Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > Uncensored Europe + > Russia
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old June 4th, 2021 #141
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

More criticism of Sputnik V vaccine



3.06.21 - 16:45







The international success of the anti-coronavirus Sputnik V vaccine, that has been recognised by the scientific community, allows no peace for a number of politically motivated media outlets that continue to politicise the promotion of the Russian vaccine. The worse things get with the vaccines in Europe the more fiercely they lash out at Sputnik V.

On May 11, 2021, Het Parool (the Netherlands) carried yet another article with a provocative headline, paraphrasing Shakespeare’s Hamlet, “To go for the Russian vaccine or not to go?” The writer claimed that Russia was pursuing a mercenary line in promoting its vaccine in Europe and beyond.

The string of insinuations that appear in one issue of Het Parool after another are nothing new: choosing the Russian medication is a political choice; if you sympathise with Russia, you are open to Sputnik V; Russia is conducting a hybrid war through Russia Today and Sputnik news agencies, and is smearing its competitors’ products to undermining trust in Western vaccines, European institutions and Western European vaccination strategies. As usual, there are no specific references to these allegedly denigrating actions.

Instead, the authors quote anti-Russia clichés from Lithuanian authorities and a statement by President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, who claimed that vaccination rates in Russia were lagging considerably behind European rates. The fact that vaccination centres are open throughout Russia and that mobile Russian medical teams are currently vaccinating people in remote areas, is quietly ignored.

The Dutch journalists explain the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) lack of approval for the Russian vaccine by saying Russia has failed to present additional information and proof of the vaccine’s effectiveness. This is perplexing because The Lancet, a prestigious international medical journal, has published scientific articles on the results of three phases of the vaccine’s clinical trials. Meanwhile, Russia submitted all of the requested information to the EMA in March. In other words, it is delaying the approval of the Russian vaccine based on some vague pretense. We believe this is being done for political reasons. We would like to know if the pharmaceutical giants that received EMA approval submitted this additional information or if it was only required for Sputnik V.

In addition, accusing Russia of politicising its vaccine, the journalists ignore a number of proposals by Russian leaders either for lack of knowledge or deliberately. These proposals suggest forgetting about politics when human health is at stake. Thus, President of Russia Vladimir Putin supported the idea of suspending patent protection for COVID-19 vaccines. It would be good if the authors of the article mentioned this.

In any case, the authors cannot deny the success of the Russian vaccine. They reluctantly admit that over 60 countries have approved it and 28 states are using it in their vaccination programmes. Maybe, it is time for the Het Parool journalists to seriously ponder what was said by former Slovakian Prime Minister Igor Matovic who was strongly criticised for his decision to order the Russian vaccine: “Health and life are the only rules in a pandemic.” Common sense suggests a confident “yes” to the question in the Shakespearean headline.



http://www.parool.nl/wereld/vacciner....google.com%2F




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/ru/nedostovernie-...nguageId=en_GB
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old October 16th, 2021 #142
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Anti-Russia publication in Italian La Repubblica Open letter by Russian Ambassador to Italy Sergey Razov to Editor-in-Chief of La Repubblica



28 June 2021 - 16:06







Esteemed Mr Editor-in-Chief,

We noted a lengthy article entitled “Bergamo: virus, spie e vaccini” that was published in your newspaper on June 20. In this article, your newspaper again recalls the events of March-April 2020, when a group of Russian virologists and disinfection specialists worked in northern Italy.

Three and a half lines of this article admit that “the Russian soldiers in Bergamo provided practical assistance by curing dozens of patients during the gloomiest hours in modern history, and by disinfecting dozens of care homes for the elderly.” The remaining almost 500 lines are a compilation of fabrications about the ostensibly real nature of an alleged Russian military spying mission in the spirit of “hybrid wars,” and “disinformation and propaganda campaigns,” including even “elements of competition aimed at reshaping the geopolitical map of the world.” Trying to analyse this entire package of allegations is a waste of time. Let’s just mention a few facts.

I remember well how a year ago, this newspaper and a number of other Italian media outlets tried to accuse our mission of spying. They alleged that the mission was trying to gather information about the military facilities of Italy and NATO in Bergamo and Brescia, where our specialists were working. Our explanations that the Italian authorities had chosen these areas themselves were simply ignored. It took more than a year for the authors of La Repubblica to finally admit the obvious – it transpired that, after all, our humanitarian mission was not seeking information about the Italian and NATO military facilities (apparently, there is no tradition to apologise for the overt disinformation that was actively spread in the spring of 2020).

However, as they say: “That which is crooked cannot be made straight” (Ecclesiastes 1:15). Now the authors of Repubblica are accusing us of sending our best virologists and epidemiologists, with extensive experience to Italy (yes, we took pride in saying this from the very start). They write that our experts had a modern mobile laboratory that analysed “the genetic structure of the virus and sent encrypted information to Moscow.” Indeed, at that time we also mentioned this mobile laboratory that was exclusively monitoring the population’s health, specifying the methods and doses of immune protection, analysing PCR and dealing with gene type assignment. (Incidentally, there were indeed coronavirus cases among our military who worked in the most dangerous sites in Italy). How can the authors of this article talk about secret tasks and capabilities of this laboratory if they themselves admit that no outsiders had access to it?

Furthermore, they make what is probably the most absurd and sacrilegious statement: “the Sputnik V vaccine was born of the Italian virus.” (Have the Russians stolen the Italian COVID?!) The authors are trying to track a direct cause-and-effect and time link between the work of our mission and the invention of the Russian vaccine. The message is that the clinical data obtained in Italy by “spying” allowed our specialists to make the vaccine very quickly. However, this is contrary to the facts. The newspaper admits that sanitary and military sources in Italy confirm, “the Russians were not allowed to take any samples from the hospitals where they were treating patients.” Moreover, in June, Russia started testing the Sputnik V vaccine on volunteers and in August it was the first to be certified in the world. Even a non professional understands that the development of this vaccine could only have been produced through study of other viral diseases over many years.

