Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 24th, 2014 #21
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Racial Partition for Racial Preservation
Racial Partition for Racial Preservation
by
Richard McCulloch
A racial partition of the United States for the purpose of racial preservation and independence would involve the creation of separate, independent and sovereign racial nations in accordance with the principles of racial rights, racial security and the Racial Compact. A just partition would take into consideration the relative historical role of each racial group as well as their current position, and a practical partition would seek to create compact racial nations with geographical integrity and the shortest possible borders for their area. Persons of mixed racial ancestry would be classified according to their visible racial traits, characteristics and identity (or phenotype) and assigned to the most appropriate racial nation. Racially-mixed families would be classified and assigned according to the racial identity or phenotype of the children. Many different plans for partition are possible. The author offers the following proposal as one possibility for consideration.


For the purpose of geographic partition for racial preservation and independence, the population of the United States could be divided into eight racial groupings, as listed below:
1. A Nordish (Northern European) centered racial grouping consisting of the Nordish-American population and the “near Nordish” racial elements — i.e., those most similar and closely related to, and therefore most easily assimilated by, the Nordish population. These include the Alpine, Dinaric and Ladogan populations of central and eastern European origin. Persons of southern European origin (Spain, Portugal, Italy and the Balkans) who are of Nordish racial type would also be eligible for inclusion in this grouping. These racial elements can be regarded as assimilable by the Nordish-American population within the existing proportions. This grouping comprised 86% of the U.S. population in 1880, 77.3% in 1970, and 65.5% in 1994.
2. A Congoid (Sub-Saharan African) grouping consisting of all members of the Congoid race (including all persons of obvious partial Congoid ancestry except the mixed Caribbean peoples) in North America, and all those in Europe who cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral homelands. This group comprised 11.1% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 12.1% in 1994.
3. A Latin Amerindian racial grouping consisting of the Mexican, Central and South American Indian and Mestizo (mixed Amerindian and Caucasian) population. This group, the majority of the U.S. “Hispanic” population, comprised 2.5% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 8.8% in 1994.
4. A North Amerindian group consisting of the native North American Indian population. This group comprised .4% of the U.S. population in 1970 and .8% in 1994.
5. An East Asian racial grouping consisting of those members of the Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian races in North America, and all those in Europe who cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral homelands. This group comprised 1% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 2.7% in 1994.
6. A Mediterranid-Armenid racial grouping which would include the Southern European and other European racial elements not included with the Nordish centered group, together with the Armenid racial elements. This grouping comprised 7% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 6.9% in 1994.
7. A North African and West Asian racial grouping that would include the Pakistani and Asian Indian (Indic and Dravidic), Irano-Afgan, Turanid (Turkic), Orientalid (Arabic) and Saharid-Mediterranid populations of North African and West Asian origin in North America, as well as those in Europe who cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral homelands. This grouping comprised .1% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 1.8% in 1994.
8. A grouping of mostly “Hispanic” Caribbean peoples of mixed Congoid-Caucasian ancestry who are distinct from the African-American Congoid population. This grouping would include most Puerto Ricans and Dominicans as well as many Cubans. These elements comprised about .7% of the mainland U.S. population in 1970 and 1.4% in 1994.
As illustrated by the above map, an independent nation for the Congoid racial group could be formed out of the area of the states of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Arkansas north of the Colorado river, west of the Mississippi river, and south of the Arkansas river. It would include the cities of Little Rock, Shreveport, Oklahoma City, Dallas, Houston, Galveston, Austin and Amarillo. Its territory would be about 257,823 square miles (larger than France, which has an area of 213,009 square miles, or Kenya, which has an area of 224,081 square miles).

An independent nation for the “Latin” or “Hispanic” Amerindian and Mestizo racial group could be formed from the territory of Texas south of the Colorado river, and New Mexico south of the line of 35 degrees north latitude. It would include the cities of San Antonio, Corpus Christi, El Paso and Alamogordo. Its area would total about 198,901 square miles (larger than Spain, which has an area of 195,988 square miles).

An independent nation for the North American Amerindian population could be created out of the states of Arizona and New Mexico north of the line of 35 degrees north latitude and east of the Little Colorado and Colorado rivers. It would include the cities of Santa Fe and Albuquerque. Its territory would be about 66,798 square miles.

An independent nation for the East Asian population could be formed from San Diego, Orange, Riverside and Imperial counties in California and Yuma county in Arizona. Its area would be 21,961 square miles (larger than Taiwan, which has 13,814 square miles) and would include the cities of San Diego, Anaheim, Palm Springs and Riverside.

The Mediterranid-Armenid grouping could be formed into two independent nations. One could consist of Florida south of the line of 29 degrees latitude and north of Collier and Broward counties, with an area of about 21,900 square miles (larger by half than the Netherlands, which has 15,770 square miles). It would include the cities of Palm Beach, Tampa, Sarasota and Orlando. The other could consist of San Bernardino, Santa Barbara, Ventura, and Los Angeles counties in California, Clark county in Nevada, and all of Arizona except for Yuma county and the territory which is part of the native Amerindian nation, with an area of about 126,162 square miles (larger than Italy, which has 116,311 square miles). It would include the cities of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Las Vegas, Flagstaff, Winslow, Phoenix and Tucson. The total combined area of both nations would be about 138,211 square miles.

An independent nation for the West Asian and North African grouping could be formed from Monterey, San Benito, Fresno, Kings, Tulare, San Luis Obispo and Kern counties in California. Its area would be 28,307 square miles (again, as in the preceding paragraph, about the same size as the Netherlands and Belgium added together) and would include the cities of Fresno and Bakersfield.

An independent nation for the Caribbean peoples of mixed Congoid-Caucasian ancestry could be formed from Broward, Collier, Dade and Monroe counties in Florida north of Long Key. Its area would be about 6,160 square miles, almost twice the size of Puerto Rico, which has 3,435 square miles. It would include the cities of Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Naples.

The Hawaiian islands to the west of Oahu (Kauai, etc.) could be reserved for the native Pacific Islanders. Oahu and the islands to the east would belong to the Nordish nation, as the “crossroads of the Pacific” providing a strategically vital link between the Nordish countries of North America and those of Australia and New Zealand.

The remaining territory of the United States would be an independent nation for the Nordish centered racial group. Its population of about 168 million (based on 1994 U.S. population figures) would be about 86.9% Nordish (146 million) and 13.1% Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan (22 million), plus whatever number of eligible “assimilated” Mediterranids would choose to be a part of it.

The land area of the 48 contiguous states is 2,962,031 square miles. The partition proposal detailed above would allocate 2,234,573 square miles, or 75.4% of this area, to the Nordish centered racial grouping, which comprised 77.3% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 65.5% in 1994 (or about 168 million people out of a total population of 258 million). It would allocate 727,548 square miles, or 24.6% of the area of the 48 contiguous states, to the other racial groups, who in 1994 totaled 90 million or 34.5% of the population, but in 1970 comprised only 22.7% of the population. Thus, this proposal would grant 75.4% of the area of the 48 contiguous states to the racial group that was 77.3% of the population in 1970, and 24.6% of the area to the groups that totaled 22.7% of the population in 1970.

All of the independent non-Nordish nations resulting from the racial partition would be situated along the southern periphery of the United States. As the southern periphery already borders a non-Nordish country and region (Mexico and the Caribbean) this would minimize the length of borders between the Nordish and non-Nordish races. None of the territory allotted to the non-Nordish nations belonged to the United States before 1803. To prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons, any nuclear weapons or production facilities located in non-Nordish areas would be moved to new sites within the Nordish area. Prisoners and other institutionalized persons would go with their race. With the exception of indigenous peoples, non-Nordish racial elements in the other Nordish countries of Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand would be encouraged to repatriate to their own racial homelands. Otherwise they could join other members of their race in the appropriate successor state as given above.

Return link to The Preservationist Alternative

Return to Racial Compact main page
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #22
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

An Interview with Richard McCulloch
Interview



In October, 1998 Richard McCulloch was interviewed over the internet by three European correspondents.



Dear Mr. McCulloch,

Here are our questions. Feel free to digress as far as you like, and to leave any question you
don’t like unanswered. If you have any additional information we
haven’t specifically asked for, feel free to state it as well.



1. SOME PERSONAL QUESTIONS
==========================

1.1) Can you tell us something about yourself, and where your life-long
interest in the Nordish people comes from? What place has racial
consciousness taken in your life through the years? In other words, how
did you develop your way of thinking and your ability to express this
way of thinking in the great way you do?

1.1 Answer: I wish I knew, but perhaps this degree of self-awareness is denied to us. I can say that it is an irreducible part of what I am, at the very core of my being and identity, as far back as I can remember. I spend a great deal of time thinking about these matters, and with time my thoughts have been refined and my ability to express them improved.

1.2) We are, and other readers might be, curious about your own ethnic
background. Obviously, you are Nordish, but to which branches of the
Nordish race do you trace back your ancestry?

1.2 Answer: Like many Nordish-Americans, my ancestry derives from several of the peoples of northwestern Europe. My two grandfathers’ families were old-stock American. My McCulloch ancestors were what we call Scotch-Irish or Ulster Scots, emigrating from the Edinburgh area to Ulster in Northern Ireland in the 1600s, and after 1717 emigrating from there to western Virginia, ending up in 1792 in western Pennsylvania, where they intermarried with many other old-stock American lines of varied Nordish origin (Boyd, Craig, Earhart, etc.). My Dutch, Swedish and Huguenot ancestors (van der Goes, van Nes, van der Vliet, van Arsdalen, Claesen, Anderson, Latourette, etc.) settled in New Netherlands (New York) in the 1630s, moving on in community groups to New Jersey in the 1670s and Illinois in 1836. My two grandmothers’ families arrived more recently — my German grandmother’s family emigrated from Berlin to Detroit in the early 1890s shortly before she was born, and my Norwegian grandmother’s family emigrated from a small town near Trøndheim in 1911 when she was 8 years old, settling in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.



1.3) What study did you do? What is the relation of this study to your
racial philosophy?

1.3 Answer: My college major was history, with anthropology my second area of study. This reflected my interests from an early age. The subject matter in my college classes was often almost a review for me of subjects I had already studied. Both areas of study fostered my racial awareness and a wider perspective. My parents purchased a set of The World Book Encyclopedia in 1959, around the time of my 10th birthday, and I remember reading the section on race soon after this. I watched many television documentaries that were informative about recent history. I remember reading H.G. Wells’ An Outline of History in 1961-62 when I was 12 or 13 years old, and being struck by a passage in which the author stated that humanity, after thousands of generations of divergence, was apparently changing course in the direction of recoalescence, and realizing the consequences of this development. From my readings in anthropology I learned that if two distinct peoples were found inhabiting the same territory it was assumed that one or both of the peoples was a relatively recent arrival, and that they had not been living together for long, as populations that had lived together for a long time were invariably blended together by intermixture into one population where the distinctions between the ancestral peoples were gradually eliminated. Obviously, awareness of this anthropological principle made the consequences of multiracialization very clear to me, and I began to express my concerns on this matter to my friends and family members while still in my teens. But I was not very effective. Indeed, through my college years I felt rather isolated, not knowing anyone else who shared my racial views (the only “racist” organizations I knew of were those of the KKK and neo-Nazi variety, whose racial programs were supremacist rather than preservationist), until one day in 1973, while I was a graduate student, that I discovered The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson in a downtown bookstore, and discovered there were others with whom I could connect who were addressing the race issue in a morally and intellectually respectable manner. Robertson’s example inspired me to begin writing about race.



1.4) What interests do you have? We know for instance that you are
interested in the exploration of the solar system – and beyond. We got
the impression that you have a love for Science Fiction books and
movies.

1.4 Answer: I think my early interest in history went hand in hand with my early interest in Science Fiction, as good, credible Science Fiction seemed almost like an imaginative continuation or projection of the past and present into the future, an extension of history. Some of my earliest reading in both history and Science Fiction was in the form of comic books (I wish I still had them). In adulthood my reading of Science Fiction has decreased, but this has been partially offset by the greatly increased quantity of television and motion picture Science Fiction. From my perspective as a Nordish racial preservationist, there is one particular criticism I have of this genre. By portraying the Nordish race as still existing (apparently in full undiminished form) after several centuries of multiracialism it helps foster the common misconception (indeed, the fatal fallacy) that the Nordish race can continue to exist, even without diminishment, under multiracial conditions. The various Star Trek series as well as Babylon 5 (which reminds me of Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy in its epic story line) are examples of this. One exception is Arthur Clarke’s Imperial Earth, which I read circa 1970, which is set several centuries in the future when the various white racial types no longer exist due to intermixture. Of course, Clarke mentions this fact almost casually and does not treat it as being of any significance. It was, however, significant to me. I did not finish the book. Another criticism of the Star Trek series is its use of the name “Ferengi” for the most unattractive, dishonorable and ignoble of its alien races. “Ferengi” is of course the Islamic World’s name for the Franks, which they used to refer to all Western Europeans. I assume that the people in charge of Star Trek development knew this, and it can be taken as an anti-Nordish insult that reveals their lack of regard for the Nordish race.

The apocalyptic theme that is common to many SciFi films — from alien invasions and infiltration to “body snatching” (replacing humans, especially persons in authority, with alien impostors) and meteors — is strangely analogous to the situation now threatening the Nordish race. Our race is threatened with destruction. Its continued existence is at stake, much as the existence of humanity or the earth is at stake in these films. One particularly apt analogy is to the “Borg Collective” in Star Trek. We too are threatened with assimilation into the collective (the non-Nordish mass of humanity), and told that our assimilation is inevitable and resistance is futile. Of course, when the humans in these films become aware of their danger they do everything in their power to combat it (Capt. Picard answered the Borg with a resounding “No!”), as we hope our race will also when it is aware. To seek and welcome the destruction would move the plot into the “Twilight Zone” genre. At the moment our position is more like the humans in the alien infiltration or “body snatcher” films, with only a few of us aware of what is happening, and desperately trying to inform our disbelieving brethren.

2. SOME CLARIFICATIONS WANTED
=============================

2.1) In TIAD [The Ideal and Destiny] you give a four-fold classification of the Race; there are
4 types: dark, middle, light and ultra-Nordic.
In TNQ [The Nordish Quest], and on your web site you give a much more elaborate system,
which describes the Nordish race as a center with concentric circles
around it, and various subtypes within these circles. Can we assume that
the classification in TIAD should be considered as a sliding scale from
the most outer Nordic types to the most inner, or should we consider it to
be outdated/overruled by the new classification?

2.1 Answer: Consider the dark-through-ultra Nordic classification scheme overruled by the new scheme. The racial boundaries between Nordish (Northern European) and non-Nordish are the same in both classifications. The change is strictly internal within the Nordish group, classifying its various component elements in a more accurate manner. I am sorry to say that until 1985, in spite of all my searching through major university libraries, I had never found a book on race that went much beyond Ripley’s old classification of Europeans into Nordics, Alpines and Mediterraneans. Usually the only addition was the East Baltic type. Even John Baker’s otherwise excellent book Race, which appeared in 1974, is deficient in this regard. In 1985 I obtained a copy of Carleton Coon’s 1939 work The Races of Europe, which was written as a college text on the subject, and although I have points of disagreement with it, it is by far the most definitive work on the subject with which I am familiar, and represents a line of scholarship that has been neglected and almost forgotten over the last half century. The scheme in The Nordish Quest and my web site can be considered as a slightly modified and updated version of his classification system, synthesized with Baker and others.

2.2) Can you give us any sources / further reading advises on the racial
classifications of Human- and Northernkind, and the racial composition
of the European nations?

2.2 Answer: Unfortunately, the study of the races of humanity has been in disfavor over the last half century, and any serious attempt to study it in an objective manner will likely result in the scholar being branded a racist, probably the most feared epithet in the modern Western world (although not outside the West) and certainly the most feared in the “politically correct” groves of academia. I have heard that the best work in this area over the last generation has been done in Hungary, but I do not know of any specifics. Other than my own work the best material I am familiar with is that of Baker and Coon mentioned in the previous answer. I am sorry to say that I find much of the work of Luigi Cavalli-Sforza and his group to be misleading in its interpretation of the genetic data, which our present culture effectively prevents from being challenged by alternative interpretations.

2.3) In TIAD [The Ideal and Destiny] you write that minimizing the interference of the state with
society would be the best way to preserve and improve the race, and that
interference of the state – i.e. state-capitalism, or socialism – is a
political-economic system that is far more likely to slow down or
reverse the divergent evolution of the human races. However, in DOA [Destiny of Angels] you
mention there sometimes is a discrepancy between “internal natural
wealth” and “external material wealth”, which can lead to the union
between the material wealthy and the natural wealthy- and, through a
process of intermixing, to the loss of inheritable beauty.
But, this selling of racial beauty – because this is what you
essentially describe – is in fact a liberal-capitalist process. Should a
moderate form of state interference not be desired to limit these
processes, and make sure that those rich in natural wealth but poor in
material wealth, should prosper, and those poor in natural wealth should
be stimulated not to procreate?

2.3 Answer: The above section in Destiny of Angels refers to interracial matings rather than to matings within the Nordish race, and especially to the mating of men of various non-Nordish Caucasian racial types to Nordish women who are attracted to their material wealth and social standing. In a monoracial society this problem would not exist.

To maintain a generally positive evolutionary trend it is of course necessary for those of higher quality to reproduce at a higher rate than those of lower quality, but I prefer positive eugenics to negative eugenics, measures to encourage those of higher quality to have more children rather than measures aimed at discouraging the reproduction of those of lower quality. At the present, considering the below replacement level reproductive rate of our race for the last quarter century, what we need is a pro-natalist movement to encourage and promote a general increase in reproduction across all classes. Our problem is not so much that the lower quality elements are having too many children, as their rate is also low, but that our race in general is having too few children, especially those of higher quality. Government should play some role in promoting a pro-natalist environment (and in monitoring and reporting demographic trends), as should all other cultural and social institutions, especially education to increase awareness of the importance of reproductive decisions, but I do not really trust its wisdom to manage the reproduction of the race as much as I trust the wisdom of millions of individual couples. The latter may be far from perfect, but I cannot help believing that the former would be so much worse.



3. RACIST PHILOSOPHY VS. RACIAL NIHILISM
========================================

We’ll now confront you with some of the questions people ask racists.
They are not our questions; we just would like to know how you would
reply to them as they represent some of the common misunderstandings
about racism and the ignorance that is forced upon people by the
dominant altruist-egalitarian ideology.

3.1) “What does a person’s race matter? Isn’t it much more important
that some one behaves good and means well? Bad people come in all
colors, and so do good people.”



3.1 Answer: This is a common racial nihilist objection to racial preservationism, but this one is easy as I have already answered it. Character and race are two different things, as I wrote in the footnotes of “Many Mansions:”

“When Martin Luther King remarked in his celebrated ‘I have a dream’ speech that a person should be judged not by the color of their skin (a minimalist expression for the thousands of genetic differences involved in race) but by the content of their character, he provided a platitude often used by racial nihilists to oppose racial (and especially Nordish) rights, independence and preservation. He also implied a conflict between race and character, as if one necessarily excluded or was inconsistent with the other, an implication reminiscent of the supposed conflict between physical reality and a ‘higher’ or superior spiritual reality which should be given precedence, with race belonging to the physical realm and character to the spiritual. But they are each part of what we are, each judged or determined by its own proper terms and standards. To assert that racial judgments or determinations should not be made is the position of racial nihilism, which denies racial rights, racial values, and the love of race which promotes racial preservation.

“There is no conflict between race and character, and it is dishonest to pretend otherwise, and immoral to use character as an argument to justify the violation of the racial right to continued life, existence and preservation, as it is to use claims of a supposed (and perhaps imaginary) ‘higher’ spiritual reality to promote actions that are destructive of the physical and material reality in which we exist. In fact, one of the primary measures of morality and character should be respect for the rights of others, and this includes respect for the rights of other races, and particularly their right to life. Good character and morality should be consistent with the Golden Rule of live and let live, and therefore inconsistent with the denial or violation of the rights of other races to continued life, preservation and independence.”
In our campaign to secure the preservation and independence of our race, and indeed these same rights for all races, we are the protagonists and our opponents, including those who make such assertions and objections (disguised as questions) as above, are the antagonists. Many of these assertions and objections are nonsensical, logically inconsistent and even incoherent, defying basic assumptions of logic and reason, and thus frustratingly difficult to answer. If the person making these antagonistic assertions is non-Nordish, then one can assume that he is aggressively promoting what he sees as his own racial interests contrary to the most vital rights and interests of the Nordish race. If the person is Nordish one can assume that he is hostile to the most basic interests of his own race, in accordance with the ethics and values of racial nihilism. They have been taught that this is a morally superior position and that all else is intolerably evil. In addition to the quote above, I would answer such assertions essentially as follows:

“To say something matters is to say that it is important and has value. To say something does not matter is to say it is of no importance or value. To say something is the only thing that matters is to say that all else is without importance or value. I act on the presumption that everything that exits — every part of Creation — matters, that it has importance and value, and that it is both improper and nihilistic to presume otherwise. This importance and value can be regarded as objective, based on its position and role in Creation, or subjective, based on the sentiments of those who love it, by which standard anything that matters or is important to anyone, that is loved or valued by anyone, is regarded as valuable and important. The continued existence of the Nordish race may not matter to you [addressing the antagonist opponent of Nordish preservation] but it matters to me. You may not value, care for, or love the Nordish race, but I do. You may not consider its existence to matter, to be important, but I do. I know that the ideology of multiracialism says that it is morally wrong to love or value one’s race (especially if one is Nordish), to care for it, regard it as important, or desire its continued existence, well-being and independence, but I consider this ideology — which you apparently support — as immoral and destructive, and in the present context particularly destructive of my race. I think there should be a moral presumption in favor of preservation and against destruction, and thus in favor of the conditions that preserve and against the conditions that destroy. By this presumption it is multiracialism that is immoral and my philosophy of racial preservationism that is moral.”

I would like to see every person in a prominent or influential position asked if they love, value and care for the Nordish race, if they consider its existence to matter or be important, if they favor its preservation and support its most vital and legitimate rights and interests, its continued existence and independence. These are questions they have never been asked, and have never had to answer. They would prefer not to, so as not to prematurely alert the Nordish population before it is too late for the destructive course they have set to be reversed. Unlike the antagonist questioner above, they are much more discrete, and much less honest. Therefore, the above question is not likely to be publicly asked of a prominent member of the power structure. Not yet. We typically encounter it at a much more basic level, with little or no audience. I think the extent to which you answer it should depend on the audience. The antagonist questioner is probably not worth the effort (you need to assess this on an individual basis) but you may have an audience that includes people who are worth the effort. Your response should then be made for their sake.



3.2) “Why do you care if colored-eyed, blond people would disappear?
That will happen after you are dead anyway. Why bother? Things change;
that’s the way things normally go.”



3.2 Answer: The reference to colored-eyed, blond people is an evasive way of referring to the Nordish race, minimizing or trivializing its many unique traits and characteristics by arbitrarily restricting reference to only one or two traits (unless they are merely responding to your own use of these traits as a reason or justification for Nordish preservation, which is why if you use such an argument you should make it clear that you are talking about the preservation of a race, not just some of its traits). People who use such language should be obliged to clarify what they are referring to, and thus admit that they are referring to the Nordish race, not just to certain traits associated with it. So they are really saying no one should care if the Nordish race disappears — i.e., becomes extinct through replacement and intermixture — that its existence is not worthy of continuation. Where does the nihilistic reasoning behind this question end? Why should one care about preservation or conservation, about the continued existence of something that exists, that is a part of nature and the universe, whether a rain forest, a class of animals, a race of humanity, or the planet earth itself? The answer, ultimately, is that we value it and consider it important to us for some reason, and if it is an important part of our personal lives the probable answer is that we love it. Do not be afraid or ashamed to say that you love your race and that this is the source of your motivation. In fact, this should be the emphasis of your argument. Your love for your race should be affirmed whenever the subject of its preservation is debated. You can tell such people that you are sorry they do not think the Nordish race is worthy of continued existence, sorry that they do not care about its survival, but that you do because you love it and consider it worth saving.

