Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old November 29th, 2005 #1
Geoff Beck
Hammer
 
Geoff Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harz Mountains
Posts: 1,551
Geoff Beck
Default #1-12 of The Truth Is No Defense

Premier Broadcast: The Truth Is No Defense

Listen Here (mp3 | 00:05:04)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2...B/gbttind1.mp3

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

Welcome to the Broadcast, I'm Geoff Beck

November 30, 2005

If I was being prosecuted for "holocaust denial" I'd like think I'd simply tell the prosecutor to shove it, and consider the matter finished. Well, I’ve never seen the inside of jail nor I have been prosecuted for thought crimes as is Historian David Irving who on Nov 25th was picked up by Austrian police on a 26 year old arrest warrant for questioning the Jew’s holocaust story.

Then days later the other shoe dropped a confession, or perhaps a recantation, or was it as the Guardian newspaper reported a ”repentance.” The full details are not known. But I wouldn't put too much credence in jailhouse confessions, despite the cackling by the Jews and their hired hands. We all know that thousands of Americans confess to crimes which they have not committed, the so called "plea bargain" process. We are told this is done to streamline an overworked justice system. But surely many innocents must also confess to crimes, if only to escape the clutches of the legal gulag system; all confessions especially by political prisoners, which Irving surely is, and which also affect Jewish concerns are to be greeted with great skepticism.

Indeed when it comes to the Jews and their concerns skepticism is the watchword. In the Fall and Winter of 1932 - 33 the late Malcolm Muggeridge was touring Russia reporting for the Manchester Guardian. The reports he sent home to Britain were not being well received, many were censored. You see he was telling the truth about the famine which the Jew Lazar Kaganovich supervised in the Ukraine. You might say Muggeridge was the 1930s version of a Holocaust denier.

After his reports exposing the Ukrainian holocaust Muggeridge lost his job. In 1934 he wrote a book lampooning uncritical Western journalists entitled "Winter In Moscow." In this very year, 71 years after the first publication of "Winter In Moscow" that book is still being denounced as "anti-Semitic."

Today the Jews have considerable power but not as much as they had in Bolshevik Russia; it’s been decades since they've been able send writers and historians to their deaths in gulags of Kolyma or Pechora. Still, they are hardly toothless, and my guess is they've had their eyes on Irving for some time. Irving, it must be noted, is not the most vocal and aggressive of WWII revisionists, but his writings are well known and that is the reason he must be discredited.

The Jews first attack against Irving came when Deborah Lipstadt published a book suggesting Irving had denied the Holocaust, a libel case ensued. In that case David Irving defended himself. In contrast the Jews poured millions of dollars into the legal case against him. In the year 2000 Irving was found guilty, after the trial he remarked:

"The leaders of the Jewish communities around the world have used the most horrific methods to try and destroy me. They had bottomless pockets to afford justice and say go ahead and destroy that bastard -- which they just did."

I suggest readers locate Mark Weber's review of the Lipstadt-Irving trial entitled: Judge Gray's Harsh But Predictable Ruling.

However satisfying a legal judgment against Irving was it is not enough. Confessions have an impact which legal judgments don't, the Jews learned this long ago in Bolshevik Russia. The well respected court historian Robert Conquest notes that a public confession has a demoralizing effect on other skeptics and opponents of the regime in power. Defendants which confess forever discredit themselves and often their fellow opponents. In lieu of death camps and outright executions confessions are most effective instrument for silencing opposition.

Keep an eye out for David Irving and be sure to read his books, many are available free online. Decide for yourself whether David Irving is a good or bad historian, don't let the controlled media make the decision for you.

Thankyou for listening.
 
Old November 29th, 2005 #2
Stan Sikorski
Bannished
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Upper midwest around cattle.
Posts: 3,457
Stan Sikorski
Default

:cheers: Welcome to the VNN Broadcasting Family Geoff!

Another White Man joins the voice of freedom - VNN Radio. Who is next?
 