It is perfectly obvious that the heroic work of our military in Italy, over 46 days, gave them some experience in understanding the dangers of this disease and the speed and characteristics of its spread. The infection came to Russia three to four weeks later than it did to Italy. And this experience was duly used while developing our own methods of fighting the pandemic. But why is this a crime?! This is an absolutely natural and universally accepted course of cooperation that continues up to this day. Incidentally, at present the Rome-based Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute for Infectious Diseases is conducting important clinical tests of the Sputnik V vaccine with the participation of Russian specialists. Other studies are planned under the relevant memorandum on cooperation signed last April. We believe that if Repubblica had devoted one hundredth part of its extensive article to this cooperation in countering the epidemic, it would have been more useful and informative for the readers of the prestigious newspaper.

Finally, the last point. The authors call Bergamo “a venue for testing new hybrid conflicts.” We think of it as a place where the Russian leaders and the Russian people selflessly helped Italian people who were in trouble. This is our main point of divergence with the editors of the newspaper, the policy of which compels us to respond to such articles.

Ambassador of Russia to Italy

21.06.2021




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ynamic=novelty
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old October 16th, 2021 #143
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Yet another attempt to falsify World War II history



2 July 2021 - 17:50







On the 80th anniversary of the beginning of the Great Patriotic War and the entry of the US into WWII, there are still those in the West who believe, rather that recalling the glorious brotherhood-in-arms of Soviet and US soldiers, that we were allegedly craving for war. We will not dwell on the morals of those individuals and will leave it on their conscience (in unlikely case they have one), we will just note that these pseudo historians have conducted “deep analysis” of the events of 1941 and have arrived at some perverse logic.

Recently Sean McMeekin who has a long record of twisting historical facts, declared in the Wall Street Journal that the USSR allegedly benefited from the launch of hostilities in the Pacific theatre of war and that this is confirmed by the neutrality pact signed by Moscow and Tokyo in April 1941.

It is probably high time to wipe off the dust of history from archive stacks and remind everyone how things really stood.

The 1930s. The world is facing a big war, which would change the face of the earth forever. Here and there armed conflicts flare up and people are dying. Spain, Finland, China are just the best-known hotbeds of confrontation that will lead to the hellfire of the World War II. The Soviet Union – a young and peaceful state – urges the entire world to be responsible. It proposes to set up a collective security system in Europe, but Moscow is not heeded: Daladier and Chamberlain proudly shake the papers they signed with Hitler and rejoice at his “Munich appeasement.”

Meanwhile, in the Far East, Japanese troops are advancing into the heartland of China and conquer new territories. The Japanese do not conceal that they are ready to annex Manchuria and later Mongolia. Moscow is appealing to the world but its capitals and the League of Nations (the USSR joined it in 1934) seem to be deaf. Moreover, they are trying to befriend Tokyo – the Americans, following the hardest years of the Great Depression, provided the Japanese Empire with military aid worth $181 million in 1931 through 1932 while France and Britain kept supplying it with strategic military materials.

The Soviet Union understood the futility of addressing London, Paris and Washington, and concluded a mutual assistance agreement with Mongolia. Immediately afterwards, Japan ratcheted up its militaristic rhetoric and signed the Anti-Commintern Pact with Germany, which has a secret appendix targeting the USSR. Even before WWII began, there emerged a real threat of a big war in the Far East between the USSR and Japan. The Japanese, even though they knew about the agreement between Moscow and Ulan-Bator, set out to launch hostilities.

From July 29 to August 11, 1938, tens of thousands troops, air force, artillery and cavalry were engaged in incidents near Lake Khasan. The following summer the Japanese decided again to advance north and in 1939 crossed the Khalkhin-Gol and occupied Bayan-Tsagan Mount. Nothing kept the militaristic troops from moving further north and occupying the Trans-Baikal territories in Siberia. To prevent this, the 1st Army Group was established under Corps Commander Georgy Zhukov. By making tremendous efforts and stopping Japan’s advance into Mongolia, the Soviet Union ensured security for itself and slowed down Tokyo’s aggression on the continent. Some researchers believe that this gave the USA some time to prepare for the coming war, which the Japanese militarists could begin earlier, in 1940.

Meanwhile, what were the Western powers doing? Instead of showing solidarity with the Soviet Union, which was actually fighting an aggressor, they acted the same way as in Munich. During the fighting on Khalkhin-Gol, British Ambassador Robert Craigei concluded an agreement with Japanese Foreign Minister Hachiro Arita on July 1939 (called the Craigie-Artita Agreement), which de-facto supported the Japanese actions in continental China. It is telling that western Wikipedia versions have practically no information about this document. The English-language version has a reference to the Tientsin incident (escalation in trade relations between London and Tokyo) but there are no articles on the appeasement of the Japanese militarists’ regime. Check for yourselves.

By paying for the inviolability of its borders with the blood of Soviet soldiers, Moscow forced Tokyo to conclude a neutrality pact. However, Moscow never had illusions regarding the Japanese Empire’s aspirations during the war. Even at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War Joseph Stalin wrote in a letter to Winston Churchill, “If Japan violates the treaty [on neutrality] and attacks the Soviet Union, it will encounter a fitting rebuff from Soviet troops.” Even during the first stages of the Battle of Moscow, the Far Eastern Front troops were deployed in southern Siberia (though so badly needed in the Smolensk and Moscow regions) so as to prevent a sudden invasion. The following is a sample of what Joachim von Ribbentrop wrote to the Reich’s ambassador to Tokyo in the summer of 1941: “I ask you to use all available resources to insist on Japan’s joining the war with Russia in the shortest possible time... The sooner it joins the war, the better. It is our natural wish to meet the Japanese representatives on the Trans-Siberian railway as early as before the winter.”

