|
July 25th, 2012 | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Where the wild things live.
Posts: 332
|
|
July 25th, 2012 | #62 | |
Hrvatski Prijatelj
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SFV
Posts: 1,131
|
Quote:
|
|
July 25th, 2012 | #63 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Borrowing from Mike Todd's post, these salient fact are indisputable and resoundingly clear.
Quote:
|
|
July 25th, 2012 | #64 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
I live in England. We constantly repay our "debts" for what our ancestors supposedly did. Here's a few images of the debts being paid. Out of respect for her, I won't link to the picture of the elderly lady who found herself in worse circumstances. My country's media tells me white people did this. When faced with evidence like this: my country's social workers tell me that it's because they're underprivileged. I live in - according to Wiki - one of the top 20 towns in England for deprivation. It's also 98% white. We had no riots. My town's police reported one (1) 999 incident over the entire week of the riots - and that was a food fight in Mcdonalds. Could you use your social construction to explain this? This is from 11 years ago - another set of riots and a different ethnicity involved. This, I am assured, is not racist but coincidence. This is the punishment for carrying the flag of the UK through the streets of the UK. This gentleman lived in an England town where white people had been told not to be on the streets after 7.30pm. This is his punishment for disobeying. And the 11-year-ago riots? Those happened as a result of Asians disliking police presence and questioning after this happened. This is an ongoing compilation of young girls groomed for sex by older men. All those men have one thing in common - they are all muslims. Two more rings have been smashed in the past week that have not yet been added. Let me ask you something. Have you heard of Stephen Lawrence? Or Damilola Taylor? Of course you have - even from the other side of the world, you know those names and what happened to them. Have you heard of Kriss Donald? No? Gavin Hopley? No? Charlene Downes? I wonder why. When is the debt for "imperialism" cleared? When will my country be free of this? You call me and others "racists" and "bigots" for not wanting this? You would imply that it's in my imagination that the above incidents happened and almost exclusively involved gangs of the same ethnicity?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #65 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Filthydelphia
Posts: 10,095
|
Quote:
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,139
|
I used the following quote by Herr Linder during a debate with an old liberal girlfriend of mine.
"Liberals have such a loose grasp of logic and what contitutes "proof", it's almost unbelievable. They see a correlation between income and crime, and to them that's "proof" that poverty causes crime. How about this for another theory. The type of people who are mentally susceptible to violence and crime in general, are the very same type of people who do not have the cognitive ability to make something decent and honest with their lives. That would also leave you with a correlation between crime and poverty, and yet means the exact opposite to the theory that crime causes poverty. Why do liberals consider one theory and not the other? Answer me this, liberals. If "poverty" is the main cause of crime, then how come the overwhelming majority of poor people do not commit crime? If poverty was really the cause of crime then how come crime rates (per head of population) were lower in the Depression than they are now? How come crime rates in countries that suffer poverty unheard of in the United States, are lower than ours? The liberal theory that poverty causes crime is based on the arrogant, clueless and misinformed idea that the "criminals" are really just decent people who had the misfortune to be born into economic disadvantage. I don't think so. If it's all just about the stress involved in being poor, then how come the very same rich, successful people who lead some of the most stressful lives on the planet, and who have the highest suicide rates of all of us, aren't going round commiting violent crime? The idea that people commit crime "because their poverty leaves them no choice" is another liberal lie. The vast majority of crimes do NOT consist of people taking drastic steps to feed or clothe themselves. Killing someone for their IPod or their sneakers is not an act of economic desperation, it's the action of a sociopath, or a psychotic who views other people as cardboard cutouts." I would add to this that my mother was a school teacher in a poor neighborhood that was predominantly black. All of her oppressed black students seemingly had the latest Ipods and Iphones, a massive dvd and game collection, bling, the latest Fubu clothing, were never malnourished, and apparently plenty of spending money for skittles, energy drinks and other snacks. I currently live in a housing development which was once mostly White. Due to the economy many of the homes were foreclosed upon. Unable to sell the foreclosed homes the banks converted some to section 8 housing. In moved the niggers who got to live in $200,000 homes for $300 a month. All these niggers have very expensive rims on their cars. Some even drive Jaguars and Mercedes. I kid you not. Yet they are beneficiaries of every hand out imaginable. They often hold big parties at their houses with hired DJs blasting their vulgar rap music at nightclub level volumes. Some have even boasted to me that they have never paid income tax, in spite of holding good paying do nothing government jobs. |
July 25th, 2012 | #67 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
|
You guys, I just don't buy that there are inherent psychological differences between blacks and whites. That argument really isn't very sound, because it dismisses the huge number of exceptions to these stereotypes.