Old December 5th, 2005 #3
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Antiochus Epiphanes
Default

Nice to have a short item like this. Pretty reasonable too. Gateway stuff. Thanks Geoff!
 
Old December 5th, 2005 #4
Geoff Beck
Hammer
 
Geoff Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harz Mountains
Posts: 1,551
Geoff Beck
Default A few more taped

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
Nice to have a short item like this. Pretty reasonable too. Gateway stuff. Thanks Geoff!
Oh, you're welcome.

A couple more have been recorded, the first on Kevin MacDonald's book Separation and Its Discontents and the second on teaching history. Both ought to appear in December.
 
Old December 6th, 2005 #5
Stan Sikorski
Bannished
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Upper midwest around cattle.
Posts: 3,457
Stan Sikorski
Default



Visit Mr. Beck's page for his latest broadcasts and transcripts:

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2...NB/gbttind.htm
 
Old December 7th, 2005 #6
Chain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Geoff, I listened to your new show early this morning when I was about to keel over from lack of sleep. I learned a lot of detailed facts I hadn't known, and your presentation is quite professional. Glad VNN's media is increasing almost weekly. Then Stan said you have next week's show ready. Just go twice-weekly. More!

Stan did a fine job on the music picks too-- at least, I guess those are his music picks.

I hope "The Truth Is No Defense" can fit onto podcasts. It seems like they may. Judeo studies from the Aryan viewpoint, and you don't even have to attend David Duke's Ukranian University! Aryans are taking up the study of Jewry as surely as they have analyzed us for millennia.
 
Old December 7th, 2005 #7
Geoff Beck
Hammer
 
Geoff Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harz Mountains
Posts: 1,551
Geoff Beck
Default Your comments

Thanks Chain, your comments mean a lot to me. Your activism, as well as Rounder's motivated me to do something. This is one of the ways I know how to contribute to the movement.

As for this newest Truth is No Defense broadcast (#2) I have to thank Kevin MacDonald. When I first read MacDonald's "Culture of Critique" I nearly vomited, the material was so shocking. I realized then the depth of Jewish ethnocentrism and their predominant role in radical political and social movements. MacDonald is, as you've said, Chain, "the John Locke of our age."

Oh, and Stan to deserves so much credit for helping to bring the production to life.
 
Old December 7th, 2005 #8
Geoff Beck
Hammer
 
Geoff Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harz Mountains
Posts: 1,551
Geoff Beck
Default The Truth Is No Defense #2 Online

The Truth is No Defense: 12/06/2005 #2

Listen Here The Truth is No Defense: 12/06/2005 #2 (mp3 | 00:12:09)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2...NB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

December 6, 2005

Welcome to the Broadcast, I’m Geoff Beck

If you’ve read Kevin MacDonald’s “A Culture of Critique” (CofC) then you may remember Table 1 which contrasts cultural norms of Europeans with those of Jews: differences ranging from kinship and family systems to moral and intellectual grounding. One might generalize from this graph and say Europeans are more individualist than Jews, and this is an important generalization, one that needs to be understood. So, before proceeding with MacDonald’s research I’d like to briefly speak about this phenomenon of individualism.

It is true that whites are more individualists than Jews, but I’d like to also suggest the present state of our people, which might be described as hyper individualist, is not a natural state. There are many reasons for this dangerous state we’ve been led to, but I’d like to consider one reason in particular: the vulnerability of the individual before an organized group; particularly an organized group which controls opinion forming media: this group being the Jews:

Quote:
“The individual is placed in a minority position and burdened at the same time with a total responsibility. Such conditions make an individualist society fertile ground for modern propaganda. The permanent uncertainty, the social mobility, and the absence of sociological protection and of traditional frames of reference all these provide propaganda with a malleable environment? [so that the individual] can be fed information and conditioned at will.”
So wrote Jacques Ellul in his book Propaganda

With that in mind let’s return to MacDonald. The CofC is a well known book, but in this broadcast I’d like to talk about another of MacDonald’s books, the second in his trilogy documenting Jewish ethnocentrism entitled “Separation and Its Discontents” (SAID). The key to understanding his research is to recognize the collective behavior of groups, and not specific individuals which compromise them: it’s the looking at the entire forest and not a tree. This is often very difficult for our people, not because we lack the innate ability; but rather this critical thinking skill has been systematically suppressed by propaganda from the media; by the government through laws; and by the schools through social conditioning.

