Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > The Struggle > The Strategy
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old February 18th, 2014 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Coach Strategies: Nick Saban: "Total-Control, Detail-Oriented, Evaluation-to-Graduation system"

If we, as a movement, or as individuals, want to succeed, we need to look at how winners do it, find the right model, and follow it.

From Sports Illustrated (August 2012):

Pat Buchanan says rising movement are intolerant. Same with successful people in every sector: they don't tolerate mistakes. They don't leave things to chance. They don't walk around drooling "everything happens for a reason" because they are passive losers who can't figure out why nothing they do ever turns out right. They take responsibility and they insist and ensure that things are done correctly. Those not on the same page are gotten rid of. This creates confidence and buy-ins among the indians, and soon enough success for the program. This example's in football but it could just as well be in business, in politics, or in (anything).

Quote:
Alabama's Nick Saban has established a total-control, detail-oriented, evaluation-to-graduation system, and now that the Tide has won its second national title in three years, the imitators have arrived
Quote:
Instead of talking about wins and championships, Saban speaks about the Process. In its most basic form, the Process is Saban's term for concentrating on the steps to success rather than worrying about the end result. Instead of thinking about the scoreboard, think about, think about dominating the man on the opposite line of scrimmage. Instead of thinking about a conference title, think about finishing a ninth rep in the weight room. Instead of thinking about graduating, think about writing a great paper for Intro to Psych. Since Saban has won three of the past nine BCS titles..., the phrase has morphed into the mission statement for Saban's program-building philosophy. After watching the Tide coach raise all those crystal footballs, athletic directors and coaches across the country are trying to replicate his philosophy and results.
Quote:
Saban's philosophy is basic, not cool-new or gimmicky. Manager QB, muscly RB. Line that can create holes. QB that can pass to receivers if the defense stacks the box.

...the true success of his system hinges on the selection of players and the way they are trained once they arrive on campus. That is why Saban's system can endure when schemes can't, and it is also why several programs have made big bets that it can be duplicated.

Every players currently recruited by Alabama, Florida and Florida State gets graded using a similar list of criteria. Coaches calculate the grades by scoring each recruit based on three sets of criteria: character/attitude/intelligence, position-specific critical factors and a height/weight/speed chart. On Saban's grading scale the critical factors for a cornerback are:

- can he judge the ball?
- can he play man-to-man?
- can he tackle?

The ideal height for a cornerback is between 6 feet and 6' 2". The ideal weight is heavier than 180 pounds. The ideal speed is less than 4.5 seconds in the 40-yard dash. Saban is quick to point out that these are not firm requirements. For example, Javier Arenas, who was recruited by Mike Shula and inherited by Saban when he first came to Alabama, was only 5' 9", 198 pounds, but he helped the Crimson Tide win the 2009 national title game with two picks in the championship game. Saban says he would have recruited Arenas because he scored high on his critical factors and in the character/attitude/intelligence department.

Those evaluation forms didn't originate with Saban. They came from Don James, who coached Saban at Kent State and made Saban a graduate assistant... James...borrowed the idea from former Colorado coach Eddie Crowder, who forbade his assistants from watching film of recruits and required them to grade based on in-person observation and discussions with high school coaches. At Kent State, James tweaked the criteria to suit his own preferences. "We were looking for guys who could start right away," James says. "We weren't sure we were going to be around for two or three years."

Saban borrowed another key piece of philosophy from James. When James became the head coach at kent State midway through Saban's career as a defensive back, James beefed up the academic support system for his players. "He really was into teh personal, motivational, moral development," Saban says of James. "There was a belief there that who you are mattered in terms of how successful you were going to be or how you played."
that is one reason that we should see whites, not blacks, come to dominate football over time, i add parenthetically - whites are MUCH higher than blacks on brains-character-attitude

Quote:
Having tutors and an academic adviser made staying eligible easier for the players, and it made for fewer academic headaches for James. By the time Saban took over at LSU, many major athletic programs had an academic-assistance unit -- a group of advisers, counselors and tutors that support athletes -- but he considered LSU's inadequate. He soon hired more personnel ande spearheaded the drive for a $15 million, 54,000-square-foot academic center, which opened in 2002. When he arrived at Alabama in '07, Saban also beefed up the academic unit. His most recent project is a $9.1 million weight-room renovation scheduled to open in January.
What if there were an Aryan Institute, with fifteen million in the bank? And it developed courses and curriculum specifically for whites. Gave them, for the first time, a context not based in jewish ideological bullshit like diversity or some other anti-white universalism nor in catholic universalist anti-white religious superstition?

The right process...the right system...the money to make it work...the right people...all of a sudden you might have something.

Quote:
While a defensive coordinator for the Cleveland Browns from 1991 to '94, Saban worked for another critical mentor, Bill Belichick, who not only gave Saban a master course in defensive philosophy, but also taught Saban how to get the most out of his staff and players. Saban took note of the sign Belichick hung in the Browns' complex. It said DO YOUR JOB. Saban loved it because Belichick clearly defined the expectations for every employee in the organization. "Everybody says, 'Be accountable,' but sometimes nobody ever tells you exactly what the expectation is," Saban says. "Bill was good at defining what he expected from everybody, and everybody buying in. Then the team had a chance to flourish because of it." Every year Saban provides everyone who touches the program with a list of responsibilities and expectations, from defensive coordinator Kirby Smart to media-relations director Jeff Purinton. Smart can accept the occasional tongue-lashing because he knows what Saban expects of him. "Is he demanding? Yeah," Smart says. "He requires you to do you job. And I appreciate that."

Though it may come as a shock to many, Saban is more comfortable than most of his colleagues in admitting what he doesn't know. In his quest to train the whole player, he realizes he can't address the mental aspect of the game as well as a sports psychiatrist. When he was head coach of the Miami Dolphins, Saban hired Trevor Moawad, the director of performance at IMG Academy in Bradenton, Fla., to work with his players. He now uses Moawad as a consultant at 'Bama. While Moawad's efforts don't provide empirical data -- a change in attitude can't be quantified like an increase in bench press -- Saban and the players have noticed results. ...

As he has during the past preseason camps, Saban has brought in speakers -- at significant expense -- to highlight various lessons. Saban can preach accountability but the mesage hits harder when former basketball star Chris Herren explains how his drug habit cost him his professional basketball career. Saban can ask his players to stick to their guiding principles, but that won't mean as much as it does coming from former amateur boxer Dewey Bozella, who served 26 years in prison for a murder he didn't commit and who, when offered his freedom in return for an admission of guilt, declined and waited to be exonerated. "Probably one of the toughest things for these coaches to do is convince their administrations that the investment in these other areas is important," Moawad says. "The athletic director says, 'Well, isn't that your job?'"

...

