Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 28th, 2021 #1
Jerry Abbott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hills north of Hillsboro WV
Posts: 1,048
Default Immigration versus Birthrate

The replacement of aged white Americans, who were innovative and productive in their younger days, with Third World immigrants (whether legal or not), isn't as good as having a white birthrate high enough to make those immigrants superfluous as laborers.

White people have a higher average human quality than (most) non-whites do. The very fact that those non-whites live in, or until recently lived in, the impoverished, war-torn, violence endemic Third World attests to their low human quality. Their desire to escape from the nests that they and their like fouled is proof that they do not deserve to be accepted by any white country.

Taking them in might seem charitable, but this is a charity that we cannot afford. Better to give them half of our money and keep them overseas. Better still to fence them out and ignore them entirely, as they rape each other, rob each other, and bash each others' brains out. They will do such things to us, if we are within their reach.

The best case scenario is that they follow the road that the Australopithecus took.

If whites had a birthrate that ensured quantitative replacement, then biological inheritance would automatically ensure the preservation of human quality. But mass immigration, while supplying quantity, will reduce quality. The costs of maintenance will be greater because of the reduction in the average resident's moral circumspection, and the return on investment will be less because of the average immigrant's inferior intelligence.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.
Page generated in 0.40804 seconds.