Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 23rd, 2013 #1
Bobby Bandanza
The anti-Jew.
 
Bobby Bandanza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,539
Default Nordic Resistance Movement

Motståndsrörelsen på Ljungbyheds Gammelmarknad
Quote:
Av Simon Lindberg, 2013-08-22
[email protected]

Motståndsrörelsen fanns representerad med marknadsstånd på Ljungbyheds Gammelmarknad för att sälja tröjor och litteratur. Här följer Nästeschefens berättelse om dagen.
https://www.nordfront.se/motstandsro...ds-marknad.smr
 
Old August 23rd, 2013 #2
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Default

Forget the "Party of Swedes" conservative shitheads, these guys are the Golden Dawn of Sweden.

I highly recommend watching their videos where they do their public speaking and clash with Communists. This small heroic corp of young men are fighting against time and odds, yet I get a feeling they are going places and the only hope of their coutry.

Here is their youtube channel which shows their activism and brawls with the ANTIFA scum http://www.youtube.com/user/Motstand...?feature=watch
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; August 23rd, 2013 at 07:53 PM.
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #3
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Smith View Post
Forget the "Party of Swedes" conservative shitheads, these guys are the Golden Dawn of Sweden.

I highly recommend watching their videos where they do their public speaking and clash with Communists. This small heroic corp of young men are fighting against time and odds, yet I get a feeling they are going places and the only hope of their coutry.

Here is their youtube channel which shows their activism and brawls with the ANTIFA scum http://www.youtube.com/user/Motstand...?feature=watch
They're not exactly the Golden Dawn of Sweden, since they're not an electorate party. They're a hard line military-styled resistance movement that is going the non-parliamentary route, but that maintains friendly relationships with the Party of the Swedes. A better characterization would be that Golden Dawn is a combination of the two branches, but that is not really correct either, as the Party of the Swedes are fighting a low intensity war against the antifas on a daily basis, and are made up of many nationalist veterans that have been battling it out on the streets for many decades.

I.e, the "conservative shitheads" in the Party of the Swedes are far closer to being the "Golden Dawn of Sweden". They're also forming closer ties with them, and already have close exchange with parties like NPD and Svoboda.

They're however in a different phase, as a relatively newly started (actually renamed, they're the former National socialist front - "conservative", aye?) and still small party, that are pulling all resources together to try to look past earlier inner nationalist-differences, uniting members and veterans from other different parties and initiatives, under the one banner of reclaiming the country and saving it from the demographical existential threat, sorting out any eventual smaller differences later. We simply can't afford to waste another decade on inner squabbling and bravado pissing matches.

Fighting off antifas is not what wins you votes or popular support in and off itself, as you will surely agree, but it's a necessary step to secure and enable the physical space to do the actual political work. Most Greeks voting for Golden Dawn are not aware of the scope of the blood spilled necessary to even bring them the message and for them to be able to have a presence on the street, hell, even most new members are not aware of what the veterans had to endure and sacrifice for the party to be where they are today.

The serious and concrete political goal is what's important, and it should always be put in the forefront. Party of the Swedes are doing the fighting on the street level, but not for its own sake, for the thrill and the violence shiftlessly, because that just makes for pointless, mindless subcultural EDL-styled hooligan brawling.

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 24th, 2013 at 02:22 PM.
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #4
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Anyway, the Nordic Resistance Movement is a great force, and they share the clear cut fundamental racial/ethnic-nationalist credo. The most important difference regards the best way to achieve victory, well, of course apart from the fact that they're a Nordic movement fighting for a Nordic Union with branches also in Denmark, Norway and Finland. Further down the line, if approaching a real political climax, if one of them have clearly crystalized itself as the strongest, most capable and realistic option, I'm confident that most of the members from the weaker side, or perhaps even the party itself, will recognize this and merge to unite.


________________________________________________________________




Nordic Resistance Movement's leader Klas Lund

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 24th, 2013 at 03:12 PM.
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #5
panos
Junior Member
 
panos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Hellas
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solskeniskyn View Post
They're not exactly the Golden Dawn of Sweden, since they're not an electorate party. They're a hard line military-styled resistance movement that is going the non-parliamentary route, but that maintains friendly relationships with the Party of the Swedes. A better characterization would be that Golden Dawn is a combination of the two branches, but that is not really correct either, as the Party of the Swedes are fighting a low intensity war against the antifas on a daily basis, and are made up of many nationalist veterans that have been battling it out on the streets for many decades.

I.e, the "conservative shitheads" in the Party of the Swedes are far closer to being the "Golden Dawn of Sweden". They're also forming closer ties with them, and already have close exchange with parties like NPD and Svoboda.

They're however in a different phase, as a relatively newly started (actually renamed, they're the former National socialist front - "conservative", aye?) and still small party, that are pulling all resources together to try to look past earlier inner nationalist-differences, uniting members and veterans from other different parties and initiatives, under the one banner of reclaiming the country and saving it from the demographical existential threat, sorting out any eventual smaller differences later. We simply can't afford to waste another decade on inner squabbling and bravado pissing matches.
I agree with you, Svenskarnas parti is definitely not a neo-con party. The fact that GD has ties with them(and with NRM too, I think) is for me the only proof I need, as a Greek who doesn't know much about Swedish politics. I also like the NRM but, as past experience has shown, the parliamentary path should not be ignored. It is a great deal to be able to use the system's weapons against it. Josef Goebbels explained it perfectly: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/angrif06.htm
The thing is, when you follow this road, for propaganda needs you have to alter your image a little(but not your beliefs). Sometimes this tactic is mistaken for a betrayal of your original ideology, but I'm sure that's exactly what Goebbels would do himself. Finally, I have a question I 'd like to ask you. You 've already mentioned that NRM is in favour of Nordic unification. Does Svenskarnas parti and other scandinavian nationalist groups also share the same view?
__________________
"If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good" Ezra Pound
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #6
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by panos View Post
I agree with you, Svenskarnas parti is definitely not a neo-con party. The fact that GD has ties with them(and with NRM too, I think) is for me the only proof I need, as a Greek who doesn't know much about Swedish politics. I also like the NRM but, as past experience has shown, the parliamentary path should not be ignored. It is a great deal to be able to use the system's weapons against it. Josef Goebbels explained it perfectly: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/angrif06.htm
The thing is, when you follow this road, for propaganda needs you have to alter your image a little(but not your beliefs). Sometimes this tactic is mistaken for a betrayal of your original ideology, but I'm sure that's exactly what Goebbels would do himself. Finally, I have a question I 'd like to ask you. You 've already mentioned that NRM is in favour of Nordic unification. Does Svenskarnas parti and other scandinavian nationalist groups also share the same view?
Svenskarnas parti (english= Party of the Swedes for any unfamiliar thread readers) are not for a nordic unification, no. They do however advocate close ties and cooperation between the nordic brother countries.

The only nationalist party of significance advocating for a nordic unification is The Nordic Resistance Movement. It was however quite recently that it took this name, as previously the Swedish (original) branch had marched under the name of the "Swedish Resistance Movement", and the smaller nordic branches formed the last couple of years one by one, under their equivalent name(s). All formed with Nordic unity in mind from the get go, so the namechange came natural, and the other respective national leaders rank under Klas Lund who is the leader overseeing the whole movement. The last branch to complete the Nordic unity in Iceland is missing, but as I understand it, it's under way and will soon be officially launched.


Henrik Jarsbo from the newly formed Danish branch shakes hand with the movement leader Klas Lund.

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 24th, 2013 at 05:52 PM.
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #7
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default


The Danes Henrik Asferg och Henrik Jarsbo from the recent official launch in Denmark. The viking blood in these men is unmistakable.

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 24th, 2013 at 05:47 PM.
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #8
panos
Junior Member
 
panos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Hellas
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solskeniskyn View Post
Svenskarnas parti (english= Party of the Swedes for any unfamiliar thread readers) are not for a nordic unification, no. They do however advocate close ties and cooperation between the nordic brother countries.

The only nationalist party of significance advocating for a nordic unification is The Nordic Resistance Movement. It was however quite recently that it took this name, as previously the Swedish (original) branch had marched under the name of the "Swedish Resistance Movement", and the smaller nordic branches formed the last couple of years one by one, under their equivalent name(s). All formed with Nordic unity in mind from the get go, so the namechange came natural, and the other respective national leaders rank under Klas Lund who is the leader overseeing the whole movement. The last branch to complete the Nordic unity in Iceland is missing, but as I understand it, it's under way and will soon be officially launched.


Henrik Jarsbo from the newly formed Danish branch shakes hand with the movement leader Klas Lund.
Thanks for the info. It would be great to see all the Vikings united in one nation!
__________________
"If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good" Ezra Pound
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #9
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Good sign - burliness. First thing I noticed about Golden Dawn. Brains are needed of course, but it seems like brawn is more important at this point.
 
Old August 24th, 2013 #10
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

I'm digging the comments from all you guys, too. Very informative.
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #11
Lars Redoubt
Thomsonist-Frenzian
 
Lars Redoubt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Svithiod.
Posts: 2,142
Default

Party of Swedes + Nordic Resistance Movement: A perfect combination!
__________________
Ek trui a matt minn ok megin.
DOWZ! ORION! 88!
Visit Robert Frenz' FAEM: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/faem/
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #12
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solskeniskyn View Post
Anyway, the Nordic Resistance Movement is a great force, and they share the clear cut fundamental racial/ethnic-nationalist credo. The most important difference regards the best way to achieve victory, well, of course apart from the fact that they're a Nordic movement fighting for a Nordic Union with branches also in Denmark, Norway and Finland.

