Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > This Just In
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old March 14th, 2019 #101
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Captain Marvel: The New Politically Correct Superhero Fighting for “Intersectional Feminism”


Throughout the years masked crime fighters have faced some pretty scary enemies, though Marvel and the stars of the studio’s latest blockbuster (maybe — time will tell) Captain Marvel, may have outdone themselves in presenting an even more terrifying uber-baddie. In 2019, enter civilization’s greatest foe … sexism. According to an Entertainment Weekly article, “Intergalactic odd couple Brie Larson and Samuel L. Jackson return to 1995 to fight aliens,” and “Sexism.”

A joke? You wish. Marvel has officially stepped into the realm of PC politics, marketing its new Marvel entry as an opportunity to get in on 2019’s spirit of “intersectional feminism.” Of course, the film is Marvel’s first ever solo-female superhero so it’s a great opportunity for the studio and its media friends to jabber on about how much of a watershed moment it is.

EW’s interview with the actress behind Captain Marvel demonstrated how quickly the movie studio wants to flow down into the PC sewer.

Interviewer Devin Goggan got into the female-centric gaze of the movie, tiptoeing lightly with a soft question about the movie’s themes of female friendship. He asked, “This film is Carol Danvers’ [Captain Marvel] story, but it’s also a story about female friendship… What was it about that theme you wanted to explore?”

Larson moved into full “woke” mode with her answer. The actress started off with the classic, it’s 2019, man. The future is female. She stated, “What 2019 is about really, is intersectional feminism. There’s just no question that we would have to show what it means to be all different kinds of women, that we don’t have just one type.” Yeah these narcissistic Hollywood types really believe we were born yesterday, and that we’ve never seen tough women heroes before. I vaguely remember Ellen Ripley from Aliens, but I must be mistaken.
https://www.lifenews.com/2019/03/05/...onal-feminism/
 
Old March 16th, 2019 #102
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
More about Brie Larson's butt double:


From the comment section:

Quote:
A personality double would be more useful lol
Quote:
Can she get a face double....?
Quote:
Can she get an acting double?
Quote:
Brie Larson's butt isn't just flat, it's concave. Look at the wrinkles in her costume! It really is a sad day in the MCU when Spiderman has a more shapely derriere than Captain Marvel. Hmm... maybe they should hire Tom Holland to be her butt double. After all, they already have him under contract.
Quote:
When you hire someone who has the same acting ability as a wooden board are you surprised she looks like a board?
Quote:
So professional trainers and CGI couldn't cut it, they just needed better material in the end. So shouldn't this raise a red flag that maybe you didn't cast the right person, ignoring all the other red flags. Just a thought.
 
Old March 17th, 2019 #103
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
More about Brie Larson's butt double:

Quote:
Marvel Is Seeking A Butt Double For One Of The Avengers


(...) *Sigh* butt but there is a more likely explanation and it starts with this side-by-side comparison shot that launched a thousand memes. In it, we see Tom Holland in his tighter-than-average Spider-Man suit on one side, compared to Brie Larson dressed as Captain Marvel from her movie and… well, she’s no Scarlett Johansson. (Or Tom Holland for that matter.)
(...)

(...)

(...)
If I had to put money on it, I’d say that someone at Marvel decided that Larson just wasn’t Marvel-ous enough in one area, so for some close-up shots, they wanted someone who could… um stand in for her.

Well, we’ll see when ‘Captain Marvel’ arrives on March 8, 2019, followed by ‘Avengers 4’ on May 3, 2019.
https://sciencefiction.com/2018/08/1...-one-avengers/



 
Old March 18th, 2019 #104
steven clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,277
Default Andrew Anglin demolishes Hymiewood's latest jew feminist movie "Captain Marvel" a.k.a. "Captain Flat Ass"

I recall John Podhoretz writing about Wonder Woman when it came out:
'In bygone days...the movie would be treated as it deserves to be treated-as a very watchable piece of junk. Wonder Woman is well-paced, well-done, and well acted by its two ultraglam movie-star leads...Like all good superhero movies, Wonder Woman is best when it is funny and it's worst when two supernatural beings are hurling jeeps at each other's indestructible magic bodies because they've evidently forgotten you can't kill an immortal with a car.

