Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 16th, 2005 #1
Opie
Kinder & Gentler
 
Opie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 318
Default Question about your network

I'm really new here and just noticed this section. I have a question. Where will you broadcast this network? Shortwave? Or will you have a new website like RBN for the shows?

And is this in competition with Hal Turner's network? He's trying to comeback you know.
 
Old March 16th, 2005 #2
Subrosa
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Burning Down Indian Country
Posts: 6,185
Default We're going to offer Halvin a slot on the Network!

He can have a whole hour to get people to rally with their guns, or break out with news about a chinese Armada off the coast of California. He can play an echocardiogram on air to let us know he's still ticking, and he can ridicule his audience to his hearts content.

We'll charge him exactly what he charged others, 25 bucks an hour. Let's see, if Turnerstein buys one hour a night, that's 5 nights times...hold on let me thank...that's 125 a week. Now, we times that hmmm..let's see...hold on..thats...500 bucks month! He won't have any overhead, he won't need to go on the air begging, spitting and acussing for half of the show. Plus, if he can sucker the boys from Brazil into giving him 1000 a month for his show, he can make a tidy living off just being a blowhard.

Such a deal eh?!
 
Old March 16th, 2005 #3
SkinnyMonkey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Imagine a "White Radio Network". Combine the skills of Vonbluvens, Hal Turner, Frank Weltner, Kevin Strom and then throw in the Alex Linder show! There would be plenty of Paul Gellar types as well. Fill the empty slots with old Pierce ADVs and you've got a 24 hour Internet radio network with fresh content every day. You could pick through the archives at Solar General and have a mountain of content from day one. Check out: http://www.majoritynews.com/ - this is the work of one dedicated man. He never asked anyone for $10,000 in start-up costs, he just made it happen. Rather than reinventing the wheel every other month and wasting effort to develop Internet radio shows that have already been done, we should be thinking about unification.
 
Old March 16th, 2005 #4
Subrosa
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Burning Down Indian Country
Posts: 6,185
Default

Weltner has excellent Radio Presence. Bluvins and Turnerstein we could do without. We want people to tune in, not tune out.
 
Old March 16th, 2005 #5
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subrosa
Weltner has excellent Radio Presence. Bluvins and Turnerstein we could do without. We want people to tune in, not tune out.
I listened to Weltner a few times and thought he did a pretty good job. Bit of a softball approach for my tastes but still a good radio presence, as you said.

Then I heard he lives or lived with a jewish fag and I sorta lost interest.
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #6
Stan Sikorski
Returned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Upper midwest around cattle.
Posts: 3,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie
I'm really new here and just noticed this section. I have a question. Where will you broadcast this network? Shortwave? Or will you have a new website like RBN for the shows?

And is this in competition with Hal Turner's network? He's trying to comeback you know.
As I envision it, VNN will have a broadcasting network. This to me means that we will do Internet audio broadcast in live and and pre-recorded formats to start, and integrate video in the next phase. Shortwave is also a nice concept and I hope those with knowledge in shortwave broadcasting will come forth to lend a hand and take the initiative to make that delivery system possible for VNN content.

As ar as competing with HT, all I can ask is he even thinking of working to author content on a daily basis 24/7? I am.
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #7
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Sikorski
As I envision it, VNN will have a broadcasting network. This to me means that we will do Internet audio broadcast in live and and pre-recorded formats to start, and integrate video in the next phase..
Stan, is this actually gonna happen? I mean, has it progressed past the talking stages and will it shortly become reality?

The reason I'm asking is some VNN members have pledged money and I'd hate to think the money went for naught.
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #8
Stan Sikorski
Returned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Upper midwest around cattle.
Posts: 3,463
Default

I have just put online a server capable of live and prerecorded streaming media. I am instructing Alex in the purchasing of the hardware he needs on his end and protocall for recording and broadcasting content for the network.

I have also put out the call for further content to fill space on the network.

This is going to happen. Talking is still part off it as suggestions for content are a never-ending need. This doesn't happen overnight but once established will snowball. We can have pre-recorded Internet radio right now, but then we can go live, add video productions and become a 24/7 network in no time if we have the content to support it. Content ideas are our only slowing point. Concentrate on that.
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #9
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Sikorski
I have just put online a server capable of live and prerecorded streaming media. I am instructing Alex in the purchasing of the hardware he needs on his end and protocall for recording and broadcasting content for the network.

