Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > This Just In
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old January 15th, 2023 #21
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Holocaust News: News about French Revisionist Vincent Reynouard from His Scottish Prison Cell

January 10, 5:15 p.m.: Three men in uniforms burst into the cell. Gosho (prison cell gook mate) who is having a nap has to get up. I am led outside. Three women and a man stand outside the door. Seven people? Hell, this is serious. “Search the cell,” I am told. Gosho comes out, we bring in. The, I undergo a body search: my clothes that I had to remove completely, are inspected. Once dressed, Gosho and I sat facing the cell door to assist in the search.

I see nothing, but the noises tell me that everything is inspected after being turned over, emptied, turned upside down. The boxes filled with our belongings are taken out and their contents carefully checked. I bend down to look in the cell: our beds are turned upside down, the homemade hooks to hang our jackets ripped off and thrown in the trash. Our shelves made with a hundred packs of cigarettes are emptied and taken out for checks. Fragile, they break and end up in the garbage: all the storage in the office is compromised. Deemed useless, empty boxes that we kept for later storage are thrown out. Suddenly, a roll of toilet paper comes through the door rolling gently on the floor, as if coming out of its own accord to escape the storm. I burst out laughing.

Two cell phones seized

The search lasts more than an hour. It allows two cell phones to be seized: Gosho's, whose seal preventing the SIM card from being replaced has disappeared, and another, found I don't know where, carrying a SIM card from outside. I was unaware of his presence in the cell. No doubt it was among the belongings left by a former prisoner. Anyway, the two devices are placed in two numbered plastic bags. Mine, on the other hand, is left to me, because it is in order. However, the team seized two sketches of the prison discovered among my drawings: they too are slipped into a bag.

Reintroduced into the cell after the team's departure, Gosho and I remain dumbfounded: it looks like a tornado has passed. Clothes, pencils, shoes, towels, drawing paper, dishes… everything is piled up on our beds in the greatest disorder. On the desk, the belongings previously stored in the broken shelves lie mixed up. In this small cell, it will take us three and a half hours to sort, put away and reorganize everything as well as possible.

Why this excavation?

The team told me it was a routine search of a random cell. I doubt it, and other inmates as well.

In my opinion, "one" suspects me of using an illegal telephone, in order to grant interviews to Rivarol: the one who presented my new work on Oradour undoubtedly offended the guardians of Memory. Unable to silence me, they try to harm me by all means.

The interview appeared at the start of the Christmas holidays, the search took place a week after the start of the school year: I find it difficult to see it as a coincidence. The French authorities know that the illegal use of a telephone in prison is severely punished: here, prisoners informed me that such an offense could be punished by six months in prison, not counting the additional sanctions and all the inconveniences possible for the convicted prisoner.

Punished like children

For now, Gosho and I are punished like children caught in the jam jar: we are deprived of morning outings for seven days. From 9 a.m. to 10 a.m., our cell remains closed. However, I believe that the illegal SIM card discovered in the third phone will be analyzed, in order to determine the calls made with this device. If the user can be identified, they will receive a much heavier punishment.

However, here again, the French authorities will fail, because I have never touched this phone or any other that would be equipped with an illegal SIM card. So they will try by all means to have me extradited.

Information on the “context of the video”

On January 12, I appeared before the court responsible for deciding on my extradition. The public prosecutor (which supports France's request) has requested a postponement of the hearing on the grounds that it is waiting for information from the French courts on the "context of the video" which earned me the 2015 conviction for which my extradition is demanded.

Why this request? No doubt because, obviously and contrary to the allegations of the French authorities, this video does not call for racial hatred or violence. As a reminder, this video denounced the ideological recruitment of youth using lies rehashed since 1945. Knowing therefore that I was condemned for revisionism (and not for incitement to racial hatred), the public prosecutor seems to want to prove that I acted out of anti-Semitism. This is what he calls the “context of the video”.

I trust in Providence

Will the maneuver succeed? My solicitor thinks not, because in Scottish law it is the tort itself that counts, not the motives, whatever they may be. I was convicted of “Holocaust denial”, regardless of my real or supposed motives. Revisionism being legal in Scotland, my extradition should therefore be refused. Will it be? We will find out on February 9, when the hearing was postponed.

Initially, the postponement was set for February 23. What does this eagerness mean? In my eyes, it is without interest: as usual, I trust in Providence. In prison or in freedom, I have plans full in the head. I leave the rest in God's hands.

Source (in french): https://blogue.sansconcession.org/20...-du-12-janvier
 
Old February 8th, 2023 #22
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

News from V. Reynouard and the revisionist struggle

On February 18, that is to say in 10 days, Vincent Reynouard will celebrate his 54th birthday in Edinburgh prison.

Let's all take the time to send him a little birthday card, to show him our support and our gratitude.

Mr. Reynouard will answer each one personally, and will accompany his answer with a drawing.

If you would like a response, please write your mailing address on the inside of the card.

As a reminder, the postal address of Mr. Reynouard is as follows:

160071 V Reynouard
Glenesk 3/11
HM Prison Edinburgh
33 Stenhouse Road
EDINBURGH
EH11 3LN
United Kingdom (UK)
 
Old February 10th, 2023 #23
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Quote:
Vincent Reynouard set for further hearing in extradition proceedings

9th February 2023

Reynouard was not in attendance at the court via video link from HMP Edinburgh on Thursday after an issue with the video link, but lawyer Paul Dunne said he had his client’s full position.

The court was told a YouTube video which was said to have been uploaded had recently been sent to Mr Dunne, but the video was currently in French with no translation yet available.

Reynouard’s solicitor said they needed to establish if the video fell into the category of racism or xenophobia.

Advocate Depute Paul Harvey said if it did, the issue of dual criminality – the principal that the offence convicted of and required to serve a sentence for in France is also an offence under domestic law – would fall away.

Mr Dunne also spoke of press reports in France which suggested there were further charges awaiting Reynouard’s arrival to his homeland, and he wanted clarification.

Sheriff Noble held Reynouard on remand.

Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990, and Reynouard has been convicted on numerous occasions.
https://www.harrowtimes.co.uk/news/n...n-proceedings/



From the Blog Sans Concession

Quote:
The defense adopted by Mr. Reynouard's lawyer
Quote:

When a State issues a European arrest warrant, in order to obtain the extradition of a person found guilty of an offense or a crime, his request will be accepted if the facts also constitute an offense or a crime in the country where the litigant resides. If therefore the person opposes his extradition, the justice of the host country must examine the file, except in the case of 23 offenses and crimes which appear on a list provided for by international agreements on extradition. Among these 23 offenses and crimes are, for example, rape, arson, as well as “racism”.

The purpose of this list is simple: a) the offenses and crimes it brings together are punishable in all European countries; b) the definition of the said offenses and crimes does not pose any problem. Whether in England, Italy or Poland, arson is arson. So, for these 23 crimes and misdemeanors on the list, extradition is automatic, even if the litigant opposes it.