But you see, we live in a time when our chattering classes have collectively decided it is their sacred duty to suck the life and fun and joy out of just about everything in the name of a greater ideological purpose...Wonder Woman must be treated...as a treatise on the place and role and status of women-and be judged on how it fares in the transmission of an appropriate message.'

So it is with Captain Marvel. All the talk of women's issues, gender roles...but you understand Hollywood sees pop as intellect. Movies like the above would be considered B or matinee fare years ago, but the A movie has disappeared to the art theaters or places like Sundance (and the BBC can crank them out), but now the B movie is that standard. It's not that superhero movies are in integral part of Hollywood's product...it IS the product...that and the usual caper film or crime film.

As Podhoretz said:
'Wonder Woman is a 150 million dollar production whose purpose is not to convey messages about feminism or abortion or the horrors of war. Its purpose is to earn a billion dollars and set up the next billion-dollar comic-book movie in its "universe."

Same with Captain Marvel and the rest. If there are a lot of feminist loons who see 'meaning' in Captain Marvel...well, it doesn't say much about women's higher thoughts, does it? But, judging by the posts here, I don't take women who dye their hair pink very seriously anyway.

It's funny how the more 'profound' many so called enlightened women think themselves to be, the nuttier and loonier they became as they espouse so much drivel, and I don't include all women, nor our distinguished women posters here on VNN.

It's noteworthy how comics have taken over so much literary life. When I was in a Shakespeare play some years ago, many of the younger actors spent much of their time backstage downloading comics on their laptops, and that seemed to be all they cared about, and these are 'actors', who are kind of airheads anyway. But we became an airhead culture a long time ago.
 
Old March 18th, 2019 #105
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Hollywood's 'Captain Marvel' blockbuster is the latest US military propaganda push


(...) The Pentagon was deeply involved in the production of the hit Hollywood film Captain Marvel, and is using the movie to spread recruitment propaganda.

The superhero blockbuster Captain Marvel is a perfect case study for how the United States military uses Hollywood to spread propaganda.

The US military is at the center of the plot of Captain Marvel. The film's protagonist, Carol Danvers, is a former US Air Force pilot who becomes a superhero after absorbing the powers of an advanced technology created by another US military scientist. (That scientist happens to be a member of the advanced alien race known as the Kree, who for unexplained reasons decided to do groundbreaking military research for, of all the myriad places in the universe, the US of A).

As soon as the film opens, it bombards viewers with two hours of non-stop US military propaganda. And it is not even subtle; at the plot's climax, Captain Marvel changes the colors of her suit to match those of the American flag.

But the US military is not only part of the story of Captain Marvel; as The Grayzone details below, the Pentagon was deeply involved in the production of the film itself.

The cast and directors of Captain Marvel worked closely with the United States military, relying on US military officers as consultants and advisers, employing dozens of active-duty US soldiers as extras. Several scenes were shot on a US military base. And since its release, the US Department of Defense has promoted the film relentlessly on its website and social media accounts.
(...)
Captain Marvel was marketed as a feminist blockbuster, a rare superhero movie featuring a female lead. As the women-centered magazine Elle trumpeted, "Captain Marvel Is Now the Highest Grossing Movie With a Female Lead Ever."

As is so often the case in Hollywood, however, ostensibly progressive breakthroughs in cultural representation were seamlessly blended with US militarist propaganda.

(...)
Investigative journalists and academics have documented the intimate relationship between Hollywood, the military, and intelligence agencies. Relying on declassified FOIA documents, researchers Tom Secker and Matthew Alford revealed that the DoD, CIA, and NSA have influenced more than 1800 movies and TV shows, and had even prevented films deemed too critical of the Pentagon from being made.
https://www.sott.net/article/409292-...ropaganda-push
 
Old March 18th, 2019 #106
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
From the article in my previous post:

Quote:
Captain Marvel was marketed as a feminist blockbuster, a rare superhero movie featuring a female lead. As the women-centered magazine Elle trumpeted, "Captain Marvel Is Now the Highest Grossing Movie With a Female Lead Ever."