I have also put out the call for further content to fill space on the network.

This is going to happen. Talking is still part off it as suggestions for content are a never-ending need. This doesn't happen overnight but once established will snowball. We can have pre-recorded Internet radio right now, but then we can go live, add video productions and become a 24/7 network in no time if we have the content to support it. Content ideas are our only slowing point. Concentrate on that.
Ok Stan, thats good enough for me. I realize these things take time. I just thought that since you and Alex have the ability to put a show on right now maybe we should go with that and let the 24/7 network content take care of itself later down the line, as a 24 hour broadcast may be a little bit more than we can bite off at this time.

Lets get Alex up and running right now with a once or twice a week show that generates interest. After all, Alex is the guy everyone wants to hear and from there it will "snowball".

In spite of your talent and abilities Stan, you ain't Ted Turner will millions backing you. Lets take it a step at a time instead of trying to emulate CNN with a 24/7 transmission.

Put Linder on the air right now and fuck the jew naysayers who will probably say it isn't "professional"!
I have studied Linder for a couple of years now and as everyone knows he is a great writer but after listening to the deep, commanding, insightful voice on Shaenks show...a show that seemed more like the Linder show...well it don't take a rocket scientist to figure it out.

Lets stop pussy-footing around trying to make everything perfect and light this rocket!!
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #10
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

It's going to happen, Steve. But we must clear TAA2 first. It is a great issue, and we're now completing the graphics for it, Stan and I. It is jam-packed with VNN material, and much original material too. We will print several of the best FITZ cartoons in it, too.

You're a businessman, Steve. You know the dangers of too-quick expansion. As do I, from my business days.

It is heartening to see the interest and faith: there is much we can do together.

Probably the best way to develop a network is along the lines of RBN, but with a few crucial differences. 1) our politics. You know what that means. 2) fewer gimmicky promos and too-long bumpers. 3) speaking ought to be the same as writing. if there's nothing to say, shut up. don't waste people's time. the truly beautiful thing about WN is that we have the deep facts all to ourselves, as they've been abandoned by the jews who fear them, and the jew-intimidateds who know they "can't" use them. we can advance our political interests by doing what the controlled media don't: getting a whole different crop of expert on air to talk about the stuff that matters. tied together by the network's theme that the jew is the heart of the problem. so we talk to an immigration guy, and we question him re jew involvement and see if he's tender on the subject. if he's weak, then we start fucking with him. maybe he'll discover balls. or we talk to a physical anthrpologist re the peopling of the americas, politically correct theories vs historically correct ones. the host, again, ties it to the theme: jews queering history; jews electing a new people through immigration; jews loosing niggers via civil rights. we have on JB Cash, say, to talk about whites being discriminated against in professional sports.

this is what we need to do. this is where the information is.

i think that RBN does excellent work, even though i don't agree with libertarians. it gets voices on air i've only read on lrc, and it shows you what people are made of. we can do the same thing with a wider range of people.

when you think about it, we are the only political position that can compass the entire range of opinion, because we aren't scared to name ourselves or our enemies. everybody else is. even the jews. even the jews are afraid to say they hate and want to genocide white people, although they do hate them, and that is their intention. white nationalists are the only people in america who can speak freely. every other party is yiddish in public and whatever in private.

what we can do, is pull the spectrum of permissible opinion Whiteward. it has already been going that way among the intelligent for years. the popularity of our sites is one indication, as is the popularity of other white sites; right sites in general; and the internet over tv. no one goes from being racialist to conservative because conservatives are just racialists who haven't realized it yet. there is no principled conservative case against racism because there can't be - racism is grounded on the particular attention to detail that characterizes the works of burke and calhoun. a german wrote calhoun asking his advice on forming a constitution, and calhoun basically said, look, i can tell you this and that, and give you a couple tips, but to do it right, i would have to know the nature of the region and even moreso the nature of the people for whom the constitution is being devised, and being here in south carolina, i think you're much better suited to figuring that out yourself. now apply that profound approach to race and you get...racism. the true doctrine that men fall into races which differ in extremely meaningful ways.

