Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 12th, 2008 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default Australian Aborigines

Australia's Aborigines: A Timeline

Published: February 12, 2008

A timeline of key dates and facts about Australia's Aborigines:

_ 1788 — British settlers establish a penal colony in Sydney, leading to skirmishes between the colonialists and local Aboriginal clans. Aborigines are believed to have numbered about 750,000 at the time of settlement and to have inhabited Australia for up to 70,000 years.

_ 1789 — The first cases of smallpox, brought by the settlers, are reported among Aborigines and kill hundreds.

_ 1791 — Officials grant parcels of land around Sydney to convicts who have served their time, beginning years of dispossession of Aborigines that continues as white settlers disperse throughout Australia. Clashes between Aborigines and settlers lead to tens of thousands of deaths among Aborigines and hundreds of settler deaths.

_ Jan. 1, 1901 — The Commonwealth of Australia is formed, but the constitution excludes Aborigines from the national census, leaving them to be considered "fauna."

_ 1910 — State governments introduce policies to remove mixed-blood Aboriginal children from their families, arguing the children would be better off because the race — now estimated at around 60,000 nationally — was doomed to extinction.

_ 1937 — Assimilation of mixed-blood Aborigines — by force if necessary — is adopted as official policy at a meeting of federal and state officials, while Aborigines living a "tribal life" are to stay on reserves.

_ 1967 — In a landmark referendum, Australians vote overwhelmingly in favor of changing the constitution to count Aborigines in the census, effectively granting them voting rights and ending constitutional discrimination.

_ 1970 — The last laws granting authorities wide powers to take Aboriginal children away from their families are abolished, though many Aborigines say statistics show the government is still more likely to take Aboriginal children into foster care than white children for reasons such as abuse.

_1976 — The federal government passes legislation granting Aboriginal ownership to large parts of the Northern Territory, kicking off a new movement to reclaim traditional lands.

_1992 — The highest court rules that Aborigines held a form of ownership to Australia before the settlers arrived, a landmark decision that results in legislative recognition of native title rights over some government-owned lands_ and years of acrimonious debate about the issue.

_1997 — A national inquiry says policies removing Aboriginal children from their parents caused massive trauma to 100,000 children and their families, and recommends the "stolen generation" be compensated. Prime Minister John Howard refuses an official apology, but hundreds of thousands of Australians attend so-called "Sorry Day" events.

_ 2007 — Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is elected, and promises a formal apology to those Aborigines taken from their families on behalf of the government. The apology is due in Parliament on Wednesday.

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/...s-Timeline.php
 
Old February 12th, 2008 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

[Here's an email circulating in Australia in response to the government's official apology to abos (2/13/08). It contains many facts about human subsidies given aborigines.]

AUSTRALIAN APOLOGY TO THE ABORIGINAL POPULATION

We apologise for giving you doctors and free medical care, which allows you to survive and multiply so that you can demand apologies.

We apologise for helping you to read and teaching you the English language, thus opening up to you the entire European civilisation, thought and enterprise.

We feel that we must apologise for building hundreds of homes for you, which you have vandalised and destroyed.

We apologise for giving you law and order which has helped prevent you from slaughtering one another and using the unfortunate for food purposes.

We apologise for developing large farms and properties, which today feed you, where before, you had the benefits of living off the land and starving during droughts.

We apologise for providing you with warm clothing made of fabric to replace the animal skins you used before.

We apologise for building roads and railway tracks between cities and building cars so that you no longer have to walk over harsh terrain.

We apologise for paying off your vehicles when you fail to pay the instalments.

We apologise for giving you free travel anywhere, whenever.

We apologise for giving each and every member of your family $100.00 and free travel to attend an aboriginal funeral.

We apologise for not charging you rent on any lands when white people have to pay.

We apologise for giving you interest free loans.

We apologise for developing oil wells and minerals, including gold and diamonds which you never used and had no idea of their value.

We apologise for developing Ayers Rock and Kakadu, and handing them over to you so that you get all the money.

We apologise for allowing taxpayers money to be paid towards a daughters' wedding ($8,000.00 each daughter).

We apologise for giving you $1.7 billion per year for your 250,000 people, which is $48,000.00 per aboriginal man, woman and child.