As is so often the case in Hollywood, however, ostensibly progressive breakthroughs in cultural representation were seamlessly blended with US militarist propaganda.
(...)
Investigative journalists and academics have documented the intimate relationship between Hollywood, the military, and intelligence agencies.
Another example of this is the talentless artist Katy Perry's crap song Part of Me, which glorifies female US soldiers fighting zionist wars to secure the hegemony of the genocidal bandit state of Pissrael in the Middle East.









 
Old March 18th, 2019 #107
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

how is this movie grossing so big, i thought it was terrible
 
Old March 18th, 2019 #108
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
how is this movie grossing so big, i thought it was terrible
The crappy, jew-created Marvel movie Fantastic Four from 2015, in which the blonde white superhero Johnny Storm a.k.a. The Human Torch was played by a negro, bombed:

Quote:
The film received generally unfavorable reviews by the time of its release, with criticisms aimed at its direction, screenplay, humor, gloomy tone, unfaithfulness to its source material, visual effects, choppy editing, lack of dynamic between the main characters, and pacing (...) At the 36th Golden Raspberry Awards, it won in the categories for Worst Director, Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel and Worst Picture (the latter tied with Fifty Shades of Grey) and was also nominated for Worst Screen Combo and Worst Screenplay.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantas...ur_(2015_film)

I was hoping that the same thing would happen to Captain Flat Ass a.k.a. Captain Foot Fungus, but I guess the jews' enormous influence in the media and entertainment industry was able to turn this anti-white shitbomb into a hit. According to the following article, the jews resorted to skullduggery to achieve their goal:

Quote:
Disney Confirmed To Have Manipulated Captain Marvel Perception




As has been suspected for weeks, it is now confirmed that Disney and other companies have intentionally manipulated the online perception surrounding Captain Marvel.

A report by USA Today confirms two Disney studio executives said that "they've become more adept and prepared for combating organized negativity around a release."

The report mentions that videos posted to YouTube that weren't favorable about Captain Marvel or its star Brie Larson were pushed down.

It's further mentioned that Rotten Tomatoes removed the "Want To See" score from its site, but the article stops short of blaming Captain Marvel (which, of course, is the reason). Rotten Tomatoes also restarted its "Audience Score" following the flick's release, which appears to be in order to inflate the positive numbers. The president of Fandango is a former Disney executive.



It also recently became known that a movie reviewer for NBC Universal's SYFY site lied about doing reviews stating they had to spin things positively or else they wouldn't get access to exclusives, which included early access to movies and celebrity interviews.

Deadline has also been inflating box office numbers for Captain Marvel in every one of their articles.

It is also thought that Disney may be falsely reporting Captain Marvel box office numbers, as numerous users on social media have posted pictures of empty movie theaters. Another possibility is that Disney could be buying up all the empty seats themselves to falsely inflate ticket sales.
https://cosmicbook.news/disney-manip...vel-perception

Some of this jewish skullduggery is also confirmed in The New York Times:

Quote:
When ‘Captain Marvel’ Became a Target, the Rules Changed


(...) weeks ahead of “Captain Marvel’s” release, the percentage of Rotten Tomatoes users who registered that they wanted to see it plummeted to 27 percent. On Feb. 25, Rotten Tomatoes implemented the changes, and the “want to see” score disappeared. Since the film’s nationwide release on Friday, the audience score has rebounded to a better-but-still-not-great 63 percent, the lowest for any movie in the Marvel franchise.
(...)
The film’s opponents also swarmed YouTube; video rants with titles like “Brie Larson is Ruining Marvel” often appeared at the top of searches for her name. But a day before the film’s release, a change in the search results pushed those videos beneath others from established sources like Jimmy Kimmel, “Today” and Wired.
(...)
The new Marvel movie is not the first film to come under attack for a perceived feminist or politically correct underpinning. The all-female remake of “Ghostbusters,” “Black Panther” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi,” which had a diverse cast, all found themselves in the cross hairs of armchair critics, some aligned with alt-right groups.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/13/m...-tomatoes.html
 