As to the start of the hostilities in the Pacific, it was largely due to significant miscalculations by the US, in particular, its curbing of diplomatic talks with the Japanese, its condoning Germany’s expansionist policy alongside its hope that Japan would join Germany in its aggression against the USSR, as well as its apparent underestimation of Tokyo’s military capabilities.

Contrary to what the West is trying to present, a war in the Far East was not beneficial to the Soviet Union. We have always called for peaceful co-existence of powers in all of the world’s regions. And if someone wants to twist logic and present everything in a perverted way, it’s not going to work. Because we know history.



https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-oth...41-11618265667



One can learn about the circumstances around the start of WWII from the fundamental work “The Sheet Music of WWII: Who Began the War and When?” by Valentin Falin and Natalya Narochnitskaya.




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ent/id/4806970
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old October 16th, 2021 #144
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Another fake about Russian hackers



9 July 2021 - 17:45







The omnipresent hackers supposedly connected with the Russian security services keep heating up the imagination of Western journalists, who present their concoctions dressed up as some sort of an investigation.

This time, the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant decided to expose “hackers who penetrated deep inside the law enforcement system of the Netherlands.” On June 8, it carried an article by Huib Modderkolk citing anonymous sources (which is always done for want of evidence) who said that in 2017 the servers of the National Police in the Netherlands were attacked by hackers connected with (can you guess who? But of course!) the Russian security services. The perpetrators allegedly found a backdoor in the computer system of the Police Academy (however comical it sounds) and got access to the entire police database.

The journalist did not bother to prove Moscow’s involvement in the incident. What’s the use of evidence when the true goal is to use the word “Russia” in a negative context once again, and to cement a negative attitude towards our country among the Dutch public.

Generally speaking, the Western media regularly plant such fake stories on a variety of topics. Recently the theme of “Russian hackers” and “Chinese “IT-specialists” emerged so as to cover up the scandals related to collecting data on the country’s citizens by both the Defence Ministry, which is not legally authorised to do so, and municipal officials who used fake Facebook accounts. Apparently, this is done for the public to feel a threat emanating from somewhere outside rather than from the EU defence and security agencies and NATO.

Meanwhile, our constructive proposals on cooperation in cybersecurity are being ignored, obviously for political reasons. The Russian leader repeatedly stressed our country’s readiness to hold consultations on these issues; the last time he made this proposal during his talks with US President Joe Biden in Geneva on June 16. The EU capitals also know how to contact the National Computer Incident Response and Coordination Centre (NCIRCC), an authorised body that ensures Russia’s interaction with other countries’ agencies, international NGOs and foreign organisations involved in computer incident response. However, to all appearances, this is another case when the NCIRCC was not addressed. It is much easier to groundlessly accuse Russia and carry on the anti-Russia narrative than to really interact with our country. This was proved once again by the De Volkskrant article about the mythical Russian hackers.



https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-ach...itie~b0e044e1/




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ent/id/4811409
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old October 16th, 2021 #145
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Anti-Russia publication on Russian aid to the CAR in US media



14 July 2021 - 19:41







Some Western media cannot accept еhe progressing normalisation in the Central African Republic (CAR) which was affected by clashes between its regular troops and armed gangs. They are most indignant that credit for reaching peace largely goes to the Russian instructors who were invited by the lawful CAR authorities to help national armed forces and law-enforcement bodies upgrade their combat capability. The quicker the settlement process proceeds, the more monstrous anti-Russia fabrications are produced by disreputable American journalists.

CNN fired yet another propagandist salvo on June 15 by broadcasting inaccurate information about the crimes that our specialists have supposedly committed against CAR civilians. Once again, it used sensationalised “facts” about Russian “mercenaries from PMC Wagner” that “robbed people and killed children” and committed other unthinkable offenses against the local people. To enhance the dramatic effect, these journalists published photos of a mosque with walls peppered with bullets and a corpse of a civilian wrapped in dead-clothes. They also quoted testimonies by eyewitnesses who saw how civilians were shot from helicopters, detonated by anti-personnel mines or massacred for collaborating with anti-government forces.

The character of the planned anti-Russia campaign is betrayed by the material published almost simultaneously with the CNN story. This is the June 16 joint statement by Head of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, Democrat Gregory Meeks and Lead Republican Michael McCaul with accusations against “the Kremlin-controlled Wagner group.” An address to the Joseph Biden administration demands an inquiry into the supposed role of the PMC in summary execution, rape and the cruel treatment of civilians.

No conclusive evidence of Russian involvement in the above crimes was presented. As always, viewers are asked to believe the TV channel and the congressmen “per word.” This demarche is yet another attempt by certain circles in Washington to expand the systematic challenge to our country by establishing new regional fronts for confronting Russia, now in Africa.

In this context, the Western media and government institutions have become markedly more active in smearing Russian aid in African countries, primarily in the CAR. One of the aims of these efforts is to justify the attempts of the US and its allies to interfere in the internal affairs in various countries to overthrow “objectionable regimes.” The excuse is usually the same: “to protect the civilian population.” Similar scenarios have been tested in Somalia, Iraq, Libya and Syria, all of whom are still recovering from American “humanitarian interventions.” At the same time, the American media obviously lack the courage to conduct a serious journalistic inquiry into the activities of US “secret armies” that commit heinous crimes against civilians in foreign territories from Pakistan to West Africa, or special operations in North Korea and Iran. Incidentally, as distinct from US secret armies that rely on local gangs, Russian aid is always distributed on lawful grounds in the interests of establishing peace and order. A group of Russian instructors was sent to the CAR at the request of its leaders and with the knowledge of the UN Security Council Sanctions Committee on the CAR established by Resolution 2127. Indicatively, none of them has taken part in combat operations.