Regarding the issue of racial preservation, the above question is a very non-committal, even cowardly, form of expression of those unwilling to state their own position. They should be confronted with the necessity of stating their position, of what they prefer or want if given the choice between Nordish preservation or destruction. They should be obliged to answer that question. If they say that, if the choice was theirs to make, they would prefer continued Nordish existence, that is one thing; if they say they would choose Nordish nonexistence, that is quite another thing. You could then turn the tables on them and ask them why, pointing out the general moral presumption in favor of preservation over destruction. Why do they favor Nordish extinction? What is their motive? What possible justification could there be for desiring the disappearance or nonexistence of a human race?

When telling someone that the Nordish race is moving toward extinction I have often heard the comment “We won’t live to see it” or “We’ll be dead by then.” This is often a sign of fatalistic resignation, of people who see no way out, no viable alternative, and have been convinced that there is nothing they can do to change our course and therefore accept it as inevitable, adapting to live with this knowledge by accepting it, and telling themselves that what will be lost is of little value and not cause for grief or concern. They do not really want this to happen, but unless they can see a credible alternative they are likely to resent any call to resist it as futile and disturbing. If they say they want the Nordish race to be preserved, then present your alternative — one that is morally and intellectually acceptable, even preferable, to the present course. If they say they want the Nordish race to be destroyed (usually they are not so honest, and evade the question) there is really very little purpose in continuing the conversation, and certainly almost no hope of converting this person to Nordish preservationism. It might be interesting to ask them if they would care if certain other races were to disappear, if there is any race they wish preserved. If they say no then you have a pure racial nihilist. If they would preserve other races but not the Nordish race then you have unmasked a specifically anti-Nordish strain of racial nihilism, and, if you have an audience, you can probably do no better than to lay it bare, expose it for what it is and describe your alternative. Say that the planet is big enough for all the races of humanity to exist on, as they have for the last 40,000-plus years. No race need disappear. This change they say is normal (and infer is inevitable) — the disappearance of the Nordish race — is not necessary, and certainly not normal. There is nothing normal about it. In fact it is completely abnormal. The normality of the last 40,000 years is for the races to each inhabit their own part of the planet, and to be secure in their continued existence in their own homelands. It is the recent abnormal violation of this normality, with other races moving into the Nordish parts of the planet, the Nordish homelands, which is now threatening the Nordish race with destruction. If this violation of normality is corrected, and each race is again secure in its own parts of the planet, all the races of humanity can continue to exist and share the earth together for uncounted millennia to come, and none need disappear.

My first encounter with explicit racial nihilism occurred in my senior year of high school (1967) in my American Institutions social studies class. The teacher, Mr. Schelter, began to preach racial intermixture as the solution to the race problem. I raised my hand and objected that intermixture would cause the extinction of the white race (I used the term “white” in those days). He replied “So? What’s so special about the white race?” I was caught by surprise by this nihilistic reply and was not prepared to answer it. Until then I had naively assumed that no responsible or respectable person would knowingly advocate the destruction of my race, or any other race. I assumed that people who supported the conditions and practices that cause racial destruction did so because they were unaware of the consequences, not because they actually desired Nordish destruction. I still think that this is true of the great majority of our race who support multiracialism. Certainly the true consequences are not acknowledged by prominent leaders of the multiracialist establishment, but are evaded or denied. If the power structure behaves in this manner it can be assumed that they are afraid they would lose at least the consensus of public support for their policies if people were generally aware of their racially destructive consequences. Thus establishment leaders do not publicly make the kind of nihilistic remark as the person in this question. At least not yet. And that is itself cause for hope.



3.3) “Why do you praise this so-called Nordish beauty? There are lot’s
of ugly white people, and there are beautiful non-whites too, so your
esthetic argument is invalid.”

3.3 Answer: The praise of Nordish beauty is, of course, only relevant to those who appreciate it. As a reason or justification for Nordish preservation it is only effective with those who regard Nordish beauty as valuable and important and worth preserving. It is ineffective with those who regard Nordish beauty as being without value or importance. In the end, we will only preserve that which we love, and if the Nordish race is preserved it will be by those who love it, including those who love its beauty. In general, you should not have to justify Nordish preservation on the basis of its beauty (the “esthetic argument”) or intelligence, as the right of a race to exist should be an absolute principle of morality and not be dependent on its qualities, yet its beauty — based on appropriate examples (usually well-known celebrities, although your use of them as examples should not imply that they support the preservation of their race, or any of its other interests, as many, if not most, successful celebrities in the current cultural milieu will probably disappoint you in this regard) — should certainly be mentioned at every opportunity as a reason why it should be valued and loved, and should make clear to any sensible person why its beauty is not interchangeable with, or replaceable by, the beauty of any other race.

When Mr. Schelter asked me what was so special about the white race that it deserved to exist (see response to previous question) he was playing the justification game, the ancient philosophical challenge to justify one’s existence, or the existence of one’s people, on the grounds that one is superior or special, and therefore worthy to exist, by some external measure. But the only measure that counts is internal, it comes from within us. It is we who make something valuable, meaningful, important or special by regarding it so. All value and meaning is determined and bestowed by us. (We are now told that the existence of the Nordish race has no meaning, value or importance, and that it is wrong, immoral and “racist” for us to think otherwise.) I often think of the justification game as the “Schelter trap,” the false belief that many fall into that the preservation of the Nordish race must be justified by assertions that it is superior to other races, or conversely by claims that other races are inferior, and that without such superiority it does not deserve to exist. This logical trap assumes that superiority is required to be worthy of existence. Ultimately, the right of our race to exist does not depend on it being superior to any other race in any way, whether in beauty, intelligence, morality or creativity, but on the very fact of its existence and the moral presumption in favor of preserving that which exists, and on the fact that there are many millions of people who love and value it and want its continued existence, whose values and wishes should be treated with full consideration and respect. It is they who give its existence value and meaning and it is by their will that it has the right to exist.

If the person denying the basic rights of the Nordish race to preservation and independence is a member of a non-Nordish race, who is offended that you regard traits which he does not share as valuable and important, angered that you love and hold dear things that are outside of him and of which he is not a part, and insulted that you do not want your race to join with his, become one with it and become what it is, but want it to remain separate and distinct from his, you should tell him that you respect the right of his race to existence and independence in its own homelands, that you would not be offended by his love for his race and its existence, and that you reasonably expect the same consideration from him. Also, you should inform him that the mutual recognition of the right of each race to exist is the essential basis for trust and good will in relations between races, that without such recognition it is better to have no relations at all, and that if he does not respect the most vital and legitimate rights and interests of your race it is you who has the just cause for anger, not him.



3.4) “Isn’t it a fact that in the Middle Ages the Arab world was more
powerful, more advanced and more scientific than the Western world?
Doesn’t this make your assumption of the Nordish Race as the “Race of
Creators” invalid?”

3.4 Answer: This question is not really relevant to the issue of racial preservation, and if it is asked it is probably because the questioner assumes, rightly or wrongly, that you are justifying your call for Nordish preservation on the assertion that it is the “Race of Creators.” You should not let your expressions of praise for your race, lauding its virtues, beauty and achievements, however legitimate and well-deserved, be mistaken as your justification for its preservation, which would imply that you believe the right of a race to exist is dependent on such considerations.

That said, and addressing the question on its merits, and as not relevant to the issue of racial preservation, Lawrence Brown, in his 1963 book The Might of the West, answers it very well. Empirical science was a unique creation of the Western World, beginning in the Middle Ages with those thinkers, such as Roger Bacon, who laid its metaphysical foundations. Arab physics was what Brown calls “the physics of magic,” of the alchemist looking for the philosopher’s stone or other magical powers, and its influence on the West in this area was harmful. As for power, certainly by the beginnings of the Crusades it was the West that was on the strategic offensive, exercising the dominant role, and the Arab world that was on the defensive, in which they were ultimately successful as the West refocused its energies on its internal struggles. When one looks at the science and engineering and technology that characterizes the modern world it is all essentially a creation of the West, adopted by the other peoples of humanity. Even with the diffusion of Western knowledge among the very capable peoples of northeast Asia, most notably Japan, the primary creation of new technology still occurs in the West, with the other peoples engaging in secondary creation, the further development or refinement of technology the West started. While the proportionate role of the Nordish race in the Classical world is more difficult to determine, certainly since the Middle Ages the Nordish race has clearly been the dominant racial element in the development of the West.

3.5) “Even if there would be differences in development, in intelligence
etc., what would they matter? Isn’t this race mixing, this global coming
together part of our destiny? It would make a better world”

3.5 Answer: Destiny? Destiny is not preordained or determined by some external force. It is determined by us, by our choice, for which we are responsible. This question is another example of the attempt to portray the destruction of the Nordish race as inevitable, as something beyond our control caused by some external power, and thus evading the responsibility of our own actions and choices, which are the true determining force of the future. A better world? Why is one mixed race better for the world than the many distinct races that now exist and have existed on this world for tens of thousands of years? Specifically, why would the world be better without the existence of the Nordish race? Is not the planet big enough for all of its children, a house of many mansions? It has been for tens of thousands of years. Why should we change this? And make no mistake, if it does change it is humans and their actions that change it. It is a matter of human action, of human choice and decision, not of destiny or anything else outside of us. We can choose between the continued existence of the different races or their blending into one mixed race. In actual practice rather than theory, for the foreseeable future this is really a choice between the continued existence of the Nordish race in its homelands or its replacement by a hybridized African-Asian-European population in which the European element will be genetically submerged (and therefore effectively extinct or destroyed), while the non-European races will continue to exist in their own homelands.

3.6) “You and your believers have lost so many battles during the last
50 years that the war must be practically lost. Your enemy, the
proponents of multiculturalism, enjoys an almost total dominance. The
race mixing and the assimilation process has gone so far that a reversal
of this development would cause far more pain and discomfort than what
the northern peoples, who have grown very comfortable lately, could
endure. So why do you bother? What makes you think you can change the
world and in such a drastic manner too?”

3.6 Answer: Drastic? The extinction of the Nordish race would be a far more drastic change of the world than the restoration of the normal condition of racial separation. What makes the proponents of Nordish extinction think they can do this, or should do this? This seems to be another version of the claim of inevitability, that resistance is futile. Of course, if people can be made to believe this is true then it is likely to become the truth, as they will lose the will to resist.

As far as the war being practically lost, the fact is that we have not yet begun to fight. There has thus far been no significant Nordish opposition to multiracialism and the forces of racial destruction it has set in motion. This is because, so far, most Nordish people are still ignorant of what is at stake, still do not realize or understand what is happening, are still unaware of the consequences of multiracialist policies. Sometimes when you mention these consequences you hear the racial nihilist responses and questions listed here, but much more often you see and hear expressions of disbelief and incomprehension. Even many intelligent and thoughtful people, even supposed experts on the race problem, cannot understand or comprehend the fact that racial preservation requires reproductive isolation from other races, which requires racial separation. They do not understand what any competent anthropologist should know (and our antagonist questioners know) — that races sharing the same territory will eventually mix together into one race. No prominent scholar, political leader, journalist or media figure will admit to such knowledge or acknowledge this fact in public. Not yet. Nor have they in the past. When the governments of the Nordish countries began their policies of multiracialization they did not publicly declare that the ultimate consequence would be the destruction and replacement of the Nordish peoples in their homelands. If the political, economic and cultural establishment leaders who promoted this policy were aware of its consequences, which any competent anthropologist could have told them if they lacked the wit to see for themselves, they certainly did not publicly acknowledge it. Instead, there has been a long record of dissimulation, disinformation, evasion and obfuscation on this matter, a practice that has been so effective that they have never been publicly challenged or questioned on it, so they have not even had to bother to deny it.

The battle for the preservation of the Nordish race has not yet begun, and it will not truly begin until the Nordish people are fully enlightened and informed about what has happened, is happening, and what will happen on the present course, until they are completely aware of their situation, including the fact that it is not inevitable, and that there are alternatives they can choose other than those given them by the multiracialist establishment. Without awareness of all the alternatives and their consequences, without all the relevant information and knowledge, they cannot make an informed choice or decision, and thus far they have not been informed, but have been controlled in a state of ignorance. If the questioner thinks the battle for Nordish preservation is already lost, then challenge him to share this belief publicly, to declare it in a public forum (if the editor will let him) or put it in writing and sign his name to it. If he does it will only help us to overcome the disbelief and incomprehension we most typically encounter in our efforts to make our people more aware. Of course, if he is a person of no prominence (as is typical of those who publicly acknowledge and support the consequences of multiracialism) his words will have little influence. The fact that the prominent and important people who promote multiracialism do not publicly say or admit what this questioner does is our best assurance that we have not yet lost, that our race can still be saved from the destruction they have planned for it if the Nordish people become aware of the situation and the possible alternatives, and that they know this, and fear it, and this is the reason for their silence, evasion and denials.

What kind of pain and discomfort does the questioner mean? Physical pain and discomfort from movements of population to restore the normal and natural condition of racial separation and reproductive isolation required for racial preservation? Tens of millions of people move great distances around this planet every year without physical pain or discomfort. In fact, many millions do it for pleasure. We call them tourists. Modern transportation technology has reduced the discomfort of travel or movement to the point where it is almost solely a matter of attitude. Emotional pain and discomfort? We should of course do everything within reason to minimize this. But this sounds like a claim that it is already too late to save the Nordish race, that the process of multiracialization has already gone too far, so we should give up and accept its destruction and replacement. This is perhaps a bit of wishful thinking on the part of the multiracialists, and more than a little hypocritical, that after minimizing the effects of multiracialism for so many years as a harmless exercise in humanitarianism they should now exaggerate its effects as the reason to claim that the destruction of the Nordish race must now be accepted as irreversible. Of course, the process has not yet gone too far to be reversed. The Nordish race still exists in essentially full and undiminished form. But time is not on our side. Every year the situation worsens and the extent of racial harm and loss increases. So the questioner’s remarks should be taken as reason why we must not delay or fail in our efforts, or before too long his words will be true.



4. REALIZING RACIST [i.e., Racial Preservationist] PHILOSOPHY – TOWARDS PANNORDICA
===================================================

These questions are about how your philosophy can be realized.

4.1) Do you think Ethnostates are a realistic option? In what time? What
are the requirements to set the process of constructing these states in
motion?

4.1 Answer: If by ethnostates you mean the separation of the races into their own independent countries or nation-states, you are referring to the condition required for racial preservation and independence. If they are not a realistic option then racial preservation and independence is not a realistic option. Abraham Lincoln said that no matter how difficult the task, where there is a will there is a way. Certainly it is realistic. As far as the physical capability is concerned, it is very realistic. The races can be separated at least as easily as they were brought together. The question is solely one of human will. If we want and desire ethnostates, if this is our will, then we will have them. The requirement to set the process of constructing them in motion is to let people know they are possible, that they are an alternative, and that they are necessary for racial preservation, thus creating a general will, a consensus of purpose, within our race to realize them.



4.2) Do you think the non-Nordic immigrants in the ancient Nordic
Racelands (i.e. Europe) can be persuaded to leave in peace? What are the
requirements to set this process in motion? What help should we, of
course from a pragmatic point of view, offer them? How large is the
chance it would result in violent conflicts (like Bosnia)?

4.2 Answer: I think the response of the non-Nordish peoples in the Nordish countries to Nordish preservationism will depend in part on their recognition of its moral correctness, and in part on the extent of support the preservationist movement enjoys within the Nordish race itself. The stronger the support within the Nordish race for preservationism the greater the degree of recognition and acceptance it is likely to be given by the non-Nordish peoples. If it achieves majority support within the Nordish race its legitimacy as the expression of the Nordish will would be undeniable and the moral credibility of multiracialism, and the supposed consensus that supports it, would be destroyed. Our hopes for a peaceful resolution of this problem will depend on respecting the legitimate rights and interests of the other races, treating them fairly, providing them with a situation in which their vital rights and interests are not threatened, and by making it clear that preservationist separation is supported by the resolute will of the Nordish race, from which it will not deviate. As we educate members of our own race regarding the reasons for separation, that it is imperative for racial preservation, we will also hopefully educate many members of the other races. If they can be made to understand our motive or reason for seeking separation from them is not to cause them harm, but to secure our continued existence, our most vital and legitimate right and interest, and that this is morally right and proper, and that we have good will toward them, mean them no harm but wish them well, and respect their legitimate rights and interests, certainly some, and hopefully many, among them will do what is right and give us their support. We should do everything within reason to maximize support and minimize opposition, by reducing the reasons or justifications for resistance, not only within our own race, but among the other races also. Certainly the more support we have from the other races in this undertaking the easier it will be, and the better will be the relations between the races afterwards.



4.3) At the beginning of DOA [Destiny of Angels] you state that deterrence without a real
capability to withstand hostile aggression from outside is not enough to
secure the interests of the Race. What if the Racial Golden Rule is not
accepted by all other races, or if it is accepted only by Northerners?
If one or more races are not content with having the wealth supply from
the North cut off and begin to rearm and express hostility towards the
North and thereby acquire a capability to strike through the defensive
measures of the North, how would the North respond to such a threat, or
potential threat?

4.3 Answer: It would of course be better if the principles of racial relations expressed by the Racial Compact and the Racial Golden Rule were implemented multilaterally rather than unilaterally, but we should be prepared to implement them unilaterally for the protection of our own interests if necessary. Recognition of the right of each race to exist is the necessary basis for trust and good will in the relations between races. Any race which refused to recognize, and act in accordance with, this right should not be permitted to prevent or interfere with the achievement of our goal of racial preservation and independence. If the Nordish race can achieve its independence united and with its strength intact, it should be capable of defending itself against external threats.



4.4) Are there any organizations today that come close to your
philosophy? Which organizations are closest? Have you been able to exert
any influence to change and broaden the mindset of any organizations or
other political forces?

4.5 Answer: I do not know of any existing organization that approaches my philosophy. I presume such an organization remains to be created. Most existing racialist organizations, and those who belong to them, have an existing mindset which is difficult to change. The problem is that this mindset is often a part of our problem, as it is a mindset that does not appeal to the great majority of our race, but rather alienates and repels most of the high quality people, as well as the masses of more ordinary people, we must attract if we are to gain the broad popular support we need to save our race. Often their goals and methods are such that they do not openly acknowledge them as they would instantly alienate all but the most fanatical supporters. This shapes their strategic outlook, causing them to accept as conventional wisdom the assumption that conditions for our race will have to get much worse before they are likely to attract a wide degree of support, as people would have to be terribly desperate or enraged to accept their program. This makes them dependent on external events, on something outside themselves and beyond their control, on something that will make large numbers of our race terribly desperate, on something that will probably never happen or happen only when it is too late, when the situation of the Nordish race has deteriorated to the point where it is no longer capable of saving itself. This tends to engender a passive rather than active stance, as they assume there is little they can do until hoped for external events change the situation. They do not consider changing their program, the alternative they offer, to make it an alternative people can accept now, under present conditions, as preferable to the present multiracialist course. To use a metaphor, the patient will have to be very sick indeed before he will accept the medicine they offer as a cure. If they offered a medicine that was palatable they would not meet such resistance from the patient, and might be able to save him before he dies.



4.5) The organization which, according to some, is the most progressive
and forceful today, is the National Alliance. How do you regard them?
How do you regard Dr. William Pierce and his strategic outlook? The
chapter Right and Wrong Racism from TRC [The Racial Compact] can certainly not be used to
describe the Alliance’s outlook on racial relations.

4.5 Answer: I cannot claim to speak for Dr. Pierce, so I would not presume to attribute ideas to him that I have not seen explicitly expressed in his writing. Regarding his strategic outlook, he is one of those who have expressed the conventional racialist wisdom (as noted in my response to the previous question) that conditions will have to get much worse before he expects his movement to gather wide support. If his cure is similar to the course he describes in his novel The Turner Diaries conditions would have to get very bad indeed, perhaps even as bad as he imagines in his novel, before many would be willing to support it. I for one certainly hope that the situation of our race never comes to such desperate straits, where such extreme and desperate measures are taken by such desperate men and women.



4.6) What are the major weaknesses of those organizations and forces
opposed to the currently dominant multiculturalist power structure?

4.6 Answer: I think my responses to the previous two questions provide part of the answer for this question as well, but I will elaborate. One common weakness or flaw I find in many organizations is that they do not adequately recognize the primary problem — that the issue is nothing less than racial survival, that the continued existence of our race is at stake — and this causes them to greatly understate the severity of our problem and the measures necessary to correct it. These organizations either evade or deny the reality of this problem — in which they essentially echo the multiracialist power structure itself — or they belittle it as not likely to be of serious concern for the foreseeable future. They therefore concentrate their attentions on the lesser or secondary problems of multiracialism, which can theoretically be solved by means other than separation. Obviously, as they do not recognize the primary problem confronting the Nordish race from multiracialism, but effectively ignore it, they do not propose an alternative that would provide a solution to it. As far as racial preservationism is concerned, they do not address the issue and have no message to offer. They are still in the dark, still unaware, still clueless, about what is happening to their race. They cannot see that the issue is nothing less than the continued existence of their race. In this they are similar to the majority of their race as a whole, and it might help wake them to the real situation if they were introduced to some of the people who ask the kind of nihilist questions I answered above in section 3.

A subset of this type of organization is one that claims to support racial preservation, and even says its advocates separation, but proposes as a solution an alternative that is inadequate, where the races are either not separated geographically into their own countries and governments, but only by voluntary social arrangements, or where only a survivalist fraction of the race is separated into a small homeland while the great majority of the race is left to perish from the consequences of multiracialism. Such proposals are perhaps hampered by an effort to conform to individualist libertarian sensibilities, but they are inadequate to achieve racial preservation and independence, and represent another attempt to evade the true extent of the problem.

Another type of organization, which the multiracialist power structure typically claims represents the only form of racial thought, which all racialist thinkers supposedly adhere to regardless of what they might say to the contrary, is that of the supremacist or even genocidal variety. This type does not recognize or respect the rights or interests of other races. It may recognize the seriousness of the situation, but does not recognize the fact that racial preservation does not require measures that cause harm to other races, and that it therefore certainly cannot be used to justify such harm. The measures they advocate are typically violent and harsh, and not necessary for preservationist purposes, and thus apparently motivated by and serving some other purpose. They often identify themselves with “Nazism” (National Socialism), a nationalist political movement that violated the rights of other nations and races, and whose actions were in no way related to the legitimate goals of racial preservation. Such organizations are now commonly called “hate groups,” and this term often has some validity when applied to them. The multiracialists claim that all racialist thought, even advocacy of racial preservation and racial rights, really belongs to this category, as they refuse to recognize the possible existence of alternative forms of racialism that are morally and intellectually credible and capable of attracting broad popular support. Unfortunately, they have been very successful at this, and are actually assisted by the activities of these racialist organizations and their members, who are widely perceived as the only representatives of racialist thought and action, but who in fact only do their race a great disservice, and the multiracialists a great service, by alienating the great majority of their race from pro-racial values. Most people know of nothing else, so the multiracialists are able to claim that these groups represent the only alternative to their policies, and equate any resistance or opposition to, or disagreement with, their policies with support for the policies of these groups. Thus the slightest expression of opposition to the multiracialist program can cause the speaker to be associated with Nazism and its crimes. Under such a blackout of racial information, where people know of no alternative to multiracialism and its consequences other than the quasi-Nazi groups, it is common for those who are most determined to oppose multiracialism to join these groups. We need to provide another alternative, another choice, a constructive course of action for those who want to save the Nordish race.

I would summarize by saying that the racial activist organizations I know of either have not adopted a comprehensive preservationist philosophy that outlines an adequate preservationist alternative, or they have not adopted one that is in accord with the moral sensibilities and values of the majority of our race, which is required to attract the broad popular support needed if we are to have any realistic chance of saving our race from the destructive effects of multiracialism.



4.7) Are there any non-Nordish / non-White countries or organizations
you know off that could be expected to welcome the philosophy of The
Racial Compact? For instance, Japan, or the Nation of Islam?

4.7 Answer: Most of the non-European peoples of the world already follow policies that are in their racial interest, although they might not express these policies in a formal racialist philosophy. I suspect many Japanese would broadly agree with the principles of the Racial Compact. The Nation of Islam talks about racial separation and independence but I do not know how firm their support for this would be if really given a choice. That choice would separate the true Black Nationalists from those who are only jiving.



5. THE PROMOTION OF YOUR PHILOSOPHY
===================================

5.1) In your books you express your philosophical outlook, but can you
say something about your strategical outlook? How shall we win the
hearts and minds of the Nordish people, how should the message be conveyed and
how can we find and reach out to the right people?

