|
November 9th, 2010 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Ideas for Europe
The European nations should define themselves genetically. Each nation should draft a genetic "definition" (set of standards) of what it means to be that particular nationality. Citizens who came into the country after WWII and do not meet the definition would be prohibited from breeding, although they would be free to have children via adoption or using egg/sperm donors from their host nation.
Citizens who do not fall under the definition but whose ancestors lived in the nation prior to WWII (i.e. Jews, Gypsies, and, e.g. genetic Germans who are Russians) should be grandfathered in, but can only breed with others of their particular genetic affiliation. Also, each European country should have a Law of Return, meaning they will grant automatic citizenship to anyone who is genetically a national.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
November 9th, 2010 | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,752
|
Not a bad idea.
This is of course after a continent-wide revolution? |
November 10th, 2010 | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,290
|
Quote:
|
|
November 10th, 2010 | #4 |
Barbarian
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,307
|
Would it be okay if northern European nations put "blue eyes" as an important defining characteristic? Predictions are that blue eyes throughout the world will be extinct in a century. But those with brown eyes are very fast to make out it is evil to suggest blue eyes as an ethnic feature. Once this eye colour was by far the majority in Europe, especially northern Europe. Now there are even WNs who deny the balance was ever any different than it is right now.
|
November 10th, 2010 | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,290
|
Hilda, I strongly agree with you. It used to be more than half in the US who had play eyes. Now it is only 1 in 6. I don't know if this also includes non-whites, but still, the blue eye is losing ground quickly, and I will offer my support. The same goes for other White features, but I don't want to make it out as though I am a Nordicist.
|
November 10th, 2010 | #6 | |
baппed
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A:\
Posts: 3,367
|
Quote:
*sigh* ...I think you're overlooking the very reason WHY we're even reduced to HAVING this conversation. |
|
November 10th, 2010 | #7 | |
Barbarian
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
|
|
November 10th, 2010 | #8 |
The paranormal silent type
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 8,265
|
Cheap Geek immitation. The original Buddy Holly vids are censored out for Germany
__________________
|
November 10th, 2010 | #9 |
Death Camp of Tolerance
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Europa
Posts: 539
|
Thats bullshit faggy..
You can diferentiate whites by their sub-racial type, not by to some degree artificial, concept of nationality. That said, most White nations consist of more than one significant sub-racial type.. |
November 10th, 2010 | #10 |
The paranormal silent type
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 8,265
|
Adoption is also mentioned, here. Hmmmmmm
__________________
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|