Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 21st, 2005 #21
Mike in Denver
Enkidu
 
Mike in Denver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prozak
Is that last name similar to Fagen, as in a common Jewish name? Was this Jew on Jew rape?
Go here and read about the name Phagan:

http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.f.../qx/Phagan.htm

prozak, this web search took maybe 6 seconds from the decision to do it to reading the information. Before you post like this could you at least expend the tiny effort to do the research.

Enkidu
 
Old August 21st, 2005 #22
Angst
A Merry Kwan
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nigger U
Posts: 512
Default

"Fagin" was also the character name of the dirty Jew in Charles Dicken's Oliver Twist.
 
Old August 21st, 2005 #23
T.Garrett
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TriState
Posts: 7,208
Thumbs down oh, really ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by KATIEW
You do NOT condemn the merciless slaughter of Jewish children, but boo hoo the pali killer children.
sheenie, why should we care about the slaughter of your Izzy children, you are our enemies …we rejoice in jews tribulations and violent deaths, as you do in ours! Looky heer at what a few of your countrymen felt compelled to do while watching the World Trade Center and thousands of Americans die in a real holocaust on 9/11/01 in NYC which if it was not directly engineered by Izrael’s Mossad (as millions worldwide believe to garner US support for a demoralized and defeated Izrael), was definitely on account of Muslim anger at the American government’s obscene bias against the Palestinians in siding totally with the murderous zionists who commit war crimes daily against an unarmed civilian population …

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

eat shite and die you hideous kike!
 
Old August 21st, 2005 #24
Angst
A Merry Kwan
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nigger U
Posts: 512
Default

Jews have a very long history of murdering Gentile children. These murderous crimes against Gentile children have put more than one Jewish head in the noose. What eventually happened to Leo Frank was justice.

Money didn't save that Jew's neck--did it, Katiew?
 
Old August 21st, 2005 #25
The_skunk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 374
Default

Leo Frank was a cocaine addict who ran a factory in Atlanta after the war. He was a bisexual pedophile that forced his factory girls to have sex, or lose their jobs.

He held 13 yr old Mary's pay, told her to undress so he could masterbate, and she refused. In a cocaine induced rage he beat her, ripped her panties off, strangled her and raped her. Next he took this rope and strangled her to death.





Mary found with underwear around neck
 
Old August 22nd, 2005 #26
The_skunk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 374
Default

Leo Frank was a true monster




He did such despicable and preverted acts that women jurors were appalled

Judge cleared courtroom of women and children
 
Old August 22nd, 2005 #27
KATIEW
Senior Member
 
KATIEW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 616
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Screwface
who's mercilessly slaughtering jewish children? you're the one championing the slaughter of children, as you wished a bullet would have hit a child in the heart or head, can you read what you write? from looking at what you've written here you are seemingly a seriously hateful, dangerous and miserable person.
I would never champion the murder of innocent people anywhere on the planet. My post was to "push" AE's buttons knowing full well how he would response in his hypocritcal manner - by that I mean that he cares not if Jewish children are slaughtered, but suddenly has compassion for our cousins,Semites, the a-rabs. I predicted his response to me (re-read the posts from me to him and his to me).
 
Old August 22nd, 2005 #28
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KATIEW
AE, you are so darn predictable. I said that just for you, because I knew that you would respond just as you did above. ............what a fake and liar and hypocrite you are. You are probably some middle aged fart who has nothing to do but write crap about the jooz. Get a life, will ya?

Jewess:

Again you bait me, seeking to draw out personal information. Well, I dont care what Jews think of me so that is a waste of effort.

As for the details of who I am or what I do, you are free to think whatever you like. I would actually prefer if you think I am an unemployed, uneducated, penniless, impotent nobody. Yes, I am a nobody. Jews need not fear me. My sputterings of rage are merely blowing off of steam at the Mighty Jewkike.
 
Old August 22nd, 2005 #29
KATIEW
Senior Member
 
KATIEW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 616
Default

[IMG]C:\Documents and Settings\kraindy\My Documents\My Pictures\hhh[/IMG]
 
Old August 22nd, 2005 #30
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KATIEW
I would never champion the murder of innocent people anywhere on the planet. My post was to "push" AE's buttons knowing full well how he would response in his hypocritcal manner - by that I mean that he cares not if Jewish children are slaughtered, but suddenly has compassion for our cousins,Semites, the a-rabs. I predicted his response to me (re-read the posts from me to him and his to me).
Jewess:

You are by tribal associatin and collective guilt, guilty of many things including, guilty of the murder of millions of gentile children- guilt by association with the Commie Jewish mass murderers of the 20th century from Lenin to Lazar Kaganovich to Yezhov to Yagoda, to the American abortionist mass murderers such as Bernard Slepian or Bernard Nathanson, right on back to the famous "man woman and child" killing heroes of the Pentateuch.

