Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old November 19th, 2004 #41
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

10. "Liberia" the African country founded by repatriated American slaves has a population of roughly 3.4 million today. Liberians also have a mean IQ of 65. According to Wechsler's adult intelligence scale, persons with IQs ranging from 50-65 are certified morons.

9. In 1909, W.E.B. Dubois, jew Julius Rosenthal, jew Lillian Wald, Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch, jew Stephen Wise and jew Henry Malkewitz formed the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).

8. The population of the U.S state and federal prisons rose to a record 1,470,000 million people in 2003.

7. Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence involving
blacks and whites in the U.S. every year, 90 percent are committed by blacks against whites. Blacks are up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence to whites than the reverse.

6. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. has agreed to pay $40 million to jewish lawyers for marketing their clothes to White Americans. The consent decree calls for Abercrombie & Fitch to hire a vice president of diversity and hire up to 25 diversity recruiters. The company was also forced to promise that its marketing materials would reflect mongrelization.

5. Only 50% of Harvard's student body are "white appearing". Closer inspection reveals that half are jews. Similar results have been achieved by "affirmative action" programs in colleges across the country but especially in the post-American Ivy League.

4. US President George W. Bush signed into law a bill requiring the State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism and rate countries annually on their treatment of Jews

3...[/QUOTE]

Good stuff! Keep feeding such, it's useful.
 
Old November 19th, 2004 #42
Agis
biocultural Realpolitik
 
Agis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ZooSA
Posts: 697
Default

3. In 2004 the US spent $398 billion dollars on the military. In the same year some 3 million illegal aliens crossed the border. U.S. services and benefits given to legal and illegal immigrants cost American taxpayers approx. $68 billion per year.

2. Approved by voters in 1994, Proposition 187 would have denied health care, education and welfare benefits to illegal immigrants. Almost immediately, jew Judge Mariana Pfaelzer granted its opponents' request for a restraining order, which prevented it from taking effect. In a statement, ACLU spokesman jew Mark Rosenbaum said jew Pfaelzer correctly denied California's attempt to regulate immigration.

1. On May 17, 1954 segregated schooling was ruled "unconstitional" at the behest of the jew-dominated NAACP in Brown vs. Board on the pretext that "segregation has a tendency to [retard] the educational and mental development of negro children".
__________________
.
.
CREATIVITY NOW! http://tinyurl.com/6buj85
 
Old November 19th, 2004 #43
JB112
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 324
Default

Ok, I did some revisions, corrections, and added graphics. Now it's just for the readers to complete the sentence about adl's criminal record.

Background to the ADL

In America there exists a quasi-police organization which operates outside the law, and in many ways above it. It's called the Anti-Defamation League, and can be thought of as the inchoate (get your dictionaries out, kids) Thought Police for the coming American police state. It keeps detailed records on thousands of Americans whose political views and activities fall outside the bounds of political correctness. Its agents gather intelligence (spy) on literally tens of thousands of fully law-abiding Americans. Huge databases are kept by its regional offices. It has a direct working relationship with both the FBI and with nationwide police departments, both on an official level and through general corruption and under-the-radar dealing.

In the former, agents of the ADL's political indoctrination wing (its "experts on extremism") hammer into the heads of rank-and-file cops that Americans whose political views do not correspond to the ADL's agenda are security risks and de facto terrorists, in preparation for the time in which the ADL plans to prosecute and judge these "political criminals" -- a concept completely alien to our founders.

The ADL is also a tremendously powerful political lobbying organization. It single-handedly developed the concept of law called "hate crime" which presumes to punish the political views of a criminal if those views fall outside the bounds of ADL approval. In other words, if one of you reading this paper were to be violently attacked by one of those affirmative action admittees at your university, and you defended yourself, your charge and sentence would be inflated to penalize you personally for your political views and affiliations, and to create a climate of intimidation against all who share those views -- and a legal foot-in-the-door for the future prosecution of those views themselves.

