|
February 6th, 2008 | #1 |
Administrator
|
Jews Behind Sexualization of Kids
Sexualizing children at ever-earlier ages makes money for jewish toymakers and retailers. Turning your daughter into a slut is "good for jews." Good business and good politics. So is race mixing. Both of these highly undesirable, anti-White behaviors are promoted by a line of dolls called "Bratz" created by a filthy jew named Issac Larian.
Bratz Toymaker Isaac Larian living the American Dream Exclusive Iranian Jewish Chronicle Interview Since 2001, the line of children’s toy dolls known as “Bratz” with their cultural diversity, disproportionately large heads, large lips, and trendy fashions have become one of the most popular toys in the country, if not the world. The brainchild behind the “Bratz” brand is Isaac Larian, an Iranian Jewish businessman whose his rags to riches story could be straight out of a Hollywood movie. In fact a live action movie based on the Bratz dolls was released earlier this year with the DVD of the movie to be released on November 27th. Larian has become one of the growing number of successful self-made businessmen in the Iranian Jewish community. While his company MGA Entertainment has since grown to become the third largest toymaker in the world, Larian has not forgotten his humble beginnings in Iran. If you want your child to grow up happy and normal, White parent, the jew is your worst enemy. Because it's not just race-mixing 'ho' dolls the jew shoves in front of your daughter's face, it's nasty television shows, too. The Bratz multiculturalism leads seamlessly into the multicultural programming on tap at Nickelodeon, the channel most watched by White girls under 12, and then MTV, the most-watched channel by White girls aged 13-24. Both Nickelodeon and MTV are channels owned by Viacom, which itself is owned by a jew named Sumner Redstone. Original name: Murray Rothstein. When you see white girls with mixed babies in the mall or the grocery story, it's because they've succumbed to years of media images promoting colored males as desirable. But when they go down that route, these girls destroy their lives. Multiracial relationships do not work. They almost always fall apart, and White girls in mixed relationship are far likelier to be victims of violence. In a world devoted to what's good for women, isn't it strange that these facts are never brought up? Not when you understand the agenda. The jew perceives Whites as threats to his power, and he does whatever he can to disrupt Normal White America. Bratz is just one instance of his evil pandering to the most naive and vulnerable among us - our White daughters. Last edited by Alex Linder; February 6th, 2008 at 12:50 AM. |
March 30th, 2008 | #2 |
WN Mother
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,469
|
Thanks for this post Alex. I have noticed the Bratz dolls for some time. Way before I moved to Ireland and before I had my daughter. I believe these toys started around 'Barbie.' When I was a young girl I remember my ex step-mother would always try to push me into playing with Barbie, but I never did. I would toss her and her 'gay looking bf Ken' aside while I played with Care Bears, Cabbage Patch Kids (I loved Cabbage Pail Kids cards), and I played with GJ Joes with my young brother, etc. I remember I had 9 shelves in my room full of these dolls my ex stepmom would egg forth onto me, which I never touched so they sat there collecting dust. Now if you take a look at Barbie dolls, they are as bad as Bratz. Didn't they make nigger barbie's too? And nigger boys for Barbie to 'play' with? I remember she would constantly try to dress me up all 'pretty,' in her terms and I hated that too. I didn't like wearing dresses everyday, I liked getting dirty. ALL GIRLS DO. That is what mothers fail to comprehend. No 3 or 4 year old girl is sitting there worrying about her hair, but rather how many bugs she can dig up outside.
Anyways, I was out with my fiancee and daughter the other day and went into a local store here to pick up some milk, when we had past a large section of 'bratz' dolls and materials and binders and all that hocus pocus. This was directly in front of the checkout counter so all the little girls would be pleading with mommy dearest to purchase them more whorish, niggerish merchandise. I boldly stated, as I past by and loud, "I will never by you (my daughter) these kind of 'girl toys.'" I was holding her in my arms as we past by. And then looked at my fiancee and said I will not purchase this bs for her. If anyone ever decides to buy her anything remotely like this or barbie or anything that will polute her mind into being a bimbo or race traitor I will throw back in their face. No matter who it is that purchases these things for her. Girls do not need thousands of dolls. By them one or two cute little dolls or teddy bears or something and let them run around and play outside. That is what I loved doing. Always outside playing in the dirt with my brother and neighborhood friends, or swimming. I use to swim everyday. Loved it. There is no need to fork over a million bucks on material that will only deteriorate her mind and by the age of 8 will make her hate her body.
