Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old January 29th, 2023 #21
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default Russia's 'Dead Hand' Is a Soviet-Built Nuclear Doomsday Device


Russia's 'Dead Hand' Is a Nuclear Doomsday Device



A lot of great technology was developed during the Cold War. Things like GPS, the internet and microchips were all developed as part of the arms-race tech boom. Unfortunately, so was the Novichok nerve agent, the world's largest nuclear weapon and Russia's doomsday device, just to name a few.


You read that right. Like something out of one of the worst James Bond movies, the Soviet Union developed a world-ending mechanism that would launch all of its nuclear weapons without any command from an actual human.


Russia currently has an estimated 1,600 deployed tactical nuclear weapons, with another 2,400 strategic nuclear weapons tied to intercontinental ballistic missiles. This makes Russia the largest nuclear power in the world. All of these weapons are tied into the Perimeter, an automatic nuclear weapons control system.



The RT-2PM ICBM was designed to be road mobile and is mounted on a heavy truck.


In a crisis that might mean a first strike from the United States, high-ranking government officials or military commanders could activate the Perimeter. Perimeter would guarantee that the Soviet Union (and now, Russia) could respond even if its entire armed forces were wiped out.


Once switched on, the Perimeter system can launch the entire Russian nuclear arsenal in response to a nuclear attack. It was part of the Cold War doctrine of mutually assured destruction, a means of deterring nuclear attacks by ensuring the side who initiated a first strike also would be annihilated.


Called "Dead Hand" in the West, the theory is that a command and control system measures communications on military frequencies, radiation levels, air pressure, heat and short-term seismic disturbances. If the measurement points to a nuclear attack, the Perimeter begins a sequence that would end in the firing of all ICBMs in the Soviet (now, Russian) arsenal.


Perimeter would launch a command rocket, tipped with a radio warhead that transmits launch orders to Russian nuclear silos, even with the presence of radio jamming. The rocket would fly across the entire length of the country. After a number of test launches to prove the viability of such a command rocket, the Perimeter system went online in 1985.


The Soviet Union never confirmed that such a system ever existed, but Russian Strategic Missile Forces Gen. Sergey Karakaev confirmed it to a Russian newspaper in 2011, saying the U.S. could be destroyed in 30 minutes. Russian state media outlets suggest the system was upgraded to include radar early warning systems and Russia's new hypersonic missiles.


In the United States, similar technologies were developed. Seismic and radiation sensors are used to monitor parts of the U.S. and the world for nuclear explosions and other activity, but the U.S. military never created an automatic trigger for its arsenal. Instead, it ensured that American humans with the ability and authority to launch a second strike would survive a first strike.


Since the Perimeter is reportedly still active, the danger of an automatic, computer-generated nuclear strike still exists. Now that Russian President Vladimir Putin has put Russia's nuclear weapons on high alert, he might have taken Russia's doomsday device on notice as well.


-- Blake Stilwell can be reached at [email protected]. He can also be found on Twitter @blakestilwell or on Facebook.


rense:
Russia's 'Dead Hand' Is A Soviet Built
Nuclear Doomsday Device



For a long time Trains have had a 'dead man pedal'. Would only be common sense the Russian Military had one.
The whole '1917 October Russian Revolution was totally jewish inspired and executed'.
This Globalist plan to retake Russia again is Armageddon and assures mutual destruction of mankind and our World.
 
Old January 30th, 2023 #22
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default This Time It’s Different Neither we nor our allies are prepared to fight all-out war with Russia, regionally or globally.

Until it decided to confront Moscow with an existential military threat in Ukraine, Washington confined the use of American military power to conflicts that Americans could afford to lose, wars with weak opponents in the developing world from Saigon to Baghdad that did not present an existential threat to U.S. forces or American territory. This time—a proxy war with Russia—is different.


Contrary to early Beltway hopes and expectations, Russia neither collapsed internally nor capitulated to the collective West’s demands for regime change in Moscow. Washington underestimated Russia’s societal cohesion, its latent military potential, and its relative immunity to Western economic sanctions.


As a result, Washington’s proxy war against Russia is failing. U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was unusually candid about the situation in Ukraine when he told the allies in Germany at Ramstein Air Base on January 20, “We have a window of opportunity here, between now and the spring,” admitting, “That’s not a long time.”



Alexei Arestovich, President Zelensky’s recently fired advisor and unofficial “Spinmeister,” was more direct. He expressed his own doubts that Ukraine can win its war with Russia and he now questions whether Ukraine will even survive the war. Ukrainian losses—at least 150,000 dead including 35,000 missing in action and presumed dead—have fatally weakened Ukrainian forces resulting in a fragile Ukrainian defensive posture that will likely shatter under the crushing weight of attacking Russian forces in the next few weeks.