A Nordic Union is logical, one big NS state for the Scandinavian folk.

What about Estonia? Their connection to Finland makes them a possible candidate for the union as well?

This Nordic Union would need to leave NATO (Denmark Norway Estonia) even so called 'Partnership for Peace', and establish special relations with a, hopefully, ethnic nationalist Russia, also in the south with soon to be GD governed Greece.
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers

Last edited by Serbian; August 25th, 2013 at 09:17 AM.
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #13
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serbian View Post
A Nordic Union is logical, one big NS state for the Scandinavian folk.

What about Estonia? Their connection to Finland makes them a possible candidate for the union as well?

This Nordic Union would need to leave NATO (Denmark Norway Estonia) even so called 'Partnership for Peace', and establish special relations with a, hopefully, ethnic nationalist Russia, also in the south with soon to be GD governed Greece.
I'm sure that I've read a discussion on the topic of possible Estonian inclusion before, but can't seem to find it. At the moment, as things stand, it's the straight orhodox Nordic countries: Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Iceland. (Greenland belongs to Denmark too, so that adds ~2 million square km of snow filled artic areal, hehe. ) But they're leaving the door half-open to a possible baltic inclusion.

The question re:Nato and future defence alliances and geopolitical positioning is very interesting, and it is an interesting mind game to speculate and imagine and how the political map will be redrawn if the chips fall our way. Needless to say, whatever happens, NATO, if it survives in the coming turbulent times, will not be a friend.

They have a very high quality website at www.nordfront.se with an active newsfeed and extensive and well written ideological content. I'll post translated pieces, becase unfortunately it doesn't appear to be browsable through google translate any longer (I'm a safety/encryption/etc. illiterate).

_____________________________________________________________________________




Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 25th, 2013 at 12:43 PM.
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #14
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Future governance


By Klas Lund
[email protected]
Leader of the resistance movement

One of the most lucid, succinct and sound outlines of a National socialist governance that I've ever read. In swedish, that is, but it machine translates decently enough to english.
______________________________________________________________

This article is based on a speech by the Resistance leader Klas Lund. The text addresses the organization's position on governance which must prevail in the future Nordic countries. Here is National Socialism in its proper perspective.

The resistance movement fighting to create a free and united Scandinavia. We struggle to create a Nordic national socialist republic consisting of the Nordic countries, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and possibly the Baltic countries.

A united Scandinavia would secure the Nordic peoples independence and thus their racial and cultural survival - and from this Nordic fortress was then a further struggle for national socialism organized and carried out the world.

It is our main goal and it clarified the following question of what kind of government we intend to introduce in such a state.

It has already been mentioned the word republic as the designation of this polity, which should provide some indication of the type of system that we intend to create.


A STRONG FORCE
But before we go any further on the form of government, it is an important thing that should first be explained. Only a strong force can liberate our people from our enemies death grip. Only a strong force to conduct a national socialist revolution and enforce the necessary radical changes to society as required.

Only a radical, uncompromising organization - a revolutionary cutting edge - can defeat the current system and create a new future for our people.

For such a powerful force to become reality, strong disciplined people. The people in its current state can not develop the sense of purpose and power needed, but must first be given the right spirit, they must be educated and trained by an organization created for the purpose.

An organization seeking to become this strong force to go back to - and find strength in - the old ideals, ways of thinking and patterns of behavior that once made the race strong; honor, hierarchy, discipline and loyalty. Such an organization must follow the leadership principles and be firm organized. Such an organization can not be considered particularly "democratic", at least not if you compare it with today's smooth pacifist parties.

But we do not have a developed democracy in the organization today does not mean that there will be dictatorship in the new state we intend to build when we have freed the Nordic region.

Trying to compare the organization's current governance of the society we want to build would be to some extent as to compare the Army's form of government with the current democracy.

An army is a defense organization, and then old is probably all - except a few detached from reality fools - agreed that an army can not be democratically controlled. This does not in any way that we are an army or even to our organization resembles a military structure, but only to the stresses we are exposed to, and the challenges we face are extreme, this is because we are a genuine opposition to the current system, and thus subjected to a much harsher treatment of the system than other groups encounter.

Sometimes we can hear how the system defends his illegal actions against us by claiming that it is entitled to use undemocratic means because we are not democrats.

To cope with this onslaught from the system, we need a firm and clear leadership that does not at any time be questioned by the common man - and we need an equally solid hierarchical structure.

Thus, we can conclude that we must have an authoritarian organization during the liberation struggle, but you can not put an equal sign between the Resistance current governance and the polity that will exist in the future Nordic National Socialist Republic.

ANTI DEMOCRATS?
We are constantly accused of being anti-democratic. It is claimed in the media that we want to impose dictatorship - this, they say, because we are National Socialists, or Nazis as they prefer to call us - and to equate National Socialism and dictatorship.
The truth is that we National Socialists want to live in a society where the rule of law exists and where citizens have a say. And where there exists freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association.

Our approach to the concept of democracy is problematic, this first and foremost because of the word democracy has become synonymous with the current decadent, controlled by Zionists, the system in the western world and all that it stands for.

When the National Socialist thinking of the current so-called democratic system will be mild nausea. It is the symbol of all that we are receiving, all that we want to fight. Then it is easy for it sometimes happens, for example, on demonstrations, some of us might get the idea that shouting slogans such as "crush democracy" even if it is half-baked and involves non-skilled listeners who hear this misunderstand it and think that we think we want to take away freedom and impose dictatorship , which is not true.

Shouting slogans like "crush democracy" or "Death to Democracy" is that in practice serve real idiot arguments to our enemies - and we do absolutely not.

TODAY'S "DEMOCRACY"
Our strong reaction against the so-called democracy is all natural. The concept of democracy is in constant change. This term means today something it is absolutely not meant for 100 or 50 years ago. It also means different things in different countries. Very few people who lived a hundred years ago had supported democracy if they then found out that the word for example, would imply a mass invasion of rasfrämlingar and to our own people would be displaced in their own country, or that it would include the right of transsexuals to have Orgy similar festivals in our streets, it would lead to general moral decay, hedonism, pornography and violent movies would wash over the country and so on.

The changes have been gradual, and only in this way has been the people to go along with this, and so has the work of destruction who our enemies are called democracy could be achieved.

In Sweden today, the word democracy come to be used in the system's propaganda for everything you want to accomplish. Thus, it is today e.g. a democratic right that two homosexuals are allowed to marry and adopt children.

Being against homosexuality as a phenomenon today is equated with being "anti-democratic".

On the whole, tend in their propaganda to signify all that is undemocratic and anti-democratic in any way questioning the current trend.

Being a so-called democrat today is in fact being followers, consciously or unconsciously, to the Zionist finansplutokratin, an international upper class that strives to tear down all the borders, break down all resistance and open up to a total exploitation of natural resources, people and animals on earth.

Thus, one can put an equal sign between the current concept of democracy and any policy that seeks to break down everything that means we can survive as a people. They want to transform the Aryan people to view solve proletarian slaves, and destroy the Aryan civilization. Their policy is about doing everything that leads us to weaken.

All these destructive policies are woven into beautiful expression of human and democratic rights. It is the beautiful phrases, the incredibly skilled propaganda, from hundreds of thousands of political prostitutes; journalists, politicians and others who with false tongues and pens serve a Zionist system of exploitation of the judas money.

If this is the real meaning of the word democracy - yes then we are sworn enemies of this.

But, as the reader will understand it does not mean that we are against freedom, or government by the people, the citizens have legal rights and participation. But the word democracy, because of the foregoing, may readily a very negative connotation in our ears.

But there have been democracies that we National Socialists can easily sympathize with. The Norse form of government with things which long survived in Iceland is an example. Boerrepublikerna, Orange Free State and Transvaal in South Africa, for more than a century ago was crushed by the British Empire, is another example.

The early American republic idea was also commendable. You should also recollecting that National Socialism came to power in Germany through free elections and applied direct democracy on some issues. Something David Elias has highlighted in his article "Freedom in the Third Reich" in the National Resistance No. 15.

There are more examples. But a common factor in the examples I have mentioned here is that they are representative of the Germanic peoples striving, through history, for freedom and self-determination.

So we are not entirely negative attitude towards the concept of democracy, depending on what is defined as and the values ​​that are included in this concept.

One can then ask whether we should make it as easy for our enemies to let them dismiss us as so-called anti-democrats, then we actually are for basic democratic rights, but not the same as our enemies today defines as being democratic. It should be added that our concept of true democracy stands much closer to the original idea than the system mean is democracy today - mainly democracy in Athens in antiquity.

FUTURE GOVERNANCE
As to the question of what kind of government will prevail in the future National Socialist Republic.

Some of you may have already wondered, what happens to the resistance movement when we have won? For we can not continue to be a resistance movement when we liberated the Nordic region.