__________________
jews do NOT deserve to have the letter 'j' capitalized, not even if it is the first word of a sentence. |
March 30th, 2008 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: naples
Posts: 11,142
|
(Note: Tesco is a jew-owned company - brutus)
DAILYMAIL Tesco condemned for selling pole dancing toy by COLIN FERNANDEZ 24th October 2006 pole dance game family Mother of two Karen Gallimore was searching for Christmas gifts for her two daughters, Laura 10, and Sarah, 11, when she came across the 'toy' Tesco has been forced to remove a pole-dancing kit from the toys and games section of its website after it was accused of "destroying children's innocence". The Tesco Direct site advertises the kit with the words, "Unleash the sex kitten inside...simply extend the Peekaboo pole inside the tube, slip on the sexy tunes and away you go! "Soon you'll be flaunting it to the world and earning a fortune in Peekaboo Dance Dollars". The £49.97 kit comprises a chrome pole extendible to 8ft 6ins, a 'sexy dance garter' and a DVD demonstrating suggestive dance moves. The kit, condemned as 'extremely dangerous' by family campaigners yesterday, was discovered by mother of two Karen Gallimore who was searching for Christmas gifts for her two daughters, Laura 10, and Sarah, 11. Mrs Gallimore, 33, of Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, said yesterday: "I'm no prude, but any children can go on there and see it. It's just not on." Dr Adrian Rogers, of family campaigning group Family Focus said yesterday that the kit would "destroy children's lives". He said: "Tesco is Britain's number one chain, this is extremely dangerous. It is an open invitation to turn the youngest children on to sexual behaviour. "This will be sold to four, five and six-year olds. This is a most dangerous toy that will contribute towards destroying children's innocence." He added: "Children are being encouraged to dance round a pole which is interpreted in the adult world as a phallic symbol. "It ought to be stopped, it really requires the intervention of members of Parliament. This should only be available to the most depraved people who want to corrupt their children." Tesco today agreed to remove the product from the Toy section of the site, but said it will remain on sale as a Fitness Accessory, despite the fact that the product description invites users to "unleash the sex kitten inside". Also on sale on the Tesco website is a strip poker game, "Peekaboo Poker" which is illustrated by a picture of a reclining woman in underwear. The card game is is described as a game that "risks the risque and brings a whole lot of naughtiness to the table. "Played with a unique pack of Peekaboo Boy and Girl playing cards, the aim of the game is to win as many Peekaboo chips as possible and turn them into outrageously naughty fun." The pole dance kit is the latest item to fuel allegations that major retailers increasingly sell products which "sexualise" young children such as T-shirts with suggestive messages. In recent years Asda was forced to remove from sale pink and black lace lingerie, including a push-up bra to girls as young as nine. Next had to remove t-shirts on sale for girls as young as six with the slogan "so many boys, so little time." And BHS and others came under fire for selling padded bras embellished with a "Little Miss Naughty" logo and t-shirts with a Playboy-style bunny that said "I love boys...They are stupid." Tesco last night denied the pole dancing kit was sexually oriented and said it was clearly marked for "adult use". A spokesman added: "Pole dancing is an increasing exercise craze. This item is for people who want to improve their fitness and have fun at the same time." http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/...n_page_id=1770
__________________
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
|
March 30th, 2008 | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: in a gene near you
Posts: 4,982
|
|
March 30th, 2008 | #5 | |||||
WN Mother
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,469
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I shop at Tesco's but I also shop at two other stores here. I go to 3 different damn stores because each thing I purchase is cheaper at one store than another. I went into Tesco's once and looked at the small section of baby cloths. I saw t-shirts for 6 - 9 month old girls with sayings on them that no women alive should ever wear. I should have made a scene then. Next time I will.
__________________
jews do NOT deserve to have the letter 'j' capitalized, not even if it is the first word of a sentence. Last edited by Summer; March 30th, 2008 at 05:08 PM. |
|||||
March 30th, 2008 | #6 |
WN Mother
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,469
|
And I bet if I did make a scene here, they would all tell me to get the hell out of their country, because I am nothing but a 'yankee' to them, since they all seem to love whores here and do not see a problem with this crap.