In the case of Mr. Reynouard, the French authorities based their request for extradition by accusing the revisionist of one of the 23 crimes and misdemeanors on the list: that of “racism/xenophobia”. Why did they act this way? Because the facts for which Mr. Reynouard was convicted in France, namely “Holocaust denial”, do not constitute an offense in the United Kingdom, which legally prevents his extradition. Aware of this impediment, the French authorities tried to circumvent the law by ticking the “racism/xenophobia” box in their extradition request.

Two years ago, Mr. Reynouard's lawyer could not have done anything: the box being checked, Scottish justice would have ruled out any discussion. However, two years ago Scotland recognized that in extradition proceedings a state can be guilty of abusive process.

The lawyer therefore intends to raise the following argument: the video for which Mr. Reynouard was convicted and which is described in the arrest warrant corresponds to “negationism”, and not to “racism”. To make sure, he plans to ask French justice for details on the conviction of Mr. Reynouard.

When the lawyer discussed all this with the prosecutor, in order to explain to him why he was about to ask for an extension, the prosecutor replied that he intended to make the same request. The lawyer was pleasantly surprised, because it seems to indicate that the prosecutor (who is not on Mr. Reynouard's side) also believes that there is a problem...

France seems to be abusively claiming one of its nationals whom it does not like for its opinions; she wants him at all costs, to lock him up after having sued him politically. And to achieve her ends, she seems ready to do anything, even to deceive the Scottish Justice.

It must be understood that the case of Mr. Reynouard is unheard of in Scotland. If we go back to political trials, as France does, then there is no more justice and we can go back to slavery. This is why the lawyer decided to defend Mr. Reynouard mordicus.

On February 9, the lawyer will ask for a delay. Knowing that the prosecutor has already carried out the same process of requesting information from France, the lawyer's request will be accepted. Mr. Reynouard's case will be tried in May or June 2023, because it is very important. This is unheard of in Scotland, where freedom of expression exists whether you agree or disagree with what is being said.
Source (in french): https://blogue.sansconcession.org/20...itif-et-joyeux

Last edited by alex revision; February 10th, 2023 at 04:47 AM.
 
Old March 10th, 2023 #24
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Quote:
French Holocaust denier caught in Scotland handed second arrest warrant


Vincent Reynouard, 54, was handed the warrant as he sat in the dock at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday.

9 MAR 2023

A prolific Holocaust denier who is wanted by authorities in France has been handed a second warrant for his arrest in court.

Vincent Reynouard, 54, was handed the warrant as he sat in the dock at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday, where he appeared for the latest stage in his extradition battle. The Frenchman was convicted under anti-Nazi laws across the Channel and handed a four-month jail term in November 2020, and a further six months in January 2021.

After Reynouard was served the fresh warrant in French and English, his lawyer Paul Dunne told him: “Take your time and read it so you understand the nature of the offences against you.”

Mr Dunne told Sheriff Kenneth Campbell it was “far from ideal” for his client to have been served a copy in the dock, but that Reynouard had “understood the charges”. Mr Dunne said: “He does not consent to his extradition to France.”

Advocate depute Paul Harvey KC told the hearing French authorities had made an error in their application for the first warrant, and Mr Dunne said it therefore resulted in a change of focus for their argument against that extradition request.

The court has previously been told of a YouTube video which had been uploaded, which has two French speakers talking over it. But on Thursday, the court was told this has yet to be translated by French authorities.

Sheriff Campbell told Reynouard: “You have now been served with this fresh warrant and you understand the general nature of the charges.”

During the 23-minute hearing, there was no application for bail and Reynouard has been held on remand. A preliminary hearing has been fixed for April 20, with his full extradition hearing scheduled for June 8.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/s...tland-29415762
 
Old April 21st, 2023 #25
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Vincent Reynouard: Holocaust denier’s extradition hearing delayed


20th April 2023

A preliminary extradition hearing for a Holocaust denier wanted by authorities in France has been delayed for a further four weeks.

Edinburgh Sheriff Court heard the delay will allow videos Vincent Reynouard is alleged to have made to be translated into English, as well as work out what offences, if any, he has committed under Scots law.

Reynouard, 54, was convicted under anti-Nazi laws across the Channel. He was handed a four-month jail term in November 2020 and a further six months in January 2021.

He appeared before Sheriff Frank Crowe on Thursday by video-link from HMP Edinburgh.

He does not consent to his extradition back to France.

His lawyer Paul Dunne asked the court if the preliminary hearing in his extradition case could be moved to May 18 as one of two YouTube videos Reynouard is alleged to have made has not yet been translated from French into English.

One of the transcripts was made available on Thursday morning, prior to the hearing.

Mr Dunne also said Holocaust denial is not an offence in Scotland.

He told the court: “We cannot definitively say whether we are dealing with Scottish offending here.”

Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990, and Reynouard has been convicted on numerous occasions.

Reynouard fled to Scotland following his latest conviction for a series of antisemitic Facebook posts.

A further preliminary hearing has been set in Edinburgh for May 18 before a full extradition hearing on June 8.

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...aring-delayed/

Last edited by alex revision; April 22nd, 2023 at 03:10 AM.
 
Old April 22nd, 2023 #26
Paul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alex revision
Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990, and Reynouard has been convicted on numerous occasions.
That is some crazy shit.
 
Old June 8th, 2023 #27
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Holocaust denier Vincent Reynouard has extradition hearing delayed

8th June, 2023

AN extradition hearing for a Holocaust denier wanted by French police and found hiding in Scotland has been postponed again.

Vincent Reynouard was arrested in Anstruther, Fife, in November last year then remanded in custody after crossing the Channel in a bid to evade the French authorities, who have been pursuing him for two years.

The 54-year-old went on the run after he was convicted under anti-Nazi laws and handed a four-month jail sentence in November 2020, then a further six-month spell in January the following year.

Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990 and Reynouard has been convicted numerous times.

A full extradition hearing was supposed to get under way at Edinburgh Sheriff Court earlier this year but lawyer Paul Dunne pushed for this to be postponed to allow videos Reynouard is alleged to have made to be translated into English.

When the case called again at the court on Thursday, Dunne requested a further postponement, insisting certain “legal issues” understood to relate to the two arrest warrants issued by the French authorities had to be debated first.

He said another advocate specialising in extradition, Fred Mackintosh KC, is unable to come to court until the start of July at the earliest, and he asked for the full extradition hearing to be pushed back to later that month.

Sheriff Kenneth Campbell agreed to reschedule the full hearing for July 27, and he set a further preliminary hearing for July 13.

He also called for written submissions pertaining to the case to be handed in a week beforehand.

https://www.thenational.scot/news/23...aring-delayed/
 
Old July 13th, 2023 #28
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Holocaust denier facing extradition to France has hearing moved to October

July 13, 2023

The extradition hearing of a Holocaust denier wanted by authorities in France has been pushed back until later this year.

Vincent Reynouard’s lawyer told Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday he no longer wished to proceed with a legal debate he had been due to go through concerning the Frenchman’s case and moved to set a date for a full hearing.

Reynouard was arrested in Fife then remanded in custody last year after crossing the Channel to evade French authorities who had been pursuing him for two years.

The 54-year-old went on the run after he was convicted under anti-Nazi laws and handed a four-month jail sentence in November 2020, then a further six-month spell in January the following year.

Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990 and Reynouard has been convicted on multiple occasions.

Appearing before Sheriff Frank Crowe, Reynouard’s lawyer Paul Dunne said the contents of a note passed to the court by another lawyer acting on Reynouard’s behalf did not need to be debated any more and moved to have the note withdrawn.

He went on to call for a full hearing date to be fixed and this was set for October 19 with a further preliminary hearing also scheduled for September 21.

Mr Dunne also requested the court to clarify how long Reynouard was supposed to spend in prison to complete his sentence before the hearing, pointing out he has been in custody since he was first held by police in November last year.

https://www.inverness-courier.co.uk/...october-83409/
 
Old September 22nd, 2023 #29
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

French Holocaust denier hiding in Scotland made 'appalling' YouTube videos, court hears

Vincent Reynouard appeared at Edinburgh Sheriff Court to face extradition to France over the hateful views he spouted online.

21 SEP 2023

A sheriff has been urged to order the extradition of a French Holocaust denier who was hiding out in Scotland.

Vincent Reynouard made a string of YouTube videos where he denied the Holocaust and spouted anti-Semitic hatred.

The 54-year-old is wanted in France under anti-Nazi laws and authorities in his homeland sought his extradition.

A full extradition hearing was held at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday with Reynouard appearing in the dock from custody.

Reynouard was detained in the Anstruther area of Fife last November on an arrest warrant.

Advocate depute Paul Harvey told the hearing that Reynouard’s videos displayed the “most appalling anti-Semitism”.

Mr Harvey said the words spoken in each of eight videos would constitute a breach of the peace under Scottish law.

Reynouard would need to have committed a crime which is also an offence under Scots law to meet the test for extradition.

But Fred Mackintosh KC, defending Reynouard, said Reynouard’s videos didn’t constitute a breach of the peace as there was no call for action by others.

Sheriff Chris Dickson set a further hearing for October 20 when he hoped to deliver his verdict in the extradition battle.

The court heard Reynouard produced vile videos on subjects such as “the Jewish problem” and denied both the Holocaust and that there were gas chambers at the Auschwitz concentration camp.

Mr Harvey said there was no need under Scottish law for a breach of the peace to require a direct call to action.

The prosecutor said putting the videos on YouTube created a “greater risk of serious disturbance” as they were “more widely and permanently available” on the internet.

Mr Harvey added the videos violated the Communications Act as they were “grossly offensive” and met the test for that offence as well.

In his submission, Mr MacIntosh said Reynouard’s videos didn’t constitute a breach of the peace as “he does not call for any action”.

Mr MacIntosh said “Holocaust denial per se” was not a crime in the UK, and the videos contained “no encouragement of other people to act”.

He added it was a “sad reality” that denying the Holocaust was a “feature of our society”.

Mr MacIntosh said Reynouard’s actions would be “unlikely” to attract a prison sentence in Scotland so it would be “disproportionate to extradite him”.

The Frenchman was convicted under anti-Nazi laws across the Channel and handed a four-month jail term in November 2020, and a further six months in January 2021.

Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990, and Reynouard has been convicted on numerous occasions.

The French were seeking Reynouard on two warrants. The extradition hearing was told the first warrant was being discharged as the French considered Reynouard to have served his sentence for it inside a Scottish prison.

The French press has claimed Reynouard had been working as a private tutor while living under a false identity while in the UK.

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/s...tland-30997726
 
Old October 12th, 2023 #30
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Quote:
Holocaust denier can be extradited to France, court rules


Oct 12, 2023

Vincent Reynouard was arrested in Fife in November 2022.

A Holocaust denier arrested in Scotland can be extradited to France where he is wanted by authorities, a court has ruled.

Authorities in France issued a domestic warrant for Vincent Reynouard over alleged offences relating to online videos some of which contain statements denying that the Holocaust happened.

The alleged offences include “public trivialisation of a war crime” and “public challenge to the existence of crimes against humanity committed during the Second World War”.

Reynouard, 54, was arrested in Fife in November last year and was remanded in custody after crossing the Channel to evade French authorities who had been pursuing him for two years.

Sheriff Christopher Dickson said that statements in the videos are “beyond the pale of what is tolerable in our society” and “grossly offensive”.

He ruled that the alleged offences constitute an offence under Scots law as they would amount to a breach of the Communications Act, and that there was therefore no bar to extradition.

In a written ruling he said: “I have found that the conduct set out in the accusation warrant constitutes an extradition offence; there are no bars to extradition; the respondent’s extradition would be compatible with the convention rights within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998; and the respondent’s extradition would not be disproportionate.

“In such circumstances I order the respondent to be extradited to France.”

Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in France since 1990 and Reynouard has been convicted on previous occasions, including being handed a four-month jail term in November 2020 and a further six months in January 2021.

Sheriff Dickson said that Reynouard was arrested in November 2022 on a conviction warrant concerning a 12-month jail sentence which was upheld in the Court of Appeal in Caen, Normandy, on June 17 2015.

The single offence he had been convicted of was disputing the existence of a crime against humanity and involved him publishing two videos online which, amongst other things, disputed the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz and described the Holocaust as a myth, the sheriff said.

However, at a previous hearing the court heard that the conviction warrant had been withdrawn by French authorities due to the amount of time Reynouard had spent on remand in Scotland.

This left the domestic warrant which was issued by French authorities in November 2022, in relation to which Reynouard now faces extradition.

Sheriff Dickson’s ruling was published following a hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday and Reynouard was remanded in custody.
https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/...e-court-rules/


Quote:
French holocaust denier Vincent Reynouard faces extradition from Scotland


Vincent Reynouard, 54, was arrested in Fife last year after going on the run.

Thursday 12 October 2023 15:26, UK

A convicted Holocaust denier who spent two years on the run is to be extradited back to France, a Scottish court has ruled.

Vincent Reynouard, 54, was arrested in November last year after being tracked down in Fife.

During a hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday, Reynouard was told he will be returned to his homeland to stand trial on charges including "public trivialisation of a war crime" and "public incitement to hatred".

The Frenchman's lawyers had argued that UK extradition law only allows people to be sent back to their homeland if there is an equivalent British crime to the one that foreign states plan to prosecute them for.

Defence advocate Fred Mackintosh KC stated there was no equivalent law in Scotland to Holocaust denial and that this should stop his client from being extradited.

However, Sheriff Chris Dickson ruled against the defence.

In a written judgment explaining his decision, Sheriff Dickson wrote about how Reynouard published a video online.

Sheriff Dickson concluded that although Reynouard "did not call for the extermination of the Jewish people", his actions in the video would constitute an offence under Scottish law and due to that he could be extradited.

Reynouard was apprehended in Anstruther on 10 November 2022 on a Trade and Cooperation Agreement warrant.

He is wanted in France as the authorities there believe he is guilty of denying the Holocaust took place. The act of Holocaust denial is an offence in France.

Reports say Reynouard was using a false identity while working as a private tutor after evading authorities for two years before being arrested.

The search was led by France's Central Office for the Fight against Crimes against Humanity and Hate Crimes.

The investigation began after the memorial of Oradour-sur-Glane, where Nazi troops killed and destroyed an entire village in June 1944, was vandalised by graffiti which read "Reynouard is right".