Ukraine’s materiel losses are equally severe.
These include thousands of tanks and armored infantry fighting vehicles, artillery systems, air defense platforms, and weapons of all calibers. These totals include the equivalent of seven years of Javelin missile production. In a setting where Russian artillery systems can fire nearly 60,000 rounds of all types—rockets, missiles, drones, and hard-shell ammunition—a day, Ukrainian forces are hard-pressed to answer these Russian salvos with 6,000 rounds daily. New platform and ammunition packages for Ukraine may enrich the Washington community, but they cannot change these conditions.


Predictably, Washington’s frustration with the collective West’s failure to stem the tide of Ukrainian defeat is growing. In fact, the frustration is rapidly giving way to desperation.


Michael Rubin, a former Bush appointee and avid supporter of America’s permanent conflicts in the Middle East and Afghanistan, vented his frustration in a 1945 article asserting that, “if the world allows Russia to remain a unitary state, and if it allows Putinism to survive Putin, then, Ukraine should be allowed to maintain its own nuclear deterrence, whether it joins NATO or not.” On its face, the suggestion is reckless, but the statement does accurately reflect the anxiety in Washington circles that Ukrainian defeat is inevitable.


NATO’s members were never strongly united behind Washington’s crusade to fatally weaken Russia. The governments of Hungary and Croatia are simply acknowledging the wider European public’s opposition to war with Russia and lack of support for Washington’s desire to postpone Ukraine’s foreseeable defeat.


Though sympathetic to the Ukrainian people, Berlin did not support all-out war with Russia on Ukraine’s behalf. Now, Germans are also uneasy with the catastrophic condition of the German armed forces.


Retired German Air Force General (four-star equivalent) Harald Kujat, former chairman of the NATO Military Committee, severely criticized Berlin for allowing Washington to railroad Germany into conflict with Russia, noting that several decades of German political leaders actively disarmed Germany and thus deprived Berlin of authority or credibility in Europe. Though actively suppressed by the German government and media, his comments are resonating strongly with the German electorate.


The blunt fact is that in its efforts to secure victory in its proxy war with Russia, Washington ignores historical reality. From the 13th century onward, Ukraine was a region dominated by larger, more powerful national powers, whether Lithuanian, Polish, Swedish, Austrian, or Russian.


In the aftermath of the First World War, abortive Polish designs for an independent Ukrainian State were conceived to weaken Bolshevik Russia. Today, Russia is not communist, nor does Moscow seek the destruction of the Polish State as Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, and their followers did in 1920.


So where is Washington headed with its proxy war against Russia? The question deserves an answer.


On Sunday December 7, 1941, U.S. Ambassador Averell Harriman was with Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill having dinner at Churchill’s home when the BBC broadcast the news that the Japanese had attacked the U.S. Naval Base at Pearl Harbor. Harriman was visibly shocked. He simply repeated the words, “The Japanese have raided Pearl Harbour.”


Harriman need not have been surprised. The Roosevelt administration had practically done everything in its power to goad Tokyo into attacking U.S. forces in the Pacific with a series of hostile policy decisions culminating in Washington’s oil embargo during the summer of 1941.


In the Second World War, Washington was lucky with timing and allies. This time it’s different. Washington and its NATO allies are advocating a full-blown war against Russia, the devastation and breakup of the Russian Federation, as well as the destruction of millions of lives in Russia and Ukraine.


Washington emotes. Washington does not think, and it is also overtly hostile to empiricism and truth. Neither we nor our allies are prepared to fight all-out war with Russia, regionally or globally. The point is, if war breaks out between Russia and the United States, Americans should not be surprised. The Biden administration and its bipartisan supporters in Washington are doing all they possibly can to make it happen.



Macgregor - This Time Its Different 30 I 2023.


"if war breaks out between Russia and the United States" that's what this mentally deficient stupid clown was installed as President of the USA for.
 
Old February 2nd, 2023 #23
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default The West Is Now Impotent In The Ukraine Conflict

The West Is Now Impotent In The Ukraine Conflict
Gonzalo Lira


Saker:
The West Is Now Impotent In The Ukraine Conflict 02 II 2023.
 
Old February 7th, 2023 #24
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default What Becomes of NATO After The Loss In Ukraine (Gonzalo Lira)

What Becomes of NATO After The Loss In Ukraine (Gonzalo Lira)



NATO is not a defensive alliance. NATO is an aggressor alliance.

Since the end of the First Cold War, NATO has attacked Serbia in the 1990s; Afghanistan as part of the bogus “War on Terrorism” in 2001; Libya in 2011; and now is fighting Russia in a proxy war that it deliberately provoked. These wars are all premised on lies.

The NATO agenda is not defensive. The NATO agenda is to act as a sock puppet for the Americans to advance what has been their driving ambition since the end of the First Cold War: American world dominance. U.S. Strategy Plan Calls For Insuring No Rivals Develop




What Becomes of NATO After The Loss In Ukraine (Gonzalo Lira)
07 II 2023.

Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

Keep your head buried in the Media B S sand or evaluate for yourself and understand what's going on.
 