__________________
jews do NOT deserve to have the letter 'j' capitalized, not even if it is the first word of a sentence. |
May 28th, 2008 | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
|
The Tribe
Sundance-awarded documentary THE TRIBE - how jews invented Barbie. Barbie is jewish! chortle jews. Clips beggar belief.
http://www.tribethefilm.com/about.html From Barbie to Bratz. Note how it all comes from jews. http://www.frankwbaker.com/little_hotties.htm Jews encouraging White women to be childless whores. Start 'em early. First Barbie/Bratz. Then MTV miscegenation. Then "Sex and the City." |
August 6th, 2008 | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
S&M Barbie doll.
http://podblanc.com/node/23521 |
August 6th, 2008 | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jewnited States -Usrael
Posts: 210
|
Gee,I guess Kikes want them to start early on business, huh? |
August 15th, 2008 | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...s-Dive-In.html
Outrage at High School Musical knickers [panties] for young girls emblazoned with the words 'Dive In' By Emily Andrews Last updated at 7:12 PM on 13th August 2008 [Jew owned]Disney has sparked outrage by producing High School Musical pants for young girls with the suggestive words 'Dive In' emblazoned across them. The underwear, part of the hugely successful movie's range of merchandise, has also been criticised by the NSPCC. The packs of knickers are on sale in Asda, where Sue Ralph unwittingly bought some for her seven-year-old granddaughter in the Broadstairs, Kent, store. When she got home she was shocked to see the 'sexually suggestive' wording printed on them. Mrs Ralph, 57, a civil servant, said: 'I bought the packet of five multi-coloured knickers. Because they are in a packet, you can't see the writing "Dive In" on them. 'I was extremely shocked when I saw what was on them and I don't believe Disney or anyone else is so stupid not to realise the implications of the wording they chose. 'You let your children watch all these programmes, which are innocent and nice. 'But the merchandising that runs alongside them is the complete opposite. It's sexually suggestive, inappropriate and wholeheartedly wrong in some cases. 'And it is fiercely competitive among the children to look trendy and have the latest fashion. 'Parents are being put in an extremely difficult position and something must be done. 'It just seems like these companies do not answer to anyone and can print whatever they like.' Disney's High School Musical has been one of the most popular films of the decade for children and young teenagers, and has spawned a multi-million pound merchandising range. The NSPCC said: 'This is part of a worrying trend of inappropriate clothing marketed at young children.' Mrs Ralph added: ''I think it is inappropriate because you just never know who could be out and about and see that and just think it was a bit too enticing for a young child to be wearing. 'I would like to see all the products removed from the shelves.' The National Union for Teachers is equally alarmed. Spokesman Doug Macari, who has been a teacher for 17 years, said: 'Our union is very concerned about the increasing sexualisation of children. 'Companies are telling children what to wear and what to eat purely for financial gain - they want to make a profit from children. 'The NUT has even drawn up a charter, Growing Up In A Material World, which addresses this issue. 'We want retailers to take more responsibility for the items they sell and if they don't, for the Government to get involved in this issue. 'Schools are doing their best to clamp down on their behaviour policies. They are having to be much more rigid about uniform.' He added: 'Certainly sexual harassment of children, by other children, and discussion of sexual behaviour - with girls in particular - is one way in which girls and boys can bully each other. 'This is a issue which I doubt the makers of the underwear have even considered.' A Disney spokeswoman said: 'We are very sorry to hear that a customer is unhappy with one of our High School Musical products and apologise for any offence caused. 'The knickers in question were designed using our High School Musical 2 artwork, which uses the creative theme of a swimming pool, as this is a key part of the film's storyline. 'Unfortunately a genuine oversight was made and the text on this product was used outside the context of the swimming pool. This product will not be part of any forthcoming collections.' Marks & Spencer also sell a High School Musical range, including a slogan-free underwear set. Asda, who are selling the controversial High School Musical knickers for £4 for a pack of five, said it did not mean to cause offence. A spokesman said: 'The design on the High School Musical underwear was approved by Disney and taken from their style guide'. |
August 19th, 2008 | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 1,317
|
I don't have an image of it, but last year Target was selling little girls swimsuits with hula dancers, palm trees, and grass huts with a door, with various phrases. Innocent looking enough, right? They were cute, and I almost bought one until I realized they expressed a perverted message.
Every single swim suit had the print strategically placed so that the little hut and door with the captions "Secret Place" (or something similar) would be printed over the vagina of the little girl wearing it. I wish I had made more noise about that back then. With the constant onslaught of depravity I know I don't get 1/2 as mad about things as I should. |
August 19th, 2008 | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,278
|
Quote:
__________________
"You can check out any time you want, but you can never leave" |
|
August 23rd, 2008 | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 140
|
Ugly sick bastards they are and all done for a profit.