It is unfortunate that professional ethics and firm journalistic principles to distribute only authentic information are just an empty phrase for current US media, which do not hesitate to spin fakes about Russian mercenaries in the CAR and other stories.



https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/15/a...ntl/index.html




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ent/id/4813610
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old October 16th, 2021 #146
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Regarding a New York Times article “Married Kremlin Spies, a Shadowy Mission to Moscow and Unrest in Catalonia”



7 September 2021 - 16:29







Maria Zakharova:

It was with undisguised surprise bordering on admiration that I read a text (it would be a crime against honest journalists to describe it as an “article,” let alone “investigative reporting”) in The New York Times about the alleged contacts an emissary of Catalonia’s top separatist leader, Carles Puigdemont, had in Moscow and far-reaching conclusions from that alleged event. The essence of the text is traditionally revolutionary: Russia is interfering again.

First of all, my colleagues and I decided to do some fact-checking, analysing one paragraph after another in search of details before issuing a political commentary.

I would like to remind you that the issue concerns a “European intelligence report,” which the newspaper’s reporters had a chance to read.

We didn’t have to work hard to establish that this was yet another silly piece of false news.

“In Russia, according to the intelligence report, Mr Alay [Josep Lluis Alay, a senior adviser to former Catalan president Carles Puigdemont] and Mr Dmitrenko [Alexander Dmitrenko, a Russian businessman] met with several active foreign intelligence officers, as well as Oleg V. Syromolotov, … who now oversees counterterrorism as a deputy minister at the Russian foreign ministry.”

This statement is designed as the linchpin in a convoluted scheme to expose these treacherous Russians.

I asked Oleg Syromolotov about the timing and format of the meeting.

It turned out that there were no such meetings in Moscow or anywhere else. Oleg Syromolotov never met with Mr Alay in Moscow or outside of Russia and never maintained any contacts with him.

I went to the trouble to check if we received any requests from the above mentioned newspaper for the confirmation or refutation of this “information.” No, we have not received any requests. This is yet another proof of a pre-planned provocation. Had the newspaper requested this information, it would have been unable to use this “solid proof.”

The question is, who has framed The New York Times? The names of the authors of this masterpiece, Michael Schwirtz and José Bautista, have been added in gold lettering to the global history of fake news.

The New York Times, as well as the other outlets that have reprinted this fake news, not just should but must publish a refutation.





https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/03/w...ia-russia.html




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ent/id/4854379
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old October 16th, 2021 #147
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Anti-Russia campaign in the German media



14 September 2021 - 12:12







The Western propaganda machine persists in its efforts to stir up anti-Russia sentiments by injecting more and more would be sensations and outright fakes into the information space. This includes reports on election meddling in a number of countries, myths about “Russian hackers,” reports claiming that Russian COVID-19 vaccines are unreliable, etc. This list has been recently supplemented by accusations that Russia is behind some kind of “acoustic microwave attacks” against employees of US diplomatic missions in certain countries, the so-called Havana syndrome.[1] Media outlets specialising in conspiracy theories and other biased journalists in the United States, Canada and elsewhere eagerly picked up this topic and unleashed an information campaign against our country.

After the United States and Canada, Der Spiegel started reporting on the Havana syndrome, and published two almost identical articles in just four days, probably to make sure that this malicious subject lingered in the German media space: “Possible acoustic weapon attack against US embassy employees in Berlin” and “Rays from an ambush.”

Both articles refer to the ongoing investigation in the United States about several employees of the US embassy in Berlin suffering from an unexplained illness. They have been experiencing nausea, severe headaches, hearing problems, insomnia, choric fatigue and impaired productivity, and had to ask for medical help. This, according to the authors of the article, suggests that the Havana syndrome has caused these symptoms. Why bother going into too much detail on the headaches and nausea experienced by US diplomats, if there is a ready culprit at hand – Russia?

Der Spiegel journalists, assisted by the infamous falsifiers from Bellingcat, have cast Russia as carrying out some kind of undercover programme designed to impair targeted subscribers remotely using dangerous waves (ultrasound, micro and radio waves) through mobile devices. These “targeted subscribers” were, of course, the US embassy employees in Germany. Most interestingly, they are in charge of working with Russia, including on natural gas projects and cyber security.

The absurdity of these allegations did nothing to dissuade the authors from publishing these articles. They are trying to impose unthinkable interpretations on their readers, claiming that the Russian secret services have somehow delivered the equipment to Germany, a NATO country, in order to expose American diplomats to various waves. However, the authors of this quasi-investigation have not answered the question of why this is happening. There is no evidence to suggest that Russia is somehow responsible for these incidents. They also omit the fact that Russia has never faced any formal accusations in this regard. Having peppered their articles with some data from 6th grade physics, the authors stayed true to the “highly likely” tradition and expected readers to take their word for granted.

There is absolutely no doubt that this is yet another link in the chain of coordinated efforts by the Western media community, acting in the interests of US authorities, to create a negative backdrop around Russia and further undermine Russia-Germany relations.

As for us, we would like to once again draw your attention to the August 5, 2021 statement by the Foreign Ministry spokesperson, which answers all the questions related to the so-called Havana syndrome that US diplomats have been experiencing.



https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/...d-74ff94436026

https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deuts...a-1082b817f569


[1] It is called Havana syndrome because the first cases of this supposed illness were allegedly reported in the US Embassy in Havana, in 2016.




