Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old July 17th, 2009 #1
Johann Steffansson
Doppelgänger
 
Johann Steffansson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ObamaNation
Posts: 630
Default Jewess Admits "anti-semitic" label is a ploy

In the US, its "anti-semitic"....in Europe, its the Holohoax. Here it is, straight from the horse's ass, er "mouth".



__________________
"Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything." - Gilbert Keith Chesterton

Free Mein Kampf mp3 download: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...428#post749428
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #2
Curious
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,109
Default

Shulamit Aloni said that if all jews were religious, Hitler would be right. In other words, she believes religious jews deserve a holocaust.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Good stuff. This kind of thing is far more important than nigger crime news.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

I'm moving this to the new forum, The Verbal War, in which I will teach White men of good will how to beat kikes verbally.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #5
Mack Bartlow
Senior Member
 
Mack Bartlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,029
Default

I'm surprised that BoobTube has not censored this vid. The comments are encouraging.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #6
Mack Bartlow
Senior Member
 
Mack Bartlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,029
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I'm moving this to the new forum, The Verbal War, in which I will teach White men of good will how to beat kikes verbally.
The best way IMHO is to just quote their propaganda and point to it. ie, "Why do Jews support the illegal alien invasion"? Post quotes from AIPAC, ADL and so on.
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #7
Derrick Beukeboom
Senior Member
 
Derrick Beukeboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Goy Wonder
Posts: 1,327
Default

WN proven right once again.

important, please spread the link around.

great find!
 
Old July 17th, 2009 #8
Johann Steffansson
Doppelgänger
 
Johann Steffansson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ObamaNation
Posts: 630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Good stuff. This kind of thing is far more important than nigger crime news.
Agreed. Break the kikes' game and the nigger issue will right itself.

Nigs, muds, etc. are the infection - jews are the foreign projectile in the wound.
__________________
"Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything." - Gilbert Keith Chesterton

Free Mein Kampf mp3 download: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...428#post749428
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #9
Dale VanderMeer
Your Pro-White Neighbor...
 
Dale VanderMeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Somewhere On Your Block Or Road...
Posts: 4,353
Blog Entries: 9
Default

Just left a comment there. The rest of you should do it too.

It is always a double standard with the jews, they can talk trash about Whites. But god forbid you should call them out on their ethnocentric and supremacist behavior on us and the Palestinians.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #10
Karl Von Clausewitz!
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Bartlow View Post
The best way IMHO is to just quote their propaganda and point to it. ie, "Why do Jews support the illegal alien invasion"? Post quotes from AIPAC, ADL and so on.
I respectfully have to disagree, there's a certain method in how jews debate matters with people. Citing matters of this nature isn't going to be flexible enough to ensure that you are always in control of the conversation. It is necessary to coach people on the nature of discussion, the tricks of the trade so to speak, that would ensure they pick up on any attempt by their foes to employ it.

Also, citing matters in a quest for truth, against an opponent to whom truth is of secondary or less importance isn't going to make you win the argument. The old saying that Truth prevails is true only when time allows it to, but in matters of social discourse, winning is the objective, and truth irrelevant, the one who makes his opponent laughable in the face of others would have won on the day.

On here, you can come back and save face the next day, in person you've lost and it's over you'll likely not see that opponent again.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #11
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Bartlow View Post
The best way IMHO is to just quote their propaganda and point to it. ie, "Why do Jews support the illegal alien invasion"? Post quotes from AIPAC, ADL and so on.
If you did that you'd probably lose the argument to be quite honest. Since that reeks of the fallacy of 'quote mining' in so far as few people here know enough about jews to be able to even be convincing let alone be able to correct jews about interpretations of their own literature in such a way as they cannot escape its meaning. You'd also have to make sure your quotations were well beyond reproach and offered a representative sample of said organisations literature: you'd also have to say why you picked those organisations in your sample and not others.

You have to know a lot about jews to be able to debate jews and it is of little use reading standard anti-Semitic literature, because that material, with one or two exceptions, tells you very little that is factual about the jews and an awful lot that is plain wrong (for which the jews have standard responses).

In essence in any given topic you have to be able to go in depth or you will lose (propagandistically and intellectually), because the jews will bombard you with references, which you should have either read or be aware of the argument of/what evidenced used for.

Study the jew before you fight the jew: it is really that simple.
__________________
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #12
George Witzgall
Senior Member
 
George Witzgall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
Default

I don't get it. I thought you all were anti-semitic?
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan

Last edited by George Witzgall; July 18th, 2009 at 12:19 PM.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #13
Karl Von Clausewitz!
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Witzgall View Post
I don't get it. I thought you all were anti-semetic?
Yes, but the significance of such a statement isn't pertinent to us, rather to the average American who flinches, backs of and immediately apologises for having questioned anything relating to the Jewish people.

It's no surprise to me that she had said so, even if she hadn't, it's common knowledge that they do use labels as a means of controlling opinions. They aren't the only ones who do this, the blacks frequently use "racism" as a label to stifle opinions.


Of course the average liberal American use labels as well, to try and stifle opinions that contradict their populist view, it's a tactic used and learned by them. They see T.V. Shows constantly refer to "racists" as "ignorant", "White Trash" the hollywood version of a "Nazi" a genocidal maniac etc...and make use of these T.V. sentiments in social discourse.

Test it if you wish, you'll see these insults pop up among the liberal American including "racist" and "Anti-Semite" and of course my personal favourite "Little Hitler, Hitler's spawn of satan etc", you'll see yourself being called a Racist by the African Negro residing in America, you'll see yourself being called an Anti-Semite by the jews.

