|
|
August 10th, 2009 | #1 | ||||
Administrator
|
Linder's Strategy: Attack the Conservatives
[The following is from a different thread. It presents the case for treating conservatives as the other liberals - attacking them as our enemies since they have all, down to the last one, sold out or truckled under to the dominant jew.]
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yes. The rise of nationalism is almost a mathematical function of the decline of conservatism. I'll now slightly expand that answer. Ordinary people, not all that different from you, are not real swift. They can barely distinguish the ground from the sky. Pat Buchanan is enough like us that it confuses people. The same can be said for all conservatives: they favor some of the same things we do (basically, acting normally - respect for the respectable in everyday life), which makes them, the conservatives, a plausible opponent to the weirdos of the left. Do you understand the implications that flow, for our position, from the fact that tens of millions of people believe that by supporting 'the right' they can effect the kind of political change we need to get back to Normal White America? If they think the solution lies within the system, i.e., through supporting one or other of the people/parties they see on tv/in the papers, then why the heck would they ever bother about us? I want you to take ten or fifteen days, however much time you need, to digest this point: IF BUCHANAN CAN GET THE JOB DONE, WHY THE HECK DOES THE PUBLIC NEED US? Now, if the public doesn't need Buchanan, because he can't get the job done...then the next epiphany is that Buchanan is an obstacle to the public seeing us, and pondering our case, and realizing that we alone, we White Nationalists, have what is needed to get the job done. Buchanan and his ilk are...in the way. He is on tv and in the papers daily. Our people are not. He's close enough to our position, plausible enough a representative of normal-white interests, that masses of people, dim by nature, tired by overwork, just might be fooled by him. God knows they always have been. And that's how we've ended up where we are. Now, Buchanan has no reason to change: his shtik and spiel have made him rich. WE ARE THE ONES WHO MUST CHANGE. So I don't want to hear any shit about how I'm wrong in attacking little Catholic Patsy. Attacking conservatives as cowards and weaklings is precisely what we need. It is tactically even more important than attacking liberals, because the people we want already hate them, and their power is merely a function of their support for the jews' agenda. We can't polarize the public between Whites and jews until conservatives, the have-it-both-ways people, are roadkilled and dragged off on the shoulder. Only then does the political Chicken, begin... Knocking Pat off the air is like knocking the flowers off a Pasadena New Year's float. It shows the ugly chicken wire cage of jewish totalitarianism beneath the pretty colors and designs and smiling waving chesties. It reveals to the public what's actually going on: naked jewish tyranny. No one who disagrees with the jews in any way is allowed face or sheet time in AmeriKwa. That awakening is good for our side. It is necessary. Pat Buchanan and other seemingly rational conservative geldings on tv and in the papers hurts our side, because they make it look like the system is open. For the mass of people, none to bright to begin with, and tired from work, can't make out the difference. They don't spend all day on the Internet studying politics. They're working. They need things gross and crude, otherwise they're going to be fooled by polished professionals like Pat. But if he doesn't have the answers we need as a race, then it is in our interest that he be knocked off tv, because he can only mislead people as to the cause of our decline. I'm pleonasming my ass off, but I really don't think you dimwits won't benefit from overbludgeoning. So just read more and think a little, or wave your feelers, or whatever you do to receive sensory input. To repeat: Ordinary dimwits cannot distinguish the White Nationalist position from the conservative position, since our side is kept off tv by the jews. In order to make our presence known, we have to KNOCK THE CONSERVATIVES OUT OF THE WAY. The fact that they somewhat look like us, and that some of our policies overlap (anti-queer, anti-feminist, pro-borders, etc.) does not mean they are on our side. They are in fact spittingly hostile to us. They call us kooks, loons, crazies, basement dwellers - in short, there is no term of abuse used by the commie-jew-left against us that is not also used by the commie-jew-controlled-right. That ought to be a lesson to you dimwits, but, being tepid namby-pambies like 99% of white males, you just smooth over the differences like a wife who doesn't want to make trouble. We'll find a way to muddle through somehow, just pretend that we all get along, that we're all on the same side. Even though we're not, and it only helps the already rich and cowardly pretenders called conservatives who look down on us and do all they can to destroy our school and reputations to preserve their status as the real outsiders and alternative to the judeo-System. Nah, just pretend. "It's better that way," as the wigger in the Offspring song sings. Better to be a big fat stupid undiscriminating barren pussy like Starr or her cat than to stand up for yourself, your school, your leaders, your principles, your race. If you think Pat Buchanan is a good