|
April 22nd, 2020 | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
|
April 22nd, 2020 | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
https://exemplore.com/advanced-ancie...-in-Tiahuanaco Perfectly cut rock. https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/893292.jpg |
|
April 22nd, 2020 | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
I even linked you articles where others including Ex NASA astronauts were admitting and talking about how the U.S Government is lying to you all. Should i relink them again? |
|
April 22nd, 2020 | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
|
Quote:
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." --Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor |
|
April 25th, 2020 | #25 | |||||
RaHoWarrior-SKINHEAD
|
Quote:
I have never once encountered porn there in all the years I've used it and there doesn't appear to even be a way to find porn there. Perhaps you are getting a pop up. I use that hosting site because they don't censor but they do have a 'SFW' version which is censored (for 'hate speech', nudity, advocacy against any individual, group or organisation, etc). I will use this one for any response to you. They do not censor common curse words (e.g., da*n, he**, sh*t, etc.) so its not SF level censorship. And of course no one can guarantee your sensibilities will be 100% insulated. Outside of a direct exchange it would be safest, for obvious reasons, not to expect your feelings to be a consideration on my part. For that, since your influence does not extend further, you must resort to a method that relies on altering your own behaviour (e.g., a simple pop up blocker perhaps). Back to the point Yes it is very, very basic to suggest whatever sounds plausible in your head without even bothering to check the archive to see that it is contradicted by the historic record. Basic. Not knowing what I'm talking about is implied by the fact that I have nothing but questions about this subject. I don't claim to have studied this matter with any great passion. I haven't an iota passion for this matter. I am somewhat concerned that despite your bountiful knowledge you seem altogether unfamiliar with the historical material. But this is probably just an illusion caused by your presence in a vacuum.. I limited the examples to 2, confined to a single mission, both occur in places that can be examined in high resolution from many angles. If you've not been bothered to look into it why insist on offering what turns out to be inapplicable, improvised explanations based simply on not sounding explicitly impossible but which even a precursory examination of the archive will refute? I have no wish to liberate anyone from their belief. Evidence is not the reason that anyone believes the Apollo story and it will not be why anyone stops believing. Little will change either way. There is not much at stake in this. I will try to be brief. Quote:
hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5874.jpg hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5916.jpg hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5900HR.jpg In fact, in one of only a couple of images that show Armstrong, he is standing next to the ladder in the left of the picture. Even in the white suit he can hardly be seen in the shadow of the LM. Aldrin would have appeared very much the same coming down the ladder without the use of the secondary light source. hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5894.jpg Your assertion that the side of the lunar module facing away from the sun is illuminated by light reflected off itself is demonstrably unfounded. Quote:
hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5883.jpg hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5884.jpg hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5940.jpg We can be sure there are no hills or valleys located within the several feet between where the flag was placed and the Lunar Module. Further, if geography and not light were the cause it would be no less likely to see a shadow shorten even when moving toward the light source, if the light source is the sun. But that never happens. Never. Quote:
Quote:
The LM is completely dwarfed by what becomes an immense landscape! The landscape at this scale is perhaps more realistic or would be if it were consistent but it is only occasionally seen in a still images. The most consistent aspect of the Apollo Program are the inconsistencies. Mind you this doesn't scratch the surface, the inconsistencies occur throughout the whole of the Apollo Program. The landscape doesn't just change in scale. The video and audio of the first moon landing are available from NASA or you can even experience it as it happened at https://apolloinrealtime.org but spare the 15 minutes for the actual descent and landing. It is remarkable, nothing like it has ever been seen outside of Apollo. They are in that small craft directly above a rocket with thrust of almost 10,000psi firing without causing the slightest vibration of the LM or sound in the pressurised craft. Has a rocket ever been used for any purpose that quietly. A bottle rocket doesn't operate that quietly! I only wish my laptop could fire up as discretely as that. Of the few things I am a denier of this one I could not careless about. Apart from Apollo I like NASA. Apollo was long before I was born and NASA has done much since then all without any of the issues of Apollo. I can only lose by my own country not accomplishing it. But here we are.
