Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 22nd, 2019 #1
Hamish
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 53
Default Rules for Me (Hillary) and Rules for Thee

Rules for Me (Hillary) and Rules for Thee

If it had been one of us fly over commoners, we'd be sitting in a federal prison.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...prosecuted-was

Quote:
"The FBI's top lawyer, General Counsel James Baker, initially thought that Hillary Clinton should face criminal charges for transmitting classified information over her insecure, private email server, according to transcripts from a 2018 closed-door Congressional testimony reviewed by The Hill's John Solomon."

...

"Baker later explained how he arrived at his conclusion, and how he was "persuaded" to change his mind.

"So, I had that belief initially after reviewing, you know, a large binder of her emails that had classified information in them," said Baker. "And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that - we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that - she had the intent necessary to violate (the law)."

Last edited by Hamish; February 22nd, 2019 at 09:46 AM.
 
Old February 22nd, 2019 #2
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,632
Default

Yes, except that the law involved specifically does NOT require intent: only the act itself, regardless of intent, needs to be proven.
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.
Page generated in 0.12000 seconds.