guy, and helping our cause, you are not a White Nationalist. White nationalists have nearly as much difficulty as the average joe in understanding what's going on in politics because: a) they are nearly as dim-witted as pro wrestling fans; b) they have never seen professional conservatism from the inside, so they think it is something other than "a game; a way of making a living," as Joe Sobran called it. Wise up, idiots. Pat Buchanan is not interested in standing up for you, he's interested in getting into your wallet. WN Buchanan fans are the exact equivalent of a chick who thinks a guy really likes her when in fact he just wants sex. Pat's interested in you watching him on tv and thinking he stands for the change you want. He isn't, but if he can put on a good enough show to fool you, he's got your money. And he knows you're stupid. He knows, as he would put it, hard-core WN have "nowhere else to go." No one else on tv even pretends to be right wing. That makes him the it girl. And until WN scorn him and demand better, he's right. Again, if you support Buchanan, you are a conservative, not a White nationalist. Fuck the Kwanservatives, we're the Sex Pistols What our White Nationalist cause needs to do to succeed is to polarize the nation between jews and White Nationalists. That means, in tardspeak, that the average dolt, let's call him Special Mark, the guy who reads the paper for twenty minutes before dinner, must perceive that there are two competing visions out there, between which he can choose: 1) the judeo-System - the debt-sex-vice-sports-multicult vision 2) the White Nationalist system - a White nation without jews, muds or neo-morals Polarizing the public between these positions is a tall order. It means destroying the dominant conceptual framework as it exists now: with false option A (liberals/Democrats) and false option B (conservatives/Republicans). Ordinary people cannot make out, without help, that there is not a dime's worth of difference between right and left, they are two puppets pulled over the filthy claws of the eagle-nosed kike who actually runs things and makes all the decisions. It is our job to expose, reveal, destroy. Part of that revelation is beating the living hell out of the conservatives until ordinary people perceive them as the weaklings, laughingstocks, and System tools they are. In practical terms, polarization entails demonizing and attacking the RIGHT, THE CONSERVATIVES, the PALEOCONSERVATIVES even more than the left-liberal-PC-communists. We should not only attack the fake right, the false opposition, we should attack them with joy and relish. Laughter indicates the laugher is or feels superior to the target. That's exactly the meta-message the winning politician must communicate - that he is stronger than his opponent. That he is the bull goose in the pen. That is a lesson the conservative never understands, which is why he is always fighting uphill. Footnoting is for cowards and folks who don't get it. At best it's fill-in stuff. No footnote ever won a political battle. A political battle is just the human version of that nature channel perennial: the battle between bulls for mating rights. Bluffing is involved, and laughing is essential to bluffing, as ridicule can destroy anything. Anyone preferring reasoned discourse over laughter, if not an actual academic, to whom foonoting is proper, is very likely a coward or a dullard. We beat the jews by laughing at them and fighting them. Laughter is the proper means of verbal warfare. Not "proving" things. Not footnoting. Not remonstrating. Not being polite and respectful. Not playing along with appearances. Not not doubting motives. All those are for weaklings, for losers, for conservatives. We are not they. "I'm not like you [Kwanservative] Charlie Brown [with your fulsome MLKommie praise, your love of diversity, your pathetic and ineffectual puling], I have to win sometimes." We White Nationalists are lions. Well, we're cubs who might become lions if we act right. The conservatives are dung beetles. After the jews have eaten the wildebeest and pooped out the remains, the Pat Buchanans of "It's Pat" fame crinkle by on their six little feet, and roll up the salubrious balls of dung on which they subsist. Do you want to be a lion or a dung beetle, White man? If you agree there are things a grown man, a political analyst, can't say, you are giving your seal of approval to the cowardice that is putting our race in the ground. You hurt our cause and you are not welcome at VNNForum. White nationalism has a higher standard than you are able to meet. The conservatives, including Pat Buchanan, must be destroyed, run off, hounded into irrelevancy, so that the people can see that we, not he and his febrile faileocons, are the REAL alternative to the evil jews producing The System Show. I really have been impressed these last few months at the childlike cluelessness of so many who think they are WN. The typical WN thinks he is displaying his sophistication when he makes excuses for why this or that kahnster dung beetle can't say this or that. Let me tell you, men of gerbil: You're not sophisticated. You're stupid dupes and dullards. You think Buchanan is really putting one over on the dominant kikes, and you're right. He is putting one over. Not on the kikes. On you. I have worked in these offices. I have taken the calls from liberal talking head A asking if conservative talkie B wants to go out for drinks after work. These guys are all buddies. They live the good life by putting on a Punch and