|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
January 15th, 2023 | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Holocaust News: News about French Revisionist Vincent Reynouard from His Scottish Prison Cell January 10, 5:15 p.m.: Three men in uniforms burst into the cell. Gosho (prison cell gook mate) who is having a nap has to get up. I am led outside. Three women and a man stand outside the door. Seven people? Hell, this is serious. “Search the cell,” I am told. Gosho comes out, we bring in. The, I undergo a body search: my clothes that I had to remove completely, are inspected. Once dressed, Gosho and I sat facing the cell door to assist in the search. I see nothing, but the noises tell me that everything is inspected after being turned over, emptied, turned upside down. The boxes filled with our belongings are taken out and their contents carefully checked. I bend down to look in the cell: our beds are turned upside down, the homemade hooks to hang our jackets ripped off and thrown in the trash. Our shelves made with a hundred packs of cigarettes are emptied and taken out for checks. Fragile, they break and end up in the garbage: all the storage in the office is compromised. Deemed useless, empty boxes that we kept for later storage are thrown out. Suddenly, a roll of toilet paper comes through the door rolling gently on the floor, as if coming out of its own accord to escape the storm. I burst out laughing. Two cell phones seized The search lasts more than an hour. It allows two cell phones to be seized: Gosho's, whose seal preventing the SIM card from being replaced has disappeared, and another, found I don't know where, carrying a SIM card from outside. I was unaware of his presence in the cell. No doubt it was among the belongings left by a former prisoner. Anyway, the two devices are placed in two numbered plastic bags. Mine, on the other hand, is left to me, because it is in order. However, the team seized two sketches of the prison discovered among my drawings: they too are slipped into a bag. Reintroduced into the cell after the team's departure, Gosho and I remain dumbfounded: it looks like a tornado has passed. Clothes, pencils, shoes, towels, drawing paper, dishes… everything is piled up on our beds in the greatest disorder. On the desk, the belongings previously stored in the broken shelves lie mixed up. In this small cell, it will take us three and a half hours to sort, put away and reorganize everything as well as possible. Why this excavation? The team told me it was a routine search of a random cell. I doubt it, and other inmates as well. In my opinion, "one" suspects me of using an illegal telephone, in order to grant interviews to Rivarol: the one who presented my new work on Oradour undoubtedly offended the guardians of Memory. Unable to silence me, they try to harm me by all means. The interview appeared at the start of the Christmas holidays, the search took place a week after the start of the school year: I find it difficult to see it as a coincidence. The French authorities know that the illegal use of a telephone in prison is severely punished: here, prisoners informed me that such an offense could be punished by six months in prison, not counting the additional sanctions and all the inconveniences possible for the convicted prisoner. Punished like children For now, Gosho and I are punished like children caught in the jam jar: we are deprived of morning outings for seven days. From 9 a.m. to 10 a.m., our cell remains closed. However, I believe that the illegal SIM card discovered in the third phone will be analyzed, in order to determine the calls made with this device. If the user can be identified, they will receive a much heavier punishment. However, here again, the French authorities will fail, because I have never touched this phone or any other that would be equipped with an illegal SIM card. So they will try by all means to have me extradited. Information on the “context of the video” On January 12, I appeared before the court responsible for deciding on my extradition. The public prosecutor (which supports France's request) has requested a postponement of the hearing on the grounds that it is waiting for information from the French courts on the "context of the video" which earned me the 2015 conviction for which my extradition is demanded. Why this request? No doubt because, obviously and contrary to the allegations of the French authorities, this video does not call for racial hatred or violence. As a reminder, this video denounced the ideological recruitment of youth using lies rehashed since 1945. Knowing therefore that I was condemned for revisionism (and not for incitement to racial hatred), the public prosecutor seems to want to prove that I acted out of anti-Semitism. This is what he calls the “context of the video”. I trust in Providence Will the maneuver succeed? My solicitor thinks not, because in Scottish law it is the tort itself that counts, not the motives, whatever they may be. I was convicted of “Holocaust denial”, regardless of my real or supposed motives. Revisionism being legal in Scotland, my extradition should therefore be refused. Will it be? We will find out on February 9, when the hearing was postponed. Initially, the postponement was set for February 23. What does this eagerness mean? In my eyes, it is without interest: as usual, I trust in Providence. In prison or in freedom, I have plans full in the head. I leave the rest in God's hands. Source (in french): https://blogue.sansconcession.org/20...-du-12-janvier |