Can Saban's system be replicated at a school that generates about one tenth the revenue that Alabama generates? McElwain, teh former Alabama offensive coordinator, will soon find out, because Colorado State totaled $7.7 million in football revenue in 2010-11.

McElwain contends that some facets of the Process require little money. It doesn't cost him anything to fill out an 18-month master calendar similar to the one Saban keeps at Alabama. It costs Coolorado State a pittance more to print the individual job descriptions for each employee in the football program. And it costs nothing for McElwain to draw a picture of a bus on the grease board in the staff meeting room, on which he can write an employees initials inside the bus anytime that person tries to pass blame for his own failure to someone else. Throw a co-worker under the bus and you ride the bus of shame. "In any business organization, whether you have a bunch of money or not much money, the people are the difference," McElwain says.

...

Is there an approach that can beat Saban's system? The cyclical nature of college football suggests so, but Saban's holistic Process is less susceptible to gimmicks and schematic ingenuity. Saban finds the most talented players with the best mental makeup; trains their mind, body and soul; and then unleashes them.

...

"You have to pay the price for success up front," Saban says. "Everybody wants to do it. Not everybody is willing to do what they have to do to do it."

Last edited by Alex Linder; February 19th, 2014 at 12:32 AM.
 
Old February 19th, 2014 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

How could we apply Saban's ideas to white nationalism...
 
Old February 19th, 2014 #3
Hugh
Holorep survivor
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The wild frontier
Posts: 4,850
Hugh
Default

With difficulty.

US WN needs to learn the concept of inner and outer circles.

Foundations with a publicly acceptable outer circle, and which can accept tax free/tax deductible donations are the start.
Within those, one can then channel support to the inner circle, and work on the real cause.

Written material is essential, but for mass appeal videos are needed. A video of a few minutes, like a news show, can reach thousands. I read somewhere that 10 % of people read newspapers and magazines and books, which seems accurate.
That's why we struggle to reach the masses.

Football is well financed, players well paid and government supported, its leaders can do and say as they please, the players have little say, coaches have immense power.
US WN is the opposite.

American football would become White if it removed the protection its players wear, and they dressed as rugby players do.

Once a few blacks had been thrown onto the ground and scraped along the dirt, blacks would run away.
For Whites on the other hand, it's a rush of note sliding along the ground grinding your opponent into the dirt and putting the boot in as you do so.
The worse it hurts, the more determined you are to stay in the game and hit back.






Most WN starts with trade unions, and the men in them love playing sports, the rougher the better.

Most European nationalism recruits its core from the soccer ultras, hard core sports fans, particularly at international games, when national feelings run high.
It also needs unemployed hooligans as the street fighters, and these are found at soccer events.Most of the young soccer fans are fathers or their sons have fathers in the trade unions, and trades. Poor, hardworking men are the core supporters of nationalism, but they are unable to lead.
When they find an intellectual who can work alongside them, then they are unstoppable.

Whilst the leadership of the EDL in the UK were fakes, their followers were not. Within months, the message had recruited thousands and thousands. The leaders have now destroyed the EDL, but the message lives on, and spreads. In time, it will find genuine organisers.

It will be the same in the US. A focus on the issues and message relevant to Whites in the US today, not other countries decades ago, and WN in the US will take off.

The insistence that WN is only true WN if it worships other parties from other countries in other times is a major factor in its irrelevance for most Whites, especially poor ones, who make up the bulk of WN, as they have the most to win from government change.

If US WN focused more on mass appeal via sports, and better, more normal music, instead of mostly untalented screaming, and on the issues unemployed Whites face, it would go far.
It's mostly an intellectual exercise at present, necessary in the early stages.

Unplanned action, without forethought, means nothing.
Actions planned within wider strategy make changes happen.

__________________
Secede. Control taxbases/municipalities. Use boycotts, divestment, sanctions, strikes.
http://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/...d-Jan-2015.pdf
https://canvasopedia.org/wp-content/...Points-web.pdf

Last edited by Hugh; February 19th, 2014 at 03:21 PM.
 
Old February 19th, 2014 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Frank Carroll, ice skater coach

http://deadspin.com/the-coach-who-do...s-i-1525870117

"There's a difference between being a coach and being a teacher," Carroll told me in December. "Teaching involves being able to on-pass knowledge about how to do a skill; how to teach someone to use their body to do a jump, or use their feet to create speed, or how to make a spin go faster. A coach is somebody who can prepare people for competition and give them a philosophy about how to be champions, how to deal with the disappointments and the triumphs, how to budget their time. And a coach teaches them the philosophy of being a competitor."

This involves a little roleplaying. From the first day Carroll begins working with a skater, he emphasizes the importance of carrying oneself like a champion. That's how WN should act.

"I tell the student to pretend I am a very mean, cranky, nasty judge, and that I want to see them go on the ice and warm up as they would at a competition. Not their jumping, not their spinning, but their stroking and skating," he said, referring to the brief group warm-up sessions skaters are allowed before taking the ice in competition. "I tell them, 'I want you to convince me, by the way you step on the ice and the way you move around, that you're the very best skater in this group.' Then I'll let them loose, and I'll see what their idea of impressing people is."

In this world, you get taken as seriously as you take yourself, generally. As has been said, you teach other people how to treat you by what you allow. WN has allowed too much. It has been too tolerant. This is one reason it has not gained respect. It's not the main reason - that would be enemy suppression/attacks, which are continual - see the enemy equating;mixing National Socialism with Satanism and pedophilia in the new popular HBO show "True Detective" - but it is a minor one.

Be a serious man, or woman. If white nationalism is something more than entertainment, then what does that imply on one's part? How does it change how one lives and behaves?

Last edited by Alex Linder; February 19th, 2014 at 04:57 PM.
 
Old February 19th, 2014 #5
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
With difficulty.
Not at all. Of course, one needs a vehicle to start. But after that, you need complete control of details through the entire process. Everything thought out. WN remains mired, with one foot in the yee-ha-ism of the Old South, and the other foot stuck tight in the scared-shitless pile of money-mulcting conservatism.

Quote:
US WN needs to learn the concept of inner and outer circles.

Foundations with a publicly acceptable outer circle, and which can accept tax free/tax deductible donations are the start. Within those, one can then channel support to the inner circle, and work on the real cause.
Except government approval = government control. (Even assuming you can get 501 status for a racial foundation - Pierce could not.) They can shut a 501c3 down at any time by claiming it's funding terrorism. In practice, the WN that go this route don't start or stay radical, they go bouregois conservative, because it's safe and it's far more lucrative. Look at Vdare, for example. It's radicalism consists in funding Richard Meh-Spencer reading some paper proving some point known 100 years ago to 60-year-old men in some rented hall. That doesn't lead anywhere. 501c3 is tantamount to cooption. The only use for a 501c3 would be to perform genuinely and purely educational missions, such as developing an Aryan School. Something indirectly political, akin to the Catholic law school or the homeschooling college with a evangelical-christian bent.