Judy show for the mass morons like you. Some of the leftists might be honest about what they believe, since they can say EVERYTHING they want, qualified only by tactical advisability. But none of the rightists are anything but tools, except for the jewish neocons, who root and jew about with freedom, as they are kikes. As John Derbyshire at least had the courage to admit, everything he writes is conditioned by his fear of jews. If he displeases them, he has no job. Men who accept employment as political writers/analysts on terms that require them to relinquish their manhood and their independent judgment are unworthy of respect or subsidy. They are, rather, to be despised and spit on as weaklings. If you don't agree with this statement, you are not a white nationalist. You are a conservative. Cowardice at no time in White history has been acceptable in a political leader. That is a horrid and disgusting innovation of the 20th century. Reject it. Now is the first time in history that White men, almost across the board, willingly agreed to sacrifice their honor and their independence for a paycheck. Pat Buchanan and the rest of the paleocons are house eunuchs waving palm fronds for the Pet pashas who employ them. A white nationalist who praises Pat Buchanan and makes excuses for him is seen by me, and by Pat himself, as a fool. A man with no self respect has no respect for others too stupid to see him for what he is. Pat Buchanan knows how to wink and nod at WN in order to suck our money. And too many of you idiots think he's helping us rather than helping himself by using us. Pat Buchanan is dangerous to our cause because of his virtues - his learning and his political knowledge. He knows precisely how to affect that he is one of us. He know that hinting that he stands for all that is white and good is the way to fill his coffers. He also knows that that is his role within the jewish system. You have to give a little to get a little, the jewish tyrant knows. Pat is that giving a little. To maintain the fiction of an open system, there have to be at least a few people who appear, and appear plausibly, to oppose the powers that be. Pat Buchanan is precisely that man. As a good little Irish Catholic, PB always runs cringing and whimpering back to Authority, because that is his nature, and that is how he was raised and trained. Religious folks like PB have no problem with shitty, self-interested behavior as long as the dirt is done in private, and the facade kept up in public. The idea of saying the same thing in private as you do in public is foreign to the Christian, as is any ideal of manliness. Christianity is a shabby thing. The White fool imagines that Buchanan aids our cause. The reality is that our cause aids Buchanan. Buchanan never says a word about White dispossession. He never says a word about jews controlling our government. He openly advised the Republicans to undercut the most successful White political candidate of the last 25 years, David Duke. Buchanan is a team player, and a System dolly all the way to the bank. WN is a cause that he can watch and steal the best arguments from, without crediting the men who thought them up - the revisionists now languishing in jail, for example. That way he can maximize his support base and shine up his radical veneer while staying safe with the jews. Most people, as I started and will end with, can't make out a clever, well written conservative position coming from the pen of someone like Buchanan from a genuine white nationalist position. It is in our interest that we do everything possible to help them, and that surely and necessarily entails attacking and destroying Pat Buchanan. If you don't agree with that position, you are not one of us. You are a conservative. Anything that obscures the difference between White nationalism and conservatism is detrimental to our cause. Politics is a zero-sum game. Money and time that go to Pat Buchanan and the faileocons are money and attention that do not go to White nationalists. Any so-called WN who praises Buchanan and encourages us to support him is objectively damaging our cause - by aiding men who already possess tremendous material (money and tv access) advantages over us. Not to mention men who, whenver the question is put to them directly, denounce us. Accept nothing but the real thing, White men. Raise your standards. Pat Buchanan is our competitor. Pat Buchanan is our enemy. Last edited by Alex Linder; August 10th, 2009 at 01:51 PM. |
||||
August 10th, 2009 | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
Isn't the fact that Patsy is part of the fake opposition self-evident? He works for MSNBC, is published in most if not all major jew newspapers, has written numerous books...some of them best sellers and is a millionaire because of it. Now ask yourself, why is the former Republican presidential contender treated differently by the main stream jews media than David Duke. Clearly Duke is just as educated, well informed and well read as Buchanan is. Duke was duly elected a member of Louisiana House of Representatives in 1989. Garnered 43.51% of the vote in his US Senate bid in 1990. But for some odd reason Duke is treated as a pariah while Patsy makes the rounds at cocktail parties inside the beltway. It ain't rocket science folks. |
|
August 10th, 2009 | #3 |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Most Whites continue to view the GOP as their political "home" despite its me-too, day-late-dollar-short, "some of my best friends are Negroes" liberalism.
