|1 Week Ago||#1|
Join Date: Sep 2019
Letter to the feminists
Letter to the feminists:
Those who call themselves feminists today will be surprised to know that they have adopted a creed that was designed a priori to destroy them in their nature and essence, to subvert all of their natural instincts and tendencies so that they may be used as slave labour proletarians and even worse as sex slaves or fallen women who must seek out a tenebrous existence as mere chattels in the brothels of Arabs, Jews, and various other of the subhuman usurpers and oppressors of whites in the latter’s own territory. This creed of feminism, created by the diabolic cabal of international Jewry, was engineered in their think tanks for the purposes aforementioned through appealing to the vanity and egotism inborn in woman through portraying them as courageous victims of the oppression of heterosexual white men, those whom the cabal seek to destroy as the predominant obstacle of their global supremacy. Thus this strawman of the white male oppressor is created to encourage a war between the sexes, the result being a breakup and disunity of the nuclear family and its supplantation with the state: in the
case of women they become married to the state while in the case of children they are raised by the state (school system, etc.) and not by their biological mother. – Instead the motherland is their mother, the nanny state. The displacement of natural roles of the sexes leads to the breakup of society through the subversion of natural instinctual behaviour and their social embodiment in traditional roles. Additionally the wages could be reduced, cost of living increased (as more competition for resources exists and reduced supply equates to an increased demand which increases the price) and thereby engendering increasing poverty and a declining birth rate of white children which is the end goal of Jews where the whites are concerned, namely their genocide. Thus the destruction of woman as such, as a natural being with natural tendencies and the basis of society, completes itself through feminism. Feminism is posited as a rebellious creed and implicitly suggests that this is something desirable or a goal to be sought when in reality it is simply a rebellion against nature and the natural order of things which simply perpetuates an artificial society of anti-natural perversity (wherein women are men via feminism and men are women via faggotism). The true rebellion at this time lies in the stoical creed of ‘living in accordance with nature’, adopting traditional sexual roles and living as nature intended, having many children and raising them within the parameters of a nuclear family relationship for the perpetuation of one’s own white race not the supremacy of Jews or various and sundry alien races/species such as the Chinese, Arabs, Negros, etc. To be a true rebel against the evil in the world and to defend the right one must be a white racial loyalist whose loyalties lie with oneself and one’s own, not the enemy who masquerades as a friend. Blood will always be thicker than water.
|1 Week Ago||#2|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Let's move on to a superb speech Adolf Hitler gave to women of the National Socialist Women's League on September 8, 1934:
'The slogan 'Emancipation of Women' was invented by Jewish intellectuals and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had necessarily given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.
In fact the woman was least likely to challenge his position. Only when he was not absolutely certain in his knowledge of his task did the eternal instinct of self and race-preservation begin to rebel in women. There then grew from this rebellion a state of affairs which was unnatural and which lasted until both sexes returned to the respective spheres which an eternally wise providence had preordained for them.
If the man's world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman's is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives? No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man's world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.
We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.
The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation of the functions of each.
It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole community...
So our women's movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National Socialist national community acquires a firm basis precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical fellow-combatants, women who have fought for the common life in the service of the common task of preserving life, who in that combat did not set their sights on the rights which a Jewish intellectualism put before their eyes, but rather on the duties imposed by nature on all of us in common. Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.'
The JEWs Plan Is to Exterminate the White People – What Fricking Part Don't YOU Get?
|1 Week Ago||#3|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In a dystopian nightmare
Announcing Jane Fonda As Special Guest To Women's Conference
Some feminazi sent this to me
My response (along with a gif of Mad Men guy vomiting). I lost ability to post pics and gifs after I got Windows 10. I have doozies.
Political correctness is oppression disguised as good manners.
|feminism, mgtow, sex, sexism, women|