|
November 24th, 2017 | #321 |
Administrator
|
|
November 24th, 2017 | #323 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
the left can only conceive of itself as an outsider/rebel. it's a tactic for jews but a psychological thing with white leftists |
|
November 26th, 2017 | #324 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
|
For obvious reasons, low types like to see themselves as "the underdog," no matter their objective status financially etc.
"When I look into the eyes of that poor black juvenile delinquent who was convicted of rape and murder, I see myself when I was fifteen years old, working for my father's movie theater and sneaking free reads of the comic books in Mr. Horowitz's drugstore. That young man grew up on the street, I grew up on the street...we will always rebel against the power!"
__________________
No jews, just right Less talk, more action Last edited by Sean Gruber; November 26th, 2017 at 04:06 PM. |
December 20th, 2017 | #325 |
Administrator
|
posting some on blog. spent couple hours talking to an academic writing a study on alt-right. going to record with Jan tomorrow. shifted some equipment, so i'll be starting a new audio series soon, i have tested the new recorder, seems to work.
|
December 22nd, 2017 | #326 | |
Senior Member
|
[saw that you gabbed Griffin's article on alleged Trump accomplishments. I remember when you debated him back in 2012 iirc, he's matured a lot since then. let's just say that. one of the best commenters on the alt-right nowadays.]
Quote:
|
|
January 3rd, 2018 | #327 |
Administrator
|
made a decision last night. i'm going to refocus my blog entirely on christianity vs racialism. for general news, i will make comments on threads here. lately i've been listening to a lot of jones on youtube; it furthers my instinct that all the mentation devoted to IQ among racialists should have been directed at christianity, and the effects it has on our race, particularly on our self-conception, our ability to perceive enemies, grasp their nature, and the ways we defend ourselves.
christianity is not The enemy, that is jews, but it is a powerful, long running, extremely sophisticated set of beliefs that is more extensive and long lasting among our people than any other way of looking at the world. i believe it is the reason we are unable to defend ourselves. |
January 3rd, 2018 | #328 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
the cucks have long promoted in the mind of Joe Middle Class this bogus distinction, as you note, between illegal and legal. "I'm not a against immigration, just illegal immigration." But the law change in 1965 made 90% of legal immigration colored. That changes the racial nature of the country, and everything else along with it. That's the real objection. How did a law the majority of people don't want get passed? Because politicians are owned not by the people but by the contents of jewish wallets. White America is what we want. Colored America is what we don't want. How did we go from one toward the other? That's an answer only white nationalism can provide. |
|
January 3rd, 2018 | #329 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,633
|
Quote:
https://archive.org/details/MarcusEl...AgainstTheJews https://archive.org/details/CommisaryToTheGentiles The Ravage pieces are just for starters, of course, whereas Simpson's essays drill down to the ultimate basis of Christianity's poison for the West: its failure to involve the dual code, its exclusive insistence on individualism, and its total refusal to acknowledge the final and primary importance of the NATION. Simpson has pretty much covered the subject, but review in the contemporary tongue and times will be good, too. Go for it.
__________________
No way out but through the jews. |
|
January 3rd, 2018 | #330 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Alex Linder
Quote:
|
|
January 3rd, 2018 | #331 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If these requirements are not met, it is invasion. Atleast in a sensible world, but our countries let in scum by the standards (the supposed legality) I just set up and they're posing a danger to us so it is all futile, really. It's not about fulfilling some technicalities that are written in some law, as Mr. Linder correctly points out. |
|
January 4th, 2018 | #332 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
January 10th, 2018 | #333 |
Bread and Circuses
|
The right-wing libertarians and anarcho-capitalists are almost all on these digital money driven platforms and making some good quick bucks at it but I never see any "hate"or some divisive political opinions in it. It is something artificial, filtered, inclusive and "lovely". If you don't play their "friendly" game right there are no big shekels for you. Only by using the search function can you dig some WN stuff from obscurity.
https://d.tube// https://steemit.com https://www.dlive.io/#/ https://d.tube/#!/v/jeffberwick/6gucut8v
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. Last edited by RickHolland; January 10th, 2018 at 03:43 AM. |
January 15th, 2018 | #334 | |
Bread and Circuses
|
kike wants to #banmen
Quote:
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. |
|
January 15th, 2018 | #335 |
Administrator
|
very interesting, have learned a boatload last couple weeks. my impression is we're going to see the same thing with cryptocurrency we saw with the internet generally. the feds/jews are going to watch it grow wild and free and making people lots of money, and then when they're all used to it, they'll pass rules, put out their own coins, and try to rein it in, just as they're doing with internet the last couple years. that's the arc of the next fifteen years, say
|
January 15th, 2018 | #336 |
Administrator
|
the new technologies make government obsolete. i said that probably back in 2000. but they also make seamless control possible.
it comes back to human nature: the tech liberates them, gives them freedom, proves transactions, but it can also be used to track people down to the atoms. it's like i also been saying for decades, decentralized government is inherently pro-white and centralized government is inherently anti-white libertarian is fully racist but only at the level of the individual. it makes for the stronger individual, because he doesn't look to others (non-losers) to do what he should be able to do for himself. but when a race is under attack by other races, it must come together to defend itself, there's no other way. and that truth the libertarians refuse to acknowledge |
January 17th, 2018 | #337 |
Bread and Circuses
|
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. |
January 21st, 2018 | #338 |
Senior Member
|
Have you ever heard or seen a woman being engaged in a long and sincere discussion on something serious without having to throw in a laugh or a giggle every tenth minute? (and that's being more than equitable)
I listen to a ton of podcasts, both political and non-political, and there is a distinct difference between how men and women carry themselves in that aspect. I realize it is probably something hard-wired. Some kind of defense. Men laugh when there's been a joke told whereas a lot of women can start giggling right after saying something supposedly really serious. Last edited by Robbie Key; January 21st, 2018 at 03:35 PM. |
January 21st, 2018 | #339 | |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Quote:
There is a psychological reason, but different in different instances. With women, they feel like they have to cushion whatever they're saying, lest someone not like them. With men, it's lack of confidence, which makes them do the same thing. Nervous laugh after a strong statement. And then of course regardless of sex, laughing in-between words can also indicate dishonesty, same as constant gaze-shifting. Watch Pat Robertson for a full hour if you can tolerate it and you'll see copious amounts of nervous cackling.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
|
January 22nd, 2018 | #340 |
Senior Member
|
Yeah, insecurity is definitely part of it. I don't really blame women for it, it is very endearing a lot of times. Useful tool to be sure. A beautiful smile is perhaps the best part of women.
It just annoys me when an otherwise intelligent and serious woman starts giggling randomly. Definitely lowers the the perceived value of what you just said. |
Tags |
alex linder, alinderblog.blogspot.com |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|