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
August 10th, 2009 | #4 | ||
Administrator
|
Thanks, I think it makes a good case, and one I have not seen rebutted. Nor has what I advise been attempted. I think the reason it has not been attempted is the default position, even for racialists, is courteous, cautious, respectful. At least for the high-IQ racialists. Trapped in their British cultural ways (America's cultural ways are British in origin), American WN brains are unable to get past personality to principle. This is where the Germans have us beat. This, not in the regalia, is where learning from and copying the Germans makes sense. Take the personality out of it. Take an objective look at what helps or hinders our cause, and proceed accordingly. Now, fair point is not always clear what helps/hinders, but I rejoin with the cliche that always doing X produces the same failed results, try a different approach. Which is what I advocate: a different approach. Try not praising Buchanan but attacking him - not only will it help you, it will help Buchanan's ilk. They'll either grow balls or they'll shrivel up and die. All must be done to force these sad pathetics with one foot on the pier of respectable conservatism and one foot in the boat of radicalism to make a choice or fall in the water. (I wish someone would make a cartoon of this. Show Canny Sammy positioned such, half off a pier laden with delicious pies, and other foot in bass boat headed for freedom island. Something like that.)
The WASP-American racialists can't grasp that because he likes the cut of Buchanan's jib doesn't mean the little fellow is on our side, nor that his work doesn't hurt us. Compounded in here is perhaps the beaten-child syndrome. Even though his parents beat him, they were all he knew growing up, so he loves and returns to them. So it is with WN and conservatism. The real thing being unallowed in the papers, the conservatives were the first love of most of us, when we were green and assumed that the papers were where lies and truth did battle, rather than lies and lies. I am going to write an essay on the mistaken concept of 'gateways' at some point. A lot of people are hung up on that point. It's a version of the cock crows before the sunrise, therefore his crowing causes the sunrise. Fallacy. Quote:
You don't break into something without swagger. Making your rational points is dandy but it doesn't turn heads and puncture maidens. Can't we learn from masters? What did Hitler say about masses? They're feminine. They need a strong lead. Buchanan is a plausible strong lead. When "our" side is praising him, all that does is reinforce that he has a plausible solution to the problems he discusses. I don't know whether "our" guys think they're just being fair, or they can't get over loving their "gateway" drug, or they just can't get over their inherent bourgeois respect for fame and money, but it doesn't matter: Buchanan is not us. Support for Buchanan comes directly out of our funds and our mindshare. Everything we do should take pains to separate ourselves from the conservatives. We should attack the liberals simultaneously, but we needn't separate ourselves as no one mistakes them for us, because 95% of what we say and the judeo-left says are radically opposed. Whereas with the conservatives, there's probably at least fifty percent overlap. The master's other principle? Propaganda must be dumb enough to reach the lowest IQ you're shooting for. Simple and repetitive messages win the day. That's how we've always done it at VNN, so that everybody on the Net knows our position. Even when they're on our side and mocking it, they know EXACTLY where we stand. Who else can that be said of? Quote:
Last edited by Alex Linder; August 10th, 2009 at 04:37 PM. |
||
August 10th, 2009 | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Aryania
Posts: 99
|
Good Thread, and Alex made some great Posts. Very enjoyable reading. A good case is made that Conservatives are competitors. Yes they are. I do not think otherwise. The fact that many WNs come out of conservative ranks makes the proposition to condemn them a bit awkward. What are we aligned with, the left? I may be the only WN left who does see things in left and right, certainly not the hocus pocus of ‘Third Positionist’, which is hardly a position at all, more like a “don’t ask me what I am and, I won’t tell you” policy.