My daughter was very keen on the Bratz doll's, but I didn't show my dislike at the multi racial features. Didn't want to upset the apple cart at the time. Although, I did tell her around her early teens that the one thing that would make me very unhappy indeed, would be to see her dangling from the arm of a dark skinned boyfriend, even if he was only slightly tanned from foreign blood. It make me sick to the back teeth to see white girls pushing a niglet around town and in some areas, there's quite a concentration. Thankfully it's not really the norm. People do tent to stay amongst their own racial groupings, but inner cities tend to dehumanise their community members who in turn express a selfish attitude of, 'I dont care'... 'you only live once, so make the best of it'...'look after number one' as well as being more concerned at making money. Females have a more empathic, caring nature and are easier to beguile and influence. Those sick bastards who dream up these kids toys have no conscience and knowingly sow the seeds of racial death, amongst the most vulnerable of our white citizens. Our white daughters!!! |
August 23rd, 2008 | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,705
|
Quote:
Sick. My wife bought some underwear for our daughter (5), with picture of butterfly on it. A butterfly looks like vagina being spread open. |
|
August 23rd, 2008 | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
yeesh, that's a stretch!
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
August 23rd, 2008 | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
|
August 23rd, 2008 | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
I seen one from the inside out. thankfully I was too young to remember it.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
August 28th, 2008 | #18 |
Why are JEWS at my table?
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 1,526
|
Anytime one looks under the slimiest pond rock they will see some filthy kike face peeking out. Disgusting race of subhuman scum kikes are.
Why don't they make dolls that look like ugly fat kike women? Call the doll line JAPS. Hopefully they don't forget the Moo Moo's and the 25 feline husband replacements. |
August 29th, 2008 | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,109
|
|
January 24th, 2013 | #20 |
Administrator
|
To Be A Girl In This Culture
By Rod Dreher • January 24, 2013, 1:10 PM Allison Pearson delivers some grim news: A friend’s daughter recently started at a highly regarded boarding school. When her mother asked how she was enjoying the mixed-sex environment, the girl said quietly: “You have to give the boys oral sex or they get cross.” Reeling with shock, the mum protested that her darling daughter did not have to do anything of the sort. “Oh yes you do,” replied the girl. “And you have to shave down there or the boys don’t like it.” The girl in question is not some brazen, street-smart sixth-former; she is 14 years old. With a woman’s body, perhaps, but still a child. A child who, as far as her parents were concerned, was leading a sheltered middle-class life, not auditioning to become a professional footballer’s WAG. Teenagers have always had secrets, places where they go to try on their new selves, be it the pages of a padlocked diary or the back row of the movies. But mine is the first generation of parents that has to protect its young not just in the world we can see and hear, but in a parallel, online universe for which we barely know the password. And it’s really tough. Tougher even than we know. More: Only last week, we heard the awful story of Chevonea Kendall-Bryan, who fell to her death after pleading with a boy on the pavement below to erase the recording of her performing a sex act on him. “How much can I handle? HONESTLY. I beg you, delete that,” texted Chevonea. She was 13. Thirty years ago, keeping your kids safe was a doddle. The nearest your average boy got to pornography was a contraband Playboy, which looks as quaint and charming as The Country Diary of an Edwardian Lady next to websites such as YouPorn. Those of us who squiggled I LOVE STEVE on the back of our hands in biro in 1975 will struggle to comprehend that girls are now encouraged to write a boy’s name on their naked breast, take a picture of it and text it to their inamorato. “Not my daughter!” I hear you cry. Really, are you quite sure about that? According to Perry, half of all teenagers regularly see pornography and a third of children have received a sexually explicit text or email. If your dear son is consulting YouPorn on his mobile, then, believe me, he will have some pretty strange ideas about the act of physical lovemaking. I spent three minutes looking at YouPorn yesterday and I felt like I needed at least three years in a darkened room listening to the B minor Mass to reconstitute my soul. What the hell would this writhing abyss look like to a 14-year-old who has never seen a penis? And: In his timely new book, Raising Girls, [Steve] Biddulph says that about five years ago (around the time that sexting and camera-phones were taking off) psychologists began to notice a marked and sudden plunge in girls’ mental health. The average teenage female was “stressed and depressed in a way never seen before”. Girls were growing up too fast, much faster than their mothers had. Our 18 is their 14, our 14 is their 10. Mainstream media has made porn-inspired sex seem compulsory for girls at ever younger ages. “So what?” says the liberal parent who doesn’t think it’s cool to challenge their child’s lifestyle choices, and may secretly envy them. Biddulph has harsh words for these hands-off mummies and daddies: “Having your daughter as a friend – so much easier than actually raising her,” he mocks. Read the whole thing. I’m very glad we homeschool, and our kids aren’t exposed to the worst of this, but I’m under no illusions that we don’t have a difficult job ahead of us in terms of building in resistance to porn in our children’s character. Still, as I said the other day, I worry about marriage prospects for my children among a generation of their peers who will have been stunted and deformed by pornography habits. http://www.theamericanconservative.c...-this-culture/ |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|