The organization is not meant to be dissolved, but it is supposed to be transformed into a state bearing the words National Socialist (NSO), which permeates the entire society of the future. You could describe this word as a kind of "väktarskap" who are tasked to maintain, protect and nurture the new National Socialist Republic's foundations.

The senior members of the NSO will form a National Socialist highest senate, Nordic Senate, whose foremost task is to select the leader of the new republic. The Senate shall also advise the conductor.

At first glance, this may seem undemocratic, that political leadership should come from the NSO. However, this is far from a complete picture of how we imagine that the republic should be governed.

Despite Resistance Movement strives to create a state with authoritarian leadership, it is also our goal to develop and secure freedom and democracy. The Nordic National Socialist Republic will be a core state, but it will also be a people's democracy.

Resistance will develop democracy by fundamentally changing it. We do not have dictatorship. We want the opposite to create a freer state with more responsible and responsible citizens aware of their rights as well as obligations.

Another very important thing: the Nordic Republic will be a rule.

It is worth mentioning, on the rule of law, that the present democratic system tries to equate itself and our ancient Norse legal system, this is false. The truth is that the free society that was built with good laws and created by our ancestors, is the result of a development of the Nordic society for thousands of years. So there is no modern invention of so-called progressive forces. On the contrary, especially the Nordic social structure served as a bulwark against the progressive forces' ongoing effort to annihilate all Aryan culture and civilization.

The National Socialist State will be a rule where the legislative power is separate from the executive. This basically means that the laws passed by an elected parliament, approved by a senate, but that these laws are then applied by independent courts and government administration without interference from parliament, senate, or the leader of the Republic.

In the Nordic Republic would also basic human rights are respected and the citizen would be legally protected regardless of origin, political or religious beliefs. Everyone would have equal status before the law.

TERMS OF TRUE DEMOCRACY
Now, many are asking themselves, what do we do with the royal house / houses? For we are talking not just about Sweden, but of the entire Nordic region. It goes without saying that the monarchy will be abolished. In a state that is imbued with National Socialist people's community is no place for class thinking or royalty. The word socialism in National Socialism is there for good reason and should be taken seriously.

One important thing to establish a truly representative government is to limit the potential for very wealthy families to establish themselves in other people's expense. Some wealth will of course be allowed, we are not communists, but some kind of laws will apply when private companies, individuals or families accumulate too much capital.

A prerequisite for true democracy, liberation and democratization of the media. In our country we have the Jewish Bonnier family as an obvious example: as long as the media is dominated by foreign, Zionist and capitalist interests, which has a monopoly over the dissemination of information, no real democracy to prevail. It goes without saying that such media dominance must be broken by any means. It is about every person's right to his own consciousness, the ability to form their own independent opinion.

To destroy such a monopoly could for example be done by expropriating, then seize, these media companies; subsequently nationalize some of them, put down others and distribute the rest to cooperatives and associations. By return the media to the national community, government, associations and cooperatives we democratize them.

In the National Socialist Republic will the commercial media ownership highly restricted, instead, thus associations, NGOs, cooperatives and others to be encouraged and supported by the state to publish a variety of media so that information, a wide spectrum of political views and a wide range of culture ensured.

A freer more popular media is thus a prerequisite for true democracy and for such reforms, society would not be the same.

The most suitable STEERING
In the free and united Scandinavia, we will create a allnordiskt parliament. Parliamentarians, who will come from all over Scandinavia, will be selected by local personal qualities. Any party entity will not be needed. Parliament will be the legislature, with the right to pass all laws. Parliament should also have the power to approve the Senate's choice of leader for the Republic. It shall also have the power to censure by depositing the leader of the Republic on the situation so requires.

A system like the Swiss direct democracy will be introduced with the decision-making referendums, in order to further balance the top management, the Senate and the leader's power. A censure shall be held by referendum. A system similar to that of Switzerland, where citizens gather a sufficient number of signatures to be able to bring about a referendum.

To further strengthen the power of the people, the citizens, after completing his military service to keep their personal army weapons, equipment thereof, in homes. This will not be a problem in a stable national-socialist state with responsible citizens.

One can thus conclude that what we call the basic democratic rights would remain, even if today's political parties be abolished. As an alternative to today's parties were individuals, associations and social movements have the responsibility to push forward on policy issues and to support the referendums.

The National Socialist Senate would be the leading center of the National Socialist words (NSO). Senators would be chosen by an electoral commission, also recruited from the NSO. Senate members would then be approved by the elected Parliament before they took office. Senators would be selected from those who, through his life consistently distinguished itself by virtues of society in science, the military, and more. They would not be politicians.

The Senate would choose the leader of the Republic in a secret ballot. The senators were particularly looking for a person who has excelled in life, has undergone trials and has shown great initiative and good judgment in stressful situations. He would be of good solid character and considered incorruptible. He would not be too young, nor too old, that he would be younger than the aged senators who choose him. He would then take up his post after the allnordiska parliament approved him.

What we see here is that the authoritarian leadership of the Republic, the leader and the Senate, would not be politicians. They would all certainly come from NSO - be National Socialist members of the Order - but they were recruited directly from the community, from their positions in the civil administration, from companies, academic institutions and the Nordic military forces. In Parliament, politicians would naturally be found, but some game types that we see today, which makes careers within the parties and paid by them would not be.

We would then create a system where we had an authoritarian leadership, a National Socialist leader state while we guaranteed homey freedom and participation. And apparently, it is thus possible to combine a strong government with the people's democracy. Things would end up in the right order, things would fall into place.

https://www.nordfront.se/framtidens-styre.smr Google-translated https

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 25th, 2013 at 12:44 PM.
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #15
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

A couple of more pieces by Klas Lund follows below:

A Nordic Front


By Klas Lund, 2012-05-31
[email protected]
Leader of the resistance movement

______________________________________________________________

This article by the Nordic resistance's leader, Klas Lund, addresses the Nordic peoples history and a quest for Nordic unity in the future. The article was recently published in number three of Finnish resistance movement's newspaper, Kansallinen vastarinta.

Finnish peers,

Nordic Resistance is currently organized in Finland, Sweden and Norway. We also strive to establish ourselves in the other Nordic countries. In Nordic Resistance fighters Nordic men and women together against the enemy that seems to destroy our countries. Nordic Resistance represents a united front of Nordic fighters who understand that the Nordic peoples unity is the only thing that can make us strong and independent.



A shared history

The Finnish and the Swedish people have a long common history. We have fought together in many wars. The part of Sweden where I have my home was inhabited as early as the Middle Ages of pimples. It cleared the forest, built new houses and worked in the forestry and mining industries. Their descendants today have Swedish names and speak Swedish. Maybe you know a lot of them do not even know that their ancestors once came from Finland. So it is in many places in Sweden, a significant part of the population have Finnish roots. Although many of the Swedish resistance movement members have Finnish roots. Similarly, many people have Swedish roots in Finland. Finns and Swedes have since time immemorial common. We are the sister country.

From a historical perspective, the relationship between the Swedes on the one hand and the Danes and Norwegians on the other side a bit more complicated. Sweden (and Finland) have often been at war with Denmark and Norway. But it has now been two hundred years since the last war.

Conflicts, injustice and betrayal in history can still help to create division among the Nordic peoples. One of these was the betrayal that Sweden did not come to the rescue of Finland during the war against the Soviet Union. Another that Sweden remained neutral when Denmark and Norway was occupied by Germany. Some ask themselves rightly, if we did not help each other then, why should we help each other today?

But memories of conflict and deceit should not stop us from struggling together today. After all, it was the then democratic regimes weakness and division that made the Soviets could attack Finland and Germany felt compelled to occupy Denmark and Norway to secure the Nordic front. It was the Nordic division and military weakness that caused the accident tomorrow. We had already been united and armed, the situation would be quite different. So we see that we are already at that time, had everything to gain from a united Scandinavia and it is this insight we should have as a guiding principle in our continued fight for the future.

Disagreement and division

The disagreement in the Nordic countries, the democratic system weakness and lack of vision has forced our people to conform to the great powers. Scandinavia's enemies had everything to gain by keeping Norden shattered and then spread the message to our respective countries are too small and too weak to stand alone, and that we must therefore be part of the stronger non-Nordic powers. By splitting and weakness policy has been able to get our people to voluntarily give up their independence and join the European Union, bowing to Soviet demands, sought the support of the U.S. and become the vassal to NATO.

It is the present political system and our thoroughly corrupt politicians who have led us here, which led us to a situation where our people are being dissolved and mass immigration rinses freely across our borders. This policy undermines the Nordic peoples grave. Parts of Sweden are already destroyed, Finland is just a few steps behind. We must draw the right lessons from the past to secure the future. Now we have to fight for survival Scandinavia.

We must defend ourselves and fight for our racial and cultural survival - in a world dominated by multicultural powers in our environment, the EU, Russia, the U.S. and the growing threat from China.

If we want to control our own destiny, we must join together and fight hard to liberate us and to build a united and strong Nordic state. Splintered, all our countries to remain slave states during the great powers and slowly fade away. The only intelligent and rational we can do in such a situation, when everything is at stake, is to get together and jointly coordinated the fight for freedom and survival.

National Socialism

Nationalists in the Nordic countries have not seriously put forward the idea of ​​a united Scandinavia. Here nationalism rooted in each people's history and memories of wrongs with more allowed to be an obstacle that prevented us from getting to the only sensible conclusion and consistently act accordingly.