I know reprise your guilt of other Jewish murders of children such as that of Hugh of Lincoln or little St Simon Of Trent.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/vi...d=953&letter=H [warning: Jewish account-- read between the lies]

Quote:
Alleged victim of ritual murder by the Jews of Lincoln in 1255. He appears to have been the illegitimate son of a woman named "Beatrice," and was born in 1247. He disappeared July 31, 1255, and his body was discovered on Aug. 29 following in a well belonging to the house of a Jew named "Jopin" or "Joscefin." On promise of having his life spared, Jopin was induced by John of Lexington, a priest who was present at the time of the discovery, to confess that the child had been crucified by a number of the most prominent Jews of England, who had gone to Lincoln on the pretext of a wedding. The remains of the lad were taken to the cathedral and were buried there in great pomp. Henry III., on arriving at Lincoln about a month afterward, revoked the pardon of Jopin, and caused him to be dragged around the city tied to the tail of a wild horse, and then hanged. The remaining Jews of Lincoln, including some who were there as visitors—probably to attend the marriage of Bellaset, daughter of Berechiah de Nicole—were carried, to the number of ninety-two, to London, where eighteen of them were executed for refusing to plead. Berechiah was released, and the remainder lingered in prison until Richard, Earl of Cornwall, who was in possession of the Jewry at the time, made terms for them. (see image) Tomb of St. Hugh in Lincoln Cathedral.(From Tovey, "Anglia Judaica," 1738.) The accusation, as usual, rested upon no particle of evidence; all that was known was that the lad had been found dead; and even if it was a murder,it could not have been connected with any ritual observance on the part of any Jew. But the prepossessions of the time, and the "confession" forced from Jopin caused the case to be prejudged, and enabled Henry III. to confiscate the property of the executed Jews, and to obtain, probably, a ransom for those afterward released from captivity. The case made a great impression on the popular mind, and forms the theme of various French, Scottish, and English ballads, still existing; Chaucer refers to it at the beginning of his "Prioress' Tale." A shrine was erected over Hugh's tomb in Lincoln Cathedral; it was known as the shrine of "Little St. Hugh" to distinguish it from the shrine of Great St. Hugh of Lincoln, the twelfth-century bishop whose death was mourned equally by Jew and Christian. See Blood Accusation.
Quote:
The small Simon, a little boy from Trent, was slayed on the 21st March, 1475, on Maundy-Thursday during Holy Week. The jews of this town wanted to celebrate the Passover in their own way; so they secretly abducted the small boy and carried him to the house of the Jew, Samuel. During the Holy week on the day before Passover, about three hours after supper, the little boy, like children do, was sitting in front of his parents’ house.

Neither his father nor mother were home at the time. It was at this time that the Jew Tobias approached the child, who was not quite 30 months old, and while speaking kindly, picked him up and carried him at once to the house of the jew Samuel. When night fell, the twin brothers Saligman and Samuel, with Tobias, Vitalis (Veitel), Moses, Israel and Mayr, undressed the little boy and unmercifully butchered him. While Moses strangled him with a handkerchief as he lay across Samuel’s knee, pieces of flesh from his neck were cut with a knife and the blood collected in a bowl. At the same time, they punctured the naked offering with needles and murmured Jewish curses.

They then cut pieces of flesh from the boy’s arm and legs and collected the blood in pots. Finally the torturers imitated the crucifixion by holding the twitching body upside down and the arms outstretched and during this horrible act they spoke the following: Take this, crucified Jesus. Just as our forefathers did once, so may all Christians by land and sea perish. They then rushed to their meal. When the child had died they threw his body in the river which flowed by their house. After this, they joyously celebrated Passover. The case was prosecuted by bishop Hinderbach, and the jews were sentenced to death. Immediately, all jews of the area protested the sentence and succeeded in gaining a new trial for the accused. It was tried before Giudici of Ventimiglia, and he confirmed the sentence.