Reynouard was first convicted of Holocaust denial in 1991.

He was detained after handing out leaflets denying the existence of gas chambers among high school pupils.

In 1997, he was sacked from his job as a maths teacher at a secondary school in Honfleur, Normandy. His dismissal came after the discovery of revisionist texts on his computer hard disk.

He was also found giving his students statistical equations regarding the rate of mortality in Nazi concentration camps.

In 2005, Reynouard was sentenced to a year's imprisonment and fined €10,000 (£8,600) by a court for writing a 16-page brochure entitled "Holocaust? Here's what's kept hidden from you".

This was sent to French tourism offices, museums and town halls.

In 2015, he was sentenced to two years in jail by a court in Normandy for denying the Holocaust in a series of Facebook posts.

His most recent conviction came in November 2020 for posting a Holocaust denial video on YouTube.
https://news.sky.com/story/french-ho...tland-12983203
 
Old November 13th, 2023 #31
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Quote:
Vincent Reynouard’s Open Letter to President Macron


November 13, 2023

[This letter was written from Edinburgh Prison in May 2023 and published in French at Vincent’s blog. It is also now available in German translation. Vincent Reynouard remains in Edinburgh Prison pending his appeal against extradition, scheduled to be heard in January 2024.]

Mr President,

I am writing to you from Edinburgh prison, in Great Britain, where I have been detained since November 10th 2022. On June 8, 2023, the Scottish courts will rule on my extradition which France is requesting in order to have me serve a prison sentence to which I was sentenced in June 2015. [Eventually this ruling was delayed until October 2023 and it is now subject to appeal.]

What crime have I committed that I am still being hunted after more than seven years? Did I rob a bank, massively evade taxes, rape or kill? No, I broadcast a revisionist video on YouTube – you would say: “negationist” – in which I denounced the political indoctrination of youth in the name of the “duty to remember”. I specifically exposed the untruths they are taught about Auschwitz. For this presentation of less than an hour, the French courts sentenced me to one year in prison. I then fled to England.

As revisionism is not an offence in the United Kingdom, in order to obtain my extradition, the French authorities did not hesitate to lie: they issued a European arrest warrant claiming that I had been convicted of “racism/xenophobia”, an offence which makes extradition automatic. Scottish justice sensing the manoeuvre, Paris had to issue a second arrest warrant, based on three charges filed against me, including one for “public incitement to hatred”.

In a video released in 2020, I allegedly preached anti-Judaism. To claim this, the judicial authorities extracted 31 seconds from a 45-minute presentation! I responded to a viewer who said that the extermination of the Jews would be a “necessary evil”. After emphasising that a “necessary evil” was a moral contradiction, I explained why exterminating the Jews would serve no purpose, as they only reflect disfunctions from which our societies suffer and for which we are primarily responsible. The 31 seconds extracted summarise this opinion: they cannot constitute a call to hatred of Jews.

Watching the entire video confirms this. I also note that in thirty years of activism, I had never been prosecuted under the so-called “anti-racist” law. For a very simple reason: I am not “racist” in the sense given to this word today (a “racist” would advocate racial hatred). Furthermore, I declare myself Jewish-indifferent. In other words: I have neither sympathy nor antipathy for this race composed – like all races – of very different people.

These abusive prosecutions for “public incitement to hatred” are a new manoeuvre attempted by the French authorities which are working hard to obtain my extradition. The end goal is to throw me in prison and keep me there as long as possible in order to silence me.

What an admission, Mr. President! I could not hope, from your authorities, for a more resounding recognition of the value and importance of my work. Indeed, let’s compare the forces involved:
  • on the one hand, France has multiple memorial museums: the Shoah Memorial in Paris, the Deportation Museum in Lyon, the Caen Memorial, the Oradour Memory Center in Oradour-sur-Glane, without counting the dozens of “memory books” throughout the country, to which are added school programmes (the Shoah in primary, middle and high school), “educational trips” to Struthof, Oradour or Auschwitz, the “transmitters of memory”, the films, the broadcasts, the books, the witnesses in schools, because the “duty of memory” benefits from thousands of contributors – all in conformity with the official history – and from funding which reached millions of euros.

    in front of this, a man almost alone, who has no subsidies, only donations from his limited audience (two or three thousand people at most); who, for a living, gives private lessons; he distributes his work on his own account and sells his works sparsely, because no publisher agrees to publish his research; who, kicked out of all the major sharing platforms, publishes his videos in the catacombs of the Internet — namely, a Gab channel and a blog in the United States of America.

These are the elements present, which we could depict as follows: facing an immense choir singing at the top of their lungs accompanied by a deafening orchestra, a lone man, equipped with a paltry paper cone as a makeshift megaphone. However, for the French authorities, this is still too much: this lone man must be silenced by seizing him at all costs and throwing him in prison! A first arrest warrant was not enough, so they issued a second one after filing three additional complaints. Yes, really, I could not hope for more dazzling recognition of the value and importance of my work.

You will undoubtedly allege, Mr. President, that the repression against me has a completely different cause: my theses, you will say, offend the victims and can lead certain fragile elements of the population to perpetrate “racist” acts. I would answer that this is false, for two reasons.
  • I have never denied the terrible tragedy experienced by the people present in Oradour-sur-Glane on Saturday June 10, 1944. I have never denied the drama that was the hasty deportation, in the middle of the war, of millions of people, including women, children, the elderly, the weak and the disabled. Although the excavations carried out over the past twenty-five years in the Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec and Chelmno camps have not led to the discovery of gas chambers, they have, however, contributed to the discovery of numerous improvised mass graves. I have never disputed the existence of these pits. They contain the bodies of tens of thousands of Jews who died on the trains or euthanised upon arrival, because they were injured, sick or too weakened to go further east. Numerous stories corroborate these material findings. In several videos, I have cited them, without contesting or rejecting them. Added to this are the living conditions in the overcrowded and sometimes poorly supplied ghettos in Poland or in the East: they caused numerous victims that I have also mentioned. Finally come all the deportees who died in the last months of the war when, in a Germany devastated by bombings, the situation inside the camps deteriorated (overpopulation, lack of medicine, insufficient supplies). The terrible photos taken at the liberation of Buchenwald, Dachau, Vaihingen or Bergen-Belsen, I have shown them on multiple occasions, without ever calling them montages. No one, therefore, can honestly claim that I would offend the memory of the victims by denying their death or the terrible circumstances of their death.

    as for leading certain people to commit “racist” acts, my answer will be simple: in the thirty years that I have been disseminating my work, no aggressive act has been denounced, for which I have have been shown to be the inspiration.

However, let’s go further. Yes, let’s admit that my presentations could lead a handful of fragile people to perpetrate “racist” violence. Should we therefore deprive the entire population of certain historical truths by sanctioning their public dissemination? Certainly not!

However, I can already hear your reply, Mr. President: “A country of freedom of research, France will never prohibit the dissemination of scientifically established truths. With the denialists, however, it is not a question of truths, but of lies refuted by reliable witnesses and a cohort of accredited historians. You are very presumptuous, Mr. Reynouard, to claim to be correct and that these people are wrong.”