Nordic Council of Resistance is a national socialist organization. The movement can be said to have its roots in nationalism and socialism. But the resistance movement has its roots in nationalism does not mean that the movement defends the existing nation-states in the North. The national mind Resistance stands for should not be confused with bourgeois nationalism. Nor is socialism Resistance stands for the same mixed with Marxism.

The Nordic peoples history is for us not a story of kings and other gentry, instead of the working people struggle for survival, freedom and development throughout history. National Socialism sees the nation and its resources as the people's common property. A worker has no obligation to be loyal to a nation that exploits him or advantages nation's resources unfairly. For us, the class struggle throughout history been mainly top down, not the reverse. It has been the rich who have taken advantage of the poor. The people have organized themselves and stood up against this oppression with justice. A hypocritical bourgeois nationalism, which historically has protected the wealthy classes' interests and defended Christianity, have contributed greatly to the working class has been driven away from the main tank and induced rejection of loyalty to his people and supported the Marxism.

The bourgeois nationalism hang on the nation-state idea and refuse to adapt to new conditions or to set new goals. It is reactionary and lacks vision. It is absolutely the wrong way to try to go back or just keep what we already have. Instead, we need the courage to go forward. We must take the initiative and start attacking!

Nordic Resistance

To organize across borders has its difficulties. But if we can not overcome these difficulties and make sure what we have in common so have our people are not much of a future. We have already in the small to create a united and strong Nordic countries we shall create in the large.

But despite the difficulties outweigh the benefits, disadvantages by far. One of these advantages is the necessary creation of a new vision, faith in - and fight for - a revitalized and united Scandinavia. We can persuade people to see the strength of our vision and instill new hope and new will-to-fight. Our struggle for a united Scandinavia förbrödrar also our people because we get closer to each other at a difficult time easier and see how much we have in common. We give each other strength.

Even in the little we are already seeing great benefits. Cross-border cooperation gives Nordic Resistance access to a larger pool of talented fighters. For example we might distribute tasks in specialist areas beyond national borders.

Although the Nordic countries have a lot in common, there exist some historical, cultural, political and economic differences. Each country has its peculiarities, therefore we do not go exactly the same approach but adapt to the conditions that exist in each country. But the spirit and the goal always remains the same.

Finnish peers: Never let anything divide us. We have to stick together, no matter what happens. Let us learn from the mistakes of the past. Unity is strength and is our only path to victory and freedom. Without unity of thought and action, neither the Finnish, Swedish or Norwegian people a future.

Nordic Resistance practicing the message we share. With us, the Nordic countries are already united and strong!

All for the North!


https://www.nordfront.se/en-nordisk-front.smr Google-translated https

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 25th, 2013 at 11:27 AM.
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #16
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

To free oneself from Sion


By Klas Lund
[email protected]
Leader of the resistance movement

______________________________________________________________

Friedrich Nietzsche wrote, "What does your conscience? - You will be what you are. " But who are we really, deep down? Can we hear our "inner voices" whisper or the modern world, with its cities, its engineering and with all their noise, long ago relegated these "inner voices" to silence exile? Have our true "I" soaked in stress, television viewing, rock music and restaurant life? And when we are no longer able to listen to ourselves, must we not listen to the strange voices that lead us astray?

William Pierce said of William Gayley Simpson (1892-1991) that he had served as a "vital force true servant." Simpson was a man who lived his 99 years long life in a selfless endeavors, initially for "God" and "humanity", later to breed and its future heir; superman.

In contrast to the oförstörde Parsifal, which in his youth left his isolated forest to follow the "nature and their innermost desires," Simpson had since childhood was certainly shaped by his Christian environment. Therefore, he had also made the logical choice for a young Christian man with a strong passion for social justice, he had become a priest. But he soon had become deeply disillusioned and forsaken priest vocation. Instead, he had chosen to live as a laborer in the mines and steel mills in order to be able to "share the workers 'burden'. If this and more Simpson writes in his thousand-page monumental work Which Way Western Man '.

He writes that during this period had read a book about the canonized Fransiskus of Assisi (1181-1226), founder of the Franciscans, whose monks lived the poverty ideal. Deeply affected, he had begun life as a friar and socialist agitator in the mostly black urban slums, where he assisted the poor and excluded people best he could.

For seven years he had lived in this self-denial, but ultimately he had been arrested by serious doubts. Something deep inside had told him that it was not enough merely "a good heart and a good will."

Why had he "settled down in the gutter just because others were already there"? Why would a talented and altruistic man wasting his life and his destiny for a goal that no longer felt noble or right? What did a light being voluntary in slums quicksand equal misery?

It was the German philosopher Nietzsche's relentless, but in many cases, perceptive, assault on the Christian religion and morality, which ultimately had issued the decisions in the battle that had been fought in Simpson's interior.
He had risen from the gutter, thrown off the hooded cloak and left the slums, never to return. When he later life thought back to that time, he would say: "... the Christian compassion folly. It is a crime against life in the higher sacrificed for the lower. "

Simpson was an idealist, the kind of person who really needed to know what was right, and act accordingly. He had therefore experienced the loss of their faith as if he has fallen into an "abyss". But he had also been released, from a spiritual despotism and a distorted thinking, which had enslaved the Aryan peoples minds for more than a thousand years. Slowly but surely he began to reevaluate everything. He had pondered, studied and searched for the truth, and afterwards, he had begun to see the world in a completely different light. He writes that it had been a difficult time, but that he had put "truth in front of peace of mind, and integrity in front of the public recognition and public opinion."

By this time he had also begun to feel a stronger distaste for cities and for the "modern civilization" and had begun intensely crave out "to the wilderness, the mountains and the sea." He wanted to get away from the modern world, and just like Knut Hamsun he might have instinctively known that the Aryan man could only survive by rejecting the modern ideals and to return to a way of thinking and living that reunited man with nature and the cosmos.

A good friend had helped him buy an isolated farmhouse in the Catskill Mountains. "Like a wounded animal seeking privacy", he writes, he wanted "to have solitude, and silence, and contact with the earth and the mountain plains." And like Isaac in Hamsun's work "crop land" he had through painstaking work built a new life . In this place, his spirit recover and here he would live the rest of his life. Here he could in quiet peace ponder over things and write down words of wisdom for the breed future generations. Here, where the nights still got really dark and let him stand under a starry canopy, away from the stifling metropolis with its artificial light, its asphalt and all those "City Glowing Jews" as Robert Mathews, one of his disciples, had called them . Here, Simpson could eventually become who he really was.

To follow his destiny

If we choose to experience the world only with our five senses, we must, as biological creatures, that we live in a world where life is constantly forced to fight to the death. On every square inch of land fighting small creatures a seemingly eternal and merciless struggle for survival. Are we just biological machines, which are struggling for survival and power in a world whose only real and true law is to kill and eat or be killed and eaten? Are ideals and morals only abstract but higher meaning, whose sole purpose is to regulate societies life? The existential issues are myriad, but despite this, the ultimate meaning of things remain incomprehensible.

Simpson took the mystic's position and said that some understanding could only be achieved through contemplation, inspiration or intuition, and despite the testimony of our five senses of the world's material form, Simpson was convinced that there also existed a "higher" reality, an incomprehensible fate , far beyond our comprehension. A metaphysical reality we could see glimpses of if we developed our "mind's eye", an additional sense. But only glimpses of the higher, because Simpson did not think it was possible for a man to reach full "enlightenment." He argued that "no one, not even the greatest mystic ... found himself face to face with" God, "with the universe revealed abyss equal reality" and that we would be destroyed if we had to experience this higher reality without the "filter".

If you can "see" things, can you also "hear", "feel" and "know" the metaphysical? Who, or what, is it that gives some of us these visions, as we "speak" with which we "sense" the presence of? Of course it is not "God", but perhaps it is the part of us that could belong to the metaphysical world, the spirit. Simpson used the term daimon which is Greek and refers to a spiritual being. For Socrates was daimonion a person's "inner voice", her "conscience." And our Nordic ancestors called this phenomenon hamingja or fylgia, which was considered a being tied to the Norns, the weaving human fates. In his work Die Grundlagen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts writes Houston Stewart Chamberlain:

"Nothing is as convincing as the consciousness of being of Ras. The man belonging to a distinctive, clean race, never loses the feeling of it. His ättelinjes guardian angel is always by his side and give him support when he loses his footing, warning him like the Socratic daimonen when he is in danger of wandering astray, commands him to obedience and forces him to data which otherwise he would never dare attempt because they are considered impossible. "

Simpson said that a man must listen to their inner daimon in order to fulfill his destiny. And especially important has it been to breed leaders and heroes to follow the path that the Socratic daimonen has marked out, and act in harmony with the Simpson calls "the heartbeat of the universe." Testified not August Kubizek, Hitler's childhood friend, if such a thing when he was in his book Adolf Hitler, Mein Jugend Freund says:

"I wanted to ask him, 'Where are you going?' But his pale face looked so forbidding out that I suppressed the issue.
Adolf climbed to the top of Freinberg as if he were driven by an unseen force. And only then I realized that we were no longer alone in the dark, the stars shone clear above us.