Again because of jewish protests, the case came before the court of Pope Sixtus IV. He commissioned the greatest and most famous professor of law at that time, Panvino, to serve as Chief Justice. Assisted by six cardinals, he too confirmed the sentence. The court stated: The Hebrews killed the little boy Simon, in order to obey a rabbinical religious law; their motive being to serve a most wicked piety and devotion by obtaining Christian blood for the celebration of Passover.

The records of this trial were originally kept in the secret archive of the Citadel of St. Angelo and were then transferred to the Vatican, where they are now available for examination. They were disclosed by Pope Benedict XIV; Pope Clement XIV as legal counsellor for the Holy Office, before he became Pope, verified the murders of both St. Simon of Trent and St. Andreas of Rinn (remember St. Dominguito del Val, Mártir) as cases of ritual murder almost 300 years later, in 1770.

The boy who was tortured to death at Trent was canonized by Sixtus V. Saint Simon of Trent was venerated as martyr from 1475 until 1965, when he was de-canonized by order of the Racist Zionist Mafia in collaboration with their Marranos friends in the VATICAN. This was done in harmony with the modern Church's policy of abandoning its current TRADITION in favor of modern Judaism. These are some ritual murders which are known, hundreds of thousands of children disappear every year in the world, perhaps some of them victims of zionist ritual murder which remain undiscovered.

Today, I think Jews have mostly abandoned small-scale direct ritual sacrifice of Gentile children, in favor of large-scale sacrifice of Gentiles a la legalized abortion or the Iraq war.

For people even among WN who are incredulous about the veracity of claims of Jewish ritual sacrifice I recommend the book by de Vier "Blood Ritual"

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books

Quote:
Blood Ritual_ by Philip de Vier is a highly controversial book on the charged issue of Jewish ritual murders. It is published by the National Vanguard Books who dispense a wide variety of titles like this and other controversial literature. The cover illustration is a woodcut of shady looking men cutting a young woman's throat on March 29, 1899 in what was then the Austro-Hungarian Empire. An illustration inside shows bearded Middle Eastern-looking men drinking blood out of a child through straws. For many centuries, Christians (and some Muslims) have accused Jews of performing ritual murders on Christian children and symbolically re-crucifying Christ by desecrating communion wafers (defined as the literal body and blood of Christ according to Roman Catholic dogma). These incidents usually happened around the time of Easter or the Jewish feast of Purim, a celebration commemorating Jewish vengeance on adversaries from the Old Testament book of Esther in the month of March. I remember reading how the Nuremburg executions were carried out during this time of the year in 1946, and President Bush delivered his ultimatum to Saddam Hussein on Purim in 2003. De Vier presents his material in several sections and he covers a host of topics related to so-called "blood libels:" snuff films, child pornography, Jack the Ripper, Son of Sam, "vampires," sympathetic magic, Voodoo sacrificial cults and other strange phenomena. First, he establishes what exactly he is discussing and researching in an introduction and from there shows how he will examine the evidence from the material he gathered from studying these bizarre and far-flung cases. De Vier comes to the following conclusion: there has been a series of ritual murders in various countries, committed by various individuals over a period of many centuries dating from medieval times to possibly the present. Generally a murdered body was found with strange cut marks on it near the times of Easter/Passover and Purim which sometimes let to outbreaks of violence against Jews. The official line of this story is that none of these victims (some of whom were revered as Saints until recently in the Roman Catholic Church) were victims of Jewish violence and that attacks on Jews were motivated by irrational Christian anti-Semitism and racial hatred. To de Vier's credit, he acknowledges the speculative, open-for-debate nature of this conclusion because it is somewhat (or very, depending on the reader's biases) controversial and inflammatory. Much of the book consists of de Vier's timeline of ritual murder cases. He draws up a "profile" of those likely to commit ritual crime: they tend to have strong motives of vengeance, power drive and psychosexual perversion. De Vier then details ritual murder cases dating from the sacrifice of Jepthah's daughter (Judges 11) and the human sacrifice cult of Moloch dating from the 900s B.C. to a Brazilian and Italian child pornography ring bust that had international connections in September 2000. The timeline has an encyclopedia of ritual murder cases including the famous cases of Simon of Trent, a young boy found murdered in Italy in 1475 and later revered as a saint by the Church in Italy and William of Norwich, an English boy found with marks suggesting he had been nailed to a cross in 1144. Other famous cases are covered including the 1899 murder of a young woman in Hungary, Agnes Hurza and the 1840 murder of Fr. Thomas, a Catholic priest in Damascus, Syria. The Fr. Thomas case received very wide press attention worldwide and provoked an investigation by Ottoman authorities. However, the issue was quickly silenced by powerful Jewish diplomatic interests in Europe. There is also a series of very interesting cases surrounding Jack the Ripper's murders in London during the 1890s. The victims of the Ripper were butchered with strange cuts and ritual marks. Scrawled along the walls near one of the murders was a cryptic message that was quickly erased by the police: "The Jewes are not the men to be blamed for nothing." The "Son of Sam" killings in New York during the 1970s had ritualistic overtones. David Berkowitz said he was inspired by a demon to kill and the murders may have been committed by more than one gunman based on some evidence. De Vier's book also covers the substantial literature produced about ritual murders including the British Nazi Arnold Leese's pamphlet _Jewish Ritual Murder_ and articles published by one of Hitler's propagandists, Julius Streicher, in the newspaper _Der Sturmer_. A central point to de Vier's analysis is the fact that ritual murder has existed in many other cultures (or if not cultures, then outright cults and secret societies) and therefore could be practiced by Jews against Christians and other opponents. He cites the medieval Islamic Hashishim (Assassins), India's Thuggee cult (Thugs), Aztecs, ancient Carthage (a Semitic people descended from Hebrew cousins, the Phoenicians) and African tribes where cannibalism and human sacrifice have been practiced, along with vampirism and related phenomena in the US today. De Vier also relates another curious example of villagers in Germany sacrificing a child so a bridge would be safe from collapse during the 1800s as a totally irrational relapse back into "Teutonic atavism." De Vier takes the contemporary, post Vatican II Roman Catholic hierarchy to task for succumbing to Jewish pressure by disbanding the official cult status/Sainthood of victims of ritual murder, notably Simon of Trent. He calls Vatican II "heretical" because it disavowed thousands of years of traditional imprecations against the Jews in a misguided attempt to "modernize" itself and become "politically correct." Of course, if the reader does not accept as a priori the Jewish control of the media (or if not "Jewish" control then control by interests sympathetic to organized Judaism and opposed to Christianity) this book will prove extremely offensive. De Vier is careful to note that some accusations were probably false and the results of paranoia and hysteria. However, any reader interested in the dark, conspiratorial, occult and grotesque side of human nature will find much of interest nonetheless.
Jewess: your complete and total and permanent repudiation of Jewry, and total and convincing withdrawal from the belonging in and all participation and benefits and emoluments of the hate-tribe of Jewry, would be the only thing that would cause me to release you from the collective guilt that you bear like it or not. Jews are by nature, resposible for crimes against Humanity and Jews as a group will either be corrected or humanity will continue to suffer under the Jewish yoke.
 