February 8th, 2023 | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
News from V. Reynouard and the revisionist struggle
On February 18, that is to say in 10 days, Vincent Reynouard will celebrate his 54th birthday in Edinburgh prison. Let's all take the time to send him a little birthday card, to show him our support and our gratitude. Mr. Reynouard will answer each one personally, and will accompany his answer with a drawing. If you would like a response, please write your mailing address on the inside of the card. As a reminder, the postal address of Mr. Reynouard is as follows: 160071 V Reynouard Glenesk 3/11 HM Prison Edinburgh 33 Stenhouse Road EDINBURGH EH11 3LN United Kingdom (UK) |
February 10th, 2023 | #23 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Quote:
From the Blog Sans Concession Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by alex revision; February 10th, 2023 at 04:47 AM. |
|||
March 10th, 2023 | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Quote:
|
|
April 21st, 2023 | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Vincent Reynouard: Holocaust denier’s extradition hearing delayed 20th April 2023 A preliminary extradition hearing for a Holocaust denier wanted by authorities in France has been delayed for a further four weeks. Edinburgh Sheriff Court heard the delay will allow videos Vincent Reynouard is alleged to have made to be translated into English, as well as work out what offences, if any, he has committed under Scots law. Reynouard, 54, was convicted under anti-Nazi laws across the Channel. He was handed a four-month jail term in November 2020 and a further six months in January 2021. He appeared before Sheriff Frank Crowe on Thursday by video-link from HMP Edinburgh. He does not consent to his extradition back to France. His lawyer Paul Dunne asked the court if the preliminary hearing in his extradition case could be moved to May 18 as one of two YouTube videos Reynouard is alleged to have made has not yet been translated from French into English. One of the transcripts was made available on Thursday morning, prior to the hearing. Mr Dunne also said Holocaust denial is not an offence in Scotland. He told the court: “We cannot definitively say whether we are dealing with Scottish offending here.” Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990, and Reynouard has been convicted on numerous occasions. Reynouard fled to Scotland following his latest conviction for a series of antisemitic Facebook posts. A further preliminary hearing has been set in Edinburgh for May 18 before a full extradition hearing on June 8. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...aring-delayed/
__________________
Last edited by alex revision; April 22nd, 2023 at 03:10 AM. |
April 22nd, 2023 | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
|
|
June 8th, 2023 | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Holocaust denier Vincent Reynouard has extradition hearing delayed
8th June, 2023 AN extradition hearing for a Holocaust denier wanted by French police and found hiding in Scotland has been postponed again. Vincent Reynouard was arrested in Anstruther, Fife, in November last year then remanded in custody after crossing the Channel in a bid to evade the French authorities, who have been pursuing him for two years. The 54-year-old went on the run after he was convicted under anti-Nazi laws and handed a four-month jail sentence in November 2020, then a further six-month spell in January the following year. Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990 and Reynouard has been convicted numerous times. A full extradition hearing was supposed to get under way at Edinburgh Sheriff Court earlier this year but lawyer Paul Dunne pushed for this to be postponed to allow videos Reynouard is alleged to have made to be translated into English. When the case called again at the court on Thursday, Dunne requested a further postponement, insisting certain “legal issues” understood to relate to the two arrest warrants issued by the French authorities had to be debated first. He said another advocate specialising in extradition, Fred Mackintosh KC, is unable to come to court until the start of July at the earliest, and he asked for the full extradition hearing to be pushed back to later that month. Sheriff Kenneth Campbell agreed to reschedule the full hearing for July 27, and he set a further preliminary hearing for July 13. He also called for written submissions pertaining to the case to be handed in a week beforehand. https://www.thenational.scot/news/23...aring-delayed/ |
July 13th, 2023 | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Holocaust denier facing extradition to France has hearing moved to October
