|
April 2nd, 2009 | #41 | ||||||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
And what you say isn't quite right. Just because blacks are disproportionately responsible for violent crimes, doesn't mean that you should treat a black man following you any differently from a white man. Perhaps neither group commits many violent crimes at all. Perhaps both groups are risky enough to be careful of. In this case, I think the latter option applies. Indeed, I'm not against all racial judgements, just some (perhaps most) of them. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And to be honest, it's a bit laughable that you'd compare the goings on on this website to marketing schemes. Quote:
Quote:
Edit: Also, it seems you know a lot more about Jewish culture than I do. Heh. |
||||||
April 2nd, 2009 | #42 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
Just because sharks are disproportionately responsible for ocean crimes, doesn't mean that you should treat a shark following you any differently from any other fish. It's all so simple when you abandon the egalitarian bullshit. |
|
April 2nd, 2009 | #43 | |
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
|
|
April 2nd, 2009 | #44 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
Out of curiosity what constitutes class membership anyways? If I am a world reknown chemist am I in the same category as an empty-headed nigger ? If so then you're wrong , class membership doesn't render any valid judgment. If it doesn't then "class membership" becomes a vague term and since it's vague judging by it will give similarly vague results. Most blacks in the particular class that I am well familiar with are in fact an example of my point, the local black scientists at an agricultural institute here would likely tell you less about their field than a farmer or a pre-bachelor student. Yet if we use class basis you'd say they are equal to say Dr.Watson and that gives laughable results. Also I don't understand why you extrapolate racism as being judgment of individuals rather than groups, that has never been the point so I don't really see your objective as disproving it wont give any credence to your point (Not that you can now that you've made such an absurd statement). Quote:
|
||
April 2nd, 2009 | #45 | ||||||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
"Perhaps neither group commits many violent crimes at all. Perhaps both groups are risky enough to be careful of. In this case, I think the latter option applies." Quote:
I'm saying that class membership is defined by attributes which are more relevant than morphology. Race membership isn't. Therefore, class membership is probably a better thing to judge by than is race membership. I never said race membership should never be used to make judgements. Quote:
Quote:
One group being more dangerous than another doesn't mean that either group should be described as "dangerous", or that only one should be described as dangerous. Perhaps one should, perhaps both, perhaps neither. The mere presence of a difference in dangerousness doesn't allow you to reach any of those conclusions. |
||||||
April 2nd, 2009 | #46 | ||||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Yes it does, it's all your point rests on. If it's vague then your point collapses.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
April 2nd, 2009 | #47 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Can't you understand?
I'm talking about what can and can't be used to reach a conclusion. The mere presence of a difference in dangerousness can't be used to reach the conclusions I mentioned. I did not say which conclusion was correct. Please try to understand this very simple point. |
April 2nd, 2009 | #48 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
Quote:
Chimps are dangerous animals and thus humans must take care when handling them. Not all chimps will rip off your face, but enough will that you need to stay cautious. Same reasoning applies to blacks. I am sure there are sharks that will let you ride on their back but I wont go swimming with them, that's irrational. Quote:
|
|||
April 2nd, 2009 | #49 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
Quote:
The original quote I replied to: Quote:
That is invalid. So, I didn't say which conclusion was correct, did I? |
|||
April 2nd, 2009 | #50 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
No it's not, you're using terms you don't even understand. That is not invalid and in fact is valid regardless of if the conditions are true or not. Please stop using logical terms. If you mean it isn't valid from your point of view then I don't care but to say it isn't valid by virtue of logic is false since it's rational. Unless of course you want to argue that desiring to live is unreasonable.
|
April 3rd, 2009 | #51 |
coast to coast WN
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Louisville KY area
Posts: 5,775
|
Hey Larry, do you live in a Nigger ghetto?
If you do not then why don't you?
