|
|
View Poll Results: confine antis to opposition forum yea or nay? | |||
Yea | 16 | 44.44% | |
Nay | 8 | 22.22% | |
Yes and define anti broadly to include all disruptors | 9 | 25.00% | |
Yes but define anti narrowly | 3 | 8.33% | |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
February 14th, 2005 | #41 |
Ausrotter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Walhalla
Posts: 4,018
|
Anima is in another category as the anti's, although he deserved to be in the hoosgow to cool off from his flaming. Main difference is, Anima names the jew.
The jews and their servants should be kicked out of the main forums.
__________________
"People, look at the evidence the truth is there you just have to look for it!!!!!" - Joe Vialls Fight jewish censorship, use Aryan Wiki Watch online television without jews! |
February 14th, 2005 | #42 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Has 'John Joy Tree' been paying out some shekels in here ?
The removal of the UK MODDY has ensured that the lunatics have arrived. We have got the porn spammer/Scotland88 back and a few marxist pro-IRA types posting now. Looks rather like anarchy will break out in there. It appears a senior VNN moderator in the USA isn't what he ought to be |
February 14th, 2005 | #43 |
Ausrotter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Walhalla
Posts: 4,018
|
One non-american mod is needed, if only because of timezone differences.
__________________
"People, look at the evidence the truth is there you just have to look for it!!!!!" - Joe Vialls Fight jewish censorship, use Aryan Wiki Watch online television without jews! |
February 14th, 2005 | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
|
Quote:
So, who removed BrightonWNP from Moderator status ? He AND Vnn'ers deserve an explanation.
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire |
|
February 14th, 2005 | #45 | |
The paranormal silent type
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
February 15th, 2005 | #46 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
whether it was intentional or a bug or a hack we will find out. looking into this.
|
February 15th, 2005 | #47 | |
The paranormal silent type
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 8,265
|
Then that's true what they say, "There's some good in everyone"
Quote:
__________________
|
|
April 13th, 2005 | #48 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
???
Quote:
There are many, many White women who are molested and raped because they think being around niggers is okay. Because people like you give them that idea. Quote:
|
||
April 14th, 2005 | #49 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have you considered implementing a warning system? If there were a system in place, moderating all new posts could be cut down and only reported flaming, trolls, etc. could be reviewed by moderators/admins. This would help out your work load, as well as cutting down on those who are a problem to the forum. With a warning system in place, Anti's would be free to post, but if they accumulate a specified number of warnings, then they could be confined to Opposition or ultimately banned from the forum.
|
April 17th, 2005 | #50 |
A Merry Kwan
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nigger U
Posts: 512
|
My opinion is that antis should remain confined to the opposition forum.
We lose order by allowing them to post outside of the opposition forum. We do not gain anything by allowing them to post outside of the opposition forum. Does meaningful debate suffer? We do not lose the opportunity to debate because antis can still read the content of other threads and debate those points in the opposition forum. Just my opinion. --AG |
April 17th, 2005 | #51 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think that we should go as far as removing those who speak nigger in their posts. Ebonics, or hip-hop language, or whatever the hell you call it has no place among us here. It usually indicates a lack of education and sympathy to the poisonous nigger culture we are already up to our ears in.
What niggers, etc... are doing here in the first place I can't understand, and they should be removed in order to promote productive discourse on relevant issues. In addition: we should remove anyone not adding benefit to this forum and exist here primarily to stir shit or post derogatory divisive items... Just my opinion. |
June 17th, 2005 | #52 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There should not even be an Opp forum. I have never understood the point of it. We see enough of it everywhere else. These boards could be cleaned up in less than a week, and kept clean very easily. Ban "womyn", ban their sycophants, ban disruptors, excise the Opp forum, and in general just clean house. The wheat must be separated from the chaff. The chaff is pretty obvious. Discrepancies will arise, but they will have to be swallowed.