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ent/id/4858005
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old October 30th, 2021 #148
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Disinformation on Russia-Morocco cooperation



28 October 2021 - 10:41







North African colleagues of the Western media are trying to borrow their large-scale practice of disinformation. They do not want to give in to their senior Western colleagues in anything, be it juggling with facts or dissemination of outright lies.

The Al-Shorouk newspaper recently published yet another fake article under the title “Algeria is the reason for the crisis between Russia and Morocco.” There is no doubt that the newspaper can claim a prize in two categories at the same time: as a classic model of disinformation and for false analysis.

The author of the article, Muhammad Muslim, cites a number of facts, as it were: Rabat has suspended flights between Russia and Morocco since October 5; Russian Ambassador Valeryan Shuvayev was summoned back to Russia for consultations; and Moscow decided to postpone a session of the 6th Russian-Arab Cooperation Forum at foreign minister level that was scheduled to be held in Rabat (in reality in Marrakech) on October 28. Lost in wishful thinking, Mr Muslim concludes from the above that “Russia-Morocco relations have reached rock bottom” and are undergoing a crisis that is being carefully concealed by both countries.

Reading such articles, one gets the impression that their authors are staying somewhere in a parallel universe and know nothing about the Covid-19 pandemic that has swept our world since 2020. Many countries, including Russia, have faced yet another wave of the coronavirus infection since this autumn. The Moroccan authorities suspended flights to/from Russia because of the deteriorating sanitary-epidemiological situation in our country. There is no political subtext in this decision at all.

As for the absence of the Russian Ambassador in Morocco, which Mr Muslim is using to justify his tinfoil hat allegations, he is wrong again. In reality, Ambassador Shuvayev was on a planned vacation. He returned to Rabat on October 24 and resumed his duties.

As for “the extremely tense” Russia-Morocco relations, in part, due to stronger cooperation between Russia and Algeria, according to Mr Muslim, this information is divorced from reality and exists only in the mind of the Al-Shorouk author. Incidentally, the reputable publication www.le360.ma (Morocco) quoted the Foreign Ministry of Morocco that bluntly rejected the allegations about a crisis in bilateral relations. The Foreign Ministry of Russia followed suit. During his meeting with Ambassador of Morocco to Russia Lotfi Bouchaara on October 21, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov said he was perplexed by the allegations spread by a number of media outlets about a cooling of relations between Moscow and Rabat. The Russian diplomat said that mutually beneficial versatile bilateral cooperation is making steady headway and that Russian Ambassador to Morocco Shuvayev is playing a big role in promoting it.

It is an open secret that many countries, including external players, are very disappointed by Moscow’s growing ties with Algeria, Mali, Morocco and other regional countries. They are using any means, including disinformation, to drive a wedge into our bilateral relations and damage them. It is a pity Mr Muslim did not bother to analyse the issue seriously but simply produced this fake article, apparently to curry favour with our opponents.

Original article in arabic: https://bit.ly/2ZEscRZ




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ynamic=novelty
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old November 24th, 2021 #149
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

“Tanks and Migrants: Putin's Grip on the European Union.” Maria Zakharova’s response to the article by Editor in Chief of La Repubblica Maurizio Molinari



17 November 2021 - 23:27







Mr Maurizio Molinari, I was delighted to read your article in La Repubblica. I haven't read such magnificent nonsense in a long time.

I understand why none of your subordinates signed the material, and you personally had to take on this shameful mission. Not a single self-respecting journalist would want their name to be seen under the heading “Tanks and Migrants: Putin's Grip on the European Union.”

But first things first.

The article says: “... we observed the arrival of Russian military units at the border with Ukraine: we are talking about at least 90,000 troops with armoured vehicles and artillery ... the army has created a base in Yelnya, which is 260 km north of the Ukrainian border.”

Mr Molinari, perhaps you have heard the United States claiming that Russia is concentrating troops on the border with Ukraine, but have not read the official communiqué issued by the Ukrainian Defence Ministry refuting the US irrational fears. Clearly, you are not aware of Moscow's position in principle. Why bother when you can, without any fact-checking, up and write about “the creation of a base with armoured vehicles and artillery in Yelnya.” There’s no base. There is no such thing as military bases in our country. We have units of the Russian armed forces deployed on our national territory, which is our sovereign right, does not violate Russia’s international obligations and is part, as they like to say, including in NATO, of “routine activities.”

Your wandering across the Russian reality does not end there. You write that Yelnya is located 260 km away from the Ukrainian border. So, are our tanks on the border or 260 kilometres away from it?

If La Repubblica’s editor-in-chief has a poor idea of ​​where Yelnya is located (which is unlikely, though, as you wrote a whole article about it), then I think you must be familiar with the fact that Switzerland is located between France and Italy at a distance which is even less than 260 km. Will La Repubblica write tomorrow that “Bern is one step away from attacking Italy and France at the same time,” since absolutely all Swiss troops are closer to the borders of these countries than Yelnya is to Ukraine?

Doesn't this flawed logic catch the eye of La Repubblica readers? What you are allowing yourself is unbecoming for an honest journalist.

“... In 2014, Russia intervened after the presidential candidate it supported lost the election in Ukraine ... the threat of invasion aims to keep the new president of Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky, in check ...,” you go on to write in your piece.

What “Russia-supported candidate” lost the election in 2014? Are you talking about Viktor Yanukovych? He was not Russia’s candidate, but a candidate supported by the people of southeastern Ukraine. And he did not lose, but won, and not in 2014, but in 2010.

