Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old September 1st, 2017 #21
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
OK, I'll give it a listen & see how it goes. But which one is it?
Either works, but I was talking about Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. Much overlap.
 
Old September 1st, 2017 #22
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

I just finished the intro to Revolutionary Spirit. 1200 pages to go.....lol. Man, Christers in general & cafflicks in particular take one hell of a lot for granted.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old December 20th, 2018 #23
P.E.
Geriatric Coalburner
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,825
P.E.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Jones really doesn't argue. He explains the catholic position and differentiates it from the Nazi position. Jones is actually fairly leftist. Nazism = biological essentialism. If catholics can convert one in a million jews, that proves they could convert the rest, and their position is right, and blood-biology is wrong. I find Jones's approach odd. He does not anticipate and answer obvious counter arguments or objections, he simply asserts. I don't know if that is his way or the catholic way generally. He's essentially betting that people will accept his conclusion following from his data (history), and as I say, I don't think they will. No matter his intent, he and his evidence prove the racial case: jews can't change. And one in a thousand conversions proves nothing except outliers exist. Which no racialist denies. Essentially, Jones can only argue by misconstruing racialism, creating a strawman. Race is rough but real, it's not the only thing going, it's just a lot more important than catholicism or goy-leftism acknowledges. I say again: Jones's evidence does not lead to Jones's conclusions. And I believe most readers will see it that way.
Check him out on the latest "The Gas Station" on the heelturn channel from a day or two ago, where they were essentially hammering Jones over and over about Jews and biology as a tribe and race, and Jones kept flopping around "Jews see themselves as a race, they're the seed of" blah blah, but then he kept repeating his "there is no white race, it's like a blue thought" bullshit. He denies the collective European will (which even Hitler and the NS saw, Hitler's numerous speeches had the word "Europa" in it as defense against Asiatic Bolshevism and plutocratic Jewry).

Jones is one of the few writers I can recommend others to read but have to give the stipulation that some of it is bullshit. He's absolutely right when he analyzes the bases of morality that were conducive to healthy societies, he's right when he points out the Jews that were critical in the destruction of the society we had, he's right when he points out the Jew and his usury schemes historically as an enemy of the value of labor.

But he's still just a soldier for a Jewish religion in the end, which is why he sees the Jews as people, rather than the pests and viruses they historically have been. Jones' argument is "if I can decorate my cancerous tumor with the cross..."
 
Old December 25th, 2018 #24
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P.E. View Post
Check him out on the latest "The Gas Station" on the heelturn channel from a day or two ago, where they were essentially hammering Jones over and over about Jews and biology as a tribe and race, and Jones kept flopping around "Jews see themselves as a race, they're the seed of" blah blah, but then he kept repeating his "there is no white race, it's like a blue thought" bullshit. He denies the collective European will (which even Hitler and the NS saw, Hitler's numerous speeches had the word "Europa" in it as defense against Asiatic Bolshevism and plutocratic Jewry).

Jones is one of the few writers I can recommend others to read but have to give the stipulation that some of it is bullshit. He's absolutely right when he analyzes the bases of morality that were conducive to healthy societies, he's right when he points out the Jews that were critical in the destruction of the society we had, he's right when he points out the Jew and his usury schemes historically as an enemy of the value of labor.

But he's still just a soldier for a Jewish religion in the end, which is why he sees the Jews as people, rather than the pests and viruses they historically have been. Jones' argument is "if I can decorate my cancerous tumor with the cross..."
yes. but my argument that the evidence he puts out will draw people to OUR conclusions not his. because his don't follow logically or reasonably from the evidence, they contravene it. and like i said, i started to have a sneaking suspicion toward the end of the book that he actually understands this. i dont quite believe. but it's possible.
 
Old January 8th, 2019 #25
P.E.
Geriatric Coalburner
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,825
P.E.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
yes. but my argument that the evidence he puts out will draw people to OUR conclusions not his. because his don't follow logically or reasonably from the evidence, they contravene it. and like i said, i started to have a sneaking suspicion toward the end of the book that he actually understands this. i dont quite believe. but it's possible.
He laughed when The Gas Station asked him if he wants to live in secular white society or a catholic nigger shithole.

He knows.
 
Reply

Tags
abir taha, audiobooks, friedrich nietzsche

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.
Page generated in 0.08663 seconds.