We apologise for working hard to pay taxes that finance your welfare, medical care, education, etc to the tune of $1.2 billion each year.

We apologise for you having to approach the aboriginal affairs department to verify the above figures.

For the trouble you will have identifying the "uncle toms" in your own community who are getting richer and leaving some of you living in squalor and poverty. We do apologise.

We really do.

We are only too happy to take back all the above and return you to the paradise of the "outback", whenever you are ready.
 
Old February 12th, 2008 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default


Aboriginal crime in Australia


What is meant by the term, "Aboriginals are over-represented in jails"?

The journalists and PR experts working, at taxpayer expense, for the Aboriginal industry have created a number of terms best described as emotive propaganda. One such term is "Aboriginals are over-represented in jails"

You wouldn't think they would publicise such a fact. But the propaganda effect has turned a negative into a positive. The term has been picked up and used by the Aboriginal industry, judges and do-gooders to try and make us all feel guilty about jailing any Aboriginal, regardless of the crime.

There may be some validity to this term if Aboriginals received longer jail sentences than white offenders. But the reverse is the case. On average, Aboriginals receive 42% shorter jail terms than non-Aboriginals jailed for the same offence (read the article "Judges soft on Aboriginal criminals").

Why are Aboriginals "over-represented" in jails

Simply because they commit more crime. According to the University of WA crime research centre, while Aboriginals make up less than 3% of the population, they commit 20% of the violent crime in Western Australia.

The research centre also found that one in five assaults, one in three robberies, more than one in three homicides and about one in ten sexual offences are inter-racial. About 93% of those involve Aboriginal offenders and non-Aboriginal victims.

That is why Aboriginals are "over-represented" in the criminal justice system. No amount of posturing and emotional blackmail can change the facts.
The hidden victims of Aboriginal crime

While the judges and do-gooders protect Aboriginal criminals (mainly males) from justice, they help perpetuate violence against Aboriginal women and children

The judges and do-gooders should read the following statistics and then hang their heads in shame:

*

Up to 50 per cent of Aboriginal children are victims of family violence and child abuse

*

A survey carried out among 120 households in Adelaide found 90 per cent of the women and 84 per cent of the young girls had been raped at some stage of their lives.
*

In most States, more than 70 per cent of assaults on Aboriginal women are carried out by their husbands or boyfriends
*

Aboriginal women are 20 times more likely than non-Aboriginal women to be victims of violence

Source: The publication, Through Black Eyes, published by the Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care.

http://www.australian-news.com.au/aborepresent.htm
 
Old February 12th, 2008 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Judges soft on Aboriginal criminals

Judges sentence Aboriginals to 43% shorter jail terms than the rest of the population

If you are an Aboriginal felon then you can expect a jail term 42.8% shorter than a non- Aboriginal convicted for the same offence. The median aggregate sentence length for all offences for Aboriginals is 2 years, versus 3 years and 6 months for non-Aboriginals.

These startling figures, as shown in the table below, validate the public perception that judges are soft on Aboriginal criminals.


Scales of Injustice Offence (jail terms for non-Abo vs Abo)

Homicide 14 years 10 years
Assault 2 years 6 months 1 year 6 months
Sex offences 6 years 7 years
Other against person 3 years 3 months 3 years 3 months
Robbery 6 years 5 years 8 months
Break and enter 2 years 1 year 11 months
Fraud 1 year 8 months 2 years 6 months
Theft 1 year 1 year
Property damage 3 years 9 months
Justice procedures 9 months 9 months
Good order offences 4 months 14 months
Drug offences 4 years 6 months 2 years 3 months
Driving offences 6 months 7 months
Other traffic offences 6 months 8 months
Other offences 1 year 4 months 9 months

All Offences 3 years 6 months 2 years

http://www.australian-news.com.au/abosentence.htm
 
Old February 12th, 2008 #5
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

The general consensus among scholars for the arrival of humans in Australia is placed at 40,000 to 50,000 years ago with a possible range of up to 70,000 years ago though not as widely supported. The earliest human remains found to date are that of Mungo Man which have been dated at about 40,000 years old.