July 13, 2023 The extradition hearing of a Holocaust denier wanted by authorities in France has been pushed back until later this year. Vincent Reynouard’s lawyer told Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday he no longer wished to proceed with a legal debate he had been due to go through concerning the Frenchman’s case and moved to set a date for a full hearing. Reynouard was arrested in Fife then remanded in custody last year after crossing the Channel to evade French authorities who had been pursuing him for two years. The 54-year-old went on the run after he was convicted under anti-Nazi laws and handed a four-month jail sentence in November 2020, then a further six-month spell in January the following year. Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990 and Reynouard has been convicted on multiple occasions. Appearing before Sheriff Frank Crowe, Reynouard’s lawyer Paul Dunne said the contents of a note passed to the court by another lawyer acting on Reynouard’s behalf did not need to be debated any more and moved to have the note withdrawn. He went on to call for a full hearing date to be fixed and this was set for October 19 with a further preliminary hearing also scheduled for September 21. Mr Dunne also requested the court to clarify how long Reynouard was supposed to spend in prison to complete his sentence before the hearing, pointing out he has been in custody since he was first held by police in November last year. https://www.inverness-courier.co.uk/...october-83409/ |
September 22nd, 2023 | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
French Holocaust denier hiding in Scotland made 'appalling' YouTube videos, court hears
Vincent Reynouard appeared at Edinburgh Sheriff Court to face extradition to France over the hateful views he spouted online. 21 SEP 2023 A sheriff has been urged to order the extradition of a French Holocaust denier who was hiding out in Scotland. Vincent Reynouard made a string of YouTube videos where he denied the Holocaust and spouted anti-Semitic hatred. The 54-year-old is wanted in France under anti-Nazi laws and authorities in his homeland sought his extradition. A full extradition hearing was held at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday with Reynouard appearing in the dock from custody. Reynouard was detained in the Anstruther area of Fife last November on an arrest warrant. Advocate depute Paul Harvey told the hearing that Reynouard’s videos displayed the “most appalling anti-Semitism”. Mr Harvey said the words spoken in each of eight videos would constitute a breach of the peace under Scottish law. Reynouard would need to have committed a crime which is also an offence under Scots law to meet the test for extradition. But Fred Mackintosh KC, defending Reynouard, said Reynouard’s videos didn’t constitute a breach of the peace as there was no call for action by others. Sheriff Chris Dickson set a further hearing for October 20 when he hoped to deliver his verdict in the extradition battle. The court heard Reynouard produced vile videos on subjects such as “the Jewish problem” and denied both the Holocaust and that there were gas chambers at the Auschwitz concentration camp. Mr Harvey said there was no need under Scottish law for a breach of the peace to require a direct call to action. The prosecutor said putting the videos on YouTube created a “greater risk of serious disturbance” as they were “more widely and permanently available” on the internet. Mr Harvey added the videos violated the Communications Act as they were “grossly offensive” and met the test for that offence as well. In his submission, Mr MacIntosh said Reynouard’s videos didn’t constitute a breach of the peace as “he does not call for any action”. Mr MacIntosh said “Holocaust denial per se” was not a crime in the UK, and the videos contained “no encouragement of other people to act”. He added it was a “sad reality” that denying the Holocaust was a “feature of our society”. Mr MacIntosh said Reynouard’s actions would be “unlikely” to attract a prison sentence in Scotland so it would be “disproportionate to extradite him”. The Frenchman was convicted under anti-Nazi laws across the Channel and handed a four-month jail term in November 2020, and a further six months in January 2021. Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990, and Reynouard has been convicted on numerous occasions. The French were seeking Reynouard on two warrants. The extradition hearing was told the first warrant was being discharged as the French considered Reynouard to have served his sentence for it inside a Scottish prison. The French press has claimed Reynouard had been working as a private tutor while living under a false identity while in the UK. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/s...tland-30997726 |
October 12th, 2023 | #30 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
November 13th, 2023 | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Quote:
|
|
November 13th, 2023 | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,749
|
The genocidal monsters who call themselves kikes would not be so fanatical about persecuting reputable scholars to the end of the earth if they were confident their Holohoax bullshit would hold up to scrutiny.