__________________
卐 White ⊕ Power 卐
|
|||||
April 25th, 2020 | #26 |
fluxmaster
|
A simple examination of the photo of Aldrin you posted clearly shows that the sun is at his back. In the other photo where the shadows are of different lengths, you can clearly see a slight elevation in the middle, perhaps not what you'd call a "hill," but enough of an elevation to cause the shadows to be of different lengths. This is all very simple to see; it's not rocket science.
I'm not going to waste any time commenting on the other things, as they are all baseless. There is one aspect in which the Apollo moon landings were a hoax. The hoax is that they were presented as a great American achievement. In fact, going to the moon proved to be too difficult for Americans, so they had to fake it by hiring Germans to do it, and not just any Germans, but Germans who had worked for Adolf Hitler. That was the moon hoax, passing it off as an American achievement, when, in fact, it was a German achievement.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler |
April 26th, 2020 | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
there may be a massive terror attack in america in a week..... " may be " don't say you got it from me since i knew there was going to be an attack in Las Vegas/ Major American South/Western City How would you re-act? |
|
April 26th, 2020 | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: TriState
Posts: 7,208
|
advice?
Quote:
I think if you really wanted to discuss the things in your posts you would start your own thread, no? I for one like reading your posts (even though I don't agree with everything you write ) why don't you follow our guidelines and start a thread or two and see what happens? |
|
April 27th, 2020 | #29 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
|
|
April 28th, 2020 | #30 | |
RaHoWarrior-SKINHEAD
|
Quote:
I know it looks like the sun is at his back, that's my point. We know that when Aldrin descends the LM ladder the sun was not at his back. As this photo titled 'Aldrin descends the LM ladder' from the Apollo archive makes clear. The pic I used didn't show the ground but several in the archive do as well as the video and all show the sun is not at his back. There are no pictures of Aldrin descending the ladder with the sun at his back, none exist. There is no change in the elevation which can account for his shadow doubling in length. If there were a significant depression his shadow could not extend past Aldrin. No matter where they are, whenever they move toward the light their shadows change accordingly. Our Government tried to white wash the connections of the scientists (around 1,600 of them) with the German government because they would not have been allowed in but there was no concealing that they were German. Von Braun was always credited with Apollo's Saturn V rocket and later the earlier V-2. He was very well known, had written a number of books and become a citizen before NASA even existed. The only deception occurred a decade and a half earlier and the moon certainly had nothing to do with it. His role in the space program was not down played. Where was the hoax? You do know what the word 'hoax' means? Von Braun was famous in his time. If it is not widely recognised today it is not because people have been duped, it is merely the general ignorance that pervades the public at large.
__________________
卐 White ⊕ Power 卐
|
|
April 28th, 2020 | #31 | |
fluxmaster
|
Quote:
Regarding the illumination in general, NVDIA did a simulation proving that the photos from the moon are exactly what they should have been.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler |
|
April 29th, 2020 | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,170
|
I didn't intend for this thread to become a big debate about the Moon landings being real or fake. But it always does, doesn't it? Merely a historical observance of Apollo 13.
The most basic proof the Apollo lunar landings were real are the laser reflectors left behind by the astronauts. Known as the Lunar Laser Ranging Retroreflector (LRRR), they are used all the time by scientists on Earth. Now unless every scientist that has ever fired a laser beam at them is a liar and in on the hoax I'd say it's pretty concrete evidence humans walked on the Moon. The other one is if NASA faked the whole thing and got Stanley Kubrick to film them on a soundstage, the Russians, who were following the Apollo missions quite closely and who had their own, unsuccessful manned lunar program underway at the same time in the 1960s, would have been the first ones to cry foul. Apollo 11 LRRR deployed near the Lunar Module Eagle. Apollo 11 landing site photographed by the Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter in 2009 showing the LRRR in the same position as the first photo. I say to joeylowsac and others: Do you think Whites weren't smart enough to figure out how to land men on the Moon, and had to resort to faking the whole thing?