Quote:
Written material is essential, but for mass appeal videos are needed. A video of a few minutes, like a news show, can reach thousands. I read somewhere that 10 % of people read newspapers and magazines and books, which seems accurate.
Yeah, but those are the top ten percent, and they're worth a large multiple of the rest.

No video will be truly "mass" unless it goes out over cable tv, unblocked. Which is tantamount to having taken power already. Some youtube videos no matter how popular aren't on that level, although that is one good distribution. Just don't overrate its effect.

Quote:
That's why we struggle to reach the masses.
We struggle to reach the masses because we don't control the mass media, and can't even buy space in them most times. In the early days of VNN, we tried to buy a space ad in a leftist publication, The Nation, which advertises it's free-speech policy. They fedexed me back a refusal along with the uncanceled check. That's one shitty, unread near-communist publication.

The masses follow the strong lead, they don't need to be persuaded the white cause is right, they already marry white and move white. And mostly even live white. But it's not ideological tot hem, as it is to us. It needs to be made ideological through effective leadership, which it is the business of our enemy to prevent forming, and he has been good at that so far. One of his cleverest strategies is to create imitation white leaders who claim the 'west is committing suicide,' as opposed to be murdered, or that 'whites are doing it to themselves,' rather than having it done to them.

Quote:
Football is well financed, players well paid and government supported, its leaders can do and say as they please, the players have little say, coaches have immense power. US WN is the opposite.
No kidding. The point is, WN needs money and proper technical support, just as a successful football team does. Although this is not its most important need, as I have always maintained. The money follows the bravery or success.

Quote:
Most WN starts with trade unions, and the men in them love playing sports, the rougher the better.

Most European nationalism recruits its core from the soccer ultras, hard core sports fans, particularly at international games, when national feelings run high.
Europe is different from America, in this regard. We have an entirely different tradition, with both negative and some positive aspects.

The key is to focus on what-who is preventing our kind from organizing and getting what it wants. Organizing has never been a difficulty for any white people. Therefore, it is some external force preventing us from doing it today. We know what that force is. Pretending it doesn't exist, as many so-called WN do, doesn't make that power go away or reduce the need to confront it head on.

Quote:
Whilst the leadership of the EDL in the UK were fakes, their followers were not. Within months, the message had recruited thousands and thousands. The leaders have now destroyed the EDL, but the message lives on, and spreads. In time, it will find genuine organisers.
As very often, you're missing the point. The state backed EDL - the media supported it. Purely because it was pushing a pro-jew line. That you don't acknowledge that throws your motives into question. Jews let muslims into the UK. Then they prop up a fake-opposition anti-muslim party.

Quote:
It will be the same in the US. A focus on the issues and message relevant to Whites in the US today, not other countries decades ago, and WN in the US will take off.
Then why hasn't it? Because the system combines as one to crush anyone speaking honestly to real, felt white needs. You're just another guy claiming the failure is mechanical when it's not. It's systemic. The system created in the 60s exists to suppress white identity so that jews and blacks can feed off white money and other assets.

Quote:
The insistence that WN is only true WN if it worships other parties from other countries in other times is a major factor in its irrelevance for most Whites, especially poor ones, who make up the bulk of WN, as they have the most to win from government change.
As you know, you're employing a strawman argument, which, as you know, is a logical fallacy. What you're trying to distract attention from is the fact that other men in other countries faced a problem remarkably similar to our own - and solved it. We would be fools not to pay attention to their words. The fact their writings from nearly 100 years ago are more apposite to our predicament today than the writings of anyone on the right is hair-raisingly amazing and suggestive. Those men you Little English bigots hate were on to something.

Quote:
If US WN focused more on mass appeal via sports, and better, more normal music, instead of mostly untalented screaming, and on the issues unemployed Whites face, it would go far.
American sports aren't politicized as they are in Europe. They're a consumer spectacle, not an ersatz nationalism, except in the overall sense.

Quote:
It's mostly an intellectual exercise at present, necessary in the early stages.
Whites have been organized repeatedly in the 20th century, and all their organizations were smashed by the enemy - the jew behind the system and the state. That's the fact of the matter. That is the understanding WN must have going in, rather than pretending our cause is treated like any other group. Just look at what is going on in Greece for an example of supposedly neutral democratic machinery in operation.

Quote:
Unplanned action, without forethought, means nothing.
Actions planned within wider strategy make changes happen.
That's true. And I've written the general plan. Even without a party, we can change our culture - which is why I post all this sports strategy stuff, because changing a culture is a large necessity within WN. We need to separate and elevate our cause, and we do this not by chumming around with conservatives, as MacDonald and James Edwards do, but by attacking them. Our cause must be a jealous cause. As the wise Patrick Buchanan said, rising movement are intolerant. WN are generally too liberal and squishy for anyone to take seriously. Who likes who is a matter for 12-year-old girls, not grown men, but I despair of making white nationalists understand this.
 
Old February 19th, 2014 #6
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

"If you see your coach getting emotionally worked up, it just gives his students the opportunity to be the same way," said Mauro Bruni, one of Carroll's former skaters. "He'll never get wrapped up in the emotion. He never raises his voice. He's very businesslike on the ice, and I found that different from other coaches I'd worked with in the past. He's calm, straight to the point. There's no bullshit."

"If my eyes would start to well up because I was having a bad day, he'd say, 'I don't want to see any tears today,'" recalled Fratianne. "I never crossed Frank or pushed back against Frank; if I ever got angry, it was mostly at myself."

"I don't want to hear, you're emotionally upset. I don't want to hear, this didn't go right. I don't want whining. I want training," Carroll said. "The only way to have success is through preparation and, yes, I understand you're nervous, but I don't care. Neither do the judges care. No one cares. What they want to see you do is get through this program from the start to the finish very, very well."
 
Old February 19th, 2014 #7
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Carroll sounds like famous football coach Bill Parcells: "Don't tell me about the labor pains, show me the baby."
 
Old February 19th, 2014 #8
Sam Emerson
Diversity = White Genocide
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
Sam Emerson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
How could we apply Saban's ideas to white nationalism...
We need a plan to defend ourselves from enemy action and eventually to attack. Not with guns, with the same kind of weapons the enemy uses on us, media weapons.

Most of what the enemy (Jews and anti-white whites) does depends on public opinion and that is shaped by the media. When a white nationalist needs help or is in trouble he can count on the police, courts, juries, academics, businesses, and the man on the street to be biased against him. That bias is constantly reinforced by the controlled media.

To fight back white nationalists need to produce their own media and begin shaping public opinion. This is a long term plan, though maybe not as long term as we'd expect. The Jews were fighting an uphill battle turning whites against themselves. Our message is much easier to sell if we can reach whites with it.