Old February 7th, 2023 #25
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default Zelensky Dodged the Draft FOUR TIMES in 2014 / 2015

Reports coming from inside the Ukraine ministry of Defense claim President Volodomyr Zelensky was summonsed to serve in the Ukraine Military, four times in 2014 and 2015, but never reported as ordered. Today, he is President of Ukraine, sending tens-of-thousands of soldiers to their deaths against Russia.


From sources inside the Ukraine Ministry of Defense (verbatim): "We inform that the citizen Zelensky V.A. has been registered in the military Register of conscripts in the Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support of the United Metallurgy-Dolgintsev District of Krivoy Rog since 22.12.2008 and to this day, military rank - soldier, military registration specialty - clerk of Records", - noted in the Ministry of Defense.


"For the convocation during the mobilization, summonses were sent to the citizen Zelensky V.A.: 15.04.2014, 23.06.2014, 15.08.2014, 10.05.2015 to the address indicated in his registration documents. The citizen Zelensky V.A. did not come to the convocation office when he was summoned." This four-time conscientious objector /or perhaps more appropriately "Draft-Dodger," became the commander-in-chief.


The Effects:

Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny secretly informed the United States about the deaths of 257 thousand soldiers of the Ukrainian army. From my former colleagues in the Intel Community: “When Zaluzhny was in the US, he met with Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and General Milley. He secretly told them that Ukraine had lost 257,000 military troops since the beginning of the conflict."


Reports from inside Ukraine as of Sunday, 5 February 2023, indicate UKRAINIAN CONSCRIPTION AGE LOWERED TO 16


It is perfectly useless and even shameful to shift the blame on a cocaine-addicted comedian for the death of 257,000 Ukrainian soldiers, moreover highlighting the fact that he never responded to calls from his country's Ministry of Defense, because the Jew Zelensky has been chosen by the Jew Victoria Nuland, US Deputy Secretary of State, together with Antony Blinken the Jewish Secretary of State and funded by the Jewish billionaire George Soros , and he was chosen precisely for these "noble qualities" of his, without which, certain jobs to say the least little sordid, they cannot be done. If Americans, since the beginning 1776, are exploited by parasites jewish elites/lobbies/lodges (who don't care at all of non Jewish) and do nothing (because they can't do anything) to kick off them from American soil, their troubles are always and solely caused by themselves. The ukrainian president who send to assured death his soldiers of him or the russian president who has not yet crushed him like a cockroach out of pure Christian mercy, have nothing to do with american troubles, which have indeed deliberately originated a war in the heart of Europe, that will inevitably flow in a global nuclear war.



Zelensky Dodged the Draft FOUR TIMES in 2014 / 2015
 
Old February 9th, 2023 #26
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default The US Has Legalized Theft


The US Has Legalized Theft





Gonzalo, other nations’ asset theft is not something new: Do you have any idea where went Gadhafi’s tons of gold & billions of foreign reserves? Lebanon´s 400 billion worth of regular clients’ deposits for not being unable to renew 2,5 billion Euros of state loan? And literally, destroy the whole country for decades to come. All these pirating smacks of “chosenite” to me. Because every penny of these thefts can be traced. But the subject is sunk under 3000 mts. of depth in the Mediterranean sea. Like thousands of refugees that “dictator” Gadhafi would have kept alive.


This is true the USA has become a criminal cabal because of deep debt, and your bank accounts are not even safe for under the Dodd-Frank Act the bank can take your money.

Renowned trends researcher and publisher of “The Trends Journal,” Gerald Celente, predicted last February on USAWatchdog.com that “World War III has already started.” Fast forward to today, and the global war is increasing at an alarming rate. Celente says, “American troops are on the ground in Ukraine, they are just not wearing the uniforms. So, we are at war there, and so is NATO. I say send me a hand gun because I want to blow the guy’s brains out across the street. Are you an accessory to the crime? Are you part of it? Of course you are. . . . Look at the budget that Congress just passed. It’s a $1.7 trillion budget, and over half went to the military industrial complex.”

The economy is in big trouble, and that means war is a lock, according to Celente. “The global economy is crashing. It was artificially built up when they started the Covid war. There were countless trillions of dollars that they pumped into it. . . . This thing is going to crash big. When all else fails, they take you to war. What followed the Great Depression? WWII. What followed the dot com bust? The war on terror, and the same thing is going to happen now.”

Celente says the economy is already falling apart, and the tip-off is the mass firing of temporary workers. Add in inflation, and real pain is happening in the economy right now. Celente says, “They bought less in terms of dollars, but it’s way worse because they don’t factor in inflation. In other words, people paid a lot more to buy a lot less.”

Celente also predicts a huge commercial real estate meltdown. The meltdown in residential real estate will be a bit less.

In closing, Celente warns about not just war in Ukraine overheating, but in the Middle East too. Celente explains, “The United States is doing drills with Israel at a level never seen before. If there is a military confrontation with the U.S. and Israel against Iran, you are going to see oil prices spike to above $130 per barrel. That will crash the global economy. . . . If the Ukraine war and the Middle East war explodes at the same time, everything is finished.”