In reality, I am no more proud than an investigator convinced of having solved a case despite the denials of the accused and their lawyers. For what? Because from Oradour to Auschwitz, I adopted the traditional methods used in criminal investigations.
  • I went to the site to examine the scene of the alleged crime;

    I carried out material observations in order to understand what could have happened;

    I verified the stories collected (testimonies and confessions) by confronting them with material findings and analyzing their internal consistency;

    I supplemented my research with the study of useful documents. In summary, I have established the materiality of the facts.

Am I wrong in my conclusions? Let us debate it fairly, with each party being able to freely express themselves and place their documents on the table. I am ready for this confrontation on equal terms. I even ask for it.

You will object to me that one cannot debate History with a person devoid of any training as a historian. Should I conclude from this, Mr. President, that a non-historian cannot intervene in a question of History? Thirty years ago, however, in 1993, the CNRS published a work entitled: The Crematoria of Auschwitz. The machinery of mass murder.

The press praised its author, affirming that he definitively refuted revisionist theses. However its author, Jean-Claude Pressac, was… a pharmacist by profession. Even more revealing: the man considered until his death as the number one expert on the Holocaust, Raul Hilberg, was not a historian by training either. I could also cite Robert Jan Von Pelt, Jean-Jacques Fouché or Guy Pauchou (for Oradour). Proof that non-historians can intervene in questions of History.

Some of my opponents — Gilles Karmasyn for example — claim to refute me, but without ever accepting the debate. They are comparable to boxers who, alone in the ring, would throw punches into the air before raising their arms and shouting: “I won! He is knocked out.” To anyone who is surprised at the absence of the adversary, they respond: “Let’s see! You don’t box with a non-boxer.” Pretending that we do not debate history with a non-historian is a pitiful evasion.

Of course, I have no training in this matter, but in Auschwitz and Oradour, the SS are accused of having massacred innocent people. These are therefore criminal matters. The fact that the alleged murders were allegedly committed in the past does not change the nature of the question, and therefore does not change the methods of investigation. Now, I repeat, I apply these methods scrupulously.

Do you want proof? Here it is: in Birkenau, the SS allegedly set up homicidal gas chambers in four large crematoria. The deadliest — 400,000 alleged victims — were found in Krema II. The SS are said to have poured Zykon B through four square holes in the roof. The deadly pellets would supposedly have fallen along four mesh columns firmly attached to the floor and ceiling. Although the crematory was dynamited, the partially collapsed roof remains. Having inspected it from above and below, I saw no trace of any introductory orifice or of a mesh column attachment. Nothing.

Certainly, in 2004, three independent researchers (Messrs. Keren, McCarthy and Mazal) claimed to have located three of the four holes; but the Auschwitz Museum authorities never dared to invoke their study. Seven years later, moreover, the director of the Museum prefaced a Historical Guide to Auschwitz in which the two authors warned that it was vain to search for the exact location of these ghostly orifices. Since then, nothing has changed.

In the event of a debate with a historian, I would first bring the discussion to this subject. I would suggest that we go to the site together, looking for the alleged holes as well as traces of the mesh columns. I would take advantage of our presence on the site to ask my opponent if he can show me blue marks on the wall or on the ceiling of the “gas chamber”.

In the spring of 1943, in fact (date of the start of mass gassings in the crematoria according to the official chronology), the structure had just been built. Consequently, the masonry was alkaline. The hydrocyanic acid allegedly used by the SS for mass gassing would have partially penetrated into the damp materials (bricks, plaster, concrete). It would have broken down there to form a pigment based on ferrocyanides: Prussian Blue.

Very stable, resistant to light rays and bad weather, the walls and ceiling of the room presented as having served as a gas chamber should still contain them today. We should therefore see more or less large blue traces. However, the historian would be unable to show me a single one. Would he claim that this pigment cannot form in an unheated room? I would show him otherwise. On the original plans of the crematory, this room is designated as a morgue. Everything shows that it was used for this purpose, without ever having been converted into a homicidal gas chamber.

“No Holes, No Holocaust”, Professor Faurisson had repeated since 1994. He was right, because without these holes, the 400,000 alleged victims of this gas chamber are imaginary. All the testimonies and confessions will not change anything.

Anti-revisionists ask us: “if the millions of Jews were not exterminated, then where were they in 1945?” Sorry, but that reverses the burden of proof. It is up to the anti-revisionists to demonstrate that the Jews were systematically exterminated, among whom three million died in gas chambers.

According to official history, Auschwitz-Birkenau was the centre of this extermination by gas (nearly a million victims). The Krema II gas chamber would have been the deadliest (40% of those asphyxiated). It is therefore that which must be examined first. Where are the Zyklon B introduction ports? Historians, show them to us, so we can discuss them. And where are the blue marks? It is true that a background in chemistry is necessary to understand the importance of their absence. Holder of a degree in organic chemistry, I am therefore better placed than a historian to conclude.

The same is true in Oradour. The Waffen SS are accused of having massacred several hundred women and children in the village church. They allegedly tried to suffocate them before machine-gunning them, then setting fire to the building. The widespread fire would have transformed the holy place into a crematorium, and many bodies would have been reduced to ashes. In this matter, notions of heat diffusion, radiation and resistance of materials prove necessary.

My studies having led me to study these subjects, I put my knowledge to good use to assess the church. This expertise is the subject of an entire chapter of my book published in December 2022: Oradour, the cry of the victims. I conclude that the official story is false: the women and children died in explosions that shook the entire building. How did I come to this conclusion? As follows:
  • The preservation of the wooden furniture (the confessional in the Chapel of the Virgin and the altar of the Chapel of Saint-Joseph) denies the thesis of a widespread fire;

    The partial melting of the bells (parts completely melted, others intact to the point of still showing the patterns engraved there) demonstrates that the destructive event was very rapid and very brief, in a word, an explosion;

    Observation of the blows to the thin brass sphere under the ridge cross confirms that the destructive phenomenon was accompanied by a powerful blast.

Added to this is the condition of the bodies found in the church or nearby: they are not charred, but shredded, with their clothes intact, as after a bombing.

Finally come the stories told by the woman presented as the only survivor of the church, Marguerite Rouffanche. A few weeks after the tragedy, twice in November 1944, then once in January 1953 (at the Waffen SS trial) and once again in 1969 (for television), she testified. The comparative study of the different versions reveals insurmountable contradictions and obvious material impossibilities.
  • At the end of June 1944, Madame Rouffanche affirmed that the massacre of the church had started with a “box” brought by two Waffen SS. The device did not explode, it only released thick black smoke.

    A few months later, however, the vaults of the nave of the church collapsed, indicating that the building had been severely shaken. To explain it, it was necessary to invoke an explosion: on November 16, 1944, Madame Rouffanche therefore made a 180-degree turn and claimed that the “box” had been the site of a “small detonation”.

    However, this was insufficient to explain the shaking of this fortified building. Two weeks later, “the sole survivor” changed her version again: she alleged that the device had exploded strongly. This testimony became the official account, published everywhere, while that of November 16 would remain hidden from view, in military archives closed to the public.