To accomplish this whites have to control their own media from production to distribution. Behind the scenes we need writers, camera men, directors, lighting and sound technicians. In front of the cameras we need spokesmen and spokeswomen, pundits and experts, comedians, talk show hosts and eventually actors and actresses for pro-white scripted programming. Way behind the scenes we need administrators and programmers to keep the video and audio streaming servers online.

The Fox Network programs just nineteen hours a week. They have distribution that we never will (until we win) with broadcast stations in every big market. But our media can reach most whites in the US with internet streaming. Nineteen hours of programming every week can be achieved by starting with one day and expanding over time. That's how Fox did it.

Applying Saban's ideas to this recruiting the right people and holding them to high standards is the key. Everyone involved above an intern must be a loyal, honest, intelligent, hard working white man or woman. And even interns have to behave themselves.

Quality television (in the technical sense) doesn't happen by chance. Influential programming requires even more planning and craftsmanship. This doesn't require the army of people employed in Hollywood film production or big four network news broadcast, but it does require the essential technical personnel and propaganda writers to know what they're doing.

One element of quality television is the man or woman in front of the camera. Are they well dressed? Are they the correct type of person for their intended role? Are they playing the part of a Jay Leno, Dan Rather, Rush Limbaugh or Angelina Jolie? Are they dressed appropriately for that role?

You can be sure that when you watch a network newscast, talk show or news magazine program all of these things have been carefully considered, and if they've been overlooked (in the case of elderly, unattractive Jewish reporters who won't retire, yes, 60 Minutes, I'm looking at you) the production people are well aware of the problem.

Another element of quality television is basic, sound and vision. Is the sound clear? Is there background noise? Is it mixed so you can easily hear and understand everyone? Is the image in focus? Are camera movements fluid? Is the editing smooth, always showing what needs to be seen and hiding what needs to be hidden? Are flesh tones natural? Does the set's color scheme clash with the performers wardrobe? Does some of this seem petty, like something a real he-man shouldn't concern himself with? The Jews don't think so. They were meticulous in crafting the media weapons that have brought us to the brink of extinction.

Pay attention to how they did it. Thanks to the media equivalent of Moore's Law now we can do it too.
 
Old February 20th, 2014 #9
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Emerson View Post
We need a plan to defend ourselves from enemy action and eventually to attack. Not with guns, with the same kind of weapons the enemy uses on us, media weapons.

Most of what the enemy (Jews and anti-white whites) does depends on public opinion and that is shaped by the media. When a white nationalist needs help or is in trouble he can count on the police, courts, juries, academics, businesses, and the man on the street to be biased against him. That bias is constantly reinforced by the controlled media.

To fight back white nationalists need to produce their own media and begin shaping public opinion. This is a long term plan, though maybe not as long term as we'd expect. The Jews were fighting an uphill battle turning whites against themselves. Our message is much easier to sell if we can reach whites with it.
Jews control tv. They and their government are not going to allow unimpeded white racial access to FCC-regulated airwaves.

The best we can do for now is use the internet. This is what Golden Dawn does in Greece. It's good enough to get them 20% of the vote, by some polls. They complain daily, though, about extreme hatred toward and bias against their party in the medai. Even when they're an established, successful party with at least ten percent of the nation behind them, they are either treated unfairly in or frozen out of the televised media.

Quote:
To accomplish this whites have to control their own media from production to distribution. Behind the scenes we need writers, camera men, directors, lighting and sound technicians. In front of the cameras we need spokesmen and spokeswomen, pundits and experts, comedians, talk show hosts and eventually actors and actresses for pro-white scripted programming. Way behind the scenes we need administrators and programmers to keep the video and audio streaming servers online.
Where is this talent going to come from? It's certainly not in evidence at the moment. The people with the professional-level talent needed to begin thinking about competing with the jews almost always choose to go the conservative route. This is a pereniall problem for a truly radical cause like white nationalism - the stuff that seems sort of like it that's safe will exert a suck-back on it. People who know WN is the right way to go nevertheless for safety/money will revert to conservatism.

It's fine to say we should control distribution, but that's only possible on the internet. There's not even any conceivable way to get into cable tv, and that's where the big numbers are.

Quote:
The Fox Network programs just nineteen hours a week. They have distribution that we never will (until we win) with broadcast stations in every big market. But our media can reach most whites in the US with internet streaming. Nineteen hours of programming every week can be achieved by starting with one day and expanding over time. That's how Fox did it.
That might be possible. It can't be overemphasized how important DAILINESS is. THAT is what builds an audience - doing something every single day. That was how the original VNN built up - daily satire.

The circumstances in my view dictate that a ju-jitsu approach is best. We use the opponent's weight against him. He has his agenda, but we can take his stories - the stuff most people are talking about, because it's what they see - and give them our spin. And then add side dishes that are purely our own stuff.

What's effective with smart, driven people is the jew Jon Stewart approach at COMEDY Central - mocking. White nationalists are perfectly position to do that, given what the mainstream controlled media are hiding. But do we have the talent and the perseverance, let alone the funding?

Quote:
Applying Saban's ideas to this recruiting the right people and holding them to high standards is the key. Everyone involved above an intern must be a loyal, honest, intelligent, hard working white man or woman. And even interns have to behave themselves.
We need loyalty and professionalism. Vetting and, yes, micromanagement are necessary because of the enemy and his actions. Essentially, WN must rise "up from Southernism." We require a combination of fanaticism, loyalty and technical competence. That's a tall order. Anything less won't work.

Quote:
Quality television (in the technical sense) doesn't happen by chance. Influential programming requires even more planning and craftsmanship. This doesn't require the army of people employed in Hollywood film production or big four network news broadcast, but it does require the essential technical personnel and propaganda writers to know what they're doing.

One element of quality television is the man or woman in front of the camera. Are they well dressed? Are they the correct type of person for their intended role? Are they playing the part of a Jay Leno, Dan Rather, Rush Limbaugh or Angelina Jolie? Are they dressed appropriately for that role?

You can be sure that when you watch a network newscast, talk show or news magazine program all of these things have been carefully considered, and if they've been overlooked (in the case of elderly, unattractive Jewish reporters who won't retire, yes, 60 Minutes, I'm looking at you) the production people are well aware of the problem.

Another element of quality television is basic, sound and vision. Is the sound clear? Is there background noise? Is it mixed so you can easily hear and understand everyone? Is the image in focus? Are camera movements fluid? Is the editing smooth, always showing what needs to be seen and hiding what needs to be hidden? Are flesh tones natural? Does the set's color scheme clash with the performers wardrobe? Does some of this seem petty, like something a real he-man shouldn't concern himself with? The Jews don't think so. They were meticulous in crafting the media weapons that have brought us to the brink of extinction.