When criticizing Jews many counter by citing the accomplishments of such and such doctor, or such and such scientist, redirecting the issue of group accountability unto specific individuals. Whether the cited accomplishments are legitimate or not the question is whether the aggregate effect of organized Jewry upon gentile society is harmful.

European Ethnocentrism, however muted when compared to other groups, was not so long ago a favored characteristic among our kind. If one examines our history from antiquity to WWII one can discover strong in-group and out-group distinctions. My grandmother told me that her brother dragged a Negro off a Houston streetcar and pushed him into the street for sitting in the wrong section of the car. Society in the 1920s expected white men to defend their interests, and keep the blacks under control.

Though, it’s important to place this subject of individualism, collectivism and ethnic interests in a much larger context. European society during the medieval period was organized not along the principle of individualism but was a collective body with numerous layers of hierarchical stratification: a hierarchy with each link in the social stratification owing obligation to those above and assistance to those below. This collective organization of European society, commonly known as the feudal system, endured for a millennium blunting the Muslim invasion and keeping the Jews segregated. Medieval life was very different than our own, but it was a life rich in meaning, and if you’ve traveled Europe and visited the mighty cathedrals and castles one can grasp their high level of accomplishment.

The development of medieval society is connected to the hip with the Catholic Church. But how did this church form? In SAID MacDonald gives special attention to the rise of the early church, with particular emphasis on conflicts between the Christianity and Judaism:
Quote:
“the Christian church in late antiquity was in its very essence the embodiment of a powerful anti-Semitic movement that arose because of gentile concern with resource and reproductive competition with Jews... “
Later he explains that National Socialism in Germany also rose as a response to Jewish ethnocentrism - more on that later.

Today's Christian Zionists might be shocked to learn the early Church fathers were vehement anti-Semites: Eusebius, St, John Chrysotom, St. Cyril, St. Jerome, St. Augustine, and St. Ambrose all expressed outright intolerance of Jews, and often in many different documents and their concerns extended beyond theological disputes with Jews, MacDonald writes that Chrysotom


Quote:
“describes Jews as numerous and wealthy, and he complains about the wealth of the Jewish Patriarch. He states that the patriarchs are not priests fulfilling a purely religious function, but rather they are shopkeepers and businessmen indicating that Chrysostom viewed Judaism more as an economic entity than a religious organization. Jews are often compared to predatory beasts and are accused of virtually every evil, including economic crimes such as profiteering. The intensely anti-Jewish St. Jerome also refers to Jews as encircling Christians and seeking to tear them apart. Jerome decries the Jew’s love for money in several passages and he complained that the Jews were multiplying "like vermin" a comment that clearly suggests a concern with Jewish reproductive success”.

Considering these sentiments it is not surprising the western church promulgated legal and economic sanctions against Jews; policies, interestingly enough, which favored
Quote:
“popular sentiment by combating the repeated tendencies of rulers [feudal lords] to favor the Jews for their own ends, especially with regard to Jewish money lending.”
The policies adopted by the western medieval Church often favored outright expulsion of Jews and these policies led to the development of a prosperous middle class in western societies, often at the expense of the feudal lords. But much of Eastern Europe had no effective corporate body which opposed the Jews, there segments of the feudal nobility succumbed to Jewish influence, throttling the development of a middle class. Specifically MacDonald mentions the Arenda system in which

Quote:
“a Jewish agent would lease an estate from a nobleman. In return for a set fee, the leaseholder would have the right to all the economic production of the estate and would also retain control of the feudal rights (including onerous forced labor requirements) over its inhabitants”
So, now we come to the twentieth century.

