|
April 4th, 2009 | #21 |
Homeward Yankee
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 279
|
There is something to what you’re saying, General.
There is something to what you’re saying, General. A great many liberals couldn’t emotionally manage an actual civil war. White lady liberals of the sort who comprised the million mom march or who reflexively choose feel-good social policies, would mentally breakdown if faced with the images of a civil war in the United States. Pictures of young white men who were killed and wounded would confuse them. Many such women wouldn’t be able to process their conflicting impulses - nurture versus ZOG training, motherly anxiety versus anti-racist indignation. If the resistance was determined and if it continued for only a few months, a great many liberal women would want peace at any cost.
One of the things about war is that it makes people reassess how invested they are in their belief systems. I know several gals who are Obama-philes and who vote Democratic because they think that the Dems are more in tune with women’s issues. But these same gals also understand that their boyfriends vote Republican. These gals think of the Dems as a more caring and nurturing party, just as they think that the GOP is a more masculine and indifferent party. If Washington liberals gave the order to kill and keep killing their boyfriends, or their boyfriend’s ilk a few states over, a lot of girlish Democrats wouldn’t be Democrats anymore. Many women like to use political and social power to bully men, but they make such maneuvers from within a cocoon of assumptions about what is at stake and what the rules are. War changes the rules. War simplifies the rules. And there’s never been a shooting war in history where all the womenfolk of one race supported their kinfolk’s enemies. |
April 4th, 2009 | #22 | |
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
|
|
April 4th, 2009 | #23 |
Homeward Yankee
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 279
|
Ha
Ha. True, the history of secession movements in North America after the late 1700s isn’t encouraging. Yet women didn’t have suffrage during the Civil War. They didn’t have TVs and video journalists to keep their doe-eyes filled with horrifying images. And there weren’t female politicos of any consequence.
Women were politically inconsequential during that era and the war was more an abstraction on a day to day basis for folks in the Northern Cities. |
April 4th, 2009 | #24 |
Administrator
|
Well, I don't disagree with anything you've said.
I have no doubt something, eventually, could be forced on the kiken monstrosity that isn't our government - if we had a body of men willing to fight and kill and die. We don't have that today. Whites have not reached the level of sand niggers, in that regard. It helps revolutionaries to have a sea to swim in. I don't think people are for us or against us. I don't think they're much of anything. They just do what superior power tells them. Does ZOG's power extend beyond the reach of its guns and tv? I don't think it does. I think very few people believe its lies enough to defend them, if it came to it. |
April 4th, 2009 | #25 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
April 4th, 2009 | #26 | |
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
If you read the news coming out of Hawaii, they may be taking the lead on any future secessionist movement. They are getting damned sick and tired of being told by Zog (however nicely) that they cannot relegate non-natives to 3rd class citizenship based on their race. Especially niggers. Were it not for the ZOG tit that feeds the bulk of them, they would have already taken their leave, I believe. Yes, welfare and poverty is rampant in Hawaii. I went there a couple of years ago. And like every beach city I've ever been to, Honolulu, about 2 miles inland from the beach, is a decrepit slum. You'd never know that from the jewtube, but take my word for it. On or near the beach, it's really nice: Palm trees and ocean breezes; tropical drinks with big chunks of pineapple; don't worry be happy. But just a little bit inland, it's a slum and the people there don't like you because you have white skin. They were annexed by the white man and they resent it. They want to be their own nation again. Let them, I say. Last edited by Marse Supial; April 4th, 2009 at 02:58 AM. |
|
April 4th, 2009 | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,463
|
And TOQ wouldn't give Alex Linder an award. However, they might give it to you if you write it anonymously like George Orwell (real name: Eric Blair).