Pay attention to how they did it. Thanks to the media equivalent of Moore's Law now we can do it too.
A few competent loyal people could do something that might catch on in a big way. Finding and funding those people is a challenge. I also question the need for a straight broadcast in light of the huge success of the Daily Show at Comedy Central. We need a revolution, and that means young people with energy even more than old people with money.
 
Old February 21st, 2014 #10
Sam Emerson
Diversity = White Genocide
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
Sam Emerson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Jews control tv. They and their government are not going to allow unimpeded white racial access to FCC-regulated airwaves.

The best we can do for now is use the internet. This is what Golden Dawn does in Greece. It's good enough to get them 20% of the vote, by some polls. They complain daily, though, about extreme hatred toward and bias against their party in the medai. Even when they're an established, successful party with at least ten percent of the nation behind them, they are either treated unfairly in or frozen out of the televised media.
No disagreement. The internet is the only way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Where is this talent going to come from? It's certainly not in evidence at the moment. The people with the professional-level talent needed to begin thinking about competing with the jews almost always choose to go the conservative route. This is a pereniall problem for a truly radical cause like white nationalism - the stuff that seems sort of like it that's safe will exert a suck-back on it. People who know WN is the right way to go nevertheless for safety/money will revert to conservatism.
If it had financial backing there are thousands of unemployed technicians, announcers and actors who'd do it. They would be grade B talent, people unable to find work in the industry, but they'd be professional. There are far more qualified people seeking employment than there are jobs in television. When he started CNN Ted Turner offered basic pay and benefits for news readers and he was able to compete with the big networks. It turned out that the difference between Dan Rather and a $40,000 a year news reader was not as much as you might have predicted based on their relative pay.

But that would take serious financial backing, you'd have to offer full time employment and pay the going rate, adjusted for the regional cost of living.

You'd have to keep some alternate candidates for all the key positions waiting in the wings (maybe employing them in a lesser capacity) for the inevitable walkouts when the Jews went after the technical staff. Ideally you'd have white nationalists in every technical position, but even they might capitulate under pressure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
It's fine to say we should control distribution, but that's only possible on the internet. There's not even any conceivable way to get into cable tv, and that's where the big numbers are.
It's a lot easier to get big numbers on cable television. Cable channels (many owned by the same conglomerates) cross promote to draw in more viewers and gain more when channel surfers stumble upon their programming, assuming they have anything that can hook them. You can get big numbers on the internet but it's pay per view on the video streaming side, and it's harder to reach whites who aren't looking for our content. On the other hand the political commentary programs we'd like to displace don't have a hundred million viewers, so it can be done online without breaking the bank.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
That might be possible. It can't be overemphasized how important DAILINESS is. THAT is what builds an audience - doing something every single day. That was how the original VNN built up - daily satire.

The circumstances in my view dictate that a ju-jitsu approach is best. We use the opponent's weight against him. He has his agenda, but we can take his stories - the stuff most people are talking about, because it's what they see - and give them our spin. And then add side dishes that are purely our own stuff.

What's effective with smart, driven people is the jew Jon Stewart approach at COMEDY Central - mocking. White nationalists are perfectly position to do that, given what the mainstream controlled media are hiding. But do we have the talent and the perseverance, let alone the funding?
Yes, daily reinforcement. On time, every day without fail. The networks know this. That's why they show the same programs five days a week at the same time, soap operas have been using that template for over sixty years, and syndicated reruns of popular shows (The Honeymooners, Gilligan's Island) for over fifty years.

You're right, a white nationalist comedy/commentary show along the lines of Jon Stewart's is exactly what we need. Much better than white nationalist weather reports. If the right host can be found.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
We need loyalty and professionalism. Vetting and, yes, micromanagement are necessary because of the enemy and his actions. Essentially, WN must rise "up from Southernism." We require a combination of fanaticism, loyalty and technical competence. That's a tall order. Anything less won't work.
With financial backing there would be a line of applicants around the block. That line would thin out once everyone knew that it was a white nationalist production, but people really want to be involved in the media, even when it's barely the media. Edward D. Wood never had any trouble finding actors. Needless to say we want to do better than than that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
A few competent loyal people could do something that might catch on in a big way. Finding and funding those people is a challenge. I also question the need for a straight broadcast in light of the huge success of the Daily Show at Comedy Central. We need a revolution, and that means young people with energy even more than old people with money.
It's easier to find the talent for a straight broadcast, no doubt a Daily Show approach is better if you can find someone funny enough to carry it.
 
Old February 27th, 2014 #11
Hugh
Holorep survivor
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The wild frontier
Posts: 4,850
Hugh
Default

Quote:
Of course, one needs a vehicle to start. But after that, you need complete control of details through the entire process. Everything thought out. WN remains mired, with one foot in the yee-ha-ism of the Old South, and the other foot stuck tight in the scared-shitless pile of money-mulcting conservatism.
Jews are organised crime syndicates. These get taken down by specialists.

The Jews shabbos goy frontmen running the US politically and its corporations since WW 2 have been WW 2 and Vietnam vets, who have to justify WW 2 and Vietnam, Serbia etc by opposing nationalism, but their days in power are almost over as they are at retirement age.
Also, the USSR and Eastern Europe, as well as their many client states, had immense resources to pour into the US and Western Europe to back up the Jews, that's gone.

Quote:
Even assuming you can get 501 status for a racial foundation - Pierce could not.

The point is, WN needs money and proper technical support, just as a successful football team does. Although this is not its most important need, as I have always maintained. The money follows the bravery or success.
It needs local meeting places. I've been involved in mainstream politics for many years, groups meet at tea and coffee shops and restaurants most of the time, not at rallies or events.

It also needs resources. My point is don't try to create foundations identifiable for such purposes.

Call them foundations for sports development, health, civil rights, better governance, anti-abortion, better city services, workers rights, create many, with single purposes, that don't ripple the surface, and that the public will buy into, and use them for such purposes, which benefit Whites.
The inner agenda is that they provide offices, furniture, computers, and resources and salaries etc. that can then or later be used for other purposes as well.
That's what most NGO's do, and how political parties run locally, people use their work and NGO and own resources most of the time.
The 80/20 rule always applies.

The 80 percent that accomplishes 20 percent of the real goal is what the public sees
The 20 percent that accomplishes 80 percent of the real goal, is unseen.
Many NGO's and parties and governments fail because their members are incompetent, and incompetence and inexperience in running groups and activities is a major reason WN fails as well.

Quote:
We struggle to reach the masses because we don't control the mass media, and can't even buy space in them most times.
The masses are irrelevant. They are sheep.
Start simple, like Pierce did, with a monthly/weekly article, then develop that later into videos as is being done with Pierces work on Youtube.
The former National Alliance members have had no leadership or direction. They are all there, waiting and wishing someone would take the lead.
You can provide that.