5.1 Answer: We need to reach people with our message by whatever means we can think of and whatever means are available. I started with books and magazine articles, both of very limited distribution. Now the internet is available so I am on-line, and I hope it will prove a great medium of communication for our cause. With sufficient people to do the work, pamphlets and leaflets are also a useful tool. We should use every means that we can. But first we must have the right message, or all our efforts will be futile and ineffective.

Our efforts should be ultimately geared toward political action. Election campaigns are great educational tools. Our mission is to convince our people to vote for the salvation, the continued existence, the preservation and independence, of their race. Thus simply stated, this seems like it should be a “no-brainer,” absurdly simple, yet in our current near “Twilight Zone” type of situation it is perilously difficult, so much so that many say it is already too late. To achieve this mission we must first establish our moral and intellectual credibility and integrity in the minds of the electorate. We must make them aware both of the racially destructive consequences of multiracialism, the present course, and the preservationist alternative that we offer, which we should describe in as much detail as is reasonably possible. This will define our position, which we must do for ourselves or we can be sure our opponents — masters of disinformation — will be happy to do it for us, much to our disfavor. Our position might displease many people, especially at first when they have not yet thought through the alternatives, but it will be much more favorable to us than the position the opposition will try to ascribe to us. We should promote the Charter of Racial Rights, making it clear that our movement respects and supports the legitimate rights and interests of all the other races and means them no harm, that we are against the legitimate rights of no race, that we want the same consideration from other races for our legitimate rights, that we do not want those who think otherwise to be part of our movement, and that any who behave otherwise will be excluded. We must make it clear that we condemn acts of illegal violence and terrorism, and that such acts do not promote the preservationist cause.

We should gain control of the issues by making our issue the defining issue that must be addressed and answered by every politician and public figure, compelling them to state their position on the question of Nordish racial preservation and independence, permitting no evasion or denial, no place for them to hide from the issue any longer. Those anti-Nordish racial nihilists of lesser prominence who have antagonized us with their explicit calls for the extinction of our race will then prove to be a source of embarrassment for their more prominent co-nihilists, as their careless language will come back to haunt them and undermine their efforts to deny the consequences of the course they have set us on. Eventually, when a sufficient level of situational awareness is achieved by the public, the position of the multiracialist power structure will be morally and intellectually discredited, and its consensus of general support will dissolve. That, at least, is what I would like to see happen. There is a saying that if you build a church the people will come to fill it. We must build a movement on a good foundation, on the right message, a comprehensive philosophy of racial relations, and then hope that the right people, good people, will come to fill it.



5.2) How many copies of your books have been printed and sold?

5.2 Answer: Not nearly enough! Books are very expensive, especially for someone like myself who has limited resources. They are also difficult to distribute, especially if you cannot afford to advertise. Although I am a dedicated bibliophile, and nothing can replace the tangible physical experience of a book, the internet is much cheaper, and if we use it well, it will hopefully enable us to break through the distribution barriers faced by books.



5.3) What kind of, and how many, responses to your books do you get?

5.3 Answer: One difference between the internet and books — the responses I get from book readers is nearly always very positive, while the responses to my website are divided fairly evenly between pro and con. Some of the con responses are very interesting and informative in revealing the opposition thought processes, others are from “flamers” who are often so hostile they cannot express their argument in a rational or civil manner. Some responses are “off the wall” and quite eccentric, but this applies to some of the book readers as well.



5.4) Thus far, none of us know of your work being especially featured by
racial preservationist organizations — it could be and should be much
wider known! How is the dissemination of your writings and philosophy
going and what strata seem most susceptible?

5.4 Answer: The seeds are being sown, and some are bearing fruit, but it is a painfully slow process with very limited resources. Generally, the most susceptible strata consists of highly intelligent and aware people who share one essential trait in common — the continued existence and well-being of their race is important to them. They are those who love their race and care about its future, which is what one would expect. But thus far only a tiny fraction of even that strata has any awareness of my philosophy.



5.5) What kind of assistance would you most warmly welcome? What do you
think could cause a major breakthrough of this philosophy in important
segments?

5.5 Answer: All kinds of assistance would be welcome, all contributions gladly accepted. We need all the resources we can get, without forgetting that what we are really after is people, and that all other resources are merely a means to reach and hopefully get more people. It all boils down to a matter of people, of people supporting with their contributions, time, effort and votes the continued existence of their race. Every person we get to support our cause is a breakthrough. A major breakthrough would involve getting the support of a major person, a person of important standing who would attract publicity and create legitimacy. For me personally the ultimate assistance would be acquiring the means to devote all my time to the preservationist cause rather than spending most of my time having to work for a living. We will not really have a movement until it can afford to support a group of dedicated full-time activists and spokespeople.



5.6) The Charter of Racial Rights that you designed seems like it could
be promoted very well in our contemporary society (as the way it is
shaped — a declaration of human rights — is something the altruist
egalitarian, anti-Nordish forces within western civilization, are not
trained to deal with immediately, although we can be sure that at one
point they’ll come up with some counteroffensive). But what strategy do you
think would be best to promote it? Could it be sent to certain
institutions, and/or organizations, and/or individuals (and of course
which institutions / organizations / individuals) ?

5.6 Answer: It was designed to stand alone and be easily understood by most people, appealing to their most basic sense of what is fair and good. It can be nailed to a door like Luther’s theses, stuck on a wall, passed out to passersby, read aloud at a meeting, mailed to just about anyone, or posted on a website. It would be interesting to see how the multiracialists might attempt to counter it, but that does not worry me. I am much more concerned that they will ignore it, that the culture will ignore it, and not enough people will learn of it to create a critical mass sufficient to have an effect. That is their most likely means of countering it.



6. THE NEAR FUTURE
==================

6.1) Are you, apart from the additional articles on your web site,
working on anything specific now? A new book maybe? Is there one
planned?

6.1 Answer: A book is a major project in terms of both time and other resources, and most critically of all, of ideas. I do not have a book in the works at this time, but I am developing some ideas for new articles, which I will put on my website.

Richard McCulloch
October 30, 1998



Return to Racial Compact main page
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #23
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Racial Preservation: Issues and Answers
Racial Preservation: Issues and Answers

Correspondence, commentary and discussion by Richard McCulloch on the issues, questions, problems and challenges frequently encountered by proponents of racial preservation and independence.



1. An American-Swedish Dialogue on Racial Issues — E-Mail of Richard McCulloch with a Swedish correspondent discussing the racial situation in Sweden and common issues confronting Nordish racial preservationists in Europe and America.

2. An American-Dutch Dialogue on Racial Issues — E-Mail of Richard McCulloch with a Dutch correspondent discussing the racial situation in the Netherlands and common issues confronting Nordish racial preservationists in Europe and America.

3. E-Mail from Opponents of Nordish Racial Preservation — Selections of correspondence from opponents of Nordish racial preservation with replies and commentary by Richard McCulloch.

4. The Reality of Race — Discussion and commentary regarding the claims by racial deconstructionists that the races of humanity are not real.

5. The Issue of Racial Intermixture and “Impurity” — Correspondence and commentary on claims that the Nordish peoples are racially mixed and “impure”.

6. The Ethnic Gap — Discussion of the Euro gap, the racial gap between northern and southern Europeans, describing it, considering its implications for Nordish preservationist policy, and replying to some of the criticisms prompted by this distinction.

Return to Racial Compact Main Page
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #24
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Reality of Race
The Reality of Race Discussion and commentary regarding the claims by racial deconstructionists that the races of humanity are not real
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:49:34 -0400
From: “D.B.” in U.S.A.

In a correspondence dated June 27, 1990, professor Philip M. Peek (chairman,
anthropology department Drew University) responded to questions I had
concerning phenotypic similarities/differences concerning Nordics and
Mediterraneans. He replied “Since the advent of molecular biology (and its
offshoot, “molecular anthropology”), however, few human biologists base
racial classifications on any criteria that cannot be shown to be genotypic.
Many, such as Ashley Montagu and Frank Livingston, have abandoned all
biotaxic classifications of hominids below the species level. They therefore
deny the validity of the very concept of race as biological (rather than a
cultural) reality.” So… are we in the minority here?

__________________________________________________________________
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:08:50 -0400
From: “A. P.” in South Africa

Undoubtedly we are in the minority, but it depends more on political than
scientific reasons. Today it is “politically correct” to deny the importance
or the existence of human races, and, as prof. Philippe Rushton states,
every effort is made to deconstruct its very concept. Of course it’s not the
first time in history that ideology influences and hinders science. As for
the genetic studies, they are by far too incomplete and limited to
substitute for traditional physical anthropology, despite the claims of the
current cultural elites.
A.P.

______________________________________________________

Richard McCulloch’s reply and commentary,

To the above remarks by Professor Peep I would add the following excerpts from a newspaper article entitled “Scientists: Idea of Race is Only Skin Deep,” by Robert Boyd in the Miami Herald (Oct. 13, 1996; p. 14A):

WASHINGTON — Thanks to spectacular advances in molecular biology and genetics, most scientists now reject the concept of race as a valid way to divide human beings into separate groups. Contrary to widespread public opinion, researchers no longer believe that races are distinct biological categories created by differences in the genes that people inherit from their parents….”Race has no basic biological reality,” said Jonathan Marks, a Yale University biologist….Instead, a majority of biologists and anthropologists, drawing on a growing body of evidence accumulated since the 1970s, have concluded that race is a social, cultural and political concept based largely on superficial appearances. “In the social sense race is a reality. In the scientific sense, it is not,” said Michael Omi, a specialist in ethnic studies at the University of California at Berkeley.

The idea that races are not the product of human genes may seem to contradict common sense. “The average citizen reacts with frank disbelief when told there is no such thing as race,” said C. Loring Brace, an anthropologist at the University of Michigan. “The skeptical layman will shake his head and regard this as further evidence of the innate silliness of those who call themselves intellectuals.”

The new understanding of race draws on work in many fields. “Vast new data in human biology, prehistory and paleontology…have completely revamped the traditional notions,” said Solomon Katz, an anthropologist at the University of Pennsylvania. This is a switch from the prevailing dogma of the 19th and much of the 20th century. During that period most scientists believed that humans could be sorted into a few…inherited racial types….As recently as 1985, anthropologists split 50-50 when one of their number, Leonard Lieberman of Central Michigan University, asked in a survey if they believe in the existence of separate biological races….As a sign of the change, Lieberman said most anthropology textbooks published in this decade [the 1990s] have stopped teaching the concept of biological race….[T]he revised concept of race…reflects recent scientific work with DNA….”We are beginning to get good data at the DNA level,” said a Yale geneticist, Kenneth Kidd….[which]“support the concept that you can’t draw boundaries around races.”
This is really a matter of semantics, a word game of political correctness. The motive can be easily understood. The ideology of racial nihilism, which always minimized the importance or value of race and racial differences, is now dominant enough to attempt to deny the very reality of race, as it seeks the destruction of race. The dominant elements in academia and the culture do not want race to exist so they deny its existence as scientifically invalid, engaging in a willing suspension of disbelief regarding the claims that “there is no such thing as race,” as if they can wish race into nonexistence by pretending it does not exist. They claim that race is only a cultural or political “construct,” an arbitrary creation of society that people believe exists only because they are taught to believe it exists, and that if people were not taught about race they would be unaware of it and it would be deconstructed, ceasing to exist. But since race actually is objectively real, a fact that people can see for themselves without any need to be taught, then its deconstruction actually requires that they be taught that it is not real, and does not really exist, in spite of what they see to the contrary. The role of supposed “experts,” possessors of superior and secret knowledge to whom ordinary people must defer, is central to this process, as described in Hans Christian Andersen’s classic tale of The Emperor’s New Clothes.

It is noteworthy that a valid definition of race is given in the above article, i.e., “races are distinct biological categories created by differences in the genes that people inherit from their parents.” This is not typical of racial deconstructionists. More commonly they neglect to give a valid definition of race even as they attempt to define race out of existence. Without a definition there is no point or standard of reference from which to judge the merits of their claims. Often race is confused with species, and wrongly defined as essentially the same as a species (i.e., as including all populations fully capable of interbreeding), and as there is only one human species and therefore different human species do not exist, if race is defined similarly then there is only one human race and different races cannot exist. But a race is not a species, and should not be defined the same as a species. It is a subdivision of a species, or subspecies, created by the divergent evolution of isolated populations of a species in the same process that eventually produces new species. I offer three dictionary definitions that represent the mainstream of pre-1990s opinion so the reader can judge whether the populations they define are real or not.

1.) “Any of the …biological divisions of mankind, distinguished by [features of physical appearance]. ” Webster’s New World Dictionary (1966)

2.) “[A] group of persons connected by common descent, blood, or heredity….characterized by a more or less unique combination of physical traits which are transmitted in descent.” The American College Dictionary (1969)

3.) “A local geographic or global human population distinguished as a more or less distinct group by genetically transmitted physical characteristics.” Reader’s Digest Illustrated Encyclopedic Dictionary (1987)

Next in order is a review of the definition of race offered in the above article, by which definition the reality of race is denied, i.e., “races are distinct biological categories created by differences in the genes that people inherit from their parents.” What part of this is not real?

Are the races not “distinct,” e.g., can one not distinguish one race from another? Can one not easily distinguish indigenous Northern European, Central African or Northeast Asian individuals and populations from each other? I think the answer to this is obvious. Of course, these are probably the three most distinct racial types, representing the specialized extremes of a tripolar human racial typology. The main problem with racial typology is that there are so many different types, so much diversity, to be classified and typed, depending on how specific (and accurate) you want to be. The other races tend to be more generalized and not so physically distinct as these three, yet even a slight degree of familiarity with almost any race normally enables one to readily distinguish it from any other, and certainly the members of any race usually have no difficulty distinguishing themselves from any other race. Exceptions may exist, but they are rare and not the rule, and if anything only tend to prove the rule. A population that cannot be distinguished from other populations by its physical or racial traits should not be classified as a separate race. There are also many hybrid individuals and populations, the result of racial intermixture, that cannot be properly classified as belonging to any one race. But because they cannot be classified as belonging to any one particular race does not mean that races do not exist, only that these individuals or populations should be classified as being a hybrid or mixed blend of two or more races.

Are the races not “created by differences in the genes that people inherit from their parents,” i.e., are not racial traits genetically determined and genetically transmitted from parents to their offspring? Again, I think the answer is obvious, and is as true for races as it is for any taxonomic or biological category. The most ordinary observation confirms that racial traits are clearly transmitted from generation to generation, from parents to their offspring, and are solely determined by this transmission, and not by any external or environmental influence. (Marxist dislike of this fact caused the Soviet Union to promote the contrary theory of “Lysenkoism,” which held that traits acquired from the environment could be inherited by subsequent generations, and which may be enjoying an implicit revival among Neo-Marxist racial nihilists in the West.) This was known long before there was any knowledge of genes, and therefore any accurate knowledge of the actual means of transmission. We now know that genes are the means of transmission of all physical traits, including racial traits, from the structure of the brain to the features of the face and the pigmentation and texture of the epidermis. If these traits are not genetically transmitted then how are they transmitted? I don’t know of any other credible explanation for the observed transmission of racial traits from parents to their offspring other than the genetic one, and I doubt that any anthropologist or biologist is explicitly offering one.

Are the races not “biological categories,” i.e., are they not biological entities, and is their existence not a biological phenomenon? One more time, the answer is obvious. Genes are a biological phenomenon, a part of biology, and probably the most fundamental part. If different races are “created by differences in the genes” then they are biological categories. Specifically, they are a category below the category of species. Also, races are a product of the biological process of evolution. They were created by the same process of divergent evolution — the branching of life into different forms that occurs when populations are isolated from each other, usually due to geographic separation — that created all the biological diversity, or biodiversity, of life on earth. Races are part of that biological diversity. Races are a necessary part of biological evolution. They are the first step in the differentiation or divergence of life into distinctly different forms, the means by which different species are created. They are the stage of evolution a diverging or differentiating population must go through as it develops into separate species. If there were no races there would be no divergent evolution and differentiation of life into separate species.

What did Kenneth Kidd mean when he said, “you can’t draw boundaries around races,” with the inference that this means races are not real? This sounds like a reference to the fact that the different races of humanity can and do interbreed, that there are no biological or genetic boundaries separating them from intermixture with other races, and hybrid populations or “clines” of intermediate, racially mixed type do exist. But that is why they are defined as races and not as different species, which are separated by biological or genetic boundaries which make them unable to interbreed and produce hybrid populations. Races do not have to be incapable of interbreeding with other races to be considered genetically and biologically real or distinct. If they were they would be classified as species, not races. The fact that hybrid populations or clines exist means that the different populations of humanity are different races, not different species. The matter of clines has been too much abused by those who seek to use them to deny the existence of different races. The existence of clines proves that all humans are part of the same species, not part of the same race. Indeed, one would expect clines to exist within a species consisting of different races. Also, the existence of clines actually implies the existence of races, as how could there be clines of intermediate types between races if there were no races?

Or, alternatively, perhaps Kidd’s remark is a reference to the fact that because of hybridization or intermixture there are no clear dividing lines or boundaries between the races, but instead a continuum of individuals and populations forming a gradient or cline of gradually changing racial type between the races, so choosing a single point on this continuum of intermediate racial types as a boundary or dividing line between the distinct races at the two ends of the continuum must be somewhat arbitrary, as the types that are located on each side of the dividing line will be more similar, and more closely related, to the type next to them on the other side of the dividing line than they are to the distinct type at the far end of their side of the line. But the existence of a cline or continuous range of intermediate or hybridized racial types between two distinct races does not mean that there is no distinct difference between the two races at the polar ends of the racial continuum. As with any continuum of type, or space or time, the two ends of the continuum are the most distinct from each other, while any two intermediate points on the continuum are less distinct from each other. To suggest that the absence of clear boundary points along a continuum (which is a defining characteristic of a continuum) is evidence that the distinct ends of the continuum do not really exist, and cannot be clearly distinguished from each other, is the product of either simplistic thinking or semantic obfuscation. The solution to this apparent dilemma is to “step out of the box” constructed by false logic and recognize that it is arbitrary to insist on dividing a continuum of gradually changing types into just two parts, when three or more parts — the two distinct parts and one or more intermediate parts — would be a more accurate description of reality. The logical error; or intellectual dishonesty, is only compounded when this arbitrarily imposed inaccuracy is then used as an argument to deny the reality — the existence — of the distinct races at the ends of the continuum.

The different races, like species, are biological and genetic entities. Their distinguishing traits are genetic traits, meaning that they are genetically determined and genetically transmitted or passed through the generations, by inherited genes, from the parents to the children, from one generation to another, and thus, despite the denials in the Miami Herald article, obviously “created by differences in the genes that people inherit from their parents.” Thus racial traits are genetic traits, and genetic traits are biological traits. Thus race is genetically and biologically based or determined, and thus genetically and biologically real. This is obvious for everyone to see, so obvious that no so-called scientist or expert can credibly or believably deny it, and why denials elicit disbelief by those still in possession of common sense, and are accepted only by those who engage in a “willing suspension of disbelief” in order to conform to the dictates of “political correctness.” Leonard Lieberman’s survey of belief, mentioned in the Miami Herald article, is an obvious tool for inculcating and enforcing political correctness or ideological conformity of belief.

Those who claim race is not real cannot see the forest for the trees. They concentrate on the building blocks and cannot see the building. Thus they make statements such as “all blood is red” or the same color, or all people have the same organs inside, or we are all the same under the skin, etc. (although racial appearance is determined by bone, cartilage and muscle as well as skin, hair and eyes) to make the point that racial differences are not important, as only the building blocks or components are important, not their arrangement or what they form. A physicist I knew in college liked to say that at the sub-atomic level of neutrons, electrons and protons all matter is essentially indistinguishable, and at that level a non-specialist could not determine the difference between a human or a piece of rock, and he was right. Thus anthropologists now adhere to the politically correct racial nihilist dogma of racial denial by stating that at the molecular level of DNA or genes the different races are essentially indistinguishable, and only a specialist could hope to do so. But our senses do not operate at the molecular level, or at the level of our various internal organs, but at the level of the complete being they form, not at the micro level of the component parts (or building blocks) but at the macro level of their completed arrangement or construction. It is this complete construction that those who seek to deconstruct race deny is real, on the grounds that the differences seen in the complete or macro form in which our senses operate cannot be seen by a non-specialist at the micro level of its component parts. The Nordish race is as real as all the individual members who comprise it, who form its existence. They are the Nordish race, and the undeniable reality of their existence is also the undeniable reality of its existence.

This brings us to the important subject of the criteria for racial classification. In order of importance, they are:

1.) Phenotype: the subject’s physical appearance, especially facial features and other obvious physical racial markers. This is the means used by people from time immemorial to identify and define race. Different people, based on their study, awareness, experience and aptitude, have different degrees of ability in this area, yet nearly all people of normal ability can easily distinguish between the primary racial types, and most can also distinguish between the subtypes with which they are most familiar (e.g., Englishmen can usually distinguish between a number of the more common English subtypes). The ability to make these distinctions is to some extent unconscious, seeming somewhat unscientific, subjective and almost intuitive, yet it is an inherent human ability constantly used to identify many common things which are familiar to us, and was used for racial identification long before anyone attempted to construct scientific criteria for this purpose.

2.) Anthropometrics: the subject’s measurements and the indices derived therefrom. This requires some simple measuring tools and expertise in their use, but the results can be cross-checked and verified to a significant degree by the unaided but experienced eye. Carleton Coon, like many classical physical anthropologists of the first half of the 20th century, belonged to what could be called the anthropometric school. Unfortunately, when anthropometrics are given priority over phenotype in classification the result can be a subject classified as something which they don’t really look like. Thus Coon’s reference to exotic Nordic types, from places far removed from the Nordic centers, who conform to the Nordic anthropometric indices but really don’t “look” Nordic in appearance. When there is an inconsistency between phenotypic and anthropometric classification the phenotypic appearance should generally be given priority. The fact is that a person’s physical appearance or phenotype involves much more than is measured by all the different anthropometric indices. There are probably hundreds, if not thousands, of subtle, genetically determined things we notice almost unconsciously about a person’s face that are not measured by any of the anthropometric indices of facial features, and this is also true of other areas of the body. This makes phenotype a much more accurate and comprehensive method of racial classification than all the anthropometric measurements yet devised. Anthropometrics originally began more as the measurement and study of the differences between the known European subraces than as a method for classifying or reclassifying them, and I believe it was improper to elevate it to the primary means of racial classification with precedence over phenotype. Anthropometrics should be seen as an aid to assist in phenotypic classification in difficult cases, perhaps casting the deciding vote in case of a phenotypic impasse, rather than as something that replaces or takes precedence over it.

3. Genetics: This measurement of molecular phenomena is based on something that is effectively invisible and unknown to the human senses. It is subject to the most abuse as the layman has no means of independently evaluating, verifying or checking the claims made by the supposed expert geneticist, as to do so would require extensive laboratory facilities and equipment, samples, and specialized scientific expertise. As a result, the claims are essentially taken on faith or trust in the competence and honesty of the experts, and can be easily misinterpreted, selectively reported or even falsified. Therefore genetic measurements should be regarded with suspicion when they are inconsistent with more visible means of classification. Also, geneticists do not yet really know what specific genes are involved in the determination of those traits which constitute the racial phenotype, so their measurements do not really involve those genes which are actually racially determinative but arbitrarily selected genes that determine genetic traits that are often really racially neutral (e.g., blood factors, etc.) and are present in all races, basing their measurements on the different frequencies of these genes in different populations.

Since the particular genetic traits that the geneticists measure are present in all human populations and races, varying only in frequency, and they have not yet identified the specific genes responsible for the inherited traits that distinguish the different races and are thus unique to a particular race, genetics is thus far only of very limited and questionable value as a means of racial classification. (Although forensic scientists can now fairly accurately identify a subject’s racial ancestry from DNA samples.) To base a system of racial classification on it, as is perhaps most famously done by Luigi Cavalli-Sforza and his collaborators, can lead to some gross inaccuracies. For example, Cavalli-Sforza’s widely reproduced chart of genetic distances between populations (“The History and Geography of Human Genes,” page 78, Figure 2.3.2.B) groups the Japanese, Koreans and Mongols in a common category with Europeans while grouping the south Chinese in a different category with Polynesians, etc., indicating greater genetic distance between Japanese and southern Chinese than between Japanese and Europeans. Simply put, the particular genetic traits he uses for racial classification are more similar in Northeast Asians and Europeans than they are in Northeast Asians and Southeast Asians. This result should have set off alarm bells, clearly discrediting these genetic traits as irrelevant for the purpose of racial classification, but the genetic anthropologists persist in their use. Given this logical, or illogical, paradigm, is it any wonder that the genetic anthropologists come to the conclusion that the different races don’t really exist, because they don’t really exist in the particular genes they use for their studies?