VNN's thesis has always been that all we need is an open forum and we will win the debate. we will produce good shows, we will draw an audience, and we will see if any of the pallids, lefties, kosherites, what-have-yous dare to take us on. so we'll mix some fighting with some genuine education (not to be underrated these days) and some entertainment, but always without the obnoxious bourgeois smugness that characterizes bill o'reilly and rush limbaugh.
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #11
The King
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder
Probably the best way to develop a network is along the lines of RBN, but with a few crucial differences.
Huh ? I thought we were going to launch a pretty good bicycle because it's cheap, relatively easy to do and we can get it on the road quick.

Now you're talking about building the space shuttle.

That's a five year project.
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #12
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The King
Huh ? I thought we were going to launch a pretty good bicycle because it's cheap, relatively easy to do and we can get it on the road quick.

Now you're talking about building the space shuttle.

That's a five year project.
Not to worry, King. Alex and Stan have a massive Soviet 5 year plan, which is based upon on a state-planned massive expansion of the nation's industrial capacities, as well as forced collectivization of arable land. The plans are focussed on HEAVY INDUSTRY and will be readily available as long as farmowning peasants don't resist!

The good news is, heavily concentrated no nothings of the fertile Ukrainian plains who are stubbornly resisting collectivization will be told all is well and just relax cuz the state is number one!!

Pfttt!!! I could have gotten Alex on internet radio 2 weeks ago and I don't know jack shit about it!

Starting to smell a little fishy here!
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #13
Stan Sikorski
Returned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Upper midwest around cattle.
Posts: 3,463
Default

Alex just handed me the keys to firm up the graphics on TAA #2 last night. This has been the main slowing point for all other projects - the production of TAA #2 - which has priority. I just put a server online lastnight that is going to be the broadcast server for the network, completely under VNN control. It took me two weeks to hammer out hardware and software issues. In billable hours, hardware and software, it cost over $14,000 which I am DONATING to the project. I do have a day job and family and dedicate the rest of my time to this and my band.

It breaks down like this:

Gateway Pentium 3 server with 512mb ram, dual 80mb harddrives, Creative Audigy 2-zs sound card, Vertio G Force vid card and loaded with Windows 2000 Server that is set to run web, ftp and streaming services. Test is here: http://68.44.182.138/index.html

I bill computer work at $35.00 an hour - I have over 56 hours into building and testing this machine.

Also, internet access isn't free. I use a cable connection.

As Alex has been concentrating on getting TAA #2 up to shape he has yet to purchase the hardware he needs to produce his end of the radio network and after he does I will be instructing him on it's use and integration to what I have going here.

I have put out the call for naming the network and gathering additional content to fill out broadcast. As yet only a few have responded with workable ideas.

This stuff takes time if you want to do it right, not fall on your face and look like a rinky-dink bunch of morons. I am doing all on my end without 1 dime of VNN donations to the project.

Itz Coming
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #14
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Sikorski
Alex just handed me the keys to firm up the graphics on TAA #2 last night. This has been the main slowing point for all other projects - the production of TAA #2 - which has priority. I just put a server online lastnight that is going to be the broadcast server for the network, completely under VNN control. It took me two weeks to hammer out hardware and software issues. In billable hours, hardware and software, it cost over $14,000 which I am DONATING to the project. I do have a day job and family and dedicate the rest of my time to this and my band.

It breaks down like this:

Gateway Pentium 3 server with 512mb ram, dual 80mb harddrives, Creative Audigy 2-zs sound card, Vertio G Force vid card and loaded with Windows 2000 Server that is set to run web, ftp and streaming services. Test is here: http://68.44.182.138/index.html

I bill computer work at $35.00 an hour - I have over 56 hours into building and testing this machine.

Also, internet access isn't free. I use a cable connection.

As Alex has been concentrating on getting TAA #2 up to shape he has yet to purchase the hardware he needs to produce his end of the radio network and after he does I will be instructing him on it's use and integration to what I have going here.

I have put out the call for naming the network and gathering additional content to fill out broadcast. As yet only a few have responded with workable ideas.

This stuff takes time if you want to do it right, not fall on your face and look like a rinky-dink bunch of morons. I am doing all on my end without 1 dime of VNN donations to the project.

Itz Coming
Holy Shit Stan YOU are becoming THE SUPER VNNER!~
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #15
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Sikorski
Alex just handed me the keys to firm up the graphics on TAA #2 last night. This has been the main slowing point for all other projects - the production of TAA #2 - which has priority. I just put a server online lastnight that is going to be the broadcast server for the network, completely under VNN control. It took me two weeks to hammer out hardware and software issues. In billable hours, hardware and software, it cost over $14,000 which I am DONATING to the project. I do have a day job and family and dedicate the rest of my time to this and my band.