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." --Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor |
May 2nd, 2020 | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: why the FUCK am I still on moderation?
Posts: 245
|
Whether the moon landing happened or not I don't give a shit. Those silver niggers shoulda hit the moon head on and exploded their guts all over the surface. All green niggers, blue niggers, and silver niggers should just fuckin die.
Ha! Ha! roasted silver niggers! |
May 11th, 2020 | #34 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
"I say to joeylowsac and others: Do you think White Americans weren't smart enough to figure out how to land men on the Moon, and had to resort to faking the whole thing? __________________ That answer would be... Jawohl |
|
May 13th, 2020 | #35 | |
RaHoWarrior-SKINHEAD
|
Quote:
__________________
卐 White ⊕ Power 卐
|
|
May 13th, 2020 | #36 | |
fluxmaster
|
Quote:
One can use the same type of arguments to prove, or cast doubt on, any past event. For example, if one wanted to prove that the Pony Express never existed, one could post a myriad of supposed facts that prove that it never existed, which no one would bother to do all the research to refute.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler |
|
May 14th, 2020 | #37 | |
RaHoWarrior-SKINHEAD
|
Quote:
(And I must have missed some part, I don't recall anything about stars.) Complaining that an issue is too complicated or not complicated enough is in no way a refutation. I don't know whether you actually believe the nonsense about the Pony Express being analogous to Apollo (I suspect you are equally knowledgeable about both) but to be clear, there is no argument about nonexistence. Whether or not a specific event took place as reported is not a question of existence. Surely, those highly simplistic and/or highly technical faults pertained to something material. NASA's record exists and is the only physical evidence which can support either belief or doubt. Arguing against the existence of something requires proving a negative. Something that is notoriously not easy to do. An attempt to cast doubt on the Pony Express would be far less persuasive in reality than is is in your imagination. It may not be impossible to prove (or at least reasonably substantiate) a negative but in no scenario is there a myriad of facts, supposed or actual, that proves one. If it doesn't exist you can only point to examples of absence of evidence, which is not evidence of absence.
__________________
卐 White ⊕ Power 卐
|
|
May 14th, 2020 | #38 | |
fluxmaster
|
Quote:
I'm not saying that NASA has never covered up anything, but, if you're not stating that the landings were a hoax, then I don't know what all your reasoning is leading to.
__________________
All these ideas…are chained to the existence of men, to who[m]…they owe their existence. Precisely in this case the preservation of these definite races and men is the precondition for the existence of these ideas. --Adolf Hitler |
|
May 17th, 2020 | #39 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
However, space activities in the country began in the 1960s, with the establishment of a Satellite Launching and Tracking Base in Malindi. It was a collaboration between Kenya and Italy. Over 20 sounding rockets and nine satellites have been launched from the facility over the years. But anyways, NASA has lied about the Apollo program, they have lied about the mars rover ( all of them actually ) and were caught lying on the first one by turning up the Tint coloration on the photos from mars from the 90s, i don't see how anyone can actually believe anything they say. I mean i have proof of NASA deleting 3 days of data on from Sun spots for no reason. There are also other things that NASA goes out of there way at hiding. Hubble telescope pictures of star systems billions of years away from us, have entire planets strangely removed from the picture . Last edited by Sartt; May 17th, 2020 at 09:43 AM. |
|
May 17th, 2020 | #40 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: planet filled with brainwashed fools
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
https://www.independent.ie/world-new...-35400275.html http://www.universityherald.com/arti...fo-spotted.htm The I.S.S Live feed has been cut/ changes frames whenever a " UFO " enters the frame, https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo As much as i hate using thing from this guys channel to make a point, i have to this time, because its obviously apparent that NASA ACTIVELY GOES OUT OF THEIR WAY TO HIDE THINGS. |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|