Old August 23rd, 2005 #31
The_skunk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 374
Default

At first I felt that this was done by Anti-Semites






I was very moved


I had read some of the Jewish books, and really believed Leo was innocent. After exploring numerous internet sites and historical records it became obvious Leo was a monster.

His cocaine habit went too far, and he lost control. He probably would have never been arrested for the rape charge, so why did he have to kill some poor 13 yr old girl.
 
Old August 23rd, 2005 #32
Mike
reasonradionetwork.com
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 1,475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_skunk
At first I felt that this was done by Anti-Semites
We all know the ADL lies. We also know that the ADL defends its own, right or wrong, and spits on White life like that of Mary Phagen. The ADL paints a picture of Leo being lynched because, and only because, he happened to be a jew. At the very least, logic dictates that Leo was killed because he was believed to be the killer, not simply because he was Jewish. The ADL story is that a negro janitor was the real perp. That would indicate that both a DA and a jury in the old White South consciously or unconsciously overlooked a guilty nigger who raped and murder a 13 yo White girl, just to be spiteful toward some Jew. It defies all credulity, yet that's what the ADL says we should believe.
__________________

Unplug the Jewtube NOW. / My ideology: [1][2] / "Race is real. The Holocaust is a social construct." - Alex Linder.
 
Old August 23rd, 2005 #33
Screwface
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KATIEW
I would never champion the murder of innocent people anywhere on the planet
this sounds like championeering a childs death:
Quote:
Originally Posted by KATIEW earlier post
As far as the IDF shooting a kid in the nuts , I say, too bad it wasn't higher up...like the heart or head? aye?
 
Old August 23rd, 2005 #34
The_skunk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike
At the very least, logic dictates that Leo was killed because he was believed to be the killer, not simply because he was Jewish. The ADL story is that a negro janitor was the real perp. That would indicate that both a DA and a jury in the old White South consciously or unconsciously overlooked a guilty nigger who raped and murder a 13 yo White girl, just to be spiteful toward some Jew. It defies all credulity, yet that's what the ADL says we should believe.
In 1915 they would have hung the 'Darkie' Conley in a nano second.