__________________
nothing says lovin' like a jew in the oven Kentckyanna True News "What do you expect? All we got on this team are a bunch a Jews, spics, niggers, pansies -- and a booger-eatin' moron!" Tanner Boyle - short stop for the Bad News Bears. |
April 3rd, 2009 | #52 | |||||
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Anyhow, for many social purposes, I have to stick together with whites. SImple as that. Like it or not; but generally it is my pleasure to do so, it is at times my duty and my honor and my loyalty demanded of me by my blood, and I wont let jewish bullshit convince me otherwise. Quote:
i'd have rather studied some things I liked, rather than jews, but, jews were powerful and force us to pay attention to them whether we like them or not. |
|||||
April 4th, 2009 | #53 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 250
|
Larry Heinberg is a jew. It is endemic in the jew to advance the cause of the negro, because they are a so called minority. Jews believe that if they support all minorities they support themselves.
He will argue that we shouldn't single out this minority and that minority, with the end result being that the jew is protected. Of course, wrapped up in this is the continual attack on the White race, who the jew sees as his enemy. The jews are intent on not seeing another 1930's Germany situation arise where minorities, i.e. jews,gypsies,homosexuals et al. were singled out as being, quite rightly, detrimental to the host nation. Forget arguing the finer points with jews. They will stick it out arguing all sorts of bullshit that is intended to wrap us up in knots. A jew is a jew fullstop.
__________________
This bus is "Whites only". Your bus will be along in 3-4 hours. The number one enemy of the white race is the jew. Number two is rabbi john jewtree. His concubines included. |
April 4th, 2009 | #54 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
|
|
April 4th, 2009 | #55 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Once the great goose that laid the golden egg of civilization and human progress, the white race, is destroyed, the world as we know it will, without a doubt, regress to the jungle. The white race has been in the vanguard of all human progress, and without it, there will be no civilization as we know it. The vast majority of all the exploring, discoveries, inventions, etc. that have benefited humanity as a whole have been by the hand of the great white race, and to deny this self-evident truth would, indeed, be a lie. |
|
April 4th, 2009 | #56 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
|
|
April 4th, 2009 | #57 |
deken
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
|
Shouldn't you research Don Black before you make spurious claims of defamation? You claim you know nothing about him yet you criticize someone making comments about him.
|
April 4th, 2009 | #58 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
QUOTE=Larry Heinberg;969259]"Well yeah, I them, your honour, but I know for a fact that some other dude killed 3 times as many people!"
And I'm not a Jew anyway. Stop this nonsense. Just by reading your name and your posts, what else is one to think? I know almost nothing about either of them. So... 50-50. It's just a deduction. Race membership is decided by luck. Not at all, old sport, it is decided by whether one's parents are miscegenetic or not. Class membership is decided by relevant factors (e.g., wealth). Therefore, judgements based on race will be, on average, less accurate than judgements based on class. Not at all; it is a proven fact that mud races are more violent than whites, as an example. Personally I doubt there'd be more than one or two people who would be in a position to use either sort of judgement. Just curious, old sport, are you British, or are you misspelling "judgment" that way on purpose? What biological and genetic attributes of race? Besides morphology, none that I know of apply to all members. Class is (or can be) different in that regard. When judging one race against another, one must deal in averages, not individuals, and it is a fact that niggers, on average, are some 15% lower in IQ than whites are, and also some 50,000 years behind us in evolution. |
April 4th, 2009 | #59 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
The point was not whether or not Lasher knew Don Black, it was whether or not we should disparage one another in here, wasn't it? It is possible that the person posting against him has a personal grudge.
|
April 4th, 2009 | #60 | |
deken
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
|
Quote:
Black may or may not have been one of us at one time. His wife helps non-Whites, his son and he both embrace the Republican Party, a tool of the Jew, and he is a proven liar. He employs anti-White moderators in his scam and uses donations to send family members to exotic vacations as shown on David Duke's own web site. Surely you are not inferring Black is one of us now? |
|
Tags |
jewed thread |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|