Quote:
The key is to focus on what-who is preventing our kind from organizing and getting what it wants. . Pretending it doesn't exist, as many so-called WN do, doesn't make that power go away or reduce the need to confront it head on.
All the world's best armies focus on flanking or rear attacks, on covert operations at first. When others see the enemy is weak,k they also close in and begin attacking. The US military 10 years ago was without compare. Today it can't handle shepherds. The police are afraid, look how many they call in for the smallest matters. Look at how many there are, but how few arrests they make relative to numbers, close to a million police and other agencies, but only 12 million arrests a year between them. That's an average of 12 per year per member. yet the justice system can't manage with that performance level

Quote:
You're just another guy claiming the failure is mechanical when it's not. It's systemic. The system created in the 60s exists to suppress white identity so that jews and blacks can feed off white money and other assets.

As you know, you're employing a strawman argument, which, as you know, is a logical fallacy. What you're trying to distract attention from is the fact that other men in other countries faced a problem remarkably similar to our own - and solved it. We would be fools not to pay attention to their words. The fact their writings from nearly 100 years ago are more apposite to our predicament today than the writings of anyone on the right is hair-raisingly amazing and suggestive.

Look to the US founding fathers, and the federalist papers, who took on the greatest empire in history, broke free and then created the freest, most developed, richest and most powerful empire ever. They had committees of correspondence, we have websites, blogs, youtube etc.
A government falls when the police will not back it, as we saw across the USSR, and have just seen in Ukraine.
The military are irrelevant politically inside a country.
Its always the police and intelligence agencies who keep the government in place.
Armies can put their own into power, but can only keep them there by becoming the police.
The intelligence capabilities and kill ratios of police and their paramilitary groups dwarf those of the military.

Look to the founders of the state you live in.
Who even knows the names of the founders of the various states?
The US states are each countries, held together in an empire.

Power starts with paradigms and perceptions.

When the paradigm that the US is a single country is broken, and people realise they already live in dozens of countries held inside an empire, and that they don't need to bear the cost of the failed countries in the US, then things will change.
When the WN movement begins to refer to and think of the states as countries, that paradigm will begin to take hold.
Maybe we should start the trend here.

Countries I've lived in have withstood military style attacks for decades unharmed, but fallen within months or a couple years when the attacks turned to focus on their economy.
The USSR fell as Russia ran out of money to maintain internal control, and its member states realised that by just not paying their contributions to Russia, they could bring it all down, and keep their money for themselves.
The federales are the same.
As more US countries collapse due to non-Whites and Jews, the federales have to take more and more money from solvent countries to give to them. As solvent countries see themselves going bankrupt to finance failed countries like California , they will resent it. People only rise when they are hungry and have no money, then like cattle they mill around making noise and breaking things till someone leads them, then they all stampede together over all obstacles.

Quote:
Those men you Little English bigots hate were on to something.
They were often right, but that didn't stop them being killed. They were romantics, and fought fair, a fatal error when fighting professional killers.

The English have not ruled England for over a 1000 years.
First conquered and ruled by Viking descended Normans since 1066, then ruled by Dutch and German kings, Queen Elizabeth is a descendant of William the Conqueror, to this day.
For over a 1000 years, the English have been virtual slaves, robbed by kings and aristocracies, forced into their mines and factories, massacred when trying to break free, transported to Australia and other colonies as slaves in chains, pressganged into the navies, forced into the fyrd and then armies under pain of death. Most European violence is pent up frustration from the sheer misery of life in Europe under its rulers. Why do you think so many left for the colonies, preferring to start life over with nothing in often barbarous lands, just to get away?

Europe's wars have been fought by European dynasties, not countries or peoples.
Europe's countries were created out of their lands, and those of their supporters in the various aristocracies, forcing together hundreds of small nations into the "countries" we see today.
The people had no say.

Both world wars against Germany were declared and fought by the German monarchs who rule Britain to this day.
Their House is centred in Germany to this day at Coburg.
http://www.sachsen-coburg-gotha.de/en/

German monarchs of Britain created and ruled the greatest Empire on earth for 300 years, and were the driving force behind founding the US colonies in the first place.

The US backed by France fought its war of Independence and of 1812 against the German King George III of Britain who could barely speak English, and who was in a global war with 5 European countries at the time.
Britain made more money from it's sugar plantations in the Caribbean than all of the US, that's why it sent such a small force, compared to the immense forces it sent to fight the other European countries.

Hitler could not grasp the British empire was the greatest German ruled Empire in history.

When Wilhelm of Prussia then Hitler confiscated those monarchs own personal lands, and attacked their cousins who ruled various European countries, then Britain's German monarchs declared war on Prussia and NS Germany.

George V who waged WW 1 and George VI who waged WW 2, s is Queen Elizabeth, are of the house of Saxe Coburg Gotha.

George V was married to Mary of Teck, neither appreciated their lands being taken by upstart Prussian kinglets, nor their cousins kingdom in Belgium being attacked.
Hitler confiscated the lands of George VI in Germany, and allied with the USSR, who had killed the Tsarina of Russia, George's first cousin.

George V, Kaiser Wilhelm 2 and Tsarina Alexandra were first cousins, and related to the kings of Denmark, Greece, Norway, Romania, Spain.
Wilhelm and Hitler appeared to think Britain's monarch's would sit back and do nothing as their lands were confiscated, and family attacked.

Quote:
Whites have been organized repeatedly in the 20th century, and all their organizations were smashed by the enemy - the jew behind the system and the state. That's the fact of the matter. That is the understanding WN must have going in, rather than pretending our cause is treated like any other group. Just look at what is going on in Greece for an example of supposedly neutral democratic machinery in operation.
The Jews peaked in the 1980's.
They had absolute power in the USSR and Eastern Europe. No longer.
The Jews could use the US military to crush any other power on earth. No longer.
Empires only last as long as they expand and can destroy their enemies, and provide plunder for their troops.
When they can't, those troops turn on them and rip them apart, their enemies pour in looking for vengeance.

Prince Phillip is actually Phillipos, prince of Greece and Denmark, born on Corfu.
His uncle was King Constantine of Greece. Phillip and his family were expelled from Greece when the King was overthrown.
Maybe he wants Greece back.
US politics is conducted with flags and bands and armies on the battlefield.
British politics is conducted with bribes, down at the Club.

There is a big difference today. Europe's monarchs and aristocracy whilst the remainder are immensely wealthy and powerful, mostly died out in WW1, the balance in and after WW 2.The USSR no longer exists, the British empire is shrunken and weak, the US is no longer a superpower except militarily, but even there it has gone bankrupt.
There are no superpowers left capable of projecting their power across the world sustainably, there is an immense gap and vaccuum in the world's power structures.
I expect the US to follow a similar route to the USSR and Eastern Europe, mostly just fall apart, with some horrific violence and mini wars in the majority non-white areas and bordering states, but mostly peaceful.
Also, with modern technology and science the various countries in the US are self sufficient in most areas in need.