That is what it boils down to. These laws are merely a prelude and a launch-pad for laws, already drafted by the ADL, which criminalize all forms of political speech and all publications which do not conform to the ADL's agenda -- such as the one you're reading. In classic shell-speak, the ADL refers to all dissent from it's own despicable agenda as "hate," in order to de-legitimize it.

In any case, the agenda of the ADL is to eliminate the first amendment and silence all of those who it considers a threat to its own aims.

The ADL styles itself as a "civil rights" organization. Civil rights in this context means the right of jews to control others and suppress any group whose ideas or activity threatens that control. The ADL is and always has been a purely jewish-interest organization.

It's full name is the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rth -- B'nai B'rth meaning literally, "Sons of the Cut," in reference to the jewish ritual practice of circumcision. Its genesis out of the international jewish society of that name is a story in itself.

In 1913, a jew who was a member of this body, Leo Frank, raped and murdered a young female employee at his Atlanta pencil factory, the beautiful Mary Phagan. After Frank was convicted and sentenced to death for his crime, his influential jewish friends went to work on the government and secured a commutation of his sentence. The enraged citizenry promptly lynched him. This gave the jews a bit of a scare, and in response they set up the Anti-Defamation League. Therefore it is ridiculous for the ADL to claim to be anything other than a jewish-interest organization, dedicated to nothing else.


Left: Mary Phagan, raped and murdered by... Center: the jew Leo Frank, inspired the creation of the ADL Right: Justice served.

The agenda of the ADL is at once leftist and Zionist, a duality under which most jews live. Ethnocentrism and hyper-organized political assertiveness for them -- pluralism and tolerance for you. Disagree? Hate! Tomorrow? Jail. That is what ADL is aiming for, and what we at The Aryan Alternative will never permit.

The basis of its leftist agenda is the old jewish maxim that 'jews are safest in a society without an ethnic basis.'

In other words, in an orderly society of a single ethnic group, jews, as the sole minority, would stand out and be watched closely. Their misbehavior, scheming, and general contempt for their host would be noticed, as has always been the case, resulting in the normal human reaction to jew -- anti-Semitism.

For the jew then, the 'smart strategy,' which he has perfected in America, is to promote an ideology which he calls "pluralism," or, of newer vintage, "diversity." A more proper term for this ideology and the strategy behind it would be "jewish camouflage." Jews become "just another group," and have numerous new allies against "the majority," who naturally resists this takeover of its society. Therefore, the majority group will always be the dreaded and hated enemy of the jew, and the target of its unbridled abuse and attack. The aim is always to subvert its culture, eliminate its unity and identity, and ultimately to dissolve its existence. Thus jewish leftism.

Zionism is simply another word for Judaism; political Judaism, Judaism applied. The ADL, while fervently promoting every form of leftist lunacy in America, backs unconditionally the ethnic state of Israel, its genocide against the Palestinians, and characterizes any opposition to this agenda also as 'hate' and 'anti-Semitism.' With such unmasked hypocrisy and amazing chutzpah -- Hebrew Hubris -- it is no wonder that the jews want -- and need -- to silence their opponents.


Abe Foxman, ADL's head kike

There is more to the story of the ADL: it has a criminal record that could rival any [come up with something, readers], including large-scale police corruption, bribery, espionage for foreign governments, and direct ties with organized crime on a massive scale, from which much of it's funding is drawn. But that is for another issue.

For now, let us just simply christen the ADL as America's most dangerous hate group, dedicated to the destruction of the white race, and the foremost domestic threat to the freedoms Americans cherish.
 
Old November 21st, 2004 #44
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default Movie Review: "Gangs of New York"

Movie Review: 'Gangs of New York'

by T.C. Lynch

"Gangs of New York" is an absolutely magnificent movie. It is Martin Scorsese's best movie -- ever. Better even than "Taxi Driver," which has been my favorite of his films until now.