Adolf stood in front of me, and grabbed my hands and held them firmly. He had never made such a gesture before. I felt through his grasp how deeply touched he was. His eyes were feverish with excitement. The words were not flowing from his mouth as they usually did, but rather broke up, hoarse and rough. In his voice, I could hear more than how much this experience had shaken him.

Gradually eased his speech, and the words flowed more freely. Never before and never again have I heard Adolf Hitler speak as he did that hour when we stood alone under the stars, as if we were the only creatures in the world. I can not reproduce every word my friend uttered. I was struck by something strange, which I had never noticed before, not even when he spoke to me in moments of great excitement. It was as if another being spoke through his body, and touched him as much as it touched me. It was not a case of a speaker who was carried away by his own words. On the contrary, I felt rather as if he himself listened with astonishment to what burst forth from him with elementary force. "

It is understandable that Christianity, this Semitic "slave religion" as Nietzsche called it, explained these beings, these so-called demons, "evil." Instead of listening to these "evil" beings, our Race, deaf and blind, follow the Israelite shepherd and led astray.

Simpson came to share Carl Gustav Jung's notion that Christianity was a religion that had arisen in "Rome's sewers" and that it was a spiritual "infection" from the Levant who first had infected the Romans and then our Germanic ancestors. For Simpson, like Nietzsche, Christianity represented a revaluation of all Aryan values ​​and therefore was basically an anti-Aryan religion. It was a strange idea that had broken down the affected Aryans spiritual resilience and turned them into slaves of Zion.

Simpson hoped instead, with all his heart, to a new Aryan religion would be created with the old Aryan myths and scriptures as a basis; The ancient Indian script statute book, the Mahabharata and the Vedas, the ancient Persian hero myths and Avesta, the ancient Greek Iliad and Odyssey, The Celtic and Anglo-Saxon legends of Arthur and Beowulf, the ancient German Nibelungenlied, the Norse sagas and the Edda. These combined with the lyrics of the great Aryan thinkers from antiquity to our own time, with the stories of our ancestors' heroic deeds and battles, would create a new "Life Book". A priceless Bible for the Aryan peoples who would help guide us and give us strength for the journey "through the fire and the night" that awaits us.

Downfall and rebirth

What was it for a "fire" and a "night" that awaited us? What did Simpson about the future?

Simpson believed that technological civilization was a manifestation of the Aryan man's "determination to master time, space and nature." This titanic creative power would help our race to reach a higher understanding and assist us in our evolutionary trek. But worn from its true roots had the Aryan creative power, combined with the Jewish capitalism spawned a runaway, satanic, "growth" that consumed Mother Earth with an accelerating voracity.

Our "master blacksmiths" created increasingly sophisticated technology only to hand it over in the hands of a humanity that is increasingly less suited to handle it. Simpson noted that the modern world created "better and more efficient machines - but poorer and meaner people." And that technological developments while still went ahead, but that "what counts the most, in all the things that really matter, we have gone back and down."

He suspected that the current degenerative developments could not be stopped but must be allowed to run its course to the logical and disastrous end. And had not himself Oswald Spengler predicted that our technological civilization would one day lie in ruins, forgotten, just as the ancient extinct civilizations? Would not this modern Babylon continue their journey high towers to the sky for a little while, and then fall forever, in a final storm of fire and steel?

From such a perspective had the historical development passed the time when normal political changes were a realistic option. The only important thing was that the race would survive this upcoming Ragnarok. And do not be such a disaster even necessary for life would go ahead and evolution to continue? There was not even necessary that the world would be renewed through a global conflagration? Was it not better that the old slyet and weeds were burned in an overgrown and neglected garden before the new spring sunbeams reopen vegetation to germinate and sprout?

From Simpson's point of view was probably all that logical. Over Man could not be born in mass human society, because she was the flower that were forced out of the weeds. Like the disaster cleared away the dinosaurs would mass man removed to make way for a new cycle time and an evolutionary leap into the unknown. After the conflagration, a new golden age born, where Lif and Liftrasir could give life to a new generation.

"I myself feel second nature to our raft (or whatever we may call it) with everything we've got on board, need to go over Niagara Falls. And what can survive it, is the question. "He writes. But how this would go over, we had to get back on his feet now and regain our health and strength to thus be able to gain control of our own destiny and our "raft" before falling over the edge. And who knows, this might be us, maybe we could even turn the impending disaster to the JRR Tolkien called for a eukatastrof - a sudden, unexpected and violent change for the better.

Simpson writes that the enemy's stranglehold around our neck would not relax until we broke its grip.

"I am not a man of violence of nature, but there is one thing that scares me more than the violence and its consequences, and it is thought that our people may not come to rise up and throw off the death grip that thrust upon them." he writes.

The very title of Simpson's book, Which Way Western Man?, Highlights our ödesval. Whatever we choose, we can not escape our fate. Either we are passive and wait for a time or so we refuse to accept the "hopeless situation" and will continue the fight to victory or ruin. For "only the person who has given up hope - is lost," as Hans-Ulrich Rudel put it. Simpson preferred undoubtedly the last option. He even believed that if our Race after all perished in the "atomic age Ragnarok" it would be at least something that was worth respect, something titanium base and reverend - a tragic ending that was worthy of our noble race. And it would be much worse if we slowly died, rotted away, as degenerate zeros, sinking spirit back into the dark urvällingen - without a fight.

We must not forget that we are the descendants of the mightiest war arras the world has ever seen. We may be corrupted by the poison from Sinai and the weakening of the good times, and we may have against us huge crowds led by Zion evil. But what does it help them when Thor throws his hammer again and Odysseus uses all his cunning?

We will prevail and we will bring our mauled "raft" to an unknown, but safe beach. This was William Gayley Simpson convinced, and on this we must also believe.

https://www.nordfront.se/att-befria-sig-fran-sion.smr Google-translated https

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; August 25th, 2013 at 11:45 AM.
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #17
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

A warning from times past


By Klas Lund
[email protected]
Leader of the resistance movement

______________________________________________________________

"Those who only want to live a comfortable life, he does not deserve to be." This quote by Oswald Spengler, I come across when I scroll in Professor Herman Lundborg's (1868-1943) revival writing Occident in danger from 1934. This quote sums up the way the scripture message: That our material wealth and our frivolity could lead to our downfall.

Herman Lundborg was a professor of racial biology and director of the National institute for racial biology in Uppsala. This was at a time when our country is still, to some extent, seemed to be controlled by men who are concerned about the people and the culture's future. A time when significant men and women in our country still, open, able to defend our people and rasintressen without the risk of being subjected to witch hunts of the politically correct mob within government and media, accused of the worst thought crimes of all: Racism and Anti-Semitism .

Race degeneration

Lundborg defined eugenics as "the study of families', peoples and races life and development" and the West in danger was a warning letter to the then generations about the dangers of rasurartning, and the expected effect, as he judged them.

The term race degeneration meant Lundborg the negative process that leads to a race gradually deteriorates until it is no longer able to develop or even maintain previous generations of high culture. This degeneration is the first room biological and due to a depletion of a people's good genes. The reasons for this negative process are numerous, but the development of modern, industrial and emancipated society has contributed greatly to rasurartningen. Some reasons are as nuclear disintegration of the family and the modern urban man's unwillingness to breed enough children. The result has been that the carriers of good genes, under modern conditions, having fewer children than those with less talent, or merely that the people languishing through a falling birth rate and a backward evolutionary development time.

Another more serious form of degeneration, according to Lundborg, is when a superior peoples rasblandar with inferior races, thereby threatening the very foundations of the higher race existence.

Too good conditions hasten the decay process and Lundborg wrote that: "People are dying, because it was convenient for living." There are many examples in history where this has happened. The prime example is supposed to be the Roman Empire, the decline and fall.

Attempts were made while the blonde autocrats Caesar and Augustus and others, through policy reforms to prevent degeneration and thereby avoiding their original Nordic Romans died out. But their actions were not powerful enough in the fight against contemporary frivolity and greed. The import of slaves from Asia and Africa came to be so extensive that over ninety percent of the population of Rome at the end of Asian descent. It was a demographic catastrophe that did not escape the contemporary satirist Juvenal, when he stated that: "These dregs call themselves Greeks, but how few of them are really Greeks; river Orontes [in Syria] has long flowed into the Tiber." Raiders of profit ; slave imports, prosperity, comfort and ultimately devastating war, ended the Romans. "So it has gone with the older culture of people that we read about in history. They have committed racial suicide, "wrote Lundborg.

Decay symptoms

In the West in danger counted Lundborg up a number of general symptoms of the degeneration could manifest itself in a modern society. He wrote, among other things, that the cities "to grow briskly and depopulation of the countryside, little by little." In large cities, "dissolve increasingly family ties and this trend spreads (as a kind of contagion) to other parts of the country."

Despite external prosperity flag "birth rate" so much so that "people rat numbers subside." The number of abortions, according to Lundborg "abortions for criminal purposes", is increasing dramatically. Urban growth and the low birth rate leads to importation of aliens in increasing quantities. Lundborg wrote further that: "Individualism takes over. Individuals are becoming more selfish and lose the understanding that it is their duty to work for the state and its future. "Morality and Religion" into disrepute. Immorality, dishonesty and crimes is increasing. " Self Mordens "number is increased."