Quote:
That's true. And I've written the general plan. Even without a party, we can change our culture - which is why I post all this sports strategy stuff, because changing a culture is a large necessity within WN. We need to separate and elevate our cause, and we do this not by chumming around with conservatives, as MacDonald and James Edwards do, but by attacking them. Our cause must be a jealous cause. As the wise Patrick Buchanan said, rising movement are intolerant. WN are generally too liberal and squishy for anyone to take seriously. Who likes who is a matter for 12-year-old girls, not grown men, but I despair of making white nationalists understand this.
As the Swedes say, many little streams make a river.
Streams are created out of little raindrops, post by post, action by action
In Ukraine, we've just seen the police turn their backs on the government, and just by their going home, as in the USSR, the government of the day fled.

The key is to build an opposition a broad front, as many different groups as possible, and then a small core, a culture stratum or thin layer as Yockey spoke of.

Quote:
As very often, you're missing the point. The state backed EDL - the media supported it. Purely because it was pushing a pro-jew line. That you don't acknowledge that throws your motives into question.
Maybe you missed this part
Whilst the leadership of the EDL in the UK were fakes,
The leaders have now destroyed the EDL

What I've said about the EDL since 2010 on the UK forum, which applies just as well to other groups.

Quote:

http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1...&postcount=611

What we have here is a false flag operation, run by highly intelligent, experienced and trained people with a military or police background, to control the opposition, and designed to smoke out extremists, or if they can't find any, create them, so as to discredit the movement.
The structure of natural organisations formed from the ground up is centred around family and friends who make natural cells, and don't take instructions. This type of structure is very hard to roll up or infiltrate.

The way this organisation has been structured is clearly done using a formally planed structure with neat little boxes that can be rolled up in hours if need be.

They will no doubt have legislation in place they want to put through, and will use this organisation to build up public support of that legislation, then stage a few hollywood style extremist events, and then put that legislation through.

All political power is derived from the ability to put through or influence legislation, policies and budgets.
Any group or activity that wants political change but is not focused upon achieving political power is either run by people who don't know what they are doing, or else who know very well what they are doing, and are deliberately trying to neutralise the group/activity and prevent them gaining any political power.

http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1...&postcount=700

Jews own the government, control the budget, and set policy for Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Commonwealth, and most EU policies.

British legislation and taxation is set by Jews sitting in Brussels, who bring in several thousand immigrants a day, and you protest against Muslim general dealers.

How many English get killed robbed and raped by Blacks?
What is the EDL's approach to Blacks?
To love them.

Is the EDL stated to be a Christian, pro Church of England/Anglican organisation, since that is England's national religion?

Or is the EDL a non-religious, anti-racist, curiously not anti communist, secular EDL defending Israel?

You are being conned.

EDL accomplishments to date consist of marching up and down, dancing, and waving cloths.


Marches mean nothing. Any soccer club can put out as many or more.

How can such a slick, smooth, well financed operation appear overnight, with more branches and supporters than most political parties, yet mysteriously have no political power, and make no political changes?
Pro Israel, anti racist, pro gay rights, filled with homosexuals, blacks, Arabs, slick uniforms, badges, and marketing, and smiling Jews everywhere, helping.

How many MPs do you have?
How many councillors?
How many EU parliamentary groups do you belong to?
How many nationalist organisations with actual real political power across Europe are you in alliance with?
What are you doing about regaining Britains sovereignty?

Building planning regulations, bylaws, panels, commissions, boards, control of government means everything.

What percentage of your time is spent on policies, regulations, and bylaws, which matter?
What shadow positions in local and national government are you busy with?

You are being diverted from political power, which lies in controlling parties, taxbases, the civil service, laws, bylaws, courts, police, into meaningless activities.

Put down your beers and stupid cloths, go and study finance, law, town and urban planning and government administration, become political party and constituency chairs, councillors and MPs, and gain control of government, like adults



Yep.

An organised, planned, controlled march of 10 000 would require an organising group of in the region of 250 to 500 people, in just that one area.
How much effort, time and money was spent on the Christian/Newsom rally, for how many people?

One can expect a cost of in the area of between 50 to 100 zogbucks per local person, depending on transport, catering, phone calls etc.

So the EDL have an organisational capacity of probably 500 people, and are spending between 100 000 to a million zogbucks, just for one march.

Also note how few community groups are involved.
Usually in any march, calls are made to every cause and group that exists, especially trade unions etc and they all troop along to get media exposure for their cause.

Community marches contain especially animal rights activists, pro and anti abortion groups, groups saving the spotted swallow, anti capitalists, anti communists, people asking for higher pensions etc, and the ones who carry the flags are usually hippy types, and in reality often lose them, tear them, break the pole etc.
There are also some who wander off route and get lost, after an hour or two, most need the toilet, and that's when the march usually ends.
Young men usually take their girlfriends along so they can go to the pub, get drunk and bang like bunnies afterwards.
Note how few women there are in the EDL marches, yet the majority of activists are usually women.

Most protestors also wear very old clothes, because they can't afford to get their nice clothes dirty for work the next day. Look at the nice clean new clothes of the EDL leaders, smart, clean untorn flags.

The EDL march would accomplish absolutely nothing, which is why its being held, and why the state is pretending to be so nervous.

This is the same state that happily went to war in Serbia, Afghanistan and Iraq, bombing, burning, massacring, starving, and torturing, now pretending to be afraid of cloth wavers, that it has itself organised.

Those the state builds up in the media as opponents, are never the opponents, they are the opposite.
That's why the state builds them up, so their opponents are drawn into laughable activities.

Had those same 10 000 simply joined their local conservative and labour branches, and voted each other in as branch and constituency chairs, they would have put several MPs into parliament, as well as gained control of the entire municipality, of all councillors within that municipality, of all political branches and hundreds of millions of zogbucks in budget.
They would then have been in charge of all local government services, police, bylaw enforcement etc. and made a difference.

Compare that, to marching up and down the street waving cloths, then going to the pub afterwards, to get drunk.

Bearing in mind that these are supposed to be tradesmen, clerks, shop assistants etc. look at the front of the march.

Look at the plump, comfortable, healthy middle class faces, age and tip top physical condition of the protest leaders, and the spotless condition and quality of the flag. Most peaceful protestors are usually middle aged, usually half are women and children, and they bring umbrellas.

By the horizontal flag, you will see two Arabs, and two military or police types. Special branch are the political police, and usually wear scarves.
The army prefer wearing balaclavas.

Behind them are two with military and one with a police haircut, and about every five to 10 people, is another police or military haircut.
One is even wearing his nice new army jersey.
Observe the one to the right at the back of the crowd, talking into his sleeve mike.