__________________
Smash jewish supremacy. Smash globalism. Smash ZOG. Use ad blockers at all times to starve off the (((beast))). |
January 15th, 2024 | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Real History in the dock: Vincent Reynouard’s appeal heard in Edinburgh January 14, 2024 The appeal hearing in the case of Vincent Reynouard was heard in Edinburgh on Thursday, 11th January 2024 before a panel of judges of the High Court of Justiciary. Regular readers will remember that Vincent was arrested fourteen months ago and has been held in Edinburgh jail ever since, despite not being charged (let alone convicted) of any crime against UK laws. The French authorities are seeking his extradition under their notorious ‘Gayssot Law’ which forbids any questioning of historical orthodoxy regarding the ‘Holocaust’ and certain other alleged events of the Second World War. Here is a translation of Vincent’s report which first appeared in French at Vincent’s website – the report is also now available translated into German and Spanish. My lawyer was more incisive that in the trial at first instance. After recalling that the videos that are the target of French prosecutors mainly dealt with the Holocaust, he emphasised that I challenge official history with rational arguments, without polemicising. Then he came to the fourth video, which deals with the Jewish question. “Mr. Reynouard,” he said, “declares himself in agreement with Hitler on the existence of a Jewish problem. This statement may shock, even alarm. However, when he claims to go further than Hitler, it is not to incite murder, quite the contrary. My client explains that going further in his reflections, he deduces that the Jewish problem arises from the faults from which our societies suffer (loss of spirituality, hedonism, etc.). “The sentence which states this was omitted from the arrest warrant on which the trial judge relied. However, it is crucial, because it explains that my client does not advocate the genocide of the Jews or the eradication of Judaism. At first instance, the judge also recognised that Mr Reynouard was not calling for the extermination of the Jews. “I add that, unlike Alison Chabloz, my client is neither satirical nor sarcastic: his speech is calm and thoughtful.” At this point, a judge intervenes to declare that the assertion that Hitler was right to denounce a Jewish problem was itself grossly offensive. My lawyer replied that the message should be judged not by extracting a few statements, but by considering its totality. Then, he recalled that the United Kingdom had refused to criminalise revisionism. “Mr. Reynouard,” he concluded, “is a revisionist. He is being prosecuted for this reason. Ordering his extradition by invoking Section 127 of the Communications Act — a section that was originally intended to crack down on obscene telephone calls — would be an abuse of that law.” Speaking in his turn, the prosecutor said: “Mr. Reynouard not only denies the Holocaust; he also disputes the massacre of Oradour by the SS, which left 643 victims.” With this allegation, the prosecutor wanted to present me as a madman who denies the deaths of civilians, which I never did. The aim of this dishonest manoeuvre was to undermine the defence contention that I rely on rational arguments. The prosecutor continued by asserting that the trial judge had correctly analysed the grossly offensive nature of my videos, but he did not dare to claim that by declaring that I went further than Hitler, I was manifesting “terrible anti-Semitism”, because that would have been really too ridiculous. Then, he considered the question of whether I’d had committed a breach of public order law. We remember that at first instance, the judge dismissed this accusation. The prosecutor maintained that this was an error: “There is a risk that the videos targeted by French prosecutors could be viewed by a certain section of the public who, after listening to Mr Reynouard, will be incited to perpetrate anti-Semitic acts.” Here we recognise the main argument of the opponents of freedom of expression: “You can express yourself freely, provided that your words do not risk inciting hatred among certain people.” My lawyer replied that in my videos, I did not call on anyone to act, but that I encouraged viewers to think by providing them with food for thought, which is unrelated to the sort of violent messages, such as racist insults, satirical-sarcastic songs, shouting and unambiguous gestures, which are ordinarily judged as undermining public order. The judges will make their decision on February 1st. At the end of this hearing, I will not hazard any predictions, for one simple reason: everything will happen in the heads of these three judges whose state of mind I do not know. In reaching their judgment, they will have the choice. If, out of respect for freedom of expression, they wish to release me, then they will accept the Defence arguments. Otherwise, they will favour those of the Prosecution. They will not have to answer for their decisions, at least in this life. However, I remain calm, because whatever the outcome, I will serve the revisionist cause. Some say that I would be more useful in freedom than in prison. I think that’s not necessarily the case. Suffering repression also allows us to bear witness to the truth. Future generations will note: “He put forward rational arguments and offered fair debate; they pursued him as far as a remote corner of Scotland and gagged him.” The facts will lead to inescapable conclusions. Shortly before boarding the prison bus, a guard whispered to me: “You are a hero. Yes, a hero.” I don’t think I’m one; I consider myself a man who fulfils his duty to his people. However, this mark of respect coming from a simple civil servant touched me. I see it as a sign from Providence which indicates to me that, in the shadows, my work is spreading and revisionism is progressing. I will never give in. Thanks again to everyone who supports me. https://jailingopinions.com/realhist...-in-edinburgh/ |