Moreover, he won the previous elections before that in 2004. But in order not to let him take office then, the Ukrainian opposition, with the support of its Western patrons, came up with an outrageous procedure and a mockery of democracy in the form of a “third round” of elections, unleashed the “orange revolution” and dragged Viktor Yushchenko into the office of the Ukrainian president. In 2010, Viktor Yanukovych won again with the broad support of southeastern Ukraine, and this time the West was left with no chance to overrule the Ukrainian people’s choice. The United States and the EU decided to postpone the putsch to a more opportune time, which came in 2013 when Viktor Yanukovych suddenly became a political pariah after he postponed the signing of the EU association agreement. A couple of months later, under the leadership of the United States, another Maidan protest was held in Ukraine where US Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland handed out money, cookies and assurances of unconditional support to the “revolutionaries.” Mr Molinari, Viktor Yanukovych did not run for office in 2014. He left Ukraine because if he had stayed there, he would have been killed by Ukrainian radicals who executed, blew up, beaten to death and burned hundreds of their fellow citizens.

Your ignorance of the matter at hand is astounding.

I really liked the expression “keep in check,” which you use with regard to Russia’s policy in Ukraine and personally Vladimir Zelensky. First, it's a beautiful turn of phrase. Second, chess has not been outlawed yet, has it? Or, only if the Russians aren’t winning?

But there's a problem. There is no king in Ukraine, because pawns can only become queens.

Since Ukraine gained independence, Russia's policy regarding its sovereignty has been aimed exclusively at building neighbourly relations with that country. We endlessly clarify what happened in Crimea in 2014, and the West endlessly turns a deaf ear to what we are saying. Each attempt to state the facts runs into “articles” similar to yours which distort reality.

Still, I will say it again. In 2014, after the unconstitutional coup in Ukraine, which was another outcome of Western interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state, people living in Crimea made their historic choice as they fled the nationalist and illegal extremist rampage and held a referendum. They had tried to hold one on several occasions prior to that, but were not allowed to. When something gets published in your newspaper about the “illegitimate expression of the will of the Crimea residents” next time, please remind your readers that there was no such thing as a referendum in Kosovo, but Western countries, including Italy, recognised its “sovereignty” contrary to UN Security Council Resolution 1244, which clearly stipulates Serbia’s territorial integrity including Kosovo as its part.

With regard to migrants, you write “Concurrently, Putin is creating another crisis situation as he supports Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko in his decision to transport thousands of migrants from Asia and the Middle East to the Polish border in order to create a new explosive field for a conflict with the EU.”

Mr Molinari, you seem to have read a lot of Polish “field reports” and repeat like a mantra endless accusations against Alexander Lukashenko and, for some reason, the Russian President in “creating an explosive field for conflicts” and “a crisis situation.” Seriously?

I would like to refer you to the Italian Interior Ministry’s website, specifically the “Migration Statistics” section. This wonderful Italian website recently updated its information and clearly states that the number of migrants who are now being abused by the Polish security forces from across the border is dwarfed by the number of illegal immigrants from Africa who were allowed into the EU through Italy alone. Over 2,000 people in just three days in November and over 60,000 since the beginning of the year. Many of them arrived through Libya, which was destroyed by the West, and I will cover this later. The current events on the Bug River are just a vivid picture however, clearly showing the level of inhumanity of the border guards from an EU member state.

Now, the question is: when will La Repubblica write that by their insane actions the United States and NATO countries “have created an explosive field for conflicts and a crisis situation in Europe?”

Brussels should look for real reasons behind the migration crisis in the EU in the old statements by the leaders of the anti-Iraq and anti-Libya coalitions and heads of state and government of the countries that encouraged the Arab Spring and were doing heaven knows what in Afghanistan for 20 years.

And further: “It is notable that all this has coincided with the upcoming launch of Nord Stream 2, which will increase Europe’s dependence on Russian gas, as well as with Moscow’s hostility towards potential climate agreements.”

I would like to say a few words about gas, Europe’s dependence and the environment, since you have decided to lump together all issues on the current agenda in what you have defined as “an editorial.” Italy alone receives up to 20 billion cubic metres of Russian gas annually. Not once did Moscow let down or cheat Rome. How does your conscience as an Italian journalist allow you to write such offensive rubbish about Russian energy suppliers?

Mr Molinari, do you personally have something against Russian gas? Very well. Here’s an idea for you: why don’t you try throwing La Repubblica onto the fire to get your house warm? As an act of protest?

Who gave you the right to sling mud at my country? Are you looking for a sensation? I have an exclusive for you: publish a single truthful phrase in your newspaper, “No other gas supplier in Europe is more reliable than Russia.”

And now let’s have a look at “dependence.” The meaning of this word clearly escapes you. The life of every one of us depends on a vast number of things without which we would die – water, sun, oxygen, and so on. Is this driving you crazy? As for the Russian gas, the situation is much more serene than the likelihood of an earthquake in Sicily or a flood in Venice. Russian gas has always been and will always be there for you. Stop deceiving your readers and stop panicking. Enjoy every day, even though everything is interdependent in this world: people depend on each other, life depends on the sun, and plants depend on water.

There is no point even commenting on your deliberations about the Russian environmental policy. Our environmental priorities, which are quite progressive even by European standards, have been voiced by the President of Russia at the recent high-level events. Mr Molinari, if you are really interested in the Russian agenda, I suggest that you at least read the statements made in your country. In his video address to the G20 summit, which was held in Rome, by the way, President Putin said: “The low-carbon power industry is growing at a rapid pace in Russia. The share of energy generated from practically carbon-free sources such as nuclear power plants, hydroelectric dams, wind and solar power plants exceeds 40 percent today, or 86 if we include natural gas, which is the lowest-carbon fuel among hydrocarbons. This is one of the best indicators in the world. According to international experts, Russia is among global decarbonisation leaders.”

And lastly, Libya: “Even Turkey has been ensnared in President Putin’s European web … primarily because of their converging interests in Libya, which boil down to preventing the elections scheduled to take place on December 24.”