We have not yet found the specific genes that determine race and racial differences, yet we know the traits that differentiate the races are real and are genetically determined, inherited from the parents and earlier ancestors, and from this readily observable and consistent fact we logically (and scientifically) deduce the existence of those genes. It is scientific arrogance, and very arbitrary, illogical and unscientific, to claim — as the genetic anthropologists referred to by Prof. Peek do about race — that something does not exist, is not scientifically valid, and is not real until science can fully understand and explain it, or in his words, that racial classifications cannot be based “on any criteria that cannot be shown to be genotypic.” What is the standard for “shown?” It is obvious to the most normal observation that the physical traits or criteria that are popularly used for racial classification or identification, with virtually error-free accuracy, are consistently and predictably inherited from the parents and passed through the generations. The only possible logical deduction is that these inherited traits are genetically transmitted, and that they are genotypic, even if they cannot yet be “shown to be genotypic” in the sense of being identified, observed in action and fully understood and explained at the genetic level. Such an extreme standard or requirement for scientific acceptance is arbitrary and illogical. Scientific explanations for most common and easily observable phenomena are very recent, yet those phenomena — those facts of nature and reality — existed and were no less real before they had a scientific explanation, and were accepted as real by science, regardless of whether their underlying existence was proved or their nature understood. Things exist and are real independent of our scientific understanding of them, otherwise nothing would have existed until quite recently. Science is the study of reality, not the creator of reality.

Attempts to minimize or trivialize race and racial differences as meaningless and unimportant — or even nonexistent — on the grounds that the races share 99.9% of their genetic code or genome in common sound impressive until put in perspective with regard to the degree of human genetic similarity with other life forms. For example, we share 20-30% of our genetic code in common with yeast and bacteria, 80% in common with birds, 90% in common with non-primate mammals (e.g., cows, horses, pigs, cats, dogs, raccoons, etc.), and 98.6% in common with chimpanzees. Seen in this perspective a .1% genetic difference actually looms large as a degree of difference that is very meaningful and important.

The active or functional part of the human genome or genetic code consists of about 22,000 genes (2007 estimates) containing about 87 million “genetic letters,” or nucleotide base pairs of DNA (DioxyriboNucleicAcid), of the total of about 2.9 billion base pairs in the complete human genome, or an average of about 4,000 genetic base pairs or “letters” per gene. The races of the human species share 99.9% of their 2.9 billion genetic base pairs in common, with genetic differences in .1% of the base pairs, a proportion which represents about 2.9 million genetic differences in the genome, or 87,000 genetic differences in the genes, or an average of four differences in genetic base pairs per gene. A single difference in the genetic base pairs or coding of a gene can significantly alter its effect, so a .1% difference in the genetic code could theoretically change the effect of virtually every gene in the genome. Seen in this perspective, as in the perspective in the preceding paragraph, a .1% genetic difference actually looms large as a degree of difference that is very meaningful and important.

The common argument that there is a greater degree of genetic variation within a race than between races is so misleading as to be suspect of deliberate deception. First, those who use this argument (frequently citing Luigi Cavalli-Sforza et. al. as their authority) often fail to state that the genetic difference between races they are referring to is in the racial average of the given traits. Thus what they should be saying is that the difference between the average in the given genetic traits between two races is less than the degree of variation in those traits within each race. Of course, to a thoughtful person this should be obvious, as it is logically impossible for there to be less variation in a given trait in two races than in one race. But leaving out the fact that they are comparing the full extremes of variation in a genetic trait within one race with the difference between the averages of that trait in two races is like leaving out the fact that one is comparing apples and oranges, and that such a comparision is not really very meaningful. Second, and most important, the genetic traits they use for these comparisons are not among those that are racially definitive and determinative, the traits on which racial identity is based and that are unique to each race, but among those that are not racially definitive or determining, that are racially neutral, and thus not really racially meaningful. The same argument could be used in a comparison of humans with chimpanzees, as the degree of difference between the average of humans and chimpanzees in the genetic traits they share in common is less than the degree of difference or variation in those traits within the human or chimpanzee species. It is the genetic traits that the human races do not share in common that determine the differences between them, just as it is the genetic traits that humans and chimpanzees do not share in common that determine the differences between them, and these are the only traits that are meaningful or important when discussing the differences between races and species.

At the risk of being repetitive, I’d like to add something I wrote on this subject to another correspondent. A political analysis is necessary because the ultimate motive for denying the reality of race is itself purely political in origin, not scientific.

The claim that races don’t really exist, ludicrous and absurd as it is, is being encountered with increasing frequency, and is central to the cause of racial preservation, so we have to take it seriously and expose it for what it is: an exercise in thought control to impose an incredible falsehood as politically correct orthodox dogma to which all must conform or suffer condemnation and reprisal [cf. Lieberman's survey of belief cited in the Miami Herald article above]. The purpose can only be to eradicate every vestigial trace of European racial consciousness and awareness. Thus a person of European racial type can’t love or care for their race, or have any loyalty or positive feelings or emotions towards it, as these feelings are based on racial consciousness which the dominant culture condemns as politically incorrect, and even pathologizes as mental illness. This tactic is ineffective on persons with a high degree of intellectual and moral autonomy, but people of less independent thought — who depend upon the opinions of experts for their own opinions, yet characteristically and perversely regard themselves as superior to the independent thinkers — are easy to control.

Personally, I trust what I can see with my own eyes over any claim to the contrary. I was well aware of primary racial differences before the age of eight, even though they weren’t discussed in my home and I had no special training or education in this matter. The reality of race was simply self-evident: I could effortlessly see it with my eyes. I could also easily associate racial types with the appropriate areas of the world from which they derive. At age eight, when I saw the movie “The Bridge Over the River Kwai,” I understood and could identify the racial distinction between the Japanese and British soldiers, even without their uniforms, and if a Briton had been cast as a Japanese, or vice versa, I would have instantly recognized that as improper. My racial identification process had nothing to do with the subject’s blood type, cephalic index, IQ, height, or numerous genetic variables, although some of these can be seen with the eye while others cannot. You could provide me with all this information about a person and I wouldn’t be able to identify their race, but show me a good picture of them and I can identify them most readily (and could when I was eight years old, although I wasn’t as aware of the finer points of racial identification as I am today). Even if they are of mixed type, I can identify the dominant type in the mixture and possibly the other types as well. (For example, golfer Tiger Woods’ dominant type is Congoid, although his ancestry is 50% Thai [Southeast Asian] and less than 50% Congoid, as he has some Amerindian and Caucasian ancestry as well. Yet my knowledge that he is part Amerindian and Caucasian is different than my knowledge that he is predominantly Congoid. I can see his Congoid ancestry with my own eyes, so it is first hand knowledge. I can’t see his Amerindian or Caucasian ancestry, it is not evident to me, so my knowledge of it is second hand, based on what I’ve read or been told.)

Interestingly, all the claims that races are not real and simply don’t exist are based on differences (or lack of differences) in things which are not racially definitive, which have never been used by ordinary people for racial identification, whether things we can’t see (genes, blood types, IQ, etc.) or things we can (height, cephalic index, etc.). Some scientists may have attempted to identify different races through these things, but they are of marginal utility as racial identifiers, and at best secondary to the primary identifiers of physical appearance. They are actually completely unnecessary for racial identification and are only a matter of interest to those scientists who study such things. Their use as racial identifiers probably began in good faith, in the search for measurable and quantifiable means of racial identification, but now they are used by the racial nihilists, racial gnostics and other race deniers to claim that races don’t exist, are not real, because the differences between the different races in these things are either minor or essentially nonexistent, often based on the assertion that the variation in these things between different individuals within a race are greater than the average variation in these things between races. So what! These things are not primary racial identifiers. They are at most secondary racial identifiers. As I said, you could tell me all these things about a person and I wouldn’t be able to identify their race. But I can identify their race by their physical appearance, as I can identify different types of animals or plants by their appearance but not by such things as genes, blood types, etc. Yet the race deniers press on with their insistence that races don’t exist, based on their measurements of these improper racial identifiers, and present this logical fallacy to the public as the scientific view. I’m sorry to say that Luigi Cavalli-Sforza is also guilty of this intellectual dishonesty or incompetence. We don’t need scientists to identify races for us. I was able to do it with great accuracy by age eight without reading any scientific work on the subject, and everyone in my family, and everyone I knew or know, was and is able to do it without help from any scientist. Luigi Cavalli-Sforza and other scientists who proclaim race doesn’t exist are willfully racially blind, and only fools allow the blind to lead them. Unfortunately, racial blindness, whether real or feigned, is a precondition for success, or even survival, in the present culture. It is the price which all must pay to qualify for advancement to positions of influence and power. (Reminiscent of “Gulliver’s Travels,” where blindness was the price required for immortality. Who was Swift satirizing? All the willingly blind conformists who prefer social success to objective truth.)

This is the reason why I often compare our situation to Hans Christian Andersen’s story “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” In the story, the population is told by the expert authorities that the Emperor’s clothes are real, told to believe something contrary to what they can see with their own eyes, to distrust their own judgment and deny the evidence of their own senses. But a child, uncorrupted by political correctness, naturally trusting what he sees with his own eyes, exposes their fraud. Like the child, we must trust what we see with our own eyes, and virtually every person of anywhere near average intelligence who has eyes to see can readily identify a person’s dominant primary racial type by their physical appearance. Even the race deniers can do this, but claim that physical appearance is not the proper racial identifier, insisting against all logic that the proper racial identifiers are those things with which they, and we, are actually unable to identify a person’s race. Thus the race deniers attempt to define race out of existence with word games. But it is a physical reality that people see with their own eyes, however much they have been told to be racially blind and not see it, and to deny they see it.

The ultimate purpose of race denial is to promote racial intermixture, for if race is not real there are no legitimate grounds for racial preservationism — or opposition to intermixture — as there is no race to preserve. Ward Connerly, chairman of the American Civil Rights Institute and a regent of the University of California, is an advocate of interracial marriage. In this he practices what he preaches, or vice versa, as he is Congoid and his wife is Caucasian. Connerly is widely admired by racial nihilist American “conservatives” for his crusade to end “Affirmative Action” racial quota programs, consistent with his belief that all racial values and considerations should be eliminated. The following is from an article by Connerly that appeared in David Horowitz’ FrontPage Magazine in September, 2000, entitled “Loving America:”

When the history books are written about “race” relations in the last half of the 20th century, I expect 1967 to be a big year….1967 marks a turning point in America’s race relations…. In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in Loving v. Virginia that laws forbidding “interracial” marriage were unconstitutional. The significance of this ruling cannot be overstated. Throughout the 20th century, scientists told us that “race” is a human invention, and that it does not represent a natural biological division between humans. Nevertheless, Americans continued to divide people along “racial” lines. Until 1950, we only allowed “whites” to become naturalized American citizens….By mid-century, however, cracks began to appear in our racial lines….Rev. King moved Kennedy, and then Johnson, to pass the Civil Rights laws that we currently observe. But, these merely broke down the artificial barriers between the “races.” A number of states still maintained the fundamental barrier — they forbade “black” and “white” people from marrying.

That is why Loving is so important. After Loving, people began to ignore the government’s racial lines. Individuals whose skin color didn’t match began to date, marry and have children in ever-increasing numbers. The effect was difficult to see at first. There were many who gasped when the University of Georgia’s star running back, Herschel Walker, had a white girlfriend. Today, though, the cable network E! may ask Tiger Woods and Joanne Jagoda, Julia Roberts and Benjamin Bratt and Maury Povich and Connie Chung about their love lives, but not because they are “interracial” couples. Sober observers of race relations today recognize the fundamental sea changes at work. Later this month the Jerome Levy Institute is sponsoring a conference devoted to “multiraciality.”

It is easy to lose sight of the powerful effect the “interracial” community is having on America….In California today, there are more children born to “interracial” couples than are born to two black parents. As the Hispanic and Asian diasporas continue, the “California trend” will become the American trend. By 2070, perhaps sooner, “black,” “brown,” and “white” will be historical concepts. Café-au-lait will be reality….We are on the cusp of the age that forgot “race.” Today’s young children will never understand “race” like their parents. Their playgrounds are “interracial.” The skin of their friends and classmates represent every hue imaginable. We are finally nearing the summit, when the government will stop stuffing the richness of our common humanity into their stifling “race” boxes. The transition from a “race” paradigm to one in which there is no such thing as “race” will not be easy. There is no road map to get us there. Political obstacles will emerge at every step of the way, because of those who hold that “race” is one of those “self-evident truths.” Because certain Americans look roughly alike, they must be members of the same “race,” so the argument will go. We must induce the scientists to step forward and refute the myths of “race.”

Our language must be modified to reflect more appropriate ways of identifying people other than “African-American,” “Asian,” and “Hispanic.” We must argue for the abandonment of terms such as “minority” to reflect the reality that Americans are not part of any socially defined “racial” groups. Thus, there is no “majority” or “minority.” More Americans must be encouraged to acknowledge the “diversity” of their backgrounds. When more “African-Americans” readily and proudly acknowledge the diversity” of their backgrounds — the fact that they are the product of America’s melting pot — then the concept of “race” will disintegrate…

Once social outcasts because of their defiance of social conventions, interracial people can and must now be leaders in preparing our nation for the future. We are truly one people, a merging of those who believe in a colorblind society, who are willing to act on those beliefs in the things that matter most. Now is the time to step forward, to be counted, and to show what a Loving America really is.
The purpose of this race denial, again, is obvious. It seeks to delegitimize racial existence by denying that existence. Something which doesn’t exist has no legal or moral standing to claim a right to exist or any other rights: no right to life, to control of its life, or to the conditions it requires for life; no right to preservation, no right to independence, freedom or self-determination, no right to its own territory and homeland, no right to be. Since it doesn’t really exist there is nothing to preserve or protect, its continued existence is not a matter of legitimate concern, and nothing will be lost by its nonexistence, destruction or extinction. The basis for a Nordish racial preservationist challenge to the multiracialist goal of Nordish racial extinction is cut off at its source, delegitimized as unreal and pathologized as mentally ill (paranoid delusion?), and it will likely be eventually criminalized as a threat to the multiracialist civil order.

Richard McCulloch



Return to Racial Preservation: Issues and Answers page

Go to Racial Compact main page
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #25
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Issue of Racial Intermixture and "Impurity"
The Issue of Racial Intermixture and “Impurity” Correspondence and commentary on claims that the Nordish peoples are racially mixed and “impure”



Subject: South African types
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 03:56:05
From: “A. P.” in South Africa

I would like to ask ….about… the claim by a
geneticist from Cape Town (I don’t remember the name) that genetically the
South African whites are 7% Africans (ie Capoid and Congoid). I think that
it’s mostly propaganda and that the african strain in the white, and
especially Afrikaans, SA folk would be negligible, if one considers the
historical and social conditions of that country.
Regards
A.P.



Subject: Re: South African types
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:16:39 SAST
From: “G.P.” in South Africa

On discussing South African White racial composition, I take interest in the
point mentioned by A.P. about Congoid and Capoid intermixture. Since I am
not a genetic expert, it is difficult for me to argue on genetics. What I
can say, is that a 7% influence is definitely on the extreme side. For
instance, historians claim a 7% French Huguenot ancestry. They had a
profound influence on the cultivation of wine, and other cultural aspects of
the Cape. To claim the same amount of coloured contribution sounds a bit
absurd. I have, for instance, genealogical records of my family
dating back to the 1580′s.
Another point to mention is that there have been made many attempts by South
African genealogists like Cor Pama to map the Afrikaans ancestry. To make
any ‘new’ claims seems to me like apartheid-abolishionist propaganda, of
what there have been no shortage since the 1980′s.

Regards
G.P.



Subject: S.A. types
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:27:41
From: “A. P.” in South Africa

I have a theory about that 7%. I read on an interview to an Afrikaans woman
married to a Zulu man that their light skinned daughter was registered as
white, while their darker skinned son as coloured. Of course, that’s
nonsense, because both are mulattoes, disregarding their skin colours. But,
if in the recent past light mulattoes in SA were classified as whites, then
that 7% is not surprising after all.
Regards.
A.P.



Richard McCulloch’s reply,

Regarding the claim mentioned by “A.P.” that white South Africans are 7% Congoid or Capoid, I include below a rather lengthy edited excerpt from my book Destiny of Angels (1986) that addresses this very subject in the American context. (Funny how the same multiracialist tactics keep popping up in different countries.)

The growing effort to discourage resistance to interracial mixture by asserting that the Nordish race is already thoroughly mixed beyond hope of correction — thereby also disparaging Nordish racial integrity and identity — has a tendency to grow bolder, and more reckless and irresponsible in its claims, as its prior false assertions go unchallenged in the dominant multiracialist intellectual environment.

An example of how far this process has gone — to the point where almost “anything goes” and any exaggeration is accepted, provided it is consistent with the designs and interests of multiracialism — appeared in an article in People Weekly magazine (Dec. 6, 1982, page 156.) about a Louisiana woman whose ancestry was one-sixteenth (6.25 percent) “black,” but who regarded herself as “white” and had been raised in, and accepted by, the white community. Her mother and her mother’s sister, both “octoroons” (one-eighth or 12.5 percent black, having the equivalent of one black great-grandparent), had gone by different paths, the mother “passing” as white while the aunt remained part of the black community. The woman was challenging a Louisiana law (since repealed) which required that any person more than one-thirty-second (3.125 percent) of black ancestry be classified as black in the state’s legal records.

According to the article, Dr. Munro Edmonson, a professor of anthropology at Tulane University appearing as an expert witness on the woman’s behalf, testified that “modern genetic studies show that blacks around the country average 25 percent white genes and whites five percent black genes. By these statistics, said Edmonson, and assuming the one-thirty-second law prevailed, the entire native born population of Louisiana could be considered black!”

The first criticism of Edmonson’s above claim is obvious. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that the “average” white person in the United States had five percent black genes (more on this assumption later) only a few would actually be the exact “average” of five percent or one-twentieth black ancestry. (Hybridization requires many generations after its total completion before achieving a level of stabilized uniformity even remotely approaching homogeneity.) Many would have no black genes at all, while many others would have far more than five percent in order to counterbalance the effect of those who had no black genes and still achieve the five percent average. If half of the white population had no black genes, the other half would have to average ten percent black genes in order to maintain the five percent overall average. Of the half with black genes some, again, would be far less than ten percent black, while others would have to be proportionately more in order to sustain the group’s ten percent average. If three-quarters of the white population had no black genes, the remaining quarter would have to average twenty percent black genes to uphold the overall five percent average, and some would have to be considerably more than this. If nine-tenths of the members of the white population had no black genes, the remaining tenth would have to average fifty percent black genes (that is, be half black, or mulattoes) to keep a five percent overall average, and many would actually have to be more than half black to compensate for those who were less.

At this point we confront the definition of what is “white.” The phenomenon of partial blacks “passing” as white is a complex one. Passing is a form of deception, and whether it will succeed depends on both the racial knowledge and sensitivity of the person being deceived and the detectability of the black traits, which varies greatly even when the degree of intermixture — or percentage of black genes — is the same, as among siblings (see the above example of the Louisiana woman’s mother and aunt). The same partial black may successfully deceive some whites while failing to deceive others whose level of racial knowledge and sensitivity is greater. Under present levels of racial knowledge and sensitivity, an octoroon generally cannot successfully pass as an unmixed or full-blooded white, while a person who is one-sixteenth black generally, but not always, can. However, when they do succeed in passing as white, it is usually as a marginal and indistinct type of white under the broad, less sensitive and discriminating definition of the term. They usually do not pass as a distinctively Northern European type of white. A white who was five percent black in ancestry would, in nearly all cases, know it. For him not to know it would require that he not know his parents or grandparents, and even then he would probably still know or suspect it. That so few whites, including Louisiana whites, have knowledge of any black ancestry indicates how rare and uncommon such ancestry actually is.

The second objection to Edmonson’s assertion is twofold. If 6.25 percent black intermixture is the maximum level that can generally successfully pass as a marginal white, how is it possible for the claimed average degree of intermixture — five percent — to be so close to the maximum permissible degree for passing, when the upper end of the range should far exceed the average in order to counterbalance the lower end and the large number who have no black genes at all? Also, since persons who are one-sixteenth (6.25 percent) of black ancestry tend to bear a physical resemblance to less distinct, borderline or marginal whites, such as the typical inhabitants of Andalusia or Tunisia, why is it that the white population of the United States bears no resemblance to those two peoples? In fact, the Northern European population of America — which in 1980 constituted about 79 percent of the white population — shows no identifiable sign or trace of black intermixture, and remains essentially indistinguishable racially, physically and esthetically — showing no significant difference — from the other members of the same branches of their race who remain in northern Europe, free from any evident black interracial mixture. If the Northern European population of America were five percent, or even one percent, black it would obviously show. It would not look the way it does. The physical-esthetic difference would be definite and undeniable, especially among the more recessive, fragile and distinct traits — whose frequency of occurrence would be greatly reduced and quality of expression and realization distorted and diminished, suffering severe losses in both quantity and quality. If the population of northern Europe from which Nordish-Americans came is accepted as a control group, it must be admitted that there is no significant racial-physical-esthetic variation between the two, and the percentage of fractionally-black hybrids in the Nordish-American population must be so small as to escape attention.

Genetic studies of hybridization are based on variations in blood group frequencies. Like paternity tests they cannot actually prove intermixture, but only establish the possible limits of it, unless the frequency variations are so large that they cannot be accounted for by any other explanation. For example, if a black population has a frequency of fifty percent for a blood group trait and a white population has a frequency of ten percent for the trait, while a second white population has a frequency of twelve percent for the same trait, it may be inferred — depending on certain variables, such as the dominant or recessive nature of the trait — that the second white population has a possible degree of black intermixture as high as five percent. But the natural variation which occurs within populations in the frequency of such traits (due to genetic drift and other reasons other than intermixture), and the margin for error inherent in such studies, are both large enough that any indication of intermixture below ten percent could in fact be zero — too small to provide certain proof or evidence of any degree of intermixture — and we could therefore be discussing something which is virtually nonexistent except in the minds of men. Even in a population as comparatively homogeneous — and with as little variation — as that of Japan, the variation which will unavoidably exist between different groups (such as the populations of different islands) will be sufficient to establish a possibility of some small degree of intermixture with any other population on earth. Only a population which exhibited zero variation — and none such exist or can exist — could prove the impossibility of any degree of intermixture.

Here again there is the problem of definition to consider. A wide spectrum of racial types in the population of the United States — Northern Europeans, Armenids, Mediterranids, Orientalids, Irano-Afgans, and even some groups (such as the Puerto Ricans) who exhibit an obvious degree of black intermixture — are commonly defined and classified as “white.” The degree of variation existing between the diverse racial types in this broadly defined population is so extreme that it defies as absurd any attempt to classify it as a coherent whole in relationship to any other race.

The final answer to Edmonson’s testimony is historical in approach. Scholars and anthropologists in the earlier part of this century, or in the previous century, never suspected or indicated a significant absorption of black genes into the white population. There is no record of racially mixed offspring being raised by, or accepted into, the white community to any measurable extent. Before the middle of this century, interracial marriage between white and black was socially unacceptable (and often illegal) and so rare as to be almost nonexistent in statistical terms. Thus the overwhelming majority of racially mixed children (mulattoes, quadroons and octoroons) were illegitimate and were virtually always raised by — and absorbed into — the black population. Nearly all the black-white intermixture which occurred before this century involved white males and black females (unlike the present situation, where three-fourths of the wives in black-white marriages are white). Then, as now, the children overwhelmingly tended to stay with the natural mother and her family rather than with the father. The practice of racism acted to protect the white race from intermixture and prevent the acceptance of racially mixed children into its ranks.

