Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 31st, 2014 #61
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Here is something Americans will never in a million years think of doing, the Swedish Resistance Movement actually has all these violent Leftist groups infiltrated and collects information on them online and in real life. There is now an ongoing trial into a left-wing paramilitary antifa group called "Revolutionary Front", and the Swedish Resistance Movement is providing a lot of the information they've been collecting on them while on the inside.

Leftists do this to WN's in America, but I've yet to see anyone do the reverse. Those commie faggots are more afraid of you than you are of them, but nobody ever thinks of bringing a video camera to film the scum, then putting their faces up to ID them. Not only that, but Swedish Resistance Movement i've noticed also sends plain clothes/unaffiliated camera guys to stand among the Leftists and film them from behind their lines.

These guys are always two steps ahead of their foes. All the assholes who think that the state is going to protect your civil liberties, the opposite is actually true. The police doesn't investigate Leftist crimes, but if you really compile a huge list of damning evidence, they'll be forced to deal with it in some shape or form.

https://www.nordfront.se/revolutiona...onstration.smr

Quote:
Today, North Front reveal new information on the Revolutionary Front, RF , because we come across new chat logs that have been added to the old criminal investigation into the ongoing trial of six RF - members.

North Front will probably publish more details of the new chat logs, but today we can start by saying that the Revolutionary Front planned to attack the Resistance big demonstration in Bollnäs 2012.

It's an IM conversation from August 11, 2012 as Linus Soinjoki Wallin informed by someone calling themselves Rasmus that some within the RF started planning an attack on the Resistance rally in Bollnäs to be held two weeks later.

plan

Rasmus and Soinjoki Wallin then discuss on " dk " , a nickname for AFA , would be mixed into the attack or not. They note that they have to be many to attack the Resistance , although they underestimated the number of participants in the demonstration to 20-50 people ( ultimately concluded around 100 national up in the demonstration ) .

50 SMR

Soinjoki Wallin complain that RF can not pull together as many good members in Stockholm . " It's a big fucking problem ," he writes . Therefore came Soinjoki Wallin and Rasmus concluded that both RF in Stockholm and Gothenburg would bring their sample members on the planned attack .

too few in rf Stockholm

Finally say left extremists to attack could be " the year's best thing" .

pepper

Someone attacked Bollnas was never off.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old April 28th, 2014 #62
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Solskeniskyn
Default

Feminism – unneeded and destructive

By Paulina Forslund
paulina.forslund@nordfront.se



Who benefits from feminism ? The women ? I would argue that feminism as the magnificent during the last decades rather loose women more than it helped them.

Nowadays, feminism something that you almost have to feel good. If you find the "right" one must also be a feminist . But in fact it is translucent and the least unnecessary. Another thing that speaks against the Western feminists so very much is their tendency to craze for all sorts of strangers, especially by men , who come here .

Then , indeed , one can respond to men with understanding without equal. If an immigrant man rapes a Swedish is often feminists there and gape at how racist it is to single out immigrant men as potential rapists . That one then in the same breath can pull all the white Western men with the same brush is to me incomprehensible .

I guess it all falls on one thing: Hypocrisy . When it all comes down to it and it stands between where you win the most " goodness score" choosing instead to immigrant men party . Although they actually recently committed a rape.

We all remember the extremely rabid columnist Lisa Magnusson, who unashamedly declared their support and understanding of the men who have committed one of the rudest group rape in Swedish history. Magnusson, who otherwise written lyrics that reeks of outright feminist man-hating now became a defender of male - male immigrants .

Personally, I shun feminism like the plague. I believe that it instead increases the gap between men and women. Additionally affect the destructive both sexes. Instead of embracing the female tends feminism's supporters to behave more and more like men.

Strange because the men behind the alleged patriarchy is enemy number one. Still, many feminists like men . And in his unnatural eagerness to create a greater imbalance , they want to top it all, the men become feminine and behave like women. And this despite the fact that the next second you can spew empty rhetoric that gender differences do not exist.

We do not need a gender war in Sweden . Our country is facing much bigger problems than that. It is therefore disappointing to hear young women who think feminism seriously is something worth following . They do not realize that you can never achieve harmony and true equality by opposing men.

But you know what? Our Swedish men are not the enemy! They never have been and never will be. The truth is that the vast majority of Swedish men behave very well towards the opposite sex. Therefore, feminists gambit downright ridiculous .

