Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 21st, 2006 #1
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default ARI/ Randroid organizational strategy: deconstruct Jewish methods

ARI is a Jewish front. It's an interesting one however as it espouses "objectivism" the liberterianesque philosophy of Jewess Rosenbaum aka Ayn Rand. Rand was a gifted novelist who puked forth a sort of atheist materialist kosher right wingism she called "liberterianism" which gave many Jews entry into Republican circles such as Alan Greenspan, her buddy, and eventually has dovetailed closely with other neocon currents.

However in many ways it remains a distinct sect of neconservativism. It's controlled by Rand's literary executor Leonard Peikoff, who of course is a Jew. All the "big Os" as they call the senior sanhedrin, are Jews.

Consider the organizational reach and potency of ARI and ask what lessons can be learned and applied to the White situation?


http://www.objectivism.net/

http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer
 
Old March 1st, 2006 #2
Warlord
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 636
Default

Objectivism is a subset of Libertarianism and not a subset of Neoconservatism, although there is some overlap and ARI seems to be big on the Iraq war. ARI has a competitor in The Objectivist Institute: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/ which were formed by disgruntled ARI members in the '90s and may be as large or even larger. It seems less Jewy than ARI.

WNs should look at other movements to see how they formed, grew and over come or fell to obsticles. The Libbies are a good case - as a movment it didn't exist until the 1960s. The biggest factor in its formulation was "Atlas Shrugged", much like how the "The Turner Diaries" affected the WN movement (except that AS discussed philosophy while TD had little more than action ["Hunter" was better in this regard]). There was also a sugar daddy in the form of Charles Koch, who founded several L organizations, though those groups are now financially independant.

The movement works on several fronts. ARI and TOI attempt to promote L at a philosophical level. The Cato Institute deals with national and foreign policy in Washington. The Manhattan Institute supports academic research (they financed "The Bell Curve"). The Reason Magazine has a glossy monthly magazine and deals with privatization issues (such as private toll highways). The Libertarian Party is political (and I think have about 800 elected members). The Libertarian Futurist Society which promotes L oriented science fiction. Liberty deals with internal movement issues (and critiques other L organizations). The International Society for Individual Liberty coordinates with foreign L groups. And there are many other groups.

WN is heavy with "activist" groups fighting each other for dues paying members but appear to be light on other organizations. AmRen does some statistical research; The Pioneer Society supports some academic research (though it is hard to find out much about it); and that appears to be it. VNN wants to be a multimedia operation; I don't think the Libbies have anything like that, though they can use regular media outlets (I've seen them on C-SPAN and read their OpEd articles).

The Warlord
 
Old March 2nd, 2006 #3
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Warlord,

You speak knowledgeably about this topic. But you do not recognize liberterianism as a folk dividing species of Jewish materialism?

We can take all the real insights of Austrian economics and put them in the service of our people. Or, we can take all the propaganda of Jews, and let it divide us.

Objectivism is certainly allied to neoconservativism, and not just via well placed friends like Alan Greenspan. There are others. Like Jew, economics and law professor Richard Epstein at University of Chicago. Now, reference the University of Chicago economics professors with the Straussians. Now, reference the overlap and active participation of the University of Chicago economists with the CIA which supported Pinochet and the economic reforms he enacted in Chile. Now you have a Jewish trifecta.

Why would liberterians need independent media? Liberterianism is a Jewish owned movement at this time and ergo they already have their foot in the door of mass media.
 
Old March 2nd, 2006 #4
Warlord
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
Warlord,

You speak knowledgeably about this topic. But you do not recognize liberterianism as a folk dividing species of Jewish materialism?
Libertarianism evolved out of the Classical Liberalism, which term "Liberalism" has been expropriated by the soft socialists we we call liberals today. The Jewish element separated it from conservativism the 1960s into the today's movement. The main issue of concern to us is that Libertarianism doesn't recognize racial differences and promotes open borders. Which tends to negate its good points (second admendment rights, school choice, freedom of association). It is ambivalent about Israel, with some for and others against (though the two objectivist groups seem to be pro-Israel). I vote Libertarian when a candidate makes his rare appearance on the ballot because the two main parties also support the bad aspects without supporting the good (Republicans at the higher party level appear to be ambivalent about gun rights believing that simply stalling leftist advances is good enough).

War
 
Old March 2nd, 2006 #5
grep14w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 283
Default

"Objectivists" are not just "pro-Israel"; they are a Jewish cult.

Read about the Ayn Rand cult. Scary stuff; a bit like Marxism or any other Jewish political movement in spite of its alleged libertarianism. Good book to read is Jerome Tuccille's "It Usually Begins with Ayn Rand", even though Tuccille gives no hint of understanding race or the Jewish question, it does show you a bit of the madness inherent in "Objectivism" as in all Jewish messianic movements.

Officially "Objectivism" is anti-collectivist, but blood is thicker than water and the truth outs when it really counts. "Objectivists" support Israel and the "war on terror" and become de facto collectivists when it is Jewish interests at stake. Their "individualism" is strictly a pose, which they adhere to for purely ideological reasons, and only when and where appropriate.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 AM.
Page generated in 2.69538 seconds.