That nearly all the mixed offspring were absorbed into the black population is indicated by the high proportion (25 percent) of white genes in its genetic composition. Assuming that for most of American history the white population outnumbered the black by a ratio of about ten to one, the above percentage indicates that the black community, over the course of about eight generations, absorbed the equivalent of one-fortieth or 2.5 percent of the white population into itself. For whites to average five percent black genes while blacks average 25 percent white genes — a mixture ratio of five to one, when the population ratio as given above was ten to one — would require that twice as many of the racially mixed offspring were absorbed into the white population as were absorbed into the black population (or that two-thirds, or 67 percent, of the mixed children were absorbed into the white race and one-third into the black). A five percent average of black genes, assuming the ten to one population ratio, would indicate that the white population absorbed the equivalent of one-half or 50 percent of the black population into itself (50 percent divided by ten equals five percent), and that the white race absorbed twice as many black genes as the black race absorbed white genes. But this contradicts the fact, which ordinary observation should qualify as common knowledge, that as a result of the “color bar” created by white racism the racially mixed children were almost invariably raised by and absorbed into the black community, and that the proportion who were absorbed into the white population, rather than the 67 percent required to create a five percent degree of intermixture, was probably much less than one percent.

For the Nordish race, existence in a multiracial society, in close and unnatural proximity to other races, has always resulted in interracial mixture by wayward and irresponsible members who endangered the future integrity and well-being of their kind. In this racially unhealthy environment, fraught with danger to racial survival by the ever-present threat of absorbing dominant alien genes, only the practice of racism protects the integrity, identity and continued existence of the race — and its vulnerable recessive traits — by isolating it from the effects of intermixture. Until recently the practice of racism has preserved the Nordish race, so that it still exists in unaltered form with its identity still intact. The recent trend toward multiracialism is stripping the Nordish race of its defense and protection from intermixture, and its consequent destructive effects of extinction and racial death. (With the resultant intermixture of Northern Europeans with virtually every other race on earth, through both marriage and adoption.) The apologists and proponents of intermixture — who presently enjoy such dominance that the once great academic disciplines created by the white race have been enlisted in the cause of its destruction — employ every opportunity to disparage and cast doubts on the racial integrity, uniqueness and value of the Nordish race, thereby weakening its will to resist by depriving it of belief in itself. The goal of their misleading distortions is to prevent Northern Europeans from learning the truth until it is too late to do anything about it. Their hope is that if the Nordish race falsely believes it has already fallen, then it will fall, when it really falls, without a struggle.

Richard McCulloch



Subject: Disillusionment
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2000
From: Aryan Myth <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]

The Myth of Northern European Racial Purity

White supremacists, white separatists, and white pride groups in general are
quick to acknowledge racial impurity in Southern Europe, Eastern Europe,
and, in some cases, even Central Europe, but they continue to operate, not
accidentally, on the assumption that Northern Europe–namely the British
Isles, from where most white Americans are descended–is 100% Nordic, or, if
not that, then 100% “Aryan” (recent Third World immigrants notwithstanding).

However, centuries ago, the British Isles were settled by Phoenicians, a
Hamito-Semitic people of the Middle East and North Africa, who left their
genetic and phenotypic imprints on the current populations of those lands.

Furthermore, it’s estimated that, as a result of white settlers in America
raping their slaves and prisoners, and of the offspring of such unions often
passing for white, some 10-15% of Americans who think of themselves as
entirely descended from Northern Europe in fact have some black or Indian
blood, which can manifest itself as a dark complexion, kinky hair, a broad
face, wide nose or almond shaped eyes, or, sometimes, it doesn’t manifest
itself at all. For instance, such apparently Nordic people as Heather
Locklear, Chuck Norris, Gary Busey, and Anna Nicole Smith are purported to
have Indian ancestry.

Thus, the native populations of the United Kingdom, and their descendants in
America, like all other European populations, are the products of centuries
of racial and ethnic admixture, and are thus composed of individuals
belonging to the Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean physical types, as well as
every conceivable intermediate.

To illustrate this, here are some celebrities who are descended from either England, Ireland, Scotland or Wales, and who clearly exhibit non-Nordic or non-”Aryan” physical traits which attest to obvious non-European ancestry : VICTORIA ADAMS, JOHNNY CASH, TOM BOSLEY, SEAN CONNERY, ROBERT FORSTER, TERI HATCHER, BOB HOSKINS, PHYLIS LEE ISLEY (Jennifer Jones), TOM JONES, JOE NAMATH, JOHN OATES, STEPHEN PEARCY, STEPHEN REA, MEG TILLY, CATHERINE ZETA-JONES

Got a problem with that?



Subject: Why disillusionment?
Date: Thurs, 23 Feb 2000
From: [email protected]
To: Aryan Myth <[email protected]>

I don’t know of any historical or anthropological source that states that Phoenicians settled in Britain, as you state. There is a possibility that they traded for the tin of Cornwall, but this would not constitute a settlement of the racial significance that you imply. It is likely that a Middle Eastern element arrived during Roman times, but they didn’t have a lasting impact on the population.

While the individuals listed above all show signs of non-Nordic ancestry, none of them show obvious signs of “non-European” ancestry, contrary to your claim, with the possible exception of Bob Hoskins, who is of Jewish rather than British ancestry. Sean Connery and Catherine Zeta-Jones both show strong influence of the Atlanto-Mediterranean type that settled in Britain during Mesolithic times and has been an important element in the population ever since. Neither Joe Namath nor Tom Bosley are of British ancestry — Namath being Hungarian in ancestry and Bosley Jewish. As for those who “are purported to have Indian ancestry,” this information is of little value without the proportion of Indian ancestry. Many Nordish-Americans have some small proportion of Indian ancestry. If it is 1/8 or less it usually has little racial effect, although the psychological effect on racial consciousness and loyalties may be significant. (President Clinton claims to be some small fraction Cherokee Indian, and although this isn’t obvious in his phenotype, which is Nordish, it may have contributed psychologically to his lack of loyalty to the vital interests of the Nordish race.)

Regarding the allegation of extensive intermixture with blacks, Carleton Coon — in The Living Races of Man (1965), page 307 — cites Glass and Li to the effect that the proportion of black genes in the American “white” population is negligible. Nearly all the gene flow between races from the intermixture of the last several centuries has been from the European races into the non-European races, and very little of the reverse has so far occurred (at least as of 1965). But there has been some assimilation of Alpine and Mediterranid genes by the Nordish-American population.

But what is your point? Is it to oppose Nordish (Northern European) racial preservation and continued existence on the grounds that the Northern Europeans are not 100% pure, and anything not 100% pure is not worth saving? If so, this is an old argument that I’ve always considered to be very illogical, in that the people who most strongly oppose and hate racial “purity,” and want to destroy it, are the ones who make such a fetish about it by holding it to such an arbitrary and extreme standard as to define it out of existence. In my essay “Racial Average is Racial Destiny” I propose an objective means of measuring the extent to which Northern Europeans can assimilate other racial elements and still remain Nordish in racial type. Obviously, this means that 100% Nordish ancestry is not required for a people, or an individual, to be Nordish in racial type.

Personally, I love the Northern Europeans just as they are, and want to preserve them that way, just as I want to preserve all the races that now exist essentially as they are. That’s “purity” enough for me.

Richard McCulloch



Richard McCulloch comments,

Perhaps the most relevant genetic study to date on the issue of Nordish or Northern European racial “purity” versus mixture was reported in the May 10, 2001 issue of the periodical Nature. “Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome” (p.199) had findings suggesting “that the long-range LD pattern is general in northern Europeans,” and asked, “What was the nature of the population event that created the long-range LD? The event could be specific to northern Europe, which was substantially depopulated during the Last Glacial Maximum (30,000-15,000 years ago), and subsequently recolonized by a small number of founders.” This report received considerable publicity in the popular press. The National Post Online release dated May 10, 2001 was perhaps the most accurate and included the following relevant passages:

“All humans of northern European ancestry are descended from a tiny group of cave men — perhaps only 10 people, and no more than 50 — researchers have discovered. The result is that hundreds of millions of their descendants now carry vast amounts of identical DNA.The small group formed a bottleneck, squeezing all the genes of northern Europe through a few individuals 30,000 to 50,000 years ago, long after humans left their first home in Africa.”
This study leaves little room for significant mixture from other sources over the last 15,000 years, or even the last 30,000 years. It points instead to a separate “Adam and Eve,” or more precisely a very small group of Adams and Eves, at least 15,000 years ago who were essentially the sole and exclusive ancestors of all modern northern Europeans.

One comes across many reports that some celebrity is part Indian (James Garner, Val Kilmer, Cathy Lee Crosby) but without knowing what part (1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32?) it is not really very meaningful or helpful. Kim Basinger and Farrah Fawcett are both purported to be 1/8 Indian, which again indicates that a proportion of 1/8 or less is not always phenotypically significant.

In fact, I knew a very attractive sandy-haired, blue-eyed girl who was 1/4 Cherokee, but bragged about how people mistook her for Swedish when she traveled in Europe, something I found very believable, although her high cheekbones, of which she was very proud, were too angular to be typical of the Swedish type, and were really the only trait that indicated her Indian ancestry. Her complexion was similar to Kim Basinger (who really is Swedish, at least her non-Indian part). I met her family. Her half-Cherokee mother looked very Indian, while her father was a very big and very blond Borreby type. Her sister apparently got the obvious Indian genes, with blackish brown hair and coppery skin, yet attractive Europeanized facial features.

I came across a PBS Frontline website that purports to reveal the mixed racial ancestry of historical figures and celebrities, with the obvious ulterior motive of normalizing and thus promoting racial intermixture. It asserts that England’s Queen Charlotte, the wife of George III, who was of Portuguese ancestry, was part Congoid. It also implies that Heather Locklear is of part Indian and Congoid ancestry because the name Locklear is associated with certain “tri-racial isolates” — communities of mixed Congoid, Indian and European elements that existed in North Carolina two or more centuries ago. It doesn’t specifically state that she is part Indian or Congoid, and gives no indication what part Indian or Congoid she might be (1/32, 1/64, 1/128?), but she is pictured, and the implication in the text, which almost gloats as it describes her as a paragon of blonde Anglo-Saxon beauty, is unmistakable.

One is reminded of the absurd claims that Beethoven, Hannibal or Cleopatra were Congoid, the latter two apparently for no reason other than that they were born on the continent of Africa (by which reasoning Syrians and Lebanese should be the same race as Chinese, as they were also born on the continent of Asia). Cleopatra, of course, wasn’t even Egyptian, but Macedonian, the last of the Ptolemaic dynasty founded by one of the successors of Alexander the Great, spoke Greek as her native language (although she did know many other languages, including Egyptian, being reportedly the first of her dynasty to learn it), wore Greek clothing, was surrounded by the Greek culture and Greek architecture of her mostly Greek capital, and was no more Congoid than a modern Afrikaner. Yet political correctness prevents timid academics from correcting the racial fallacies about her that repeatedly appear in the popular culture. Even Michael Grant, a don of ancient history who should know better, asserts that she was probably dark because she was of part Syrian ancestry. But her “Syrian ancestry” was an ancestress from the Seleucid dynasty, another Macedonian successor kingdom of Alexander that had its capital in Syria, and who was thus no more Syrian than Cleo was Egyptian. (The Seleucid dynasty was however part Iranian or Persian, as its founder, another of Alexander’s generals, had taken his wife from the old Persian nobility, as did Alexander himself, who took several.)

The ultimate purpose, or ulterior motive, for the above and similar claims of racial intermixture, whatever their validity or relevance, is to normalize and legitimize it, and thus promote such intermixture by making it seem harmless, right and socially acceptable, and the avoidance of intermixture seem less vital, necessary and important, and even as wrong or illegitimate. Such seemingly disparate figures as President Clinton and evangelist Billy Graham have endorsed interracial marriage as a means to lessen racial divisions. James Toback, director of the motion picture Black and White, shares their vision, minus the focus on marriage. As reported in Entertainment Weekly (April 14, 2000; pp.41-44)

…Toback suggests “mass interracial sex” can eliminate racism….[T]alk to Toback, who also wrote [the film], and you realize he’s celebrating the power of hip-hop [black music] and interracial sex to conquer bigotry….”I think it is completely changing the whole social order in a way that makes even passive bigotry totally unacceptable to anyone who isn’t kind of a professed Neanderthal. It’s changed the sexual culture completely, which is the key to race, because as soon as you have interracial sex to a degree where it isn’t even an issue and you start with mass interracial sex, then the races become indistinguishable.”
This is, of course, the very thing that opponents of racial integration in the 1960s predicted would happen as a consequence of integration, and which the proponents of racial integration denied would happen. As its opponents feared, and are now being proven right, racial integration is just a euphemism for racial intermixture. Unfortunately, in the 1960s the proponents of racial intermixture were not as open and honest as its proponents such as James Toback are today. If they were Nordish-Americans would have been better informed about the real consequences of their policies at a time when they would have been much more resistant to them. Several decades of racial nihilist indoctrination were necessary before such openness and honesty could be expressed without fear of provoking strong Nordish-American opposition.

Richard McCulloch



Return to Racial Preservation: Issues and Answers page

Go to Racial Compact main page
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #26
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Ethnic Gap
The Ethnic Gap

A Rejoinder to Torriani & Rienzi
by Richard McCulloch (From The Occidental Quarterly, Summer, 2002; Vol. 2, No.2)

Messrs. Rienzi and Torriani make some specific criticisms of my article “The Ethnic Gap” in the Fall 2001 issue of The Occidental Quarterly and some broad criticisms of my work in general as found on my website (http://www.racialcompact.com). Before addressing the specific criticisms, I think I should address the fundamental issue that underlies their general criticism and disagreement with my work.

I am an American of Northern European ancestry and race. I love my race and I want it to continue to exist. In normal times this would not need to be said. But these are not normal times. After over 5,000 years of existing without any danger to their existence the peoples of Northern Europe, and the populations of Northern European ancestry and race in America and Australia, are being destroyed. I do not want them to be destroyed, so my efforts have been directed toward their preservation.

Racial preservation has to be based on racial reality. It has to face the facts, ask the right questions and provide the right answers, however difficult they may be. What is destroying the Northern European peoples? How can they be saved from destruction? How can they be preserved? What is required for their preservation and what needs to be done to achieve it?

The Northern European peoples are being destroyed by multiracialism, the condition of different races existing together in the same territory and society. Their destruction is an unavoidable consequence of multiracialism. They simply cannot continue to exist in a multiracial society. This is a fact of racial reality, a reality of race, of what a race is.

The traits by which we define and identify race are not just individual traits but the traits of a population. A race is a stabilized breeding population, consisting in each of its generations of different individuals who are the passing components in the continuum of its potentially immortal existence. So long as each generation passes on its genes proportionately to its next generation the gene pool, and thus the race as a whole, does not change, but remains the same in each generation, although the individuals composing its population will vary. So long as the genes remain the same and other genes are not introduced from outside the population to change it — either by changing the proportions of the existing elements or, more drastically, by adding entirely different elements — the race will remain the same and be preserved in its entirety.

The concept of racial environment is critical to the understanding of racial reality. The racial environment consists of the types and proportions of racial elements within a stabilized breeding population. It is presumed that the different racial elements in a given society, sharing the same space, will eventually intermix, forming a single breeding population and gene pool. A race is created and preserved in a certain racial environment, a range of certain racial types in certain proportions, and this is the environment required for its preservation or continued existence. If the racial environment is changed the gene pool is also changed and the race cannot continue to exist in the same form, but will be transformed or shifted in the direction of the new racial environment. A change in the racial environment eventually causes a corresponding change in the racial gene pool, and this in turn causes a corresponding change in the race, a racial shift toward the traits of the new elements.

As my critics note, I use the term “Nordish” to refer to Northern Europeans, which I will begin to do at this point, for stylistic reasons that should be obvious. (I do not, however, use Mr. Rienzi’s term “Nordishist.”)

The Northern European or Nordish racial types evolved and have existed for over 5,000 years in a particular racial environment in which certain proportions of a certain range of racial types have maintained a stable balance or equilibrium. This is the racial environment in which the Nordish racial types evolved, and it is the racial environment that is required for their continued existence or preservation. If the racial environment is changed by the introduction of outside elements the racial proportions within the population will be changed, upsetting and destabilizing the racial balance. The introduction of less distinct Nordish types will cause a decrease in the proportions of the more distinct types and — if the change is great enough — their eventual extinction. The introduction of totally new and incompatible non-Nordish, or even non-European, racial types upsets the balance in the population even more drastically, destroying the racial environment that is required for Nordish racial preservation. This results in the extinction of the more distinct Nordish types first and eventually the general extinction of the entire Nordish population. This is what is now happening to the Nordish peoples of Western Europe, America, Canada and Australia. Their racial environments, which they require for their continued existence, are being destroyed — or have already been destroyed — by the introduction of different racial elements. They have been changed into multiracial environments in which the Nordish racial types cannot continue to exist. The destruction of the Nordish racial environment by multiracialism eventually means the destruction of the Nordish race.

The underlying reason for the general objection of Messrs. Rienzi and Torriani to my work, if we cut to the chase, is that I make a racial distinction between Northern and Southern Europeans. If not for that I suspect they would find little to disagree with in my work, but for that they broaden their criticism to include almost the entirety of my work.

My reason for making this distinction is basic Nordish racial preservationism, as plain and simple as it gets. Racial reality is either-or. You cannot have it both ways. It is one or the other. You can either preserve the Nordish race or mix it with other races, but you cannot have both. Extensive intermixture with Mediterraneans will have consequences that cannot be responsibly evaded or denied. The consequence is a racial shift away from the Nordish types and toward the Mediterranean types. The greater the extent of intermixture the greater will be this shift. The most distinct Nordish phenotypes would be the first lost as a result of this shift, followed by the less distinct types. Eventually, if the extent of intermixture and the resulting racial shift is great enough, only the more generalized Nordish types might survive in any significant numbers. There are no studies detailing the specifics of this process (at least not in humans), and no figures are maintained on the Nordish phenotypes in the population. Thus there are no means to rigorously track, document or study any racial shift, including the shift that has already occurred due to the blending of Northern and Central Europeans, and to a lesser extent Southern Europeans. But any person with a modicum of racial sense and sensibility must be sensible to the fact that it would occur.

My own racial sense and sensibilities inform my belief that a general intermixture of Northern and Southern Europeans would be sufficient to make the more distinct Nordish types effectively extinct, and the less distinct types much less common. As a Nordish racial preservationist I therefore want to prevent a general intermixture of Northern and Southern Europeans, and as a racial realist I know that the only effective way to prevent intermixture is separation. And that is the rub, the heart of the matter, the general point of disagreement between Messrs. Rienzi and Torriani and myself. And it is one that I cannot change consistent with racial reality, and cannot yield on without surrendering the very essence of the Nordish race, and defeating the very purpose of Nordish preservation.

Admittedly, the racial differences between Northern and Southern Europeans seem minor, some would say even trivial, compared to the differences between Europeans and the races of sub-Saharan Africa or East Asia. Certainly they are only a fraction of these differences, and certainly there is even a degree of racial overlap between the native populations of Northern and Southern Europe. But the racial reality is that the differences are great enough, even more than enough, to cause the extinction of the more distinct Nordish types if there is sufficient intermixture between them. The denial of those differences, and their effects, would prove fatal for the distinct Nordish types.

What is the extent of the racial differences between Northern and Southern Europeans? Would anyone have difficulty distinguishing the native population of Stockholm from that of Naples, of Copenhagen from Madrid, of London from Seville? As indicated above, there are varying degrees of racial overlap or similarity in the individual members of the different populations of Europe. Some members of the Austrian and Italian populations — for example — resemble each other, yet the populations as a whole do not overlap, but are clearly distinct. If you took a group of 100 individuals from each European country, with each group being representative — in types and proportions — of their respective populations, the average person would have no difficulty distinguishing between the Italian group and the Austrian group, as each group would have a large proportion of individuals of racial types that are either completely absent or very rare in the other group.

However, if the two groups were mixed together the average person, or even an expert, would be less than 100% accurate in sorting the 200 individuals into their respective population groupings. This is because there is an overlap in the racial composition of the two populations. There is also an overlap between the Italian and British populations, only the differences are greater and the extent of overlap smaller. There is even less overlap between the native Scandinavian and Italian populations, so that a mixed group of representative individuals could probably be sorted with well over 90% accuracy. Each population forms a breeding group in which the proportions of the different types are stabilized in a balance that can continue indefinitely, maintaining the racial continuity of the population, so long as the proportions are not changed by the introduction of elements from outside the stabilized population.

The chart below is my attempt to provide an admittedly rough estimate of the phenotypic composition of the native European populations. The reader may disagree with my estimates, and I assume they are not precisely accurate, but I believe the concept is valid, and I assume the estimates are sufficiently accurate to give a valid illustration of the concept.



Phenotypic group A consists of the most distinct Northern European phenotypes found only in Northern Europe (represented on this chart by Scandinavia, the Netherlands, England, and northern and central Germany).

Phenotypic group B consists of the most common Northern European phenotypes which can still be regarded as distinctly Northern European although they are also found as minority elements in Central Europe (represented by southern Germany, Austria and northern France).

Phenotypic group C consists of generalized phenotypes that are common throughout Northern and Central Europe and are also present as a minor element in Southern Europe (represented by Italy, Spain and southern France).

Phenotypic group D consists of more generalized phenotypes that are found throughout Western Europe but are most common in Central Europe.

Phenotypic group E consists of phenotypes that are common throughout Southern and Central Europe but are absent or very rare in the native populations of Northern Europe.

Phenotypic group F consists of phenotypes that are common in Southern Europe, present in small numbers in Central Europe, but absent from Northern Europe.

Phenotypic group G consists of distinct “Mediterranean” phenotypes that are common in Southern Europe, present as a minority element in North Africa, but absent from the native populations of Northern and Central Europe.

Phenotypic group H consists of more distinct “Mediterranean” phenotypes that are common in both Southern Europe and North Africa.

Phenotypic group I consists of the most distinct “Mediterranean” phenotypes found among the native populations of Southern Europe, but more common in North Africa and the Middle East.

In my partition proposal phenotypes not normally found in the native populations of Northern and Central Europe would be separated from the Nordish population. This racial dividing line would run through the F group of phenotypes in the above chart. Yet even in this proposal the long-term survival of the more distinct Nordish types in the Nordish-American population would be far from certain, and if they did survive they would certainly be much less common. The resulting racial environment would represent a considerable racial shift away from the one in which they existed for the last 5,000 years. There are always racial costs involved in any significant racial shift, and those costs have their greatest effect on the most distinct side of the racial range.

In Northern Europe itself, the racial dividing line should be based on the native populations themselves, and be stricter than the standard applied in the U.S. The immigration of additional generalized C or D phenotypes from Central or Southern Europe into Northern Europe would upset the balance of the racial environment, lowering the proportions of the more distinct Northern European types and, if sufficient, threatening their continued existence. This is true even though the native populations already contain those phenotypes, as a change in the proportions of phenotypes causes a change in the racial environment and gene pool, and thus a racial shift away from the more distinct types. Also, it should be noted that the generalized C and D phenotypes of Central and Southern Europe are not genotypically equivalent to the C and D phenotypes of Northern Europe. The native C and D phenotypes in Northern Europe usually carry recessive A and B genes in their genotypes, whereas this is usually not the case with C and D phenotypes in Central or Southern Europe.

Unfortunately, there are political costs incurred by racial separation, just as there are racial costs incurred by the lack of separation. The groups selected for separation from the Nordish population can generally be expected to oppose the separation. That is why I separated Northern and Central Europeans (NCEs) from other ethno-racial groups in my discussion of the prospects for building a pro-Nordish political movement in “The Ethnic Gap,” as it could not be assumed that the non-NCEs would support the ultimate Nordish interest in separation. And that is why Messrs. Rienzi and Torriani oppose my proposal, and the reason for their general criticism of my work.

Both political and racial costs should be minimized to what is absolutely necessary, but if costs there must be, as a racial preservationist I am much more willing to incur political costs than racial costs, which involve a racial shift away from what I wish to preserve. Racial costs involve our being, what we are, and once incurred the political costs of reversing them (if it is still possible to reverse them) are usually prohibitive, and certainly far greater than the costs of preventing them. Should we sacrifice part of ourselves, lose the most distinct parts of our race, for political reasons? For me there is no political interest so compelling as to justify the extinction of the most distinct Nordish types, and no political cost so great as to compel me to accept racial policies that would have that result.