The US Has Legalized Theft
09 II 2023.
 
Old February 9th, 2023 #27
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,173
Default

Could you possibly use a darker text color? Your post is difficult to read.
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old February 10th, 2023 #28
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default FACT CHECK: Joe Biden Claims America Is ‘United’ in Support for Ukraine


FACT CHECK: Joe Biden Claims America Is ‘United’ in Support for Ukraine





CLAIM: President Joe Biden claimed during the State of the Union address Americans are united in support for Ukraine.

Biden told the Ukrainian ambassador to the U.S., who was a guest at the speech, “America is united in our support for your country. We will stand with you as long as it takes.”

VERDICT: FALSE. Recent polls show the country is now almost evenly divided in supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia.

A recent poll published by NBC News on January 31 showed there is a near-even split on whether Congress should provide more aid to Ukraine.

According to the poll, which was conducted January 20-24, 49% of adults surveyed said Congress should provide more funding and weapons to Ukraine, and 47% said Congress should not. The margin of error was three percent.

Another recent poll, conducted by the Pew Research Center, showed deep partisan division on the issue.

In the poll conducted January 18-24, 40% of Republicans or Republican-leading independents said there is “too much” support for Ukraine, versus only 15% of Democrats or Democrat-leaning independents saying it is “too much.”

“The share of adults who say the U.S. is providing too much aid to Ukraine has increased 6 percentage points since last September and 19 points since shortly after Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine last year,” Pew Research said in a post.

While most of the shift is accounted for by Republicans, there is a growing percentage of Democrats who also say the U.S. is providing too much aid — a 10% increase from last March.

Pew also noted “there is a wide partisan gap over whether Russia’s invasion of Ukraine poses a major threat to U.S. interests or not, a shift from the early days of the conflict.” It said: Last March, Republicans and Democrats were about equally likely to say that the invasion posed a major threat to U.S. interests (51% of Republicans said this, as did 50% of Democrats). The share of Americans who see the conflict as a major threat to U.S. interests has declined in both parties since March 2022. Today, Republicans are far less likely than Democrats to say this (29% vs. 43%).

Biden said during his speech that supporting Ukraine was defending “democracy.”

“For such a defense matters to us because it keeps the peace and prevents open season for would-be aggressors to threaten our security and prosperity,” he argued. “Our nation is working for more freedom, more dignity, and more peace, not just in Europe, but everywhere.”

The U.S. government has committed more than $113 billion to supporting Ukraine since the beginning of the conflict in February 2022, including more than $27 billion in military assistance. Biden recently approved sending Abrams tanks to Ukraine, a major step in providing Ukraine’s military with more lethal support.


There was a growing divide among the American public on Ukraine even before the recent polls.

In December, nearly half of Americans said Washington should urge Ukraine to settle for peace as soon as possible.

A November 18-20 Chicago Global Affairs Council survey found that “the overall US public is now divided on whether the United States should support Ukraine as long as it takes or if it should urge Kyiv to settle for peace as soon as possible.

“Americans are now closely divided on whether Washington should support Ukraine “as long as it takes” (48%, down from 58% in July 2022) or whether Washington should urge Ukraine to settle for peace as soon as possible (47%, up from 38% in July),”
the survey showed.

This is NOT Our WAR!!! Let Europe handle this problem.

Its not our war either .. we want nothing to do with corrupt Ukraine.


FACT CHECK: Joe Biden Claims America Is ‘United’ in Support for Ukraine


MSM is essential in selling WAR to the public who are made pay for it.
 
Old February 11th, 2023 #29
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default

 
Old February 11th, 2023 #30
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,173
Default

I don't know why they keep calling the Kiev regime Nazis and fascists when it is a USZOG puppet state with a jew comedian puppet president, Zelensky. Otherwise, Maria Zakharova's briefings are always excellent, and more importantly, the truth.

__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old February 13th, 2023 #31
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default Z-day

“Z-day" approaches as Russia prepares massive assault against Ukraine and NATO

All signs point to a Russian offensive moving against Ukraine within the next 20 days. This offensive will be much larger in size and equipment compared to the February 2022 offensive, but it will move more slowly and methodically, avoiding Blitzkrieg tactics and instead relying on by-the-book military doctrine of a slow, steady, relentless pummeling of the enemy while gaining ground.

This offensive is being called “Z-Day” and will reportedly involve over 700 aircraft, 1,800 Russian tanks and 500,000 soldiers, all designed to take down the Zelensky regime that has functioned as a proxy for NATO’s attempts to eliminate Russia from the world map.

Russia is currently updating its retaliation rules to allow a first strike “preventative” attack using nuclear weapons to prevent NATO from further threatening Russia’s existence.

This means we may be just weeks away from "global nuclear war.”