Chapter 5 of SAID is titled “National Socialism as an Anti-Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy” and is MacDonald’s only extended look at events in the twentieth century. Interestingly most of the focus is not on Hitler and the Nazis, but on Jewish ethnocentrism preceding the emergence of the National Socialist state. The surprising aspect of Chapter 5 is not the words and actions associated with the ideological founders of National Socialism but the words and actions of Germany’s Jews which have a surprising characteristic - a quality which can only be described as racialist.

Consider this quote published in a Zionist journal a few decades before the rise of National Socialism, which MacDonald uses to illustrate Jewish ethnocentrism in Germany

Quote:
“Those who demand assimilation of us either do not yet know that a man cannot get out of his skin? or else they know this and then expect of us shameful, daily humiliation, which consists in feigning Aryanism, suppressing our instincts, and squeezing into the skin of the Aryan, which does not fit us at all”
Again, MacDonald makes the case that National Socialism was a group evolutionary strategy which developed because of a perception among Germans that their group’s interests were being undermined by Jewish ethnocentrism. And with that in mind consider that Germany’s collapse after WWI precipitated a short lived Bolshevik revolution in Bavaria, organized by a Jew, Kurt Eisner, in 1918. In neighboring Hungary the Jew Bela Khun toppled the government and proclaimed a communist state, and then proceeded to terrorize the populace. And of course Jews also played a predominant role in the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, a revolution most communists thought would first happen in Germany: the mass killings and arrests and the slaughtering of the Tsar’s family in Russia were events many Germans felt were fated for their land; nor could perceptive Germans ignore the role Jews played in the Weimar corruption. As Historian David Irving notes:

Quote:
“The scale of Germany’s Jewish problem is revealed by an unpublished manuscript by Hitler’s predecessor as chancellor, Dr. Heinrich Bruning. Writing in American exile in 1943 he stated that after the inflation there was only one major German bank not controlled by Jews, some of them ‘utterly corrupt.’ In 1931 he had brought the banks under government supervision, and had had to keep the government’s findings of dishonesty in the banks secret ‘for fear of provoking antisemitic riots.’ “
If you accept MacDonald’s thesis that National Socialism is an Anti-Jewish group evolutionary strategy provoked by Jewish ethnocentrism then it might be asked what type of strategy did the National Socialists use to counter the Jews?

To answer that question I’ll close this broadcast by reading from the opening paragraphs of chapter 5 from SAID:

Quote:
“The National Socialist movement in Germany from 1933 - 1945 is a departure from Western tendencies toward universalism and muted individualism in the direction of racial nationalism and cohesive collectivism.”
MacDonald continues…

Quote:
“Most basically, National Socialism aimed at developing a cohesive group. There was an emphasis on the inculcation of selfless behavior and within-group altruism combined with outgroup hostility.”
Now that’s something to think about.

Thanks for listening.
 
Old December 9th, 2005 #9
Geoff Beck
Hammer
 
Geoff Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harz Mountains
Posts: 1,551
Geoff Beck
Default The Truth Is No Defense #3 Online

The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #3

Listen Here The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #3 (mp3 | 00:10:32)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2...NB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

December 9, 2005

Welcome to the broadcast.

Did you hear about the murder of Robert Osborn? On, November 20th, in Kansas City, Missouri, Osborn was bicycling home when two blacks, out of boredom we’re told, shot him for sport. In fact, Osborn was hunted. The blacks after stalking Osborn in their car fired two blasts from a shotgun, missing him. Frustrated they drove ahead of Osborn and waited behind a tree, as Osborn bicycled past the black murderer leapt from his lair and shot Osborn in the head, killing him.

The local media described the killing as “random,” despite the fact that Osborn was white and the killers were black; despite the fact the blacks are 7 times more likely to kill than whites; despite, for example, that blacks are only 12% of the US population but have killed 839 whites while, comparatively, whites were only responsible for the deaths of 362 blacks in 1998. Despite all these facts the murder of Robert Osborn was deemed “random.”