"Gangs" is the story of the conflict between two criminals, Bill "the Butcher" Cutting (Daniel Day Lewis) and Amsterdam Vallon (Leonardo di Caprio), in New York's "Five Points" during the American Civil War. Bill the Butcher is the head of the "Native Americans" gang, fighting for the interests of those who descended from the original settlers and founders of the United States against recent immigrants, primarily from Ireland. The immigrants are represented by the "Dead Rabbits," a gang led by "Priest" Vallon (Liam Neeson).

The prologue of "Gangs" is set around fourteen years before the main story. The Dead Rabbits and the Native Americans meet to settle, by the "ancient laws of combat," who has control over Five Points. The battle is the most savage and gut-wrenching I have seen on screen since "Braveheart." In the end Priest Vallon is mortally wounded and then dispatched by Bill the Butcher while young Amsterdam Vallon looks on in horror. Orphaned, he is taken to a reformatory, where he nurses his resentment, gets into a lot of fights, and dreams of revenge.

All grown up, Amsterdam returns to New York, joins Bill the Butcher's gang, and gains first his trust and then his love, becoming the son he never had. And the love of Bill the Butcher is not something to be spurned. Not because he is a dangerous criminal who might take revenge, but because he is a truly heroic and noble man, one of the most remarkable characters in film and literature -- ever. And his portrayal by Daniel Day Lewis is one of the greatest film performances -- ever. (Given the mounting exposure of Jewish evil in the world, it only makes sense that Lewis and Scorsese were passed over in the Oscars. The Jew Brody received the Best Actor and the Jew Polansky the Best Director Oscars for what must be the six millionth holocaust flick, "The Pianist.")

Torn between his feelings for Bill the Butcher, who is the greatest man he has ever met, and the dead father he barely knew, Amsterdam chooses revenge. Not that Amsterdam is unable to appreciate Bill the Butcher's greatness. But in the end he succumbs to his own smallness. His chosen method of revenge is equally small and cowardly. Instead of meeting Bill the Butcher in open combat, as "Priest" Vallon did, Amsterdam tries to assassinate the Butcher "like a sneak thief" with a throwing knife while he is celebrating the anniversary of his victory over the Priest.

It is an act of revenge that dishonors not only Amsterdam, but also his father, who was cut from the same noble stuff as Bill the Butcher. The Butcher respects him as the "only man he ever killed worth remembering." It is a brutal irony that Priest Vallon was better honored by the man who killed him than by the son who avenged him.

The assassination fails, and Bill the Butcher leaves Amsterdam alive, to experience the shame of his cowardice and defeat and perhaps to recover his honor, just as "Priest" Vallon once let a defeated Bill the Butcher live to redeem himself. The Butcher's mistake is that such tactics only work against honorable men, and Amsterdam Vallon is not an honorable man. Amsterdam Vallon is supposed to be the hero of this film, but he is utterly despicable, and he never redeems himself in the end.

"Gangs" proves that director Scorsese is a genius of subversion. Like Travis Bickle in "Taxi Driver," Bill the Butcher presents a coherent and compelling critique of the society of his time. And like Travis Bickle, Bill the Butcher is portrayed as a psychopath and a criminal. But both Bickle and The Butcher are alienated and "maladjusted" because they are idealists frustrated by the corruption of the world around them. They take to violence only because society falls short of their ideals. They see violence as the only way to restore the proper order of things. They are instruments of a higher justice, a justice that requires the system be overthrown.

Hollywood would never allow the sentiments of Travis Bickle or Bill the Butcher to be uttered by heroes, but they think it safe to put them in the mouths of villains. Smugly conventional people will, of course, dismiss anything said by a criminal or a "psycho," no matter how coherent and compelling. But people with minds accept the truth no matter who speaks it. People of honor admire heroism no matter who displays it.

Bill the Butcher is a far more articulate hero than Travis Bickle, and "Gangs" presents a far more complex criticism of American society than "Taxi Driver." According to Bill the Butcher, America is not an "idea" like freedom or equality. It is not a political or economic "system" like capitalism or democracy. America is an organic community, a community of blood: a community purchased by the blood of its founders to safeguard the blood of their posterity. Bill the Butcher's father spilled his blood fighting for America. Bill the Butcher was born in this country. And that, to his mind, should count for something. He has a birthright, a blood right, not a mere abstract "human" right that does not distinguish him from a Hottentot or a Papuan.

