DNA or antrophology?

[Fico]

A long time I think about opening of this topic and today debate with former member of this forum who is know guest who claims that he have 11% non-white genes and perivous claims of Craig Cobb who as I known didn't challenged result of his DNA who was shown that he have that he have 14% non-white genes,Cobb said that is this just statistically in this show. This is DNA look.
In Stormfront I saw that some members trying to claim this and they write that Cobb is antrophological correct. This is antrophological look and now I will put some question to members here for who I am interested to know answer or opinion with other about this:

1. Can antrophology camouflage someone who have non-white genes and classified as white? If is answer "yes" on how many percent are recongized as white? If is answer "no",are antrophology reliable for determination of race?

2. Is someone of here go to this DNA test? If is,can someone tell us its result?
What is the name of this DNA test exactly,an where people can do this? On what way people can explain what they want to know of this test and whom? How many costs such test?

I especially want to see on this topic people who really know much of antrophology and DNA and also answers on question,people always of WN mentioning race question and I think that is this topic important for such question and also think that it will be big interest for this topic,well we will see.

[RickHolland]

The magic formula is:

DNA + Anthropology + Genealogy = Race

Anthropological analysis always have some degree of subjectivity and skill involved specially in the not so obvious cases like the mixed race ancestry individuals.

It isn't very scientific in the determination of non-white genes and "White" classification when used in isolation but it is still better than the, most common methods like skin color, eye color or hair color.

Wikipedia (Links)

Casta

Wikipedia (Links)

Mestizo

Wikipedia (Links)

Colorism

Wikipedia (Links)

Miscegenation

Wikipedia (Links)

Colonial_mentality

Wikipedia (Links)

Cultural_assimilation

Wikipedia (Links)

Cultural_assimilation_of_Native_Americans

A painting of a Spanish man and an Indian woman with Mestizo child, 1770.


Mestizo-Mestiza, Peru, circa 1770.


De español y mulata, morisca. Miguel Cabrera, 1763


Depiction of casta system

Read the following links about DNA testing:

http://genealogy.about.com/od/dna_ge.../dna-tests.htm

Wikipedia (Links)

Genealogical_DNA_test

http://www.legalgenealogist.com/blog...na-test-bucks/

http://www.dna-testing-adviser.com/Autosomal-DNA.html

http://www.isogg.org/wiki/Autosomal_...mparison_chart

http://www.dnainheritance.kahikatea.net/autosomal.html

[Fico]

Originally Posted by RickHolland

The magic formula is:

DNA + Anthropology + Genealogy = Race

Anthropological analysis always have some degree of subjectivity and skill involved specially in the not so obvious cases like the mixed race ancestry individuals.

It isn't very scientific in the determination of non-white genes and "White" classification when used in isolation but it is still better than the, most common methods like skin color, eye color or hair color.

Let's take easy hypothetical exemple,one man is anthropological correct as white (probably genealogical correct) but DNA not because of 10 % non-white genes. Whether is he white or not?

Is it posible that one person have 100% white genes according to DNA test?

In evolutionary look,is it normal that for example Cobb have some non-white genes because of some far common ancestor whose genes have had potential for developed today look of Cobb?

Can eugenics purify non-white genes on white genes (what means that person have 100% white genes)?