At the time of first European contact, it has been estimated the absolute minimum pre-1788 population was 315,000, while recent archaeological finds suggest that a population of 750,000 could have been sustained.[8]

[Population estimates of non-Whites are typically exaggerated by White-hating academics, in order to magnify the horror of European colonization.]

British colonisation of Australia began in Sydney in 1788. The most immediate consequence of British settlement - within weeks of the first colonists' arrival - was a wave of Old World epidemic diseases. Smallpox alone killed more than 50% of the Aboriginal population living in the vicinity of Sydney.[9][10] The second consequence of British settlement was appropriation of land and water resources. The combination of disease, loss of land and direct violence reduced the Aboriginal population by up to 80% between 1788 and 1900. A wave of massacres and resistance followed the frontier of British settlement. By the 1870s all the fertile areas of Australia had been appropriated, and Indigenous communities reduced to impoverished remnants living either on the fringes of cities and towns or on lands considered unsuitable for settlement. Many Indigenous people adapted to European culture, working as stock hands or labourers. With the exception of a few in the remote interior, all surviving Indigenous communities gradually became dependent on the settler population for their livelihood. By the early 20th century the Indigenous population had declined to an estimated 150,000 from 190,000.[11]

Commonwealth legislation in 1962 specifically gave Aborigines the right to vote in Commonwealth elections. The 1967 referendum allowed the Commonwealth to make laws with respect to Aboriginal people, and for Aboriginal people to be included when the country does a count to determine electoral representation. In the 1971 controversial Gove land rights case, Justice Blackburn ruled that Australia had been terra nullius before British settlement, and that no concept of native title existed in Australian law. In 1972, the Aboriginal Tent Embassy was established on the steps of Parliament House in Canberra. In 1992, the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in the Mabo Case, declaring the previous legal concept of terra nullius to be invalid.
 
Old February 12th, 2008 #6
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

The present Aboriginal population in Australia is around 460,000, which is about 2,27 % of the total Australian population. They live in all parts of Australia, but there is a large concentration in Queensland.

In 1972, the Aboriginal Land Right Commission was established to investigate how land could be returned to the Aboriginals. This was the first time that the Australian government acknowledged that land was taken away from the Aboriginals and that it was right to give it back. This research was limited to the Northern Territory, which directly fell under the Federal Australian Government.
 
Old February 12th, 2008 #7
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Other estimates claim there are 200,000 abos today, not 450,000.
 
Old February 12th, 2008 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

The natural way to report the data below would focus on the extraordinary, by White standards, proclivity for crime the abos exhibit. Academic Broadhurst, predictably, sticks with the jew-leftist convention of portraying protected minority as the victim rather than the perpetrators. Leftists only mention minority groups and crime in two ways: to claim they are overrepresented in prison and as victims of crime. Omitted are the essential facts that they are victims of crimes committed by their own kind, and that they are not overrepresented in prison, they are committing far more jailable offenses, per capita, than other groups. As we see above, the actual fact of the matter is they are punished less heavily than Whites.


Aborigines and Crime in Australia

Roderic Broadhurst

Crime and Justice, Vol. 21, Ethnicity, Crime and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives (1997), pp. 407-468

This article consists of 62 page(s).

Aborigines are:

- 16 times more likely in Western Australia to be victims of homicide and
- 6.5 times more likely to report crimes against the person to police than are non-Aborigines
- 9.2 times more likely to be arrested
- 6.2 times more likely to be imprisoned by lower courts
- 23.7 times more likely to be imprisoned as an adult
- 48 times more likely to be imprisoned as juveniles than non-Aborigines.

The increased overrepresentation from arrest to imprisonment appears largely a function of the very high levels of recidivism found among Aborigines:

- 88 percent of male Aborigines are rearrested compared with 52 percent of non-Aborigines
- 75 percent of Aborigines return to prison at least once compared with 43 percent of non-Aboriginal males.

States with a high Aboriginal "cultural strength" and socioeconomic "stress" index are the most punitive. "Cultural strength," "stress," and imprisonment are highly correlated and associated with those states with the most "frontier" characteristics.


[Entire article only available in paid archive.]