January 16th, 2024 | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 4,248
|
Quote:
__________________
When your world has been hijacked by parasitic pathogens,
immune response becomes 'hate' and immunodeficiency 'progress' |
|
January 27th, 2024 | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Vincent Reynouard’s Edinburgh appeal rejected as French courts seek to jail revisionist scholar
January 26, 2024 This afternoon in Edinburgh the President of the Court of Session, Lord Carloway, rejected the appeal against extradition to France of Vincent Reynouard, the exiled scholar whom Parisian courts seek to jail for his research questioning orthodox history of the ‘Holocaust’ and the ‘massacre at Oradour’. Regular readers of this blog will be familiar with the background to the case. Vincent was arrested in the Scottish fishing village of Anstruther in November 2023 and has been held in Edinburgh jail for the past fourteen months, despite not being charged (let alone convicted) of any crime under UK law. France is one of many European countries which criminalise any historical and scientific research questioning the orthodox version of the ‘Holocaust’: the alleged murder of six million Jews in presumed homicidal gas chambers during the Second World War. But Parliament has deliberately avoided passing any such law in the UK. Instead, UK courts – including now Lord Carloway, Scotland’s most senior judge – are engaged in a cowardly criminalisation of revisionism via abuse of other laws such as the Communications Act, and via abuse of the extradition process. This conveniently avoids any parliamentary debate on the merits of the revisionist case. Though the historicity of the ‘Holocaust’ was not a legal point at issue during the trial, and though he has not indicated any competence of his own on historical matters, Lord Carloway assumes the right to declaim on “the patent falsehood” of Vincent’s work. Lord Carloway makes statements about the Auschwitz death toll and about the notorious ‘confession’ of camp commandant Rudolf Höss, though no expert witness testimony was adduced at any stage of Vincent’s extradition process about these matters. Lord Carloway does not himself claim personal expertise in 20th century history and does not indicate that he has carried out even a single hour of documentary research on such topics. Notably he relies on the Höss ‘confession’. In what other case would Lord Carloway be happy for a Scottish court to rely on a ‘confession’ obtained by torture and blackmail, or on submissions concerning the scene of the crime that were provided by the Kremlin’s military and intelligence services? The version of history laid down by the Nuremberg trial – instituted by the victors of the Second World War, and largely based on ‘evidence’ by a Kremlin-controlled ‘commission’ – is protected in France by the ‘Gayssot Law’ enacted in 1990, appropriately enough on the initiative of a French Communist MP allied to a millionaire Jewish socialist. This ‘Gayssot Law’ was designed to criminalise the work of the pioneering revisionist scholar Professor Robert Faurisson, who though born in Shepperton, West London, to a Scottish mother and French father, lived and taught in France throughout his adult life, latterly as Professor of French Literature at the University of Lyon. From the mid-1970s until the day before his death in 2018, Professor Faurisson wrote and published detailed research into the alleged ‘gas chambers’, summarising his conclusions in a famous sentence: “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.” It is a curious coincidence that the Court of Session judgment rejecting Vincent Reynouard’s appeal was delivered one day after Professor Faurisson’s birthday, and a few hours before what has in recent years become a worldwide festival of historical ‘remembrance’ – Holocaust Memorial Day. In 1995 Faurisson directly addressed “Auschwitz: the facts and the legend” in an essay now available online at the Robert Faurisson website. Vincent Reynouard spoke at the conference in October 2018 – held in Shepperton, the Professor’s birthplace – at which Robert Faurisson gave his final speech, a day before his death. Vincent (who was awarded the Robert Faurisson International Prize in 2020) is today’s leading representative of the Faurissonian tradition of scholarly re-examination of the ‘Holocaust”s evidential basis, while the courts (both in Paris and now sadly in Edinburgh) have abandoned scrutiny of evidence and now prefer to genuflect in submission to ‘Holocaustianity’. Most of the Western world has moved away from organised religion, but ‘Holocaust’ memorialisation has become a pseudo-religion, with Auschwitz-Birkenau as its Calvary and anti-revisionist legislation as the new blasphemy laws. Though the UK has no such laws, Lord Carloway affirms in his judgment that Vincent’s online publications are extraditable offences because they can be deemed “grossly offensive” under s.127 of the Communications Act 2007. This is an updating for the internet age of a law originally designed to criminalise obscene telephone calls. In this instance, the law has been stretched to cover offending “members of the Jewish and other communities whose members perished at Auschwitz and Birkenau. The same applies to those living with the memory of Oradour. It is not necessary to be a member of the relevant communities to be grossly offended by such statements; any reasonable person would be.” Lord Carloway makes the dire implications clear: “Although it is not an offence to hold these views and, in certain contexts, to express them, it is a breach of section 127 of the 2007 Act to communicate them to the public on the internet.” By Lord Carloway’s implication, online revisionism is to be deemed criminal in the UK, even when expressed in scholarly terms, and even without a specific parliamentary statute. This is a blatant attack on fundamental human rights: an attack on the basic principles not only of UK law but of European civilisation’s accepted intellectual standards. We shall report soon on the next stage in the fight for Vincent Reynouard’s freedom and the fight for real history. https://jailingopinions.com/realhist...onist-scholar/ |