I can without hesitation tell you that feminism in every way gone way past the " best before date " . Yes, it is so antiquated that those who lingers literally stinks of old and often totally unjustified man-hating . It is simply time to toss it in the nearest garbage can.

The meaning of feminism has served its purpose long ago. The fact is that the real kvinnorättsförkämparna in our latitudes , such as Fredrika Bremer, saw the light and accomplished great deeds before feminism became a time concept. Therefore, we can here and now say that feminism is dead and therefore redundant.

I think women should embrace their feminine qualities and the men their masculinity . If we succeed in this, and strive to better relate naturally to each other , we can in time regain a balance. A balance that our pre-Christian ancestors sorely nursed .

Today's feminists sow discord between men and women. Their agenda is often quite different from what they themselves seek to give the impression of creating divisions within the people. I think everyone should be able to see through this ugly pickpocketing. That feminism destroys far more than it does good.

Google translated https: https://www.nordfront.se/feminismen-...destruktiv.smr
 
Old June 12th, 2014 #63
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Solskeniskyn
Default

Nordic Resistance Movement district-leader Pär Sjögren convicted for hate speech ("incitement to racial hatred") and fined on the grounds of having tweeted: "Death to Zion. Long live Golden Dawn.".

Sweden's arbitrarily applied draconian speech-crime laws rivals those of the UK in grim absurdity.

Quote:
Pär Sjögren convicted of posts on Twitter

RESISTANCE MOVEMENT. Today was sentenced Pär Sjögren against its negative for the crime of incitement to racial hatred by Falu District Court. The judgment relates to two messages posted on Sjogren Twitter.

Earlier today announced Falu District Court to Pär Sjögren, head of the Resistance fifth nest, convicted of incitement to racial hatred. The penalty was a daily fine of 5,000 kronor.

The district court said that two posts on Sjogren's Twitter account incited against Jews. One of the posts contained a picture of an ugly creature that ate up the Sweden Democrats' (kosher nationalists)party symbol.

The district court held that the ugly figure symbolized the Jewish people. The second panel included the following text:

Quote:
Death to zion. Long live the Golden Dawn.
The post was published in conjunction with the Zionist organizations demanded that the Greek nationalist party Golden Dawn would be banned, but the district court nevertheless chose to interpret that post incited against Jews, not Zionists.

Sjögren himself denies that it is he who has published two posts on Twitter, claiming that other than himself have access to the account and can post things on it. Furthermore mean Sjögren that posts should reasonably be interpreted as criticism of the Zionists, do not hate the Jewish people. Therefore, the decision will be appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Realistens chief editor, Bjorn Björkqvist, has written a chronicle of the judgment and short interviews with Sjögren concerning the judgment.

Björkqvist pointed out the following scathing fact:

We have a society where it is free to post pictures where a parliamentary politicians are abused because it can not be taken as threatening, while it is an offense to publish a picture of a Jew munching a flower. Both images expressing criticism of the Sweden Democrats, but only the one that includes violence and blood is legal.

Finally writes Björkqvist that he wants to hate speech law to be abolished when the law is not being used "to prevent the incitement of hatred, but to judge inconvenient voices'.
 
Old June 14th, 2014 #64
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Solskeniskyn
Thumbs up

(Machine-translation that has undergone a rough unauthorized face-lift by me in order to read better.)

National Socialism in our time

By Klas Lund
klas.lund@nordfront.se
Leader of the Resistance Movement



______________________________________________________________


NATIONAL SOCIALISM. Resistance leader Klas Lund writes in this article that National Socialism has to adapt to the prevailing conditions, without thereby losing its essence.


Hitler was, in my opinion, one of the last millennium's biggest personalities. But precisely because of it, and the extreme conflict that was fought, posterity has difficulties in judging him properly. Too much emotion, propaganda and political interests stand in the way. But it's not just the outside world that have problems with Hitler and the idea that he stood for, but us to.

We, recognizing him as one of the greatest reformers, should not indulge in any cultic or religious worship of him. Such an irrational element will not help the fight ahead. Hitler was a man like any other, with strengths and weaknesses. A man who appeared at a difficult time and who not only took good decisions but also bad. Acknowledging this, one can admire and appreciate him as a great man even more, instead of indulging in the fantasy that he was some sort of demigod.