Notice of Fraud

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford


When all else fails they take you to WAR

 
Old February 13th, 2023 #32
Ray Allan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 15,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jagd messer View Post
“Z-day" approaches as Russia prepares massive assault against Ukraine and NATO

All signs point to a Russian offensive moving against Ukraine within the next 20 days. This offensive will be much larger in size and equipment compared to the February 2022 offensive, but it will move more slowly and methodically, avoiding Blitzkrieg tactics and instead relying on by-the-book military doctrine of a slow, steady, relentless pummeling of the enemy while gaining ground.

This offensive is being called “Z-Day” and will reportedly involve over 700 aircraft, 1,800 Russian tanks and 500,000 soldiers, all designed to take down the Zelensky regime that has functioned as a proxy for NATO’s attempts to eliminate Russia from the world map.

Russia is currently updating its retaliation rules to allow a first strike “preventative” attack using nuclear weapons to prevent NATO from further threatening Russia’s existence.

This means we may be just weeks away from "global nuclear war.”

Notice of Fraud

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford


When all else fails they take you to WAR

https://youtu.be/rdxRcs-HzKE
The 'Notice of Fraud' states this is not Fulford's article, but someone spreading fear porn and false information. Who would obtain classified or secret information that Russia is changing its nuclear doctrine or planning a massive offensive against Ukraine and against NATO? Someone who wants war with Russia, that's who. The list of suspects is real short. "Z-Day?" Give us a break.
__________________
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."

--Henry A. Kissinger, jewish politician and advisor
 
Old February 14th, 2023 #34
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default Col. Macgregor: Ukraine is About to be ANNIHILATED





Colonel Douglas Macgregor sits down with Stephen Gardner to update us on the Ukraine Russia war. Did NATO want this war? Will the US trigger world war 3 in order to prop up Biden and his white house? Was the Chinese spy balloon to embarrass Biden or is it to distract Americans? Can Ukraine beat Putin? Can Nato beat Putin?


http://https://youtu.be/rnut-E_eEM0
14 II 2023.
 
Old February 19th, 2023 #35
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default As well as the proxy war we pay for this 'coke head'.

 
Old February 21st, 2023 #36
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default ‘kneel down and ask forgiveness’: Angry ukrainians appeal to zelensky

In January, Zelensky blamed Russia for the helicopter crash in Brovary, because of which the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine was killed:

“War is not only on the battlefield, war has several directions. There are no more accidents. All this is the result of war. All these steps, everything that happens, missiles that hit our people, on the civilians, deaths of children…”

In response, the President of Ukraine received the following appeal from a Ukrainian woman:

“Tell me please, how can you constantly blame everyone, but not yourself? Never yourself! Everyone is always to blame, not you! What are you sitting there for? Why did you run for president of our country? To destroy our nation? Right now, that’s what it looks like!

For you, everyone else is to blame for everything. You collect all the scrap metal from all over the European Union! You make young guys who have newborn babies and pregnant wives go to the front. You changed the law, so now even sixteen year olds are conscripted, and seventeen year olds go to the hot spots. You’re even the official sponsor of fucking British scientists who dissect our guys for organs.

You bastard, your wife walks around in a 40 thousand euro raincoat, and this wasn’t even a New Year’s gift! She lies that she knows the prices in her country and claims that mackerel costs 8 hryvnia… Have some conscience, Zelensky! Haven’t you ruined everything? Are you not afraid that your children will pay for your sins?

You laugh, mock and jeer the common people, thanks to whom you became a millionaire! You’re a dollar millionaire, for fuck’s sake! Where did you get it – from the war, fucking hell, from bones! I understand that you don’t feel sorry for anyone, you bastard, but don’t you even feel sorry for your children? Just get out of Ukraine!

Take all these fuckers that you sponsored, all these Banderites… and just fuck off to Britain! People are tired of you, tired of your regime, tired of your lies, do you understand or not? You lie all the time, you brute! You’ve never told the truth! Go out now to Khreshchatyk and prove that you are in Ukraine!

Turn on the live broadcast on all social networks, kneel down, you faggot, and ask forgiveness from every mother from whom you took a son! Because you are not going to negotiate with Russia, because you are not sitting down at the negotiating table with Putin, because you are fighting until the last Ukrainian and because you are still bombing Donbass! You stinking faggot!!!”



it’s about the God damn Americans , US hegemony , their war on Russia . The CIA worked hard in Ukraine , in cahoots with the Nazis and western NGO’s , Soro’s pals , , to open old wounds, to create hate and to bring out the worst in people , those devils are good at it .. This was not a grassroots / natural occurrence. This war started with the coup in 2014 , US financed, US instigated. When the US overthrew the legitimate democratically elected government and installed their puppets . It was planned long before the coup took place .

Don’t forget the British.



http://https://s4.cdnstatic.space/wp...lensky.mp4?_=1


SOUTHFRONT



Zelenksy is 'stage managed' by the CIA but sooner or later he'll pass his sell by date and get the 'Lubianka' treatment.
 