I would like to remind you that the President of Russia signed the final document of the Second Berlin Conference on Libya and that Russia is one of the few countries – let’s admit this, there are only a few countries ¬– that are helping, even amid the current problems, to promote normalisation and political dialogue in a country the West has destroyed. Russia sent a high representative (Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov) to the Paris International Conference for Libya and coordinated its Final Declaration. Sergey Lavrov has pointed out several times, including in his public statements, that the main thing now is to comply with the timeframe that Libyans themselves coordinated a year ago, above all when it comes to the elections, both presidential and parliamentary ones. Wouldn’t you say that this stands in direct contrast with what you have written?

As for the web in which Europe has allegedly been ensnared, I suggest recalling how the West distorted UN Security Council Resolution 1973 on Libya. Back in 2011, UN Security Council established a no-fly zone over Libya, which some NATO countries used not to protect peaceful civilians but to bomb out the country. This led to the collapse of the Libyan state, the barbaric murder of Muammar Gaddafi and a years-long migration crisis in Europe, which has hit Italy the hardest. Didn’t you know any of this? Feel free to ask us for information. I will be delighted to share it with you, including the link to the UN website.

And lastly, there is an inconspicuous element in your text. You ask how the EU of Macron, Scholz and Draghi will react to the rapidly growing Russian hybrid war.

The short answer is, “It won’t.” It won’t react because there is no Russian hybrid war. It is a myth, the same as you article. Stop promoting this myth, trying to ingratiate yourself with Russophobic politicians.

Please, show some respect for your readers. Italians don’t deserve such impudent lies.



In Italian - https://roma.mid.ru/it/press-centre/...a_14_11_21_ris




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ent/id/4946308
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old November 24th, 2021 #150
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Investigation by RTL Nieuws website containing allegations on Russia security services



23 November 2021 - 11:22







Much of what is being said about the tragic downing of the MH17 flight over Donbass in 2014 has its rightful place in the Fake News section of our website. It seems that the Dutch journalists could not be satisfied with the streams of unproven lies they have been penning while covering the court proceedings on this case. It is probably for this reason that they keep coming up with new, increasingly far-fetched news stories.

On October 28, 2021, RTL Nieuws, a Dutch website, published yet another classic example of misinformation. The article alleges that members of the Russian security services have been exerting pressure on the lawyers representing the families of victims from the Malaysian Airlines Boeing. This time, however, instead of letting their fantasies, even if quite scant, run wild, they were simply short of ideas. It is probably for this reason that they illustrated the supposed intimidation with the following examples:

- two lawyers had the impression that after one of the hearings their car was being followed.

- one lawyer saw a man wearing sunglasses near his home, “walking around in an unusual manner.”

Evidence of this kind can hardly be sufficient to make allegations regarding a large-scale operation by Russian security services. Cars do drive around, and Dutch lawyers can hardly pretend to know every car on the road, while making guesses on whether there is anything “unusual” about a person walking around is a strange thing to do. Still, this was enough for the journalists and their would-be experts.

We will refrain from diagnosing the lawyers and the journalists who provide these lawyers publicity in the media, as well as what clearly amounts to political advertising, as suffering from a paranoid disorder, which is a grave disease, and will leave this question to medical professionals. Still, we cannot fail to note a significant decline in the quality of planted misinformation that is being publicised in the Dutch media. Having fallen to the level of tabloids, the Dutch media unscrupulously make up various complex conspiracies, their masterminds and beneficiaries.

The fact that these “secret operations” exist only in the imagination of the Dutch seems to be obvious to everyone.

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/nede...d-door-rusland




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ynamic=novelty
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old December 1st, 2021 #151
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Debunking a misleading editorial “Ookbuitenlandse critici staat steeds meer wille keur en intimidatie van Rusland te wachten” (Trouw newspaper)



30 November 2021 - 15:53







In neuroscience and psychology, apophenia is the tendency to perceive structures and connections between random unrelated pieces of data, events or phenomena. In recent years, we have seen many Western media outlets trying to outcompete one another in terms of the severity of this ailment. Recently, the newspaper Trouw gave a master class with a demonstration of a case of apophenia in its editorial column titled “Foreign Critics Facing Growing Arbitrariness and Intimidation from Russia.”

Quite expectedly, the reason for this was that the Dutch journalist from Volkskrant, Thomas Wennink, was denied entry to Russia. His colleagues from Trouw, who humbly chose to remain anonymous, came up with a bunch of conspiracy theories, including the MH17 case proceedings, the Scythian Gold and unsolicited comments by the Dutch authorities regarding Russia’s domestic politics, be it the developments in Crimea or regulating the media in the country. They also brought up the story of the correspondent Sarah Rainsford, whose journalistic accreditation was revoked solely as a response to the harassment unleashed by London against the Russian media, which border on outright mockery and humiliation. The upshot, however, is not as exciting as the weird and not entirely healthy logic of the anonymous authors whereby the media, including foreign, are given a hard time in Russia. We have heard this before.

It is particularly funny to see the editorial staff of Trouw refer to the Russian Interior Ministry’s administrative decision on the Dutch journalist as “sanctions.” Given that The Hague itself is an active proponent of using the sanctions truncheon against Russia, it seems that journalists in the Netherlands are measuring everyone by their own yardstick.

And they are doing so instead of disclosing the real reason for refusing to renew Thomas Wennink’s residence permit, which both the Interior Ministry and the Foreign Ministry have repeatedly made known publicly.

