|
|
August 20th, 2007 | #1 |
Administrator
|
Taking VNNB to jewsmedia professional level - and beyond
Ideas:
To reach jewsmedia level: - original programming from noon to midnight daily - no cursing - no technical problems in bringing guests/callers on and off To go beyond jewsmedia level: - no extended show intros - hosts with better knowledge than average talk hosts - refusal to obey Semitically Correct taboos - infrequent commercial interruptions - archives arranged chronologically with show notes for easy reference |
August 20th, 2007 | #2 |
W.N.F
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,063
|
Taking VNNB to jewsmedia professional level - and beyond
Taking VNNB to jewsmedia professional level - and beyond?
Get other stations to carry it, online and offline. There's a million internet sites, and a million local radio stations, who would carry a broadcast if it was tightly scheduled, and high quality. I'll be blunt, we have a web-broadcast on our forum, it runs 24/7, we're always looking for new hosts and/or content, so if there were good shows being done here, at fixed scheduled hours, we'd be interested in carrying them, and I'm sure plenty of others would too, but when (as has happened a few times lately) it's all domestic drama (Mashers nutsack?) then our audience would not only not want to hear, but wouldn't have a clue what it was about anyway. I mean imagine turning on CNN in the morning to find a show hosted by Heidi Collins, talking about Tony Harris's nutsack, and how he left her a rude message in her dressing room, or hearing him whine he doesn't like the pants she's wearing. It might get a big audience, for a brief while, whilst people rubbernecked the train wreck of a broadcast, but news show it wouldn't be. There's some good broadcasters here, and some good shows, but people need to take it to the next level, and part of that is increasing the audience, and getting the show broadcast on other sites, and other stations (which is a good way of spreading the message, without raping the bandwidth), and to do that people have to remember they are broadcasting to the masses, not just to the people on the forum. At it's peak the ADV attracted over 250,000 listeners a show, and that ain't so many years ago, so the audience is out there. |
August 20th, 2007 | #3 |
Broadcaster
|
Well that would mean money.....something no one has or at least is not willing to put up much of. So until then everyone can just suck it up and listen to the occasional story of someones nut sack and find the good material in between the fights and comedy (Not that comedy isn't good material).
Before we can even consider doing anything of professional value we need all the closet racists to get up off their asses and do some sort of activism in the 1st place. out of the thousands of WN's out there only dozens are even active in confronting the Jew. My point? DO SOMETHING....Broadcast, direct mailings, video, audio, build a website. PF |
August 20th, 2007 | #4 | ||||||
W.N.F
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,063
|
Quote:
Good material sells, good material attracts money. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My point? A lot of people do stuff, many might not make a big show about it, but they do stuff, hundreds of them, possibly even thousands, on a regular basis. What we have to do is take that to the next level, and that's not just about money that's about ourselves as well. I can stick up two sites tomorrow, at identical costs, one a piece of shit I put no effort into, and one a labor of love, which ones going to attract the visitors and funding? We're never going to get other stations, or sites, to carry broadcasts while we tell them they can just suck it up, and likewise the money won't come until we show we're worth the funding. We can't raise sufficient funds to make a difference internally, we can only achieve it by reaching beyond where we are now. |
||||||
August 20th, 2007 | #5 | |
Broadcaster
|
Quote:
Sounds like you are one of the few dozen whites who makes an effort. Congrats and keep it up! |
|
August 20th, 2007 | #6 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Even nutsack stuff isn't necessarily bad; jew Stern does nutsack materal. Can you do better nutsack material than jew Stern is the question. One thing about radio: we have proven demand for it. The same is not true of our newspaper. There is a little interest but not much. Given radio can be produced for under 100/month, it's clear where our efforts ought to go. |
|
August 20th, 2007 | #7 | |
Broadcaster
|
Quote:
I realize that we don't NEED lots of money to get it done but our sound quality is less than perfect, our broadcast server takes a big dump on a consistent basis, and all the broadcasters have work for 10-15 hours a day and can't be up to their true potential because of it. never the less we are making it happen slowly but surely and in one way or another it will grow.....But with a good budget we could make it explode like an atom bomb. I know as long as I can have a broadband connection I will make my voice heard. |
|
August 20th, 2007 | #8 | |
W.N.F
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,063
|
Quote:
As I said in my first post there's a lot of good broadcasts, and I'm sure any criticisms are meant as constructive, and no way meant to detract from the good work already done. |
|
August 20th, 2007 | #9 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
I'm going to produce my first show tomorrow afternoon barring unexpected problems. What we need first and last is stuff that people want to hear. That drives the rest. |
|
August 20th, 2007 | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,506
|
Some ideas:
Live broadcasting is not necessary all or even most of the day. That's why CNN ends up being so ridiculous - reporting on the smallest and most insignificant things. They have too much time to fill and not enough real news. Tightly edited audio pieces or prerecorded interviews could fill out the schedule, adding variety to the channel. Concise news bumpers could be played at the top of the hour like AM radio or NPR - the top stories from an Aryan perspective. Usually only one or two of these need be produced per day. Specialized shows (like Aryan versions of Money Talk, Siskel and Ebert, This Old House, or any number of other topics). Podcasts/mp3s are as important as live broadcasts and should be advertised regularly on the channel (i.e. go to this website to download these mp3s in a searchable database). Easily accessible broadcasting schedule. |
September 5th, 2007 | #11 |
out surfing. won't be back
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: where it's 4-6 & glassy
Posts: 2,879
|
There's a lot to be said for tighter scheduling.