Old March 19th, 2019 #109
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
The sick feminists who liked Captain Flat Ass a.k.a. Captain Foot Fungus are upset that the producers of her next movie, The Avengers: Endgame, want her to look (somewhat) feminine:

Quote:
Captain Marvel Brie Larson Fans Hating on Avengers: Endgame


It's another day, it's another Captain Marvel controversy, as this time some fans are complaining about the new The Avengers: Endgame trailer and the fact that it sports Brie Larson wearing lipstick.

Social media users have pointed out that in the new The Avengers: Endgame trailer, Captain Marvel is seen wearing lipstick, but Carol Danvers apparently doesn't wear any makeup in the Captain Marvel movie.

"Why has Captain Marvel / Carol got red lipstick on in the Endgame trailer??" Twitter user rubynaldrett tweeted and then deleted. "In Captain Marvel, she shows no interest in makeup so why has she got the lippy and hair straighteners out to fight this war?? The difference between the male and female directors is showing."

Another Twitter user also blames directors Joe and Anthony Russo with other Twitter users joining in on the conversation.

"I am actively angry about how the Russo brothers have Carol styled for Endgame. Why would Captain Marvel suddenly start doing full glam makeup after she's been rocking a minimalist look and then spent even more years in space?" kaytaylorrea said in a tweet and then deleted.
https://cosmicbook.news/captain-marv...engers-endgame

As you can see, Andrew Anglin was right in his article that I quoted in my OP.
 
Old March 20th, 2019 #110
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Marvel ‘wants gay actor for superhero role in The Eternals’


Marvel is reportedly working on a gay superhero character for a new film and wants a gay actor to play the part. The internet has already suggested its top picks.

The world of Marvel is reportedly set to get a gay superhero.

That Hashtag Show reports that Marvel is on the hunt for an actor to play the lead role in their 2020 feature film The Eternals.
https://www.news.com.au/entertainmen...2e697b644c20bb

Jews jewing jewily.
 
Old March 20th, 2019 #111
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
how is this movie grossing so big, i thought it was terrible
Haven't kwans always been suckers for jewish garbage?
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old March 21st, 2019 #112
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Haven't kwans always been suckers for jewish garbage?
I think that people are starting to wake up, I think they're fed up with the SJW jew crap. The lousy Marvel movie Fantastic Four from 2015, in which the blonde white man Johnny Storm was played by a negro, was a box office failure, just like the feminist version of Ghostbusters. And there are other examples.
 
Old March 23rd, 2019 #113
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
Proud SJW feminist Brie Larson needs a butt double in her movies because people don't like her flat ass.
 
Old April 3rd, 2019 #114
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Brie Larson and Netflix Bully Fan Over Bad 'Unicorn Store' Movie


With the release of Captain Marvel, both Netflix and Brie Larson attack and bully a fan on social media in regards to the bad Unicorn Store movie that will get released this month on the streaming network.

Unicorn Store was actually directed by Brie Larson and also starred Samuel L. Jackson, but it's not any good and has a 3.9 star rating on IMDb and only a 68% Rotten Tomatoes score. Obviously, Netflix and Larson are trying to capitalize on the release of Captain Marvel by putting the 2017 Unicorn Store movie on the streaming network, but when a fan on Twitter stated he didn't like it, Netflix and Larson had their large social media following and shill websites gang up on the lone Twitter user, of course calling him a troll.
https://cosmicbook.news/brie-larson-...-unicorn-store

Quote:
Unicorn Store is a 2017 comedy film directed and co-produced by Brie Larson (in her feature directorial debut) from a screenplay by Samantha McIntyre. It stars Larson, Samuel L. Jackson, Joan Cusack, Bradley Whitford, Karan Soni, Mamoudou Athie, Mary Holland, and Hamish Linklater.

