|
March 31st, 2009 | #141 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In your head
Posts: 5,325
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
March 31st, 2009 | #142 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In your head
Posts: 5,325
|
Dickhead? I though you liked dickheads.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 31st, 2009 | #143 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
No, I crush them in debates.
Quote:
As far as I know the simple analysis I provided was correct for an infinitely rigid springboard and a few other basic assumptions. If you want to revive the thread so you can point out the error of my ways be my guest.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
|
March 31st, 2009 | #144 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In your head
Posts: 5,325
|
Georgie Porgie doesn't know the English language. All Georgie Porgie can do is to appeal to the masses, and to authority, both of them logical fallacies. You see, if he did know something of the English language, he would know that "such as I" is an abbreviated form of "such as I am", and that "such as me", as it is commonly ("such as me" does have an archaic use) used is a nonsense.
It is a simple matter to settle from first principles, being that, since the object of the clause is individuals, not you, nor I, there is no reason to use the object pronoun me. Does Georgie still deny that "for individuals such as I am" is correct? Would Georgie write, "for individuals such I know" or, "for individuals such as me know"? Eh, Georgie? "She asked me for the gift me had bought her", eh, Georgie? Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 31st, 2009 | #145 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In your head
Posts: 5,325
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 31st, 2009 | #146 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
Quote:
Too retarded to waste my time on. Sandor I have lost all respect for your intellectual abilities. vapid airhead.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
|
March 31st, 2009 | #147 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
|
notice he isn't going into specifics. To everyone: he is a fraud, an airhead. That is all.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan |
March 31st, 2009 | #148 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
|
|
April 1st, 2009 | #149 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
April 1st, 2009 | #151 |
The paranormal silent type
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 8,265
|
Coprovore?
__________________
|
April 1st, 2009 | #152 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
I respect conventional spelling more than most - in its sphere. |
|
April 1st, 2009 | #154 |
Administrator
|
|
April 1st, 2009 | #155 | |
drinking tea
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
|
Quote:
I like Cummings' Grasshopper and I don't think he was a gimmick. Even if he was, so what? I like the poem and and I'm not going to be a pretentious twat and try and explain why. I like what I like. Reading poetry in silence? Don't see what difference it makes, as long as I enjoy it but I don't actually read that much poetry. I just like Grasshopper.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote. |
|
April 1st, 2009 | #157 | ||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
April 1st, 2009 | #158 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Your apparent anger at Lasher is understandable in view of the way He has been slapping you around (in a gentlemanly way), but try not to become too rabid in your frustration, or you may pop an important blood vessel. Lasher isn't exactly sure what a "negro receiver" is, but if it is what He suspects, then you would probably have more knowledge about that subject than Lash. You, sir, seem to have a real problem getting along with those who aren't your close sycophants, and Lash will understand if you decide to silence Him. |
|
April 1st, 2009 | #159 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
|
April 1st, 2009 | #160 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 216
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|