Because of his philosophy of Blood and Soil, Bill the Butcher is opposed to immigration. He sees immigration for what it was then, and what it is now: A tool by which raceless, rootless men dispossess Americans of their birthrights. In "Gangs" the two representatives of this type are Abraham Lincoln and Boss Tweed.

In a brilliant sequence, Scorsese shows how Lincoln's men took desperate young Irishmen right off one boat, enlisted them in the Union army to dispossess Southerners of their birthrights, and then loaded them onto another boat -- while at the same time offloading coffin upon coffin of his victims. This is why Bill the Butcher throws a knife into a poster of Lincoln and starts a riot at a performance of "Uncle Tom's Cabin." He sees that Lincoln's artificial "Union" devoted to the "proposition" of equality is the mortal enemy of an organic community based on blood. The blood of White men is more valuable than the blood of Blacks. So there is no reason for White men to die for the freedom of Blacks.

Boss Tweed uses immigrant votes to defeat nativist candidates, running the same people through the polls again and again until the votes cast outnumber the potential voters. Don't laugh. That is how your votes are being nullified today.

Another category of raceless profiteers on immigration are the businessmen who use it to depress wages, paying an Irishman a nickel to do the job an American once did for a dollar. Nothing, apparently, has changed.

The main objects of Bill the Butcher's wrath are the Irish, but it is clear that he opposes the Irish because they are immigrants, not the immigrants because they are Irish. Indeed, the man in the film he admires most is Priest Vallon, and he employs Irishmen in his gang. This is important to note, because one effect of "Gangs" is to exacerbate Irish resentment against the American establishment and promote a mindless attachment to open borders, because, after all, the Irish were unwelcome immigrants too. Just for the record: I love Irish people, Irish literature, and Irish folk music. But that does not blind me to what I like to call "the Irish Question."

There is an Irish Question for the same reason that there is a Jewish Question: the Irish are good at holding grudges, and they have carried their grudge against the English to America, directing it against the White Anglo-Saxon Protestants who founded and used to run this country. The divisive presence of the Irish was an important factor in the rise of our present Jew-dominated system, and although the Irish are slated for eventual extermination along with the rest of us, they still enjoy a higher status in the propasphere than any other White ethnic group.

That's why Americans all celebrate Saint Patrick's Day, but not Saint George's Day. That's why on television and in the movies so many of the positive White characters (crusading liberal attorneys, meddling social workers, sensitive cops, and all manner of career girls) have Irish names. That's why the multicultural "Rainbow Confederates" of the League of the South promote the myth of a "Celtic" Confederacy in a pathetic attempt to align themselves with a Jew-approved White ethnic category, which in effect would assure them only of being on the LAST cattle car to the extermination camps.

In this context, Amsterdam Vallon can be seen, not merely as an individual Irishman, but as a symbol of the Irish Question. He has inherited a grudge. He is sick with self-pity and eaten up by resentment. He tosses his Bible in the river when released from the reformatory, but uses the Catholic Church as a rallying place when it suits him politically. He even prays for victory. In his resentment against Bill the Butcher, the American of Blood and Soil, he allows himself to be used by Boss Tweed, the rootless System man, to strip Americans of their birthrights. He is too stupid, or too blinded by his own pettiness, to see that the system he is aiding will in the end destroy him and his kind too. [next]
 
Old November 21st, 2004 #45
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

The fact that the same System is at war with both Americans and immigrants is underscored by the backdrop of the film's climax: the great New York draft riots of 1863. When the System began to draft men into the Union army, but allowed the rich to buy exemptions, the poor rioted. Politicians and Blacks were lynched; the military was called in to restore order; thousands were killed. Scorsese's handling of the riots is brilliant. (They were especially satisfying to me because he smashes and burns all the props and accessories from his worst movie, "The Age of Innocence." These were so obtrusive that the film seemed like a cross between Merchant-Ivory and the Home Shopping Network.)