Old February 26th, 2023 #37
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default Invasion of Ukraine Caused by EU, NATO Expansion: Farage


‘Abhorrent’ Invasion of Ukraine Caused by EU, NATO Expansion: Farage


Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine a year ago was an “abhorrent” but “entirely predictable” result of European Union and NATO expansionism, according to Nigel Farage.

The Brexit champion marked the one-year anniversary of the February 24th invasion of Ukraine in 2022 by recalling his warnings against the West entangling itself in Eastern European geopolitics following the Euromaidan in Kyiv (Kiev) in 2014.

Farage, who was a serving Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) when Russia annexed Crimea and unofficially intervened in the Donbas (Donbass) on the side of pro-Russia separatists in response to the Western-backed Euromaidan coup against then-Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, reiterated that the 2022 invasion was “totally abhorrent” but hardly unforeseeable.

“I warned in 2014 that EU and NATO expansion would lead to war,” he said, supporting his assertion with a clip of him voicing his concerns in the European Parliament at the time. “[W]e are rushing through an Association Agreement at undue speed with the Ukraine, and as we speak there are NATO soldiers engaged in military exercises in the Ukraine,” he can be heard saying in the clip. “Have we taken leave of our senses? Do we actually want to have a war with Putin?” he demands. “Because if we do, we are certainly going about it the right way,” he adds.

While many believe Russia’s “special military operation”, as it terms its war on Ukraine, has naked imperialism as its object, President Putin’s official justification alleges that, among other things, it could not risk allowing its increasingly NATO-tied neighbour to continue building its military capacity and integrating with the Western alliance.

The EU Association Agreement referred to by Farage, meanwhile, had initially been rejected by Yanukovych, whose electoral power base was in the Donbas, after Russia made what his government saw as a better offer, and the fact that it was revived after he was driven from the Ukrainian capital by an armed mob was seen by some as an example of the EU going beyond the bounds of normal politics to get its way.

European Union interests during the Maidan may not have entirely aligned with those of the Barack Obama administration in the United States, however, as indicated by then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland — now Joe Biden’s Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs — making her infamous “fuck the EU” remarks in a leaked phone call at the time.



“Have we taken leave of our senses? Do we actually want to have a war with Putin?” he demands. “Because if we do, we are certainly going about it the right way,”

Putting aside the proverbial "we"......Yes. Yes and Indeed.

They DID want a war. The DID keep on pushing. They DID meddle in the affairs of that region. They DID want to get shut of Russia's gas pipelines. They DID do the exact opposite of what was promised to Russia back in the early 1990s. They DID want to get rid of Russia and the BRICS nations challenging the dollar as the defacto trading currency. They DID want "regime change" in Russia. They DID spread propaganda for four years about Russian interference and Donald Trump that was completely fabricated in order to prime the American people for fighting with Russia. They DID want to cause destabilisation and desperation on Western Europe via fuel crisis and food crisis and refugee crisis so that they'd be forced to fight with Russia. They DID make Ukraine a member of NATO in all but a signatory, with special conditions that give them all the things of full membership. They DID want to have command of military bases in the region. They DID want to feed the military machine and globalist mega-corporations like Blackrock, Google, Amazon, and many other WEF stooges to "rebuild" Ukraine to a WEF/Davos driven digital and societal template.

Putin and Russia are no angels, but anybody who believes NATO and the deep state American government, the British government and the EU are some kind of saints who are just "stepping in" to "defend Ukraine" from "Russian aggression" are utter simpletons who are being played like a fiddle yet again, just like with Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and elsewhere.

Nuland is in Moldova right now trying to get another color revolution going.



‘Abhorrent’ Invasion of Ukraine Caused by EU, NATO Expansion: Farage 26 II 2023.


Cooperate owned Western Media discretely push biased anti-Russian hysteria the same way they pushed anti-German hysteria to bring about WW2 .
 
Old February 27th, 2023 #38
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default Grandson of Charles de Gaulle Condemns West’s Policy in Ukraine


Pierre de Gaulle, a grandson of former French President Charles de Gaulle, has said the U.S. is making Europeans suffer by fueling the Ukraine conflict and waging a pre-planned economic war against Russia.



A corporate consultant and bank manager, Pierre told The Franco-Russian Dialogue Association on December 26: “I revolt and protest this intellectual dishonesty in the Ukraine crisis because the triggers of the war are the Americans and NATO. The United States unfortunately continues the military escalation, making not only the Ukrainian population suffer, but the European population as well.”


Pierre continued: “The scale and the number of sanctions show that all of this was organized a long time in advance. It is an economic war, from which the Americans are the beneficiaries. The Americans sell their gas to Europeans for a price four to seven times higher than they do in their own country.”