February 1st, 2024 | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Vincent Reynouard faces extradition with courage and confidence in the future of revisionism February 1, 2024 The French revisionist scholar Vincent Reynouard, who has been held in Edinburgh prison since his arrest in November 2022, will be extradited to France next week after it became clear that there was no further avenue of appeal. (The photo above shows the late Richard Edmonds presenting Vincent with the Robert Faurisson International Prize 2020.) [url=https://realhistory.info/2024/01/26/vincent-reynouards-edinburgh-appeal-rejected-as-french-courts-seek-to-jail-revisionist-scholar/As we reported a few days ago[/url], Scotland’s most senior judge rejected Vincent’s appeal after a hearing at Edinburgh’s High Court of Justiciary. Although Scotland remains part of the United Kingdom, the UK Supreme Court in London has no jurisdiction in his case. Vincent Reynouard issued a statement at his blog yesterday. (English translation below) The news of my upcoming extradition having spread, correspondents wrote to me to tell me that I must be disappointed and undoubtedly demoralised. I thank them and reassure them: I am neither. When, on the evening of January 26th, a fellow inmate informed me that Scottish television had announced the High Court’s decision, I was making a watercolour for the widow of the revisionist Carlos Porter. After asking my informant a few questions, I quietly got back to work. Disappointment and demoralisation are consequences of our personal desires. Now, personally, I don’t want anything. I fulfil my mission by spreading revisionism. When I physically die, I will be rewarded for it. For their part, do my contemporaries deserve the truth? If so, then I will see my work bear fruit. Otherwise, the seeds sown will germinate after my death, or perhaps never. I can’t do anything about it; It’s God’s business, not mine. Here in Edinburgh Prison, my life has not changed one bit. In the calm of my cell, I write, I read, I draw and I meditate. Far from appearing as a fearsome spectre, the upcoming extradition presents itself as a simple door opening onto the future, a continuation which, if the ordeals are experienced positively, will prove enriching. Hence my serenity. Last thing: according to the BBC, the High Court magistrates stressed that in the current context, all my videos were “grossly offensive” to all citizens of a modern society. Proof of the importance of World War II revisionism: it leaves no one indifferent. I had noted this for a long time. For revisionism, it is a great victory. So why would I be disappointed or demoralized? Thank you to you who support me. Vincent Reynouard We shall continue to report on Vincent’s case, and on the broader revisionist struggle. It appears that the UK is to be the new frontline for attempts to criminalise revisionism. If so, our enemies should be warned that there will be no surrender. https://jailingopinions.com/realhist...f-revisionism/ |
February 1st, 2024 | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 4,248
|
Thus "free speech" is sacred and above discussion only for the lesbian anti-Putin agitators of Pussy Riot and the boomer Marxist propagandists of Charlie Hebdo, it seems...
Where are all those free speech activists and democracy champions when you need them? Too busy flattening Gaza maybe?
__________________
When your world has been hijacked by parasitic pathogens,
immune response becomes 'hate' and immunodeficiency 'progress' |
February 3rd, 2024 | #38 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Vincent Reynouard arrives in Paris and is released under heavy guard!
Editorial staff Participatory Democracy February 03, 2024 Démocratie Participative Vincent had recently addressed his supporters via his official website. He has left Britain, a sinister country with no future, ruled with an iron fist by the Jews. He's already in France! Le Monde : Quote:
Quote:
There are several options. Quote:
Quote:
For the Jews, jubilation will give way to despondency. This is all the more true in the new, resolutely anti-Semitic world climate. http://frontnationalsuisse.hautetfor.../02/index.html |
||||
February 3rd, 2024 | #39 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 296
|
the ironic thing is, the best place to learn the history of the Jews in France, is from the Jews, there's tons of videos about the history of the Jews in france. And they don't go much out of the way to cover it up.
This is a really good history of the jews in france. He talks about the struggle of Jews to have their own court system in France, recognized by the gentile government of France. This was the beginning of the end. They leveraged this to absolute maximum advantage, especially in business. The creation of the ridiculous Office central de lutte contre les crimes contre l'humanité is just a perpetuation of this principle, centuries later, they have government authority as a result of those French liberals letting them have their own courts, police systems. These are the specific Jews doing this. Quote:
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|