To the contradictions are added manifest impossibilities. In particular, Madame Rouffanche’s flight from the church, by climbing up to a stained glass window then jumping four meters high onto a steeply inclined plane without causing the slightest injury, an impossible feat for a woman of 46 years.

In the Oradour affair, everything betrays the clumsily improvised lie. Based on material findings, documents and ignored testimonies, I affirm that a clandestine ammunition depot was located under the attic of the church, above the vaults.

Under what circumstances was it set on fire? As long as military archives are closed to independent researchers, no certain answer can be put forward. However, assuming that, having discovered it, the Waffen SS blew it up to kill the women and children, in 1944, the fact would have been revealed: Oradour-sur-Glane would have been presented as a heroic village in its resistance to the Occupier, victim of abominable revenge by the “Nazis”. This is why I remain convinced that the Waffen SS bear no direct responsibility for the outbreak of the church tragedy.

Having discovered that the building was used by the local Resistance (which hid allied pilots who fell in France and were supported by the “Comet Escape Line” escape network), my thesis is as follows.

On June 10, 1944, resistance fighters took refuge in the church, with their ammunition. Indeed, the Waffen SS having surrounded the village, it was impossible to flee. Denounced by two collaborators living in the town (see the testimony of Mathieu Borie finally published in its entirety), they blew up the ammunition depot in order to cover their escape through a side door which opened onto the exit from the town. They had not anticipated that the explosions would propagate to the bell tower, causing the destruction of the vault weakened by the presence of the oculus. The superheated gases spread throughout the nave, carrying debris which mutilated those present.

At Oradour, as at Auschwitz, my material findings are undeniable, my analyses are meticulous, and my arguments are rational. Far from any ideological consideration, I remain on the ground of facts. Hence this desire and this determination to silence me, the other reasons given being vague pretexts.

Will France succeed in having me extradited? Perhaps, but it is too late: I distributed my work on the Internet and I was barely able – before my arrest on November 10, 2022 – to finish my work on Oradour. It has been on sale since last January.

About thirty years ago, as a very young revisionist, I was invited to the Faurisson house. One morning, I was chatting in the work room; I emphasized that our adversaries had financial and repressive means. Professor Faurisson was washing in the adjoining bathroom. At these words, he half-opened the door and, sticking his head in, said: “Yes, but we sleep peacefully.”

It was true then, it remains true today: in my cell in Edinburgh, I sleep peacefully, because having sowed seeds of historical truth, I have fulfilled my duty. From now on, my personal destiny no longer has any importance. The France that you represent can insist on having me extradited and imprisoned. When we take stock of the forces present, this determination appears as an admission: the admission that I am right and that my work is important. Yes, really, I sleep peacefully, and the more your henchmen try, the quieter I will sleep.

Please believe, Mr. President, in the expression of my chosen sentiments.

Vincent Reynouard
https://jailingopinions.com/realhist...sident-macron/
 
Old November 13th, 2023 #32
H.B.
Senior Member
 
H.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,749
Default

The genocidal monsters who call themselves kikes would not be so fanatical about persecuting reputable scholars to the end of the earth if they were confident their Holohoax bullshit would hold up to scrutiny.
__________________
Smash jewish supremacy. Smash globalism. Smash ZOG. Use ad blockers at all times to starve off the (((beast))).
 
Old January 15th, 2024 #33
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Real History in the dock: Vincent Reynouard’s appeal heard in Edinburgh


January 14, 2024

The appeal hearing in the case of Vincent Reynouard was heard in Edinburgh on Thursday, 11th January 2024 before a panel of judges of the High Court of Justiciary.

Regular readers will remember that Vincent was arrested fourteen months ago and has been held in Edinburgh jail ever since, despite not being charged (let alone convicted) of any crime against UK laws. The French authorities are seeking his extradition under their notorious ‘Gayssot Law’ which forbids any questioning of historical orthodoxy regarding the ‘Holocaust’ and certain other alleged events of the Second World War.

Here is a translation of Vincent’s report which first appeared in French at Vincent’s website – the report is also now available translated into German and Spanish.


My lawyer was more incisive that in the trial at first instance.

After recalling that the videos that are the target of French prosecutors mainly dealt with the Holocaust, he emphasised that I challenge official history with rational arguments, without polemicising.

Then he came to the fourth video, which deals with the Jewish question.

“Mr. Reynouard,” he said, “declares himself in agreement with Hitler on the existence of a Jewish problem. This statement may shock, even alarm. However, when he claims to go further than Hitler, it is not to incite murder, quite the contrary. My client explains that going further in his reflections, he deduces that the Jewish problem arises from the faults from which our societies suffer (loss of spirituality, hedonism, etc.).

“The sentence which states this was omitted from the arrest warrant on which the trial judge relied. However, it is crucial, because it explains that my client does not advocate the genocide of the Jews or the eradication of Judaism. At first instance, the judge also recognised that Mr Reynouard was not calling for the extermination of the Jews.

“I add that, unlike Alison Chabloz, my client is neither satirical nor sarcastic: his speech is calm and thoughtful.”

At this point, a judge intervenes to declare that the assertion that Hitler was right to denounce a Jewish problem was itself grossly offensive. My lawyer replied that the message should be judged not by extracting a few statements, but by considering its totality.

Then, he recalled that the United Kingdom had refused to criminalise revisionism.

“Mr. Reynouard,” he concluded, “is a revisionist. He is being prosecuted for this reason. Ordering his extradition by invoking Section 127 of the Communications Act — a section that was originally intended to crack down on obscene telephone calls — would be an abuse of that law.”

Speaking in his turn, the prosecutor said: “Mr. Reynouard not only denies the Holocaust; he also disputes the massacre of Oradour by the SS, which left 643 victims.” With this allegation, the prosecutor wanted to present me as a madman who denies the deaths of civilians, which I never did. The aim of this dishonest manoeuvre was to undermine the defence contention that I rely on rational arguments.

The prosecutor continued by asserting that the trial judge had correctly analysed the grossly offensive nature of my videos, but he did not dare to claim that by declaring that I went further than Hitler, I was manifesting “terrible anti-Semitism”, because that would have been really too ridiculous.

Then, he considered the question of whether I’d had committed a breach of public order law. We remember that at first instance, the judge dismissed this accusation. The prosecutor maintained that this was an error: “There is a risk that the videos targeted by French prosecutors could be viewed by a certain section of the public who, after listening to Mr Reynouard, will be incited to perpetrate anti-Semitic acts.” Here we recognise the main argument of the opponents of freedom of expression: “You can express yourself freely, provided that your words do not risk inciting hatred among certain people.”

My lawyer replied that in my videos, I did not call on anyone to act, but that I encouraged viewers to think by providing them with food for thought, which is unrelated to the sort of violent messages, such as racist insults, satirical-sarcastic songs, shouting and unambiguous gestures, which are ordinarily judged as undermining public order.

The judges will make their decision on February 1st. At the end of this hearing, I will not hazard any predictions, for one simple reason: everything will happen in the heads of these three judges whose state of mind I do not know.