"Gangs" has been criticized because the riots overwhelm and literally obscure the battle between Bill the Butcher and Amsterdam Vallon. But that's the point. The great tragedy of this film is the tragedy of the White race as a whole: We are divided by language, culture, religion, and ancient, senseless grudges, which drive the best of us -- the Bill the Butchers and Priest Vallons -- to slaughter each other, when we should be uniting to destroy the System that was, and still is, destroying us.

T.C. LYNCH

This review will be good for #2
 
Old November 21st, 2004 #46
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

The Conservative Conceit

by Douglas Wright

6 February 2004

The most laughable self-delusion of mainstream conservatives these days goes roughly as follows: "I'm conservative, but I'm not racist. In fact, liberals are the real racists. Why else would they believe in affirmative action and welfare? Stereotyping minorities as helpless -- now that's racist." Whereupon, an eager young Republican becomes misty-eyed and imagines himself braving the hose blasts in Alabama whilst warbling "We Shall Overcome."

Oh, and don't forget, these Eddie Haskells of freeperdom love to add: Republican Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves, while Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a Democrat, was a member of the Ku Klux Klan. Right. Rattle off these townhall.com geek-facts to a clutch of corn-rowed bubble-jacket boolies in East New York and see how far it gets you. So whatchoo sayin', son? I gots to be GOP? Da free market is mad tight? Fo-shizzle!

There is trace validity to this racism-denial by conservatives, particularly the exposure of white liberals as having a paternalistic attitude toward blacks. Which they do, but because the paternalism benefits blacks materially, it's the lonely black who's genuinely upset by it. Hookers may not be proud of what they do, but they don't turn down the cash. Conservative "outrage" about how the poor blacks are turned lazy by liberals and their welfare, by contrast, is heavily feigned. But feign they do, working themselves into a righteous lather about how Arthur Laffer is the true heir to Martin Luther King, Jr. Go tell it on the mountain!

But the truth is that conservatism and racism are closely linked. Both summon experience and instinct as guides, both are jealous of territory, and neither flout natural orders for very long. It's the subconscious realization of this truth that prompts mainstream conservatives go to ridiculous lengths to convince the world -- and themselves -- that they're not racist. The attempt at self-delusion manifests itself in such tomes as Liberal Racism by Jim Sleeper or The End of Racism by Dinesh D'Souza, elevation of such ridiculous characters as Alan Keyes to presidential candidacy primacy, or pretending that J.C. Watts was congressional leadership material instead of admitting what he really is, a nigger of the most common variety. Witness Republican conventions featuring "Turbo, the Republican Rapper." I know of what I speak. Shit like that used to get me excited.

The phenomenon reveals the mental gymnastics that even thoughtful, politically engaged people are willing to perform in order to avoid thinking honestly about race. Culture, class, values, economics -- conservatives will cling desperately to these abstractions to avoid facing the truth on the ground: blacks and Hispanics have not, cannot and will not be the raw material for a civilization that approaches anything like what they have in mind. Period. If you seek to conserve anything, conservatives, you must first seek to conserve the race that made it.


The antics are amusing. Debate along the liberal-conservative spectrum today is mostly a contest over whose ideology is most anti-racist. Conservatives will speak of "school choice" in the same reverent tones as liberals speak of "civil rights." Oppose "school choice," and why, who are you, Hitler? Oh, how good it feels to call the other side racist for once! I get a newsletter from a libertarian legal outfit called the Institute for Justice, which never fails to present itself as the champion of black women who would be launching their race to riches with hair-braiding establishments were it not for those burdensome regulations no doubt promulgated by big-government racists at the health department.

Liberals and conservatives are tripping over each other in a mad scramble to grab the golden ring of multiracialism. I even read an essay recently in which the writer compared the Janet Jackson tit flash to Weimar Germany. Yeah! Our declining values can only be a preview of Nazi takeover! Never mind living, breathing Jews pumping this stuff in 2004. Let's talk about those darn racists! It's almost as if conservatives, aware that they're "behind" when it comes to multiracial hipness, are pouring most of their energy into this pursuit, rather than, say, I don't know, preserving our culture and some semblance of American freedom.