Is there anything we could offer the groups selected for separation that would significantly lessen their opposition to it? What could be done to accommodate those groups, to lessen their opposition to separation, and possibly even gain some measure of support? Certainly whatever could be done within reason, that does not defeat the purpose of Nordish racial preservation or sacrifice the legitimate interests of the Nordish-American population, that would be worthwhile and not in vain, that addresses legitimate concerns without catering to obstructionism, should be done.

It is my hope that we could be partners rather than adversaries in this enterprise, and that the interests of all could be adequately served and protected. But to the extent that interests do conflict, the primacy of the Nordish peoples in North America should be an established principle. Their interests should have priority and be given precedence. They have a much greater interest in North America, having committed a far greater part of their existence and being to the continent, than any other people. Until a little over a century ago it was clearly their country, and in spite of the ongoing process of their dispossession since that time they still have far more at stake in it than do any others. As a Nordish-American, my ancestors’ vision and realization of a transcontinental nation is still my vision of what Nordish America should be, and what I want a post-partition Nordish America to be.

Turning to some of the specific criticisms, the term “Nordish” simply means “Northern European” when used in the racial sense. The racial term “Northern European” in general usage refers to all the native peoples of Northern Europe, not distinguishing between Nordics, Borrebys and Brünns, but, in Mr. Rienzi’s terms, lumping them all together as I do with the term “Nordish.” That said, I have found that the people who object to the term “Nordish” are those who object to any distinction being made between Northern and Southern Europeans, or to any semantic tool that makes it easier to make that distinction. The same people also tend to object to the use of the racial term “Mediterranean,” in general usage referring to all the native peoples of the Mediterranean region, as it also makes a distinction between Northern and Southern Europeans.

Regarding the contention that modern Nordics are more closely related to Mediterraneans than to their Brünn and Borreby countrymen, general usage — including anthropology and genetics — does distinguish between Northern and Southern Europeans, but does not distinguish between the Nordic, Borreby and Brünn types of Northern Europe. There is a very simple reason for this. Most people, including most scientists, have never heard of the Brünn and Borreby types, are unaware of their existence, and do not know how to distinguish them from each other or from Nordics. Some who are aware of them do not believe they represent different racial types but only normal individual and regional variation within the Northern European population.

Certainly John Baker was aware of them, yet he makes no mention of them in his 1974 work Race (pp. 217-220), referring only to “Nordids” in Scandinavia and northern Germany, although he does clearly differentiate between “Nordids” and “Mediterranids.” And there is good reason for this, for whatever the prehistoric origin and derivation of these types might be, the overriding fact is that for the last 5,000 years they have been part of the same populations, blending together to the extent that few people can distinguish them either by phenotype or genotype. I think almost everyone, including Mr. Rienzi, would be able to distinguish the predominantly Nordic populations of Oslo and Stockholm from the Mediterranean populations of Naples and Madrid very easily, but would have considerable difficulty distinguishing them from the predominantly Borreby populations of Stavanger, Malmö and Copenhagen.

In my opinion Carleton Coon’s classic 1939 work The Races of Europe presents the most accurate and detailed description and classification of the modern races of Europe that I have seen, but I have never thought of it as the last word on European prehistory and racial origins. This area of study is still very open and the subject of considerable debate. In the past few years several genetic studies have contributed some insights. For example, a genetic study reported in the May 10, 2001 issue of Nature, “Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome” (p.199) had findings suggesting “that the long-range LD pattern is general in northern Europeans,” and asked, “What was the nature of the population event that created the long-range LD? The event could be specific to northern Europe, which was substantially depopulated during the Last Glacial Maximum (30,000-15,000 years ago), and subsequently re-colonized by a small number of founders.” This report received considerable publicity in the popular press, often distorted and falsified with a multiracialist bias. The National Post Online release dated May 10, 2001 was perhaps the most accurate and included the following relevant passages:

All humans of northern European ancestry are descended from a tiny group of cave men — perhaps only 10 people, and no more than 50 — researchers have discovered. The result is that hundreds of millions of their descendants now carry vast amounts of identical DNA. The small group formed a bottleneck, squeezing all the genes of northern Europe through a few individuals 30,000 to 50,000 years ago, long after humans left their first home in Africa.”
This genetic study clearly does not differentiate between Nordics and other Northern Europeans, but assumes a common ancestry for all Northern Europeans going back 15,000 years or more. It also indicates a much earlier date of divergence, and more distant relationship, between Northern and Southern Europeans than is often supposed.

The following quotes might help to clarify Coon’s opinion on the relationship between modern Nordics and Mediterraneans. From Coon’s 1951 work, Caravan: the story of the Middle East, (p. 154):

Our area, from Morocco to Afghanistan, is the homeland and cradle of the Mediterranean race. Mediterraneans are found also in Spain, Portugal, most of Italy, Greece and the Mediterranean islands, and in all these places, as in the Middle East, they form the major genetic element in the local populations. In a dark-skinned and finer-boned form they are also found as the major population element in Pakistan and northern India.
(It should be noted that the modern Nordic homelands are not included in this description of the geographic distribution of the Mediterranean race.) From Coon’s 1965 work, The Living Races of Man, (p. 54):

Mediterranean and Nordic populations may be distinguished both in Europe and in West Asia during the span of the Mesolithic. It is a moot point whether the Nordic skeletal type of Neolithic Northern Europe came from the West or the East, or from both.
This indicates that Nordics and Mediterraneans were already distinguishable from each other at least as early as the Mesolithic, and that Nordics were already in Northern Europe at least as early as the Neolithic. And given that, with regard to the racial affinities of the modern Nordics I think that we can join Coon in saying that it is really a moot point where they came from, because they have been Northern Europeans for at least 5,000 years.

One of the most serious problems facing racial preservationism is ignorance of the consequences of multiracialism, and specifically of the effects of racial intermixture. Not only do many people still believe in the fantasy that multiracialism will not result in large-scale racial intermixture, they and many others are unaware of what the results of intermixture would be, and believe in the fantasy that even with large-scale intermixture the different races, including the Nordish race, will still continue to exist without significant change. In this common fantasy, which seems to be the dominant — and politically correct — senseless mindset of the popular culture, racial intermixture would not cause a racial shift and would not result in any racial types being lost or even becoming much less common. This ignorance of the most basic racial reality is so serious that it could prove fatal to the racial preservationist cause, a fatal fantasy that prevents awareness of the racial destruction that is even now taking place in front of our eyes, to which we are all witnesses, by denying its possibility.

I believe that anything that exists in physical reality can be measured and calculated. Real world physical actions have real world physical effects and results that can be accurately described. Acting on this belief, I developed a scale of Nordish racial assimilability to calculate the results of racial intermixture on the Nordish race. (http://www.racialcompact.com/averageisdestiny.html) The scale is much more accurate with population averages than with individuals, and the larger the population the more accurate the average. But after the first generations of interracial crossing have passed, and the blend becomes more stabilized with each generation, with ever less individual variation, the scale would become increasingly accurate in calculating individual results as well. Mr. Rienzi objects to my scale, not on the grounds that my calculations, estimates and predictions are inaccurate, nor that my scale is flawed in design, but on the grounds that the very concept of being able to calculate or predict the genetics of racial intermixture is invalid. In attacking the validity of the concept he basically adopts the obscurantist position that the effects of intermixture are unknowable. This is inconsistent with our long experience with the genetics of animal husbandry and stock breeding, in which the genetic and phenotypic effects of intermixture can be predicted with a very high degree of accuracy. Though there is a normal aversion to admitting it, the same genetic principles that govern the mixture of animals govern the mixture of humans as well, and the results can be calculated with the same degree of accuracy. This too is part of racial reality. The effects of racial intermixture are governed by physical reality, not fantasy.

Messrs. Rienzi and Torriani object to my use of phenotype to define race. Phenotype is the totality of our physical or morphological traits or characteristics. As the definitions of race in most dictionaries show, physical traits are the recognized and customary means of determining, identifying and defining race. As the great anthropologist E.A. Hooton wrote in Up From the Ape, “The classification of organisms has to begin with phenotypes (p. 439).” Phenotype is nature’s method of racial and species identification. It consists of everything we experience with our senses — odor, feel and sound as well as sight. Every living creature, from insects to man, distinguishes and recognizes its own kind based on phenotype, by what they experience with their senses. This is most critical in the selection of mates, and in general nature has been very successful in enabling every species to almost unerringly identify its own kind by phenotype in the selection of mates. It is also the means we all use to identify race.

All of us, in our everyday lives, beginning in childhood, have racially classified or identified many tens of thousands of persons, most of it automatic, unconscious and involuntary, taking no longer than a split fraction of a second, including people we pass in the mall or on the street, in our schools, in social settings, in every event we attend and everywhere we go. For nearly all of us, every single one of those classifications was by phenotype, using an important ability with which we are equipped by nature. How many people have any of us racially identified by genetic sequences? How many by anthropometric measurements? For nearly all of us, the answer to these two questions, regarding the other recognized methods of racial identification other than phenotype, is zero. Mr. Rienzi disparages phenotype as a method of racial identification. How many thousands of people has he racially identified by phenotype? How many by other methods? Has he ever racially identified anyone by methods other than phenotype? If so, he is one of a very few, as only biologists and physical anthropologists with specialized training and equipment are able to identify race with means other than those with which nature equipped us, and those other means are not necessarily more accurate.

Mr. Torriani suggests cultural artifacts as a means of racial identification, but culture is not race and the two should not be confused. A person of any race could adopt the culture and artifacts of any other race, as many millions of Africans and Asians have adopted the culture of the West, but they are still not of that race.

I do not ignore genetics or ancestry as a means of racial classification, but consider them to be supplemental to phenotype, not a replacement for it. I think my critics create a false dichotomy between phenotype and genetics and ancestry. In my opinion, phenotype is normally consistent with genetics and ancestry, being their physical expression, and indicating them with a high degree of accuracy. Phenotype is adequate for racial classification. There is no need for genetic testing that would impose such huge political costs that suggesting them is likely to be a common obstructionist tactic.

And what would genetic testing and ancestry research reveal? Actresses Kim Bassinger and Farrah Fawcett are reported to be 1/8th Amerindian in ancestry. They are distinctly Nordish in phenotype, so the genes that determine their phenotype have been almost totally inherited from their seven Nordish great-grandparents, although some other genes they inherited from their one Amerindian great-grandparent might be the ones measured by genetic testing, classifying them as Amerindian. There are probably other persons who are 1/8th Amerindian in ancestry whose genes for phenotype are predominantly Amerindian (an example of the individual instability of early generation crosses), but the genes that would be tested would be European, classifying them as European. According to the Nei and Roychoudhury study cited by Mr. Rienzi in note 7 the Finns are essentially the same genetic distance from the Mongoloid Japanese (.054%) as are the Italians (.055%). Yet Mr. Torriani agonizes over the implications of a study that finds a “substantial” (?) portion of Finnish Y chromosomes are of Mongoloid origin. What importance should we give to the origin of Y chromosomes, or any other single genetic sequence that might be measured, as a determinant of racial identification if inconsistent with phenotype? I say none, and thus see no need to develop policies to deal with them, so Mr. Torriani can stop agonizing over hidden genes and their implications and focus on what can be seen, as nature intended.

Phenotype is central to race. It is racial identity. A race is more than phenotype, but it is nothing without its phenotype. A race is not a disembodied thing without face or form. Phenotype is its physical body, its face and form. The devaluation or denigration of phenotype is a devaluation and denigration of race. The delegitimization of phenotype as a matter not worthy of concern is a delegitimization of racial preservation as a matter not worthy of concern. The belittlement of phenotype and the denial of its importance are a central part of the logic and argument of anti-preservationists, and a clear indication of opposition to racial preservation.

We live in a world of phenotypes, of tangible physical being. Phenotype is what we directly experience and perceive with our senses. It is what we are attached to. It is what we love. It is what we want to preserve. And its preservation is consistent with, and necessary for, the preservation of everything else associated with our race and every other part of its being. So as a racial preservationist, seeking to preserve the Nordish race, I will continue to work for the preservation of the Nordish phenotypes and advocate the measures required for their preservation.
References

Baker, John R. Race, Oxford University Press, 1974.

Coon, Carleton Caravan, Henry Holt & Co., 1951.

Coon, Carelton The Races of Europe, MacMillan, 1939.

Hooton, Earnest A. Up From The Ape, MacMillan 1931 (Revised 1946).

Return to Racial Preservation: Issues and Answers page

Go to Racial Compact main page
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #27
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Book List and Order Information
Towncourt Enterprises
P.O. Box 9151
Coral Springs, FL 33075
U.S.A.



Towncourt Enterprises publishes and distributes Richard McCulloch’s books, which follow in order of publication:

1. The Ideal and Destiny (hardcover, 1982, 534 pages)

2. Destiny of Angels (hardcover, illustrated, 1986, 314 pages)

3.The Nordish Quest (softcover, 1989, 108 pages)

4. The Racial Compact (softcover, 1994, 135 pages)

All the books may be purchased from Towncourt Enterprises at the above address.

The Ideal and Destiny may be purchased for $20.00. Shipment within the United States is $2.50 for surface mail and $6.00 for air mail. Shipment to Canada is $6.00 for surface mail and $9.00 for air mail. Overseas air mail is $15.00.

Destiny of Angels may be purchased for $20.00. Shipment within the United States is $2.50 for surface mail and $5.00 for air mail. Shipment to Canada is $5.00 for surface mail and $7.50 for air mail. Overseas air mail is $12.00.

The Nordish Quest may be purchased for $5.00. Shipment within the United States is $1.50 for surface mail and $3.00 for air mail. Shipment to Canada is $2.50 for surface mail and $3.00 for air mail. Overseas air mail is $4.50.

The Racial Compact may be purchased for $7.95. Shipment within the United States is $1.50 for surface mail and $2.75 for air mail. Shipment to Canada is $2.50 for surface mail and $3.00 for air mail. Overseas air mail is $4.50.

All orders are shipped by U.S. Postal Service only. No UPS or FedEx.

All orders must be paid in advance by check or money order payable in U.S. funds to Towncourt Enterprises. Florida residents add 6% state sales tax.

Quantity discounts and shipping rates are available for purchases of five or more copies of a single title. Write to Towncourt Enterprises or e-mail [email protected] for details.



Return to Racial Compact main page
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #28
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Leo Frank
2 Replies
Leo Frank – One Hundred Years Of Lies And Cover Up…


This entry was posted in News Stories on December 19, 2012.
MSM ignores rap, blames WP music for violence
5 Replies
Gee, that’s really odd, when you think of a genre of music which inspires and glorifies violence, shootings and hatred, what comes to mind first?

Oh, that’s right, it’s everybody’s olde-tyme family favorite: Rap music.

When last I checked the FBI’s Uniform Crime Rate statistics, blacks and their ghetto sub-culture still have shockingly higher rates of murder, rape, home-invasion, armed robbery, and even mass-shootings than “nazis” do.

But hey, we’re talking about the lame-stream media here, and we can’t really expect them to focus on railing against what is the biggest and most blatant problem first, can we?

Well, wake me up when we see a strongly-worded editorial condemning violence-prone rap music, unless of course that would offend another distribution arm of the same media trust. Certain offensive music is just more “politically correct” than others, I see.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment...track=lat-pick

This entry was posted in News Stories on August 8, 2012.
Join the Save White People Project
6 Replies
Frustrated by the lack of progress in the White movement? So is Joseph Adams of SaveWhitePeople.com, and he issues a challenge to all proud Whites here.

This entry was posted in News Stories on February 5, 2012.
New Files Uploaded
4 Replies
Check out the “What’s New” page on the top left regularly for new additions. We are adding new content and improving the site regularly, so check back often!

This entry was posted in News Stories on December 20, 2011.
Support Solar General
7 Replies
Solar General could use your help, both financially and time-wise. To contribute financially, click on the Donate button on the left to donate via AlertPay. It’s an alternative to Jew-controlled PayPal and after registering there you can donate using your credit card or bank account. We could also use help adding more content to the site. If you can search torrent sites, DC++ hubs, other sites, etc. and get pro-White content not already on SG and upload it, that would be very helpful. You can email comments (at) solargeneral (dot) com with links or to ask for FTP access to upload large amounts of material.

If you can help or have any questions, don’t hesitate to email comments (at) solargeneral (dot) com. We would like to grow as a website and need every little bit of help we can get.

This entry was posted in News Stories on December 20, 2011.
The General is Back!
3 Replies
After hard drive problems on the previous server, we’ve finally got a new server and are coming back better than ever. Some audio is yet to be uploaded, but the rest should be back to normal. Let us know if you have any questions: comments (at) solargeneral [dot] com.

This entry was posted in News Stories on December 8, 2011.
The General is Looking for Talented Webmasters
2 Replies
If you’re dedicated to the cause of serving and protecting the White race and are familiar with WordPress, then consider applying to become the Solar General Webmaster. Click the “Contact Us” phone on the right and tell us what you’ve done for our cause and your technical background (WordPress is the most important, but HTML, CSS and PHP are helpful too.) With our recent switch to WordPress and a number of new features still on the way, we could certainly use some help in continuing to make Solar General the best it can be.

This entry was posted in News Stories on July 4, 2011.
Welcome to Solar General
6 Replies
Welcome to the new Solar General. This website is now using WordPress which gives it a breath of fresh air for both you and us. It will be much easier to add content and keep the site up-to-date and tidy, and more functional as well. There are several other improvements made, such as search-engine optimization of the library and scores of gigabytes of new audio. There’s also a ton of great stuff on the way, so keep checking back. Let us know how we’re doing by clicking the title of this post (Welcome to Solar General) or the Contact Us phone on the right.

This entry was posted in News Stories on June 11, 2010.
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #29
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Mini Manual on Survival
Mini Manual On Survival

By Tom Metzger


*************************************************************

How could I become an active member of W.A.R?

W.A.R is not a membership organization. W.A.R is a voluntary association of individuals and cells. These people co-operate and network for the common good of the WHITE RACE. Their are no dues, uniforms or initiation fees. No regular meetings or compounds to attract agents and infiltrators. No publicized chapters, etc. Much of our work is covert in nature.

TO JOIN OR NOT TO JOIN
Joining a group or recruiting the public or masses is a common error of logic that many make. The enemy fail-safe limits are well in place to control such an approach. We have many such groups around the country who believe their eat meet and retreat logic is a winning formula. I call it intellectual masturbation. It may feel good but nothing changes after the thrill is gone.

There comes a time when the body is so infested with parasites that band-Aids no long have any effect. Be it parasites or cancer its time for major surgery. The general public that you speak of never has sufficient courage to do that. So it’s up to the small percentage of serious surgeons to use a different approach. I call that Revolutionary Racism.

Agreed the general public will not like our approach but on the other hand will not seriously interfere unless they sit on a jury. It is simply a WAR between a minority in power and a minority that is presently without power.

Trying to satisfy the public will drive you mad. The public in general doesn’t have an individual mind. They have what is called the mass mind. They follow the leader or who is successful in gaining power.

No, my friend the time for parlor manners and polite politicking is long over. It is now time to alter or abolish by any means possible.

*************************************************************

NETWORKING

What follows are suggestions to help keep us healthy. Those that ignore our ideas discover the hard way and pay the price.

1) Beware of strangers. Historically, resistance to political criminals has taken the form of small autonomous groups (cells) whose members know and trust one another from long experience. Even better be your own one man or woman unit. There is plenty of written and electronic material to guide you. Holding hands can be deadly.

The head of the DEA recently lamented that once they broke up the major South American drug cartels they were left with hundreds of small groups that were extremely hard to infiltrate and destroy.

After all how many actions have you seen take place that one determined activist could not have accomplished even better than a group? In most cases where three or more take action you can expect at least one to talk if caught. In most cases they all rat on every body else. Three people can keep a secret if two are dead. Always remember in any contact with the men of the Iron Heel always stick to 5 words. I HAVE NOTHING TO SAY. No one can help you but you yourself once you are in the hands of the enemy.

2) Beware of the man who is “too perfect”. He says all the right things, needs little persuasion, plus he supplies a substantial amount of money. Several White separatist membership organizations fall into this attractive trap. They tend to make allowances for people who give larger amounts of money. Sure it takes money to operate but at what cost? Make sure you do not drop your standards or security for money contributions.

3) Beware of handling someone else’s firearms or any weapon. You may find your fingerprints showing up at a crime scene. Anyone that hands you a weapon for your inspection should be politely told “NO THANKS.”

Always carry a small low cost audio tape recorder in your pocket or car. Keep one at your front door also. They only cost $20 bucks but can save your Lilly white butt. I know personally of that fact. Never let any agent of the Government into your house without a warrant.

Turn the tape recorder to record at the approach of any agent from any level of government. If you can afford a used camcorder keep it ready at all times with batteries charged. If you spend much time in your car take the video recorder with you.Turn on your recorders especially at any “ROUTINE TRAFFIC STOP.”

Carry a low cost 35 mm camera with you at all times. Auto advance and collapsing telephoto lens is preferred. All this equipment can be picked up cheap at a swap meets or garage sales. You have a choice, spend a few bucks on equipment or possibly spend years in jail. I have known people in the past that did hard time primarily because they were too cheap to buy a police scanner. Of course most police communication is scrambled now, which changes that picture somewhat.

We are living in a growing knife or edged blade society. Carry a legal length knife and know how to use it. Box cutters come in all sizes and are a good defense item. Plus they are disposable and cheap. More easily explained also. In a pinch their are dozens of weapons lying around in an emergency. Rocks, bottles, or anything lying around the area. In a riot with the JDL a few years ago a comrade used a floor standing ashtray to nearly beat a Jew attacker to death.

A carpenter carries tools of the trade. Hammers are deadly. An auto mechanic carries tools; a pipe wrench can ruin the day of an attacker. Almost anything feasibly can be used as a weapon. Pencils or ballpoint pens used properly will also ruin an attackers day. If you can lift a refrigerator it to could become an offensive weapon. Yes, that’s a little extreme but caught in the street a broken off car antenna’s may become your best friend. You are only limited by your imagination.

Easy off oven cleaner kept near the entrance to your house and out of a child’s reach can be a housewife’s savior if someone tries to break into your house. After a shot of that stuff in the face any intruder will have a lot more to worry about than the rape your wife or girl friend. A can of easy off under your car seat is simply groceries.

Also remember most people go to jail for having guns not using them. I have been active for 30 years and never been in a situation that a gun was mandatory. Pepper Spray and a blade should suffice unless you are stalking big game. It is not a sign of cowardice when confronted with superior numbers to exit the scene to live to fight another day. It is best to avoid simple street confrontation if at all possible. What’s to gain???

Wearing racial symbols all over you is not very wise unless you are eager to enter a no win situation. You may win the street brawl but be charged with a hate crime even if you are the victim.

Do not drink and then go into the streets. Most young people that are doing hard time were drinking alcohol at the time of the alleged crime. What possible connection is there between killing a Negro or Spic vagrant or even a gang banger in the streets and Racial revolution? If you go to prison for stupidity don’t expect to be recognized as an ARYAN P.O.W. Only the finest racist soldiers deserve that label.

4) Be doubly aware of a new acquaintance who proposes unlawful activities. If the person is innocent he or she is stupid if not you will soon find him or her testifying against you in state or federal court.

5) Beware of those who draw checks from the enemy. They are likely to have divided loyalties. Some retired military personnel may fit this picture. I have known personally three retired Generals in my day.

They may have been great at sending privates into harms way but in civilian life they weren’t worth a damn for our cause either for action or for contributions. As far as normal Government checks are concerned, I support liberating as much cash as possible from the Iron Heel. Remember every dime they control came primarily from our race.

6) Avoid drunks, drug users and any one of unstable character. Always choose quality over quantity. Unfortunately this often does not show up until to late. Keep your eyes, ears, and nose active. Do not be embarrassed to be nosey. If the person objects to your investigations simply walk away from he or she. Better safe than sorry.

7) Beware of someone whose intellect, education and background appear radically different from those with whom he attempts to associate. Most people interrelate with others of similar interests and background.

8) Do a lot of investigating. To be sure, the Federal and State cops can create a good cover. But they seldom bother because up to now right wing style membership resistance groups almost never checked their associates backgrounds, police records or military records.

Above all don’t forget to check civil records. Angry divorce proceedings have given us great intelligence information in the past. I once flushed out a police informant by reading his divorce records. The wife was demanding part of his police pay.