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=019...TOR-reducePage

Last edited by Alex Linder; February 12th, 2008 at 07:34 PM.
 
Old February 13th, 2008 #9
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default


Brief History of Jew Attempts to Inculcate Guilt in White Australians


SYDNEY, Australia (JTA) -- In what could be described as Australia's
Yom Kippur, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd expressed Wednesday the one word
his predecessors refused to utter to indigenous Australians: Sorry.
Rudd's Labor Party wrested power from John Howard's Liberals Last
November on a platform that included apologizing to the "Stolen
Generations" -- up to 100,000 mostly mixed-blood Aboriginal children
who were forcibly removed from their families between 1910 and 1970.
The text of the motion on the Stolen Generations, which won bipartisan
support, acknowledged the "profound grief, suffering and loss"
inflicted on Aborigines.


Australian Jews, some of whom have been at the forefront of the
decades-long reconciliation effort, applauded the apology. "To the
mothers and the fathers, the brothers and the sisters, for the
breaking up of families and communities, we say sorry," Rudd said.
"And for the indignity and degradation thus inflicted on a proud
people and a proud culture, we say sorry." In a historic speech that
drew cheers and tears, Rudd said he hoped the apology would remove "a
great stain from the nation's soul." Mark Leibler, the co-chair of
Reconciliation Australia
, a national organization that promotes
reconciliation, said Rudd's apology marked a "watershed" in Australian
history but that this should be just the beginning of the
reconciliation process
. [Translation: now that the jews have got the Whites to admit guilt, they can start guilting money out of them at higher levels than they already are.]

"The shame as far as this country is concerned will not be cleared up
until we bridge the 17-year gap in the life expectancy between
indigenous and non-indigenous Australians," said Leibler, who attended
the apology ceremony in Canberra on Wednesday. Leibler is also the
chairman of the world board of trustees of Keren Hayesod/United Israel
Appeal and national chairman of the Australia/Israel and Jewish
Affairs Council.
"We've suffered 2,000 years of [imaginary] persecution, and we
understand what it is to be the underdog and to suffer from
disadvantage," he said. Jews have been at the forefront of pushing for
civil rights in Australia.


In 1965, Jim Spigelman, a cousin of the Pulitzer Prize-winning
cartoonist Art Spiegelman and now chief justice of the Supreme Court
of New South Wales, led 30 students on the first Australian Freedom
Ride
-- a journey into Outback Australia to protest racial
discrimination against Aborigines, who were not entitled to vote and
were prohibited from swimming pools, pubs and other public places
. In
the country town of Moree, a racist mob attacked the students and,
according to newspaper reports at the time, Spigelman was smacked to
the ground. The man most Jews and Aborigines hail as having made the
greatest contribution to the cause of Aboriginal rights is Ron Castan,
a Jewish Australian dubbed by Aboriginal leaders as the "great white
warrior."


[Precise parallels to the judeo-communist revolutionary work in the so-called civil rights movement of the 1960s in America.]


Castan, who died in 1999, was the lead counsel in the landmark 1992
Australian Supreme Court "Mabo judgment" -- named for plaintiff Eddie
Mabo -- which overturned the legal fiction that Australia was "terra
nullius,"
or an uninhabited land, when white settlers first arrived in
1788. Aborigines now own more than 10 percent of Australia's land
mass.
In a 1998 speech, Castan implored the government to say it was
sorry, citing Holocaust denial in his argument. "The refusal to
apologize for dispossession, for massacres and for the theft of
children is the Australian equivalent of the Holocaust deniers --
those who say it never really happened," Castan charged.
In 1999, Howard proposed a motion expressing "deep and sincere regret"
for the injustices suffered by Aborigines, but the then-prime minister
said Australians "should not be required to accept guilt and blame"
for the policies of previous governments.


Aborigines number about 450,000 in an Australian population of 21
million.
[Other estimates say they are 200,000] They are the most disadvantaged group in Australia, suffering
high rates of infant mortality, unemployment, alcohol abuse and
domestic violence. More than 100 members of the Stolen Generations
were present at Wednesday's ceremony, which was broadcast live on
national television and on giant screens across the country. "Our
faith teaches and emphasizes the universal principles of coexistence
and respect for human dignity and rights," [lied] Rabbi Mordechai Gutnick,
the president of the Organization of Rabbis of Australia, said in a
statement. "It teaches the need to recognize and rectify any failings
we may display in our interaction between our fellow man. To say
'sorry' in a meaningful manner goes a long way in ensuring that
mistakes and discrimination will not be repeated."