According to Lundborg'd habitat improvement "in the beginning" and "average life expectancy increases" but to chronic and degenerative diseases, in spite of this - would increase. He wrote that: "There arises an increasing desire for stimulating and numbing agents such as alcohol, tobacco, morphine, opium, cocaine, sleeping pills and other toxic drugs." Abuse "is increasingly common" and "attempts to thwart the misery Strand". He wrote further that: "Luxury and mammondyrkan propagate, first in the higher social layers, then in the lower."

Large urban decadence

The modern rasurartningens root causes can be traced to industrialization and capitalism search of profit. In modern society, where the guiding principle is "economic growth", grows huge industrial and trading center bigger and bigger. Lundborg described the cities as capitalist "cancerous" whose constant growth was in constant need of new folk material from the living countryside. He wrote that the cities' suck sooner or later to all the must and pith from the people and thereby kill it. "

The rural areas are as a people grow and thrive; born, dies and is reborn. This circuit applies to people as well as animals and crops. Peasant agriculture, animal husbandry and healthy culture through the generations also creates the conditions for human survival and development.

Lundborg found that people in big cities, because of the unnatural life, which is in constant extinction due to a low birth rate and that the cities therefore could only continue to grow by impoverishing rural areas. He cited German Lotze who wrote: "The big cities literally engulf the people. They attract hundreds of thousands of people and destroyed them. These cities gives the impression of primitive power, gloss and relentless progress but in fact the endless cemeteries. In Berlin, we already have a voice keeping, where two cradles meet five coffins. "

In modern society, large cities have been swallowed up most of the rural population can not depopulated the countryside longer supply the ever-growing metropolis with enough human material. This, wrote Lundborg, could in the future lead to: "voids, which thus occur within the country, replenished by immigration from other countries. There will be an influx of low standing, yes often inferior folk elements of culture people regarded as 'barbarians' or ruthless and undesirable 'parasites'. Racial mixtures between entirely unlevel people arise and have adverse effects. "

National Socialism

To Lundborg was a National Socialist, there is no doubt, and in the Scriptures he quotes Hitler describes in positive terms the National Socialist German political reforms in eugenics area.

Lundborg's views were radical and in some areas Spartan grim. He believed that the degeneration could only be tackled through eugenic measures. To this end, it took far-reaching political reforms in many areas. That the state would create incentives to encourage families to have more children, he considered to be of utmost importance. His most controversial proposal was that the government would resort to forced sterilization of "dregs" of society. But Lundborg also suggested that community, for this purpose, must be changed in the large. He found, inter alia, that: "Industry, Trade and Banking" should not "be an end in itself but merely a means to the good of the people." And that "we have certainly not afford to let the industry grow uncontrollably, even though it brought us billions, for throughout our vitality and future of independent people is at stake. " Economic life was strictly regulated by the state. Luxury goods would in most extent excluded from the domestic market and ideally only produced to from foreign countries to trade for necessities. The fact that Sweden would follow the "subsistence" principle he saw as obvious. The country's natural resources as "woods, metals, and water power" should be used sparingly for future generations. Lundborg said that the regions in the country that was too industrialized would gradually de-industrialization by the State. Necessary industries and universities be relocated to smaller towns where workers and students were not exposed to large urban decadence and proletarianization.

At least 75 percent of the population would "perform physical labor" and he said that these were "the core of the population" and that they do not degenerate as easy as "intellectually educated urbanites".

Herman Lundborg loved his people and his political views was founded in the desire to preserve the Nordic race. He realized that prosperity, democracy, materialism would eventually lead to degeneration, arbitrariness and tyranny. His proposals for political reform was therefore long and thoughtful and was intended to protect future generations.

Lundborg wrote that he was convinced that many of his policy proposals would be considered folly of the then highly individualistic people. But he still hoped that this "foolishness" would eventually be accepted because it was absolutely necessary.

Today's decline

The degeneration Lundborg warned was only the prelude to what we are now witnessing all around us, sixty years after the Second World War and more than seventy years after Lundborg gave his revival writing. We now live in Racial and kulturförstörelsens age. It is from the power elite forced the introduction of "multiculturalism" as part of the effort to dismantle the nations, will eventually, if unchecked, will lead to our destruction. Language, music, literature, habits, ways of thinking - everything is statt of violent change.

We have long since passed the point where the degeneration was still only a process, driven forward by people's short-sightedness and the modern industrial society's negative side effects. Today the society and breed knowingly towards the precipice of forces which, through degeneration gained momentum and eventually come to dominate the political, economic and cultural life of the West. Our country is governed in practice by an aggressive and unholy coalition of political grafters, Zionists, bastards and gays who openly through the media and by political reforms, attacking everything that seemingly represent the "heteronormative" society's lingering "förtryckarstrukturer". In megalomanisk destructiveness are on your way to transforming our once free and clean Sweden to a borderless territory cosmopolitan and multicultural MELTINGPOT.

Since Lundborgs time, the world has also grown with the addition of four billion, more or less colored, democracy aspirants. While we ourselves have become fewer. From having dominated the world, the Nordic race since 1945 ödesåret weakened so severely that several women now represent only a few percent of the world's women of childbearing age. Not only this, a veritable army of reformers; United Nations, Doctors Without Borders and missionaries, doing their best to the other must be even more. The Nordic race, creator of the amazing technology that is at all made it possible for the colored masses to be so many, is disappearing into a dark storm surge.

The Future
Degeneration is a very real phenomenon and it must also have very serious consequences. So far kept our present civilization, despite degeneration, alive through the modern technology achievements. But this can only be an artificial respiration with mechanical engineering where science will soon not be enough to keep the chaos away. The prosperity and the rapid technological developments have created a reliance on technological opportunities, which has led to people seem to assume that it is possible to violate the laws of nature forever. The truth, however, is the fact that we live in an overpopulated world where a brutal battle for dwindling natural resources will soon be felt.

The economic wheels in the West could soon stop spinning and then waiting much harder times. Despite this, most people walk around during the big city of light, artificial light completely unaware of this future. Modern society as we become accustomed to it, with its liberalism and its luxury, will disappear. This may sound incredible to those who have grown up in prosperity and peace, but soon, the consequences of degeneration come: first tyranny and poverty, then probably chaos, wars, famine and eventually mass death - this is nature's way of punishing those who wronged her laws.

Final words

If we want our Race to live, we must take up the struggle against the destructive forces that now control our country. Such a struggle is to achieve political struggle to conquer state power, to be able to implement what is necessary to ensure the survival and freedom. But we must not forget that this fight can not only be in the large, but also have to be in the small. Many people who profess to national ideals and even actively fights for them, while living their lives in accordance with the modern liberal ideals. Ideal which is diametrically opposite the man claims to stand for. This is perhaps partly because of the perception that only after "victory" top can implement such radical changes in politics - that life will approach political ideals. However, this is dangerous thinking!

Our Race must survive whether we conquer the national government or not. It is therefore reasonable that the following is considered the minimum required by the nationally conscious young men and women:

The men must fight. They need to organize themselves and submit to the discipline in an organization where they can do the most good. Men must also form healthy stable families. The women have to give birth and take care of the home. They must also ensure that the men have time to fight. Each national conscious woman must give birth to three children, preferably more. These children have to be raised healthy and protected from the vast cultural transformation that pervades modern society. The biggest mistake parents can make is to relax in the upbringing of the children. Upbringing of children is the family's main job!

Lundborg wrote that it is the men's overriding duty to defend the people against its enemies, and the women's "duty to ensure that people do not die out of lack of defenders and through degeneration."

If this is considered "sectarian" or "obsolete" so one can only respond: If we do not do this, then our Race to extinction. And if you think this is too much pressure on you, you can only conclude that you do not belong to the pure core of viable Teutons who intend to fight for their right to life and liberty, but you are perhaps instead the enslaved, wretched, mass is doomed to disappear from history.

https://www.nordfront.se/en-varning-...unna-tider.smr Google-translated https
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #18
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

Frequently Asked Questions


By Klas Lund
[email protected]
Leader of the resistance movement

______________________________________________________________


When our activists are out selling this newspaper on the streets meets the many people who ask questions about our struggle. This article lists some of the common issues, both those absurd and more normal.

What is Swedish culture?

This question tries to argue that there is no Swedish culture, that everything good comes from outside, or alternatively, that the author does not actually know what "Swedish culture" means.
The question reveals, in fact, the existence of a deep ignorance of the questioner for its own people, its history and culture. How can a man who grew up as part of a people have such a lack of understanding of himself and his environment? It's like questioning the very air we breathe and assert that it is not there, just because it is ubiquitous, sublime and always have been for anything obvious.
In short, the question reveals the author as a very ignorant person - without knowledge or understanding of its own people.

Why should the Swedish people survive?

Or alternatively: Why should the white race survive? This is an existential question of absurdity.

A healthy animal to fulfill its mission in the world, according to their instincts and never question the foundations of their existence or if its actions are "right or wrong". The problem with humans is that in her reasoning often based on what she had learned from others instead of listening to his instincts. While this is an indispensable attribute of man, but it also means that she can easily fall prey to unnatural alien ideas. But when it has gone so far that a person no longer instinctively understand that their own kind to live, it may be a sign of biological degeneration.