The same realization also explains why "conservatism," even in its most defanged incarnations, still retains a hint of the forbidden. In a typical college campus showdown, the lefties, liberals and other crunchy activists will chant that the College Republicans are a bunch of racists. On cue, the Republicans will deny it, holding up their pictures of the brown-skinned Dinesh D'Souza like silver crosses. Affirmative action bake sale my ass. For those who've missed it, campus Bushies have been attempting to garner attention with bake sales that offer different prices for similarly-sized cookies depending on who's buying: $1 for whites, 25 cents for blacks, etc. Tee-hee. The point being, all the races are the same, and isn't affirmative action silly? Only in Amerikwa could students get in trouble for a stunt that only seeks to affirm racial equality. But what's really going on is that the darkies sense, correctly, that however superficially sincere the point of the exercise, the College Republicans are Polo-wearing white kids contemptuous of blacks and reluctant to associate with them unless they're Tiger Woods. The random Asian in the club only serves to strengthen the point.

White liberals and white conservatives differ very little in their core regard for blacks. Deep down, white liberals correctly see blacks as a perpetually inferior breed. If one happens to spring from the pack and start working calculus functions in grade school, they're happy, but they really don't have high expectations for the group. Most are interested more in feeling good about themselves, which for them comes from doing whatever they think will create the impression of black success. White liberals have little interest in getting too close to blacks, unless it's in zoo-like settings where they can ooh and aah over their naturalness but there's thick plexiglass in case anything gets out of hand. So, you'll find them putting up paintings of blacks or watching PBS specials about jazz, but never wandering around the Bronx after dark. White conservatives aren't much different. They don't feel quite the compulsion to watch PBS, but still like to think of themselves as non-racist "good guys." In the end, I think the only difference between white liberals and white conservatives is where they prefer to send the check: the welfare office or the prison. Why don't we stop writing the checks altogether?


The conservative conceit is funny, yes, but maddening. It's indicative of a political thought process that seeks self-pleasure, not truth, and is thus understandable but not honorable. The conservative failure to see the truth of racial difference is killing the white race. Conservatives, it's time to come down off the trapeze and get to work.

This will be good for issue#2.
 
Old November 23rd, 2004 #47
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

I dont think you should wait to get rid of all of 1 or 1a before you lay out 2. If possible. To keep the ball rolling.
 
Old November 23rd, 2004 #48
Chain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Found my media mail copies at my front door when I returned from out of town yesterday; distributed some this morning.

Re content: Especially liked Victor's and Alex' pieces. The Aryan girl cartoon is excellent. I would hope that an Aryan girl cartoon of some sort can appear in every single issue- an unofficial "trademark".

Have only seen brief segments of "Survivor" and had read Victor's original story online about 2 years past. And the story is still highly entertaining.
What is the whole story on negress Vecepia Towery? Is there anything to write about her?

As someone else wrote earlier- I also didn't much care for "Shit Magnet" for the same reasons already written.

As to what I'd like to see added:
1. Letters to the editor- when they roll in.
2. More racial cartoons. Hitler had a lot to say about the necessary simplicity of propaganda. Cartoons get the point across quickly, and even to the most unsophisticated and youthful of readers.
3. Print more quotes of Jews- and state explicitly that all are Jewish quotes- in case less aware readers might have some doubts. This should be a
regul;ar feature, in my opinion- and I think I read that Alex said it would be.
4. This one is my favorite. I strongly believe that an entire page should be dedicated to mini-photos (SHRINK them!) of mud murderers, rapists, robbers- flim-flammers etc. This is a would be a visual mayhem
"confirmation" of the Multicult Zoo Whites have to look at every day on ZOG's streets. And the muds' White victims should be shown too, especially when the White victim is an extremely attractive Aryan woman. Because this resonates with Aryan men of all ages- every single time!