We must soberly look at the situation and the world around us, and all irrational elements is to our disadvantage. We also have to look at ourselves self-critically, and we must recognize that the struggle cannot be allowed to devolve into sectarian "NSDAP-orthodoxy", just because the light from the Third Reich days shines so bright. Such tendencies within our organization must be fought because they are not constructive.

However, we should keep it as an important task to rehabilitate Hitler and give him his rightful place in history. Moreover, it is an absolute necessity to do so for our cause's rebirth, and in order to be able to defeat our enemies. Fighting for his rightful place in history is part of the ideological battle, but that does not mean that we as a political movement should praise him or highlight him in our everyday struggle. We must learn to make this distincion.

We must admit that even Hitler could make misjudgments and that we as a people, who live almost 70 years after his death, should not have to defend every action he or his government committed. Nor are we in any way tied to the NSDAP party programs or the Third Reich policy. By seeing the errors that the Third Reich committed, we can avoid repeating them.

We must understand that the political map has been redrawn dramatically since World War II. Today, Russia is not communist, Germany is not National Socialist, etc.. Old friends and alliances are no more, and today, former friends might be our enemies, and vice versa. We can not use an outdated map and its conditions as a guide. If we do, we will go in the wrong direction. Historical knowledge is something that should give us the ability to understand the present and the future; it should not blind us.

Nor should we national socialists put too much emphasis on States' artificial boundaries. We are neither cultural or ethno-nationalists, although National Socialism evolved from nationalist ideological currents. Our loyalty is not currently bound by any particular state, on the contrary. Boundaries have always been drawn on and will continue to be re-drawn in the future. The geopolitical situation - and thus the necessary strategies - are in a constant flux.

If National Socialism is to survive and become competitive in the present and in the future, it must adapt. This without thereby losing its essence. Of course it is a difficult balancing act. Nevertheless, it is necessary. You could argue that it might be in some ways easier to abandon the frame of National Socialism altogether, and call ourselves something else, but that would be weak and defensive, and in practice it would push us towards liberalization. However, again, accepting ideological stagnation is neither that an option, as it is guaranteed to result in permanent marginalization.

The choice for us is not to choose between "liberalism" or "conservatism" in terms of national socialism. Our choice must instead be ideological development. Instead of taking a step back in history and choose an ideologically vague concepts such as nationalism, we must work to strengthen national socialism as a clear ideology for our time, to make it fit our needs here and now, like a living organism evolving or a technology advancing to meet new challenges.

We must be able to bring about change without rejecting or denying the essential national socialism. Our goal is not to dress our national socialism up or to replace it with some weaker ersatz ideology. Our goal is to develop the ultimate national socialism for our time. This is one of our main tasks at present. How we manage to resolve it remains to be seen. But if anyone can accomplish this without being compromized, it is us.

https://www.nordfront.se/nationalsoc...en-var-tid.smr Google-translated https

Last edited by Solskeniskyn; June 14th, 2014 at 05:02 AM.
 
Old October 11th, 2014 #65
Patrik Sten
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
Patrik Sten
Default

Swedish Resistance Movement is starting a political party:

(machine translation)

Resistance forms a parliamentary branch
Klas Lund
By Klas Lund, 2014-10-02
klas.lund@nordfront.se


PUBLICATION. Resistance has decided to form a parliamentary branch, a party that will represent the organization's views on choice. Nordic Resistance officials Klas Lund explains here why.

We have within the organization discussed the formation of a parliamentary branch for a long time. Back in the spring was decided that it was time to realize plans to form a party that can carry the Nordic resistance movement's positions and promote its objectives.

We decided, however, to wait to go out with this until just after the 2014 elections partly because we do not have time to make a serious effort in this election, partly because we do not want it to appear that we were creating divisions within the national movement by creating another national party just before the election.

That we now form the party does not mean that the Nordic resistance movement becomes a party. The party becomes the Resistance parliamentary branch and is therefore thought to be only a part of the business, we also, when capacity is available, intends to expand further.

That we form a parliamentary branch does not involve any change of direction at all. On the contrary, I have always seen this as necessary in the long term, and as anyone knows who has been in the leading position in the Resistance which such discussions have been held. I also have someone occasionally seen to make public statements that keep this road open.