Rather than formulate an opinion when I don’t know where this line of thought is going, let me ask questions instead: 1. What is the action to attack the conservatives called for, that is, what form will it take? 2. Will this not just immediately make us look like leftists in the minds of the sheeple and unawake individuals? 3. Will this divide WNs, along left leaning and rightists? There are huge chasms of differences in our factions. It would be easier for left WNs to go along with right WNs, than the other way around. You know the route that these differences takes: Abortion versus no abortion, religion versus no-religion, free-sex versus promotion of filial units, shoot fags versus don’t ask don’t tell, allow a few quiet Jews versus ban them all. These are polarizing issues that won’t go away. We cannot tilt against the right, and we may be seen as doing this if we attack ‘Conservatives’. I know how phony many of the leaders of that movement are, but you have to look at how the followers in that movement feel. These followers are the ones we seek to soften up. After all, how many of the left can we convert that are buying Obama’s policies hook line and sinker? A WN converting an obamabot? How likely is that? 4. In the mainstream, there are only two political circles, right and left. If we attack conservatives (publicly identified in the right) then we will be identified by millions as leftists. It is the old ‘if you’re not one of them, then you’re one of those’ routine. The non-racialist leftists will not want anything to do with us, they will excoriate us. At least some rightists and conservatives lean our way. When I talk about ‘softening up’ people, I acknowledge that we will not be able to convert everybody, or even most Whites. There will be a great sea of Sheeple that we control but will not agree with us explicitly. We ‘soften them up’ with our message, by exposing them to it, they likely will not accept it until we achieve military rule over them. Then they will gulp it down as it is mother’s milk, with barely a grumble. This phenomenon happens because they worship authority and are led along this route even to their doom, which we rescue them from by winning the battles and SHTF CIV war. Many of the best co-operationists will be from the conservative and so-called moderate set. We will need at least their passing good will, at least where they will not oppose us during the SHTF Rev. As you can see, I see the WN coming after a catalyst such as a grinding Depression, followed by SHTF events and mass insurrections. Once a few insurrections start, it emboldens many others. There are guys falling over themselves within the Patriot movement to get a ‘change’ going of their own, but the watchword is, don’t be the first. This may sound pussy, but these guys are not suicidal. ZOG can smash little groups all day long. But the Beast cannot stop multiple insurrections, especially when it loses the Moral High Ground. What is that, the Moral High Ground? It’s the sense of purpose, agrievement and righteous indignation that all men have to have, to take on the gargantuan task of rebelling. I say to myself, if the Patriots and WNs have not rebelled yet, have not started the rev, it’s because I, and my Brother propagandists, have not given them enough reason to be indignant. It is up to the Propagandists of the movement to lead the WN cadres forward. Embedment: I cannot stress this enough, that the Patriot movement is soo much larger than our WN movement. The Patriots, to be sure, are not so racialist. An example would be that they’ll tell a racist joke, but have a neighbor they like who is a minority. They just cannot bring themselves to think the unthinkable. So what do we do in that regard. It would be so easy to write the guy off, call him a mud shark, etc.. Why? Are we crazy? We use him as a stepping stone, his forces outnumber ours, and they are CONSERVATIVE. I have advocated in the past we embed within the Patriot movement, as many WNs already are doing, to enhance our power when the ZOG beast makes a mistake and overplays his hand. This is very important, as it will give us the power we need at the proper SHTF time. We simply convert these forces from within, during SHTF/Rev. Our military leaders will have to cultivate political officers, most of whom fight as well, and they will have to be doing this morning noon and night. There is no room at the top for lazy people, whether mentally sluggish or physically. A WN military leader, during SHTF, must never give in to torpor or fear, his head will barely hit the bunk and he will be up again, training, strategizing, acting, making decisions. I know that is what I will be looking for in the man that I follow or promote. Energy, fearlessness, attention to didactics and ideology, a good head on his shoulders, and the ability to inspire. What is that, ‘the ability to inspire’? Irwin Rommel once said something that epitomizes leadership: “Be an example to your men, in your duty and in private life. Never spare yourself, and let the troops see that you don't in your endurance of fatigue and privation. Always be tactful and well-mannered and teach your subordinates to do the same. Avoid excessive sharpness or harshness of voice, which usually indicates the man who has shortcomings of his own to hide.” We cannot spare the movement, the precious movement, from our best efforts to become this man. We have it in us to better ourselves, to inspire our Brothers, each and every one of us. He also aid this: “Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, and brains saves both.” Forget Sun Tzu, give me more Rommel. I know it is difficult perhaps to contemplate some newly awakened guy, one who has just turned on to WN’ism, to tell him it’s okay to embed with conservative and ‘Patriot’ militia. We are afraid for him, we are worried he’ll leave us and settle down into comfortable conservatism, after all it pays more than the life of a WN any day, you know it and I know it. Solution: Training. We have to be better trainers and reach out to other, lesser skilled propagandists. Strengthen these lesser experienced ones. Form groups that teach out of the Army intelligence manuals, Propaganda Manuals, teach proper didactics, encourage people to increase their skills in didactics and speaking. We will have to bring our appeal to