In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were
instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia
Policy
, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-white
immigration to Australia
.

[Again: direct parallel to jews' work in America. Jews were the driving power behind the overturning of the 1924 immigration act that kept stocks in their current balance. After the 1965 "reform," immigration to America became over 90% non-White, to say nothing of illegal invasion, which burgeoned.]


The president of the Executive Council of
Australian Jewry, Robert Goot, said he is proud of the Jewish
community's ongoing commitment to reconciliation. Rudd's apology
marked "the beginning in a new chapter in the quest by indigenous
Australians for complete equality with their fellow Australians," Goot
observed. Rabbi Jeremy Lawrence of the Great Synagogue in Sydney said
in a speech on reconciliation last week that Jews must not "deny nor
stand by nor stand silent in the face of the pain of the Stolen
Generations. It is incumbent on us to acknowledge the wrong, to
apologize for the damage caused."

Noting the importance to Jews of the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in
Jerusalem, the British-born rabbi said Australia should have a similar
institution for Aborigines. "There ought to be a national place where
people who have suffered can come and identify with their past and
understand that the incursion of their culture and heritage has been
recognized and an apology has been made," he said. Rudd's apology
comes more than a decade after a 1997 inquiry in Australia's
parliament, called the "Bringing Them Home" report, concluded that the
Aborigines suffered "an act of genocide aimed at wiping out indigenous
families, communities and cultures." The report urged the government
to apologize and offer compensation to the victims and their families.
The apology offers no recourse to compensation, although the issue is
now being hotly debated. It also reignited the so-called "history
wars" between those who believe the Stolen Generations were kidnapped
in a sinister attempt to breed out their Aboriginality and others who
say it was a benevolent attempt to save half-caste children from the
ills of Aboriginal society.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/news...borigines.html
 
Old December 28th, 2008 #10
Brian Foley
Member
 
Brian Foley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
We are only too happy to take back all the above and return you to the paradise of the "outback", whenever you are ready..

Time was when we organized horse parties in Tasmania to Fox hunt Aborigines .
 
Old March 17th, 2010 #11
Darius Appleby
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
Thumbs up No guilt here!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Foley View Post

Time was when we organized horse parties in Tasmania to Fox hunt Aborigines .
Not just Tasmania, White people cleaned out the feral abo pests from many regions of the mainland continent.

The only problem is that we didn't get rid of them all, that is those that couldn't survive the smallpox and the common cold.

These wretched creatures only produce animal sub-human qualities when they are bred with Whites. Then taxpayers pay for the 1/32nd or 1/64th abo animal nigger in the woodpile.

It makes more sense to pay for Tasmanian Devils and platypus.
 
Old March 18th, 2010 #12
The Bobster
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Filthydelphia
Posts: 10,095
Default

Abos were well on their way to extinction when libtards moved in and saved them.
 
Old April 12th, 2010 #13
Jurgenmac
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 169
Default

Abos are clearly a different species also. This is another topic that never gets mentioned. the need to reform taxonomy . It is insulting to us for all these species of walking monkey to be called one species. Darwin was not happy with it but did not choose to take on the Christ-insane in his day over it.
 
Old April 18th, 2010 #14
Darius Appleby
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
Lightbulb Hobbit fossil species

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurgenmac View Post
Abos are clearly a different species also. This is another topic that never gets mentioned. the need to reform taxonomy . It is insulting to us for all these species of walking monkey to be called one species. Darwin was not happy with it but did not choose to take on the Christ-insane in his day over it.
Science News

'Hobbit' Fossil Likely Represents New Branch On Human Family Tree

ScienceDaily (Mar. 4, 2005) — A fossil of a diminutive human nicknamed "the Hobbit" likely represents a previously unrecognized species of early humans, according to the results of a detailed comparison of the fossil's brain case with those of humans, apes and other human ancestors.