The briefest of accounts could be given- "Accused/convicted..." etc., perhaps with direct links to VNN forum threads on the given crimes. We'd thereby drive more readers into VNN Forum.

Non-White crime is a huge fact which is regularly denied and covered up- Alex, you even mentioned how it's done in your review of Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451; it is all simply ignored and made high societal taboo to broach or breach.

I'll be sorely disappointed if we can't have a regular page chock full of mini-mugshots. If there is a copyright issue on the photos....well, there must be a software out there which can turn photos into graphic artistic "representation" sketches. If one would tweak the original just slightly, I would think that the copyright issue could be legally defeated.
In "Thunderbolt of Truth", Dr. Demarius regularly shows photos. I rather doubt that he has received permissions and paid for same- so the issue may be legally moot enough to circumscribe.
 
Old November 24th, 2004 #49
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Understood. I avoided that this first issue. Others hit it hard. I'm going to hit it more next issue. I want to incorporate context, mug shots, white victims and hate crimes. So they get the whole package. I can sum it up in one sentence, then document the facts with the cream of the stats. Then go for the heart with the specific hush crimes. Note that VNN invented the term hush crime, and we can promote it most effectively.

I showed the Wolzek survivor story to an outsider who agreed it was effective - as opposed to the intellectual, abstract stuff. People WATCH survivor. We don't have to pre-educate them. This is the value of writing about TV. We have to get the people where they are, wherever that is.
 
Old November 24th, 2004 #50
prozak
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder
I showed the Wolzek survivor story to an outsider who agreed it was effective - as opposed to the intellectual, abstract stuff.
It seems to me that there's almost a need for two types of propaganda: one to compete with TV, and one to compete with what passes for books these days.

I miss Scott Fitzgerald.
 
Old December 8th, 2004 #51
JB112
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 324
Default American democracy

Fact box/blub for issue 2, just in time for "the holidays."

AOL poll:
(12/08/04)

Are you OK with Christmas music in public school?

Yes 95%

No 5%

Are you OK with Christmas displays in a local parade?

Yes 97%

No 3%

[211,500 votes]

Are jews okay with it? No.

Christianity: BANNED

You live under a jewish dictatorship, White American.

...

Did you know: More than 60,000 Christians were expelled from their homes in Israel by the jews when they took over Palestine in the 1940s. Before the creation of the state of Israel there were more than half a million Christians living in Palestine alongside the Muslim majority. Today less than a third remain, and constitute only two percent of the population. This figure is significant, however, in that it is the same percentage of the population which jews constitute in America. Think about that...

The above can be shortened if necessary.
 
Old December 9th, 2004 #52
EdbergEdberg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink Suggestions for future tabloid propaganda

Be sure to include one story each that deals with the following two issues:

1. Anti-Iraq war propaganda, and just plain anti-Jews' war in general

2. Propaganda bashing the present anti-male family-law legal system that is destroying white families by promoting divorce and rule by women.

Neither of these two issues deals directly with the race issue, but both are very important for us, and both are key battlegrounds for the Jews to wage war against the white race. And many, many white males who do not yet think racially can easily understand and relate to both issues. Both can be used to gain sympathy from non-racially-thinking white males and pull them into our way of thinking.

The war in Iraq is terrible right now and will only get much, much worse. We need to make the most of this and go on record with the masses as opposing it. We need to likewise take advantage of the present corrupt legal system that is so anti-paternalism regarding traditonal marriage.

Hell, Karl Rove got the bum Bush re-elected just on the queer marriage issue. We should be able to use the ongoing anti-man-husband-father campaign of the Jews and feminists to destroy traditonal white families to our advantage.

Both an anti-war story and a pro-husband/fatherss story should at least begin on the front page of the next issue. It will be a great way to pull the average young-adult white male into the paper, to get his interest and suck him in. These two issues will appeal to all white males who are in their teens up through their forties regardless of their educational level or income level.
 