Now when I went to school I was taught the word random had certain connotations, such a thing without structure or organization or even something unknown or unexplainable. But there is an explanation for the murder of Robert Osborn. The cause of Robert Osborn's murder lies in the innate biological differences between blacks and whites. Biological differences that have been well investigated, though largely ignored and with tragic consequences. Blacks, for instance, have higher levels of testosterone, a hormone associated with aggression, and lower IQs. There are many more significant biological differences between blacks and whites, and for a deeper explanation of these differences I strongly encourage all curious listeners to acquire Phillipe Rushton's book entitled "Race, Evolution and Behavior."

You know the use of adjectives like "random" or "unexplainable" to describe crimes great and small is quite common today. Some years ago I recall seeing Eli Wiesel - the Jewish holocaust activist - on the PBS news program the News Hour. In a rather lengthy segment Wiesel was asked to explain the holocaust: why did it happen, he was asked? Despite considerable rambling Mr. Wiesel failed to explain adequately, I felt, the phenomenon of National Socialism and the "holocaust" incident. Such evil defied explanation, he said. ‘How, how’, Wiesel rhetorically asked, as he shrugged his shoulders, ‘could a modern and progressive state like Germany succumb to such evil.’ How indeed, Mr. Wiesel!

Well, you know, I'm not one to believe in evil spirits, magic, or divine intervention. I think there are rational explanations for way things are. There is a very good explanation for the rise of National Socialism in Germany, and that regime's hostility towards Jews. The events of the twentieth century are hardly unexplainable as Mr. Wiesel would like you to believe. Just as the murder of Robert Osborn is hardly a random.

There’s also been a great deal left unexplained about the Russian Revolution in 1917. The first serious book I read about the Russian Revolution was written by a Polish Jew living in America, name Richard Pipes. Pipe's emphasizes the role of the Intelligentsia, the coterie of intellectuals which he sees as largely responsible for the tragic events of 1917. Pipes weaves a long thread, extending backward centuries, to explain the formation of ideas which propelled Russia into a catastrophe. Though, I’ve reduced Pipes’ arguments greatly, I felt his explanation left much unexplained: how could a nation destroy everything it had known for a millennium? How could a people slaughter their rulers, destroy ancient churches, starve millions, and plunge themselves into civil war. Pipes' explanation just didn't add up in my mind.

Back in the 1970s there was a popular quip, "only Nixon could go to China." By this it was meant that only a supposed staunch anti-communist like Nixon could negotiate with red China. Similarly, I suppose, it takes a Jew to name a Jew. This Jew, though, is not Richard Pipes, but Yuri Slezkine. What Pipes omits in his history of Russia, Slezkine reveals. In his newly released book the "The Jewish Century" Slezkine ‘spills the beans’ about the role Jews played in overthrowing the Russian government, Slezkine tellingly describes Jews as "Stalin's willing executioners." I invite listeners to read Kevin MacDonald’s review of Slezkine’s book, which will be linked to in this program’s broadcast transcript posted on VNN Forum.

But really the "beans" were spilled long ago. Even before the revolution had settled down warnings flags were being raised, Winston Churchill wrote in Sunday Herald, 8th February, 1920:

Quote:
"This movement amongst the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky, Bela Kuhn, Rosa Luxembourg and Emma Goldman, this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing."
Churchill continues

Quote:
"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one. It probably outweighs all others. With the possible exception of Lenin, the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders."
Churchill was not alone in warning the world. But, the warnings went unheeded. With the arrival of Slezkine’s book there seems to be a willingness, within certain narrow corridors, to grudgingly admit the Jew's role in subverting Russia.