Some infiltrators use the military expert ploy. Check their DD214 military record. If they will not produce it walk away. Even then an agent of the Naval Investigative service may assume any rank from lowly Seaman to an Admiral. The same goes for other military security agencies. You cannot be an effective resistance operative in the military and be an open Racist. No. 1- If you declare in any way that you are a Racist you will be booted out of the military. Possibly even be jailed. You then are of little use to the struggle. Military operatives must be totally lone wolf and deep cover. In other words keep your mouth shut no matter what. I have known a few military men who joined the struggle claiming great deeds. In two cases I know of off hand one was supposed to be a Marine Sergeant but was actually kicked out of the military 2 weeks after he joined, plus he was a homosexual. He led several men straight to federal prison using those lies. Another was Patriot party leader Glenn Miller who was a Green Beret. He was a Green Beret but only a supply sergeant not a combat soldier. He later testified against other good movement soldiers in federal court. At one time he led several hundred troops in the streets.

Remember most organizations are sold out from the top, not the bottom. Another reason to be lone wolf or part of a small cell. NEVER TAKE A PERSON AT FACE VALUE. No one is ever above suspicion. Sad but that’s the way it has to be.

9) Recognize the ruthlessness of the oppressor and be prepared to use the same tactics against the Iron Heel. All government’s rule by force or implied force. They will mass murder innocent families, including women and children; they will not play “fair” with you. Forget all you learned in Government class. There is no justice in the courts or in the streets for White Racial Separatists. Do not expect it and do not plead for it.

10) Beware of signing up for any membership organization or you could find yourself taking orders from the Iron Heel itself. Many membership organizations mean well but are at the mercy of federal agents and many other civilian investigators. In many cases such groups are tolerated to continue simply to provide a listening post or a thermometer to gage resistance intentions and strength.

Saying you operate in a totally legal manner means nothing to your oppressors. If you have a successful career the Iron Heel or other groups will ultimately destroy you not for what you do but for what you think. I have seen it happen over and over again. Some groups membership groups have good intentions of recruiting up in class.

If you are pulling down $100k plus and attend these meetings prepare yourself for the bread line at some point in time when the Iron Heel decides its your time.

11) Recognize media’s tactics. Do not worry about labels if you are already a public figure. When they call you a Racist just smile and say thank you “aren’t you”? If you prefer to remain private refer the press to one of several well-spoken people who have lots of experience with the press. DO NOT refer the press to some candy ass mealy mouth double talker.

12) Learn to live within your means. Do not let debt overtake you. Debt makes you a slave as millions of White Americans are finding out the hard way. Most divorces are triggered by money problems and debt. Credit cards properly used can make you money but they are only for the truly clever.

If you cannot figure how to use credit cards to make money get rid of them and pay cash. Debt is a disease that your oppressor’s rely on. In the South after regular slavery was outlawed another form popped up. It was called sharecropping. The land owner would get you so far in debt before the crop came in that when it did you barely had enough to pay the debts. If you ran the Sheriff chased you and dragged you back just like a slave. You say, Oh that’s was just Blacks. Think again it worked the same with poor white sharecroppers.

Learn to live off discards. Buy used. Learn to repair older cars and appliances. Don’t ever try to keep up with the nigger Jones. That’s a JEW trap. Buy your needs at swap meets, garage sale’s, thrift shops and thrifty adds in newspaper columns. Learn to network and barter.

Don’t pick up and move every year thinking the grass is greener on the other side of the hill. Whenever you move some distance from your familiar stomping ground you lose valuable contacts both political and economic. Many of these networks have taken a lifetime to create.

Develop an economic support network with friendly businessmen. Many white people will not join you but they do understand and sympathize. Behind closed doors many are fire-breathing racists too.

These types are very useful in an economic network. In many cases it is not good to recruit this group into active cells. They serve a good purpose without being asked to commit more than they are willing or able to do. In any war most of the personnel are in support companies.

I say you can cut your budget in half from the standard Politically Correct average white families expenditures if you use your Aryan brain. If you find yourself on the run don’t forget dumpster diving for fun and profit. Never compromise a comrade by making contact if you are on the run. Go where least expected. Large urban areas are much better to disappear into than the woods. Most people�s survival skills are not good enough to survive in the wild. Detection is far simpler in the wild using sophisticated equipment. In the wild also you can be killed easily without any witnesses to testify your hands were over your head. The toughest crew that George Lincoln Rockwell ever put together was the Oakland Suicide Squad. This small group lived in the middle of the Black Ghetto and was not bothered by the natives. Would you have the nerve to hassle 6 nazi’s that lived in the middle of the ghetto?

Keep your ear on the news. Most people turn their car radios to rock and role or whatever is the in thing at the moment. If you are a real activist checking the news both locale, national and international should be like breathing. Most large urban areas have all news radio stations. News today is almost instantaneous. You must be aware at all times about the latest news. Yes, I know much of it is pure B.S and Nigger ball scores, but between the lines a sharp listener can be very well informed. Any Aryan soldier that thinks he or she can survive without being keen on world and locale affairs is simply playing games.

We must also create our own means of informing the public to help them be at least neutral in the struggle. Covert literature works best or black propaganda. As long as the literature promotes lack of confidence in the Iron Heel it is good. A large percentage of people have learned to despise the Iron Heel, keep that fire growing. (Learn to fish in friendly waters). We must be committed to winning by any means possible. Don’t let them kid you; the ends do justify the means. People in power sleep with that statement under their pillow.

Endeavor always to send messages, which will ring true in the ears of our dwindling White Worker population. There is an enormous amount of moral and ideological high ground, which has been abandoned by our enemies. Claim it and use it. On the other hand do not waste valuable time trying to convince a relative or friend. Go around such people and find our troops wherever they may be. You must accept that perhaps millions of Whites are not salvageable and will fight to the death to protect non-whites and Jews. Do not cast pearls before swine. We are all part of an extended family now. In many cases this extended family may prove to be a more reliable one than your own blood relatives sad to say.

We must all bear in mind that we are unpaid volunteers from all walks of life. Rich sometimes but rarely, middle class a lot and poor also.

Fanatic is a good term in this case because only fanatical zeal will keep you going much of the time. To be a good leader, you must first be willing to be a servant. Study the book, “The Art Of War” or “MIGHT IS RIGHT.” You must EARN respect – don’t demand it.

*****************************************

Why be Racist?

Why be racist? Well, with most of us it’s entirely a matter of instinct.

We know in our Souls that blue-eyed blondes and green-eyed redheads never got to earth due to God’s benevolence, but only because of thousands of years of pure hate-racism, and that such white folk will not exist a couple of hundred years hence without persistent hate and pervasive segregation.

But there are millions of “white border collies” on the racial issue,

“sensing” that they SHOULDN’T feel racist, but feeling the Truth of things nonetheless. We need to help them by giving little aphoristic “bee-stings” to the mind, and letting them stew on nothing being as simple as it seems. In other words plant the seed and move on. In essence, there are MANY reasons to be racist if one doesn’t like ours:

1) The “social psychological approach” maintains that prejudice socialized early in life feeds racial stereotypes…but how many of you white boys and girls growing up anytime after 1965 really followed whatever your parents said, anyway? I thought you guys and gals had your OWN minds to make up! Hmmm, maybe those racial “stereotypes” are actually “genotypes”…Whaddya think?

2) The “social structural” viewpoint argues that behavior is shaped by Whites’ fear of losing there privileged status. Is it really…fear? Don’t you think you’ve more or less EARNED your place in society?…Quick, will the 2 successful white people in the nation who disagree stand up?

3) Then there is “nonracially inspired ideology,” such as “poor attitudes” about the size and role of government. C’mon folks, is there any particular reason NOT to have profound doubts about the basic effectiveness of “your” government at all levels? Or is it not organized crime and not government at all?

4) White opinions that oppose policies “intended to improve racial conditions for blacks such as affirmative action” may have apparently nonracial foundations, such as the long-established principles of Individualism and fundamental fairness.

5) “Modern racism” tends to shift the blame to blacks and poor personal choices. Uh? SHIFT the blame…from WHERE in the first place, precisely? Rich Jews, maybe?

6) “People do not deserve to be poor, given the wealth of the United States.” Ah, but does everyone simply DESERVE to be as rich as you who have worked your ass off? Hmm?

7) Whites can also be racist BECAUSE they believe in equality of opportunity, and recognize that some dogs jes’ lays there and don’t effa get up.

8) “We need economic equality NOW, so we can achieve social intimacy”…Now, how many of you white guys and gals, once you’ve settled on a likely mate, want the average black to be socially intimate with the two of you?

9) That which is “socially desirable” may be found quite distasteful to the individual or young family struggling on their own.

10) Whites “resist fine policies like affirmative action”…perhaps out of a sense of the violation of American ideals of justice?

11) The American dream — the faith that an individual can attain success and virtue through strenuous effort — is the very soul of the American nation. But it just doesn’t work for the average black or greaser … who, I guess…just doesn’t WORK!

12) We have failed to recognize what “GIVING that dream to ALL requires of our society.” Wrong, it simply requires a total local, state and federal tax bite of 70% of the average white man or woman’s total income! Easy! De deveping countries in de thoid woild needs da money! Cough up honkee!

13) “We possess no other central beliefs that can save the United States from the chaos of persistent racial tension”…like freedom, ACHIEVING your own dignity, or EARNING any respect that others may be willing to grant you?

14) “Our national distress derives from white failure to SEE” that blacks have no real opportunity to accomplish anything with their lives…And is THAT an argument for integration…or resegregation?

15) Non Whites have hopes, fears, frustrations, anxieties and discontents that give impetus to their very challenging existence…and?…uh, so?

16) Blacks will “try” despite “their terrible, ever-worsening, living conditions.” Say, who lives in the ghet-toe an’ trows dat trash a-roun’ de shacks, anyways?

17) Those estranged black poor, who have completely given up on the American dream or any other faith, and threaten the social fabric of the nation “are actually very small in number”…Then, NO ONE will complain when we give them prison work for life, where they can’t hurt ANY of us, white OR black! Right?

18) There is “clear consensus among social scientists” (I always laugh at the oxymoron!) on “the offensive nature of historical U.S. race relations”, and that “the suffering in the nation is because those who don’t agree with the ideology of social progress regardless of cost are cruel, uncaring, unfeeling, just plain stupid, and/or not merely in error, but persist in sin”. O.K., now do you agree with that assessment of YOURSELF, whitey? Finally, there is one with my own imprimatur…”Is division absolutely inevitable?” Well, are there significant numbers of blacks eager to see a black man get away with murder? Answer the question yes, and you will have acknowledged this nation is dead, and that we have simply forgotten…to bury the smell!

*************************************************************

LAWS OF THE LONE WOLF
Anyone is capable of being a Lone Wolf.

Resistance is a lifestyle; each performs to his or her individual abilities. Success and experience will come in time. Always start off small. Many small victories are better than one huge blunder (which may be the end of your career as a Lone Wolf). Every little bit counts in a resistance.

Knowledge is power. Learn from your mistakes as well as the mistakes of others. Never rush into anything; time and planning are keys to success.

Never attempt anything beyond your own abilities, failure could lead to disaster. The less any outsider knows, the safer and more successful you will be.

Keep your mouth shut and your ears open. Never truly admit to anything. Communicate your message to others having the same beliefs as yours. Communication will add to your knowledge base. After all, having an opinion is still legal (I think).

Communication is a good thing, but keep your covert activities a secret. This will protect you as well as others like you. When someone from a membership group taunts you by saying “WHAT HAVE YOU DONE AS A LONE WOLF? Simply say, “That would be telling.” DUHHHHH!!!!

Remember, even the smallest things make a difference. You will see that what you are doing is making an impact. If you never get caught, you are better than any army.

Others will notice your activities, but never try to take any credit for them, your success should be all the recognition you need. Never keep any records of your activities that can connect you to the activity. Keep in mind that repeated activity in one area would lead to increased attention to the area and possibly to you. The more you change your tactics, the more effective you will become. Random chaos is never predictable. Have a “rainy day” fund set aside in a safety deposit box (out of your local area and not in a high activity area), complete with new ID just in the event that something unexpected goes wrong. Only you will know your limitations.

Never utter more than the 5 Words to any agent or representative of ZOG: “I Have Nothing To Say.” There are no exceptions. Anyone who does talk must be shunned from the movement forever.

Former associates of the talker may consider much harsher punishment. Never talk to a Grand Jury even when faced with Contempt of court. No exceptions.

Never join a membership group unless it is to monitor any threat to lone wolf operations: Support some activists and publications with periodic freewill donations covertly. You will be able to live without a membership card- also known as a security blanket. No meetings (that includes rallies, conventions, concerts and rendezvous) that are not for a compelling, specific activist reason that cannot be accomplished through other communication means (mail, E-mail, Net, phone, etc.).

Exist and fight as lone wolves or in a small cell and you will last longer and be at peak performance. I have never said their will never be a time when all small cells and lone wolves may evolve into a highly structure but ruthlessly militant organization with steel hard leaders. That time is not now and will not be for the foreseeable future. No present leader including myself will be leading that phase. We are only to prepare the way. Hopefully what we say and do now will make future victory possible. Remember, those who have come before you are counting on you, those who will come after you are depending on you. Think white, act White, be White! THE BEGINNING

April 2003
 
Old August 24th, 2014 #30
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

McVeigh


Final Verdict:
The false connection between Tim McVeigh and The Turner Diaries


You will be hard pressed to find any reference in any mainstream periodical, journal, or newscast to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the late Timothy McVeigh without a reference to how the entire event was “inspired” by Dr. William Pierce’s book The Turner Diaries. The implication being, of course, that this book was really the only or largest reason that drove Tim McVeigh to mass murder. But is this actually the case? Is the media “on the level” when they claim, or better yet, when they cite “experts” who claim, that a fiction book was the sole motivating factor behind the deadly bombing which took 167 lives on April 19 th, 1995?

To answer in short, no, Tim McVeigh was driven by much more complex motives than the reading of a mere book, he was certainly no White Nationalist, and he had not the slightest interest in a racialist world-view.

For this study, I predominantly rely on the book American Terrorist: Timothy McVeigh & the Oklahoma City Bombing by Lou Michel and Dan Herbeck,1 two journalists who were the only people granted interviews with Tim McVeigh in 1999, totaling more than 75 hours of dialogue in the years preceding McVeigh’s execution. Immediately after getting this book, I opened to the index and looked up the entry for The Turner Diaries, coming up with a grand total of 11 entries. Almost all entries for TD are very brief mentions of the book as he was passing it around to friends or selling it at gun shows, or notice of the eerie coincidences between the book and the bombing itself. However, the listings for Ruby Ridge, Idaho are 20 in number, and the listings for Waco, Texas are at 25. (For the record, the National Alliance2 itself is mentioned once in the index and Dr. Pierce is only mentioned twice.) Even by this cursory glance at the evidence, we must conclude that Waco and Ruby Ridge were much more prominent in the mind of McVeigh than a fiction book.

Regardless, one would think someone allegedly so inspired by Dr. William Pierce’s fiction would endeavor to join up with his organization ASAP. Such was not the case for Tim, strangely enough. The only contact McVeigh had with the NA was a few phone calls to a National Alliance answering machine message line.3 Ironically, McVeigh purchased his copy of The Turner Diaries not from the National Alliance directly, but instead only after an advertisement in Soldier of Fortune magazine piqued his curiosity.4

A common consumer of the mainstream media would also be inclined to believe Tim McVeigh, as purportedly “inspired” as he was by The Turner Diaries, would naturally be a hateful racist, a violent bigot, or a so-called “neo-Nazi.” Au contraire, such is not the case at all. McVeigh’s only real dabble with racial politics was quite accidental: he ended up on the mailing list of the KKK and was initially impressed because of his perception that the Klan maintained a strong patriotic stance and earnestly deplored the evaporation of American freedoms. As part of his exploration of alternative and patriotic politics, McVeigh briefly joined the Klan and received a free “White Power” T-shirt (which he briefly wore once as a political statment and later bartered away) as part of his trial membership, but he soon grew disillusioned with the race-centric views and moved away from it by allowing his membership to expire.5 Fellow inmate Ted Kaczynski even remarked that McVeigh “…spoke of respect for other people’s cultures, and in doing so he sounded like a liberal. He was not a mean or hostile person, and I wasn’t aware of any indication that he was super-patriotic.”6 McVeigh may even have once had an affair with the Filipino mail-order bride wife of his best friend Terry Nichols, which would make him a race traitor in the eyes of many, if not all, White Nationalists.

Thus, Tim McVeigh was no ardent friend of the White race, nor was he solidly committed to any kind of Aryan resistance or similar cause.

If McVeigh was not racialist, then what was his interest in Turner Diaries? By McVeigh’s own admission, he was interested in The Turner Diaries not because of the racial overtones or racist talk in it, but instead because of the gun rights agenda that it raised: namely once the government takes away your guns, they can take away your liberty at a whim, your property and eventually your life if they feel so inclined.7

What did inspire Tim McVeigh to conduct such a vicious act against a civilian target? To answer simply, a corrupt and out-of-control government. A government which illegally killed the wife, child and pet dog of Randy Weaver in a large-scale bureaucratic over-reaction in mid-1992, over a minor technicality of gun laws.8 A government which incinerates 80 people (including about 50 women and children, more children than were killed in the OC bombing) over a minor unpaid gun tax.9 A government which is all too ready to remove, over-rule, legislate away or ignore the rights of its citizens on the slightest pretext. A government that displays not the slightest hesitance or compunction in killing unarmed women and children when it suits its own nefarious ends.10 A government gone mad, accountable to no-one and nothing other than its own petty whims, a government which does anything it wants and lies, denies, falsifies or otherwise fails to account for its own wrongdoing afterwards.

This was the real enemy, according to Tim McVeigh, was the government and its minions. Not jews, blacks, homos, illegals, etc., just a decidedly unfree gun-grabbing government. His love for gun-shows alone11 coupled with his dislike and/or disdain of the KKK indicates he was more drawn to the patriotic cause of the 2nd Amendment than the saving of the White race.

McVeigh– as a gun-rights patriot– saw the issue of gun ownership as the cardinal cornerstone of American freedom, and thus in his mind when the right to keep and bear arms disappears forever, the concentration camps are right around the corner. When the average citizen no longer has the right to possess, own or carry firearms, freedom from government tyranny is all but gone, according to McVeigh. Specifically, it was the massacre at Waco, Texas which pushed him “over the edge,” so to speak, as evidenced here:

McVeigh recalls that he was in the middle of draining the oil, listening to a talk-radio host expounding on the standoff at Waco, when suddenly a voice hollered from the farmhouse. Someone came running outside, screaming, “Tim! Tim! Get in here! It’s on fire!”

At first, McVeigh had no idea what the commotion was about. All he could tell from the voice was that something terrible was happening. He slid out from under his car and raced into the farmhouse. There it was, on the Nicholses’ old color TV– the Branch Davidian complex, Mount Carmel, in a raging fire.

For ten minutes, McVeigh stood stock‑still in the parlor with the Nichols brothers, transfixed by what he was seeing. He stared in silence, his heart racing.

No words would come.

Mount Carmel, the wooden complex where the Branch Davidians worshiped and lived under the rule of David Koresh, was engulfed in flames. Armored vehicles were ramming the walls. In the intense heat, the ropes that tethered the Davidians’ Star of David flag to its pole burned away, and the flag drifted into the fire. McVeigh was struck by the symbolism: the Davidians had fallen. Tim McVeigh, who almost never cried, found that tears were streaming down his cheeks.

When federal agents later raised their own flag over the smoldering ruins, McVeigh’s anger neared the point of exploding. People died in that house, he thought. How crude and ruthless and cold-blooded can these guys be?

Finally, he snapped out of his stunned silence. “What is this?” he wondered aloud. “What has America become?”

He and the Nichols brothers stayed up late into the night discussing one of the bloodiest events in the history of American law enforcement.

James [Nichols, Terry's brother] noticed the flag blowing in the wind and remarked that the feds must have picked a windy day on purpose so the building would catch fire quickly. “It was rigged,” he said. “The government wanted it to burn because the government couldn’t win. The public sentiment was changing.” As they talked, McVeigh’s emotions ranged from frustration and anxiety to searing rage. The blaze at the Waco compound, more than any other single event, was a turning point in his life. He no longer had any reason to go to Waco, but now he was beginning to think that something else would have to be done. Something.12
In short, every time McVeigh turned around, people were being killed left and right over gun law technicalities: first with the tragic deaths of Randy Weaver’s wife, their 14-year-old son and the family dog at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, on August 21, 1992,13 and then the fiery deaths of 80 people (including around 50 women and children) at Waco, Texas, on April 19, 1993. The 1994 Assault Weapons ban14 further added fuel to the fire, but by then his mind was already made up: He was going to act,15 and he didn’t need The Turner Diaries to help him reach this conclusion.

The issue must be raised at some point in this discussion as to the logic and reasonability of accusing books of mass murder, which is in effect the same thing as saying a book “inspired” a bombing.

For example, when then-14-year-old Barry Loukaitis shot up his school in 1996, killing three, the jewsmedia went into its typical slander frenzy, looking for easy excuses and convenient, palpable explanations for what was wrong with this boy. The media focused on his alleged “inspiration” for this act coming from the movie “Natural Born Killers” and most pointedly the book Rage by Steven King [writing under the pseudonym “Richard Bachman”]. A psychologist associated with the trial concluded, amazingly enough, “this novel never walked into a classroom and shot anybody.”16 Can the media liars honestly claim that it was The Turner Diaries that bombed the Murrah building and not Tim McVeigh?

When the Columbine shooters finished their shooting spree, the media blamed it on video games and Marilyn Manson, even though there is no indication either one of them ever listened to or liked Marilyn Manson.17 The fact apparently never dawned on the media nutjobs that these kids were repeatedly bullied by the school’s athletes and wanted to “get even” in one, final homicidal outburst of revenge. This was too “politically incorrect” a reason, you see, so the straw man of non-PC music had to be drawn up to entertain the flock of media consumers.18 Thus, the more central causes and real issues behind these actions had to be obscured, whether we are talking about schoolyard shootings or Tim McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing.

As the old saying goes, “Guns don’t people, people kill people.” The same thing can be said about books. The actual connection between any kind of crime and books (as possibly distinct from other kinds of media) is very weak, at best. A book, as a vehicle for abstract thought, is not the most influential mode of communication to solicit a specific act of violence from an audience. Movies, television, video games and music – particularly rap “music” – are much more effective for achieving that kind of result.19 That aside, no matter what media is used, the Western concept of law (as opposed to a Talmudic concept of law) is that the practitioner of an illegal act is primarily responsible for the act, and mitigating circumstances or influences are secondary to the central issue of personal responsibility, if they enter into the argument at all.

Conclusions:

It seems at the very least odd, at most plain stupid, to presuppose Tim McVeigh was a White Nationalist of any sort or form. As angry as he was at the government, he would have acted in one manner or another, regardless of what book he did or did not read.

It is a fact that Tim McVeigh was somewhat inspired by The Turner Diaries, but this book seems to only be the icing on the cake. To claim McVeigh bombed the Murrah building simply and entirely because he read it in a book is a very disingenuous argument to put forth, bordering on outright idiocy. To accept this argument is to conclude that grown men are routinely driven violently insane simply because they read certain “politically incorrect” books. But hey, it makes handy albeit simplistic copy or filler for newspapers that need a boogeyman to blame it all on, nothing we expect should be too terribly out of the ordinary for media hacks who routinely confuse truth and reality with ideological perception and idealist propaganda.

Ironically, after his arrest and incarceration McVeigh took a strong liking to a book entitled Unintended Consequences, by John Ross. This massive 861-page book tells the story of Henry Bowman “…who becomes a terrorist after witnessing one government atrocity after another against the American gun culture.” McVeigh considered this book to be superior to The Turner Diaries. Although published in 1996, McVeigh confessed that had he read it first instead of The Turner Diaries, he “…would have given serious consideration to a ‘war of attrition’ against the government, mounting a sniper campaign and picking off individual agents and elected officials, rather than blowing up an office building…”20 As mentioned earlier, McVeigh was the proverbial “Man on a Mission,” out to “send a message” to a government which has long since strayed from its original charter and conducted murderous operations against civilians over weak pretexts; McVeigh would have eventually acted no matter what he had or had not read.