Mary's great niece wrote a book, and it followed along the lines of what you stated. She said the evidence was overwhelming against Leo Frank.
 
Old August 25th, 2005 #35
KATIEW
Senior Member
 
KATIEW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 616
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.Garrett
sheenie, why should we care about the slaughter of your Izzy children, you are our enemies …we rejoice in jews tribulations and violent deaths, as you do in ours! Looky heer at what a few of your countrymen felt compelled to do while watching the World Trade Center and thousands of Americans die in a real holocaust on 9/11/01 in NYC which if it was not directly engineered by Izrael’s Mossad (as millions worldwide believe to garner US support for a demoralized and defeated Izrael), was definitely on account of Muslim anger at the American government’s obscene bias against the Palestinians in siding totally with the murderous zionists who commit war crimes daily against an unarmed civilian population …

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

eat shite and die you hideous kike!
I think you've got it wrong as usual garrett.


THE PALESTINIANS AFTER 9/11

http://www.kjbbn.net/9-11%20and%20th...%20to%20it.htm

AND THE JEWS OF ISRAEL:

http://j-town.com/911/memorial_book/
 
Old August 25th, 2005 #36
KATIEW
Senior Member
 
KATIEW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 616
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_skunk
At first I felt that this was done by Anti-Semites






I was very moved


I had read some of the Jewish books, and really believed Leo was innocent. After exploring numerous internet sites and historical records it became obvious Leo was a monster.

His cocaine habit went too far, and he lost control. He probably would have never been arrested for the rape charge, so why did he have to kill some poor 13 yr old girl.

If Leo was a monster (I confess, I did not look into it), then take a gander at this:
WHITES like Dahmer, Kemper, Bundy, Gacy, ED GEIN, Otis Toole, Charles Manson, Richard Speck, Andrei Chikatilo - some of whom like Ed Gein, Chikatilo, Dahmer and Kemper raped the corpses of the people they murdered and cannibalized them[B]

http://carpenoctem.tv/killers/
 
Old August 25th, 2005 #37
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

beware katiew. she has apparently attached a picture of a bareshouldered girl to her user profile. the jewesses like to lure White men into error by sexual suggestions. beware the kikette.
 
Old August 25th, 2005 #38
KATIEW
Senior Member
 
KATIEW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 616
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
beware katiew. she has apparently attached a picture of a bareshouldered girl to her user profile. the jewesses like to lure White men into error by sexual suggestions. beware the kikette.
eh, nah ae. Me thinks garrett fucked with my avatar again. He gets his jollies that way. Instead of changing it, i think it's kinda cute. Nice shoulders itz
 
Old August 25th, 2005 #39
Screwface
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KATIEW
If Leo was a monster (I confess, I did not look into it), then take a gander at this:
WHITES like Dahmer, Kemper, Bundy, Gacy, ED GEIN, Otis Toole, Charles Manson, Richard Speck, Andrei Chikatilo - some of whom like Ed Gein, Chikatilo, Dahmer and Kemper raped the corpses of the people they murdered and cannibalized them[B]

http://carpenoctem.tv/killers/
yeah but the ADL didn't see to it that these people were exonerated of there crimes as they did with Leo Frank.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADL.ORG
It was through ADL's campaign to exonerate Frank that The Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles officially pardoned him on March 11, 1986, 73 years after his conviction.
http://www.adl.org/ADL_Opinions/Anti.../leo_frank.htm
 
Old August 30th, 2005 #40
H.T.
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 192
Thumbs up In Defense of Leo Frank (quite easy actually)

Even a casual glance at Google hits on the story of Leo Frank, at the very least, should reveal that Frank was likely NOT a murderer/rapist/pedophile, but instead a regular family man with a hand in philanthropic causes.

Question why one VNN’r chose to omit the following very relevant and very salient points: (Pre-Conclusion: He lies like a rug!)

1. Leo Frank was president of the Atlanta, Georgia B’nai Brith Organization that represented the largest Jewish community in the U.S. at that time. (You’ve gotta prove yourself before your granted that position!)

2. Conley was arrested 7x in 8 years for disorderly conduct and drunkenness. “Until he was spotlighted on the witness stand and uttered the words that condemned his employer, not a human in Atlanta would have believe him under oath.”