Quote:
|
|
April 4th, 2009 | #28 | |
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
General Sheridan, in the Indian wars, by way of contrast, had no compunction about killing every living thing. Even the youngest of Indian children. Babies. "Nits", he said, "become lice." And in the context of a war, he was right. Ruthlessness and dogged determination wins wars. Last edited by Marse Supial; April 4th, 2009 at 02:57 AM. |
|
April 4th, 2009 | #29 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,463
|
Quote:
A Yankee is first and foremost a moralizing, self-righteous, hypocritical genocidal mass murderer. The lowest form of pond scum. |
|
April 4th, 2009 | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,463
|
wintermute, Anti-Yuppie, or guessedworker could kill this essay contest. The first two don't post anymore and the last one has his own vehicle.
No one, and I mean no one, knows the Jew better than wintermute. |
April 5th, 2009 | #31 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Sometimes it seems like Lee and Southerners, for all their words, don't really believe their own bullshit about the evils of the Yanks. Like they can't accept in their heart of hearts the Yanks can't be brought around. Well, this non-Southerner does! I know these liberals and jews first hand, and never were they better summed than in Judge Lawless' 'sanctimonious madmen.' They are crazed, hate-filled cultists, and anyone who pops their bubble with facts or even merely objections is like someone begging off Koolaid in Guyana. Ang Lee got it perfectly in "Ride with the Devil" - they have to make everybody think like they do. And there is nothing they will not do to stop those who disagree with them. They will smear them, they will suppress them, they will murder them. The combination of WASP liberal and commie jew is the worst juggernaut the world has ever seen. It is a sick, fucked up cult they have made of the geo they control, and I will do whatever I can to defeat them. |
|
April 5th, 2009 | #32 |
Homeward Yankee
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 279
|
Hey Alex,
I agree. I’ve taken a year off from working to write a book, a fiction book, that I hope will give their “juggernaut” media-machine a dose of its own medicine - a small dose of course, but a dose none-the-less. I’ve focused rather a lot on character development and on attributing pathologies and other unflattering traits to the kinds of characters who normally get flattering treatments in popular fiction. It’s been a real catharsis to hold them mute for a change and to build a story that gives us both emotional depth and a worthy voice.
I’m about 250 pages into the book, and I reckon I’ll be done by mid-summer or sooner. I realize that the story won’t change the world, but I’m okay with that. It just seems important to fight them. |
April 5th, 2009 | #33 |
Administrator
|
That's true. But more significant, for purposes of opposing him, is recognizing that he is also highly intelligent, dedicated, competent and thorough. That's the part the good ol' boys don't like talking about.
|
April 5th, 2009 | #34 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
April 5th, 2009 | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,110
|
Quote:
I think that, all other things being equal, the region with the most natural resources is the one to migrate to and build numbers in. It needs to have waterway or, ideally, coastal access. Chinese don't give a fuck who they're selling to as long as your pay them, for example. It seems to me that whatever region this is would likely be in the western US(unfortunately, the SW is out because of lack of resources.) Inland Washington may have a lot of spics, but they can be driven out, and some courageous white men could have a lot of fun doing it too. |
|
April 5th, 2009 | #36 | |
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
When I die and go to heaven, God is going to give me a dozen or so 18 wheelers full of fully automatic M-16s and about 5 billion rounds of ammunition. God will be wearing a confederate uniform. He will send me back to 1855, and he will say: "Second chance!! Go win that war this time!!!" |
|
April 5th, 2009 | #37 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
He ended the comment with a question: "Still wish the South had won the war"? |
|
April 5th, 2009 | #38 | |
Creepy-Ass Cracker
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where "Yes" Is A Two-Syllable Word.
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
Did we ditch slavery because we found Jesus? Did we ditch slavery because the Yankees forced us into it? Did we ditch slavery becuase it was not profitable anymore? Or a combination of the above? |
|
April 6th, 2009 | #39 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
|
|
April 6th, 2009 | #40 |
Administrator
|
Slavery existed in the north until it wasn't profitable. I'm not sure how profitable it was in the South after Whitney invented the cotton gin. There were never more than a few hundred thousand or a couple millions slaves imported to the US, so, since there are 35m nigs today, they multiplied just fine on their own.
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|