these conservative people. Think about it, let’s put ourselves in the chair of a WN general, during the rev. You are a General commanding defensive forces, trying to defend the new WN. It’s only just appeared above the level of whispers, in fact, sometimes you think that’s all it really is. Your men move about in communities that are not WN, most in fact are not. You see minorities here and there in your territories, but since you have not won yet, you can do nothing. “That will have to wait until after victory”, you ruminate, “first things are first”. Yet the Masses, in their homes and shops, do not rebel against you, which allows you to concentrate on the border with ZOG. If you had the border to contend with, as well as ma restless sheeple population, you would not have the forces to handle it all, ZOG would soon overrun you. Yet you remember that you did not attack the sheeple’s values before the Rev, you left them their conservative illusions. Now, in this hectic time of revolution, they do not particularly care for you, but they do not oppose you. Your men can move about freely in their territory. Many in the sheeple territory actually are starting to help you. You, the General, have trained Political Officers, who in turn, have trained propaganda agents, who go around helping the masses with their problems. If there is a broken sewage pipe in a community, one of these men will find a solution. Food shortage in an area, and, no the officer won’t shit cabbage, but he’ll help teach the people how to lay down gardens, and what’s involved. If a food shortage is on the horizon, we warn the sheeple about it, in fact we always tell them the truth. We become all things to all the White masses. As the tough times of the military struggle ensues, the bond between the ruled and the rulers becomes tighter. They will start to see our love for them and, despite us treating them like children, they will soon look to our guidance more and more. Just like they did with the conservatives or whatever political party they looked to Pre-Revolution. Conservatives have a hazy image of being the Values party, despite us knowing that is not totally true. Let’s not be looked on as the anti-values people. |
August 11th, 2009 | #7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm like the left: I believe almost all whites really are racists, they're just too cowardly to acknowledge it. But circumstances make the man. It's one thing to tippy-type on the twaddlenet, it's another thing to face a violent, fast-changing situation. Quote:
Moral high ground is a concept for losers to justify inaction or losing. Defending yourself and your family requires no intellectual defense. If it's not marrow-evident to a white man, then truly he belongs underground with the rest of the 99% of species that ever existed, now extinct. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Look at this forum. Look at how it is designed. Look at the rules. Look how we encourage posters to act. Look at the specific things we discourage. All these tend in one direction, to produce the kind of man best able to further the cause of defending Whites and defeating the jewish tyranny. |
||||||||||||||||||
August 11th, 2009 | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
|
LOL. I like those options! Either one would be fine by me.
How about shrinking the bounds of this debate like you did the fag one to "no abortion at all versus no abortions on demand"?
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history. http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/ |
August 11th, 2009 | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
|
Well, I don't know that our goal should be to try to convert anyone, whether liberal or conservative, but most WN's and most leftists can at least agree on one major issue -- that these wars for Israel (from a WN perspective) or for oil/big business/U.S. Imperialism (from the leftist perspective) need to end.
I expect that most WN's and most leftists would also agree that these big media cartels are a problem, though they wouldn't agree on the exact nature of the problem, with the WN's seeing the media as jewish-controlled and the leftists seeing it as corporate-controlled.
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history. http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/ |
August 11th, 2009 | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,591
|
Quote:
There's probably a number of people involved in the patriot movement that already see things our way (even if they're not fully conscious of it) but don't know we exist. Those people don't need to be converted; they need to be informed that there's an alternative (us).
__________________
The jewish tribe is the cancer of human history. http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/ |
|
August 11th, 2009 | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 643
|
I look forward to reading that. "Gateway" is the typical justification for milquetoast organizations and philosophies, e.g. Stormfront and Amren. In the past I've rationalized so-called gateways as a step in the right direction. However, in reality these things are more often a diversion or pressure relief valve.
|
April 17th, 2012 | #12 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
One day I just googled "zionist media" and read Pierce's "Who Rules America?". At that point, I had no idea of the massive crisis in Europe regarding demographics, so everything started to hit pretty hard soon after. There were no conservative voices that had a message to inspire me to go and look for those facts. Linder, did you ever write the essay concerning gateways? I will search for it. |
|
July 17th, 2013 | #13 |
Celebrating My Diversity
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
|
Bump due to Derek Black's recent public, SPLC-facilitated crimethink confession.
The 'big tent' (little integrity) model of White politics is a laughable failure. Or, to paraphrase Mr. Miyagi, when you walk down the middle of the road, you get squish, like grape. |
September 17th, 2013 | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,536
|
brilliant
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
conservatism, faileoconservative, false opposition, patriotards, strategy |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|