Itz Coming
Thanks for that fantastic effort, Stan.

It is important that we do what we can, and not try to do more than we can. We are limited by numbers of competent people who can lend a hand, as much as anything.

With radio, we should start by doing what we can do today. That could be simply recording some audio and posting it, however, people have chipped in both money and, in Stan's case, sweat equity, so that we can do actual call-in shows, as I understand it. So this higher level is where we will start.

What we want to do over the network is provide intelligent, serious commentary and education for a White audience. A White NPR or a White RBN is far more useful in pursuing our mission a bunch of WP songs. It seems to me that a good way to go is start with one show, and fill in the rest of the airtime, assuming it can be done at reasonable cost and is technically manageable, with evergreen material from archives, such as might be found on SolarGeneral. Perhaps Malleus can comment on that.

The careful coordination of efforts will help us make something. I don't mean that we can build an RBN overnight, but that RBN is to some degree successful, and might be worth examining as to emulation. RBN has about a dozen hosts. It puts out about a dozen hours of original material a weekday, and a couple hours on the weekend. It's content is "patriot," with more openness toward race-reality, among some of its hosts, than other militia-patriot-Constituationalist-individualist shows exhibit.
 
Old March 17th, 2005 #16
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

What I mean in the above is that I'm in this thing to effect political change, and will do everything in my power to bring it about. I'm not in this for name and pelf, but to clean up the problem that threatens all our futures. I communicate this fundamental seriousness through my tone, if you heard the Peter Principle interview. I communicate it through sarcasm, irony, and frontstabbing on VNN proper, although idiots do not perceive this, believing only that which takes a form they understand is serious, and anything else a joke.

We're not here to crack jokes, to hold happy racist fun hour, but to offer something better than the jew networks have. All you people who cite other groups and people in WN -- forget them. They aren't the benchmark for anything. The jews are the ones ahead of us. They're the ones who've got the power and the money. They're the ones who have succeeded. They're the ones we should look to emulate. Not in subtance, obviously, but in such particulars as we can emulate them.

We should think big, and plan carefully. I know what I'd like to hear and don't. I know who I'd like to hear, and what questions I'd like them to answer. That's where we'll start.
 
Old March 28th, 2005 #17
brutus
Senior Member
 
brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: naples
Posts: 11,123
Default

RE: Alex Linder

Quote:
They're the ones who have succeeded. They're the ones we should look to emulate. Not in substance, obviously, but in such particulars as we can emulate them.
I strongly agree with this.

And I have faith in your judgement calls. Please allow me to toss in my two cents for what it's worth.

In this area of discussion, the jew's success is due largely to the lack of opposition in their media presentation. Essentially there is none.

Everything they produce is heavily edited and spun to accommodate and facilitate their agenda, everything. Even the jew's live radio stuff has a seven second delay and call screeners to assure that there are no screw-ups and that no off-message material or unwanted perceptions leak out.

I suggest we use these types of "safe-guards" and not be tempted to solely rely upon the righteousness of our truth to carry the day. (however ultimately it will prevail) Egos need to be tempered with reality, easier said then done.

Too many times, I've seen the "side of right" get carved-up like a Christmas turkey in live situations. The antis' clever ambushes and those days when we're just not as sharp as we should be, can be killers.

Surely come-out strong, but prudent, and focus some thought as to how we will be perceived by the racially unaware casual observer. I see a potential lack of efficiency in preaching to the choir when recruiting should be the main objective. Throw the necessary bone to the choir and also let them know the realities that we are faced with........they will get it.

Best of luck on this most important project!
__________________
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
 
Old April 29th, 2005 #18
Malleus
Let them eat globaloney...
 
Malleus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: because...
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder
... It seems to me that a good way to go is start with one show, and fill in the rest of the airtime, assuming it can be done at reasonable cost and is technically manageable, with evergreen material from archives, such as might be found on SolarGeneral. Perhaps Malleus can comment on that.
www.solargeneral.com/library/mcveigh.htm

Why not start with this? A fine article, it'z.

Take anything you see on the site and run with it. Make it intelligent and thoughful and give the audience something poignant to think about.
__________________
SolarGeneral.com
White Multi-Media Library

Rising again soon...
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.
Page generated in 0.68970 seconds.