If crucial facts can be ignored from titanic historical events think what little lies can be inserted into local news stories, like the murder of Robert Osborn? When researching the case of Robert Osborn I discovered the employees at the grocery store where he worked held a memorial in his name. This murder and the grief it has caused ought never to have happened. If someone had only said "hey, did you read what Jefferson and Lincoln said, those blacks aren't like us and we can't share the same government”. I wonder too if anyone ever asked "hey, did you hear what Churchill said? Look at what they did to Russia. Let’s not let the Jews into our country. They're dangerous and not like us."

If such advice was given it was ignored.

You know, I bet decades in the future some Jew will publish a book explaining that blacks and whites evolved in different circumstances, and it biology and evolution which explain the differences between blacks and whites; perhaps a book a lot like Philippe Rushton's "Race, Evolution and Behavior," published in 1995.

I’d like to close this broadcast with a reading from the Robert Osborn’s memorial page:

Quote:
Robert Osborn
1962 - 2005

Robert had a solid set of core values that were derived from a traditional family structure. He had a robust personality that was sheathed in an equally impressive six-foot, two hundred-pound frame with soft blue eyes and raffish blond hair. He and his three brothers enjoyed family vacations, camping in the outdoors and boating at Table Rock Lake.

He earned numerous medals and honors, including Eagle Scout and the "God and Life Award". He took pride in hiking twenty miles on many historic scout trails in the Midwest and was a member of Troop 421, which met at St. Bernadette's Church.

Robert was a standout performer on the water polo and swim teams. After his junior year, Robert was selected for a special two-month, scientific research program that was sponsored by the National Science Foundation. As an honor roll student, he was consistently ranked in the top ten percent of the class.

Robert earned a pilot's license and was a member of the Civil Air Patrol. After graduating from Raytown High School in 1980, he attended Purdue University. He majored in engineering, but demonstrated advanced abilities in mathematics, culminating in graduate-level coursework.

Robert made people feel special with creative gifts and cards. He would usually bring home-brewed beer, based on distinctive Belgian or German formulas, to family gatherings. He just wanted to make everyone happy.

Thanks for listening.
 
Old December 10th, 2005 #10
VLC
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in Canuckistan
Posts: 228
VLC
Default

is the reverb/echo effect on purpose ? it sounds as if you record your broadcasts in some kind of hall.
 
Old April 16th, 2006 #11
Itz_molecular
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: in a gene near you
Posts: 4,982
Default

you might want to correct your archive page , it isn't 2007 , yet .
( I know that time fly's , but you don't have to give it a push ).
 
Old April 16th, 2006 #12
Geoff Beck
Hammer
 
Geoff Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harz Mountains
Posts: 1,551
Geoff Beck
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itz_molecular
you might want to correct your archive page , it isn't 2007 , yet .
( I know that time fly's , but you don't have to give it a push ).
Itz M:

Sorry, can't seem to find the 2007 reference you mentioned. Was it in the audio, transcript or some other place?
__________________
A White World (Pierce's Vision for our Race):
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/l...whiteworld.wmv
 
Old April 19th, 2006 #13
Itz_molecular
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: in a gene near you
Posts: 4,982
Default still 2007 ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Beck
Itz M:

Sorry, can't seem to find the 2007 reference you mentioned. Was it in the audio, transcript or some other place?
from the govnn.com main page, go to the audio archieve button . From VNN media index , choose your name 'geoff beck', on that page scroll down . The last two shows are shown as 2007 , shows #11 and #12 . Either they are wrong or that last nap of mine was 365 days and one hour long
 
Old April 21st, 2006 #14
Geoff Beck
Hammer
 
Geoff Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harz Mountains
Posts: 1,551
Geoff Beck
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itz_molecular
from the govnn.com main page, go to the audio archieve button . From VNN media index , choose your name 'geoff beck', on that page scroll down . The last two shows are shown as 2007 , shows #11 and #12 . Either they are wrong or that last nap of mine was 365 days and one hour long
Ah, I see it now. Thanks.
__________________
A White World (Pierce's Vision for our Race):
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/l...whiteworld.wmv
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.
Page generated in 0.49602 seconds.