctive peoples/nations. Why should Jews have a homeland for their people, but no other nation of the world? The only thing holding us back is ourselves.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|