Skeptics had argued that the Hobbit, discovered in Indonesia and first announced last fall, could have been an individual who suffered from a disorder that limited brain growth known as microcephaly. The fossils' discoverers had suggested that the Hobbit was either a pygmy form of a known species or a previously undiscovered species of early humans.
The new data on the Hobbit reveal little similarity to microcephalics and pygmies and support the theory that the fossil is a member of a unique ancestral species, according to researchers who publish their results online this week in Science. Scientists at Florida State University; Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis; the University of New England, Australia; and the Indonesian Centre for Archaeology, Jakarta authored the new paper.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0304175249.htm

This Hobbit species was thought to have lived 18,000 years ago. The abos are thought to have arrived in Australia 40,000 years ago. This is more evidence of separate species in the region.
 
Old May 8th, 2010 #15
aherne
Senior Member
 
aherne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: semitically occupied territory
Posts: 2,096
Default

Since I'm into wildlife conservation, I strongly disagree with hunting down aborigines, but agree with the obvious fact that let loose they constitute a danger to humans, thus have to be contained into reservations so that visitors will have a living reminder how our ancestors looked like 500.000 years ago.
__________________
"Any man who is not attacked in the Jewish newspapers, not slandered and vilified, is no decent German and no true National Socialist." - Adolf Hitler
 
Old May 8th, 2010 #16
Darius Appleby
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
Question ancestors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aherne View Post
Since I'm into wildlife conservation, I strongly disagree with hunting down aborigines, but agree with the obvious fact that let loose they constitute a danger to humans, thus have to be contained into reservations so that visitors will have a living reminder how our ancestors looked like 500.000 years ago.
They can't be OUR ancestors if they are of a different species, just another lower branch on the tree.
 
Old May 16th, 2010 #17
white_phosphorous
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,635
Default

A bit OT- did anyone happen to catch the jewish guilt-fest movie "Australia"? I went to see it bc the I was dating an aussie girl at the time; it was not hyped as what it was in the adverts. It was hyped as a White movie. My ass wasn't in the seat 5 minutes, and the first thing on screen is text about the abos and the "stolen generation." I wanted to vomit. Worst movie in history. And Nicole Kidman is not even attractive anymore since she sold her soul and race mixed.

Avoid movie "australia" at all costs.
 
Old May 23rd, 2010 #18
MWD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: THE EUSSR
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurgenmac View Post
Abos are clearly a different species also. This is another topic that never gets mentioned. the need to reform taxonomy . It is insulting to us for all these species of walking monkey to be called one species. Darwin was not happy with it but did not choose to take on the Christ-insane in his day over it.
Your not white yourself, that black middle eastern thick hair and strange shaped head and permant brown skin is not a white european trait.
 
Old June 10th, 2010 #19
Xuxalina Rihhia
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FUCK YOU!
Posts: 1,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aherne View Post
Since I'm into wildlife conservation, I strongly disagree with hunting down aborigines, but agree with the obvious fact that let loose they constitute a danger to humans, thus have to be contained into reservations so that visitors will have a living reminder how our ancestors looked like 500.000 years ago.
I think it's best to keep the Aboboongs in reservations. Also, the fact that they would squander their money in drink and other nonsens is why when aboboongs worked for Whites, they were usually paid in meat, salt and clothing. This was actually a kindness to the Aboboongvandals because by getting what they need, they would not then go after drink and drugs.
 
Old June 15th, 2010 #20
V.K.
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: QLD Australia
Posts: 1,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by white_phosphorous View Post
A bit OT- did anyone happen to catch the jewish guilt-fest movie "Australia"? I went to see it bc the I was dating an aussie girl at the time; it was not hyped as what it was in the adverts. It was hyped as a White movie. My ass wasn't in the seat 5 minutes, and the first thing on screen is text about the abos and the "stolen generation." I wanted to vomit. Worst movie in history. And Nicole Kidman is not even attractive anymore since she sold her soul and race mixed.

Avoid movie "australia" at all costs.
I hated that movie. It was so terrible. All the actors just seemed dumb. I actually thought it was going to be a serious movie.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.
Page generated in 0.14917 seconds.