It screened in the Special Presentations section at the 2017 Toronto International Film Festival. It is scheduled to be released on April 5, 2019, by Netflix.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn_Store
 
Old July 21st, 2019 #115
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
Now they're saying that Natalie Portman, a female jew, is going to play Thor, the Nordic god of thunder, in an upcoming Marvel movie:

Quote:
Natalie Portman announced as female Thor in upcoming Marvel movie


July 21, 2019 10:01 am

(JTA) — Actress Natalie Portman will go from super scientist-love interest to super hero in the 4th installment of Marvel’s “Thor” series.

Portman, who is Jewish and Israeli, will portray a female Thor in “Thor: Love and Thunder,” scheduled for release in November 2021, Deadline Hollywood reported from the annual Comic-Con convention in San Diego.

It will be the 28th installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The film and Portman’s participation were announced on Saturday during Marvel’s Comic-con panel.
https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/nata...g-marvel-movie
 
Old August 12th, 2019 #116
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
Batwoman is DC, not Marvel, but I'm still posting it here since this thread is about how jews use comic books to push for degeneracy, like homosexuality and race-mixing:

Quote:
Ruby Rose Cast As CW’s Queer, Jewish Batwoman


August 7, 2018

The CW has crowned its newest Batwoman: model-actor Ruby Rose will take up the queer, Jewish mantle.

Entertainment Weekly reports that Rose will make her first batty appearance in December, for an annual DC crossover event. A full-fledged “Batwoman” series is also currently in development. If the show is picked up, Rose will fly onto small screens at some point in 2019 for the first-ever TV series focusing on an LGBTQ superhero.

The show itself will be a bonanza of LGBTQ representation: Rose identifies as gay and gender-fluid. The Batwoman she’s portraying was reintroduced by DC in 2006 as an out Jewish lesbian. “Vampire Diaries” creator Caroline Dries, who will write and executive produce “Batwoman,” is gay. The promotional material for the “Batwoman” debut emphasizes the character’s sexuality — not a given, considering the straight-wash of other Hollywood productions, like the upcoming Freddy Mercury biopic.
https://forward.com/schmooze/407650/...wish-batwoman/

Quote:
Batwoman is vengeance, she is the night and she’s Jewish


The website Comicbook quoted Dries as saying, "Kate Kane is a Jewish woman.” But Dries insisted that it is “not a huge thing” for the character, who is also an out-of-the-closet lesbian.

By Hannah Brown August 7, 2019

(...) While neither Batman nor Robin ever made much of an issue of religion, Batwoman has a strong Jewish identity and celebrated Hanukah with her significant other before the pair shared a kiss in the comics.
https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Batwo...-Jewish-597735
 
Old August 12th, 2019 #117
Gladiatrix
Senior Member
 
Gladiatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In a dystopian nightmare
Posts: 4,808
Default Tom Holland wants a gay Spider-Man and more diverse Marvel heroes because “the world isn’t as simple as a straight white guy”

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
More about Brie Larson's butt double:


https://sciencefiction.com/2018/08/1...-one-avengers/



All you need to know about Tom Holland. I have never heard of either of these people. He did set off my gaydar.

"Spider-Man actor Tom Holland is throwing his support behind a gay version of the web-slinging superhero.

Speaking to Britain’s The Sunday Times, the Spider-Man: Far From Home star said that the Marvel Cinematic Universe needed to show that “the world isn’t as simple as a straight white guy.”

Asked by the Times if he would be okay with Peter Parker/Spider-Man being gay, Holland said, “Yeah, of course.”

“I can’t talk about the future of the character because honestly I don’t know and it’s out of my hands,” Holland continued. “But I do know a lot about the future of Marvel, and they are going to be representing lots of different people in the next few years.”