I makes much more sense to look at economic and environmental factors. |
July 25th, 2012 | #68 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
|
|
July 25th, 2012 | #69 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Right of Stormfront
Posts: 988
|
Quote:
And so you believe that your miniscule, two sentence response answers the mountain of evidence put forward to the contrary? Aren't you embarrassed that this is all you can come up with after all these thoughtful posts ... simple denial? You don't buy what anyone with an open mind can plainly see? Sorry, but you are merely out of your league. Just look harder: www.thugreport.com |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #70 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
|
real differences, tested and measured
Quote:
Brain activity and potential have an effect on psychology, if that is what you are interested in. |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #71 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
Did you note my economic and environmental factors? Or do they completely negate what you are claiming and so they can be safely ignored?
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #72 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
If you're going to hold the socially unpopular viewpoint, I'd think that you'd AT LEAST be acquainted with the most basic opposition so that you can argue against it. How is it that so few of you know what "social construction" means? Here's a really easy, basic example of "social construction" using gender: There's nothing biological that determines that girls like pink. There's not a "pink gene" that only girls get and a "blue gene" that boys get-- that wouldn't even make sense. Little girls like pink things because that color is assigned to them. We paint their nurseries pink and companies make pink toys. We tell them that pink is a "girl color," and they come to understand that the "right way" to be a girl means liking pink. Obviously not all girls like pink, but there are many, many more little girls who like it than little boys. And that's not a biological thing--it's because society tells them that's what they should like. |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #73 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
|
|
July 25th, 2012 | #74 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
Also, I never argued that blacks don't commit more crimes. What I'm arguing the why. It doesn't make sense to me (or to most prominent sociologists and anthropologists) that there is an inherent biological difference that causes this. I think that is has largely to do with outside factors. And, if you've ever opened a sociology textbook, you'd know that most contemporary researchers agree. |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #75 |
Hrvatski Prijatelj
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SFV
Posts: 1,131
|
Are you one of those people who believes that boys like guns and girls like dolls because society forces them to? I just want to know if you're worth arguing with.
|
July 25th, 2012 | #76 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
|
|
July 25th, 2012 | #77 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
So the meaning we attach to cockroaches as opposed to butterflies is a social construct, and really butterflies and coackroaches are equally good, desirable, and appealing....is that what you are trying to say? |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #78 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Right of Stormfront
Posts: 988
|
Quote:
For decades, whites have spent trillions of dollars, bent over backwards to their own detriment, to lift blacks up to what anybody would call equality, and yet these very people hold nothing but contempt for whites. What have whites gotten for their effort? The jews promoted multiculturalism and political correctness in America. All these things put together have proven destructive to our once great society. These manipulations have enabled the liberals, liberalism driven by jews mind you, to create double standards that are purposefully used against the White race. Should everyone be equal under the law in America? Of course they should. But because of manipulation stategized by a jew manipulated government and media, some people are more equal than others. The whole civil rights movement was anti-white to begin with. Affirmative Action was anti-white to begin with. Desegregation was anti-white, period. The 1965 Immigration Act was anti-white to begin with. The feminist movement was anti-white woman,(and anti-white man) period. The hate crime laws are also anti-white. Just see who has the term "hate crime" added to their sentences. Whites go along with all of these suicidal policies, just so they won't be called a racist. It's ridiculous. All these policies were promoted by jews, the ultimate anti-whites. http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Lbl/...eedToKnow.html |
|
July 25th, 2012 | #79 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
|
Black people and white people are the same species.
|
July 25th, 2012 | #80 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
|
Tags |
liberal, questions, social construction |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|