According to Pierre, “public opinion in France is beginning to understand what the evil game of the Americans is today. By using lies, . . .the United States has managed to use the Ukrainian crisis to destabilize Europe. The Americans, as it were, cut off Europe from Russia, set the Europeans against the Russians. Why would they do that? Because Europe in alliance with Russia could be a strong bloc both politically and economically, culturally and socially…Ever since the Vietnam War and the economic crises that followed, Americans have always tried by force, cunning and other dishonest means to make up for the loss of their economic and political influence, although it is inevitable. In particular, Americans are trying to slow down the dollar’s loss of its status as the only…world exchange currency. And this policy continues.”


Target of the CIA

Charles de Gaulle was a hero of the French resistance against the German occupation during World War II who went on to serve as French president from 1959 to 1969. The CIA has declassified documents revealing that the Agency was involved in a plot in 1965 to kill de Gaulle, who had angered the Johnson administration by opposing the Vietnam War and throwing U.S. servicemen off French military bases.


De Gaulle had also pursued a progressive policy toward the Soviet Union, withdrawing French forces from NATO in 1966 and opening up negotiations with Soviet leaders, visiting Moscow numerous times and signing a trade agreement with the Soviets.


$54 Billion for Ukraine While America’s Millions Suffer in Poverty

After a failed assassination attempt in 1961, right-wing military officers who hated de Gaulle for relinquishing French control over Algeria, approached the CIA and developed an assassination plot that involved infiltrating an agent wearing a poisoned ring into a group of old soldiers attending a reception at which de Gaulle would appear.

When de Gaulle gestured to shake his hand, the general would fall to the ground while the assassin strolled calmly off into the crowd.

Restoring Grandpa Charles’s Vision

In a speech on the national day of the Russian Federation in June at the Russian embassy in Paris, Pierre de Gaulle noted how Russia had been seen by his grandfather as an indispensable ally whose friendship would contribute to the stability of Europe.

“The General [his grandfather] even said ‘Napoleon’s disastrous decision to attack [Czar] Alexander I is the biggest mistake he ever made. Nothing forced him to do so. It was contrary to our interests, to our traditions, to our genius. It is from the war between Napoleon and the Russians that our decadence dates.’”


France’s greatest folly: Napoleon’s army retreating in the Russian snow.


Emphasizing how the Russian and French people were linked together “by long years of friendship and by the blood shed against the Germans,” Pierre stated that he had come here to “affirm once again, loud and clear, that it is in France’s interest to maintain good relations with Russia and to say that we must work together in order to help the union and security of our continent, as well as the balance, progress, and peace of the entire world.”


In Pierre’s view, the “systematic and blind policy of confiscation and discrimination directed against the entire Russian people” [reference to sanctions] was “scandalous.” French elites had betrayed his grandfather’s legacy by siding with the U.S. and NATO and the “reckless” and “condemnable policy of the Ukrainian government towards the Russian-speaking population of Donbas, [which involved] discrimination, plundering, embargoes and bombings.”


The West, according to Pierre, has “allowed Zelensky, his oligarchs and the neo-Nazi military groups to be trapped in a spiral of war,” with their “blindness having serious consequences for the Ukrainian people. But let’s make no mistake. What do the Americans want, if not to provoke a new East-West confrontation, whose only goal is to weaken and divide Europe in order to impose their directive, their economy, and their system.”


Pierre further noted that the Americans have “never accepted, nor the West with them, that after the difficult transition of 1991 and the reconstruction that followed, Russia would not fit into their unipolar world…nor that Russia should transform itself according to the Western model—in its own way. Because of this, and from the beginning, President Putin was perceived as a dictator, whereas he is a great leader for his country!”


The United States, Pierre continued, “has also never accepted the loss of the role of the dollar as the dominant currency in the settlement of international trade in the world.”


Pierre’s words are heretical to American ears and those of the French ruling elite; however, they present a wonderful and realistic vision that progressive movements should embrace.


Pierre ended his speech by noting that his grandfather loved Russia and “always supported and defended the imperative need, even in the most difficult moments of history, to build and preserve a strong and shared relationship with Russia. Allow me to quote General de Gaulle once again: ‘In France, we have never considered Russia an enemy. I am for the development of Franco-Russian friendship; and I have never sent and I will never send arms to people who would have fought against Soviet Russia.’”



Grandson of Charles de Gaulle, an Old CIA Nemesis, Condemns West’s Policy in Ukraine 27 II 2023.


GB News recently stated 80% of people in the USA did not support this 'proxy' Ukraine War against Russia.
Western Media would have us think there's 100% support for the 'proxy' Ukraine War against Russia.
 
Old February 28th, 2023 #39
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default You Should Thank this Russian Naval Officer that You and Your Loved Ones Are Alive Today



Let’s hope there are more Vasily Arkhipovs out there today—we need them now more than ever.

On October 27, 1962, Soviet naval officer Vasily Arkhipov helped prevent the outbreak of World War III and saved humanity from nuclear catastrophe. A minesweeper during the Pacific War, Arkhipov was the commander of a diesel submarine that had been sent by Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to escort merchant ships bound for Cuba, which were equipped with a torpedo boat armed with a nuclear warhead.