However, I understand that some may see with concern on this. They may also fear that we now walked on the liberalization bandwagon. But I give you my word that it will never happen. Turnout will never be with us to become an end in itself. We will never let what we see as watered-down parliamentary government take over in front of a holistic approach in which Sweden - and the Nordic countries - can only be recaptured by a strong force. A strong force which our parliamentary branch will only be a - of several - coordinated parts.

The party will be radical, forthright and differ distinctly from the other parties, in terms of both message and organization.

That we form the party instead of allowing Swedes Party (SVP) alone represent the national movement in the parliamentary arena is probably something that some might question. Some might argue that we thus "divides the movement." It is therefore appropriate to take this up and answer it.

The national movement is already "split" in that there are differing schools of thought (eg, ethno-nationalism and national socialism) and widely differing views on how the fight should be. Nordic Council of Resistance and SvP simply stands for different views and different solutions. It has never existed any cooperation between the Resistance and SvP.

For the sake of it, I have a couple of weeks ago offered SvP negotiating possible merger and waited for their response before this publication. In all honesty, I myself was very hesitant about this, but was nevertheless prepared to give negotiations a genuine chance of SvP had accepted. However, it is not easy to merge two very different organizations. It had become the least difficult to reach a solution where both parties in practice had a significant but acceptable compromises.

SvP answered no and the question of a "united movement" is thus, in my opinion completely utagerad.

In the end it's about the policies that will shape the national movement in the future. Is there such our ideas of national socialism and a united and strong Nordic region or the ideas that ethno-nationalism and the revival of a Swedish nation-state? In these and other issues we differ quite a lot from SvP.

These differences may not be perceived so clearly the common man in the present. You might not think that these differences ought to matter, that it is irrelevant and that we should instead unite around an issue such as immigration and resistance beyond that have "high ceilings". But migration resistance is only something that, at best, can slow the destructive process we face, not set up a real alternative to the current system. And this, long-term policy, to have visions and goals that we are fighting for, is vital to the national movement should not förstelna to, or even be that, a reactionary fossils.

The differences can not be ignored, but is crucial for the policies that will dominate the national movement in the future and how things will unfold.

If we do not at present had formed a parliamentary branch had it to us in virtually the same as the more or less give up, accept future marginalization and let others views and a different politics dominate. We are simply obliged to use the means provided and realize that now is about winning or disappear.

Concretely, we will soon begin a petition to register the new party. This will require 1500 signatures and I hope that many of you reading this will help by signing. In connection with the petition, we will also publish the name of the party and its party platform.

https://www.nordfront.se/motstandsro...arisk-gren.smr
 
Old October 11th, 2014 #66
Patrik Sten
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
Patrik Sten
Default

(machine translation)

Klas Lund about the new party
Of the editor, 2014-10-05
redaktionen@nordfront.se

Resistance. North Front interviewed Resistance leader Klas Lund about the new party organization that is building up.

Last Thursday announced Nordic Resistance that in Sweden will form a party. Interest in the party formation was large and significant debate in the comment field on the North Front and basically all major media reported on the news.

North Front has been in contact with the Resistance leaders, Klas Lund, to interview him and get answers to some of the questions our readers may have about the new party.

In the last article, you wrote that the decision to form the party was taken in the spring. What was behind that decision?

We have had discussions about the formation of parties for a long time. The goal has always been there, but has not previously been considered to be realizable. Now we have instead ended up in a situation where we know the contrary, that we can not wait much longer, that the historical trend will then run away from us. Destructive policies of those in power in Sweden benefits clearly a growth in the national movement, and I think one can safely predict that this trend can only grow stronger. Although development has unfortunately the Swedish people reacted too late and too lame. There is obviously an almost morbid operation of the Swedes to adapt even when it goes against their own interests and contrary to all logic.

One of our most important tasks will be to radicalize the national movement and not allow the resistance movements channeled to more oriented towards adaptation.

The next stage of party formation is therefore to collect 1,500 signatures. Do you think it will be easy or difficult?


It is difficult to estimate how long it will take. Simply, it is not well, but of course we will get it done. An aggravating factor is that we are very controversial, which may lead some to not dare to sign even if they would like. Should the unlikely not be 1500 people who are willing to write on, then it is probably time to pronounce the death of these people.

The names of those who sign the petition will come in any case not be made public?