He added: “The world isn’t as simple as a straight white guy. It doesn’t end there, and these films need to represent more than one type of person.”

https://www.metroweekly.com/2019/07/...ght-white-guy/
__________________
Political correctness is oppression disguised as good manners.
 
Old August 14th, 2019 #118
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gladiatrix View Post
All you need to know about Tom Holland. I have never heard of either of these people. He did set off my gaydar.

"Spider-Man actor Tom Holland is throwing his support behind a gay version of the web-slinging superhero.

Speaking to Britain’s The Sunday Times, the Spider-Man: Far From Home star said that the Marvel Cinematic Universe needed to show that “the world isn’t as simple as a straight white guy.”

Asked by the Times if he would be okay with Peter Parker/Spider-Man being gay, Holland said, “Yeah, of course.”

“I can’t talk about the future of the character because honestly I don’t know and it’s out of my hands,” Holland continued. “But I do know a lot about the future of Marvel, and they are going to be representing lots of different people in the next few years.”

He added: “The world isn’t as simple as a straight white guy. It doesn’t end there, and these films need to represent more than one type of person.”

https://www.metroweekly.com/2019/07/...ght-white-guy/
Well, Tom Holland is a Hymiewood whore, so he knows what his jewish masters want from him.

Thanks for yet another good post, Gladiatrix. (I'm sorry that somebody gave you a thumbs down for it. I guess some posters don't like when you criticize faggotry.)
 
Old August 15th, 2019 #119
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

.
Here's yet another article about how the jews are using Marvel comics to spread feminist propaganda:

Quote:
‘White, male and brawny feels tired’: is this the age of feminist Marvel movies?


The idea of a female Thor and a bisexual Valkyrie have the Marvel fanboys in a state … but the franchise is just reflecting the way the world is

Captain Marvel may have ruled the box office this spring, but Avengers: Endgame was still Iron Man and Captain America’s show. So when female fans woke up last Sunday to the news of a female Thor, a Black Widow movie and a bisexual Valkyrie, some wondered if they were still dreaming. The announcements at San Diego Comic-Con about Phase 4 of Disney’s Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) appeared to promise a more gender-balanced future.

The most prominent was that Natalie Portman’s Dr Jane Foster would take the hammer from Chris Hemsworth’s Thor, becoming Mighty Thor. Social media exploded and divided, with fanboys declaring that Marvel had gone “feminist”. There was an easy comeback: the Thor story is based on an existing comic book plotline in which Foster temporarily acquires Thor’s powers. But the decision to use that specific story still speaks volumes. It is far less well known than the Captain Marvel series and could easily have been overlooked in favour of another story with Hemsworth front and centre, keeping Portman’s character as the astrophysicist love-interest (or out of the picture entirely, which was the case in 2017’s Thor: Ragnarok).

This shows Marvel’s commitment to showing diversity and opening the universe out to all the iterations of the characters we’ve seen in the comic books,”
https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...-marvel-movies
 
Old August 18th, 2019 #120
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
Here's yet another article about how the jews are using Marvel comics to spread feminist propaganda:


https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...-marvel-movies
Another quote from the above article:

Quote:
There may be pressure from within the MCU cast to give female actors bigger roles. A scene in Avengers: Endgame, in which the women rose up together, felt well-intentioned, but clumsy. Was it a hasty response to requests from the Valkyrie actor Tessa Thompson to be cast directly alongside her female colleagues? A more elegant scene in Endgame appointed Valkyrie as ruler of Asgard. It was a stirring sight to see Thor, a white male born into privilege, graciously handing the baton to Valkyrie, a born leader from an underrepresented group. Now it has been confirmed that Thompson’s character in Thor: Love and Thunder will honour the comic book character’s bisexuality, too. Thompson, who is bisexual, is also a vocal supporter of the Time’s Up movement, spearheading the “4% challenge” by committing to announce a female-directed project within the next 18 months.
Could the jews' anti-white agenda get any more obvious?
 
Reply

Tags
brie larson, captain flat ass, captain foot fungus, captain marvel, jews

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.
Page generated in 0.36302 seconds.