He has repeatedly violated the regulations governing a foreign correspondent’s stay and work in Russia. In November 2019, the Dutchman failed to register with the migration authorities within the timeframe approved by law. He was well aware of the registration requirement, but he deliberately, if not provocatively, ignored it. In addition, last year, the correspondent travelled to the Chukotka Autonomous Area without the approval of the local authorities. As is known, this district is on the list of territories that regulate visits by foreign nationals. The correspondent was notified about this in advance by regional officials. And yet, with a violation already on his record, Thomas Wennink ignored this requirement as well, after which the Interior Ministry, guided exclusively by the Russian law, ruled to deny the Dutchman entry to Russia.

This story can be seen as politically motivated only by a biased person or an apophenia patient. It is up to the people who read these crude fakes to decide which of these two is applicable in the case of the Trouw’s editorial staff.

https://www.trouw.nl/opinie/ook-buit...hten~b90055b8/




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ynamic=novelty
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old December 4th, 2021 #152
Mick Walker
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 996
jewsign Blinken: US and European allies ‘stand resolutely against’ Russia

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has again threatened Russia with "serious consequences" if it launches any military action in neighboring Ukraine and said that the United States and European allies are determined to “stand resolutely against” Russia, despite the fact that Moscow has rejected Washington’s allegations of preparing to invade the eastern European country.*

In an interview with the*Reuters*news agency on Friday, Blinken accused Russia of preparing for an attack on Ukraine by building up troops at the northern and eastern Ukrainian border.

He claimed that Russia is coordinating its activities, including the building of forces on its border with Ukraine, the threat of holding back natural gas to Europe this winter, and the support of Belarus’s weaponization of migrants on European borders.

“I think these things are joined,” Blinken said.

“But here's what's important — in everything that I heard from talking to European colleagues in the last few days, at NATO, and then at the [Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe], there is not just the shared concern about what Russia is doing, but a determination to stand resolutely against it.”

More here...

https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2021/1...2%80%99-Russia


Notice how it is the juden in positions of power pushing Russia into a corner. It's always ✡ FILTH
 
Old December 4th, 2021 #153
Johan
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 4,231
Default

Alex, I see you refer to Dutch articles, now the following on this.

The smear campaign against Russia reaches a peak in Holland, has everything to do with Ukraine and the gas pipeline. The membership of NATO for Ukraine is also high on the agenda of the Jewish pawns/slaves in Holland and the rest of the EU.
 
Old December 6th, 2021 #154
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan View Post
Alex, I see you refer to Dutch articles, now the following on this.

The smear campaign against Russia reaches a peak in Holland, has everything to do with Ukraine and the gas pipeline. The membership of NATO for Ukraine is also high on the agenda of the Jewish pawns/slaves in Holland and the rest of the EU.
Johan, I am not referring to Dutch articles.

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs refers to Dutch articles, and I just bring this information to the forum.
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Old December 6th, 2021 #155
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,834
Blog Entries: 219
Post

Another anti-Russian article in the German newspaper Bild Response by Maria Zakharova



4 December 2021 - 22:54







It appears that Bild did some digging into the German archives, made a few changes with some correction fluid and posted the article, Putin's Plan for Invasion of Ukraine. All things new are simply the well-forgotten old, and Germany does not tire of trying to provide proof of this saying, giving us more ideology-based propaganda that cancels out any common sense.

Let's set things straight.

Lviv is marked on the map as Lemberg, while the modern city’s name in German is Lwiw – the one that is used in official materials by the German Federal Foreign Office. On the city’s map of 1942, when it was under occupation, the place was mentioned as Lemberg – the Austro-Hungarian name used at the time by its Nazi occupants. The question is exactly what map did the authors of the article use?

The map of eastern Ukraine was apparently sent [to German authors] directly from Bankovaya Street, with the city of Dnepropetrovsk marked as Dnipro, to which it was renamed only five years ago during the so-called de-communisation campaign.

So, they put it all together and saw something was missing – and they decided this was a plan for attack.

Apparently, we should seek their ‘source of inspiration’ across the pond: only yesterday the Washington Post posted a similar map mentioning Russia’s alleged invasion of Ukraine (I have already made my comments on these bogus stories today). The Germans have taken a creative approach to US images – and took it a step further, with their love for marching on Kiev.

The initial stage of the ‘invasion,’ which Bild called “South,” includes attacking Ukraine’s southern regions to cut off the country’s access to the sea and to ensure supply lines to Crimea. German ‘wunder-journalists’ totally have no idea that the Crimean Bridge has been used for these purposes for several years now – and apparently, Kiev is also to blame for Germany’s being clueless because, according to statements by Ukrainian experts, no bridge exists as its construction is impossible.

The second stage of the ‘invasion’ calls for the weakening of Ukraine’s defensive capacity with ballistic missile attacks. Dubbed “Northeast,” this stage is designed to allegedly be conducted in parallel with the first one. Dear friends, but what does Russia have to do with this? For several years, the Kiev regime has been successfully degrading Ukraine’s defensive capacity on its own.

The third stage, “Kiev,” involves an offensive against Ukraine’s capital from the north. After advancing “approximately to the Korosten-Uman line,” the Russian army will “force Kiev to surrender.”

The city of Uman is known as a location of the annual pilgrimage of Hasidim. What is Bild getting at? In Germany, people have already gotten used to fake news – but this example of German trolling may come at a cost for the newspaper, given the recently found fact of blatant anti-Semitism among German journalists.

So Bild journalists used three pieces of the puzzle to pull together this nonsense and then left to enjoy their weekend feeling satisfied.

So why not spoil it for them?

http://www.bild.de/politik/ausland/p...5518.bild.html




The source of information - https://www.mid.ru/en/nedostovernie-...ynamic=novelty
__________________
Where should they dig the Very Deep Pit?
Piglet said that the best place would be somewhere where a Heffalump was, just before he fell into it, only about a foot farther on.
(c) Alan Alexander Miln
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.
Page generated in 0.19285 seconds.