Behind them holding an English flag is another Middle Easterner.

The other in the team at the front, who will throw the bottles, carefully so that they miss, do no damage and roll down the street, wears gloves.

That's just in one tiny area.

Whilst they create fake mayhem, they will carefully monitor real civilians who copy them, and see that those get arrested afterwards.

The scarves are there both to hide their identities so they are not compromised for future operations elsewhere, and to protect themselves against the tear gas etc.

Their role like that of the police controlled "Black Bloc" in European demonstrations against globalism, is to create the appearance of leading the resistance, to prevent real resistance being conducted.

In actual clashes, there are usually real molotov cocktails used filled with gasoline and soapflakes, to make the flames stick to the polices clothes and boots, and create walls of flame, or if there's a shield wall, thrown up in the air so they fall vertically onto the heads of the police behind the shields, or against the polices feet, not harmlessly against the shields.

There are flares, small cans of insect repellant or aerosol paint to spray just below the polices faceguards or into the faces of police dogs, knuckledusters, spikes, and darts.
Gasoline soaked rags etc get thrown into dustbins and down kerb inlets along the route, to be ignited later.
Fires are set behind the police in abandoned buildings etc, to draw police attention and numbers away from the crowd in front.

Real clashes occur in semi industrial areas, near major transit routes, so that groups of police can be sucked out into warehouses etc and ambushed, and attackers can flee.
Marches also occur an hour or two before dark, to aid escape.

None of these have occurred in the EDL "clashes".

The first stop for any political group that really wants to clash with the police, is the local ultras and organised soccer fans, who do it for fun

This is what civil disturbances by cheeky local lads looks like, when they're having a bit of fun after a soccer match. These are classed as minor.


Top 5 Hooligans - YouTube

Look at the handfuls of police out to deal with these, compared to the massive police presence at EDL marches, yet compare the damage done at EDL marches, with that by normal everyday civilians.

Compare the clothing especially, the clear class differences, wellshaved, clean clear eyed faces and behaviour of the EDL, their neat organised rows and ranks, with how the public actually look and behave, chaotically, in clumps with large gaps between them, in a minor disturbance

The army and police send their raw recruits out, accompanied by many who volunteer for the overtime,and have a marvelous time gassing, clubbing and kicking civilians, riding horses around, and having great fun racing around in their vehicles blaring sirens.

The more considerate cops snatch a couple out the crowd, take them to the station and into the cells, so those cops at the station don't miss out on the fun, who in turn spend many happy hours kicking and punching in the cells, showing each other their karate moves etc. and having a good laugh.

Civilians dance and yell, light fires, everyone has a grand old punch up, and goes home contented.

Here are two clashes, classed as major.

The first is a spontaneous clash, from the days before the police began to take over all forms of resistance.

Again, look at the public's faces, earnest, unshaven, long hair, spectacles etc. when it starts, full of working class folks, tradesmen in overalls, folks in jeans etc, drunks stagger out the pubs, the public mill around, dance, wander off, guys chat up attractive women activists, vendors sell cokes and beers etc.

Then in the second recent one watch how when things begin to get serious, suddenly the police special branch arrive in snatch squad formation, dressed in black as always so the other police don't mistakenly shoot them or beat them, masked, in tip top physical condition, creating carefully orchestrated mayhem, to gain credibility as the real hard core protestors, so they can control and lead all forms of resistance.

Notice though how the men in black never speak to the police, whereas the public do the whole time, some try to reason, others taunt, and watch how special branch focus upon smashing windows etc, to attract crowd attention and establish themselves as the crowd leaders, yet note
how they never actually harm the police, whereas civilians swear at and attack the police, are unmasked, act spontaneously etc

Some of that same public will then a few minutes later go up to the police in the middle of the riot and complain they have had their bag or watch stolen or that someone has scratched their car etc and what are the police going to do about it?
Why don't they go and catch the thief who's over there somewhere, they didn't see his face, but he was wearing jeans they will add, helpfully.

If the public are involved, there is always chaos and confusion.
If not, then it's not the public involved.

Poll Tax Riots London 1990 - YouTube


London Riots 2009, Police, Riot, RBS, Protestors, Fighting - YouTube
__________________
Secede. Control taxbases/municipalities. Use boycotts, divestment, sanctions, strikes.
http://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/...d-Jan-2015.pdf
https://canvasopedia.org/wp-content/...Points-web.pdf

Last edited by Hugh; February 27th, 2014 at 04:23 PM.
 
Old April 11th, 2014 #12
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Jose Mourinho

But even his defensive ideology isn't the crux of Mourinho's belief system. The only thing Mourinho believes in is winning. That sounds obvious, but it's really not. For him, defense is the best way to ensure results. If you don't concede a goal, you're always one score away from victory. It's the distinction Johan Cruyff picked up on when he bashed Mourinho in an interview ahead of this Champions League second leg:

[Mourinho] lost the dressing room at Real Madrid and it's possible the same thing is going to happen at Chelsea. The problem is simply that Mourinho always focuses squarely on the result. Everything else is secondary, even all the top players he has running around for him.

That's the fundamental tension in Mourinho's career: Is he so exalted because he really knows how to win, or does he win because he's gone to places with the best players? And can his style last when, come credit-divvying time, he will usually praise his own genius instead of those world-class players?

Since you can't easily point to one aspect of Mourinho teams that make them inimitably his—besides their propensity to win, which borders on tautology—he is uniquely susceptible to these criticisms. Even when Guardiola's teams lost, that they always went down tiki-taka-or-bust, an almost noble sacrifice to the manager's chosen religion. When the same United team that coasted to the title last season under Ferguson struggles so mightily the year he retires, we imagine all kinds of magic tricks the Scottish wizard must have been using to hide the limits of his squad. When Mourinho loses, you start to wonder whether there actually is anything deeper to the man than results.

But right before that criticism really starts to hit home with Mourinho, he turns around and starts winning again. After a successful-to-everyone-but-the-insatiable-Roman-Abramovich run with Chelsea the first go-round, doubts crept up as to whether his shock Champions League win with Porto really was a fluke. In response, Mourinho moved to Inter and reeled off Serie A's first treble, winning the league, the Italian Cup, and the Champions League. At Madrid, when it looked like Mourinho would never overcome the Best, Most Beautifulest Soccer Team Of All Time, he won La Liga with the highest-ever point total.

When Chelsea started this season shakily, and Mourinho made it clear to everyone that he didn't rate their two-time player of the year Juan Mata, the whispers about his management began anew. Then Chelsea took advantage of a couple Man City and Arsenal slip-ups to sit atop the league for much of the latter half of the season, bolstering his credentials almost as soon as they were questioned.

http://deadspin.com/typical-jose-che...ght-1561256468
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 PM.
Page generated in 0.18396 seconds.