In reaching their judgment, they will have the choice. If, out of respect for freedom of expression, they wish to release me, then they will accept the Defence arguments. Otherwise, they will favour those of the Prosecution. They will not have to answer for their decisions, at least in this life.

However, I remain calm, because whatever the outcome, I will serve the revisionist cause. Some say that I would be more useful in freedom than in prison. I think that’s not necessarily the case. Suffering repression also allows us to bear witness to the truth. Future generations will note: “He put forward rational arguments and offered fair debate; they pursued him as far as a remote corner of Scotland and gagged him.” The facts will lead to inescapable conclusions.

Shortly before boarding the prison bus, a guard whispered to me: “You are a hero. Yes, a hero.” I don’t think I’m one; I consider myself a man who fulfils his duty to his people. However, this mark of respect coming from a simple civil servant touched me. I see it as a sign from Providence which indicates to me that, in the shadows, my work is spreading and revisionism is progressing.

I will never give in.

Thanks again to everyone who supports me.

https://jailingopinions.com/realhist...-in-edinburgh/
 
Old January 16th, 2024 #34
U. Dunrouse
Senior Member
 
U. Dunrouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 4,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H.B. View Post
The genocidal monsters who call themselves kikes would not be so fanatical about persecuting reputable scholars to the end of the earth if they were confident their Holohoax bullshit would hold up to scrutiny.
They already know that it does not hold up to scrutiny...

__________________
When your world has been hijacked by parasitic pathogens,
immune response becomes 'hate' and immunodeficiency 'progress'
 
Old January 27th, 2024 #35
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Vincent Reynouard’s Edinburgh appeal rejected as French courts seek to jail revisionist scholar

January 26, 2024

This afternoon in Edinburgh the President of the Court of Session, Lord Carloway, rejected the appeal against extradition to France of Vincent Reynouard, the exiled scholar whom Parisian courts seek to jail for his research questioning orthodox history of the ‘Holocaust’ and the ‘massacre at Oradour’.

Regular readers of this blog will be familiar with the background to the case. Vincent was arrested in the Scottish fishing village of Anstruther in November 2023 and has been held in Edinburgh jail for the past fourteen months, despite not being charged (let alone convicted) of any crime under UK law.

France is one of many European countries which criminalise any historical and scientific research questioning the orthodox version of the ‘Holocaust’: the alleged murder of six million Jews in presumed homicidal gas chambers during the Second World War. But Parliament has deliberately avoided passing any such law in the UK. Instead, UK courts – including now Lord Carloway, Scotland’s most senior judge – are engaged in a cowardly criminalisation of revisionism via abuse of other laws such as the Communications Act, and via abuse of the extradition process.

This conveniently avoids any parliamentary debate on the merits of the revisionist case. Though the historicity of the ‘Holocaust’ was not a legal point at issue during the trial, and though he has not indicated any competence of his own on historical matters, Lord Carloway assumes the right to declaim on “the patent falsehood” of Vincent’s work. Lord Carloway makes statements about the Auschwitz death toll and about the notorious ‘confession’ of camp commandant Rudolf Höss, though no expert witness testimony was adduced at any stage of Vincent’s extradition process about these matters.

Lord Carloway does not himself claim personal expertise in 20th century history and does not indicate that he has carried out even a single hour of documentary research on such topics. Notably he relies on the Höss ‘confession’. In what other case would Lord Carloway be happy for a Scottish court to rely on a ‘confession’ obtained by torture and blackmail, or on submissions concerning the scene of the crime that were provided by the Kremlin’s military and intelligence services?

The version of history laid down by the Nuremberg trial – instituted by the victors of the Second World War, and largely based on ‘evidence’ by a Kremlin-controlled ‘commission’ – is protected in France by the ‘Gayssot Law’ enacted in 1990, appropriately enough on the initiative of a French Communist MP allied to a millionaire Jewish socialist.

This ‘Gayssot Law’ was designed to criminalise the work of the pioneering revisionist scholar Professor Robert Faurisson, who though born in Shepperton, West London, to a Scottish mother and French father, lived and taught in France throughout his adult life, latterly as Professor of French Literature at the University of Lyon.

From the mid-1970s until the day before his death in 2018, Professor Faurisson wrote and published detailed research into the alleged ‘gas chambers’, summarising his conclusions in a famous sentence:
The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.

It is a curious coincidence that the Court of Session judgment rejecting Vincent Reynouard’s appeal was delivered one day after Professor Faurisson’s birthday, and a few hours before what has in recent years become a worldwide festival of historical ‘remembrance’ – Holocaust Memorial Day. In 1995 Faurisson directly addressed “Auschwitz: the facts and the legend” in an essay now available online at the Robert Faurisson website.

Vincent Reynouard spoke at the conference in October 2018 – held in Shepperton, the Professor’s birthplace – at which Robert Faurisson gave his final speech, a day before his death. Vincent (who was awarded the Robert Faurisson International Prize in 2020) is today’s leading representative of the Faurissonian tradition of scholarly re-examination of the ‘Holocaust”s evidential basis, while the courts (both in Paris and now sadly in Edinburgh) have abandoned scrutiny of evidence and now prefer to genuflect in submission to ‘Holocaustianity’.

Most of the Western world has moved away from organised religion, but ‘Holocaust’ memorialisation has become a pseudo-religion, with Auschwitz-Birkenau as its Calvary and anti-revisionist legislation as the new blasphemy laws.

Though the UK has no such laws, Lord Carloway affirms in his judgment that Vincent’s online publications are extraditable offences because they can be deemed “grossly offensive” under s.127 of the Communications Act 2007. This is an updating for the internet age of a law originally designed to criminalise obscene telephone calls.

In this instance, the law has been stretched to cover offending “members of the Jewish and other communities whose members perished at Auschwitz and Birkenau. The same applies to those living with the memory of Oradour. It is not necessary to be a member of the relevant communities to be grossly offended by such statements; any reasonable person would be.”

Lord Carloway makes the dire implications clear: “Although it is not an offence to hold these views and, in certain contexts, to express them, it is a breach of section 127 of the 2007 Act to communicate them to the public on the internet.”

By Lord Carloway’s implication, online revisionism is to be deemed criminal in the UK, even when expressed in scholarly terms, and even without a specific parliamentary statute.

This is a blatant attack on fundamental human rights: an attack on the basic principles not only of UK law but of European civilisation’s accepted intellectual standards.

We shall report soon on the next stage in the fight for Vincent Reynouard’s freedom and the fight for real history.

https://jailingopinions.com/realhist...onist-scholar/
 
Old February 1st, 2024 #36
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Vincent Reynouard faces extradition with courage and confidence in the future of revisionism


February 1, 2024

The French revisionist scholar Vincent Reynouard, who has been held in Edinburgh prison since his arrest in November 2022, will be extradited to France next week after it became clear that there was no further avenue of appeal. (The photo above shows the late Richard Edmonds presenting Vincent with the Robert Faurisson International Prize 2020.)

[url=https://realhistory.info/2024/01/26/vincent-reynouards-edinburgh-appeal-rejected-as-french-courts-seek-to-jail-revisionist-scholar/As we reported a few days ago[/url], Scotland’s most senior judge rejected Vincent’s appeal after a hearing at Edinburgh’s High Court of Justiciary. Although Scotland remains part of the United Kingdom, the UK Supreme Court in London has no jurisdiction in his case.