No it will not be, name lists presented to a notary (a lawyer) who then certifies them. Petitions will then not be sent with the application to the election authority but only the certificate. Name lists will then be destroyed.

Efforts are also on a party program. When do you think it will be finished?

Relatively soon.

Can you already say what will be the party's main issues?

Nordic Council of Resistance is a revolutionary organization and the party program will reflect that. The program will in all probability to present a complete solution and show that most questions are in fact interrelated and can hardly be solved separately, but only through radical changes in society at large. The party program will therefore include an explanation of long-term goals and visions.

As for the individual questions is an end to mass immigration and future repatriation obvious questions that will be included in the party program. Sweden to leave the EU and our goal of a united and strong Nordic region are also key issues that will have a prominent place. But this is far from the only one; economic, environmental, animal welfare issues, and much else will have an important place in the program.

In the last article, you wrote that the party will "be radical, forthright and differ distinctly from the other parties, in terms of both message and organization." Could you tell us more about how the party organisationally will work and how the Party's relationship with the Resistance will look like?


The party will be part of the Resistance, which means that it represents the resistance movement and will work to realize its goals. The party will certainly be managed as a separate organization, but for practical reasons there will not be any really clear distinction between the party and the Resistance. This is partly because many potential representatives in the party also will be responsible positions in the Resistance. In the future, if the party grows, perhaps the boundary between the organization and the party becomes more clear as we recruit more people going in for the party instead of having come from the organization. It may be added that all the details of the party's organization is not entirely clear as yet, but we will work out the details and additionally try out so we can find what works best.

Will the party formed only exist in Sweden and throughout the Nordic region? Will the other Nordic countries have their own parties?


Our ambition is to produce similar parties in the other Nordic countries when the time is ripe. At the moment, this will not take place outside Sweden.

The interest of the party seems to be very large, but at the moment it is probably difficult for people who want to help to know how they should proceed. Is there any way people can help in addition to contribute their signature?

I would imagine that we will be putting a lot effort into the party ahead, which means that there will be any amount to help with. We hope that the party formation leads to the now easier to incorporate a lot of people who previously had difficulty integrating into the organization. You are not supposed to deny that much of our extra-parliamentary activities previously mainly suited men aged 18-30, and that many others have had difficulty finding a place with us. There is hopefully now remedied. It will shortly be published some articles on North Front just all about how you can help.

Many are curious as to how the proposal for merger with Swedes party that offered you looked. Is there anything you want to comment?


The details of my message to the SVP party leader Stefan Jacobsson and his response is to be considered confidential. So it should also remain well until we both agree that it can be published. What I currently feel that I can mention is that it is primarily contained a number of arguments and proposals. It contained no "requirement" as some have alleged, but instead "thoughts" on my part where I, without specifying which, also wrote that some of these were negotiable and others are not. Jacob's response was polite, eloquent and explained their attitude. It contained, however, no one from their side as expected.
 
Old December 8th, 2014 #67
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,902
Robbie Key
Default

Interview with leading member of NMR:

http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...on-12-3-14.mp3

To download, right-click(?) and click "Save as...".
 
Old February 21st, 2015 #68
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,902
Robbie Key
Default

Nordic Resistance Movement covered and participated at the Lukov March in Sofia, Bulgaria. It's an annual gathering to celebrate the memory of Major Lukov. According to reports the media was surprisingly friendly and interviewed the nationalists gathered without any particular hostility like in the West.

Quote:
He was a commander of the Army School of Artillery, of the Training Section of the General Staff's Artillery Inspection, of 2nd, 3rd Infantry divisions and Minister of War. During the Second World War he was a supporter of the Axis powers, particularly Nazi Germany. Abroad he is incorrectly thought to be the commander of the 13th Infantry division during World War I. In fact that was major-general Hristo Tsonev Lukov, a native of Gabrovo. Hristo Nikolov Lukov was promoted during World War I to the rank of a major and a commander of an artillery battalion.

Due to his close relations with the Third Reich[1][2][3] and his activities as leader of UBNL, Lukov is considered also as a promoter of antisemitic ideas.[4] In the 21st century the neo-nazi Bulgarian National Union is hosting the annual so-called Lukov March in Sofia since 2003 to commemorate "fallen heroes of Bulgaria".
Hristo_Lukov Hristo_Lukov


Last edited by Robbie Key; February 21st, 2015 at 10:26 AM.
 
