Paul Weyrich on conservatism vs ideology

[Alex Linder]

The Next Conservatism: The Danger of the Ideological State

If there is one clear lesson from the 20th century, it is that all ideologies are dangerous. As Russell Kirk wrote, conservatism is not an ideology, it is the negation of ideology. Conservatism values what has grown up over time, over many generations, in the form of traditions, customs and habits.

For example, cutting the heart out of living victims, a proud Aztec tradition.

Ideology, in contrast, says that on the basis of such-and-such a philosophy, certain things must be true. When reality contradicts that deduction, reality must be suppressed. And when an ideology takes over a state, the power of the state is used to accomplish that suppression. The state's citizens are forced to mouth lies.

So it is with the truth about race and jews today.

One of the new facts the next conservatism must address is the fact that America, for the first time in its history, has become an ideological state. The ideology commonly known as "political correctness" or "multiculturalism" now shapes the actions of government in thousands of ways. Under the rubric of "hate crimes," it sentences American citizens to additional time in jail for political thoughts. As "affirmative action," it "privileges" women, blacks and homosexuals over heterosexual white males. In some cases, it requires private businesses to give their employees "sensitivity training," psychological conditioning in obedience to the state ideology, including its demand that everyone express approval of homosexuality. Employees who demur lose their jobs.

This is jews pursuing the jewish agenda. If you don't grasp that PC springs from jews and would not exist or be 1/100th as powerful as it is without them, you don't understand it.

It is ironic that after the catastrophic failure of ideologies in the 20th century in Russia, Germany, Italy and many other countries, America should now head down the same road. How did it happen? While conservatives slept, ideology crept in on little cat feet, taking over all our cultural institutions, just as Gramsci demanded in his "long march." As I have said before, culture is more powerful than politics.

And race is more fundamental than culture.

What should the next conservatism do about it? First, it needs to reveal this ideology for what it is. In terms of its historical origins and basic nature, it is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. The translation was undertaken largely by the unorthodox Marxists of the Frankfurt School - Horkheimer, Adorno, Fromm, Reich and Marcuse, to name the most important players.

These must be identified as jews, which precedes and outweighs their marxism. Conservatives must begin at the beginning, and that means explicitly acknowledging the racial basis of the 'American experiment.'

Contrary to Marx, they said that the culture is not just part of society's "superstructure," but an independent and very important variable. They concluded that for Communism to be possible in the West, traditional Western culture and the Christian religion first had to be destroyed - a destruction to be accomplished by "critical theory" and "studies in prejudice," to use their terms. Most important, they realized they could not destroy our historic culture through philosophical arguments. They turned instead to a much more powerful weapon, psychological conditioning, in effect crossing Marx with Freud. Marcuse then injected the whole poisonous brew into the baby boom generation in the 1960s. The result? A brilliant success for them: America now has a Marxist ideology, not the Marxism of the Soviet Union but cultural Marxism, imbedded in and supported by the power of the state.

The next conservatism needs to shout from the housetops, "People, here's what this stuff really is. It's not about 'being nice' or 'toleration.' It's about destroying our culture and our religion, and it is succeeding."

It's about jews declaring war on Whites, intending our genocide.

Then, when we have the American people behind us, which we will once they learn the real nature of "PC," we need to comb through every law, every government regulation, every federal office and department and weed the cultural Marxism out. The goal should not be to replace it with any ideology of our own - again, if we are real conservatives, we don't have one - but to restore a non-ideological American state, which is what we had up until the wretched 1960s.

Superficial. Rather, Whites must identify as Whites, with jews pointedly excluded and name the main, and really the only enemy, since the coloreds they use as tools are headless, and the problems they cause would disappear if jews did not control the laws to allow them.

Cultural Marxism is a particularly nasty ideology, as we see all around us in its products (just turn on the television; the cultural Marxists took over Hollywood decades ago). But all ideology is wrong, because the concept of ideology is wrong in itself. Society cannot be made to fit some abstract scheme dreamed up by this or that thinker, and attempts to make it do so always result in disaster. To see the truth, all we need to do is compare most aspects of life in America in the 1950s, our last non-ideological decade, with life now. The next conservatism should work to get our old country back.

No matter how bad things grow, jews will always claim the fifties with the freedom called segregation were worse. As jews control the moral high ground -- television and the big papers -- no weakling conservatives will be able to challenge them. The only challenge to jewish power than can be effective is one that forthrightly names the jew the prime enemy and urges Whites to identify racially. Then and only then is the battle joined.

Paul M. Weyrich is the Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.

[John in Woodbridge]

Something I was thinking about is how the media, from FoxNews to talk radio, always frame the debate as Liberal V. Conservative, in the contemporary text. At this point it is a meaningless debate, meant to keep the lemmings occupied while jews and plutocracy do what they do unabated.

Or another way they frame the debate is between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, even though in reality there is very little difference between them.

Not all jews are Marxists, but all Marxists are Marxists.

Making this an in-your-face racial war/fight is repeating Hitlers propaganda mistake.

Weyrich hits the nail square on the head. But I dont know whats left for him to conserve with conservitism.

Weyrich is an uncommon name. I went to to gradeschool with a girl named this. She had long red hair and was very well developed for her age. She had large breasts and her her hips were wide. She walked and talked like a grown woman. I used to think about her a lot.

Ok it's out of my system. I just saw that "Weyrich" over and over again. That girl was really beautiful. Weyrich. Sorry about the off-topic.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Tench

Not all jews are Marxists, but all Marxists are Marxists.

Making this an in-your-face racial war/fight is repeating Hitlers propaganda mistake..

Conservatives have been following the path of NOT making it a racial war for 100 years, and they've lost every single battle.

Hitler's path -- White vs jew, in our context -- is the one path that can lead to victory.

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

Conservatives have been following the path of NOT making it a racial war for 100 years, and they've lost every single battle.

Hitler's path -- White vs jew, in our context -- is the one path that can lead to victory.

Kosher Conservatism has gotten us to this state.
Only by naming the jew will anything happen.