Vincent Reynouard issued a statement at his blog yesterday. (English translation below)

The news of my upcoming extradition having spread, correspondents wrote to me to tell me that I must be disappointed and undoubtedly demoralised. I thank them and reassure them: I am neither.

When, on the evening of January 26th, a fellow inmate informed me that Scottish television had announced the High Court’s decision, I was making a watercolour for the widow of the revisionist Carlos Porter. After asking my informant a few questions, I quietly got back to work.

Disappointment and demoralisation are consequences of our personal desires. Now, personally, I don’t want anything. I fulfil my mission by spreading revisionism. When I physically die, I will be rewarded for it.

For their part, do my contemporaries deserve the truth? If so, then I will see my work bear fruit. Otherwise, the seeds sown will germinate after my death, or perhaps never. I can’t do anything about it; It’s God’s business, not mine.

Here in Edinburgh Prison, my life has not changed one bit. In the calm of my cell, I write, I read, I draw and I meditate. Far from appearing as a fearsome spectre, the upcoming extradition presents itself as a simple door opening onto the future, a continuation which, if the ordeals are experienced positively, will prove enriching. Hence my serenity.

Last thing: according to the BBC, the High Court magistrates stressed that in the current context, all my videos were “grossly offensive” to all citizens of a modern society. Proof of the importance of World War II revisionism: it leaves no one indifferent. I had noted this for a long time. For revisionism, it is a great victory. So why would I be disappointed or demoralized?

Thank you to you who support me.

Vincent Reynouard


We shall continue to report on Vincent’s case, and on the broader revisionist struggle. It appears that the UK is to be the new frontline for attempts to criminalise revisionism. If so, our enemies should be warned that there will be no surrender.

https://jailingopinions.com/realhist...f-revisionism/
 
Old February 1st, 2024 #37
U. Dunrouse
Senior Member
 
U. Dunrouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 4,248
Default

Thus "free speech" is sacred and above discussion only for the lesbian anti-Putin agitators of Pussy Riot and the boomer Marxist propagandists of Charlie Hebdo, it seems...

Where are all those free speech activists and democracy champions when you need them? Too busy flattening Gaza maybe?

__________________
When your world has been hijacked by parasitic pathogens,
immune response becomes 'hate' and immunodeficiency 'progress'
 
Old February 3rd, 2024 #38
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
Default

Vincent Reynouard arrives in Paris and is released under heavy guard!

Editorial staff
Participatory Democracy
February 03, 2024

Démocratie Participative

Vincent had recently addressed his supporters via his official website. He has left Britain, a sinister country with no future, ruled with an iron fist by the Jews. He's already in France!

Le Monde :

Quote:
On Friday February 2, Scotland handed over to France the multi-convicted Holocaust denier and neo-Nazi Vincent Reynouard, arrested in November 2022. He was indicted in Paris, then released under judicial supervision, Agence France-Presse has learned from sources close to the case.

One of the two sources close to the case said that Mr Reynouard, whose extradition had been authorized by Scotland on October 12, had been flown to France mid-day on Friday.

He was then presented to an examining magistrate in Paris, who indicted him for "denial of war crimes", "denial of crimes against humanity" and "incitement to hatred", then placed under judicial supervision, according to the second source, who explained that the penalties for these offenses did not include detention.
There's no preventive detention for press offenses, that's what they mean.

Quote:
Wanted by French authorities in ongoing investigations, Vincent Reynouard, 54, had fled to Scotland, where he lived under a false identity, until his arrest in the Anstruther area, a small fishing port north of Edinburgh.

Also sought by France for several sentences handed down in his absence - his last, six months in prison, dates back to January 2021, for a video published in 2019 in which he denied the reality of the Holocaust -, Vincent Reynouard can lodge an objection to these sentences, which are therefore not enforceable.
Personally, I see no point in dragging out these proceedings by appealing. I might as well go to prison and serve them before returning to a country completely free of Jewish influence.

There are several options.

Quote:
His hunt, led by the Office central de lutte contre les crimes contre l'humanité et les crimes de haine (OCLCH), began in August 2020, when a tag reading "Reynouard is right" was found on the memorial at Oradour-sur-Glane (Haute-Vienne), a village whose population was massacred by the SS Das Reich division on June 10, 1944.

In several videos posted on the Internet, Vincent Reynouard, who had opposed his extradition, had questioned the massacre. In October, Scottish Sheriff Christopher Dickson ruled that the videos were "beyond what is tolerable in our society", and authorized his extradition.
The truth is very poorly tolerated in democracies.

Quote:
Although British law does not criminalize Holocaust denial, the judge ruled that the charges against Vincent Reynouard - "public trivialization of a war crime" and "public denial of the existence of crimes against humanity committed during the Second World War" - fell within the scope of the Communications Act.
These Jewish courts won't be able to hold him forever. The extravagant means employed to have him extradited will result, at best, in a few years' imprisonment, and then the hero will be free again and much better prepared.

For the Jews, jubilation will give way to despondency. This is all the more true in the new, resolutely anti-Semitic world climate.

http://frontnationalsuisse.hautetfor.../02/index.html
 
Old February 3rd, 2024 #39
Bismillah
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 296
Default

the ironic thing is, the best place to learn the history of the Jews in France, is from the Jews, there's tons of videos about the history of the Jews in france. And they don't go much out of the way to cover it up.

This is a really good history of the jews in france. He talks about the struggle of Jews to have their own court system in France, recognized by the gentile government of France. This was the beginning of the end. They leveraged this to absolute maximum advantage, especially in business.


The creation of the ridiculous Office central de lutte contre les crimes contre l'humanité is just a perpetuation of this principle, centuries later, they have government authority as a result of those French liberals letting them have their own courts, police systems.

These are the specific Jews doing this.

Quote:
The Central Office for Combating Core International Crimes and Hate Crimes (previously known as Central Office for Combatting Crimes Against Humanity, Genocide and War Crimes abbreviated "OCLCH" in French) is a French inter-ministerial service.

The Office is attached to the French National Gendarmerie. It coordinates and directs judicial investigations. It works against crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes and crimes of torture. Its agents search for the authors, co-perpetrators and alleged accomplices of those offences. If they likely to be on the French territory the Central Office can take action against them.

The motto of the OCLCH is: "Hora fugit, stat jus" ("time passes, law remains").
Creation and Missions
The Central Office for Combating Crimes against Humanity, Genocide and War Crimes was created on 5 November 2013. Considering the offenses it is in charge of, it has the particularity of exercising its activity within the legal framework of universal jurisdiction. It regularly sends his investigators abroad using international rogatory commissions, to places where the facts have been committed. There, in co-operation with the local authorities, it gathers the elements useful to the manifestation of the truth.
We can pretend all day that not all Jews are guilty but when i see EVERY single late night talk show making fun of the FBI agent for not wearing a shirt at the beach...because he was investigating the ORGAN HARVESTING NETWORKS in New York, my fucking god, they are ALL just that AWFUL.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.
Page generated in 0.17653 seconds.