Old February 21st, 2015 #69
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,902
Robbie Key
Default

Oh forgot to mention, they've also managed to get 1 500 signatures which is required in Sweden to be able to create a party and protect the party name from being used by others. So there's practically an outspoken National Socialist party in Sweden now!

More details soon, I hope.
 
Old February 21st, 2015 #70
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,902
Robbie Key
Default

The Nordic Resistance Movement is also very meticulous in 'keeping it real' so to speak. They regularly hold events for the members to do some real life exercise. Here's when they wandered a really long distance in Northern Sweden, through the wilderness and even slept in a tent in ice cold Sweden! A former military led the exercises and teached them about different methods of survival.







Exercise. They dragged the car 4.6 miles!:





Another exercise:





The tent:





 
Old February 21st, 2015 #71
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

I've been following the Nordic Resistance Movement for a while and believe they are one of the most promising political developments in all of Europe.

They have just the right amount of balance between militancy and intelligence. Their ideology is spot on (anti-Jew, anti-capitalist, anti-liberal without apologies) and they emphasize direct action on the street, but are reasonable about it (bend the rules as far as possible without breaking them if possible). I always have said that they should combine as the street attache of Party of the Swedes (which is more electorally integrated) since their ideology is similar enough.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old March 19th, 2015 #72
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,902
Robbie Key
Default

They've just started producing a podcast which is good. A podcast is an easy way of getting your message out. They have been discussing the question of Russia and Putin some. Their leader, Klas Lund, did express a, in my opinion, very balanced view of the situation. While Putin and his government may be cracking down on some nationalists in Russia, which is bad, you have to consider the larger picture. Is there someone more capable than Putin now? Would it necessarily become better if he was ousted? Not so, probably. He also put forward the view that Putin is the leader of a multi-ethnic empire. So in that sense it makes sense that he'd (like Front National, Jobbik, perhaps Golden Dawn) support nationalists in foreign, non-friendly countries but not necessarily within Russia. What would Russia and Putin gain today by raising ethnic conflicts within his own country?

Last edited by Robbie Key; March 20th, 2015 at 08:32 AM. Reason: spelling
 
Old March 19th, 2015 #73
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,865
Serbian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
They've just started producing a podcast which is good. A podcast is an easy way of getting your message out. They have been discussing the question of Russia and Putin some. Their leader, Klas Lund, did express a, in my opinion, very balanced view of the situation. While Putin and his government may be cracking down on some nationalists in Russia, which is bad, you have to consider the larger picture. Is there someone more capable than Putin now? Would it necessarily become better if he was ousted? Not so, probably. He also put forward the view that Putin is the leader of a multi-ethnic empire. So in that sense it makes sense that'd he'd (like Front National, Jobbik, perhaps Golden Dawn) support nationalists in foreign, non-friendly countries but not necessarily within Russia. What would Russia and Putin gain today by raising ethnic conflicts within his own country?

It is very unfortunate for me as a WN to say this but stoking ethnic tensions in Russia at this very delicate moment would only benefit ZOG. And the thing is that it would not bring about a white and free Russia, it would only cause chaos in the short term, and total Jewish occupation of Russia in the long run. This would then have a negative domino effect on resistance countries like Iran and Syria (with flow on effect to Hezbollah) which would have no ally in Moscow anymore.

Seeing jews like Kasparov and Khodorkovsky flirting with certain sections within Russian WN is very disturbing but in the scheme of things not surprising as the jews need street muscle for their toppling Putin plan. If they can repeat the Belgrade and Kiev street scenarios in Moscow (using nationalists as the spear) they will rejoice.
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old March 19th, 2015 #74
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
They've just started producing a podcast which is good. A podcast is an easy way of getting your message out. They have been discussing the question of Russia and Putin some. Their leader, Klas Lund, did express a, in my opinion, very balanced view of the situation. While Putin and his government may be cracking down on some nationalists in Russia, which is bad, you have to consider the larger picture. Is there someone more capable than Putin now? Would it necessarily become better if he was ousted? Not so, probably. He also put forward the view that Putin is the leader of a multi-ethnic empire. So in that sense it makes sense that'd he'd (like Front National, Jobbik, perhaps Golden Dawn) support nationalists in foreign, non-friendly countries but not necessarily within Russia. What would Russia and Putin gain today by raising ethnic conflicts within his own country?
Not everyone waving Nazi flags is your friend, and that goes 10 times more for parts of Eastern Europe where NATO and global Jewry has been revealed as a benefactor for certain "Nazi" groups with the aim of stirring Russophobia. Globalist kike pawn Woodrow Wilson and Vladimir Lenin did the same shit in Europe during their day.