A counter question would be: Why are you [the questioner] survive? Why should your family, your friends, your children, your girlfriend survive?
There is of course no difference if you were to ask a Jew: Why should the Jewish people survive? Or why should the Indians survive, or why are Tibetan or Italian culture consist? Why should we preserve Leonardo da Vinci's paintings, or Bach's music? Why should we preserve the Pyramids, the Leaning Tower of Pisa, the Notre Dame Cathedral and Stonehenge?

What are you resisting?

An issue such as this would actually have a very long answer, but we make ourselves short: We fight against all that harms our people. We are a resistance movement that is in the struggle against the forces that consciously or unconsciously seeks to destroy our race and the western civilization and culture it has created. We are resisting a regime that rejected all popular national and racial ideals, which serves only materialism, Mammon and shortsightedness. We are resisting a regime governed by Zionism's tentacles. We resist the anti-culture that spread, mainly from the U.S., as part of the Zionist-capitalist attack on the world's different cultures.

Are you racist?

We are racialist. Each race / people have the right to follow their own destiny, to develop and create culture and society along its own nature. Every people has a natural given the right to defend their territory and their individuality.

It is a fact that mankind consists of several breeds that differ significantly in terms of both external and internal characteristics. We turn a blind eye to these biological differences, but follow the laws of nature and takes into account the great differences that exist and that are crucial to the historical trend. We protect our own kind and fights against miscegenation and cultural destruction (multiculturalism) and defending our people's fundamental rights.

Are you Nazis?

The resistance movement committed to the National Socialist worldview. National Socialism is based on nature's revealed laws and represents a philosophy diametrically opposed to the now prevailing world order.

National Socialism is "based on an infinite love of creation in all its diversity, a deep, unconditional respect for the wisdom of nature and an intense desire to preserve life as it has grown from this wisdom." National Socialism is an inclusive learning that not only recognizes the man as part of nature, but also can provide answers to all the basic questions of life. In fact, the National Socialism mankind's only hope for survival in a world that is moving towards its destruction by rasdegeneration, overpopulation, pollution and chaos.

Would not more attracted by a softer message?

It would be safe. But we do not believe that one can achieve the power needed by the people - in order to implement the necessary changes in these last days - unless they are fully persuaded comprehend what is at stake. Too powerful forces working against us so that we can achieve victory by compromising on fundamental truths. There are no shortcuts, or any convenient option, only a hard uncompromising struggle.

The Aryan peoples will only get one chance, and once we get the chance we have to act with full force, in full consciousness, and this can not happen if our supporters do not understand the big picture. At fighters should be no lingering doubts or distorted humanism or liberalism. It may only be a fanatical will to act for the truth, and the breed's survival.

Are you right-wing?

Resistance does not recognize the existence of a left-right scale in the struggle for it, it is beyond such scale. Resistance to a struggle for the crucial existential questions and cares not for the present society everyday political problems. The fight for in the end, the National Socialist worldview complete victory and the creation of a new world order, diametrically opposed to the current one.

Is Resistance to Dictatorship?

The resistance movement fighting for the Nordic peoples freedom and survival. The Nordic race has always kept his personal liberty high and we intend to defend this freedom. We seek neither dictatorship and liberal democracy. What we seek is a stronger form of government, where the nation's leaders have real power to enforce it as necessary. A government that ensures that the best of people get into leadership position, instead of now, when our country is "governed" by mediocre puppets.

We have nothing in principle against the election or voting rights, provided that the people are properly informed before they make their choice, and not as now forced to see everything through the "Moses glasses."

Only a healthy, responsible and conscious people can be in the long run to maintain a free society and defend it from degeneration. No political system in the world can create freedom where the racial fundamentals are not there.

Why are you against the Jews?

World Judaism has a very big influence in the world - economically, culturally, religiously and politically.

If someone laughs at "the Jewish conspiracy thought" it should really be enough to show up a Bible for him and point out the fact that since thousands of years suffered under a religion which for some reason declares that the Jews are "God's chosen people," claims the "Son of God" is a Jew and that the same "God" promised the Jews dominion over the earth. A critical thinking person should ask how the Jews at all been able to get such a central role in a religion that has long held sway over European human life and death.

Ignoring the Jewish problem is a form of reality stricture, or an abysmal ignorance and ignorance. It is a fact that Jewish forces were deeply involved in such the French Revolution, World War I, the Russian Revolution and World War II.

Those who have eyes to see, he sees. It is a fact that forces with roots in Judaism is deeply involved in the culture war against Europe, including going out on to destroy the indigenous European cultures and replacing them with anti Americanized culture (multiculturalism).

The same forces behind European and Swedish open-borders policy, and has long pushed for mass immigration of rasfrämmande elements.

We accuse those forces have foiled the West's natural organic development since antiquity and for their subversive influence created a historical development that can only be described as deeply tragic.

It is a fact that the Aryan race will not survive another fifty years for these forces domination.

You seem to be against feminism, you are misogynistic?

Socialism was a necessary reaction during industrialization. Women's emancipation, as represented by women Fredrika Bremer, can also be regarded as necessary. But just like Sion created Marxism and incited class hatred and class war pursued instead of class solidarity, so they also exploited the woman question to obtain fragmentation, rather than understanding. From a racial perspective, feminism and women's modern ideals of life is a disaster. Instead of starting a family, and raising children and building a home, they prefer working life and see it as something more desirable. The birth rate is falling and the children born brought up no longer in a satisfactory way, because the woman no longer sees her mother's role as a major task.

We will not compromise on this issue, no matter how much feminism has penetrated the public consciousness. We believe that the woman's first and noblest mission is to be the parent, raising children and taking care of everything related to it. This does not mean that we want to force any woman to do anything she does not want, or to prevent her from being free to choose how she will live her life, but only to a healthier ideal woman should permeate society so that most women choose a more natural living.

With that said, it should be added that we put at least as much attention to the men, on the other hand, with their natural duties as men, the most important is their participation in the fight to secure our nation's future.

What is your ideal society look like?

We are opposed to the present secular capitalist consumer society, and the struggle to create a national socialist society. We believe that the present society only held together by money, that lyxkonsumtionen corrupts our people, destroy our natural habitat and involves a theft from future generations.
We want to create a racially homogeneous society where people live in harmony with nature and the cosmos. We want to create a society in which people no longer have a need for false religions, where they live by what the laws of nature teaches. We want to create a community that supports breed evolutionary development and aspiring thousands of years. A society free from toxins and pollution, which utilizes natural resources and conserve them for future generations. We are convinced that the Aryan man, which is located on the top of evolution, reached such a high level of awareness that it is possible to realize, and the creation of such an organic, timeless society, and to consciously strive to achieve higher consciousness and form .

Recommends you armed struggle? Why are you violent?

We are a civil disobedience movement. We are not advocating armed struggle, but not for that it would be morally reprehensible, but because it is not practical, and that we still have basic freedoms in this country that allows a legal approach. We believe that we should examine all other possible avenues, before you take up arms.

The organization can be understood as violent as most of our active members are young men who are not afraid to confront enemies on the streets. We believe we have a fundamental right to spread our message across Sweden, of all places in the country. Our activists will eg able to sell this newspaper openly in the streets without being chased away by political enemies. This often leads to fights and confrontations. Our members train because martial arts, etc. to more effectively defend our right to freedom of expression, association and assembly.

I'm from Belgium, I go with you?

Resistance fighters for the Swedish people's survival - its territorial, cultural and racial integrity. But Resistance is also a National Socialist organization, not a narrow nationalist organization, without striving in the large for the Aryan race best and the National Socialist universal worldview victory, even if we as Swedes to fight on a national level and from a national perspective.

All the people of Aryan European origin, ie. they might be considered members of the white race, are welcome to become members as long as they do not seem foreign (non-Nordic) interests or ideals.

Resistance Movement believes that the Nordic countries, the Nordic race exclusive territory, although for pragmatic reasons we can accept a limited assimilation of non-Nordic white racial elements.

If a person of alien race, or of mixed race, we can accept it as a support member, provided that the person in their living following fundamental National Socialist principles.

https://www.nordfront.se/vanliga-fragor.smr Google-translated https
 
Old August 25th, 2013 #19
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Default

National Socialism and the reactionary nationalism


By Klas Lund
[email protected]
Leader of the resistance movement

______________________________________________________________

This article was previously published in Attack! No. 8 of 2010. Attack! is an internal member bulletin intended for Resistance activists and published 12 issues per year.

National Socialism and nationalism may be related, but very different national socialism from what we usually mean by nationalism. These differences, which are far from clear to everyone, is essential for a victorious battle. I do not intend in this article attempt to define these differences without thinking rather try to describe how the ideological confusion of these two currents of ideas inhibits the development of National Socialism to become a clear philosophy of our time and thus prevents it from becoming the force it could be.



Evolution is a necessity

You can say that life in the world survive by defeating death through rebirth miracle. The reproduction and evolution, life can overcome the omnipresent death. A life form that is unable to reproduce and evolve is doomed to extinction. Some organisms have a very short life while other organisms, from our perspective, living a very long life. These individual organisms are part of a larger life form, a race or species. This life principle can also be applied to ideas and worldviews as being the expression of the human races struggle for existence. For example, a worldview that fitted in India during the Bronze Age hardly be particularly suited to meet the contemporary needs of people and survive unchanged in today's world. The need for evolutionary development is also the National Socialist worldview.