I nominate myself for moderator. I have plenty of time on my hands at the moment, and can guarantee hygiene on the boards. You will not see a trace of the bickering, smilies or stickies, or whatever other little means of annoyance the lessers employ. Idle threads capped immediately, idle posters banned forthwith. This would all, ideally, produce a more valuable bunch of core members who would also become more familiar with each other and more polished in composure. I realize most of the present moderators are busy people. I am not. I would purge VNNF of the dross in less than a week. We all know who is really valuable here—the moderators, guys like Draco, Doppel, DC, Rounder, KLM, Prozak, and so on. Anyone harping on sexual themes would have to go straightaway; this is not a pornography forum. Here, as in any kind of grouping, one is faced with the fundamental opposition of chaos and order. This can be called by a dozen other binomes, but the principle is the same: chaos and order. The root of the word order is our very own ar- [as in 'orthodox'], so there can be no quibbling about this: we must bring more order to the forum. |
June 18th, 2005 | #53 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
June 18th, 2005 | #54 | |
Angry Shiksa
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the unholy land
Posts: 10,011
|
Quote:
|
|
June 18th, 2005 | #55 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
|
|
June 18th, 2005 | #56 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
As for Draco, maybe that is personal bias. I am no longer a "pan-aryanist", but I like him for two reasons: his posts have balls and I appreciate a healthy ultranational standpoint. Maybe it's just one guido sticking up for another, though. There is inevitably an element of favoritism in power; the problem is not favoritism (or power) per se, but the person who is in power and the types he will be inclined to favor. I understand that Draco has been pretty controversial to some, though, and that would be enough in my book to can him. |
|
June 18th, 2005 | #57 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
|
|
June 18th, 2005 | #58 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
love, Dude |
|
June 18th, 2005 | #59 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
-Mr. Dudis |
|
June 18th, 2005 | #60 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Oh, of course, that Dude. I enjoy what certain authors have written about the Dude - namely Matthew and John, Nietzsche, Shaw (Androcles and The Lion), and DH Lawrence (The Man Who Died) - and have written of him myself, though Linder, understandably enough, withheld that essay from publication, wherein I somewhat rhapsodically concluded that the Dude's value lay in the model of a Jew overcoming Judaism. (Although Kevin MacDonald should have noticed that the phenomenon of the Disciples was typically Jewish—which often enough grieved the unintentional Master.) I was not raised sub ille signo, and read Hitler and the Zend Avesta before ever reading a word of the Gospel, so my thoughts on the matter were formed mostly late. I have always had an instinctual aversion to the notion of divinity, though at present I am more than capable of enjoying the abstract sense of reverence behind our little word God as good poetry or at the very least as a foil to sheer "godlessness". I find "intellectual" Dudism, which may be what you mean by positive Dudism, positively revolting when found among White Nationalists, as most incongruous and fatally inappropriate to the basic requirements in the prosecution of our cause. I dislike agnosticism, i.e. intellectual pussyfooting, in theology no less than agnosticism in archaeology or philology. When I see Dudism, or the Dudist Church, treated frivolously, for example in a certain modern book which has delighted cunts all over the West, or in little dismissive clichés, I cringe as an antiquarian sometimes does when the past is maligned by idiots. Yet I have no real affection for the Dudist Church, in Rome, Antioch of Moscow, and would love to see St. Peter's occupied by a nigger. I was briefly attracted by the Russian author Leontiev's romantic-authoritarian vision of the Church as a protective hygienic force in Eastern society, capable of supporting diverse cultures in good morals without threatening them with its own monoculture; but so what. I once seriously considered joining a Cistercian monastery or converting to Orthodoxy and retiring to Mt Athos. Of late I have set myself the task of finally reading all of the Dude's Book, simply as the blueprint of all Jewry and to supplement scholarly interests, and like anyone else I am also touched by the beauty of some passages, a few of which are never far from my thoughts; I can recite a few passages in the Greek. I acknowledge certain historical positives and negatives of Dudism, but in general my heart and head have always been inclined to worship at the noble altar of the Reich.
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|