In fact, I would argue Putin's "anti-Nazi" legislation is motivated more by fears of paramilitary groups with "racist" facades being used to overthrow him and place Jews into power like happened in the Ukraine. Hardly surprising that the most stringent laws against racialist organizing and "holocaust denial" happened after Washington, Brussels, and Tel Avivs coup d'etat in Ukraine.

The governments of Poland, Brazil, and Austria were modeled around Italian Fascist or NS principles on the surface prior to and during WWII, but deep down they were fronts and proxies for the Judeo-Anglo Saxon powers.

Our way of organizing is far more powerful, radical and efficient than anything the Left has to offer, so the Jews will use this in cases where it benefits them geopolitically and they retain full control. The same goes for Islamism, ie the rebels in Libya, Iraq, and Syria and ISIS. You don't see Hezbollah joining forces with ISIS just because they happen to be Muslim.

There are White Nationalists who know the score with Putin that critically support him, and they are left unmolested by the state. It's often (but granted, not always) the ones who start thinking of taking money from sketchy "foreigners" or side with the Jewish billionaire funded Azov that get thrown in prison.

Putin's vision vindicates the Red Army during WWII, and he won't let anyone get in the way of that. Approach that as you may. He's not a white nationalist by any definition, but that sure as fuck doesn't make Jews and America the good guys (and yes, you DO have to pick one in the Ukraine and Russia).
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona

Last edited by Joe_Smith; March 19th, 2015 at 10:18 PM.
 
Old March 31st, 2015 #75
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,865
Serbian
Default

Representative from the Nordic Resistance Movement at the International Conservative Forum in St. Petersburg Russia






Inte bara politiker deltog på konferensen, även soldater från den pro-ryska separatistsidan var på plats.

https://www.nordfront.se/internation...tive-forum.smr
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en

Last edited by Serbian; March 31st, 2015 at 10:02 PM.
 
Old March 31st, 2015 #76
Joe_Smith
Senior Member
 
Joe_Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
Joe_Smith
Default

Wow, I had no idea that the SRM went. This is a big deal for them, it means that the nationalists of the world are noticing them and looking to bring them to the table. I'm willing to bet Putin is disappointed with Front National and other Kosher conservatives, he rightly sees them as opportunists that will betray him for world Jewry.

The Anglo psychology is so superficial, it's amusing. A lot of the people from Britain especially who support the kosher Nazis in Ukraine complain that Russia is "anti-Fascist" because of something Putin said regarding the Ukraine, LOL. Now they're saying "Conservative conference? Then where's Nigel Farage!!".

All the people involved in this delegation knew exactly the definition of "Conservative" means in Russia, judging from the party organizer. "Neo-Nazis? What do you mean, we are Russki conservative!" The odd man out appears to be WASPy Jared Taylor, who probably thought from the invite that he would meet his heroes Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders, but instead found himself in a room of people asking him what he thinks of the Jewish power. Maybe this whore can work out a financing deal with the Kremlin and finally stop sucking Jew dick for donations.


The Russians are definitely looking to give the "social-democratic" models of the European Union like Sweden a "Maidan" of their own, regardless of what the Kremlin says. This is getting interesting.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'"
― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona
 
Old May 1st, 2015 #77
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,902
Robbie Key
Default

Radio Nordfront interviews the leader of the Finnish Resistance Movement in English:

 
Old May 6th, 2015 #78
Bobby Bandanza
The anti-Jew.
 
Bobby Bandanza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,539
Bobby Bandanza
jewsign Giant National Socialist Banner raised in Stockholm – Jews cry about so-called “Holocaust”


http://crushzion.k0nsl.org/giant-nat...led-holocaust/
__________________
http://macseafraidh.wordpress.com/

"Whatcha gonna do when Trumpamania and the largest rats of Judea Jew wild on you?!" - Me
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.
Page generated in 0.18402 seconds.