On October 14, 1962, a U.S. spy plane flying over Cuba had revealed that the Soviet Union was building ramps for the installation of missiles with nuclear warheads, in retaliation for the United States deploying missiles with nuclear warheads capable of striking the Soviet Union in Italy, at Gioia del Colle (Apulia in southern Italy), and in Turkey.

President Kennedy’s imposition of a naval blockade after the spy plane discovery triggered the 13-day Cuban Missile Crisis, during which time the submarine that Arkhipov commanded was being pursued by U.S. destroyers which, using depth charges, were trying to force Arkhipov’s submarine to the surface.


After the Soviet sub’s ventilation system broke down and communication was cut, the captain of the Soviet submarine group, Valentin Grigoryevich Savitsky, was convinced that war had broken out. Not wanting to sink without a fight, he decided to launch a nuclear warhead at the aircraft carrier pursuing his sub. The political officer, Ivan Semyonovich Maslennikov, agreed with the captain, but on the flagship B-59, Arkhipov’s consent was also needed, and he objected, convincing Savitsky ultimately to do the same.[1]


Arkhipov’s persuasion averted a nuclear war, whose consequences would have been horrific. After surfacing, Arkhipov’s sub was fired on by Americans but was able to return to the Soviet Union safely. Spooked about how the world had come so close to the nuclear brink, President Kennedy gave a speech at American University in June 1963, five months before his assassination, calling for a “reexamin[ation of the U.S.] attitude towards the Soviet Union” and “Cold War” and for the U.S. and Soviets to work together for a “just and genuine peace” and to “halt the arms race.” “Confident and unafraid,” Kennedy concluded, “we must labor on—not towards a strategy of annihilation but towards a strategy of peace.”


Another Grave Moment of Danger

Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara was not mincing his words when he said years after the events that “We came very, very close [to nuclear war during the Cuban missile crisis,] closer than we knew at the time.” Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., characterized the period of the Cuban Missile Crisis as “not only the most dangerous moment of the Cold War [but] the most dangerous moment in human history.”

That moment of danger unfortunately appears just as sharp today. Time magazine reported in late October that Russia’s launching of missile strikes targeting energy plants within Ukraine and civilian infrastructure “triggered fears that hostilities were escalating and inching closer to nuclear war.”

The U.S. had stoked the fire by a) engaging in provocative military drills testing the handling of thermonuclear bombs; b) delivering bombers to Europe equipped with low-yield tactical nuclear weapons; and c) carrying out acts of international terrorism such as the sinking of the flagship vessel of the Russian Black Sea Fleet called the Moskva that prompted Russian President Vladimir Putin to place Russia on high nuclear alert.

The U.S. was generally the one to provoke a new Cold War with Russia by a) expanding NATO towards Russia’s border; b) imposing economic sanctions on it under fraudulent pretexts; c) and then backing a coup in Ukraine that triggered the conflict in eastern Ukraine which has evolved into a proxy war.[2] In October 2018, the Trump administration pulled the U.S. out of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) agreement, characterized by former U.S. ambassador to Russia Jon Huntsman, Jr., as “probably the most successful treaty in the history of arms control.”[3]

Carl J. Richard, head of the U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) which oversees the nation’s nuclear arsenal, wrote in the U.S. Naval Institute’s monthly magazine subsequently that the U.S. military had to “shift its principal assumption from ‘nuclear employment is not possible’ to ‘nuclear employment is a very real possibility,’” in the face of threats from Russia and China.

Richard’s successor, Anthony J. Cotton, said just as ominously during his confirmation hearing in September that his job was to prepare the 150,000 men and women under his command to deploy nuclear weapons, and that the president should have flexible nuclear options. Both Richard and Cotton appear to be of the opposite character of Arkhipov, whose level-headedness under pressure and commitment to peace between the U.S. and Russia needs to be remembered at this time. In a deeply Russophobic climate, Arkhipov should remind us also not to associate Russians with the stereotyped qualities promoted about them in Hollywood films—and in the ravings of Pentagon war planners and politicians who have led us into another grave crisis.


1 See Ron Ridenour, The Russian Peace Threat: Pentagon on Alert (New York: Punto Press, 2018), chapter 5. ↑

2 See Jeremy Kuzmarov and John Marciano, The Russians are Coming, Again: The First Cold War as Tragedy, the Second as Farce (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2018). ↑

3 See Scott Ritter, Disarmament in the Time of Perestroika: Arms Control and the End of the Soviet Union (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2022) on the lost promise of the disarmament treaties of the late Cold War era. ↑

You Should Thank this Russian Naval Officer that You and Your Loved Ones Are Alive Today
28 II 2023.


Its all inter related: Open borders and the 'great replacement', Covid pandemic, postal votes, China Joe, Inflation to Arm and finance the Ukies for a proxy war to break up Russia and the big Media SELL. Careful What You Wish for.
 
Old March 6th, 2023 #40
jagd messer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,356
Default





 
Reply

Tags
crypsis global

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.
Page generated in 1.29012 seconds.