"It was better before"

The reactionary nationalism means very much to try to hold on to old beliefs for the emergent new. The reaction is based on the notion that "it was better before" (something that is not always wrong because a certain reserve for changes in many cases it may be sensible as far away from all the changes are a good thing). But the main problem of the reaction is probably that it is inherently defensive, defending the past and the enduring and usually lack vision and a strong desire to change. If the reaction is allowed to define and dominate the ideological trend could these ideas to solidify the reactionary orthodoxy without a will or the means to change things that need changing. An example of reactionary nationalism is the excessive craze for making events and idealiserandet of people in the past. Of course we will honor their ancestors, but it must not be at the expense of the future. The past must never restrict future.

The will to change

Old customs and practices must be changed to suit new circumstances. And what is important is that this desire for change has to come from ourselves, not from without. If a school of thought dominated by reactionary forces, it will turn into just a cared for and the past and the desire for change is left to our enemies. We will then automatically a reactionary force that only defends his position against an external enemy who took the initiative and will continue to attack us until our defense breaks down. War can, as is known, only overcome by seizures. Armed only be used to fend off enemy attacks for you then should be able to attack. In our political / ideological "war" we win only by taking the initiative from the enemy and start pushing them back.



Renewal but faithful principles

We National Socialists understand that the new must always grow out of the old, just like life can only be passed from parents to offspring. Important in this context is that this even as in everything else, a balance, ie. The old is destined to give birth to the new, not stiffen and die, but that the new must be faithful to the old one. We must understand that the grand old oak tree that grew in a thousand years although it eventually die, and that the little insignificant plant that grows beside it represents the future when the thousand years have passed. We understand that innovation is necessary in the struggle for existence and thus we can never allow our National Socialist worldview to solidify in an old form. But we must also recognize that renewal must stay true to the principles, it must be true to their own nature.

Committing to the future

We Nazis are revolutionary unlike nationalists which basically is reactionary. We want to change society, and we have a vision of how the future society should look like. We can not let nostalgia for the past create ideological confusion. We National Socialists attack, we understand that the Swedish nation state that once existed will never exist and we do not intend to try to put into life-sustaining efforts to save something whose time has passed. Instead, we must, if we want our place to continue living, create a new vision of the future and then fight determinedly to its realization. As the National Socialist Revolutionaries we must look ahead, to the future - not constantly look back and lament what has been lost and will never return.

Clarity and consistency is strength

To National Socialism to become a viable worldview of our time, we need to cut ourselves off from the solidified nationalism, we must clarify. We must show that we are not tied to the past but is a part of something new and budding. The confusion between the revolutionary National Socialism and the reactionary nationalism has meant that we have lost a lot of valuable time and National Socialism still has not freed itself from this constraint. We must note that we can not reach full strength unless we first bring clarity and consistency. We must realize that the reaction has no future, but that we have a future and that therefore we can not allow the reaction to drag us into the abyss. Therefore, we must ruthlessly separate the reactionary thinking from our struggle.

We are building the future

The breed can survive only if it takes the initiative from our enemies, and start attacking on all fronts. We must embrace the future of ideas without for that matter become tainted or corrupt, but to bargain with our principles. We must understand that we can not stop anything until we have a fundamental worldview that may explain why. You could say that we need to separate our reactionary desire to stop the construction works and our revolutionary will to create their own works. To take a simple example: The reaction to stop the construction of a mosque in a city and we sympathize with this. But we must here understand that this fight is meaningless as long as the fight against this does not take as its starting point a world with its own vision of what should be built there in its place, an idea of ​​the future that can compete with, in this case, a doctrinaire and well-organized movement that is Islam. For without vision, what is the alternative if there are not built a mosque? Should the ground instead be used to build even a McDonalds or a gay bar? Without a strong and clear worldview resistance will always be too weak.

The confusion

The Nordic National Socialism inability to distinguish themselves from the reactionary nationalism has meant that much time has been lost. For as long as no one is clear about what really distinguishes Nazism from nationalism can no proper development of worldview happen, nor can any fundamental work carried out. In fact, it is the reactionary nationalism that has dominated the national socialism of the past 90 years in the Nordic countries and in such conditions has not been so much positive happening.

The reaction took over

This development can be traced back to 1920 - and the 30's when the National Socialist ideas first gained a foothold in the North. Unlike Germany, where Hitler and his men, trained in First World War trenches, came to designing the revolutionary and innovative National Socialism, was National Socialist ideas of the highly reactionary forces here in the North. One example was the admittedly good-hearted men around the wealthy Carl Ernfrid Carlberg and the publishers, the kingdom of Sweden, who came to dominate the intellectual development of contemporary national ideas in Sweden. As in Norway, Sweden had strong conservative, reactionary and Christian forces which mixed national socialism with bourgeois national mental legacy.

Christianity example

This confusion between national socialism and reactionary of thought has been throughout idéspektrumet, but Christianity can serve here as an illustrative example. The German National Socialists were indeed, for tactical reasons, careful to distance themselves from Christianity, even if everyone in the line was agreed that Christianity had no place in the future Nazi New Order. They had cherished the National Socialist doctrine in its totality and realized that Christianity was alien and fundamentally must be excluded from the national community, although this was considered must occur over a longer process in which particularly the youth was released from Christianity through science education. In Sweden there were such opinions, but there was never such a confident position among the leading national. And here we come to something important; During the same time struggling Social Democrats and others in Sweden to dechristianize the Swedish people - in the name of science - and the Swedish National Socialism made himself instead to the voice of a conservative position where it was suggested to want to preserve what they revolutionary forces seeking to abolish. What I want to say, with this it is apparent that National Socialism in Sweden never became a revolutionary force - it was heavily infiltrated by the reaction.

National Socialism not nationalism

In the same vein, these reactionary forces that it was important that the domestic "national socialist" ideology was rooted in the nation state. They made themselves anxious to verbally and in writing to assert its independence from the German variety. It's National Party led by NE Lindholm went so far that it changed its name from the NSAP to Swedish socialist collection. It was with this is no longer the National Socialists, it was Swedish socialists. The nation-state was for some reason that holy and ethnicity was more important than race in this state thought. We also see the tragic consequences of such thinking: that it instead was the Liberals who then fought for the idea of ​​a unified Nordic republic while Swedish national socialists were busy craze for royalty as Charles XII and celebrated an ethnic form of government that was directly inappropriate for future requirements.

Bastardization of ideology

It did not get better with National Socialism after the war. There was no willingness or ability of a discernment. Our national socialism which from the start had been mixed with reactionary nationalism came ago with the Judeo-American cultural imperialism that bastardiseras further by negative influences from there. The postwar period also led to the rise of nostalgic reactionaries who dreamed back to the Reich, etc. Because it is so no one has sorted out this ideological chaos that is the "national movement", no one has created any clarity, no one has tried to rid National Socialism and define it and clarify it, let alone put it into a real political context. Instead, we see that the petty-bourgeois elements all the time, from 1945 until now, compromised and tried to take shortcuts, shortcuts that could never lead anywhere. Meanwhile, the only idea that could lead us forward remained undeveloped like a precious plant in danger of suffocating in a tangle of weeds.

Reactionaries call themselves National Socialists

Even among those who call themselves National Socialists are the reactionaries. It's the people that excessive passion for the past, who can not let the old people stuck in the past of National Socialism external form and attributes. These people are by definition not National Socialists, although they believe it themselves. To worship the dead, while rejecting those who are now living and fighting must be counted as a National Socialist mortal sin.

National Socialism in time and space

National Socialism is a philosophy based on a number of true principles which are observed and established by men like Hitler, Rosenberg et al It is important to understand that we do not seek any "orthodoxy", we do not claim that everything will be as it was in the Third Reich. We are not the German NSDAP, nor are we in any way tied to their party platform. One of our main tasks should be to identify the basic principles that can tell whether the National Socialist plants and use them to further develop our time National Socialism. We must keep faithful to the inner truth of National Socialism and maintain that part of the doctrine that is necessary so that we do not stray us or become corrupt, but we must at the same time shaping national socialism to a powerful ideology in the present and in the future. It's certainly not an adjustment to the current anti-culture, or the weak public opinion without adapting to our time, to our geographical and geo-political and racial situation but we somehow mixes "of water in the wine." The goal remains the creation of a National Socialist State, but in our case it is not about restoring the Third Reich or any of its departments or external forms. Our goal is to create a Nordic national socialist republic.

Never too late to do the right

Unless the Swedes, Norwegians, Danes and Finns can be persuaded to see the bigger picture and not spasmodically continue to hold the nation-state concept and dead forms, we are doomed to lose, and our people will perish. Only the broad vision to create change and lead us to regain the initiative. For we can not only react, we can not do it, we must instead create future ideas and snatching away the initiative from our enemies. I have the "Future Governance" presented the basis for such a vision.

I conclude this article with Hitler's words:

"But right in the apparent hopelessness of our mighty struggle lies the greatness of our task and opportunity for success. Our war-cry that makes the little spirits weak in the knees or rigid with terror, becomes the signal that collects all real natures of struggle. "

https://www.nordfront.se/nationalsoc...ionalismen.smr Google-translated https
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 AM.
Page generated in 1.29749 seconds.