In closing, the case has been conclusively proven in favor of throwing out the facetious and concocted fable of The Turner Diaries as the primary and only motivating factor for the bombing deaths of over 160 people. Multiple unanswered questions remain regarding the incident itself, such as the real identity and participation of the two other John Doe’s and the 2nd more powerful explosion that occurred immediately after the truck bomb exploded a little after 9 a.m. on April 19 th, 1995.21 In the end, any further analysis of the situation is moot: Timothy James McVeigh was executed at 7:14 (8:14 a.m. EDT) by lethal injection in a federal prison in Terre Haute, Indiana. He was stoic, confident, self-assured and unrepentant to the very end; although he may not have always conducted himself as a White man should, he at least died a truly Aryan death.

Notes:

1 I also chose this book for the reason that it is perhaps the most fair and unbiased in the portrayal of the life and events of Timothy McVeigh, and it does not usually engage in the gratuitous smear-mongering, distortion and character assassination that other books or sources prefer to do, such as All-American Monster by Brandon M. Stickney.

2 http://www.natall.com or http://www.natvan.com;

Dr. Pierce’s opinion on the entire event can be found here: http://www.natall.com/internet-radio/ts/051201.mp3

3 American Terrorist, p. 205

4 American Terrorist, p. 39

5 American Terrorist, pp. 88-89

6 American Terrorist, p. 400

7 American Terrorist, p. 39

8 American Terrorist, p. 108

9 American Terrorist, pp. 118-120

10 American Terrorist, p. 368

11 American Terrorist, p. 121

12 American Terrorist, pp. 134-5

13 http://www.crimelibrary.com/gangster..._weaver/1.html or

http://www.greatepicbooks.com/review/september98b.html or

Amazon.com: The Federal Siege at Ruby Ridge: In Our Own Words (9780966433401): Randy Weaver, Sara Weaver: Books Amazon.com: The Federal Siege at Ruby Ridge: In Our Own Words (9780966433401): Randy Weaver, Sara Weaver: Books

14 American Terrorist, pp. 159-160;

Info on the facts and reality of the assault weapons ban can be found here: http://awbansunset.com/whatis.html

15

“To McVeigh, history was repeating itself. The federal government had become equated in his mind with the British government of pre-Revolutionary America. McVeigh could take no more. That does it! he thought. Enough is enough.

“He had made a decision. It could be a sniper attack, he thought. It could be a firebombing, a kidnapping, an assassination. Whatever form it took, Timothy McVeigh was going to engage in a major act of violence against the government.”
American Terrorist, p. 161

Notice the lack of a clear plan here, namely “It could be anything,” vs. “I’m going to do a truck bombing just like I read about them doing in The Turner Diaries.”

16 p. vii; King, Stephen; The Bachman Books; 1996; Signet; New York, NY.

17 http:// columbine.free2host.net/music.html (broken link)

On a side note, it was also thrown out by the press that the killers were “neo-Nazis” until the fact came up that Dylan Klebold’s mother was a jew, and neither one of them actively dabbled with racism; this angle was quietly dropped by the media afterwards.

18 Lies, Murder, and Jews http://www.natall.com/internet-radio/ts/050199.mp3

19 Lew, Bill, Tupac, and Mitchell: http://www.natall.com/internet-radio/ts/062798.mp3

20 American Terrorist, p. 304.

Also, c.f.: Unintended Consequences,
Unintended Consequences: John Ross, T. J. Mullin: 9781888118049: Amazon.com: Books Unintended Consequences: John Ross, T. J. Mullin: 9781888118049: Amazon.com: Books

21 The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terrorism is available online in the History section on www.solargeneral.com, specifically http://solargeneral.com/library/okla...id-hoffman.pdf
 
Old August 25th, 2014 #31
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Dynasophy
Dynasophy – An Ideology From Nature

Civilizations rise and fall. From a period of barbarism great societies have entered periods of expansion in geographical area, population, production and knowledge. Then, in all, after an era of peace their vigor and morale weakened and they declined physically until destroyed by external enemies. This pattern has been followed, all or in part, by all the world’s civilizations, including: Sumerian, Egyptian, Mycenaean, Chinese, Indian, Mexican, Andean, Classical and Near Eastern. The question now arises whether Western Civilization is following the same pattern. It is.

The economic symptoms manifested by a society in decline are: concentration of wealth, decreasing middle class, increase in debt, high taxes, decrease in manufacturing, increase in financial speculation and externalization of elites (globalization). Do any of these sound familiar? Social symptoms include giant cities that drain the countryside of people and wealth, militarization, decline of traditional religion, a decrease in population, multi-racialism and even replacement of the old blood that begat the civilization. The future of the Western world is a future of massive cities, cosmopolitanism, concentrated political power, diminished freedom, giant monopolies and crass art. The one bright spot, technological innovation, can be expected to wane as the population caliber of Western nations diminishes along with any sense of nationhood. An incipient sign of decline is the loss of faith in the old religion, and present Western society is beset by moral problems that cause division and dissention, even violence, for which established moral authority has no sensible response. Abortion, gay pride exhibitions, permissiveness and the liberal “isms,” including liberalism itself, are issues that have caused concern to the man and woman holding traditional Western values.

Dynasophy (pronounced with emphasis on the �a�) offers an answer to Western decay. The name literally means �power wisdom,� derived from the ancient Greek dynamikos, the root of words like �dynamite,� and sophos, meaning wise. Dynasophy means awareness of force always required to overcome evil, and that we must inevitably expend energy if we are to live as righteous human beings. This dynamic has gone out of the Western world, so that right and wrong have become relative, and correct behavior is determined by what best suits the individual. The result is a society governed by the moral dictates of what is easiest.

Integral to any society is the race that built it. No matter the material changes that occur in the West, it can survive, but should the white race disappear we can be assured that this civilization will be dead in all but name. As with any decadent civilization, race replacement is occurring in the Western world. There are no longer any white nations that are not considered �multicultural,� or becoming so due to a declining birth rate, third world immigration and interracial relationships. This will be the final death knell, as it was of previous civilizations. Rome perished for want of Romans. Therefore, to preserve a remnant of Western Civilization, and its progress, a logical deduction is that we must preserve a remnant of the white race that has a sense of pride in heritage sufficient to carry Western society into the future. In addition we must justify that preservation by natural law, as well as lay the intellectual foundations for the preservation of all future civilization. These are the challenges of Dynasophy.

Preservation of a white remnant can be accomplished only by physical withdrawal of that remnant from the decaying society around it. Dynasophy is therefore an advocacy for white nationalism, which is not to be confused with white supremacy. Several locations have been earmarked as possible repositories for white withdrawal: the northwestern American states, western Canada and Australia . All have low over-all population densities. Wherever the nation is to be established, a call for migration must be issued to the white populations of the world. Of course, only a small minority will answer this call, but as in any migration, the people who answer will be the most enterprising. From them will be founded a colony practicing co-operative capitalism exemplified by the successful Mondragon Plan.

Civilizations rise in intensely religious periods, such as the Middle Ages, and decline in periods of irreligion, such as our present in the Western world. Coincidence? Not at all. The second Dynasophy challenge of preserving future civilization is a matter of understanding, and for that the following essays are provided. Their reading is essential for anyone interested in the preservation of his/her European heritage:

Rational Ethics: Myth religion will inevitably be discredited in an enlightened era so that ethical teachings must have a rational basis that can answer such fundamental questions as why it is easier to be bad than good. When we attempt to answer such questions we are led to an understanding of nature itself and humanity�s place in it. Here is explained the Dynasophy philosophy, one based on the natural, not the supernatural, using simple analogy and deduction. It makes the connection between our material world and human nature. It is easier to be bad than good for the same reason it is easier to destroy than to create. Just as effort and struggle are required for creation, so are they required to do good. There is no need for a spirit world in this understanding. Thus, Dynasophy provides a new base for moral philosophy other than the mystical doctrines of established religions. It does not teach a new morality. On the contrary, Dynasophy upholds conservative values, even strengthens them, but establishes them on more solid grounds than the mythologies of traditional belief.

Christianity Examined: Here is revealed the pagan origins of this religion of the West, implying why it should finally be discarded. Condemnation of Christianity, however, is not due to it being believed, on the contrary, it is due to traditional Christianity not being believed. Christianity has failed Western Civilization, just as all myth religions have failed civilization in the past. Devout Christians are advised not to proceed beyond this introduction.

The Essence and Decadence of Civilization: Shows the parallels between civilizations of the past and our own, and where the present West is on the civilization cycle. The essay then discusses how civilizations are born, and why they die, revealing the close relationship that all high cultures have with their founding religions.

Nation-State: Knowing the close relationship civilization has with religion, how do we build this knowledge into a new nation? Its government will have to be more than a democratic dispenser of public will, and any nation that does not recognize the need for imperative authority is destined to become trash. Therefore, care must be taken to delineate powers and ensure a balance between personal freedoms and the requirements of a lasting society.

Race: Just as Europe grew from the decay of the Roman Empire so will a new society grow from the decay of the West, only a new nation need not repeat the mistakes of history. This essay argues for white nationalism, which should not be understood as an argument against other races. As usually happens, favor of a particular race is interpreted as opposition to others, an illogical deduction but one commonly made.

Neutralizing Gravity: The ideas of Dynasophy are controversial in a decaying world and withdrawal of a white remnant to a separate region of Earth may not be sufficient to avoid persecution. Future space colonization, particularly of Mars, should not be overlooked. Nothing would make that cheaper than neutralizing gravity. Impossible? Here is a compelling argument based on time dilation and the experiments of Henry Wallace that says it is not. The essential principles for �anti-gravity� are presented for an unpatented device that could make wealthy an experimenter who can provide the requirements.

This website, Dynasophy, is not meant as an academic exercise but as an introduction to a living movement. If you are interested in participating in this movement an application form is provided for you to complete. After joining the Dynasophy League you will be placed in contact with others in your vicinity for association in a local group. The groups meet regularly to discuss the ideas of Dynasophy and for group support in spreading the movement. Each group works autonomously. There are no obligations; our only mission for the foreseeable future is to increase the fellowship of this website. The movement is financed entirely by donations.
 
Old August 25th, 2014 #32
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Drop the List!

A practical guide detailing how and why membership organizations are inappropriate in the new millennium.

“If you accept people of low quality into your ranks, be prepared to have them testify against you.”

There are three pressing reasons why membership organizations can and should convert to associate organizations, how they can do so in a quick, efficient manner and how general, daily functions and a chain of command can be continued uninterrupted. Think of this as a hybrid theory, halfway between leaderless resistance and a membership organization, with the benefits and advantages of both. We shall examine the reasons to get away from the membership approach permanently.

A membership list creates a legal culpability between the leadership and the members; background checks or no, if one member commits a crime, however minor or unpolitical, that holds the entire organization liable for a civil or criminal judgment. And crimes which are not political in nature “become” political via prosecutorial fiat. Without a membership list, associates are merely individuals with a few politically incorrect books on their shelves and no formal connection with any organization that may easily be dredged up in court, plus the drawing of clear connections between a nebulous associate organization and an individual who is not engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity becomes much more difficult. Signing your name on any dotted line is as good as sending all of your personal information to the Feds, along with your political beliefs, because that is where it will end up eventually.

A membership list creates an easy avenue into the organization where governmental spies, federal informants, moles, media hacks, snoops, anti’s, low-quality individuals, and the mentally unstable are allowed a very easy avenue of access to the core structure of power. The lack of the membership list and it’s resultant ranking or elevation by mere status alone (as opposed to organic evolution of responsibility and proof of personal quality by good deeds) means that rejects will still be attracted to the teachings of any such organization, but such defectives will be self-limiting in their effects and otherwise kept away from any core power structure when they finally blow up.

A membership list is the proverbial brass ring which the government loves to get its hands on, it is the sole purpose for moles and infiltrations, and ZOG will go to great lengths to do so, both quasi-legal and blatantly illegal. This is usually easy pickings because most membership orgs are sadly lacking when it comes to common sense internal security and safety practices. Examples: a NA membership coordinator let a traitor he was screwing get access to the entire membership files of 100+ NA members in several states, and the complete information of all these people is now listed publicly on an pro-communist webpage. The FBI went to the garbage dump to collect the old membership list that Dr. William Pierce threw away, but didn’t shred or otherwise destroy; the feds got what they wanted due to a lack of simple precautions on the part of the NA. Bryon Calvert had his house searched by the JTTF (run by an ADL jew) over a “possible trademark infringement;” after the feds carted away his computer and files for analysis to sift through until they got what they were looking for, Calvert was given a stern dressing down for his beliefs… and then let go. How many other SWAT-style raids are executed on such flimsy grounds without a resultant arrest? To answer for you: None, which is precisely why it was quite plainly politically motivated, and thus it is all the more reason not to have your name end up on any list whatsoever.

The feds will dig to the deepest depths and invest unlimited resources to get that membership list. Getting the membership list is not an opinion or option, it is instead merely a matter of time, patience, and cost, which ZOG has in spades. Thanks to the initiatives of cross-linking databases for the purposes of “combating terrorism” and similar Big Brother spying schemes being pushed all over the Western world (think: Total Information Awareness) that list will forever go into every database for the police, ATF, DHS, FBI, CIA, NSA, InterPol, etc. This governmental dossier assembled on you can and will be tied in with your entire credit history, what school you went to, your criminal record, your marital status, your employer, the names of your spouse and children, etc. Your phone will be tapped, and you may even be followed around. Receipts of every purchase you make, every picture ID ever taken of you will go into that database, your IP address and web surfing habits will be recorded when the government goes to your ISP. Every email you send, every instant message you send, every web site you visit will be recorded down to the second.

Is this what you want? How effective at bringing about change will you be when this happens? How effective can you expect to be if the enemy knows your next move before you do? This is how it is now in the new Amerika and if you don’t understand this now, if you don’t get it, you will only comprehend when it is too late. There are no martyrs in this age, and no one will care save a few of your comrades around the world if a few “nazis” get erased from the system.

To the leaders of such membership orgs, I ask you: How secure are your membership files? Are they kept in an encrypted state 100% of the time on your hard drive using military-grade encryption tools and software (like PGP, GPG, DriveCrypt, etc.)? Do you always conduct your e-mail communications with regional membership coordinators securely, using publicly-available e-mail encryption programs, taking into account the fact that Carnivore and Echelon can snoop your e-mail and other electronic communications without your knowledge or consent? Are you using secure, encrypted IM systems for coordinating activities and general political chatting (like SST, Gaim, HushMessenger, Trillian, etc.)? When portions of such lists must be transmitted through cyberspace, do you encrypt those messages with PGP so they can only be read by the recipient alone? Is the hard-copy of the list kept in the safety deposit box of an unconnected non-relative in the next town? What general precautions do you have in place to protect such member lists if your office or residence is raided?

If you have answered “No” to any of the above questions, then you have fundamentally failed in your responsibility and duty to protect the privacy and rights of those who support you and you have jeopardized their livelihoods by your negligence and ignorance. Your failure to act or even consider these possibilities means that those brave souls who believe in your message may end up losing their jobs, houses, cars, families, worldly possessions and everything else they hold dear because of your short-sightedness when (not if) the list eventually makes its way into governmental hands. Remember, the enemies of our people also control the government, and they have effectively convinced most of your unaware countrymen that they have little reason to fret or worry if a few “nazi’s” such as yourself “get what’s coming to them,” one way or another, legally or illegally, civil rights or no. The paperwork you throw around so lightly without a whim or care in the world would really just make their day.

And don’t bother letting the excuse of “We aren’t doing anything illegal; we’re 100% above board” enter into your mind. That may very well be true from your perspective alone, but (a) that line holds no water with our enemies in the jew occupied government, the jewsmedia, or the mainstream anti-culture, and furthermore (b) with 60,000,000 laws, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, and case rulings on the books, chances are if someone follows you around long enough, you’ll break some law unintentionally, and then it’s trial time for you while the entire org is effectively shut down and shut up. Most importantly, (c) you are not the one who determines if your actions are legal or illegal; that is left up to ZOG and the enemies that run it. Do you think they will be fair to you irrespective of your politics and beliefs simply because you have a handful of ephemeral “rights” on your side? Matt Hale, Chester Doles, Christine Greenwood and many others were 100% legal in their activism; how much did a membership list help them prove it?

Quite the contrary, the membership list just made ZOG’s job easier when they finally decided to crack down. That’s why it has to go and go for good.

Why take these chances? The idea of being a card-carrying member is an old-school 1950′s idea whose time has long past, and it needs to go the way of the dinosaur. Why keep drudging it up again, as if that angle of attack hasn’t been tried before? Preaching a revolutionary creed demands a revolutionary approach to implementing it, and an application form is anything but revolutionary. The entire structure and style of a membership org is absolutely unsuitable for proposing or bringing about wholesale, top-to-bottom changes to our government, business and culture in what amounts to a revolutionary fashion. They are too easy to infiltrate; too easy to misdirect once infiltrated; too easy to snoop on, gather dirt, and pick apart once a mole in inside; usually too dependent on the leader to subsist once the government has taken him down; and the members are usually too dependent on the leadership structure to adjust and fend for themselves once the leader is gone.

This does not mean member organizations do not have any function to play in the days to come, nor does it mean we can easily resist the depredations our people suffer without any organization at all; it just means that they are giant sitting ducks for ZOG to take shots at. The possible exception to this rule would be a front organization/company which helps that particular cause through funneling money into movement-related efforts, but even that requires layers of bureaucratic paperwork and LLC’s in order to shield the relationship, plus insurance against judgments, plus a dedicated and competent legal counsel on retainer.

If your current organization cannot afford the above trappings, then do everybody a big favor until the big funding appears: shred your paperwork, wipe your hard drives and start thinking like a real under-cover revolutionary dropped behind enemy lines. You have nothing to lose and a lot more security to gain by making just one slight, painless change to how operations are conducted.

So, now the list is gone once and for all, how will things get done in the fashion of what we shall call Associate Resistance? To answer, let’s talk about what you can still do as an associate org and what you may do additionally once freed from the fetters of bureaucratic paperwork.

An associate organization will still have a chain of command; it will just be based on practicality and personal effectiveness vs. membership status alone. Those associates who perform well and have been proven to get things done effectively will be called upon to do more as is necessary, as opposed to your begging those who got to their elevated position by status of ideology alone, but are ineffective politically, dragging their feet when even moderate action is required. Associate orgs organically demand quality; membership orgs soak up quantity.
You will still be able to collect money from associates; this will be referred to as “gifts,” “donations,” and “tithes” now and you politely request they be sent in regularly. This may realistically reduce the amount of money you collect for operations, but it will grant you a degree of security you did not have beforehand once you set up the apparatus to collect anonymous donations (blank money orders, e-gold transactions, stamps, well-concealed cash, etc.).

You can still have a headquarters, leaders, the appointments of leaders, the delegation of duties and responsibilities, regular board meetings, etc., just like with the membership structure. When done circumspectly, e.g., like at various different hotels, it becomes very difficult to trace effectively.

An associate structure grants additional anonymity to your members on a two-way street. They don’t need to know much about you, you don’t need to know much about them and hence their ability to betray you is minimized provided you don’t open up more than is necessary to spread the word.

An associate org reduces the burden of quality control on your part. You no longer need interview and check out the life and background of every single person that supports you. If someone is unstable mentally or commits some major crime, it does not reflect poorly on you and these are not sitting ducks for ZOG to force into testimony against you.

An associate structure means that more people may support your cause from a distance, people who otherwise would balk at having to fill out 2-page forms and applications just to send you money. There is a natural sense of privacy involved in this arrangement, something that is lacking with membership orgs because they insist on paperwork even for the minor role of supporter; no one considers that maybe some folks don’t feel comfortable filling out what resembles a job application to merely send you cash on a regular basis.

Associate org’s can take and will get more quality over quantity than a mere membership org. The losers who need the psychological benefit of belonging to something will go elsewhere, the spies and moles will have a harder time getting in to do damage and snoop around, and those who want to do good, honest work for their cause will elevate themselves through their honest dedication and performance as opposed to mere status alone. Additionally, this prevents or at least reduces the chances of mental rejects getting into positions of power and then blowing up, taking everything you’ve built and worked for down with you.

An associate structure means that those who would position themselves as your subordinates must consistently prove themselves to be good, reliable people over a period of time. With a membership org, lower-level folks are forced to work with people they don’t know due to status alone, and introductions to that person or examinations of their trustworthiness are of secondary importance, if included at all; In an associate org, people must come to trust each other first before they can effectively work with each other.

In short, nothing major really changes once you move away from a membership-based structure. You gain more benefits and much more security in associate mode than you can ever effectively hope for or enforce with a member org, and you can still get things done just as efficiently.

Rules and general ideas for Associate Resistance:

Rule #1: Buy and use a paper shredder, preferably a cross-cut model. They’re cheap, starting only about $20 and practical to use for all your communications, papers, files and receipts. Don’t keep anything in your records which may even remotely be used against you, and start by disposing with the member/supporter lists. Burn the shreddings if you have to. If in doubt, shred it out.

Rule #2: Learn how to use and make frequent use of encryption software, like PGP, HushMail, SST and others. Attempt to use such software for the majority of your communications. These programs keep private what needs to be kept private. Remember: you have a personal right not to testify against yourself, but your papers, belongings, books, e-mails, and affects have no rights. The most effective movements minimize the personal liability of their members by reducing or eliminating what can be easily snooped on or seized for use as ad hominem attacks.

Rule #3: Keep your eyes peeled for anyone who advocates blatantly or even marginally illegal acts, especially gun-related issues. Be wary of changes in personality in your members. No matter how long they’ve been with you, be on the lookout for someone who suggests that you can “kickstart the revolution” by taking the law into your own hands, since this is just what ZOG wants. Better to not get involved in any kind of conspiracy than end up on the receiving end of a federal indictment.

Rule #4: Avoid meddling with guns. More people are in jail for having firearms than using them; with 26,000 laws on the book rights now, it’s best to avoid firearms for the time being, so don’t do anything stupid to end up with them if you shouldn’t have them. Avoid confrontations where physical force, even in self defense, might be necessary. Use common tools or strategically placed household items for self-defense. Learn enough martial arts to protect yourself against personal attacks.

Rule #5: Don’t hesitate to perform “Quality Control” within the ranks. You will be known as a “meanie” but it will save your ass in the long run. Make frequent use of lie-detectors, bug sweepers, and background checks on your people, both new and veteran. Remember: Quality over quantity, and you maintain quality by regularly weeding your garden.

Rule #6: Keep your head down. An associate org is at its most revolutionary when you have a good spokesman out on the front lines but keep the majority of supporters out of the limelight except for certain support functions. The entire movement lasts much longer in the gathering storm if it’s invisible to the naked eye, and if its members are unknown and cannot be easily traced.

Rule #7: Spread the word. Your job is to take your message and creed to those who may be receptive, so don’t lose sight of this. The grand game is won by having mass believers on your side, not by having a swelling rank of members. The marketing and sale of your reading materials espousing your creed are of primary importance, as it is the lifeblood of your movement and mission. Give this a first priority and you shall never be short of adherents. Pick up a book on marketing and/or sales tactics to help you out.

So the remaining question is: When are you going to start thinking like a revolutionary? Acting like a revolutionary? How many people have to get arrested on trumped up charges for you to get it? No more membership organizations at all, period. Drop out now; its time to start taking this seriously and getting revolutionary.

Remember: We are on the upswing right now, the pendulum is starting to swing back in our favor, and the old illusions of “freedom” and “liberty” are rapidly evaporating before the eyes of the working class Whites, along with their paychecks and standard-of-living, all under the uncaring gaze of a government which has forsaken them for the jew World Order. How quickly and completely we succeed in the future depends entirely on how we play our cards right now. Make the wise choice; your race and bloodlines demand nothing less.

Good luck.

For further information, please consult the following:

Leaderless Resistance. (We’re not quite ready for this yet, but it’s time will come soon. This was how things were done during the American Revolution, after all.)
The Mini-manual on Survival. (Sage advice from “Terrible” Tommy.)
National Anarchist Strategy.
The Strategy of Divide and Conquer.
Memories of Freedom. (Acrobat PDF; About the ELF, but ignore their politics and actions to instead look at how they function and communicate.)
Brought to you by SolarGeneral.com

Last edited by Alex Linder; August 25th, 2014 at 01:11 PM.
 
Old August 25th, 2014 #33
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Default The racial compact...

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t...racial+compact

Thanks for bringing the Racial Compact to our attention. Hope this helps.
__________________
Experience molds perception.

Last edited by Alexander M.; August 25th, 2014 at 05:11 PM.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.
Page generated in 2.19635 seconds.