These are things that I think we should include in every single live broadcast: I think it should be a given that each show plugs the previous live show during the opening segment, and the next live show during the closing segment. Every show should also make a short appeal for monetary support. "If you like what you hear, support us by sending your shekels to: A. Linder, etc etc." We should also never forget to mention the archives, along with the media index w/ the podcasts. I desperately want to see more people subscribing to the podcasts. It sucks because it's hard to get people to try it, but a very high percentage of people can't imagine living w/o them once they do. Could you clarify here? I don't understand what this means. |
September 7th, 2007 | #12 |
out surfing. won't be back
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: where it's 4-6 & glassy
Posts: 2,879
|
the f-bomb has *got* to go. de-rails the whole thing.
Also, when we have tech issues, say, someone can't hear, move on. Have them reboot, or make a Skype Test Call and figure it out. When they reboot and call back in w/ things working, don't spend more than .5 seconds on talking about the problem. Drive straight forward. |
September 8th, 2007 | #13 |
.
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,718
|
Two main things could be improved: sound quality, and education value.
If the sound is too badly distorted, as some FTLs are, it's just too uncomfortable to listen to, so I fast forward and maybe miss something that should have been important or interesting. Okay, some people listen to all of it, no matter how shitty it sounds, but some people are like me, and skip over half of it. The main problem with sound quality seems to be in the encoding for the link to shoutcast. Some hosts get it right, but most make it much too loud so the signal gets clipped. For example, here's Stan Sikorski, who always sounds good Here's a clip from another recent broadcast, which sounded so bad I couldn't listen to it When the signal gets limited at the top and bottom of the chart like that, it causes massive clipping distortion (crackling, hissing noises). If you want to improve sound quality, ask Stan what he does (what software, software settings, type of mic, how he uses the mic, etc), and do the same. Then there's education value. Most people have a job, a family and a life, and don't have time to listen to 6 hours of Linder Radio, so if there's something important in the 5th hour, not many people are going to hear it. If you want to educate people about jews, it would be better to have a well planned and focussed talk lasting one hour at the most. Think of it like a college lecture, or use The Teaching Company as a model. If you want to do a little education with 6 hours of "My Favourite Music", make that a separate show. Just my $0.02 |
September 8th, 2007 | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 1,346
|
I think Bud White is doing a terrific job, Mark in calli is making great contributions to the show and I believe it will naturally improve as they get more comfortable with talking on air.
__________________
Fire up the trains, It's time for uncle jewey to head to happy camp Who the fuck says israel has a right to exist "Name the jew" -Bud White |
September 23rd, 2007 | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 68
|
I,myself have a love/hate relationship with FTL Broadcasts. I listen to alot of different podcasts from different sites and my favorite is VNN. Stan &Yankee Jim ,plus Bud& Mark are the best. They get their point across without being so phony professional. Those guys may not get to report everything that they planned, on their shows, but get the message across and their shows sound genuine and not planned out.
My hate relationship is with the technical problems. Alot of the other podcasts I listen to, from other sites are 1000% better and these other shows don't have anymore money or technical brilliance than VNN. Example is one guy who talks about gun rights. He is an Auto Worker and does his own show when he has time,by himself. The bad tech problems from VNN involve the feed clipping(skipping), mic volume set to high causing distortion or the feed sounding like it's being broadcast under water.Sometimes I had to stop listening because I didn't understand what was being said. It would be great to have broadcasts everyday even if they were only 1/2, 1 , or 2 hours. VNN is a great web site I spend most of my time on daily. Keep up the good work. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|