Old December 10th, 2004 #53
EdbergEdberg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thanks for the compliments

The secret to good writing is that it flow seamlessly with absolutely no hitches in thought, grammar or logic that will snag the reader and force him to pause and try to figure out what the writer is saying. If the average reader has to stop once to figure out what is going on in the piece, then he is likely to bail out of the article and go onto another story (especially with newspaper readers). If he has to repeatedly stop to figure out what the writer is saying, then reading the piece becomes too much work and virtually all readers will grow weary and quit.

Too many people think that the mark of good and "intellectual" writing is that it should be overly complex and difficult to comprehend... in other words, just plain confusing. Kinda like a Bob Dylan song -- or the Bible -- loaded up with double entendres and hidden meanings, etc. Jews make a habbit of writing this way, but all great Aryan writers make their ideas complex but their writing style simple and easy to understand. In contrast, Jews use complex and confusing writing to hide that they have simple ideas... or bullshit ideas.

Actually, it's not easy to write concise and easy to understand prose, especially when dealing with complex subject matter. It takes skill and effort and usually a lot of editing and several re-writes to turn out something that reads effortlessly.

I've had to cut back on my time here on the forum of late. Perhaps this would give me some extra time to work on something for publication for Alex. But, really, he already has a very good stable of capable writers.
 
Old December 17th, 2004 #54
JB112
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 324
Default We need separation of Synogauge and State

Blair lighting menorah

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...jrm10412082215

Bush lighting menorah

http://www.detnews.com/pix/2002/12/09/a05blitz11.jpg

Bushy in yarmulke

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/i.../[email protected]

Bush swears allegiance to Israel's flag

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/12/im...flag_small.jpg
 
Old December 23rd, 2004 #55
Polybius
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 175
Default

Let's not forget the old saying, a picture is worth a thousand words...btw...let's not forget a small donation to VNN at Christmas time...trudge on down to the mail box with your Christmas & New Years Greetings for VNN...money is speech!
 
Old December 24th, 2004 #56
brutus
Senior Member
 
brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: naples
Posts: 11,123
Default

The jew and his control of all TV.

__________________
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
 
Old December 25th, 2004 #57
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default Issue #2 deadline WEDNESDAY 29 DECEMBER 2004

Final call for issue #2. I will be making final cuts and pre-layout edits by THIS WEDNESDAY.

Any pics, cartoons, quotations, stories that can quickly be rewritten, facts, graphs, stats, original stories that you think should be used, post them/links on this thread.
 
Old December 26th, 2004 #58
brutus
Senior Member
 
brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: naples
Posts: 11,123
Default

Bigger pic of LORD VISHJEW

__________________
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
 
Old December 30th, 2004 #59
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default composing #2 all day Thursday...make your last-minute submissions

Any graphics, quotations, or statistics you want to see in TAA #2, I'll be formatting it up all day Thursday. I have the main articles, but little nuggets are still useful.
 
Old December 30th, 2004 #60
Dresden
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 49
Default Submission

Alex,

Since I am only adding input to this forum concerning crucial issues, I believe any sports section (or perhaps any specialized section) should start with a small 'Did you know?' box. My personal recommendation would be a box stating the race of the major sports commisioners, and their impossible overrepresentation in those positions. People not interested in the racial struggle may have a bit of rust knocked loose if they realize they really have no part or interest at all in sports. By interest I mean it does not serve them of course, but only exists to drain the pockets of stupid goyim.

" Did you know that ALL of the commissioners for ALL major sports are ALL Jewish?

NBA Commissioner David Stern - Jewish
NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue - Jewish
MLB Commissioner Bud Selig - Jewish
NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman - Jewish

Now how the hell do people 2% of the population get 100% of the sports Commissioner Positions? That is an overrepresentation in the area of impossibility.

I believe the math is as follows; the chance of 4 Jews in these positions are (race percentage * number of positions versus population) (1/50 * 4/~200 mil)*(1/50 * 3/~200 mil)*(1/50 * 2/~200 mil)*(1/50 * 4/~200 mil) . This is based on an approximation of the number of positions versus all of the jobs in america, and the chance that all four would be jewish.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.
Page generated in 4.29413 seconds.