Last edited by Karl Von Clausewitz!; July 18th, 2009 at 12:23 PM.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #14
George Witzgall
Senior Member
 
George Witzgall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
Default

the nice thing about the label anti-semitism, and the reason it has been perpetuated (even though it is innaccurately used to describe anti-jewish sentiment), is that it implies a hatred based on race, which is immutable; whereas anti-judaism would highlight the religious aspect, and it is far more acceptable to hate a religion.

you fall right into this trap when you promulgate the term. perhaps you should use the label anti-jewish instead.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan

Last edited by George Witzgall; July 18th, 2009 at 12:48 PM.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #15
Karl Von Clausewitz!
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Witzgall View Post
you fall right into this trap when you promulgate the term.
It's only a trap when you allow it to effect you, or to dictate the terms of the discussion. In my opinion, those who get beaten into submission over mere insults from others, aren't strong of mind to be the few to lead the way,they will fall in the latter category of the many who follow.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #16
EireannGoddess
Member
 
EireannGoddess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,979
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Witzgall View Post
I don't get it. I thought you all were anti-semitic?
An example is perhaps that of the average White liberal anti who would come to this forum to debate the "rednecks", the "KKK", the "Nazis", having based all that they know about NS or even WN on a few books they might have read (which is doubtful) - more often they have based their opinion as well as knowledge on what a jew professor of mine once (with pride) described as "The Glass Tit", ie, the telly.

the few jews who do come here do not take us seriously, at least at first, because they have become confident that their knowledge of the Aryan is more than sufficient, which sometimes it is since they can make a thread or topic go on endlessly, using jewish 'logic' which they do believe is far superior to ours.

These threads usually end on sour notes, with the jew skulking off - with ample evidence that we are anti-semites (which, they do "forget" also applies to their arab cousins etc) simply because, having won the battle of words by use use of simple insult, we lost the propaganda war, and we lost because we do not sufficiently know the nature of the enemy we fight. And, the jew is our one natural enemy, we should try to make effort to know at least the types of weapon and the name of the venom it uses to kill and infect our Folk.

jews are not all that interesting as a group, they do not have magic powers, their "world view", jewish thought is very dull and rather boring to muddle through study of, however, judaism is infectious because our lack of proper knowledge of this our one eternal enemy prevents us from developing an effective and lasting antidote or cure.

Of course, I think we can all agree what the ultimate antidote is for jews. However, there is a method and a manner in order to reach this ultimate victory over the enemy. They have to be engaged and trapped first. We figure out how to track, trap and eliminate other enemies to us, usually by some study of the behaviour - whether it be virus, a rabid dog, a rat or jew.

In debate and propaganda, language and knowledge, must go hand in hand, and are the weapon. There is nothing a jew loathes and fears more than an educated Aryan who understands jewish ego. And in actuality, that's what their "intellect" is all about, their literature, even their 'religion'. Unfettered jewish ego. And, a wounded jewish ego is quite something to behold - for it is then, and only then that this enemy shows it's true self and behaviour.

They are immune to being called names. They laugh while bemoaning the "hate" directed toward them.

But, an Aryan with both an instinctual recognition of the jew for what it is, who is also equally acquainted and versed in jewish "knowledge" (which the jew believes is quite esoteric, complicated and far beyond our ability to digest) - Believe me, nothing on earth terrifies a kike more than that one Aryan - for that one Aryan is the very definition of Amalek to the jew, the one being they know can and will destroy them forever.

Last edited by EireannGoddess; July 18th, 2009 at 04:46 PM.
 
Old July 18th, 2009 #17
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Witzgall View Post
the nice thing about the label anti-semitism, and the reason it has been perpetuated (even though it is innaccurately used to describe anti-jewish sentiment), is that it implies a hatred based on race, which is immutable; whereas anti-judaism would highlight the religious aspect, and it is far more acceptable to hate a religion.
You realise the hypocrisy of your comments I presume?

In so far as you are suggesting that you need to change a term because it is unacceptable propagandistically, but that it is alright to acceptably 'hate' a religion in what is essentially regarded as the same thing by your audience.

People make little distinction between anti-Judaism and anti-Semitism for the simple reason that the distinction, although definite from an intellectual point of view, simply doesn't exist in most people's minds for 'anti-Judaism', argues an oft-cited school of thought in jewish studies, is the same as 'anti-Semitism' and only differs in that it is applying a different frame of reference relative to the intellectual trends of the era it operated in.

In essence you are suggesting that people here just be 'bigots' rather than 'racists' in the popular mind when in fact they are regarded as one and the same by said popular mind.

Quote:
you fall right into this trap when you promulgate the term.
The 'trap' is only there if you allow it to snag you. The 'trap' in the term is not very propagandistic in so far as it only becomes a propaganda tool when it causes you to falter and hestitate. That is all the scream of 'anti-Semite' is: it is a poor poisoning the wells fallacy that can be easily circumvented by knowing what you are about.

Anti-Semites in the 1920s for example had exactly the same problem and they turned 'anti-Semite' from a negative term to a positive one by a successful propaganda campaign leading to a greater extent to the formation of the Third Reich.

If you want an example close to your heart then look at the evolution of the term 'faggot' and how 'fag' has adopted by your kind to mean something positive, while to many, including me, it is a term of absolute derision indicating individuals who should be summarily shot and rolled into a mass grave (metaphorically-speaking of course).

Quote:
perhaps you should use the label anti-jewish instead.
Which is inaccurate, because if one is anti-Semitic then one is opposed to Semites, including jews, based on race and if one is a racialist then one must abide by race. Otherwise one is not a racialist and can go and join Richard Dawkins in his religious 'hate religion' ideology.
__________________

Last edited by Karl Radl; July 18th, 2009 at 05:29 PM.
 
Reply

Tags
jewish ethnocentrism, the verbal war

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.
Page generated in 0.50327 seconds.