3. Leo Frank was a 1906 Engineering graduate of Cornell and established a pencil factory after “coming to terms with Atlanta citizens” in the thriving City of Dixie.

4. Conley? A broomsweeper.

5. “Beside the body were two notes. One of them was penciled on a faded yellow order blank; and with asterisks to indicate certain unprintable words, it read:”

Mam, that negro fire down here did this***** he push me down that hole***** a long tall negro black that who it wase long sleam tall negro I write while********

Kinda atypical dialect for a Jew, no?

6. Mrs. Formby was well acquainted with the detectives of Atlanta. She ran a brothel, and she later swore--from the safety of distant New York City--that the sleuths got her drunk and made her accuse Leo. The Constitution carried a story that on the evening of the murder Leo had telephoned her, frantically demanding a room in her house for himself and a young girl. "It's a matter of life and death," she said Leo told her. And though Leo proved by many witnesses that he was at that time entertaining friends in his home, the story got out that Frank was a pervert--and the town went mad.

7. The state also contended that certain scarlet stains on the floor of a room next to Leo's office were blood. But the prosecution refused to have these stains analyzed.

8. On October 3 W.M. Smith, Conley's lawyer, said he believed that Conley had killed the little girl. Eleven days later the Supreme Court of Georgia, all members sitting and concurring, affirmed Judge Hill's decision denying the extraordinary motion [for a new trial.]

9. Just before Judge Roan died in New York City on March 23, 1915, he stated:

"I gave that case more consideration than any other I ever sat on. Though I heard evidence and arguments for thirty days, I don't know this morning whether Leo Frank is innocent or guilty. But I was not the one to be convinced. The jury was convinced and I must approve the verdict. Therefore, I overruled the motion for a new trial."

10. “Not long ago the Negro Conley was shot while staging a burglary. When he recovered he was sentenced to twenty years in prison.”

11. “Eventually, when it was too late, the truth came out. Conley's lawyer had told Judge Roan that Conley had confessed to the murder several times, but despite this, Roan had kept silent and sentenced Frank to death. Another man, named Alonzo Mann, who has a fourteen year old boy had worked in the factory, told investigators that he had seen Conley commit the crime, but had kept silent because of Conley's threat to kill him if he spoke out. On March 11th, 1986, Leo Frank was issued a pardon by the state of Georgia”

Pardon:

March 4, 1982 - Alonzo Mann, in failing health, signed an affidavit asserting Leo Frank's innocence and Jim Conley's guilt. He admitted he had seen Conley carrying the limp body of Mary Phagan on his shoulder near the trapdoor leading to the basement on April 26, 1913. Conley had threatened to kill him if he ever told anyone what he had seen. He did go home and tell his mother, who advised him to keep quiet. After Frank's conviction, his parents still kept him quiet, saying it would do no good to come forth after the verdict. He was telling the story now to unburden his soul. He had actually tried to tell the story several times before, but no one had paid any attention. He had even gotten into a fight with a fellow soldier in World War I when he tried to asset Frank's innocence.He took several lie detector tests while telling his story to a group of reporters for The Tennessean, a newspaper in Nashville, TN. The tests indicated Mann was telling the truth.

March 7, 1982 - The Tennessean ran the story of Alonzo Mann's confession.

November 10, 1982 - Alonzo Mann repeated his story in a videotape statement in Atlanta.

January 4, 1983 - Based largely on Alonzo Mann's testimony, the Anti-Defamation League submitted an application for a posthumous pardon for Leo Frank to the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles.

December 22, 1983 - the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles denied the motion for a pardon, the reason being that while Alonzo Mann's testimony might incriminate Jim Conley, it did not conclusively prove the innocence of Leo Frank.

March 11, 1986 - the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles finally issued a posthumous pardon to Leo Frank, based on the state's failure to protect him while in custody; it did not officially absolve him of the crime.



References.

NEUTRAL:
http://www.crimelibrary.com/classics/frank/
http://www.cviog.uga.edu/Projects/gainfo/leofrank.htm
http://gaslight.mtroyal.ca/penclfct.htm
http://www.atlantanation.com/leofrank.html
http://ngeorgia.com/feature/littlesecrets.html
http://www.sos.state.ga.us/archives/...nk/default.htm
http://www.ourgeorgiahistory.com/chronpop/584
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metr...8leofrank.html


NOT NEUTRAL:
http://judicial-inc.biz/MiscPics.htm
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.
Page generated in 0.20941 seconds.